The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-04-22 Regular Meeting . e . e MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING REGULAR MEETING OF LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 22, 1996 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Norman L. Malone at 6:00 P.M. Members of City Council Present: Mayor Norman L. Malone, Councilpersons Guy Sutherland, Mike Cooper, Bob Thrower, Deotis Gay, Jack Maxwell and Jerry Clarke Members of Council Absent: Councilpersons Bob McLaughlin and Alton Porter Members of City Staff and City Employees Present: City Manager Robert T. Herrera, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong, City Secretary Sue Lenes, Assistant City Manager John Joems, Director of Administrative Services Louis Rigby, Director of Planning Guy Rankin, Fire Chief Joe Sease, EMS Chief Chris Osten, Purchasing Agent Susan Kelley, Golf Course Superintendent Dennis Hlavaty Others Present: Mr. Marvin Townsend, Executive Director of TML-IRP, Larry Womack, representing Heritage Group, Lewis Cline, representing Care Concepts of East Texas, Inc., and several La Porte citizens 2. INVOCATION BY DR. BOBBYE WORSHAM - SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH The invocation was delivered by Dr. Bobbye Worsham pastor of the Second Baptist Church, La Porte, Texas. 3. CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING APRIL 8, 1996 Council considered approving minutes of Regular Meeting April 8, 1996 Motion was made by Councilperson Maxwell to approve the minutes of April 8th as presented. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 6 ayes, 0 nays, and one abstain. Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Maxwell, Clarke and Mayor Malone None Council person Gay 4. PRESENTATION: SPECIAL PRESENTATION BY MR. MARVIN TOWNSEND, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE - INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK POOL Mr. Marvin Townsend, Executive Director of TML-IRP, presented a check to the City of La Porte for $19,329.60. This check is the results of effective loss prevention measures instituted by the City of La Porte and other Fund participants. Mr. Townsend also thanked Council for Mr. Herrera's participation on the Board of Trustees of the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool since May of 1993. e e Minutes Public Hearing and Regular Meeting La Porte City Council April 22, 1996, Page 2 5. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES, COMMUNICATIONS, AND CITIZENS AND TAX PAYERS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL There were no requests to speak before Council. 6. PUBLIC HEARING A - AMENDING ORDINANCE 1501, THE CITY OF LA PORTE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ZONE CHANGE REQUEST R96-OO2 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REZONING PROPERTY FROM MANUFACTURED HOUSING (M. H.) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (G.C.) THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 8902 SPENCER mGHWAY - G. Rankin OPEN PUBLIC HEARING REVIEW BY STAFF PUBLIC INPUT RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Malone opened the public hearing at 6:08 P.M. Director of Planning Guy Rankin reviewed the summary and recommendation for the request. There was no one speaking in opposition to the request. Mr. Larry Womack, owner of Heritage Corporation who is seeking the rezoning, spoke in favor of the change. Mr. Rankin reported staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission are recommending the rezoning request be approved. Mayor Malone closed the public hearing at 6:14 P.M. 7. CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 1501, TO REZONE A TRACT FROM MANUFACTURED HOUSING (M.H.) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (G. C.) (Ord. lSOI-T) - G. Rankin Assistant City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 1501-T - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 1501, MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE BY CHANGING CLASSIFICATION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED 8902 SPENCER HIGHWAY; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: Motion was made bv Counciloerson Clarke to approve Ordinance 1501-T as read by the Assistant City Attorney. Second by Councilperson Maxwell. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None e e Minutes Public Hearing and Regular Meeting La Porte City Council April 22, 1996, Page 3 8. PUBLIC HEARING B - CONSIDER A SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERl\fiT REQUEST SCU96-001, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRA-DISTRICT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR SENIOR CITIZEN ASSISTED LIVlNG CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 8727 FAIRMONT PARKWAY - G. RANKIN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING REVIEW BY STAFF PUBLIC INPUT RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Malone opened the public hearing at 6: 15 P.M. Director of Planning Guy Rankin reviewed the summary and recommendation for Special Conditional Use Permit SCU96-OO1. There was no one speaking in opposition to the request. Speaking in favor of the request was Mr. Lewis Cline, of Care Concepts of East Texas, Inc., representing the developer of the 61 unit senior citizen Assisted Living Center. Mr. Rankin stated, "Staff recommends the permit request with the following conditions: · Any development beyond that currently presented will require a separate Special Conditional Use Permit. · No changes or amendments shall be made to the recorded site plan and covenants without first obtaining authorization from the City of La Porte. · It should be noted in the Special Conditional Use Permit and in the deed covenants that the use of this property is limited to a 61 unit "senior citizen" assisted living center, as defined in SIC 8361, for these purposes; a senior citizen is defined as a person who is 55 years of age or older." Mr. Rankin reported the Planning and Zoning Commission has, by a unanimous vote, recommended that Special Conditional Use Permit Request SCU96-OO1 be approved. Mayor Malone asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak regarding this project. Mrs. Shelia Moore asked Mr. Cline how many units will be available, and how many of those will be double units? She also asked if the monthly fee will be assessed according to the senior's salary. Mr. Cline stated, "There are three different types of units available. They will vary by square footage. Some units will have kitchenettes, and some will not. We have designed our facilities to fit the typical retired teacher income level. Entry level is about $1,200. This is all inclusive; meals, transportation, utilities, cable T. V, housekeeping, and laundry." Councilperson Gay asked about a couple wishing to move into the facility. Mr. Cline said, "The rooms are designed to accommodate a couple also. The fee would be an additional $500, therefore the monthly cost would be $1,700 for a couple." Mayor Malone closed the public hearing at 6:33 P. M. e e Minutes Public Hearing and Regular Meeting La Porte City Council April 22, 1996, Page 4 9. CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION REGARDING SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PE~(SCU96~1)-G.Rarnrln Motion was made bv Councilperson Sutherland to approve SCU96-OO1. Second by Councilperson Maxwell. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None 10 PUBLIC HEARING - C CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PE~ REQUEST SCU96- 002 FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFF-SITE PARKING LOT TO BE LOCATED IN THE 200 BLOCK OF NORTH 15TH STREET OPEN PUBLIC HEARING REVIEW BY STAFF PUBLIC INPUT RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Malone opened the public hearing at 6:34. Director of Planning Guy Rankin reviewed with Council the summary and recommendation for the Special Conditional request, SCU96-OO2. Mr. Rankin reported the applicant has agreed to improve a portion of West Polk Street. This will be done according to City standards. The applicant has requested that an alley be closed. Staff is reviewing the request. There are no utilities in the alley, but staff is waiting on one franchise company, Southwestern Bell, to respond with their permission. This is the lone issue to resolve regarding this offsite parking. There was no one speaking against the request. Lynn Pfeiffer, owner of Pfeiffer and Son, Inc., who is seeking the permit, spoke in favor of approval. Mr. Rankin stated, .Staff supports this request and has full approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and they would ask Council for your support-. Mayor Malone closed the public hearing at 6:40 P.M. 11. CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION REGARDING SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PE~ (SCU96-002) - G. Rankin Motion was made by Council person Maxwell to approve SCU96-OO2. Second by Councilperson Clarke. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None e e Minutes Public Hearing and Regular Meeting La Porte City Council April 22, 1996, Page 5 12. CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION REGARDING THE ADDITION OF THREE PERSONNEL TO THE EMS DMSION - R. T. Herrera City Manager Robert T. Herrera reviewed the summary and recommendation for the request for three additional paramedic personnel in the EMS Division. Mr. Herrera asked that Council appropriate approximately $32,000 for the remainder of the current fiscal year from the General Fund contingency account to fund this request. He stated, "This would insure that the level of service our citizens are currently receiving is adequate, improved, and better as time goes on". Mayor Malone read a letter, see Exhibit A, from Councilperson Porter who was unable to attend the meeting tonight due to an out-of-state business meeting. Mr. Porter's letter stated, as member of the audit committee, he is in support of the recommendation and would like to encourage other Councilmembers to support the recommendation. Mr. Herrera stated, "As a result of this effort to improve our services, I would like to have a Workshop with the City Council perhaps on May 13th to address some of the EMS policies concerning one, Municipal Aide agreement with neighboring communities, and also issues dealing with transportation". Motion was made bv Councilperson Maxwell to approve the request for three additionall'ersonnel to the EMS Division. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None 13. CONSIDER AWARDING A BID FOR INSECTICIDES AND FAIRWAY FERTILIZERS TO GOLD KIST, AND HERBICIDES, FUNGICIDES, GREENS GRADE FERTILIZER, AND OTHER PRODUCTS TO TERRA INTERNATIONAL - A. Osmond Golf Course Superintendent Dennis Hlavaty reviewed the recommendation for awarding the bid. Motion was made by Council person Clarke to award the bid as presented bv Mr. Hlavaty. Second by Council person Thrower. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None 14. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS City Manager Robert T. Herrera reminded Council this weekend is Sylvan Beach Day. The Council is invited to participate in the festivities. You have been asked to meet at the Fitness Center at 8:30. If you are not planning to attend the festivities, please notify Sue Lenes or Carol Buttler. Mayor Malone reminded Council that each had contributed $20.00 last year for candy to be distributed during the parade and asked that this be done again this year. Councilperson Maxwell recommended Councilperson Sutherland be in charge of this project. Councilperson Sutherland agreed to the suggestion. e . Minutes Public Hearing and Regular Meeting La Porte City Council April 22, 1996, Page 6 15. COUNCIL ACTION Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Gay, Maxwell, and Mayor Malone brought items to Council's attention. Mayor Malone also reminded Council about the La Porte Manager's Network breakfast and meeting. He asked Council to contact Ms. Lenes if they are planning to attend. 16. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PURSUANT TO PROVISION OF THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW, CHAYfER 551.071 THROUGH 551.076, AND 551.084, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, - (CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY, DELmERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY, DELmERATIONREGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT OR DONATION, PERSONNEL MATTERS, CONFERENCE WITH EMPLOYEES, DELmERATIONREGARDING SECURITY DEVICES, OR EXCLUDING A WITNESS DURING EXAMINATION OF ANOTHER WITNESS IN AN INVESTIGATION) A. SECTION 551.07 - ( ) No executive session was held. 17. CONSIDERATION AND POSSmLE ACTION ON ITEMS CONSIDERED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION There were no considerations for item 13. Mayor Malone called for a motion to adjourn. Motion was made bv Council person Cooper to adiourn the meeting. Second by Councilperson Thrower. The motion carried, 7 ayes, and 0 nays. Ayes: Councilpersons Sutherland, Cooper, Thrower, Gay, Maxwell, Clarke, and Mayor Malone Nays: None 18. ADJOURNMENT The vote to adjourn passed, therefore the meeting duly adjourned at 6:54 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Sue Lenes, City Secretary Passed and Approved this the 6th ~May, 1996 /L~~~;fc e City of La Porte Established 1892 April 22, 1996 The Honorable Norman Malone Mayor City of La Porte Dear Mayor Malone: Please be advised that I will be unable to attend tonight's Council meeting due to an out-of-state business meeting that requires my attention. I would like to share with you, and ask that you share with Councilmembers, my feelings on Agenda Item # 12. As a member of the Audit Committee, I heard staff's presentation in full detail, and we support staff's recommendation. I would like to encourage the other Councilmembers, as well, to support the recommendation. Sincerely, \. AiV v~\ ~ , ~\ f~ <f.' ,I ~ '~\~~ Alton Porter Councilman AP:cjb EXHIBIT A P.O. Box 1115 · La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 · (713)471-5020 e e REQIsT FOR CITY COUNCIL AGEND'ITEM Agenda Date Requested: April 22. 1996 Requested By: Robert T. Herrera Department: Administration x Report Resolution Ordinance Exhibits: SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION The Texas Municipal League Workers' Compensation Fund ended 1994-95 in a strong financial position, with $148 million in assets and members' equity of more than $59 million. The Fund's strong performance in recent years can be attributed to two major factors, the 1991 workers' compensation reform and, reduced losses resulting from effective loss prevention measures instituted by the Fund's members. In response to these outstanding year end results, the TML Intergovernmental Risk Pool (IRP) Board of Directors has announced the return of $2.7 million to members of the Workers' Compensation Fund. The amount returned is based on the length of time each member has participated in the Fund. Mr. Marvin Townsend, Executive Director of TML-IRP, is here tonight to present a check to the City of La Porte for $19,329.60 which represents 1 % of our 1995-96 workers' compensation contribution for each consecutive year of membership up to a maximum of 10%.. The City of La Porte is fortunate to be a part of an organization that not only provides workers' compensation, liability, and property coverage, but also provides a total risk management service which includes safety audits and training. Action Required by Council: Pose for a picture accepting a check from Mr. Marvin Townsend. Availability of Funds: General Fund _ Capital Improvement Other Water/Wastewater _ General Revenue Sharing Account Number: Funds Available: Yes No Approved for City Council A&:enda ~~~ T. ~ Robert T. Herrera City Manager l.\ ,\q -<i{P . Date e e REO&T FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDAEM Agenda Date Requested: Aoril 22 1996 Requested By: Guy Rankin (jJ~ Department: X Report Resolution X Planning Ordinance Exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. Transmittal Letter from Planning and Zoning Commission Application for Zone Change Request Staff Report Rezoning Ordinance 1501- T SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Summary The Planning & Zoning Commission, at its April 11, 1996, meeting, considered and recommended approval of Rezoning Request #R96-002. This request seeks to rezone a 4.049 acre tract out of the W.B. Root/William M. Jones Survey from Manufactured Housing (MH) to General Commercial (GC). The tract in question is part of the Pecan Plantation Mobile Home Park located at 8902 Spencer Highway. The April 11, Commission hearing constituted the first phase of the Rezoning review and approval process. The final phase will be the April 22, Public Hearing conducted by City Council. After closing the hearing, Council will consider approval of the rezoning request. In preparation for this City Council Public Hearing, staff has satisfied all public notice requirements, including a mailout to the owners of all properties located within 200 feet of the tract in question. A total of 5 notices were mailed. As of April 16, the date on which this agenda request is being prepared, no replies have been received, either in favor or against the request. If any replies are received, they will be provided to Council at the April 22, Public Hearing. Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission, by unanimous vote, has recommended approval of R96-002. Staff concurs with this recommendation. Action Required by Council: 1 . Conduct Public Hearing 2. Consider Approval of R96-002 Availability of Funds: N/A General Fund Capital Improvement Other Account Number: N/A VVater/VVastewater General Revenue Sharing Funds Available: _YES _NO Council A enda DATE \ e e ORDINANCE NO. 1501-T ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1501, MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, BY CHANGING CLASSIFICATION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE: "Section 1. The City Council of the City of La Porte hereby finds, determines and declares that heretofore, to-wit, on the 11th day of April, 1996, at 6:00 p.m. a Public Hearing was held before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of La Porte, Texas, pursuant to due notice to consider the question and the possible reclassification of the zoning classification of the hereinafter described parcels of land. There is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes, a copy of Notice of Public Hearing which the City Council of the City of La Porte hereby finds was properly mailed to all owners of all properties located within two hundred feet (200') of the properties under consideration. "Section 2. The publisher's affidavit of publication of notice of said hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "B", incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. "Section 3. Subsequent to such public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of La Porte met in regular session on the 11 th day of April, 1996, at 6:00 p.m., to consider the changes in classification which were the subject of such public hearing. The City Council of the City of La Porte is in receipt of the written recommendations of the City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, by letter O:\CLP\Ordinances\1501- T '" e e dated April 16, 1996, a true copy of which letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "C", incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. "Section 4. Subsequent to receipt of the recommendation of the City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council of the City of La Porte called a public hearing on the proposed classification changes and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 22"d day of April, 1996, at 6:00 p.m., and pursuant to due notice, to consider the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the possible reclassification of the zoning classification of the hereinafter described parcels of land. There is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "0", incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes, a copy of the notice of public hearing which the City Council of the City of La Porte hereby finds was properly mailed to the owners of all properties located within two hundred feet (200') of the properties under consideration. "Section 5. The publisher's affidavit of publication of notice of said hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "E", and incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof for all purposes. "Section 6. The City Council of the City of La Porte hereby accepts the recommendation of the City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, and the zoning classification of the hereinafter described parcels of land, situated within the corporate limits of the City of La Porte, is hereby changed in accordance therewith, and the zoning classification of said parcels of land shall hereafter be "GC - General Commercial". The description of said parcels of land rezoned to General Commercial is as follows, to-wit: O:\CLP\Ordinances\1501- T 2 e e Tract 12A, a 4.0490 acre tract out of the W. B. Root and W. M. Jones abstract A-482, La Porte, Harris County, Texas. "Section 7. The City Council of the City of La Porte hereby finds, determines, and declares that all prerequisites of law have been satisfied and hereby determines and declares that the amendments to the City of La Porte Zoning Map and Classification contained in this Ordinance as amendments to City of La Porte Zoning Ordinance No. 1501 are desirable and in furtherance of the goals and objectives stated in the City of La Porte's comprehensive plan Ordinance No. 1501 (A), Page 3. "Section 8. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the city for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof. "Section 9. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after its passage and approval. O:\CLP\Ordinances\1501- T 3 e e PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE ~~ DAY OF -4-p t-: { 1996. CITY OF LA PORTE ATTEST: By ~ L_-- SUE LENES, City Secretary O:\CLP\Ordinances\1501- T 4 e e THE STATE OF TEXAS ) COUNTY OF HARRIS ) CITY OF LA PORTE ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1501, the City of La Porte zoning Ordinance, notice is hereby given that the La Porte Planning and Zoning commission will conduct a public hearing at 6:00 P.M. on the 11th day of April, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas. The purpose of this hearing is to consider request R96-002 which has been requested for Tract 12 A, a 4.0490 acre tract out of the W. B. Root and W. M. J ones Surveys, Abstract A -482 . The property in question is more particularly described as being located at 8902 Spencer Highway. The request, which has been submitted by Heritage corporation, the property owner, seeks to have the property in question rezoned from Manufactured Housing (M.H.) to General Commercial (C.C) A regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning commission will follow the public hearing for the purpose of acting upon the public hearing items and to conduct other matters pertaining to the Planning and Zoning commission. citizens wishing to address the Commission pro or con during the Public Hearing will be required to sign in before the meeting is convened. CITY OF LA PORTE Sue Lenes City Secretary EXHIBIT "A" ORD. 1501-T 1200 Hwy. 146 Suite 180 P.O. Box 1414 e e La Porte; Texas 77571 (713) 471-1234 TheB re Sun County of Harris . State of Texas Before me, the undersigned authority, on this date came and appeared Sandra E. Bumgarner, duly authorized agent of The'Bayshore Sun, a semi-weekly newspaper published in La Porte, Harris County, Texas, and who after being duly sworn, says the attached notice was published in The Bayshore Sun of March 27, 1996 t~('L- .1 . tx-~~~~l-~ U Sandra E. Bumgarner Office Manager Sworn and subscribed before me A . D. 19 clt . this -L.L day of aPz.:( ~ ./ --./- - ~~~:~ )?1, -4-L[<-~~rr-= Harris County, Texas ...:;;' :r......-"'..............................................................................,/'....:..:.~~_ EXHIBIT ~'B-l" ORD. l501"':T e e THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS CITY OF \..A POFfrE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In accordance v'ith the provisions of OrdinanCe 1501. the City of La Porte Zoning Ordinance. notice is hereby given that the. La Porte PlaMing and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing at 6:00 p.m. on the 11th day of April. 1996. in the CounCil ~ of the City Hal. 604 West FairTT1OI1t ParkwaY. La Porte. Texas. The purpose of this hearing is consider req R96-OO2 which" h e request r ract 12A, a4. e ct~thew. Rootand. W.M. e .. stract 482. The prope in stion i more P rticularly described . bei, ocated at 8902 Spencer ig Y e request, which has been, bmitted · by Heritage Corporation,. e property owner. seeks to . haVe the property in question rezoned from Manufactured Housing (M.H.) to General . Commercial (C. C.). . .. . A regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning commission.will follow the public hearing for the 'purpose of acting upon the public hearing items and conduct other rretIeIS per1ainil9 to the P\arlni1g and Zoning Commission. Citizens wishing to address the Commission pro or con during the Public Hearing will be required to sign in before the meeting is convened. CITY OF LA PORTE Sue Lenes City Secretary EXHIBIT "B_2" ORD. 1501-T e City of La Porte Established 1892 April 16, 1996 ~.:... .- Honorable Mayor Norman Malone and City Council City of La Porte Re: Rezoning Request #R96-002 Dear Mayor Malone: The La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, during its April 11, 1996, meeting, held a public hearing to consider Rezoning Request #R96-002. The request, submitted by Larry Womack, of the Heritage Group, seeks to rezone a 4.049 acre tract out of the W.B. RootlWilliam M. Jones Survey. The tract in question is part of the Pecan Plantation Mobile Home Park and is currently zoned Manufactured Housing (MH). The applicant is requesting a rezoning to General Commercial (GC). The rezoning would restore the previous General Commercial designation that was established during the 1987 comprehensive rezoning of the City. The Planning and Zoning Commission has, by a unanimous vote, recommended that Rezoning Request #R96-002 be approved. Respectfully Submitted, ~W~ B~ %aters Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission xc: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager John Joerns, Assistant City Manager John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission EXHIBIT "e" P.L!. Bux III 'j · La ~IID'. Tl:SQ}1;:f.I57Z-1115 · (713) 471-5020 ~ e e THE STATE OF TEXAS ) . COUNTY OF HARRIS ). CITY OF LA PORTE ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1501, the city of La Porte zoning Ordinance, notice is hereby given that the La Porte city council will conduct a public hearing at. 6:00 P.K. on the 22nd day of April, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the city Hall, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas. The purpose of this hearing is to consider request R96-002 which has been requested for Tract 12 A, a 4.0490 acre tract out of the W. B. Root and W. M. Jones Surveys, Abstract A-482. The property in question is more particularly described as being located at 8902 Spencer Highway. The request, which has been submitted by Heritage Corporation, the property owner, seeks to have the property in question rezoned from Manufactured Housing (M.H.) to General Commercial (C.C) A regular meeting of the City council will follow the public hearing for the purpose of acting upon the public hearing items and to conduct other matters pertaining to the city Council. citizens wishing to address the city Council pro or con during the Public Hearing will be required to sign in before the meeting is convened. CITY OF LA PORTE Sue Lenes City Secretary EXHIBIT "D" ORD. lSOl-T e e 1200 Hwy. 146 Suite 180 P.O. Box 1414 La Pone. Texas 77571 (713) 471-1234 TheB I re Sun ''-..-. County of Harris State of Texas Before me, the undersigned authority, on this date came and appeared Sandra E. Bumgarner, duly authorized agent of The"Bayshore Sun, a semi-weekly newspaper published in La Porte, Harris County, Texas, and who after being duly sworn, says the attached notice was published in The Bayshore Sun of April 07, 1996 ia~)-,-)/c.4:..-/i&<-m c- y-d/w1..L-,-- U Sandra E. Bumgarner Office Manager Sworn and subscribed before me A.D. 19 q4, . this /::f day of ~~; ~u~~=^"_dl~~-= Notary Public Harris County, Texas .j.;;..:r.....................................................................................................r...-~~ EXHIBIT "E-l" ORD. lSOl-T e EXHIBIT "E-2" ORD. 1501-T e THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS CITY OF LA PORTE . ,NOTICE OF . PUBLIC HEARING . . . . In accordance With',the provisions of Ordinance 1501. the Clty'of La Porte Zoning Ordinance. notice is hereby given that the La Porte ,City CounCil will conduct a public hearing at 7:00 p.m: on the 22nd day of April. 1996, in the Council Chambers of the. City Hall. 604 West Fairmont Parkway; La Porte. . Texas..The pu eof the Public Healing, is to consid r rest R96-002 which has been r ed rTract~. '4.0490 acre tract 0 f e .B. RW.M. Jones SurveyS A-482: property in ques..tion.. is 0 e. larl esc. rib'ed'as being Iocat . Highway. The . request.'v.tich by Heritage : Corporation. tti property Owner, seeks to : have the prope in question rezoned from : Manufactured Housing (M.H.) to General ; CoI1lf!.l.~rC!al (G.C.).., ' '.- . . .... ',_ . . ~ >__10_' .. ~ -. .-,.... .~ ". " A r~gular.ineeting will be held fOllowing. the public heStlng for hepurpose of actillg : upon the public hearing item and conduct ; other matters pertaining to the Zoning Board of Adjus~nL , ..' ". ". . . .... . _'_'_'_:. _ . _.' '~'_ __~.,..~a.,:"'~~.''''''.':--'''' .~.. . Citizens wishing to address the BOard: pro or'cOnduring the publicHearing will be . required t08i9O in before the' meeting is ; convened. ., ..... .'.,.) .:. " . ". . ': ..~. CITY OF LA PORTE. . . r '. Sue Lenes . -~.' ,city SecretarY . .. . -' e e LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 12A,Out of W.B. Root and W-,'Jones abstract 482 4.0490 acres EXHIBIT "F" ORD. lSOl-T e City of La Porte Established 1892 April 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor Norman Malone and City Council City of La Porte Re: Rezoning Request #R96-002 Dear Mayor Malone: The La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, during its April 11, 1996, meeting, held a public hearing to consider Rezoning Request #R96-002. The request, submitted by Larry Womack, of the Heritage Group, seeks to rezone a 4.049 acre tract out of the W.B. Root/William M. Jones Survey. The tract in question is part of the Pecan Plantation Mobile Home Park and is currently zoned Manufactured Housing (MH). The applicant is requesting a rezoning to General Commercial (GC). The rezoning would restore the previous General Commercial designation that was established during the 1987 comprehensive rezoning of the City. The Planning and Zoning Commission has, by a unanimous vote, recommended that Rezoning Request #R96-002 be approved. Respectfully SU~~ B . Waters Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission xc: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager John Joerns, Assistant City Manager John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 1115 · La Porte, Texas 77572-1 115 · (713)471-5020 JAN- 4-96 THU 3:87 p.e3 . __ JAN- 2~96 rUE 14:21 e FAX NO. 7l3~7168 P,Ot > . ... CIT1 Or LA PORTE APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE REQUEST $. ~ I ( i ~ . 1 '( I ~. ~-------------------_.W_.~-------------A~~i1~;t1~~-N~~~_w~:---~~1L-~ IliUCi lJ.~g ONkJ. fe.: $100,1lll Dat. Received: k-/!-:t<P = . Reo. ipt No.; ~ -:2A''7:L 0 ( ) Site Plan () Minor Development Site plan ( ) Major Development Site Plan ( ) General plan ( ) Site Plao3 Submitted on _._-----~----------~--~------~--~--~--~------------------------------- APPLICANT' 5 NAM~; rEc.~,J Pu:\~A'TJON Address: ~O). SPt;~(,~ i-\\~h~~_ Oat e: t . ~~-4~ S ignat,\.\ra: OWNER'S NAt1E: . H f::iZ. n,~~c 6Rcu~ Addre3s; l)"o V" Lr..~J")b~ A;C[f.,KMAU I" l..{t6}Jc -..-.---- ..- - - PH: Lf71-S33:L ~tW.A.~~_ ~ ----- P I'opo~ed Usa g,e: #= ~eque~ted Zone CnaoBe; SIC No. ~~7~ NEW ~ USE~ 1\1 ANLtFtkTUREb Hilt1SiNG Sfr/=.~LoT PH: :l!q~ S~~~ >>1 S~e Attech~d A NO ..b-c)R R.'j . ATION ON MY BEHALF. vL< GA. . Propcr.ty Legal Pesor1pt1on; ~- WM THE O\~NER OF T~lg HeREIN DESCRIB~D PROPERT'! Off\~C< '" 15 AUTHORIZED 1'0 FILE ,THIS APPL! Date: l-~-q~ Signature: Zone: 1!J# __---..----.-.-----------~--------~-~-----~..H--~-.--.---------------- ----------------------------------------------------~-----------._~--- 9fF1Cf.; US~ ONLY 1) Planning & loning~ (0) Preliminary Meeting w ,(0) Pub11C Hear1nB/Mtg, - -4/(ilcfY~ Recommendation: :L; CfrtVL{;V;J.::-_- .' . I A D P 11 con t, N c to 1. f1 e d of D & t e ( s ) ~ < )"5 t H t ~ . () 2 n d M t g . Adjo1nina Property Owner, Not~fled: I --...-.-.~.-..- 2) City CO\Hlc11: (a) (b) Regul~r Meetins - I . pub 11? He a r 1 ng/t4tg. - ~ ,4/ ::'-;l,l'-U~' Adopted by Amendrllen \:. Ord. iJ 1501 - --- -- Approv~d ( Denied ( ) ) CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE JAN- 4-96 THIJ 3:08 p.a4 e FA:, NO, 71341168 P.02 JAN- 2-96 rUE 14:21 ;. App110ant NQ~lried or Date(e): ( ) tot Mtg. Adjoining Property owner5 Notified; PAGE. 2 i I ( ) 2nd MtS. I I - I , Denied ( >. ~ - lONE CHAHGE REQUEST Thi3 Appl1cation 18: Approved ( ) Permit No. _ Comment': ~_-r-- --.....-------....- .J ___ In"'" On ,,~ \ e e ATTACHMENT TO APP1.ICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE REQUEST PECAN PLANTATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 12A,Out of W.B. Root and W.'Jones abstract 482 4.0490 acres e e Staff Report Rezoning Request #R96-002 April 11, 1996 Requested for: Property Description: Requested by: 4.049 acre tract out of the W.B. RootIWilliam M. Jones Survey, which is further described as being located in the 8902 Spencer Highway. (See Exhibit A) See Exhibit The Heritage Group, Property Owner Requested Zone Change: From Manufactured Hou';;ing (MH) to General Commercial (GC) Background: The tract in question is part of the Pecan Plantation Mobile Horne Park. It is specifically the paved & fenced area that previously had served as a manufactured housing sales lot for the Mobile Horne Park. The present MH zoning designation has been in place since March 1989, when are-zoning requested by the former owner was granted. Prior to the 1989 rezoning, the tract was zoned General Commercial or (GC). This was the designation established by the 1987 comprehensive rezoning of the City. The rezoning sought by the current property owners would restore the previous General Commercial designation. In acting upon a rezoning Request, the Planning and Zoning Commission and in turn, City Council, are charged to consider the following factors: . Was the current zoning designation reasonable? . Was any error made in the assignment of the current zoning? . Is the requested designation compatible with the intent and goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan? It is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate whether any of these criteria have been satisfied. Purpose: Analysis: Conclusion: e e The applicant seeks to open a business that would sell new and used manufactured housing from the proposed tract. The previous owner of the property requested the MH designation in 1989 to expand Pecan Plantation, a mobile homes park. The expansion of the mobile home park never occurred, and the Park was sold. The new owners request that the property be changed to GC, which was the previous zoning classification of the property. This request is somewhat unusual in that it seeks to restore the zoning designation that was assigned to the subject tract at the time of the 1987 comprehensive rezoning. As is illustrated on Exhibit A, the tract in question is located between two General Commercial Tracts. The request creates and would maintain a General Commercial Corridor in accordance with the Citys Comprehensive Plan. The area in which the subject tract is located is one that, based on the criteria established by the City's Comprehensive Plan, is suitable for either the present MH, or the requested GC zoning. The Zoning change would not have a significant impact on traffic conditions in the area. Moreover, utilities would not significantly be affected. The request for a rezoning of the above mentioned property would change the property from MH to GC. The GC designation would allow for a contiguous GC zone along this portion of Spencer highway. If the applicants are able to demonstrate that the requested zoning, the commission should grant the rezoning request. The change would not be contrary to the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. - \ I , e ........L. .. ~ ...,- ::..: ~u( ~::. ;j:. ;-.:" ~\/~: .);....] ~ I . . / / / :::;FE~\~GEF~ '0 .. .,. . i~"~",!'; 'o( \ E'. S"C/:..T F::::: / / . :...:......, .-. :. : :0.0 i::.:...':U\: \: . 1 ;:: \ ::":~ ~".XT f.:.T \ :j": ~""~ \. ..-. .. . ., ., . ..... . :::: PE}.r',jV \ C ~~. / \ \I 8 "QlIT'O~'" 3 9 ~ 12 CA U:TT LIl. 13 14 ~VEA'T LIl. . 15 16 AliI.. OW I./(. 17 18 18 ORCHARD ,92 \ 69~ / \--T- I 701 ~ f;-i-~ 706 r---:--' II \ L_l_-J 710 711 712 \713 / , . 696 697 698 6 14 15 "I!.!. 17 ~. 22 clf.4 h 23 695 o !: s " o ~ co 70S 704 703 702 701 \~ 30 IlUSTl C 33 SHf:L~ 36 Iloa:l 717 \ \ 29 \7~ 714 715 716 718 \ : ~ E ::> -' ~_. _._-_._._._._._-_._._._._._-_._.~._._-_._._-_._.~---- .J ,- ';' ~ BAYPO"" INDUSTRIAL DIST. L'~" Vi ~ I FAIR9AOOK 1001< 4 \ II 1 Y I ... E C L " F~\ 1 ~:"{ ~...:\}".rc ..... .... .. ~~.::\ ~.< ~'::.. .... ......... -.;v :::.:::. / / 1 --r ( ~ . / .-- - . / r- I ____-J / / e e l .4u<."2~:;''' :,..;~:- G( AREA OF REZONING REQUEST #R96-002 /GC ,~;c.~,:*-"'t:<:i~~'~ -~,_,~:~".~-,__.;-h_'_--''''''-';;<':_:-/''-<'~-:' Gel '7>:i:<.~'::,'='t :i-,~"":":"';'''"' MH R-2 R-l R-2 w.NC . .____,...._.)~:~::::S:g;jtf:~t~:::.:.~:.':::: R-2 ,_:,;><::,.::,:_,.". '''''Of>>;. .,:,':-.::f:.':;;i.~:,,:::.;-,;,:,:,~:::' ,*,::::~;';":;"'>;;:i;";:;i%.-::. ",,;:,::r;..'_':"':".>i;'.:':;': ~ / EXHIBIT 1\ e REO&T FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDa-EM Agenda Date Requested: Aoril 22. 1996 Requested By: GUY Rankin ~ Department: X Report Resolution Planning Ordinance Exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Transmittal Letter from Planning and Zoning Commission Special Conditional Use Permit Application Staff Report Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU96-001 Public Notice Replies SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Summary The Planning & Zoning Commission, at its March 21, 1996, meeting, considered and recommended approval of Special Conditional Use (SCU) Permit Request #SCU96- 001. The permit is requested for the construction of a 61 unit senior citizen assisted living center to be located in the 8700-8800 block of Fairmont Parkway. The March 21, Commission hearing constituted the first phase of the SCU review and approval process. Several citizen comments in opposition were received. During the Hearing, the SCU Permit process and conditions were explained which included requirements for the Intra-District PUD process, which limits type, size and use. After staff's and the developer's report, many concerns were addressed and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended a favorable consideration. The final phase will be the April 22, Public Hearing conducted by City Council. After closing the hearing, Council will consider approval of the SCU Permit. In preparation for this City Council Public Hearing, staff has satisfied all public notice requirements, including a mailout to the owners of all properties located within 200 feet of the tract in question. A total of 52 notices were mailed. As of April 16, the date on which this agenda request is being prepared, no replies have been received, either in favor or against the request. If any replies are received, they will be provided to Council at the April 22, Public Hearing. Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission, by unanimous vote, has recommended approval of SCU96-001, subject to the specified conditions including requirements for an Intra- Staff concurs with this District PUD, which limits type, size, and use. recommendation. Action Required by Council: 1 . Conduct Public Hearing 2. Consider Approval of SCU96-001 Availability of Funds: N/A General Fund Capital Improvement Other Account Number: N/A Approved for City Council Agenda R(/l~era C y anager VVater/VVastewater General Revenue Sharing Funds Available: _YES _NO ~/)'O / (t l f DATE e e CITY OF LA PORTE Permit No. SCU96-001 N/A SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CLP Job No. ORDINANCE 1501 This permit is issued to: Decker McKim. RE/MAX Southeast (Agent) On Behalf of John Mariner (Trustee) Owner or Agent 6019 Fairmont Parkway. Ste. B. Pasadena. TX 77505 Address For Development of: Senior Citizen Assisted Living Center Development Name 8700-8800 Blocks of Fairmont Parkway. La Porte. Texas Address Legal Description: 5.637 acres out of the W.M. Jones Survey: Abstract 482 Zoning: Intra-District P. D.O. within an R-2 Zone Permit Conditions Failure to begin construction within one (1) year after issuance or as scheduled under the terms of a special conditional use permit shall void the permit as approved, except upon an extension of time granted after application to the Planning and Zoning Commission. If construction is terminated after the completion of any stage and there is ample evidence that further development is not contemplated the ordinance establishing such special conditional use permit may be rescinded by the City Council, upon it's own motion or upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of La Porte, and the previous zoning of the entire tract shall be in full effect on the portion which is undeveloped. Additional Conditions - See Exhibit -A- Validation Date: 4/22/96 City Secretary e e SCU96-001 - Special Terms and Conditions 1. Any development beyond that currently presented will reqUIre a separate Special Conditional Use Permit. 2. No changes, or amendments shall be made to the recorded site plan and covenants without fIrst obtaining authorization from the City of La Porte. 3. It should be noted in the Special Conditional Use Permit and in the deed covenants that the use of this property is limited to a 61 unit "senior citizen" assisted living center, as defIned in SIC 8361. For these purposes, a senior citizen is defined as a person who is 55 years of age or older. . 4. PUD would be limited to a single story residential development. 5. All density patterns shall not exceed that of R-2 Zoning. 6. Staffs Report dated 3/21/96, shall serve as the minimum requirements for the P.U.D. EXHIBIT A e City of La Porte Established 1892 April 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor Norman Malone and City Council City of La Porte Re: Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-001 Dear Mayor Malone: The La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, during its March 21, 1996, meeting, held a public hearing to consider Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-001. This permit has been requested by Lewis Cline, of Care Concepts of East Texas, Inc., for the property located in the 8700-8800 Block of Fairmont Parkway. The purpose of the permit is to allow construction of a 61 unit senior citizen Assisted Living Center. The conditions that staff recommended be attached to this permit are as follows: . Any development beyond that currently presented will require a separate Special Conditional Use Permit. . No changes, or amendments shall be made to the recorded site plan and covenants without first obtaining authorization from the City of La Porte. . It should be noted in the Special Conditional Use Permit and in the deed covenants that the use of this property is limited to a 61 unit "senior citizen" assisted living center, as defined in SIC 8361. For these purposes, a senior citizen is defined as a person who is 55 years of age or older. The Planning and Zoning Commission has, by a unanimous vote, recommended that Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-001 be approved. R. es~tfully Sub,!'l~ ,~/LCY0~ , ~-.r Waters Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission xc: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager John Joorns, Assistant City Manager John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission P.o. Box 1115 · La Porte. Texas 77572-1115 · (713) 471-5020 DECKER McKIM REALTORS 4871729 P.02 e CITY OF LA FORTE e APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT --~------------------------------------A~~1~~;t1~~-N~:~-~-ii:~~()oC== OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: t100.00 Date Received: Receipt No.: Certified Plans Subm1tted~ . ( ). General Plan C) Major Development Site Plan ( ), Minor Development Site Plan ( ) preliminary Plat -~-~-------__________~___~________________--___~--__M______~_______-__ Decker.' T\t.-..Tl"h" Per~on Making Request: ~~~II Ma i.ling Add rass : 6019 Fai~nt. l?arkway' City/State: BUSINESS NAME: PROpERTY ADDR~SS: Pasadena., Texas 77505 Phone: (713) 471.-.3633 RE,.1W{ Southeast Fai:.rm:>nt Parkway., near 'Hunte;rs T:r;ace LEGAL DESCR1PTIO~; ZO N'~ : . See attached legal & survey' SIC USE CATEGORY~ Assisted Hsalth Care TYPE OF BUSINESS: 1/26(96 Dat.e ---~~~----~~----~---------~_"_____________~_____~____~~___~W_~_~~~~___ OFFJ:CE ll~E ON!,.1 Dabo of P & Z Public Hearing: I Recommendation: ~ or N Date of City Council Meeting: lon~: _ Approved: Y O~ N CLP JOB f Approved < ) Permit f1~ elf Assigneo Yet) D~flied ( ) Thi$ applioation 1s: I Conditior)S: Lon1og Admln~stracor uat.e CED/1-'ST ! . e e Staff Report March 21, 1996 Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-001 (Revised Submittal) . Requested for: A 5.637 acre tract of property out of the W.M. Jones Survey, Abstract 482, which is further described as being located in the 8700-8800 Block of Fairmont Parkway. (See Exhibit A) Requested by: Care Concepts of East Texas, Inc., Lewis Cline Purpose of Request: To allow construction of a 61 unit senior citizen Assisted Living Center. Backap-ound: The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its February 15, 1996, meeting, conducted a public hearing for the purpose of taking citizen comment regarding Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-OOl. After taking comments and questions, the Commission suspended the hearing with the intention of re-opening it at the March 21, 1996, meeting. The request is now being brought back to the Commission in a somewhat amended form. It is now being presented as an intra-district P.U.D. As such, it still requires a Special Conditional Use Permit. The need for rezoning, however, is eliminated. The facility itself is still proposed to contain 61 units housed in a single, one story building. Analysis: An intra-district P.U.D. is simply a P.U.D. development located in a district zoned something other than P. U . D. When considering an intra-district P. U . D., adherence to performance standards is one of the primary concerns. Using this request as an example, the proposed facility has an assigned SIC use code of 8361. This use code is listed as conditional in R-3 zones and not permitted in R-2 zones. The tract in question is zoned R-2. As an intra-district P.U.D., the issue is not whether the use is allowed in an R-2 zone, but rather, will the specific facility being proposed conform with performance standards applicable within R-2 zones. In addition to performance standards there are a number of development standards that are specified by the Zoning Ordinance. These standards are applicable to all P. U.D. developments. Discussion of these issues follows: Site Plan Planning and Zoning Commission e SCU96-OO I Page 2 of 9 e The Zoning Ordinance specifies that a Minor Development Site Plan be submitted in conjunction with a P.U.D. request. In the case of this project, the Minor Development Site Plan should be prepared in a form that is proper for filing and recordation with the Harris County Department of Deed Records. This has not been done as of yet~ The applicant has, however, provided a detailed architectural site plan that provides a substantial portion of the information required for review of the application. While final approval of the P. U. D. should be withheld until the site plan is submitted, reviewed and approved, the site plan currently in the City's possession is adequate for determining overall compliance with ordinance guidelines. A summary of the site plan/submittal packet follows. Ordinance requirements are shown in bold face type. . The entire outline, overall dimensions and area of the tract described in the application. This information is properly noted and satisfies ordinance parameters. . The use, zoning and ownership of all adjacent properties within one hundred feet (100') of the tract boundaries including the location of all structures thereon and the right-oC-way widths of all adjacent public roadways. This information is not shown. . The existing and proposed topography of the tract with contour intervals not greater than 1 foot (1'). This information is not shown. . The location, general exterior dimensions and approximate gross floor areas of all proposed buildings, or where appropriate, examples of housing units to be built on lots. This information is shown on the building construction plans submitted by the applicant and satisfies applicable ordinance and Building Code requirements . . The type of each use proposed to occupy each building and the approximate amount of building floor are devoted to each separate use, if appropriate. This information is shown on the building construction plans shown by the applicant and satisfies applicable code and ordinance requirements. . The proposed location, arrangement and number of automobile Planning and Zoning COmmiSSiOne SCU96-OO1 Page 3 of 9 e parking stalls, or appropriate examples for each housing type. The applicant's site plan indicates 65 parking spaces. The Zoning Ordinance requires (based on 61 units), fifteen tenant spaces, plus one per staff member. Staff member parking would be based on maximum employees working on a single shift and not total employees. . The proposed location, arrangement and general dimensions of all truck loading facilities, if appropriate. Loading bay location and configuration are acceptable. . The location and dimensions of all vehicular entrances, exits and driveways and their relationship to all existing or proposed district or development examples for each housing type. Driveway access to the P.U.D. will be from Fairmont Parkway. Driveway, locations, dimensions, and configurations are adequate. . The location and dimensions of all walls, fences, and plantings designed to screen the proposed district or development from adjacent uses. More information is needed regarding these issues. They will be discussed in greater detail in subsequent sections of this report. . The general drainage system. This information has not yet been provided. . Standards for exterior signs, architectural style, landscape concepts, and other variables which will be controlled in the design of buildings in the development area. This information has not yet been provided. . Proposed exterior architectural elevations illustrating the basic design elements and material appearances. This information has been provided as part of the project's building construction plans submittal. Construction Schedule . The applicant shall submit a proposed schedule of construction. If the construction of the proposed Planned Unit Development is to be in stages, then the components contained in each stage must be clearly Planning and Zoning Commissio. SCU96-OO1 Page 4 of 9 e delineated. In addition, the Developer or Subdivider must submit a General Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City of La Porte Development Ordinance. Said General Plan shall be submitted prior to the submission of a Development Site Plan or Preliminary Plat, as the case may be. The development schedule shall indicate the approximate starting date and the approximate completion date of the complete Development Plan. This information has not yet been provided. Minimum Proiect Size . The tract of land for which a Planned Unit Development-General Residential project is proposed and permit requested shall contain not less than five (5) acres of land. The tract in question consists of 5.637 acres. Required Frontage . The tract of land for which a project is proposed and permit requested shall not have less than two hundred feet (200') of frontage on a public right-of-way. The tract in question has 254 feet of frontage along Fairmont Parkway. Yards . The front, rear and side yard restrictions at the periphery of the Planned Unit Development site, at a minimum, shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts. The setbacks proposed for the facility are approximately 67 feet to the front, approximately 616 feet to the rear, 64 feet to the east side, and 10 feet to the west side. These setbacks satisfy R-2 requirements (30 feet front, 20 feet rear, 10 feet side). There is, however, an additional setback provision that will be discussed in the next paragraph. . No building shall be nearer than its building height to the rear or side property line when such line abuts an "R-l" or "R-2" use direct. Based on a review of the building construction plans that have been submitted to the city, it appears the proposed building will be twelve feet in height. This is when measured as specified by Zoning Ordinance Section 3-100 (page 11). This will require that the setback adjacent to the Planning and Zoning Commission e SCU96-OO1 Page 5 of 9 e P. U . D's western boundary line be increased by two feet from ten to twelve feet. . No buildi!1g shall be located less than fifteen feet (15') from the back of the curb line along those roadways which are part of the internal street pattern. This will be discussed in a subsequent section of this report. It may be necessary to dedicate a private street within the facility. If this. is done, it will be necessary to increase the separation between the eastern face of the building and the driveway that would become a private road. Landscaping and Screening . The entire site other than that taken up be structures or landscaping shall be surfaced with a material to control dust and drainage. All open areas of the property that are not landscaped or paved will be grassed. Grass provides adequate dust control. . A drainage system subject to the approval of the Director of Planning shall be installed. A Minor Development Site Plan must be submitted for this project. Drainage plans will be specified on the site plan. . Developments abutting an "R-l", "R-2", "R-3" or MH district shall be screened and landscaped in compliance with required screening and landscaping for the specific use involved as required in Sections 6 & 7, Table B. The northern and western faces of the property in question abut the Brookglen Subdivision. The eastern face abuts undeveloped R-2 property. These property faces will require landscape screening. The screening plants must be evergreen and of a type and size that they can be reasonably expected to form an effective visual screen within two years of planting. The final planting plan, which must receive approval from the Director of Planning, will be considered a component of the overall landscape plan. Property Controls . In order that the purpose of this section may be achieved, the property shall be in single ownership or under the management and supervision of a central authority or otherwise subject to such supervisory lease or ownership control as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Ordinance. Plamring and Zoning COmmiSSiOne SCU96-OO1 Page 6 of 9 e . Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tract, townhouse, apartment, or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent documents shall be fIled with the City of La Porte; said filing with the City to be made prior to the filing of said declaration or documents or plans with the recording officers of Harris County. . Prior to recording in Harris County Deed Records, approval of the City of La Porte shall be secured as to the documents described in paragraph (b) above. . The declaration of covenants, conditions or restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses, or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. Although this facility is, for the present, to consist of a single building under single ownership, staff recommends that the property be bound by covenants, prepared and filed in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraphs. Specific terms of the covenants should include the following: . Tenancy shall be restricted to persons aged 55, or older. . Clear responsibility for maintenance of landscaping, screening, fencing, and undeveloped portions of the property. . Clear responsibility for maintenance of all stormwater drainage systems located on site including swales, channels, and detention facilities. . Clear responsibility for maintenance of private roads located with the P.D.D. . A clear statement specifying and limiting the future use of undeveloped portions of the property. . Architectural standards (buildings and signage). . The funding mechanism to be used to provide for maintenance items specified by covenants. . A clear statement specifying the parties responsible for administration and enforcement of covenants. These covenants should be submitted for review and comment by the City Planning and Zoning COmmiSSiOne SCU96-OO1 Page 7 of 9 e Attorney's office. They should not be released for recordation until such time as the City Attorney deems them to be satisfactory in terms of form and content. No building permit for the project should be approved or released until the approved covenants have been filed for rec~rdation with Harris County Deed Records. Public Services The proposed project shall be served by the City water and sewer system and fIre hydrants shall be installed at such locations as necessary to provide fll"e protection. Proposed utility connections shall be subject to approval by the Director of Phmning. As has been noted, prior to final approval of the project, a Minor Development Site Plan must be prepared and submitted to the City for review and approval. Specific utility connection points will be evaluated as part of the site plan review. For the purposes of this report, however, staff would note the following: . Sanitary sewer, in adequate capacity to serve the facility, is available from the adjacent Brookglen Subdivision. As proposed, sewer demand from the facility will not impact the ability to provide service to future R-2 development in the area. . Potable water is not readily available, but can be extended to serve the site. Although they can be handled under the umbrella of a single request, what in essence will be two separate extensions will be required. The first will make water available by extending water along the Fairmont Parkway property face. The second extension will be for the purpose of providing internal fire protection to the facility. This extension must run north from Fairmont Parkway and will ultimately have one or more fire hydrants installed on it. The line and hydrants must be located within a dedicated utility easement. The easement should extend through the full depth of the tract. This is for the purpose of providing access for future water and fire protection to adjacent undeveloped property located both within and outside the boundaries of the subject tract. Roadways Private roadways within the project shall have an improved surface to twenty four feet (24') or more in width and shall be so designed as to permit the City fll"e trucks to provide protection to each building. No portion of this required twenty four foot (24') road system may be used in calculating required off-street parking space or be used for parking. As presently designed, there are no private roads within the facility's perimeters. The northern portion of the tract is to remain undeveloped at this time. Future access must, however, be provided for as part of the facility's initial design Planning and Zoning COmmiSSione SCU96-OO1 Page 8 of 9 e process. As presently drawn, the facility site plan indicates a twenty foot wide driveway that is to be located along the eastern face of the building. It appears that this drive is intended to provide access to the rear of the facility as well as the undeveloped portion of the site. Under the circumstances, staff would recommend the following: . The driveway be treated as a private access road; and . As such, it be widened to 24 feet in order to provide access for emergency vehicles. Performance or "density intensity" standards in effect within R-2 zones are established by Ordinance Section 5-700. Based on the 61 units proposed for the facility and the 5.637 acres available, overall density will be 10.8 units per acre. This is very close to the 10 unit per acre limit established for quadreplex townhomes, one of the highest density permitted R-2 uses. Future units constructed on the undeveloped portion of the site would of course significantly impact overall density and would, therefore, require careful review and consideration. Future development should also hold to R-2 Density parameters. Staff would recommend as a condition of the SCU approval, that any site development beyond that which is presently proposed, require a new SCU permit. Conclusion: The application for SCU96-OO1 substantially complies with ordinance requirements. However, due to outstanding items, it would be premature to recommend City Council approval. Staff will be willing to recommend approval (with certain conditions) once the following items have been addressed. . A Minor Development Site Plan has been reviewed and approved by the City. . Side building setbacks have been adjusted as necessary. . Internal access to the northern portion of the tract is adequately provided for by provision of a private street (minimum width, 24 feet). . Adequate provisions are made for fire protection and potable water service to the interior portions of the tract. . P. U . D. covenants are submitted for City review and approval. . Adequate landscape/screening plans are developed. Planning and Zoning Commission tit SCU96-OO1 Page 9 of 9 e The conditions to be attached to approval would be as follows: . Any development beyond that currently presented will require a separate Special Conditional Use Permit. . No changes, or amendments shall be made to the recorded site plan and covenants without first obtaining authorization from the City of La Porte. EXHIBIT A ~~7 PCPe c:::ur' ~_~1!'L 1'<#_ u....~1)l. __-=aue 1.'S:;:Cn:~ _ .&.~~~1nWns. -_~~. ~lbJtIatI't).. A.lIt.I -----::... "'~.fI'Vow -:.___ .D.$J::5~4&.L11J;~:..-_ .frtt:#1'QrrtoIl'6'-&Uw 1.1o:t1...fi~5i~..u,~-U5 &~1"1JtN - :--q.0z:I0l~~~~- --p6tf.P.:ta.6.b'.-.n::LG ~ "'"'" ""='''''"' . - "-!WI'. '/&Jr4 A;,F'. ~ 1!~~...Ji...l.L:__ """'''''''"''''''''"'- e [ ! ~ f ! ; , * ;,. t ~ '" ~ 't"",,~-= ~~PIi6'1N'-~.!:ll1~ ---- I I i I: I'~' " " " . I ----~ e .... 'i, ~,.. C.f: A'EETING OF THE LA POR~ Planning and Zoning Commission (Type of Meeting) HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) R~4jY~,~ PLANNING __ Special Conditional Use Request #SCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEwED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND ,// I AM ',/ IN FAVOR OF OR I AM IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TillS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: fl., \:J) . 1, IJ i~1wt~ Y SIGNA TURE /ys; tJ/r~t'/tJUX NAME (pLEASE PRINT) 1[7)- / !) rei\ ~/{/! L:/l-P_ HOME ADDRESS ks Po / Ie, 11, II ,5,-;/ I AttmETING OF THE LA POR" Planninl: and Zoninl: Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) ~~:x~ .a 9 PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR Special Conditional Use Request HSCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) --' I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM X IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TillS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: f 4... dfl's-c~ -to d"y -Iy,. ..,~c hN'.rrl:,"t M4-;o ~ ~) fit ( 1"8 .flo.~I.'., ,,~:<I.1t f~/ Ylpa( Nt y<<s:ckllc.e. n 't ~ V rf r """ <a,,'... J .. S \J'J.y ;r ""~ u el +0 Lo. ~12:t (-I- ~ - ~ (l (t'J]- ~ SIGNATURE Sf*"v~,. e {I..... n~4 NAME (pLEASE PRINT) '6~tJ' OYr"6~d LA/' HOME ADDRESS LILPf)(iI~ r,x ~ ;> 7~ ,/ AmETING OF THE LA PORI Planninl: and Zoninl: Commission (Type of Meeting) HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) RtqE\'{~P. ~ p'-"NN\NG Special Conditional Use Request HSCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM /~ IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TIllS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: JJdJ ~ ffINv ~ Ii~ , ~. IA.~ : .' SIGNA . 'J trJv1 E5 Mi!-rRr:l/ e;( ~ NAME (pLEASE P 9E3tB O~A-Rr::> LAN~ HOME ADDRESS LA-t7'6~~' qy 7757/ J AttmETING OF THE LA POR,f Planning and Zoning Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) R~1/~D . ~ PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR Special Conditional Use Request HSCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HAVE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABO~ZRENCED PUBUC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM \ IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TIllS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: J/ d 4t 1 ^ Iii .../' . 1. / / . phPtd W', b~ ~ rk.~ &'.7iu I!~ Pi fI.e :17,;;'0 fAX"j'CkJ UA:i c1 'h?f>h4d c41'utd a ~ 10 tJlt/'J'-4'~//~ h~~ {'u~~.j (~ '11.triAW!. ///1 tJl; ?U0 ~ ?7?Jo IlJ!od cr ~.-d- ~ <(Ii: 4'/~~~~ /A-~uac<d C'~,J ur CV/t- tict;vU /lJ/.J/db/JM ~.. d~o(?Jf( Lldu C SIGNATURE IN-1fIE:3 C ftl;' L LEt< NAME (pLEASE PRINT) 7736 F/fIKOPooI< LA(u~ HOME ADDRESS LI1 PORIE TX. 7757/ AttrnETING OF THE LA PORtI HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR - PLANNING Plannin2 and Zonin2 Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) S-pecial Conditional Use Request #SCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM . // IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TIllS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: ~ €Q P ..t~t1.. A{(Ji.- A rZE. SX {J EJ..J'it:A L ~~ SIGNA TURE AU4#$L .4. Ao/At> NAME (pLEASE PRINT) f'f~ 7 OLCH~ t.;J. HOME ADDRESS . ~ -'.ifuf2..Ii." (x 77)7 ( AmETING OF THE LA PORI Planning and Zoning Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) R]?J)'1!D PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR Special Conditional Use Request #SCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND !,./ I AM IN FA VOR OF OR I AM IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING TIllS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: \~ JLJa to ~ ~ l\t!l-CcJ-t1,J--.J O-UC'- l}u~+-fu_1U~ ~_ I ~. _ ! ~~\ ~ \. L. .L. L .on L'--'tA. J. t...~:..../ \. ! t~,\~ JcJ(t CJ~ (j - ili ' ~V(t-rn SIGN~TURE ~dnCL n1~'Jam NAME (pLEASE PRINT) 87'S Co-r-tl ttou1C HOME' ADDRESS lt~1r k T( 7-75;) ~ ' ~ETING OF THE LA POR. Plannin~ and Zonin~ Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) ~?%f PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR S{)ecial Conditional Use Request #SCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HAVE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM ~ IN oPPOSmON OF GRANTING TillS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: I. DI2C/dtUL JJc. ';!J~ ~ . J . ~ (iLl aA-LM~ TI 0 tll1tL VulnL. .? . ~ ~ c.JJ-zLU ~ ~ .buJ )Jltth~ MaMfJa ~ et J:t. t21unJ d J;wJi.- --;:f;t t'^-':l..tVA-irnnr -::::: '91t ~y PCUld. 'tf1z0 JJ-u..M udo <IlL ~~" ~ ~ ifuJJJLtt SI ~TURE !lJrmt1LL ~ I\{\ Io{ett NAME (P PRINT) 311S (j(OO)(!DJn1L HOME ADDRESS LCl P 0('1 e))7\ 1757/ LETING OF THE LA PORI Plannin~ and Zonin~ Commission (Type of Meeting) HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR C~~i~ ~ :; ..........0.:- -,.........-'. March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) v,f '1'. ~""JING ? ~'.: :~. ~\~ :.',01;. 'i,; ~~.:.! ~... -If. ,; Special Conditional Use Request #SCU96-001 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM --X-- IN oPPOSmON OF GRANTING TillS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: aLl G4~eL-- zfg,~/?pf/L NAME (pLEASE PRINT) J7~ Q/2C/!;/J/2-D L,u HOME ADDRESS ~ H/l-re) /k 7707 / SIGNA LETING OF THE LA PORI PlanninJ: and ZoninJ: Commission (Type of Meeting) March 21. 1996 (Meeting Date) RECEIVED 51>0 ! 9 ~ I , PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR Special Conditional Use Request #SCU96-OO1 (Type of Request) I HAVE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM X IN oPPOSmON OF GRANTING THIS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1-4 ~J_.-\ c\ ~\\ be o...h.. a:.~i-\ ~-\ ~r\eJ.x.. ~OC\ ~,--\d ~c\r3. \. 1 b~ opo~pd ~ .~ ~.-\-\o\I.L ~~,c~ ~l-lC bt"\.~ ma(~ (' ~\.~e... -\D cu....l ~-.reD- ~u~~ SIGNATURE -E..dd\~ \~\ \ ~\saf\ NAME (pLEASE PRINT) ~~2..3 brDo~",d"Ix- HOME ADDRESS Lo... -Po ~ \- c \'f. II S, l e e REO.ST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDa-EM Agenda Date Requested: Aoril 22. 1996 Requested By: Guv Rankin l~ Department: X Report Resolution Planning Ordinance Exhibits: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Transmittal Letter from Planning and Zoning Commission Special Conditional Use Permit Application Staff Report Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU96-002 Public Notice Replies SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Summary The Planning & Zoning Commission, at its April 11, 1996, meeting, considered and recommended approval of Special Conditional Use (SCU) Permit Request #SCU96- 002. The permit is requested for the construction of an off-site parking lot to be located in the 200 block of North 15th Street. The April 11, Commission hearing constituted the first phase of the SCU review and approval process. The final phase will be the April 22, Public Hearing conducted by City Council. After closing the hearing, Council will consider approval of the SCU Permit. In preparation for this City Council Public Hearing, staff has satisfied all public notice requirements, including a mailout to the owners of all properties located within 200 feet of the tract in question. A total of 10 notices were mailed. As of April 16, the date on which this agenda request is being prepared, no replies have been received, either in favor or against the request. If any replies are received, they will be provided to Council at the April 22, Public Hearing. Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission, by unanimous vote, has recommended approval of SCU96-002, subject to the specified condition. Staff concurs with this recommendation. Action Required by Council: 1 . Conduct Public Hearing 2. Consider Approval of SCU96-002 Availability of Funds: N/A General Fund Capital Improvement Other Account Number: N/A Water/Wastewater General Revenue Sharing Funds Available: _YES _NO ADDroved for Citv Council Aqenda ~~errera i Manager itl;8/16 I ' DATE I. e e CITY OF LA PORTE Permit No. SCU96-002 SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CLP Job No. N/A ORDINANCE 1501 This permit is issued to: Lindsay Pfeiffer Owner or Agent PO Box 1116. La Porte. Texas 77572-1116 Address For Development of: Pfeiffer & Son. Inc. offsite parking lot (SIC 1731) Development Name In the 200 Block of North 15th Street. La Porte. Texas Address Legal Description: Lots 11-22. Block 687: Town of La Porte Zoning: Light Industrial Permit Conditions Failure to begin construction within one (1) year after issuance or as scheduled under the terms of a special conditional use permit shall void the permit as approved, except upon an extension of time granted after application to the Planning and Zoning Commission. If construction is terminated after the completion of any stage and there is ample evidence that further development is not contemplated the ordinance establishing such special conditional use permit may be rescinded by the City Council, upon it's own motion or upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of La Porte, and the previous zoning of the entire tract shall be in full effect on the portion which is undeveloped. Additional Conditions - See Exhibit ~ Validation Date: 91,~c~ )1, . Ie /'ector of Planning ~~ City Secretary , e e SCU96-002 - Special Terms and Conditions 1. Issuance of a building permit for the parking lot is contingent upon the applicant receiving City Council approval for closing the alley of Block 687. EXHIBIT A . e City of La Porte Established 1892 April 16, 1996 Honorable Mayor Norman Malone and City Council City of La Porte Re: Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-002 Dear Mayor Malone: The La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission, during its April 11, 1996, meeting, held a public hearing to consider Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-002. This permit has been requested by Lindsay Pfeiffer for Lots 11-22, Block 687; Town of La Porte. The purpose of the permit is to allow construction of an off-site parking lot. A condition that staff recommended for this permit is that the permit for construction of the parking lot be withheld until the applicant has received approval from the City Council for the closure of the alley in Block 687. The Planning and Zoning Commission has, by a unanimous vote, recommended that Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-002 be approved. 4;:;~~ Betty T. ~ers Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission xc: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager John Joerns, Assistant City Manager John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 11]5 · La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 · (713)471-5020 - CITY OF LA PORTE e . APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT --------------------------~--------------------------------~--------- Application No.: C;~- OO,;L OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: ,$100.00 Date Received: a3-J4-Qt;, Rece ipt No.: ~.3CJ';)"3 C, Certified Plans Submitted: . ( ) General Plan () MajOr Developmen~ Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site ,Plan (v1 Preliminary Plat p;;~~~-M;~i~~-R;~~;~t~---Lt::~~~-~-~-~~-------------------------- , \ Ma-iling Address: ? 0 ~ Uu?-O l \. l ~ City/State: l-~~b l\...-t-~ Phone: ~~ l- ~GZ-c. ~~ ~~(L~ ~~;) ~~~~ \\\.e N~ \~\-~ BUSINESS NAME: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZO NE : TYPE OF BUSINESS: ~/ ~{;e~ l~h I, 2-,.f3 6t,=:>dL ~ \"1 ct- ~cJc... &6~ SIC USE CATEGORY: t '"13 ~ ~~ c....~ ~"(2...~<---r-<..:>~ .L~~4~ Owner 'or uthorized Agent , ---------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY Date of City Council Meeting: Zone: LI Recommendation:(!) or N Approved: Y or N Date of P & Z Public Hearing: This application is: Approved ( ) Permit II Denied ( ) CLP JOB D (If Assigned Yet) Conditions: Zoning Administrator Date CED/1-'87 Pt) t3 I K 117 b : LOT.s '; ;Z t Pt. ~ 3 j L P 01 LOT ~ &\'\ N, p~ ~ t l(jl *' W, M' l~ 0') f\f.~N~r~,'11'1 ,;~+-~ -?~. "J.W '.-:87' Lo,s 11- ~.~ 4- A\\.ey (rJOTi, !.q"y dl'Sit1~ t; . , " KE_uut"'~1 tu tlt. ~ e . n III \ . :' ~ ------~~ \ ~--.-- . . ~ ' I I 'J, I :, I . I I i I I r ~i . : :" \, .~:: I " I ,.:\ ' : / / ,;' / \"" ,I' '" flJ 1) '~! "\ f ",. I I ~I , t\ fr ,- ,- ,,' e e Special conditio~aJ.lTse_ Permit Request.#SCT..196.-0Q2 Requested For: Lots 11-22; Block 687; Town of La Porte, which is further descnbed as being located in the 200 block of North 15th Street. Requested By: Lindsay pfeiffer Zoning: General Commercial (GC) Purpose of Request: Applicants are seeking a Special Conditional Use (SCU) Permit for the purpose of allowing construction of an off-site parking lot. This type of development is classified as a Conditional Use by Section 6- 400 of Zoning Ordinance 1501. Background: The purpose of this hearing is to consider Special Conditional Use Permit Request SCU96-002 which has been requested for lots 11- 22 and the adjacent alley of Block 687, Town of La Porte, which is further described as being located in the 100 Block of North 16th Street. The permit, which is being requested by pfeiffer and Son, Inc., the property owner, seeks approval to construct an "off-site" parking lot which is to serve the company's office and shop facility located at 116 North 16th Street. Off-site parking within General Commercial Zones is described as a Conditional Use by Section 6- 400 of Zoning Ordinance 1501. Analvsis: Zoning Ordinance Section 10-200 establishes the following review criteria and conditions for approval of Special Conditional Use Permits: · That the specific use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor significantly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity. · That the conditions placed on such use, as specified in each district, have been met by the applicant. Planning &; Zoning Commission Meeting of 4/11/96 SCU96-002 e e · That the applicant has agreed to meet any additional conditions imposed, based on specific site constraints necessary to protect the public interest and welfare of the community. Regarding the first of these conditions, compatibility with neighboring properties, staff would note that the tract in question is surrounded on all sides by General Commercial zoning. This property and the applicants' existing business are located in an area with very little off-street parking in the area. Additional off-street parking would improve this condition. Moreover, there is no reasonable location on the existing business site to provide additional parking. The second criteria to be considered is compliance with conditions and regulations of the zoning district in which the development is to be located As proposed, the parking lot complies with all applicable zoning regulations. Parking spaces and maneuvering aisles are of adequate dimension. The location of the handicap parking spaces should be appropriate when the proposed building is constructed Landscape area will exceed the City's 6% minimum requirement. The Landscaping plan will be submitted to the Director of Planning for final approval. This parking lot will serve an existing business that wishes to expand in the near future. It will benefit the area by moving cars off the street into proper and adequate parking areas. Staff recommends approval of the SCUP, subject to City Council approval of the street alley closing of Block 687. BLOCK lJ87, TOWN OF LA ORTE WEST ADAMS ( 800 RoOoWo ) 125 125 l!) I 32 l!) N N 2 31 3 30 - - ~ 4 29 a ~ $: 5 28 a a ~ 0> a a 6 27 0> ~ ., a 7 26 !Ot: <=0 0> .... ~ 8 25 0> ~ ~ 9 24 ~ 10 23 JC JC ~ F nJf) ~ JC -'. ~ :) 0> if') JC F :J 0> if)) WEST POLK ST (600 RoOoWo) .~~ ~84\\ 25 .:::t~\r.~:}<" .~ :...::-... ~ .....:.... : \. . SOUTH , liJ_ I IJ ., . .. C :II j.. m ~ r -~ ::C'tr20 I 9"; ~ i II "- 915 ~'f~17 ~ "~ \ - 4001399 39713981483 476 I 4"77 .--1'.................. J "'.' ~',' -'; ~:: .':: .......r;;..'... ....'-~ 375 24 ~ 23 22 ); 2 20 9 ST. ~. ~...." E"\ ; ~\ ~ b " :fJ - 4551454 456 35 3491350 352 8 7 C7 6 5 ,.: .. :I: .. ~ ,.: .. .I: .. - "~~-t'" . ;~\"'J:.. ;- !!t : . :.....' : : : :-.. ..... \ . ~. . I .... i"':: ~ ; TF<!.-':. " '. ) ()::::; ...f.........:- ~ : :"':'. : . ~::;..r.:~.~. .~c 9781977 .1 . . v i~:\~~::::;- ~ ;....l L):.:) 437 [ 434 436 It. 3281327 330 I 329 331 334 1 3331332 335 331 ST. ~ - SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE BLOCK 687 6261625 435 ~418 ~~ 08 105 106 107 -n 88 ~~ .82 :: 104 89 80 103 90 II. 79 IL 102 9 101 92 100 93 1ft 98 95 97 6501~ 6~~ \ 6531652 654 Q C i! -> c ., u ... 18 17 ~ ~ (,~ ~...~1 .,'l>~ ~_.""" ~" C!J\ C!J?.. 81 6Z 63 64 I'OllK 65 66 " 67 68 6' 14 685 \ hz 68 68ll~8-~ C!J'!J 7 \C!J1 ~ '-.?..06. '1. ?..O'!J , ~~' ?..O\ -; 'O~ \C!J~ ~ 60 59 58 57 "AIM 56 55 II. 54 ~3 52 50 7&9 68E - 1 68ci! 679 ~ 11: i .. ~ 67616771 -r- 716 717 690 IlLK 4 I 6931692 636 t 660 659 718 ld715 ~ A'l. . ('\l,\1O ?..\1 \C!J~ zoo 37 36 .~I ~ 35 34 40 .u.. 33 ST. 4 32 . 42 IL 31 II. 43 44 45 48 l .2 724 3' 7271172:1?~~. 71Z ~ 730 r29172~1 71 7091710 73 1,.?..1 ,'l-";)~ '!JC!J \1 '-.'l-~\ 'l-~O , 'l-El ?~ V(}... '0 1]...t:J' \~ 3 14 15 16 ST 30 29 28 'l-NJ ?...\ ~~~f5 ,'t.~ 'l-A ItI<<'I ?..";)\ 'z; :.~~.?.. IR. HtGtf " ~t;,. ;~".,..'''- . 12 l~' 109 II IT ,:.; .. Q .,., 10 II 9 II. 112;; o ., ,; 7 c .. 9'" x ... . 13 18 II. ,.; 1" x .. '" 4 19 II~;; 'f 6 20 16;; y 5 ~4 ),~1 153 I 752 x 75l - 23 2 '- 9 - 723 i 192 1M 793 79\ 795 I 794 190 160 789 7Q~ ~7 . 707 , ~8 -~'::,<;;. ~;~f~ ;;",\ .1 l ~ 1 ' .E:t;...' ~. .1iI.'0 . "~:"" ,-:." ...~;- ~ ~~:-:!;-' ~ . '4l 1 -'~~. ... :"tia. . ,.' ~,~-". I- 1ii (/) .... \ .s:: ~ \D ~ I- 0:: 0 Z ~t WEST MAIN ST. .~ '. """,~ " -""" , 'j. 'Ii i{ffiI~~;'l.. '. ;:: '!~ .,t' t.,(..:r. '* .~.~ -~ 4:..-': ~;4.t"l>i; -~~:~~' .:~' ..J...l"r. . , N.T.S. '-,. <,It J"".'\i ."............ '.. '~1. .r 4k't. , ", . '''':'-';'J;''b ,""" ~_>r, ;.JF;~' ~...:;w<:.} ':.' , , ,J ,"~ ',..... r~"".'j ;.i.:_~< ......r_~:.... ;"''''.''..~.. :~'." ' _.' J',l: .:;.:, "(" ',~,~'" ;'o,,~.&- ~""lb.. --.. ~ ~ ~~ N 5, ( N ~ H U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~' - 3 -~ I~ ,3' ~' = ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,3' - -~ - I T~m~,",,==mnm. ~ 0 ~ I e e , l i I i ~ ~ I ; ~ ,3' ~ - "- 2: WEST~~~-;-~HJ ..---..." ,!>,. ::.'!bt>,OO' ~ 1ft ~ I'" ~ ""-' """" ""-' =><> ""-' ""-" I wu ~ ~ i ""-' e ~ ~ i- i 8 ~ 5 ~ m ~ ""-' ~ .:: ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ""-'" ~ -;:;;:;;: S ""-' ~ """" ~ ""-" f ""-" ""-" \ :;:;; ""-" ""'" ""-" ""-'" "'" ~ 'II' ~ __.. .-.e::;" ....,boo WEST POLK STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ ,3' I ,..c==-~ I I I I I I I I N T R 5 u IRi v ,3' ~ ~ E Y ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii s ~ ~- , l i ~ ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ --. ~' A 3 5 ~' ~ ,3' ,3' ~ ~ ~ ,3' ,3' ~ ~ ,3' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ., lei nit" III . D NO SCOl.< KEY loW' NO L.EGEND - """NO -- -.-..- """"" -.' -,=, ~~ .....;.... =~....,:;;.. . ........ 0 f ....T!!Vl>i.ve J/ =~ f c,t,'fl::,joj~" ;~ " " ~ -.....- -.o.l1l _.. ~~~~ ~TJ:~~:=-::-" I'\.llCIiAllm LNJ5EY R PFEITEII ~ It> ~Li'- ".... <CN .,...- 02-1.-9(1 ~ 1~""50' ~{~. '2tOOOJ~~C ~ SUI-O'.... ~ C1 ~ill :s~~~ ~5~~ F'~~'" ~~,,~ ;g~! ~~~I ~~:i 2~~ i5g:! , ~~I~~~ ~~~~;~ ~~Jgl """", ~1i_..~~_I_ e.l..-~iclIngw. (.....I..,.._"lcol.of__.....1 N *~ W E / , s N .*~ " . EJ] e e A l\tIEETING OF THE LA PORTE Plannin~ and Zonin~ Commission (Type of Meeting) April 11. 1996 (Meeting Date) ~4fg~~E~ PLANNING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-OO2 (Type of Request) I HA VE RE7CEIYED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND I AM IN FAVOR OF OR I AM IN OPPOSITION OF GRANTING THIS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: ~ ~V ~ (\ \2-.l)~ ,.-- Lt? f ~~ il'-- NMIE (pLEASE P T) &02- s" t0~~J- HOME ADDRE L~ Q~IL~2-, ~ / . e A MEETING OF THE LA PORTE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR ~fJt PLANNING. Planning and Zonin~ Commission (Type of Meeting) April 11. 1996 (Meeting Date) Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU96-OO2 (Type of Request) I HA VE RECEIVED NOTICE OF THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUBLIC HEARING AND IN FAVOR OF OR I AM X lAM IN oPPOSmON OF GRANTING TillS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: To the best of my knowledge my land is in a flood zone. The drainage from this paved parking lot may make my land a swamp. without proper grading of land in the Droposed site and adjacent abutting lands, no permit should be granted. Secondly the permit requester should provide man made drainage from his lane to the nearest , bayou as a second condition. if 1!5~1!f~~c~ l( (;, j( lJ / TIl j~CI ^ /1 IV) , NAME (pLEASE PRINT) /1 Gi1vr;N elk HOME ADDRESS 1+ Alj)CJ V c i< I rn A CJ I ?; I d e e ~ST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA I~ AGENDA DATE 04/22/96 REQUESTED BY Robert Herrera. Citv Manaaer ~ REPORT; RESOLUTION; ORDINANCE; Attachments: In an effort to improve the level of service in our EMS operation, we are requesting the addition of three new EMS personnel. 'Currently, we have two fully staffed ambulances available at all times. The times in which both ambulances are in service grows each year. I challenged staff to find a method to improve our service coverage without having to absorb the full financial impact of adding a third shift, which involves the addition of a new ambulance and six full time employees. Staff reviewed the situation and presented a viable solution to this concern and I am at this time proposing it to the Council. The proposal is to hire three new paramedics. These paramedics will be entry level staff and will ride the ambulances. By placing these three employees on the vehicle, it will free up our three most senior shift personnel to act as shift coordinators. The shift coordinator will work out of the EMS Suburban vehicle (the EMS Chief currently drives this vehicle but he will began to drive the EMS car, which is a full emergency vehicle). Three primary advantages of this set up are: a. The Shift Supervisor, operating from the suburban. can go to the majority of calls, thereby providing a third set of experienced hands to control the emergency situation more efficiently. b. The suburban is equipped with all the equipment necessary to start and continue advanced trauma and cardiac life support. c. In those instances when both ambulances are on a call and a mutual aid is placed for a third call that comes in, the Shift Supervisor would normally be available to take control of the scene and assure the patient receives the appropriate level of care. We are requesting we add these individuals at this time. The estimated financial impact of the addition of these three personnel is $32,000 for the remainder of the current fiscal year. Funding will come from the budgeted contingency account in the General Fund. This request has been reviewed with the Audit Committee and received their full support. ACTION REQUIRED BY COUNCIL: Approve or deny the addition of three personnel to the EMS Division at a cost of $32,000 for the remainder of the 1995-96 fiscal year with funding to be taken from the Budgeted Contingency Account in the General Fund. FUND General Fund ACCT NUM: 001-601-607-900 FUNDS AVAILABLE: ~ APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Q~~ T. ~ ROBERT T HERRERA, CITY MANAGER 4 - \ q - qL, DATE e e e:aUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .. Agenda Date Requested: Aoril 22. 1996 Requested By: Alex Osmond. Golf Pro/Manaaer Department: Administration XX Report Resolution Ordinance Exhibits: 1) Sealed Bid #0674 2) Bid Tabulation 3) Bidders List SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION Sealed bids #0674 for chemicals and fertilizers to be used at the City of La Porte's Golf Course and Parks Maintenance Department were opened and read on March 25, 1996. Bid request were mailed to nine (9) vendors with five (5) returning bids. Bids will be awarded in each section to the vendor meeting all required specifications. SECTION VENDOR TOTAL 1. Insecticides Gold Kist $ 5,165.24 2. Herbicides Terra International $ 9,582.88 3. Fungicides Terra International $ 8,187.76 4. Greens Grade Fertilizer Terra International $ 4,442.80 5. Fairway Fertilizer Gold Kist $ 24,270.80 6. Other Products Terra International $ 14,377.40 6. TOTAL $ 66,026.88 This is a six percent (6%) decrease from last contract's price. Sufficient funds are available in the Golf Course Maintenance and Parks Maintenance budgets. Golf Course Maintenance will provide 75% of the funding and Parks Maintenance will provide 25%. Total $ 52,500.00 $ 22.000.00 $ 74,500.00 Golf Course budget for chemicals and fertilizers Parks Maintenance budget Action Required by Council: Award bids as per above recommendation: Availability of Funds: XX General Fund Capital Improvement XX Other (None Required) Water/Wastewater General Revenue Sharing Account Number: Various Funds Available: -1QL Yes No Aooroved for Citv Council Agenda Alpui )7, /176 '/Date / e e CITY OF LA PORTE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM APRIL 1, 1996 FROM: DENNIS HLAVATY, GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT SUSAN KELLEy,~URCHASING AGENT TO: SUBJ: SEALED BID #0674 - CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS Advertised, sealed bids #0674 - chemicals and fertilizers were opened and read on March 25, 1996. Bid requests were mailed to nine (9) vendors with five (5) returning bids. Low bid meeting specifications and bidding all items in a section, are as follows: GOLD KIST: Section I Section V - Insecticides - Fairway Fertilizer TOTAL $ 5,165.24 $24.270.80 $29,436.04 TERRA INTERNATIONAL: TOTAL $ 9,582.88 $ 8,187.76 $ 4,442.80 $14.377.40 $36,590.84 Section II Section III Section IV Section VI - Herbicides Fungicides Greens Grade Fertilizer Other Products Using estimated yearly quantities, the total cost would be $66,026.88. This is a six percent (6%) decrease from last contract's price. Please submit your recommendation with an agenda request form by the prescribed time before the next regular council meeting. If there is a need to delay bringing this bid before council, please notify me. Attachment: Bid Tabulation Bidder's List e e BID TABULATION - CHEMICAL & FERTILIZER SECTION I - INSECTICIDES 1) OFTANOL 5% GRANULAR (40 LB. BAGS) 2) ORTHO ORTHENE W.P.S. (LBS) 3) TRIUMPH 4E (GALS) 4) DURSBAN 4E (GALS) 5) DYLOX (LBS) 6) AWARD FIRE ANT KILLER (LBS) 7) PINPOINT (25 LB. BAGS) 10 12 4 10 50 250 10 SECTION II - HERBICIDES '1) BUENO SIX M.S.M.A. (GALS) 2) P.B.1. GORDON TRIMEC CLASSIC (GALS) 3) ROUND-UP (GALS) 4) PRESAN 12.5 G (BAGS) 5) KERB 50-W (LBS) 6) COPPER SULFATE (50 LB. BAGS) 7) SUFLAN (GALS) 8) ILLOXAN (GALS) 9) BARRICADE 65 WG (LBS) 10) BUCTRIL (GALS) 11) REWARD (GALS) 12) MANAGE (1.3 OZ CONT) 13) BASAGRAN (GALS) 30 15 50 10 42 10 10 4 20 10 8 20 4 SECTION III - FUNGICIDES 1) FORE FLOWABLE (GALS) 2) CHIPCO 26019 FLOWABLE (GALS) 3) BANOL (GALS) 4) DACONIL WEATHER STICK (GALS) 5) BANNER TURF FUNGICIDE (GALS) 6) CONSAN 20 (GALS) 7) SUBDUE (GALS) 8) PROTECT W.S.P. (LBS) 32 10 8 10 10 12 4 200 SECTION IV - GREENS GRADE FERTILIZER 1) COUNTRY CLUB 18-3-12 (50 LB. BAGS) 2) PRO GREEN 19-0-18 (50 LB. BAGS) 3) BEST 16-4-8 W/2% IRON, (50 LB BAGS) 4) MILORGANITE 6-2-0 (50 LB. BAGS) 5) PAR EX 10-18-22 (50 LB. BAGS) 6) N-SURE 28-0-0 SLOW RELEASE (GALS) 80 80 80 200 20 20 $66.40 $10.17 $163.55 $73.15 $6.60 $5.54 127.85 ..$5,1$$.~4.... $17.25 $22.60 $49.64 $74.65 $21.35 NO BID NO BID $94.25 $41.00 NO BID $84.95 $82.00 $71 .15 $8;;7JJ?~O $24.90 $88.95 $252.65 $52.40 $232.50 NO BID $195.75 NOBID $1';~~.50 $17.38 $17.75 $8.24 $6.00 NO BID NO BID $4;aa~t6P/ $47.40 $11.25 $180.00 $94.00 $8.80 $5.45 161.75 $5,689:00 . $17.05 $17.56 $50.60 $83.50 $8.64 $32.50 $79.00 $96.00 $38.50 $59.00 $89.00 $84.50 $76.00 ... $1 0 '067. 78. ... -... ",...... ;;~::::,.:.::.,'::.-.}:-:-.::-:-:.',::~i:,.::,:,:,:::: $23.65 $97.00 $249.00 $61 .40 $240.00 $42.50 $207.00 $4.40 ......$8,95().80... $17.50 $23.50 $8.89 $5.50 $18.00 $6.50 $&,581.~p $60.16 $18.72 $165.33 $81.65 $7.13 $5.85 $152.75 $5,~$O.56) .. $14.88 $20.20 $46.48 NO BID $23.61 $36.00 $69.72 $95.26 $39.50 $55.00 $23.45 $78.82 $78.10 )$.... 8;919.66/. ........-..............-. . $25.88 $112.70 $266.67 $64.00 $241.75 $20.36 $214.10 NOBID ......$8;,?4$.z4... $16.62 $17.03 $8.60 $6.55 NO BID NO BID $4;$~()iPO > $66.11 $9.60 $159.70 $78.50 $6.60 $5.50 $260.50 ..$6,Sl().10 $17.74 $22.10 $44.16 $79.00 $19.84 $28.50 $66.05 $89.48 $38.00 $52.66 $77.36 $70.53 $67.10 <$9,s82.88> . $24.85 $88.28 $238.25 $32.00 $234.74 $31.53 $195.00 3.89 ..........$8,187'.76 ..... ",.. '" ,..... $14.59 $15.39 $7.00 $5.37 $14.38 $6.14 $4,.442.80> .. $70.00 $11.25 $160.00 $76.00 $7.00 $5.53 $175.00 $5,717.50 $15.75 $21.00 $46.00 NO BID $25.00 NO BID $85.00 $98.00 $41.00 $58.00 $84.00 NO BID $71.00 >$7,735.50 $33.75 $91.50 $246.00 $38.00 $238.00 $36.00 $219.00 $4.25 ./$8,881.00 NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID $6.50 <i$1ap.QO..' e e BID TABULATION - CHEMICAL & FERTILIZER (Continued) SECTION V - FAIRWAY FERTILIZER 1) BONUS CROP 16-4-10 (TONS) 2) BONUS CROP 12-24-12 (TONS) 3) PAR EX 8-0-15 W/3% BARRICADE (TONS) 4) PAR EX 16-0-15 W/3% BARRICADE (TONS 4) AMERICAN PLANT FOOD 20-5-10 (TONS) $160.20 $215.90 $770.45 $799.00 $254.00 $g4,27'Q.llQ SECTION VI - OTHER PRODUCTS 1) ALLIANCE ROOT ENHAf\.\CER (GALS) 2) RUFFIN (GALS) 3) NEUTRA CLEAN TANK CLEANER (GALS) 4) BIG FOOT SPRAY INDICATOR (GALS) 5) ACTIVATE PLUS SPREADER(GALS) 6) AQUA SHADE LAKE DYE (GALS) 7) PRIMO W.S.P. (CONTAINERS) 8) GREENS CHOICE SPECL TOP DRESSING A. BULK -12 TON MIN DELIVERY (TONS) B. 40 LB BAGS - 50 BAGS PER TON (TONS) .SI;QmIQN'.l!,..QmAV(J~$lt~fn#llA>~$)< $214.12 $216.00 $265.78 $294.00 $711.20 $1,264.00 $753.20 NO BID $427.60 $350.00 > $aS,584.ijll < $22,$$?;QO $196.80 $260.00 $1,047.31 $726.88 $406.40 .....$2a!,aa2~gS NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID . Noan)< 20 20 10 20 10 100 40 NO BID $25.41 NO BID $26.64 $35.00 NO BID $7.78 NO BID $5.53 $6.00 $7.05 $3.52 $56.18 $6.50 $6.00 $23.15 $23.20 $18.82 $18.00 $23.00 NO BID $15.95 $21.67 $5.90 $6.95 $33.95 $29.25 $34.36 $28.80 $32.00 83.75 $83.75 NO BID $83.75 $86.25 NO BID NO BID '::$7.27...8':'5"0.' . ..- , ., - - .. .... >:::.. ::::>i.. '::.:<..:..i.."':.::.:::) $Z;g7'8.$Q . NO BID NO BID NO BID $528.00 ~U~}$t~$$7~:$Qr~] :$4~:$$Q~~QQH $?\$$7';SO$'!Mt$$i$Q> $200.00 $370.00 .......$.............. ..... .". .. ,. <<Z;~7:;4P . ....$........................ ... ... .. .. . .. > J4,377\4P NO BID NO BID <$a!.Q$9.$Q.... ......$a!,()$9.50... . e BIDDER'S LIST SEALED BID #0674 - CHEMICALS & FERTILIZERS ARROW-MAGNOLIA 2646 RODNEY LANE DALLAS, TX 75229 BWI - SCHULENBURG, INC. P.O. BOX 459 SCHULENBURG, TX 78956 GOLD KIST INC. 13622 EAST HARDY RD. HOUSTON, TX 77039 NITRO PHOS FERTILIZERS 704 COLLINS HOUSTON, TX 77023 SOUTHWEST FERTILIZERS 5828 BISSONNETT HOUSTON, TX 77081 TERRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. 16802 BARKER SPRINGS RD, SUITE 900 HOUSTON, TX 77084 TURF INDUSTRIES 5097 ASHLEY COURT HOUSTON, TX 77041 VAN WATERS & ROGERS P.O. BOX 4579 HOUSTON, TX 77210 WILBUR-ELLIS P.O. BOX 454 EAGLE LAKE, TX 77434 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P.O. BOX 996 LA PORTE, TX 77572-0996 BAYSHORE SUN PUBLISH DATES: MARCH 10, 1996 MARCH 17, 1996