Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-24 Regular Meeting• i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 24, 1992 1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Malone at 6:00 P.M. Members of City Council Present: Mayor Norman Malone, Councilpersons Guy Sutherland, Mike Cooper, Bob Thrower, Bob McLaughlin, Alton Porter (arrived at 6:12 P.M.), Deotis Gay, B. Don Skelton, Jerry Clarke Members of City Council Absent: None Members of City Staff Present: City Manager Bob Herrera, City Attorney Knox Askins, City Secretary Cherie Black, Assistant City Manager John Joerns, Planning Director Chuck Harrington, Police Chief Bobby Powell, Director of Public Works Steve Gillett, Finance Director Jeff Litchfield, Finance Officer Linda Stubbs, Human Resources/Purchasing Manager Louis Rigby, Municipal Court Judge J. B. Williamson Others Present: Five citizens 2. The invocation was given by Councilperson Clarke. 3. Council considered approving the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1992. Motion was made by Councilperson Skelton to approve the February 10 minutes as presented. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 8 ayes and 0 nays (Councilperson Porter had not yet arrived). Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None 4. A proclamation for Vietnam Veterans Day was to have been presented. Since there was no one present to receive the proclamation, the Mayor announced that the Vietnam Memorial will be on display at Forest Park East in League City from March 20 through March 22. 5. Ms. Lisa Honeycutt addressed Council regarding the newly installed wheelchair ramps and curbing on Main Street. She is very pleased with it, and expressed hopes that each budget year more could be added. 6. Presentation of the 1991 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was delayed until representatives of the auditing firm arrived. • • Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council February 24, 1992, Page 2 7. Council considered an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., for professional engineering services for replacement of pavement on East H. Motion was made by Councilperson Gay to award the professional engineering services agreement to H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., by adopting Ordinance 1809. Second by Councilperson Skelton. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None 8. Council considered an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with Manning Engineering for professional engineering services for rehabilitation of Hillridge bridge. The City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1813 - AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND MANNING ENGINEERING CORPORATION, FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF HILLRIDGE BRIDGE; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Motion was made by Councilperson Cooper to adopt Ordinance 1813 as read by the City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None 9. Council considered an ordinance closing the alley between Lots 1 through 7 and 8 through 14, in Block One of Sylvan Beach First Subdivision. The City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1814 - AN ORDINANCE VACATING, ABANDONING AND CLOSING THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 1, SYLVAN BEACH, FIRST SUBDIVISION, IN THE JOHNSON HUNTER SURVEY, A-35, LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. Motion was made by Councilperson Skelton to adopt Ordinance 1814 as read by the City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Gay. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council February 24, 1992, Page 3 Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None At this time, Finance Director Jeff Litchfield was called upon to present item 6, the 1991 CAFR report. Jeff reviewed the document, then introduced Chuck Yaple and Chris Breaux, Null & Associates, the City's auditors. Mr. Yaple spoke on behalf of the firm to compliment the City's standing. 10. Council considered a resolution authorizing participation in H-GAC D.A.R.E. grant program. The City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 92-03 - A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT REQUEST TO THE GOVERNOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION FOR FUNDING TO THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, FOR A PROGRAM KNOWN AS JUVENILE JUSTICE & DELINQUENCY PREVENTION ACT Motion was made by Councilperson Cooper to adopt Resolution 92-03 as read by the City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None 11. Council considered a resolution authorizing submission of application for third year grant for Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Program. The City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 92-04 - A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT REQUEST TO THE GOVERNOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION FOR FUNDING TO THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, FOR A PROGRAM KNOWN AS INFORMATION SYSTEMS/COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH Motion was made by Councilperson Skelton to adopt Resolution 92-04 as read by the City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Clarke. The motion carried, 9 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone Nays: None Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council February 24, 1992, Page 4 12. Administrative Reports A. City Manager Bob Herrera introduced Charles "Chuck" Harrington, the City's new Planning Director. B. Municipal Court Judge J. B. Williamson presented a report to Council regarding different programs which are being utilized in Municipal Court, most of which are programs dealing with juvenile offenders. C. The City Manager reminded Council of the executive session items to be addressed. 13. Council Action Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, McLaughlin, Porter, Gay, Skelton, Clarke and Mayor Malone brought items to Council's attention. 14. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:06 P.M. to address the following: (A) V.A.T.S. - Article 6252-17, Section 2(E) - (Legal) - Meet with Counsel regarding Houston Chemical Services, Inc./Southern Ionics, Inc.; (B) V.A.T.S. - Article 6252-17, Section 2(G) - (Personnel) - Evaluation of Municipal Court Judge; (C) V.A.T.S. - Article 6252-17, Section 2(G) - (Personnel) - Discuss Council/Staff informational items. Council returned to the table at 8:24 P.M. No action was taken on executive session items. 15. There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at 8:26 P.M. Respectfully bmitted: U Cherie Black, City Secretary Passed & Approved, this the 2~rd da of March, 1992 /' /~G~i~~~ Norman L. Malone, Mayor Office. of the Mayor r ~~ ~p~~~,~ : More than 58,000 men and women lost their lives on the battlefields of Vretnarn defending the ideals on which the United States of 19merica was founded; and WHEREAS, in 1982 our nation built a monument to the lives lost, the survivors, and the unresolved feelings toward the war itself,• and WHEREAS, many people will never have the chance to visit the monument in Washington, D.C., to begin to resolve their own personal feelings; and WHEREAS, Forest Park East Cemetery is bring to League City, on Friday, March 20 t/trough Sunday, March 22, 1992, a 240 foot replica of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial that will allow our citizens to experience tl:e intense human emotion associated with the monument. NOW, THEREFORE, I, NORMAN L. MALONE, MAYOR of the City of La Porte, do hereby proclaim Saturday, March 21, 1992, as VIETNAM VETERANS DAY in the City of La Porte, and encourage all citizens to visit the Vietnam Memorial while it is being displayed in League City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affrxed hereto, this the 24th day of February, 1992. CITY OF LA PORTE Norman L. Malone, Mayor ;~~ ~ G / I ~ ~ ~~ REST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGEND~TEM Agenda Date Requested: February 24, 1992 Requested By: XXX S. Gillett Department: Report Resolution _ Exhibits: Proposal from H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. Proposed Budget Memo of January 27, 1992 Plat of Proposed Improvements SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The City of La Porte's 1991-92 Budget allocates ,$175,000 for the replacement of the concrete pavement on East H Street. An additional $20,000 is available from funds remaining from the joint venture with Harris County Precinct 2 for contract overlay, for a total of~$195,000 to design and construct the Project. H. Carlos Smith Engineers And Surveyors, Inc. has submitted a proposal to provide the necessary professional engineering and surveying services for the Project, including paving, storm sewers and sanitary sewer lines. The proposed design budget is as follows. Preliminary Engineering Phase $ 5,200 Design Phase 6,400 Construction Phase 2,400 Total Engineering 1$ 4,000 It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for the design of improvements to East H Street for an amount not to exceed $14,000. Action Required by Council: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. to provide professional engineering services for an amount not to exceed $14,000. Availability of Funds: xxxx General Fund Capital Improvement xxxx Other (Utility CIP Fund) Account Number: Water/Wastewater General Revenue Sharing Funds Available: xx YES NO Approve or City Counci Agen a Robert T. Herrera DATE City Manager Public Works Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 1809 • AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND H. CARLOS SMITH ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC., FOR THE EAST "H" STREET PROJECT; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the contract, agreement or other undertaking described in the title of this ordinance, in substantially the form as shown in the document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute such document and all related documents on behalf of the City of La Porte. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all such signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such documents. Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252-17, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 24th day of February, 1992. CITY OF LA PORTE BY Norman L. Malone, Mayor ATTEST: Cherie Black City Secretary APP 0 ED: /, > " ~N , Knox W. Askins City Attorney • • H. CARLOS SMITH ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS. INC. 423 N. HWY. 146 P.O. BOX 529 (713) 471-4226 lA PORTE, TEXAS 77572-0529 January 31, 1992 City of La Porte . P. 0. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 Attn: Mr. Steve Gillette Director of Public Works Re: Engineering Proposal East H Street Improvements Dear Steve: Forwarded herewith is our proposal to provide the necessary professional engineering and surveying services for the proposed re-construction of the improvements to the East H Street Paving, storm drains and sanitary sewer lines in the general area between San Jacinto Avenue and Park Street as we previously discussed. We trust this proposal will meet with your approval. We wish to think you for allowing our firm the opportunity to provide you with this proposal to meet your engineering and surveying needs. We are looking forward to working with you on this project should our firm be selected. Very truly yours, H. Car s it Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. /~~ H. Carlos Smith, P.E. President HCS/kr Enclosure • • H. CARLOS SMITH ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS, INC. 423 N. HWY. 146 P.O. BOX 529 (713) 471-4226 LA PORTE. TEXAS 77572-0529 3anuary 31, 1992 City of La Porte P. 0. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 Attn: Mr. Bob Herrera City Manager Re: East H Street Improvements Dear Mr. Herrera: We propose to render professional engineering services in connection with the East H Street Improvements. You are expected to furnish us with full information as to your requirements including any special or extraordinary consideration for the Project or special services needed, and also to make available pertinent existing data. Our proposal is more fully described as follows: I. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work involves the Preliminary Engineering Phase, Design Phase and the Construction Phase for the replacement and re-routing of approximately 1,050 feet of sanitary sewer line, including service lines and all appurtenances there-to; the removal and replacement of approximately 3,000 square yards of reinforced concrete pavement with curbs; the lime stabilization of approximately 3,500 square yards of subgrade; the removal and replacement of approximately 13 storm water inlets; the investigation and repair of approximately 1,100 linear feet of storm sewer line of various sizes; the removal and replacement of approximately 250 square yards of asphalt transitions and including the final grading and clean up of the construction area. The scope of work will consist of the preliminary engineering phase including consultations with the Owner, or his representatives, to determine the extent of the project, prepare preliminary design criteria, preliminary drawings and outline specifications, and a preliminary cost estimate, and outlining recommendations of the Engineer; complete design including preparation of plans and specification for the construction of the improvements, the identification of any public utilities interfering with the proposed improvements and the notification of these utility companies; the identification of all agencies requiring plan review and approvals and assistance to the City in obtaining permits and plan approvals from these agencies. Assist the City in advertising, receiving and analyzing bids from contractors for the construction of the Project, awarding of contract, preparation of contract documents and perform contract administration during construction. Page 1 of lA • • TT. SCOPE OF SERVICES ENGINEERING AND DESIGN: Project Manager for this project will be Mr. H. Carlos Smith, P.E., assisted by Mr. James F. Beck, R.P.S. Schedule of work is detailed below. Consultations with City staff, regulatory agencies and utility companies will be on going as the project progresses. The Engineer will not proceed from one phase to the next phase without written approval and authorization to proceed from the City of La Porte. The purpose of the Preliminary Phase is to define the overall concept and refine the scope of work of the project to be incorporated in the Design Phase. Major questions of design and utility interference will be resolved with an "end product" to be clearly defined. Work to be perf orrned in the preliminary phase will include: 1. Establish design criteria from the City's Comprehensive Plan and recommend any changes or additions. 2. Make recommendations as to alignment and grade to avoid interference with existing and future improvements. Evaluate advantages and disadvantages of alternate construction and prepare preliminary cost estimates. 3. Establish and recommend the scope of any soil and foundation investigations, which in the opinion of the Engineer may be required; upon written authorization by the City, the engineer shall arrange for such work to be done by a sub- contractor approved by the City. 4. Conduct additional field surveys, necessary to assist with alignment and grade determination, including topographic information with existing grades, and information necessary to verify public and franchise utilities and related structures within or crossing the proposed alignment and to determine their interference with the Project. 5. Determine and define all regulatory agency requirements such as Harris County Flood Control District, and assemble applicable codes and standards. 6. Identify any potential problems, present alternate resolutions for each problem, and recommend, with reasoning for recommendation, problem solutions. 7. Outline design criteria and standards and methods used. Page 2 of 19 • • 8. Finalize scope of work, schedule and proposed budget for the Design Phase, including breakdown of all other services required to complete the Design Phase. 9. Prepare Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Cost Estimate and furnish 5 copies of preliminary documents to City for approval prior to starting the Design Phase. All items will be coordinated with the City staff and assist City in discussions with adjacent property owners. Conduct two progress meetings with owner. Upon completion of Preliminary Engineering Phase, and upon written approval of the Preliminary Engineering Report by the City, the Engineer shall proceed with Design Phase. Work to be performed in the Design Phase shall include the following: 1. Conduct field surveys necessary to complete the design of the project. 2. Collect available plats, easement descriptions and right-of-way for the project area. 3. Establish design standards and methods and detail areas requiring special design considerations. Evaluate alternate construction standards and alternate pipe materials. 4. Assist the City in obtaining approvals of all regulatory agencies such as Harris County Flood Control District, Texas State Health Department and Harris County. Preliminary plans approved by the City shall be submitted to regulatory agencies for approval and/or permitting. 5. Notify franchise utilities of any conflicts with proposed improvements and arrange for any necessary relocations. 6. Prepare preliminary construction drawings and specifications for review by the City, and prepare estimate of construction cost. 7. After review of preliminary construction drawings and specifications, complete final construction drawings and specifications and prepare contract documents. 8. Submit final contract documents to the City for final review. Page 3 of 19 • • 9. Conduct two progress meetings with the owner. 10. Upon final approval by the City, furnish Owner with five copies of final contract documents, and final detailed construction cost estimate. Furnish Owner 10 copies of final contract documents and detailed construction drawings for bidding process. Additional copies for bidding purposes will be furnished at reproduction cost. Upon completion of the Design Phase and upon written approval of the City, the Engineer shall proceed with the Construction Phase. Work to be performed under the Construction Phase shall include the following: 1. Assist the City in Pre-qualifications of Contractors. 2. Assist the City in advertising for bids for the Project and notifying prospective Contractors of the scope of the Project. 3. Conduct pre-bid conferences. 4. Assist the City in receiving, opening and analyzing bids. 5. Make recommendation to the City for award of the contract to the lowest qualified Contractor. 6. Notify Contractor of award of bid and prepare Contract Documents with approval of City Attorney. 7. Conduct Pre-Construction conferences. 8. Re-establish alignment and bench marks for horizontal and vertical control for use by the Contractor. Furnish City and Contractor with information. 9. Perform contract administration during construction. 10. Provide mylars of record drawings to City of La Porte, upon completion of construction. Information to be obtained from Contractors record prints. Page 4 of 19 • • III. SCHEDULE The Engineer is ready, willing and able to start work immediately upon receipt of a signed contract with the City on this project. Anticipated schedule of completion of each phase is as outlined below, based on working days. A. Preliminary Engineering Phase 1. Field Surveys 3 days 2. Preparation of Preliminary design, plan, and documents 10 days ESTIMATED TIME 13 days B. Final Design Phase 1. Final Field Surveys 2. Preparation of Preliminary Contract Documents, etc. 3. Preparation of Final Contract Documents ESTIMATED TIME C. Construction Phase 1. Contract Administration ESTIMATED TIME TOTAL ESTIMATED TIME 1 day 20 days 4 days 25 days 10 days 10 days 48 days IV. COMPENSATION A. Preliminary Engineering Phase: Engineering fee based on per diem rates and man hours expended on the project estimated at $ 5,200.00 . B. Design Phase: Engineering fee based on per diem rates and man hours expended on the project estimated at $ 6,400.00 . Page 5 of 19 C. Construct Phase: Engineering fee based on per diem rates and man hours expended on the project estimated at $ 2,400.00 . Total engineering fee based on per diem rates shall not exceed $14,000.00 . Fee includes only those Services named in the scope of services. Copy of per diem rates attached hereto as Exhibit "B". D. Special Services: Special Services as outlined in the T.S.P.E. Manual we would perform at our per diem rates. Copy of Per Diem Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B. These special services are limited to the items on the enclosed list of special services from the T.S.P.E. Manual, "General Engineering Services", under Section V Special Services, Exhibit A. Field surveys to collect information required for both preliminary and design phases shall be performed at our per diem rates. These services are included in the fee under Section IV-A through C above for this project. Soil and foundation investigations including field and laboratory testing and related engineering analysis and recommendations would be contracted for at our cost plus 10% for handling or may be furnished by the City. E. Travel: Travel expenses will not be charged for within the limits of Harris County. Travel outside the County is computed at the rate of 30 cents per mile. F. Terms: Invoices will be submitted monthly based on per diem rates with net payment due within 14 days of invoice. Late payments will incur a late charge of one and one-half (1 1/2) percent per month from the original invoice date. Invoice to include a summary of man hours expended on the project. G. Conditions: If project is significantly changed in scope as outlined, fee will be adjusted by mutual agreement between Engineer and Owner. Page 6 of 19 • V. SPECIAL SERVICES: 1. Services of a resident Project Representative, and other field personnel as required, for on-the-site observation of construction. 2. Land surveys, and establishment of boundaries and monuments, and related office computations and drafting. 3. Preparation of property or easement descriptions. 4. Preparation of any special reports required for marketing of bonds. 5. Appearances before regulatory agencies, other than required for routine permitting. 6. Assistance to the Owner as an expert witness in any litigation with third parties, arising from the development of construction of the Project, including preparation of engineering data and reports. 7. Detailed mill, shop and/or laboratory inspection of materials or equipment. 8. Revision of contract drawings after a definite plan has been approved by the owner and re-drawing of plans to show work as actually constructed. 9. Services after issuance of Certificate of Completion. 10. Services to investigate existing conditions or facilities or to make measured drawings thereof, or to verify accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by Client. 11. Preparation of "As-Built" drawings. 12. Any other special or miscellaneous assignments specifically authorized by Owner. Page 7 of 19 • January 1, 1992 PER D = EM RATE S Engineer or Principal Registered Surveyor Engineer Assistant Draftsman Inspector, (Full Time) Computation and Computer Time Clerical Survey Field Party 2 Men 3 Men Each additional Man/Crew $80.00/hour $65.00/hour $45.00/hour $30.00/hour $50.00/hour $45.00/hour $20.00/hour $50.00/hour $70.00/hour $15.00/hour E. D. M. $60.00/hour Title and Record Search $45.40/hour Mileage from and return to La Porte (Outside of Harris County) $0.30/Mile Plus Expenses Outside of Harris County for Overnight or Extended Trips ~~ Per Diem Rates include all taxes, insurance and overhead; except for state sales tax. Page 8 of 19 • • We would expect to start our services promptly after receipt of your acceptance of this proposal and to complete our services in accordance with Section III, Schedule. If there are protracted delays for reasons beyond our control, we would expect to renegotiate with you the basis for our compensation in order to take into consideration changes in price indices and pay scales applicable to the period when services are in fact being rendered. We would need to know your total budgetary limitations for this project. We will endeavor to work within these limitations and will submit to you, periodically, through each phase of our services our opinions of estimated construction costs and where appropriate recommend an adjustment in the budget or a revision in the extent or quality of the Project. We do not guarantee that our opinions will not differ materially from negotiated prices or bids. If you wish greater assurance as to probable Construction Costs or if you wish formal estimates, an independent cost estimator should be employed. Services are to be rendered in the customary phases which, together with the general understandings applicable to our relationship with you, are set forth in the printed General Provisions thereto which are attached to and made a part of this proposal. Your particular responsibilities are also set forth in the General Provisions. This proposal, the Exhibits and the General Provisions consisting of 19 pages, represent the entire understanding between you and us in respect of the Project and may only be modified in writing signed by both of us. If it satisfactorily sets forth your understanding of the arrangement between us, we would appreciate your signing the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and returning it to us. This proposal will be open for acceptance until February 15, 1992, unless changed by us in writing. Very truly yours, H. Carlos Smith, Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. C / ~ I ~ ~ H. Carlos Smith, P.E. President Accepted this day of 19 City of La Porte By: Bob Herrera, City Manager HCS/kr Page 9 of 19 • GENERAL PROVISIONS: Attached to and made a part of LETTER AGREEMENT dated February 18, 1989, between City of La Porte, Texas (Owner) and H. Carlos Smith, Engineers & Surveyors, Inc., (Engineer) in respect of the project (Project) described therein. SECTION I - BASIC SERVICES OF ENGINEER 1.1 GENERAL 1.1.1. ENGINEER shall perform professional services as hereinafter stated which include customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and customary architectural services incidental thereto. 1.2. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PHASE After written authorization to proceed with the Preliminary Design Phase, ENGINEER shall: 1.2.1. In consultation with OWNER determine the extent of the Project. 1.2.2. Prepare preliminary design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary drawings and outline specifications. 1.2.3. Based on the information contained in the preliminary design documents, submit a revised opinion of probable Project Cost. 1.2.4. Furnish five copies of the above preliminary design documents and present and review them in person with the OWNER. The duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER during the Preliminary Engineering Phase are amended and supplemented as indicated in the Scope of Services. 1.3. DESIGN PHASE After written authorization to proceed with the Design Phase ENGINEER shall: 1.3.1. On the basis of the accepted preliminary design documents prepare for incorporation in the Contract Documents, final drawings to show the character and scope of the work to be performed by Contractors on the Project (hereinafter called "Drawings"), and Specifications. Page 10 of 19 • 1.3.2. Furnish to OWNER such documents and design data as may be required for, and assist in the preparation of the required documents so the OWNER may apply for approvals of such governmental authorities as have jurisdiction over design criteria applicable to the Project, and assist in obtaining such approvals by participating in submissions to and negotiations with appropriate authorities. 1.3.3. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Project Cost caused by changes in extent or design requirements of the Project or Construction Cost and furnish a revised opinion of probable Project Cost based on the Drawings and Specifications. 1.3.4. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, his legal counsel and other advisors contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related documents. 1.3.5. Furnish five copies of the above documents and present and review them in person with OWNER. The duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER during the Design Phase are amended and supplemented as indicated in the Scope of Services. 1.4. CONSTRUCTION PHASE During the Construction Phase the ENGINEER shall: 1.4.1. Consult with and advise OWNER and act as his representative as provided in Articles 1 through 17, inclusive, of the Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract, No. 1910-8 (1983 edition). The extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities and authority of ENGINEER as assigned in said Standard General Conditions shall not be modified, except as ENGINEER may otherwise agree in writing. All of OWNER's instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on behalf of OWNER to the extent provided in said Standard General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. Page 11 of 19 • • 1.4.2. Make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the executed work of Contractor(s) and to determine in general if such work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. ENGINEER shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of such work. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s) or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s). ENGINEER's efforts will be directed toward providing a greater degree of confidence for OWNER that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform to the Contract Documents, but ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the failure of Contractor(s) to perform the construction work in accordance with the Contract Documents. During such visits and on the basis of his on-site observations ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work, shall endeavor to guard OWNER against defects and deficiencies in such work and may disapprove or reject work failing to conform to the Contract Documents. 1.4.3. Review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the aforesaid Standard General Conditions) and samples, the results of tests and inspections and other data which each Contractor is required to submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the information given in the contract Documents (but such review and approval of other action shall not extend to means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto); determine the acceptability of substitute material and equipment proposed by Contractor(s); and receive and review (for general content as required by Specifications) maintenance and operating instruction, schedules, guarantees bonds and certificates of inspection which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.4.4. Issue all instructions of OWNER to Contractor(s); issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare change orders as required; have authority, OWNER's representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work; act as initial interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the acceptability of the work there-under and make decisions.on all claims of OWNER and Contractor(s) relating to the acceptability of the work of the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining to the execution and progress of the work; but ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations of decisions rendered by him in good faith. Page 12 of 19 1.4.5. Based on E•INEER's on-site observati• as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts; such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work .has progressed to the point indicated, that, to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, too the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his recommendation), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented that continuous or exhaustive examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of the work or to review the means, methods, sequences, techniques or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that ENGINEER has made an examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the monies paid on account of the Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that the Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. 1.4.6. Conduct an inspection to determine if the Project is substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the work has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and if each Contractor has fulfilled all of his obligations thereunder so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to each Contractor and may give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice shall be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 1.5.5. 1.4.7. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any Contractor, or subcontractor, of any of the Contractor(s) or subcontractors' agents or employees or any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise performing any of the Contractor(s) work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 1.5.1. through 1.5.7., inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to perform properly duties undertaken by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents. Page 13 of 19 SECTION II - SPECIAL SERVICES OF ENGINEER • 2.1. Normal and customary engineering services do not include services in respect of the following categories of work which are usually referred to as Additional or Special Services. If OWNER wishes ENGINEER to perform any Special Services, he shall so instruct ENGINEER in writing, and ENGINEER will be paid therefor as provided in the Letter of Agreement. SECTION III - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1. OWNER shall provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's requirements for the Project; designate a person to act with authority on OWNER's behalf in respect of all aspects of the project; examine and respond promptly to ENGINEER'S submissions; and give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever he observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the work. 3.2. OWNER shall also do the following and pay all costs incident thereto: Furnish to ENGINEER core borings, probing and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment and similar data; appropriate professional interpretations of all of the foregoing; environmental assessment and impact statements; property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys; property descriptions; zoning and deed restrictions; all of which ENGINEER may rely upon in performing his services. Guarantee access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private property. Provide such legal, accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for the Project, any auditing services required in respect of Contractor(s) applications for payment, and any inspection services to determine if Contractor(s) are performing the work legally. Provide field control surveys and fix reference points and base lines. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. 3.3. OWNER shall pay all costs incident to obtaining bids or proposals from Contractors}, Page 14 of 19 SECTION IV - MEANING OF TERMS • 4.1. As used herein the term "this Agreement" refers to the Letter Agreement to which these General Provisions are attached and to these General Provisions and Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Engineering Services and Related Matters", as if they were part of one and the same document. 4.2. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction Cost") means the total cost of the entire Project to OWNER, but it will not include ENGINEER'S compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to, properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting, insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection with the project. When Construction Cost is used as a basis for payment it will be based on one of the following sources with precedence in the order listed for work designed or specified by ENGINEER. 4.2.1. For completed construction work the total cost of alI work performed as designed or specified by ENGINEER. 4.2.2. For work designed or specified but not constructed, the lowest bona fide bid received from a qualified bidder for such work; or, if the work is not bid, the lowest bona fide negotiated proposal for such work. 4.2.3. For work designed or specified but not constructed upon which no such bid or proposal is received, the most recent estimate of Construction Cost, or, if none is available, ENGINEER'S most recent opinion of probable Construction Cost. Labor furnished by OWNER for the Project will be included in the Construction Cost at current market rates including a reasonable allowance for overhead and profit. Materials and equipment furnished by OWNER will be included at current market prices. No deduction is to be made from ENGINEER'S compensation on account of any penalty, liquidated damages, or other amounts withheld from payments to Contractor(s). 4.3. The per diem rates used as a basis for payment mean the salaries and wages paid to all personnel engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors, designers, draftsmen, specification writers, estimators, other technical personnel, stenographer, typists and clerks; including the cost of customary and statutory benefits including, but not limited to, social security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, workmen's compensations, health and retirement benefits, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. Page 15 of 19 4.4. The Payroll Costs used as a basis for p• ent mean salaries and wages (basic and incentive) paid to all personnel engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors, designers, draftsmen, specifications writers, estimators, other technical personnel, stenographers, typists and clerks. Additional employees may be added or employees may be terminated during the term of this contract. 4.5. Reimbursable Expenses mean the actual expenses incurred directly or indirectly in connection with the Project for; transportation and subsistence incidental thereto; obtaining bids or proposals from Contractor(s); furnishings and maintaining field office facilities; subsistence and transportation of Resident Project Representatives and their assistants; toll telephone calls and telegrams; reproduction of Reports, Drawings, Specifications, and similar Project-related items in addition to those required under Section 1; expenses of photographic production techniques; and, if authorized in advance by OWNER, overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. where compensation for Basic Services is on the basis of Direct Labor Costs or Payroll Costs times a factor, Reimbursable Expenses shall include the amount billed to ENGINEER by special consultants employed by ENGINEER (other than as an authorized Additional Service under Section 2) for such consultants services and Reimbursable Expenses times a factor of 10%, and shall also include expenses incurred for computer time and other highly specialized equipment, including an appropriate charge for previously established programs and expenses of photographic production techniques times a factor of 10%. SECTION V - MISCELLANEOUS 5.1. REUSE OF DOCUMENTS All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared by ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project of or any other project. any reuse without written verification of adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purposes intended will be at OWNER's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to ENGINEER; and OWNER shall identify and hold harmless ENGINEER from all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon by OWNER and ENGINEER. Page 16 of 19 • 5.2. OPINIONS OF COST Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Cost and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Project of Construction Cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him. If prior to the Bidding of Negotiating Phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to Project of Construction Cost he shall employ an independent cost estimator to bring the Construction Cost within any limitation established by OWNER will be considered Additional Services and paid for as such by OWNER. 5.3. LATE PAYMENT If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within thirty days after receipt of ENGINEER'S bill therefor, the amounts due ENGINEER shall include a charge at the rate of 1 1/2% per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven days' written notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been paid in full all amounts due him for services and expenses. 5.4. TERMINATION The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by other party to perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party. In the event of any termination, ENGINEER will be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and termination expenses. 5.5. SIICCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 5.5.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each binds himself and his partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and legal representatives to the other party of this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party, in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations of the Agreement. Page 17 of 19 5.5.2. Neither O~R nor ENGINEER shall assi~n, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except as stated in paragraph 5.5.1. and except to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent consultants, associates and subcontractors as he may deed appropriate to assist him in the performance of services hereunder. 5.5.3. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER. 5.6. ARBITRATION 5.6.1. All claims, counterclaims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties hereto arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thereof will be decided by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then obtaining, subject to the limitations and restrictions stated in paragraphs 5.6.3. and 5.6.4. below. This agreement so to arbitrate and any other agreement or consent to arbitrate entered into in accordance herewith as provided in this paragraph 5.6. will be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law of any court having jurisdiction. 5.6.2. Notice of demand for arbitration must be filed in writing with the other parties to this Agreement and with the American Arbitration Association. The demand must be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event may the demand for arbitration be made after institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Page 18 of 19 5.6.3. All demand for arbitration and all answering statements thereto which include any monetary claim must contain a statement that the total sum or value in controversy as alleged by the party making such demand or answering statement is not more than $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs). The arbitrators will not have jurisdiction, power or authority to consider, or make findings (except in denial of their own jurisdiction) concerning any claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter in question where the amount in controversy thereof is more that $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs) or to render a monetary award in response thereto against any party which totals more the $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs). 5.6.4. No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement may include, by consolidation, joinder or any other manner, any person or entity who is not a party to this Agreement. 5.6.5. By written consent signed by all the parties to the Agreement and containing a specific reference hereto, the limitations and restrictions contained in paragraphs 5.6.3. and 5.6.4. may be waived in whole or in part as to any claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter specifically described in such consent. No consent to arbitration in respect of a specifically described claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter in question will constitute consent to arbitrate any other claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter in question which is not specifically described in such consent or in which the sum or value in controversy exceeds $200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs) which is with any party not specifically described therein. 5.6.6. The award rendered by the arbitrators will be final, not subject to appeal and judgement may be entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Page 19 of 19 ~ ~ PROPOSED BUDGET EAST H STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROPOSED FUNDING UTILITY CIP FUND (003) - RECONSTRUCTION OF H ST. 5i7~,000 GENERAL FT.:ND OPERATING (001) - REMAINING CROM CONTRACT OVERLAY - JOINT DENTURE HARRIS COUNTY ?0,000 TOTAL A~~.~ILABLE BUDGET $19,000 PROPOSED EYPENDITURES ENGINEERING AND COtiSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 5 1,000 RECCtiSTRGCTION OF STREET, STORM AND SANITARY SE~MER LIZES ON EAST H STREET 175,000 CONTINGE\TCY 6, 000 TOTAL PROPOSED E:~PENDITURES Si35,000 CIT`1 OE LA PORTE INTER OFFICE MEMORANDQM January 27, 1992 TO: Robert ERONI: ~ e • T. Herrera, City Manager Gillett, Director of Public Works SLBJE Proposed Street Improvements East H Street Between S. Virginia and S. Utah The 1991-92 Budget allocated 517,000 for replacement of the concrete pavement on East H Street. The replacement is necessary due to damages from sewer repair, construction of the East La Porte Relief Sewer and deteriorating storm sewers.The budgeted amount included street replacement and storm sewer rehabilitation. A routine T.V. inspection of the existing sanitary sewer revealed advanced decay of the pipe material. Additionally, the line is located under the paved street section and is undersized. In fact, the existing 8" line carries sewer from two intersecting 8" lines. It is recommended that the existing 8" sanitary sewer located under this street be enlarged and relocated adjacent to the pavement. H. Carlos Smith Engineers and Surveyors, Inc. was asked to examine the proposed proje~~t and develop a prcposal to desigr. the necessary improvements. A preliminary estimate from tre Engineer is extremely close to the budgeted amcunt. The Engineer has propcsed a design and construction administration budget of S'_4,000. Additional funds are available from the Street Division's operating budget. A total of $90,000 was budgeted for contract overlay. Through an interlocal agreement with Harris County, 570,000 was approved by Council for the overlay program. A total of $20,000 remains, which could be used to fund the engineering of the East H Street Project. The proposed budget is attached for your review. A formal proposal from the Engineer, with alI phases of the work identified with cost, will be available soon. I will forward it for further. review as it becomes available. If you have any questions, please advise. Attachments xc: John Joerns, Assistant City Manager Orville Burgess, Street Superintendent ~~ ~~ t ,, ~~ ~ ~,c, le"RCP .h' UT I VE ~' ~ 1j~ - ~ f - ~ 2, ,~ ~. r ~ I ~ ~ p4 0 \ ,a ~~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ rti 2A ~` ~ 0 P + ~~ ~~0~ -x-p ~ -I-p-~='Y -x-- -- o ~ L,f oQ ~~ C~ ~ ' ~, T x ~ A ...~ I ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 18"RCP ~J KANSAS ~opAVE ~ \ ~~ ~ ------ .~--^-`-•-~-._1..-.~...1 i ~ of ~~ ~ a I ~'~ \ ~~ o- ~13- o ~~~ ~ -- ~ - ~ ,; ~' ~ ~ _ ~~ 101 ~I I l ~ I I ~ -x- I t` 1 \o~' ~ 4 .. Q . ~ IOWA AV E -, ~~~ '~ II ~ 1 a ~ ~ h ^ t ~P• -~ E., ~ ~ ~ ~cP ~- ~ ~' ,, {, ~~ .ti ? _ ~y~ ti • ~ ~ ~~ ~•~ (( 18 RC '7 G? ~ . \~• I ( ~ • ~ ~ ~ `\ ~~/ dud ~l~' "RCP ~ VIRGINIA AVE ~,~ .._ ~ "~ ""~ _- _ - - _ `'' r~ ~ I Imo` II I -~... ~d_~,~..~.~._ ~ ~ U (~'~) -- ~ a n I 1 cc l ~ ~ lD J N -X____ U ~ I I ~ U~ I J ~ J" '~-N b m a m m \ - u) 1 P ~ ~ ~~ ti - 1; ~ II ~ i --x----- .. --~---~- I - ----- - ----- ,. I-. !, I I' ' m ~ ~} ~ ~ / v' I I; m M /~ ~ i ' r i .... _._. __ _ N N ` ~ ~. ._... ___.._ I I ~ _... _. ..-.- .._ - N ?4"RCPT SAN JACINTO v p ti ~ ~ -__.. P ---- -'--- ----- rte- ._ --------~ ... -pj-- ---- o - _--- ' 00 a i ~ 18~'H(~P 1. ___..-~ f n r io = \ ~ II U ~~ .._.._ Cp ~'~~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~) `, i a a~ ~ ~. .5 Z ~~ • REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: Requested By: John Report XX Ordinance Administration Exhibits: Ordinance 1813 Technical Services Proposal from Manning Engineering Corporation for Hillridge Bridge Rehabilitation, dated February 11, 1992 SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION This years General Fund CIP budget includes $130,000 for the rehabilitation of Hillridge Bridge. This budget number was derived from an earlier preliminary investigation conducted by Bill Manning. Because of his familiarity with the project, I asked him to submit a proposal that would include the professional engineering services necessary to prepare a final recommendation, plans and specifications, and provide support through the bidding and construction phase. Mr. Manning has prepared a proposal to offer these services for the lump sum fee of $9,250.00. The budgeted salary for the City Engineer's position (vacant) is recommended as a source of funds. If approved the necessary funds will be transferred to 001-900- 900-507 professional services. You may note that the proposal is not very lengthy and does not include the usual verbiage for services related to preliminary investigations, laboratory fees, etc. This is because the investigative work has already been completed and serves as the beginning point for the services offered here. Action Required by Council: Approve Ordinance 1813 authorizing execution of a professional services agreement for the Hillridge Bridge Rehabilitation with Manning Engineering Corporation in the amount of $9,250. Approve the budgeted salary for the City Engineer's position as the source of funds. Availability of Funds: XX General Fund Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement General Revenue Sharing Other (None required) Account Number: 001-900-900-507 Funds Available: XX YES NO Approved for City Council Agenda VC~Z' b~-~ i..- l ~ - ~Z February 24, 1992 Department: Manager Robert T. Herrera DATE City Manager • • ORDINANCE N0. 1813 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND MANNING ENGINEERING CORPORATION, FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE REHABILITATION OF HILLRIDGE BRIDGE; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the contract, agreement or other undertaking described in the title of this ordinance, in substantially the form as shown in the document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute such document and all related documents on behalf of the City of La Porte. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all such signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such documents. Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252-17, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 24th day of February, 1992. CITY OF LA PORTE ATTEST: Cherie Black City Secretary AP VED: ~Gjv~ Knox W. Askins City Attorney BY Norman L. Malone, Mayor • • February 11, 1992 1425 26TH STREET LA PORTE, TEXAS 77571 713 / 471-7590 CITY OF LA PORTE P.O. Box 115 La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 ATTN: John Joerns Assistant City Manager RE: Technical Services Proposal/Agreement City of La Porte Hillridge Bridge Rehabilitation La Porte, Texas Dear Mr. Joerns, This letter is Manning Engineering Corporation's Technical Services Proposal and if approved by signature it shall become our Technical Services Agreement. Manning Engineering Corporation agrees to perform the various services as outlined in Attachment A, Scope of Services, and in consideration for those services the City of La Porte shall pay Manning Engineering Corporation according to Attachment B, Payment Schedule. Work authorized outside of the initial Scope of Services shall be paid on a negotiated basis. This constitutes the proposal. If acceptable, please sign as indicated below and return one copy for my file. You s,~truly, ~--' ~~~ ~~~ William T. Manning, .E., R.S President SIGNATURE: NAME: TITLE: Date :dr Attachments ATTACHMENT A CITY OF LA FORTE HILLRIDGE BRIDGE REHABILITATION BCOPE OF WORK I. PRELIMINARY PHASE A. REVIEW CITY FILES AND EVALUATE THE THREE ALTERNATIVES UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR THE REHABILITATION/REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE. B. PREPARE A SUMMARY REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATION FOR STAFF SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE. II. DE8IGN PHABE A. PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SELECTED ALTERNATIVE. B. SUBMIT TO CITY STAFF FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL TO BID. III. BIDDING PHASE A. SUPPORT CITY STAFF IN THE PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS. B. ATTEND PRE-BID CONFERENCE, BID OPENING, AND PREPARE A BID TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATION. IV. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A. ATTEND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING. B. REVIEW CONTRACTOR TECHNICAL SUBMITTALS AND PAY ESTIMATES. C. PROVIDE PERIODIC AND FINAL INSPECTION. ATTACHMENT B CITY OF LA FORTE HILLRIDGE BRIDGE REHABILITATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE ITEM I. PRELIMINARY PHASE A. REVIEW AND EVALUATE B. SUMMARY REPORT II. DESIGN PHASE A. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS B. REVISIONS ZII. BIDDING PHASE A. BID DOCUMENTS B. PRE-BID, BID, RECOMMENDATION IV. CONSTRUCTION PHASE A. PRE-CONSTRUCTION B. SUBMITTAL REVIEW AND ADMINISTRATION C. INSPECTION SUB-TOTAL FEE AMOUNT $ 500 500 1 000 $5,800 NO CHARGE SUB-TOTAL 5 800 $ 100 600 SUB-TOTAL 700 $ 250 $ 300 1 200 SUB-TOTAL 1 750 TOTAL 9 250 BASIS: NET 15 DAYS RE OEST FOR CITY COIINCIL AGENDA ITEM !' Agenda Date Request Requested By: J. Report Exhibits: Ordinance 1"814 Application for Map of location _ Department: Administration Resolution X Ordinance Alley closing SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Mr. Bruce Angel has made application with the City to close, vacate and abandon the alley between Lots 1 through 7 and 8 through 14, Block One, Sylvan Beach First Subdivision. The City Secretary has contacted all franchised utility companies and City departments requesting review and comment. All comments have been received. There were no objections to the proposed closing if the owner would agree to accept the existing water and sewer lines for private ownership and maintenance. The Harris County Appraisal District appraised value of the property is $1.25 per square foot. The total fair market value for this closing is $10,500, which per the ordinance, is derived in the following manner: 5600 sq. ft. x $1.25 per sq. ft. x 1.5 = $10,500 The ordinance closing, vacating and abondoning the alley has been prepared and the applicant has been notified of the following provisions which need to be met prior to delivering a certified copy of the ordinance. Property owners accepting ownership and maintenance of the existing water and sanitary sewer utilities located within the alley. (Included in Ordinance.) Property owners' agreement that any further development or subdivision of the property is subject to owners granting additional utility easements to the City and utility extensions to serve the subdivided lots and/or tracts. (Included in Ordinance.) A check in the amount of $10,500 from the property owners has been received. Action Required by Council: Staff recommends the closing, vacating and abandoning of the alley between Lots 1 through 7 and 8 through 14, Block One, Sylvan Beach First Subdivision by passing Ordinance 1814. The motion should state that the provisions noted above must be met prior to delivering a certified copy of the ordinance. Availability of Funds: General Fund Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement General Revenue Sharing Other Account Number: N/A Funds Available: YES NO A r ved t Council A ends ~~ ober Herrera DATE City anager C, J ORDINANCE NO. 1814 • AN ORDINANCE VACATING, ABANDONING AND CLOSING THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 1, SYLVAN BEACH, FIRST SUBDIVISION, IN THE JOHNSON HUNTER SURVEY, A- 35, LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte has been requested by record owner of all of the property abutting the hereinafter described alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas, to vacate, abandon, and permanently close the alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Porte has determined and does hereby find, determine and declare that the hereinafter described alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas, is not suitable, needed, or beneficial to the public as a public road, street and alley, and that the closing of the hereinafter described alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas, is for the protection of the public and for the public interest and benefit, and that the hereinafter described said alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas, should be vacated, abandoned, and permanently closed. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Section 1. Under and by virtue of the power granted to the City of La Porte under its Home Rule Charter and Chapter 13, Title 28, Article 1175, of the Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas, 1925, the hereinafter described alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35, La Porte, Harris County, Texas, is hereby permanently vacated, abandoned and closed by the City of La Porte, to-wit: Being the alley in Block 1, Sylvan Beach, First Subdivision, in the Johnson Hunter Survey, A-35,La Porte, Harris County, Texas. This alley closing is contingent upon property owners accepting ownership and maintenance of the existing utilities (water and ORDINANCE NO. 1814 Page 2 sanitary sewer) located within the alley. The point of ownership is to commence on the owner's side of the water meter and at the connection to the sanitary sewer manhole, continuing through the property to the point of termination. This alley closing is also contingent upon owner's agreement that any further development or subdivision of the property is subject to owners granting additional utility easements to the City and utility extensions to serve the subdivided lots and/or tracts. Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Article 6252-17, Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered. PASSED AND APPROVED, this day of 1992. CITY OF LA PORTE ATTEST: Cherie Black - City Secretary APPR VED: X~ ~y • + Rnox W. Askins City Attorney BY Norman L. Malone, Mayor CITY OF LA PO RTE APPLICATION FOR THE CLOSING OF STREETS AND ALLEYS Setc - 33 D a t e December 18, 1991 I, the undersigned owner Bruce C. Angel of (or option holder, etc) the following described real property located within the City of La Porte, Texas, hereby request and make application under the terms of Ordinance Number 1.550 for the vacating, abandoning and closing of the following Streets and/or Alleys: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF STRE~T~ AND/OR ALLEYS Street(s) Alley(s) Alley between lots 1~7 Block one and 814 Block one of Sylvan Beach First Sub-Division No, of Square Feet: 5600 sq. ft. SEASON FOR REQUEST Plan to build a home on the property Plot Plan Attached xx Proof of Ownership Submitted herewith is an application fee of $100.00. .,~-~ ~ ~, Signature of Applicant's P. 0. Box 1398. La Porte, Tx 77572 Address ~71'~) 471-2761 Telephone Number APPRAISAL INFORMATION C ~looo ~ ~~ ZS ~ ~' S~ r ~~' S°° HCAD Prime Rate ~ I.ZS per square foot. Adjacent Property EiCAD Prime Rate $ ~•ZS per square foot. Concurrence of Revenue Controll Z z nature) Fee to be collected by City: ~ ~O.~O CA TIO Recommended action to City Council City Council Action Date Ordinance No. dated _- ~ „ ~ YP -' ' ~ 2.7 '+ ' „ ~ P' r 34 2 :~;12. • - r, . ~ ' P5 .32 • •' ;` 26 31 .5 ',; 21 0 • - rt.: Yep :,• 5; ~ _ '~ 7 •`. w, ~.~ ~.} . Y~ ,; k .. i I ! ~j.'~ 1 .. ~ r., t • P9 . - ~ ~ ~ • 1. (~ PBj. ,~'•• a '. ' ' ! .. < ~'• +.'~ .•t ~ ~ p Z ~.; , 5 ~ • \. i ~'k~, ~ c .,i j4. ! ~ >. • ,; -.5k. . 23,1 ~ ~ Hj ; ~ ~~' l , ~ ~ . .-, ro .1.~ ~ •9 r ~ r ti:. 4a y 8 . .~ Y I i I '- ~ f v ~ I / l,/ i~ ' . - i - ~ ~v •. 6 :; O ` 2.4 'r` `4 . 2.4 11 r- :. ' 12.5 ~i ~ ,.f ~;` ~ ~ Q~ : ~i2.2 ~ Rip • 1 t r a 9r ~. - ,~ ~81i • • 12.2 ~ '~" ~ ~ ~~ A ~, ~ ~ 13:: 49 ~ ~~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ x,~}. O t2,3 ~ I ~ / q w u+x.,. K 18 P~ +' . t ' ~. ,v. ~ ,t. ~ "a t ~~ r~ % 10.3 ~ + , B f5. t A k A.~ a O I i 4 F 5 '~. •/ / . IF ' App. 5 h c y~/y .S\ A (~ :'~.s ?I' 4r '~lA • ..v •~~,~ y..~ ~~•,I ~ i. ~1 12.6 ter (~. + ~~~~~ .. + ~F. • ~ ~y t 171. r'J 1'.' +~v 'w •: ~~` ,~ >i ,5~i r ~~i P \ R~A~} : i ' 4•RCP i r ; ~ \~ ~ ,. ~ .~.., Ye . r;r ~ d , ~ _ C . .y C I i T :} -~.. r !` ~~_ c r,.. / a* ,12 a .. h { r ~ Z} ~~ ~ f ~ .4} /~ 37 ~ S 5 .:"fir iT, R*'~s' t. ~.. ;~~ r .•.~ :; :. . l'~ ' d"'1.5 ~ of 'nr} ~ Z~. l ! _ Y 1 i r ... ; ~~~~ ~GALI/ESTO . .._ si ~ ~ ~ M. ~.. 1 >. \ .Q ..}. i~ .j,: Y' .. ~. '~'er ' , , Y ~ , (l)\ rK` .r 13 Pi-efwset~ 'A//er_:C-osi•ng.. 5 1 11 2 \ ~ r 13 { .8 1e~ ~ t iY ~ ti ~ ~ - .. .. 1, ~ S ~ „~ 15 ~ •~ k ,, ~ \~~ ~~ '' ~ ~ ~~ 1:. .1~ \ ~ 4 1. , ,. ~ A ~',) \ ~ k~. ~ r~ r~ ~.. .; ~ ' ..: ~9 /. / ~"5 '~ ~ ~ .. ~ I it ~ ~'' • • REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM Agenda Date Requested: February 16, 1992_ Requested By: Bobby L. Powell Department: Police Exhibits: Report __ X _ Resolution SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Ordinance The Police Department is presently assembling the third year Grant package through HGAC for a Computer System. We are asking for a Resolution from Council to participate in the grant for the year 1992-93. SF-FO1 provides for funding to develop Criminal Justice automation. We are only requesting personnel cost for this year which will be on a 60-40 basis, with the city paying 40~ of the cost. Before the Grant can be turned in for review, we must forward a resolution from Council to participate in the grant. The MIS Committee has established a priority list for funding certain computer improvements. This system was one of those improvements and the availability of funds would take a large burden off the budget. The cost for the year 1992-93 are listed: CJD CITY Personnel $20,430 $13,622 Indirect 912 Subtotal $21,342 513,622 Total Grant Request Action Required by Council: Approve Resolution as submitted ALTERNATIVE: Rewrite Resolution for approval Availability of Funds: $34,964 X General Fund Water/Wastewater Capital Improvement General Revenue Sharing Other (None required) Account Number: Funds Available: YES NO ***Funds will be requested in Fiscal Budget Year 1993. Approved for City Council Agenda Robert T. Herrera DATE City Manager • RESOLUTION 9a - a.~ A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTS, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT REQUEST TO THE GOVERNOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION FOR FUNDING TO THE C I TY OF LA PORTS , TEXAS , FOR A PROGRAM KNOWN AS JUVENILE JUSTICE & DELIN UENCY PREVENTION ACT WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF La Porte, Texas, have the moral obligation to the citizens and taxpayers of the City of La Porte, Texas, to ensure a drug free living, working and learning environment in the most efficient and coordinated way possible; and WHEREAS, the Council is aware that there are limited funds available to operate drug abuse and awareness education programs; and WHEREAS, the Council feels that the Drug Abuse Resistance and Educational Program that's established in the La Porte Independent School District is a viable, workable and desirable way to further our gaol of a drug-free community and will enhance the DARE PROGRAM now in place in the City of La Porte, Texas, for all children and adults alike; and WHEREAS, the Council believes that an expansion of the DARE program to grades K-4 will only enhance and improve the effectiveness of the DARE Program; and WHEREAS, the opportunity exists to fund an expansion of the DARE Program in our community through the Office of the Governor of the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, that the city submit a grant request to the Office of the Governor of Texas, Criminal Justice Division, to assist in the funding for the expansion of the DARE program. PASSED AND APPROVED, this day of ,1992. County of Texas Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I, Cherie Black, City Secretary for the City of La Porte, do hereby certify this to be a true and exact copy of the City of La Porte Resolution No. adopted by La Porte City Council, (date) , CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN H-GAC D.A.R.E. GRANT PROGRAM (Res. 92-03) - B. L. Powell Motion by Second by VOTE: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Sutherland Cooper Thrower McLaughlin Porter Gay Skelton Clarke Malone Motion carried Defeated Tabled • i~ REQUEST_ FOR C I TY _ COUNC I L _ AGENDA__I TEM Agenda Date Requested: _February 16, 1992_ Requested By: __Bobby__L,____Powel_1___.___ Department: __Pol.ice_____ __ _ Report ______ X ______. Resolution ______.._____________ Ordinance Exhibits: SUMMARY__& RECOMMENDATION The Police Department is presently assembling the third year Grant package through HGAC for a Computer System. We are asking for a Resolution from Council to participate in the grant for the year 1992-93. SF-FO1 provides for funding to develop Criminal Justice automation. We are only requesting personnel cost for this year which will be on a 60-40 basis, with the city paying 40~ of the cost. Before the Grant can be turned in for review, we must forward a resolution from Council to participate in the grant. The MIS Committee has established a priority list for funding certain computer improvements. This system was one of those improvements and the availability of funds would take a large burden off the budget. The cost for the year 1992-93 are listed: CJD CITY Personnel $20,430 $13,622 Indirect 912 Subtotal 521,342 $13,622 Total Grant Request Action Required by Council: Approve Resolution as submitted ALTERNATIVE: Rewrite Resolution for approval Availability of Funds: $34,964 ___X __ General Fund__.__ Water/Wastewater ___ Capital Improvement _ General Revenue Sharing ____ Other (None required) Account Number: - __, __ Funds Available: YES NO ***Funds will be requested in Fiscal Budget Year 1993. App.roved__for__City__Counci_1_Agenda Robert T. Herrera DATE City Manager • RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTS, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT REQUEST TO THE GOVERNOR'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION FOR FUNDING TO THE C I TY OF LA PORTS , TEXAS , FOR A PROGRAM KNOWN AS INFORMATION SYSTEMS/COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF La Porte, Texas, have the moral obligation to the citizens and taxpayers of the City of La Porte, Texas, to ensure that the criminal justice system operates in the most efficient and coordinated way possible; and WHEREAS, the Council is aware that there are limited special services available to or provided to the victims of all crimes; and WHEREAS, the Council feels that the addition of the program known as Information Systems/Computer Aided Dispatch will materially enhance the administration of justice in the City of La Porte, Texas, for all crime victims; and WHEREAS, the opportunity exists to fund vital parts of this program through the Office of the Governor of the State of Texas, Criminal Justice Division; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, that the city submit a grant request to the Office of the Governor of Texas, Criminal Justice Division, to assist in the funding of the program of Information Systems/ Computer Aided Dispatch. PASSED AND APPROVED, this day of ,1992. County of Texas Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary I, Cherie Black, City Secretary for the City of La Porte, do hereby certify this to be a true and exact copy of the City of La Porte Resolution No. adopted by La Porte City Council, (date) __ ,