HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-08 Regular Meeting, Public Hearing and Special Called Workshop Minutes of City Council
e
e
e
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING,
PUBlLIC HEARING AND SPECIAL CALLED WORKSHOP
OF LA PORTE CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 08,1999
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Norman Malone at 6:00 p.m.
Members of City Council Present: Councilpersons Guy Sutherland, Chuck Engelken,
Howard Ebow, Peter Griffiths, Alton Porter, Charlie Young, Jerry Clarke and Mayor
Norman Malone. Councilperson Deotis Gay arrived at 6: 17 PM.
Members of Council Absent: None.
Members of City Executive Staff and City Employees Present: City Manager Robert T.
Herrera, Assistant City Manager John Joerns, Assistant City Manager Jeff Litchfield,
City Attorney Knox Askins, City Secretary Martha Gillett, Director of Administrative
Services Louis Rigby, Assistant Public Works Director Buddy Jacobs, Purchasing
Manager Susan Kelley, Parks and Recreation Director Stephen Barr, Police Chief
Bobby Powell, Assistant Finance Director Cynthia Alexander, Golf Pro Alex Osmond,
Golf Course Superintendent Dennis Hlavaty.
Others Present: Bill White, Buford Leonard, Larry Tracka, Colleen Hicks, Becky
Fuller, Andrew Zuckero and Dwight Zuckero from Troop 915, and Stephen Boysen,
Bruno Garcia, Michael Mosley, Freddie Palomarez, Anthony Alvarado, Natalie Mills,
Vikki Hutto, Claire Kondas from the American Legion Boys and Girls State.
2. Councilperson Jerry Clarke delivered the Invocation.
3. Council considered approving the minutes of the Special Called Workshop Meeting on
February 1, 1999.
Motion was made bv Counciloerson Engelken to aoorove the minutes of the Soecial
Called Workshop Meeting on Februarv 1. 1999 as presented. Second by Councilperson
Ebow. The motion carried.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None.
Arrived after vote: Gay
4. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES, COMMUNICATIONS, AND CITIZENS AND
TAX PAYERS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL
The following citizens addressed Council:
Joy Mills, 8711 Ashwyne, La Porte, Texas, addressed City Council regarding the
Bulldogs "Walk Of Pride" for Project Graduation.
-
e
City Council Minutes 2-08-99 - Page 2
5. Bill White presented the 1998 American Legion Post 428 La Porte High School
Representatives for the Boys' State and Girls' State. The following young men and
women were in attendance at the Council Meeting: Stephen Boysen, Bronco Garcia,
Michael Mosley, Freddie Palomarez, Anthony Alvarado, Natalie Mills, Vikki Hutto,
and Claire Kondas.
6. Open Public Hearing - Mayor Malone opened the public hearing at 6:17 P.M.
Review By Staff - Assistant City Manager Jeff Litchfield and Director of
Administrative Services Louis Rigby presented for review and discussion the adoption
of a 20-year retirement provision with Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Public Input -None.
Recommendation of Staff - Staff recommends City Council consider approving the
adoption of a 20-year retirement with Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Close Public Hearing - Mayor Malone closed the Public Hearing at 6:27 P.M.
7. Council considered approving Ordinance 99-2309 for the adoption of a 20-year
retirement through Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Assistant City Manager Jeff Litchfield and Director of Administrative Services Louis
Rigby presented summary and answered City Council questions.
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-2309 - CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER
ACTION REGARDING ON ORDINANCE AFFECTING PARTICIPATION OF
CITY EMPLOYEES IN THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
GRANTING THE ADDITIONAL RIGHTS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION
854.202(G) OF TITLE 8, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE AS AMENDED.
Motion was made bv Councilperson Gav to approve the Ordinance as presented bv Mr.
Litchfield and Mr. Rigbv. Second by Councilperson Engelken. The motion carried
unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
8. Council considered approving a resolution to endorse guiding principles for cleaner air
for the Houston-Galveston region.
City Manager Robert T. Herrera presented summary and recommendations.
City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 99-19 - A RESOLUTION ENDORSING
GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CLEANER AIR FOR THE HOUSTON-GAL VESTION
REGION
-
e
City Council Meeting Minutes 2-08-99 - Page 3
Motion was made by Councilperson Engelken to approve the Resolution as presented
by Mr. Herrera. Second by Councilperson Griffiths. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
9. Council considered approving a resolution for the conservation of the State's soil, water
and related resources.
City Manager Robert T. Herrera presented summary.
City Attorney read: RESOLUTION 99-20 - A RESOLUTION FOR THE
CONSERVATION OF THE STATE'S SOIL, WATER AND RELATED
RESOURCES.
Motion was made by Councilperson Engelken to approve the Resolution as presented
by Mr. Herrera. Second by Councilperson Sutherland. The motion carried
unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
10. Council considered the approval of an Ordinance calling the regular annual and run-off
election for the City of La Porte.
City Attorney Knox Askins presented summary and recommendation.
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-2310 - CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER
ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE CALLING THE REGULAR ANNUAL
AND RUN-OFF ELECTION FOR THE CITY OF LA PORTE.
Motion was made by Councilperson Engelken to approve the ordinance as presented by
Mr. Askins. Second by Councilperson Ebow. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
11. Council considered the approval of an Ordinance approving and authorizing an
agreement between the City of La Porte and Harris County to construct drainage
improvements to Sunrise Drive.
e
e
City Council Meeting Minutes 2-08-99 - Page 4
City Manager Robert T. Herrera presented summary and recommendation.
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-2311- CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER
ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND HARRIS COUNTY TO
CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SUNRISE DRIVE.
Motion was made bv Councilperson Clarke to approve the ordinance as presented bv
Mr. Herrera. Second by Councilperson Young. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke, and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
12. Council considered the approval of an Ordinance approving an agreement between the
City of La Porte and Hall/Barnum Architects, Inc. for architectural services for the new
city library.
Bill Hall, Dan Barnum, and Steve Lucase were present representing Hall/Barnum
Architects, Inc.
City Manager Robert T. Herrera presented summary and recommendation and
answered City Council questions.
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-2312 - CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER
ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA PORTE AND HALL/BARNUM ARCHITECTS, INC.
FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE NEW CITY LmRARY.
Motion was made bv Council person Ebow to approve the ordinance as presented bv
Mr. Herrera. Second by Council person Griffiths. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
13. Council considered the approval of an Ordinance on Taxi Dancing.
City Manager Robert T. Herrera presented summary.
Mayor Malone stepped out at 6:50 PM. Mayor Pro-Tern Alton Porter took the vote.
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-2313 - CONSIDER APPRO V AL OR OTHER
ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE ON TAXI DANCING.
e
.
City Council Meeting Minutes 2-08-99 - Page 5
Motion was made by Councilperson Griffiths to approve the ordinance as presented by
Mr. Herrera. Second by Councilperson Ebow. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, and Clarke.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Absent for vote: Malone
14. Council considered the approval of an Ordinance granting a pipeline permit to Seadrift
Pipeline Corporation.
Assistant Public Works Director Buddy Jacobs presented summary and
recommendations
City Attorney read: ORDINANCE 99-915-RR - CONSIDER APPROVAL OR
OTHER ACTION REGARDING AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A PIPELINE
PERMIT TO SEADRIFf PIPELINE CORPORATION.
Motion was made by Council person Engelken to approve the ordinance as presented by
Mr. Jacobs. Second by Councilperson Gay. The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, and Clarke.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Absent for vote: Malone
Mayor Malone returned to the meeting at 6:55 PM.
15. Council considered approval to instruct the City Manager to increase funding for the
girls softball project.
Director of Parks & Recreation Steven Barr presented summary.
City Attorney read: CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION INSTRUCTING
THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE FUNDING FOR THE GIRLS SOFfBALL
PROJECT.
Motion was made by Council person Ebow to approve the increase in funding for the
girls softball proiect as presented by Mr. Barr. Second by Councilperson Engelken.
The motion carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
16. Council considered the approval authorizing the purchase of radios from HGAC.
-
e
City Council Meeting Minutes 2-08-99- Page 6
Susan Kelley presented summary and recommendation and answered City Council
questions.
City Attorney read: CONSIDER APPROVAL OR OTHER ACTION AUTHORIZING
THE PURCHASE OF RADIOS FROM HGAC.
Motion was made by Council person Clarke to approve the purchase of radios from
HGAC as presented by Ms. Kelley. Second by Councilperson Engelken. The motion
carried unanimously.
Ayes: Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Griffiths, Porter, Gay, Young, Clarke, and Mayor
Malone.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
Mayor Malone stopped the meeting for a break at 6:58 PM.
17. Special Called Workshop discussed the golf course greens.
The workshop was opened at 7: 10 PM.
Golf Pro Alex Osmond gave comments and answered questions. Bret Ratcliffe from
Turf Industries was present to answer questions.
The workshop was closed and the Regular Meeting was re-convened at 7:57 PM.
18. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
City Manager Robert T. Herrera reminded Council of the following events:
A. Cancellation of March 8 and March 22, 1999 Council meetings. There will be
a Special Called Regular Meeting on March 15, 1999.
B. Risk Management Planning Dinner - February 23, 1999 at Sylvan Beach
Pavilion.
C. Open House for Mike Jackson and John Davis - February 25,1999 at the
Sylvan Beach Pavilion.
D. National League of Cities Conference - March 5 - 9, 1999 in Washington D.C.
E. Margaret Lindsey v. The City of La Porte, Texas, Norman Malone, John
Joerns, Guy Rankin, Bobby Powell, Robert Herrera, and John Armstrong. We
received a letter from Ramon Viada of Abrams, Scott, & Bickley, L.L.P.
notifying us that the Court has granted a take nothing summary judgement in
favor of all of the Defendants in this case. This means that the city and the
individual city officials have won the case at the trial court level.
e
e
City Council Meeting Minutes 2-08-99- Page 7
19. COUNCIL ACTION
Councilpersons Sutherland, Engelken, Ebow, Porter, Griffiths, Gay, Young and Mayor
Malone brought items to Council's attention.
20. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PURSUANT TO PROVISION OF THE OPEN
MEETINGS LAW, CHAPTER 551.071 THROUGH 551.076, AND 551.084,
TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, - (CONSULTATION WITH
ATTORNEY, DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL PROPERTY,
DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT OR DONATION,
PERSONNEL MATTERS, CONFERENCE WITH EMPLOYEES
DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES, OR EXCLUDING A
WITNESS DURING EXAMINATION OF ANOTHER WITNESS IN AN
INVESTIGATION)
A. 551.072 (REAL PROPERTY) MEET WITH CITY ATTORNEY
TO DISCUSS LAND ACQUISITION.
Council retired into Executive Session at 8: 10 P.M. under Section 551.072 (Real
Property) Meet with City Attorney to discuss land acquisition.
Council adjourned Executive Session at 8:24 PM.
Council returned to the table at 8:27 P.M., with no action taken.
21. CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ITEMS CONSIDERED
IN EXECUTIVE SESSION
No action taken.
22. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before Council, the Regular Meeting was duly
adjourned at 8:28 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ () .)4P1te)
Martha A. Gillett
City Secretary
Passed and approved on this 28th day of February, 1999.
Norman L. Malone, Mayor
_ e
IQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGEND_TEM
AGENDA DATE Februarv 8.1999 REQUESTED BY Louis Riabv. Director of Adm. Services
Jeff Litchfield. Assistant City Manaaer
_ REPORT; _ RESOLUTION; ~ ORDINANCE; ~ Public Hearing
In 1995, the State Legislature changed provisions to the Texas Municipal Retirement System
which allows member cities to adopt a 20 year retirement provision. Prior to that time, an
employee under the age of 60 had to have 25 years of participating service to retire with full
benefits (there is a retirement option for 10 years of service and age 60). Since 1995, 156 cities
have adopted the 20 year retirement provision. This means that 41.8% of all TMRS contributing
members have the 20 year option.
An employee retiring under the 20 year provision receives a much smaller annuity than they
would if they waited until they had 25 years of service. This is caused by less funds being set
aside for their retirement and less funds being matched by the City. It has been estimated that
an employee retiring at 20 years of service would have an annuity that is 40% less than if they
had waited until they had reached 25 years to retire. Even though retirement at 20 years is less
financially attractive than at 25 years, we feel it important to consider the option so employees
can have the right to choose.
To further complicate our understanding of this option, while the adoption of the 20 year option
does not substantially [ncrease the cost of the plan, it does increase the contribution rate
required to fund the benefits. The actuary currently calculates a city's cost to fund its plan
assuming an employee retires at either 25 years of service or age 60 with at least 10 years of
service, whichever is earlier. Adopting this provisions means the plan must now be funded when
an employee has only 20 years of service. As a result, the City has to "catch up" its funding.
This has a financial impact on our funding into the system. For example, an employee has 9
years of service with the City. Under the current provision, the City has 16 years remaining
before retirement in which to fund the current service portion (city matching) of this employee's
benefit. The System's actuary calculates the rate required of the City to achieve this end. But
the City now adopts the 20-year provision. The City now only has 11 years in which to meet this
end; therefore, the City must speed up (increase) its contributions to reach the end result.
Although the City is stH! only matching the deposits made by the employee, the actuary can now
count on 5 fewer years of actuarial circumstances (turnover, payroll growth, etc.) off-setting some
of the required matchir.g funds.
A good comparison of this phenomenon is to compare it to refinancing a house note. You
originally had 25 years to pay for the house. By refinancing, you increase the amount you pay
each year but lowered ~he number of years you pay. You actually save money when you
compare the two options. That is how it is with the comparison between the 25 year and 20 year
options. You will pay more in the first couple of years but costs will decline after that.
If the City adopts the 20 year option, it will not have any financial impact on any employees who
do not exercise the option prior to 25 years of service. If an employee exercises the option
before they have 25 years of service, they have a lower annuity and it theoretically saves the City
money. This is true because you normally replace the retiring employee with someone who has
a lower salary than the retiring employee.
Providing a 20 year retirement option has additional benefits. For example, if an employee
currently has 21 years of services and dies, their spouse would not be eligible for retirement
benefits until the time when the employee would have reached age 60. Under the 20 year
option, the spouse would be able to receive monthly annuities immediately. This would probably
.
e
be a tremendous benefit to the spouse, especially if school age children were involved. I know I
certainly would be more comfortable knowing my wife would be better able to put the kids
through college.
In summary, if the City of La Porte adopts the 20 year retirement option, the costs to the City
would increase in the first couple of years and then decrease in later years. The cost increase
for the first couple of years would be about $58,500 per year (the impact on Fiscal Year 1998-99
would be about $34,125). After that time, a new actuarial would be prepared and it is expected
the costs for the 20 year option will be lower.
A summary of years of service for current employees with more than 15 years of service with the
City of La Porte is:
Years of Service
Number of Employees
11 to 15
16 to 20
21 to 25
More than 25
58
46
16
7
As you can see, there are currently 7 employees with 25 or more years of service who are
eligible for retirement at this time. If the attached ordinance is approved, there would be an
additional 16 employees who would be eligible at this time. For the employees in the 11 to 20
year range, which represents about 1/3 of our work force, we believe this benefit would help us to
retain these career minded individuals. If any of them were to consider leaving the City for a job
on the outside, by making them that much closer to retirement, it might sway them to stay with us
longer.
In addition to these numbers, there are employees with eligible service at other Cities. Because
of the complexity of the various options, these have to be reviewed on a case by case basis to
determine the impact. Finally, for those employees who have prior service credit that has been
moved to the City of Le Porte, that prior service credit counts as La Porte time.
In conclusion, staff recommends City Council adopt the 20 year retirement provision offered by
the Texas Municipal Retirement System. The adoption of the 20 year option will increase
expenses for the first couple of years and then should reduce them in later years. While
impossible to prove or disprove, logically, the adoption of the 20 year option saves the City
money over the long term. The adoption of the 20 year option will not force anyone to retire but
rather give the employee the opportunity to retire earlier, if they so desire.
ACTION REQUIRED BY COUNCIL:
Approve or deny the adoption of an Ordinance authorizing the 20 year Retirement Option offered
by the Texas Municipa' Retirement System.
FUND Operatino
ACCT NUM: Various
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Yes
APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
G<~ T. ~
ROBERT T. HERRERA, CITY MANAGER
~. L\ - q Cf
DATE
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 2309
AN ORDINANCE AFFECTING PARTICIPATION OF CITY EMPLOYEES IN THE TEXAS
MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM GRANTING THE ADDITIONAL RIGHTS AUTHORIZED
BY SECTION 854.202(g) OF TITLE 8, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, AS AMENDED,
FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW, AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 854.202(g) of Subtitle G of Title 8, Texas
Government Code, as amended, which Subtitle shall herein be referred to as the ''TMRS Act",
the City of La Porte, Texas, adopts the following provisions affecting participation of its
employees in the Texas Municipal Retirement system (herein referred to as the "System'?:
(a) Any employee of the City who is a member of the System is eligible to retire and
receive a service annuity if the member has at least 20 years of credited service in
the System perfonned for one or more municipalities that have adopted a like
provision under Section 854.202(g) of the TMRS Act.
(b) Prior to adopting this ordinance, the governing body of the City has: (1) prepared
an actuarial analysis of member retirement annuities at 20 years of service; and (2
held a public hearing pursuant to the notice provisions of the Texas Open Meetings
Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
(c) The rights herein above authorized shall be in addition to the plan provisions
heretofore adopted and in force at the effective date of this ordinance pursuant to the
TMRS Act.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective on the first day of March, 1999.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this the 8th day of February, 1999.
CITY OF LA PORTE
BY4z~
ATTEST:
Cities that have adopted the 20 year Retirement Option
EMP Current 20- Year Number
City Deposit Rate Match Any Age Contributing Population
Ratio Effective Memben 15,oM
An2elton .05 2-1 12-95 80
Brvan .06 2-1 1-98 739 55.000
Clute .07 2-1 3-96 77 9.130
Colle2e Station .06 2-1 11-96 621 52,226
Freeoort .05 2-1 3-96 84 12,310
Friendswood .07 2-1 1-99 131 24.500
Humble .05 2-1 3-96 158 14.634
Huntsville .07 1 1/2-1 1-96 256 30.152
La Maraue .05 2-1 1-97 102 15,600
Missouri City .07 2-1 1-98 166 35,196
Pearland .07 2-1 12-95 180 20,000
Seabrook .05 2-1 1-97 65 7.800
South Houston .05 1 1/2-1 11-96 97 14_1!
Stafford .06 2-1 10-96 85 7,0
Texas City .07 2-1 1-98 413 42.812
Webster .07 2-1 11-95 103 5,315
As of January 28,1999
> 156 Cities have adopted the above provisions into their employee retirement package.
>This represents 41% of the Cities who participates.
J~.2B.l9'99 4:44PM .
e
1'l0.893
CITIES THAT HAVE ADOPTED THE ''20-YEAR ANY AGE" RETIREMENT EUGIBIUTY
AS OF JANUARY 28, 1999.
,
, EMP. CURRo 12D-YEAR I NUMBER I
.. -.--..-..--.---- ... .. '''r . -- -~---.-
-. . :... CITY . .:_~.D,:'~IT ~~~~.I~~:-I ~=~-~ POP.
-------..----.-....--..-. ~ .... ----,--.-- ----.--...
~o)~eig,hts._.__.__ '.'~_ ~.:L.~..9 I 85 ~~~
~~_ _ ._..... In_~P~ 2-1 I 1-99 _L. 210 I ~~9
~P"ir!L__ _.________ . ..:~.. .. 1:1 ~._M6_L. 57 8,030
~112...-_.__ ._. _ I ._~OL 2-1 I 1.aL..L _ ..1.360. '~.,rr2
. ~::PW.-----. ' '~~"'I. ~:~ ~ t~~:-+- - :~ 1~::
~~~~:~~.:.. .---...- _..._.lr":""1CT ~-t ~~~:T':-"~~ 1~j~
AzI.' _.. _u. ._._.. .__.. .. .. ..05 I 2-:1. .._ _',!l-96 j_ ._ 87 . _.9,!OOO
B~J~~rt~.._ ..._., i __.9..5_._..1:L_.L.1-.9_B... 12~ 18.z.Q.OO
Banga. .. _ .. . _. .._....L.. .07 $ 2='..._L 6-91--_. ...~_ _. h?:16
B8~. .. . _....L_.~_ -1-~. 1_12.95 . -11 1.657
.Bellyllle_ u_n__' .._.._.....__ .. I .05. 2-1 9.95 _.~_n._. 51 _3,~1
Et8!'.!?~~ . _ ...-l'-....:.O!.. ~~1. I 1.0-:~...;. _~79 ~350_
::g.;a~----.--- ---... . ::. ~:~ I ,~~~ - -...-2~~ J~g
Blao:"ll.~tt'Vi!~.~.:......... __..:.:.u. i-. :~~ 1. ~:~ -': -..t:~ '""-:_:';;3:' 18.~
~--_. ... ... .-1"".. .-----
:anria e .. --. . ....-..-------.+ .:g; t ~:~ i ~~: --.- _..~~ I s::~
. ._~- .- - - .. .... --- -.....--:-- - '"" - . -.---
.~r. HUI... _ .. _. _. . _... ; .06 f 2-1 ~.J:.~_. _ . ._.'451 1~,~0
Childress '.06 2-1: 10-96 58 5.817
_u____._. _ .-.- -- I . .- .___n
Cleveland ___._.... _... ~ .05 .11/2-1-,--5-96 _. ..... ____ 681 6J~P
Clute . .07 2-1: 3-96 n 9.130
.......--.. .. ...1 ----...r-.. ,. . .~ - .---.
CodcreIII:t~II.. .... _._..._._oo_. i .0.7... 2-1 : 6-91 _I. 2.51._J.100
Coli e)?!!Itlon , . _. ....~_~~_..L 271 ~ 11-96 I 6~. . .52.226
Converse ; .07 I 2-1 I 10-95 i 65 11.000
.. . .... ...-.-. .. -. .-..--.-.--.-. I' - -. -
Co eras_Co~!.. .. __... i .05 _.I. 2.'... .:_J..o~_?22_ .26,997
pan;ica~_._.___...___._..__... ... : ..9.5. I 2-1 . !~9~..1 .1~_0_ 24.150
Crane ! .07 I 2-1 ' 9-95 23 3,952
~n- --_.......~ .__._.::..=--C .06 C.~2-1 I 1:98-1~~.- ..803 _~~O.OO'
Q8~J~9...L_. __' .oo. i .../F __II _2:L L_.1-96 ! .... ..~.~..~_O-,172.
~ .. .. .._._....~_...'.0_5. ':-LJ..._9-9JL_L._._..,21. 2,68.0.
Dublin : .05 : 1-1 ; 3-96 i 24 2.900
.~:!~ p~ss ---.- ...-. -... .'. ._. .____:._~.:.:~-r2=f -: - 3-97 i . ._.. J79T25-;:S9~
~d~. ... .. . "_"_ ... , .. .05_.....L1.1g-1..! .. '0-95 . I _.... ~.L_5.!.5~.0.
~.s . . .._. _ _.._.._~. ..07 ..i..._2.' 2-96 _..:_.. . 1~.L._~.200
FI~to.l1!.a__. _____. . _. ..---.:..Ol...._ U. 112-,.! .1~5_.I_ -1.5_~.. 1,190_
flayd.ada___.__.._.._. . .i_ .05 I 1 ~B-:l 1D:9.8_J..____~_.3!?69
F~.L_. __. ~ ... .05 1. 1.' 1-97._ i. .2tL 3.560
~~.E~_ ... l :~~ ~.i:~" ~l-l--~i: i 1i:
frien~c~L_.__.~-_..:-.. .07 I _2.1 . ..F~-'I . "1311..24.500_
Frl9n!l__. .. . . ._.._.._~_'.o~.. n.1J2.1 1()'!!5..!... 23 i .__3.:.809
Gainesville .... _... : .05 I 1 112-'. 4-96 i 193 I 14.087
'Ga~q~.__.._... _. .. : ~._.. .07 [" .2-~ -, .jJ:9~~L__)~.!-.s;s:o~r
Goldthwaite : .06 I 2-1 : 1-97 I 12 I 1.785
~~:View-' .-...-... .-..-..-.... -..--:~~ --.F, ~~~~-:-~:+. _.Tf:--.~:g6~'
Graoevlne .. UN... . ...--.... . . .i:j:;-' '""1"'2=1-00 : 1.98 I ---'3'887-2'7,2S7
GraveS..... .. ...-.----... '.0'5- i 1112-''':- 1.99 "------98-:-.';7:090
MaiiDrTi CitY" .. . -.--- ..---. ,- .07' -j'-- 2.~o;g6. 2'5-~32.500
HiaiTi......-- .. --- ----.- .07 '11'1/2-' 10:.95: .. sa-1i.71'"
.. ______. ..__._ "j _. _.__oo .. . 1.-
Hempstead______. .. "':-~'I 2-1. I 5-96 ; _.._~ I .33I.1!2
.~;=~ ea!!~____... ---':.+-=:':~;__ .j ~~.1 ~._~9S;- 'L. _._ .'~~'.1-t~~
H.91)!O. _. . . . __ .___ _. .05. 4- 2.1_. L...~0-97 . I ___ J?:..L ~~80
Hu as Sarin .07 I 2-1 1-98: 10 I 2.196
Page 1 of3
P.2/4
.r~.28.1999
4:45PM rS
NO. 893
e
cmES THAT HAVE ADOPTED THE "2o.YEAR ANY AGE" RETIREMENT ELIGIBILITY
M OF JANUARY 28, 1999.
. EMP. I CURRo I 2O-Y'EAR I NUMBER I
.. DEPOSIT I MATCH. I ANY AGE I CONTRIB. ~_... .--.
H..mble .... . _.ClTY.. ... ._...__~AATE~ I AA~O EFFECi:.LME~~RS+ -P:.q~.
HuntSJiile_"':_. u:. . .~.__.:...~~_. _:~.... ~ "~12:0-.~f:-. +-. -.- ~;~! J~:~:
:.~:ide . ... --.. ._...~.--:~.. -I-~:~ -.,.-t:--+. -. ~~'l ~::~.
~;:~~e~.:. ~.... ... -......... ..~ -I'.. -.:~ -~~~'.~}l.'f: ! ~~: ".:{;!
.. .. .-....---...r.-L. -...... 1"':.1:.
~~.~~..~.::=.::::.-:: .:_.t:;5" I ~l I ;! - ~ ~. . ~~.~i.
Jli!l~. _ _ ..___ '.!f7 -+- '-1 I. JCH6 _ ;._ _Z44t1r.500
KI!!!l'u . 1__' .os '-1 .' ~ -- .-..- 451 7,80'
K~_....__..u__.._._oo....... ....!J7. I 2-:L.+.._l:~__._. 16 _2.900
t:~;~~- ..- ..-.---....-.-.-~ .~; "h~~-d .~:: :..~. _1~~. ..1.~rJ
t:~-~ott!1. ---....--- ...-. -.... "I' ..:~ I ~:~. ~ .}~- ._u__ :~ '00' :~~~
~~~.. n_ -....1-. --.05 -2'-1" 1"- -2~97 I 1,382 ';00,000
Lecl!.'(~!!i=~~-'._--'---~.-.'.'.........06 1'-:i:L.I_.1-9.9 I .1~'fr_"1:oob
.~~e~1d- ... =-:~..~.~_~__.__._LI_''-:~; ~l"~:,. ; ~::_ t.. ... ~~ ~:~;:~~~.
Lockhart .0& I 2-1 . 10-85 I 110 9.944
~If~' ...._... _....._..~~~:..... .1..._.07 .1 ..,!-:,- i' 4-97--' 339 ~_ ~~OOO.
Lei .05 I 2-~ I 4-97, 15! 2.318
----",.... . 1".----1.-- -..' .".-
M~l~Q.'!IILIL___ ...___._u.. __ I.,. .05 I ..2.~ . 11-95 : 28 I ._.~!.~_
M.arble F~lIs _ U'_ ___L.D7 .-l-~-~. .. 1.~! . _7j.J .._5,064
~8~1~_ _. . i ...~_~2.~_...1~-98 . L_.. . 68 i .1,0..01
Mesgui~. ._.. _. _ .._ .._ _....... ._.. L. .07 2..~._ . ._..!9-95_~_ ____.9~9_l...1Q2!~~.
Mexia : .07 2-~ 9-95: 66 I 7.094
t~tij~~':'~eJl!L _ .__.._.. -....-..,. .05 -:.-::~':1" . 1-97 I.. .___ 1.~6" r . 14,46a
~I!.~~_ ... . .. .. . J_.. .05 _.. _00 ~.1 1.0-9.8 _ ~ ._ -2401 28.9B?.
Mis~.C.~.. ._ ... ._._ ._... _ .: ,o~ . __~-1 1.98 ..!....... _ 166 3511~
Mt Pleasant . .05 2-1 1-96' 138 11,820
NacogdoctiSs_~.o~_'L._._':"'_==-~J'~. .06" ~~ 2.1 "1:97-;- .-.. 278 - 2~,f49
New Braunfels NO.1 i. .06 1 1/2-1 1-96: 261 28.000
NeWLOnd'Ori--'-"." .05 ~-,' . -;-98 ';' 9 950
N8WtCn' . . -. .-- ..- -;--.06'''' 2.~ I 10.95 j. 20 119'
Noeona--.' ......---..-..- .. : '.05 11/2-1: 2-96 1 . 21"-2.992
ci;a~_-':'__.._.. . .. . --- i ,.91_~~-2-~_:_i.~95-T. 163 _24.290'
Pampa _.. . _. ._.._.. _, ___: . :05 I 2~ __ ; _12-95 1_ _... ..Jl.2.. 22,780.
Pear1ancl I .07 I 2-~ . 12-95' 180 20.000
~er:rY.tiiri. . n. ....._._..._.......-.. :-.07'- CJ:L~~-97.._L ':'. -81"--'8,009
Pinehum ' .07 ! 1.' 1-96: 22 1.111
i='lano---".'" .... --:07-1'-2.' , ":96-'1"-- 1,412 -128;500
R~~l!!...... . .. . u"_.'-:'_ :::-':':~_...:Q.5_. I.. -.F, __. . 3-96__-~....:...Ji : .~:bOo
Rankin . .05 1.' 1-96. 4 1.312:
RlchisfidHllis- ._.......___.n ., '.07-- 2.' .:.-. 9-96 ..... ''78--8,000 .
RobstDWn'No~ 1 !. .05 i 1.; '-9& -----56' 12.100
Robstown 'No:2" . -.... -.... n . .05 "-;--':;-" 12-95 :'" 71 : -12,100
ROCkcott---' -. .. .-.-.---.o=r..-~-- 2.' . '3-97-.--~- -$;3'00
.~oimd-'~O'C;k__:--.... __'_' .0"?:...__..kL.-1:.9!.-: .---~34S.i__~!P~OO-
S!ln.~9!!lo . . .. .__n__.-:'O~ .._ .2-' ___2:.9-L-_B33 ~ _ ~!480
~a~~'lip No:.:!. _ .' -:.O}_....:........1:!.... __ 4-~7. . .1.t~L....914.350
San Antanio No.2; .06 i' 1J2.~ 10-98; 5,573 . 914.350
San Marcos -.--..-..--- -.----.-! .07 f' 2.' 2-96 ---. -'''382 34.850
sin saba".-" . . . --'---:-06'- .- j' n '2.' .. i:96~' - . ...-34.... . 2:an
SanQ~r '--~"'.'..~='--~:.~ __ ..n.... .05-- ~ _2:L---1~-9~ "~'. . . 317 -'4~1cfo_
Santa Fe .a& I 1.' 1-99. 48 8.429
Page 2 of 3
P.3/'4
J~.28.1999
4:45PM .S
NO. 893
e
cmES THAT !}lAVE ADOPTED THE ''20-YEAR ANY AGE- R!TIReMENT EUGIBIUTY
AS OF JANUARY 28,1999.
I EMP. ~URR. 2O-YEARl NUMBER
. -.- ..- -.-. OEPOSIT MATCH.! ANY AGE . CON'TRIB. ".
._~. _u. cl'r'(.-_ ~'_ ._._ J. RATE~~TI.CU;FF!ct...M BE8S I .POP..
S_c:n!J!~.b~rs. . i .~... L.:._~.1n_l_ 1.99 ~----'-"~r-2'724
Seabrook I .05 r 2.1 I 1-97 85 7,800
_____...o -. -..... .. I' I I .... ... "--
~.e~ovill~._ _._. ___. .._ . . i ..,O~. I .1j!.2:-t i. 11-95 .. ~ 9!~0
S~ . _ . '0' .... n"_' _. ____.J.. _.':~1-__2~..J..~6.. 39. 4.400.
S~tt' . . I .~ .. '1- _~.L ~2.98 _ _ __..._~~_ 17.854
S~I~_ .. _. ._ ...... ..... _. _ .._ .....07. _2-1_..1_.1:.9:8.. 17 65.0.
:~~.. . ... .. .' _ ..' _ . _, ~g~ ! t~ : n .;: . . - .: ~~ 3:~
Smlthv/lle ~.05 1-1 1-96 49 3700
:=i1He~-~--:: === - --. . :.1 .-:g~. j" ti'~:~'-' .~.~- .... nt! 1~
St8tto;d"" I .06 . .. 2.1' I ...10-96.... --. - '-as':" '7.000
S~~li,ynle.-'" ..-.----.-..- .'-:--r'-.os--- 2-1 I ~o-s~ ._.~ to?:. '.5.1i5.9
~____._._. ._ _. . . _I .9_5.. .1.1.[2.:'_1_ _2:~ 12 i ',879
;~:!~~~-":'. ':.-.-.:=~._:::~J.~.j:.. ;;C7' ~~: . ~_.:~~..:af- 1~:;
I.M.L...Ne.' I . ..05 L .2-1 .,' 1~!_.. ._. _.43 ..---9
TerreD .07 r 2.1 11.98 123 14.470
~~.~~ia ~o..T-- -.. .... ..... -r-~07-"~12~1 --;--:-1-98.. 0.. '."_' .~r ~~.l..~o.
Texarkana No.2' .07 2-'! 1.98 172 33.500
Texarkana No:$--- ... . --..-.-- .07 I 2-1 I 1-98 I 153! 33.500
6;;:~7~~=~~='=:-:~:~' ....:~.~. ~~~:~.i~~~i~' =.'.. -~~-:,rJ . ~~;
... -_._~ -. . ..... ..---.-.- '--' ------.
Uvalcle ; .05 I '-1 i 5-98 '11 I 16.650
---- ---.....-.- ...- . ....-. .. . -... . - ..- r-' -- ---. ...... .-.--
Y.!In HJ"!!!_.._ . ...... _.. .. _. ._._..__......: _-:QL_ I 1 112-1 1-96 ._._ __ _..~~m. 2.770
yega _.; .07 I 2-' i 10-95 4 900
Yictoria. . ..! .06 I 2-1 ! 1o-95J .?52 58,100.
~~~~m.. .. _. _ ... . ... _ . . oi. :~;_. 1 1 ~~~.~ ;~:~ . _..... ;;l.1.~:~iI
~:~~~ie . ....:.. :~~- 'i-i~~" .'..~:~_.+..._.-1i~-I..~~::
~:~c:r~rd~.-::~..~-:-:.~.~-:-:.- --~" ..~~~.. -1 ..t~ 1~~-1 ~=-~.'~~ i_.1g:~
Wesleco .... .05' . !.. 2." 6-96' r-'" . -'9,r 21:Ss:f
West"6~nge-.~~:=~.~=...~:.-~-::=_T-:-67- "I.,lii.;- 'S:96'-or-""".~o 23 i' "4.630
'oYest. Wniv. Place .0.6 I _.2::L~.J-98_ -'. _... '1~.1 _.1.~!Q..0_o
~i?~- ...-...-. _..u.. .. ...:~:.. 'd~~~~ i _~_~~.. _.. . .:' .~.jl..~~:~:
Wilmer .05 : 2-1 : 9-95 34 3.400
Page 3 of 3
'P.4/4
e e
e
HoustonGalveston Area Council
PO Box 22777 · 3555limmons · Houston, Texas 77227-2777 · 713/627-3200
Office of the President
January 27, 1999
Hon. Norman Malone
Mayor
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, TX 77572-1115
Dear Mayor Malone:
We are writing to invite the City of La Porte to join the region's local governments in endorsing
the enclosed Principles for Cleaner Air.
These Principles were developed by H-GAC's Regional Air Quality Planning Committee and
adopted in December 1998 by H-GAC's Board of Directors. The Principles emphasize local flexibility,
cost-effectiveness, and public-private collaboration in meeting regional clean air goals.
This region is a severe non-attainment area for ozone. Although major improvements in air
quality have been made, meeting air quality standards will require significant additional efforts by
industry, local governments, small business, and individual citizens.
While the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission is the agency charged with
statewide emission reduction planning, all concerned feel that this issue is so important that a broad
coalition from our area must take a proactive role in developing plans uniquely suited to this region. For
this reason, we hope you will join with other local governments in the region in adopting the regional
clean air principles.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. We hope you will endorse the regional
Principles for Cleaner Air and send a copy of your resolution (sample enclosed) to H-GAC. Endorsement
of the Principles does not commit your jurisdiction to any future action. If you would like more
information on th~ Prim:iples, ur our ~i t:...' ~ air qualiiy situiitiun, ph;a~t: i,;oiJii:icr Jack Stcdt: Of Steve
Howard at H-GAC.
Sincerely,
dJ~
H. Frank Simpson
Commissioner, City of Texas City
H-GAC President
Jack Steele I
H-GAC Executive Director
.. . I .;- -;, , \\1/1.-- ~~
.J, " "r ~ ~ .-. . ,'I 1-'~ b:;:......1
IS/row
Enclosure
JAN 2 8 1999
CITY SECRETARY'S
OFFICE
e
e
WEY WE MUST CLEAN THE REGION'S AIR NOW
The HOI.lstun-Galveston region does not meet the current National Ambient Air Quality
Standard for ground level ozone; therefore, the region, constituted by Harris, Galveston, Fort
Bend, Montgomery, Brazoria, Waller, Chambers and Liberty Counties, has been designated as a
severe non-attainment area by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EP A.
The ozone standard was established by EP A to address health concerns associated with
ozone, particularly among children and adults with pre-existing respiratory disease. Ozone
levels in the Houston-Galveston non-attainment area must be reduced by the year 2007 in order
to comply with the federal standard.
In addition, if an acceptable plan to reach the standard is not developed by the year 2000,
the EP A could halt all federally funded transportation projects, force the implementation of more
intrusive emission control measures and place restrictions on new or expanding business in the
eight county area.
The Challenge
Ozone is a colorless gas formed by the chemical reaction of volatile organic compounds,
or VOCs, and nitrogen oxides, or NOx, in warm, sunny atmospheric conditions. The Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission, or TNRCC, estimates that to comply with the
standard we need to make significant reductions in NOx and VOCs emissions by the year 2007.
This is a significant challenge that the region must move forward to meet. VOCs and NOx come
from four basic sources that we depend upon every day: point sources, such as industry boilers,
furnaces and storage tanks; on-road mobile sources, such as cars, trucks and buses; off-road
sources, such as boats, construction equipment and all-terrain vehicles; and area sources, such as
service stations, dry cleaners and auto paint shops.
The continued growth and diversity of our region make the ozone reductions more crucial
and challenging, particularly in light of the significant reductions in ozone precursors already
achieved. Over the past ten years Harris County grew by over 300,000 residents and growth into
the next century will continue. The seven surrounding counties have added almost 250,000
residents since 1990. Our region includes inner city and suburban residents, small business,
large industry and agricultural interests.
No single county, city or business sector will produce enough NOx and VOC emission
reductions for this region to comply with the fecicral ozone standard. Industry executives and
yardmen, moms and mayors alike must realize that working together now will allow us to reduce
emissions, protect public health, sustain the regional economic growth and avoid harsh federal
sanctions.
e
e
PRINCIPLES FOR CLEANER AIR
Principles to Clean Aur Now
The following principles should guide the creation of a strategy enabling the region to reach
attainment of the ozone standard. A collaborative process involving the various stakeholders in
the region should be utilized to forge air quality solutions from this point forward.
. Contributiollls to ozone non-attainment come from every segment of the region.
Consequently, every person, government entity and all businesses of the region,
including mobile sources, off road construction equipment, permitted or
grandfathered point sources, should do their part to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) and
volatile organic compound (VQC) emissions.
. Control strategies should be implemented as expeditiously as practicable to realize
health benefits and prevent imposition of sanctions upon the region.
. The ozone standard should be attained at the lowest economic and social costs
considering effects on lifestyle to the citizens of the region;
. Local flexibility should be preserved to the greatest extent possible;
. Some emission control strategies are best implemented at the national level, such as
those on automobiles and consumer goods, and, hence, should be accelerated if they
contribute to attainment at lower costs and less adverse impacts than other controls.
. Control strategy options considered should include all technically feasible ones
prioritized by their relative benefit to cost characteristics;
. Economic incentives should be explored as part of the area's attainment approach.
. All reasonable efforts should be made to avoid State Implementation Plan (SIP)
disapproval by EP A. If ozone attainment cannot be reached by reducing ozone
precursors to the maximum technically feasible and cost-efficient extent, other
options to obtain SIP approval will be explored.
. Encourage TNRCC to undertake a comprehensive air quality research strategy to
provide additional scientific information ne.:es'.ary for design of ozone control
programs which can be reasonably expected to reduce ozone formation and public
exposure to ozone.
The public health of area residents, the vibrancy of the region's economy and continued
transportation improvements are only assured if a sound, acceptable ozone compliance plan is
developed and implemented.
Endorsed by Houston-Galveston Area Council Board of Directors on December 15, 1998.
e e
RESOLUTION
99-20
* * * *
WHEREAS, for over a half century fanners and ranchers working in cooperation with local soil and water
conservation districts (SWCD's), have built a legacy proving themselves willing and able to assume responsibility
for the conservation of the state's soil, water and related natural resources; and
WHEREAS, since the 1940's technical assistance provided to landowners by soil and water conservation
districts has been provided by the federal government through the USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS); and
WHEREAS, the reduction offunds appropriated to the USDA-NRCS over the past two decades has drastically
reduced the technical assistance available from this source,' and
WHEREAS, federally mandated programs such as the Fann Bill, the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water
Act, and other environmental laws have drastically increased the workload of soil and water conservation districts
and NRCS Staff, thereby reducing the time available for district assistance to landowners for traditional
conservation planning; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to continue to strengthen voluntary conservation programs to improve management
and efficiency of water use and to improve quality and quantity of water available for the citizens of Texas;
strengthen locally led conservation programs to protect the state's soil resources; strengthen brush management
programs for erosion control, water management and improvement of wildlife habitat, and strengthen brush
management programs for erosion control, water management and improvement of wildlife habitat, and strengthen
voluntary conservation programs for timber stand improvement,' and
WHEREAS, there are many public benefits received from SWCD programs such as: the protection of local
land values and local tax bases; protection of the agriculture productivity base; sustaining local economies,
providing watershed protection and flood control; reducing sedimentation in streams, rivers and lakes,' increasing
or sustaining stream flows; enhancing groundwater recharge; enhancing local municipal and industrial water
supplies; improving fisheries, wetlands and aquatic systems; maintaining stability of the state's overall water
budget; maintaining a healthy wildlife population; helping protect threatened and endangered species improving
air quality; providing community services through soil interpretations for agricultural and community development,'
and improving quality of life;
e
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99- ~ 310
AN ORDINANCE CALLING THE REGULAR ANNUAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF LA
PORTE; CALLING A RUN-OFF ELECTION, IF NECESSARY; DESIGNATING
ELECTION PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES; PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF
VOTING MACHINES; APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS; PROVIDING FOR
METHOD AND DATES OF EARLY VOTING; PROVIDING FOR AN EARLY VOTING
BALLOT BOARD; PROVIDING FOR RETURN AND CANVASS OF VOTES OF SAID
ELECTION; PROVIDING FOR NOTICE; PROVIDING FOR FILING DEADLINE AND
FILING FEES FOR CANDIDATES; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; FINDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
section 1. An election shall be held within the corporate
limits of the City of La Porte, Texas, on the 1st day of May, 1999,
such day being the first Saturday in May, 1999, between seven
o'clock (7:00) A.M. and seven o'clock (7:00) P.M., for the purpose
of electing the following City officials:
Councilperson-at-Large--position B, for a 3 year term
Councilperson--District 1, for a 3 year term
Councilperson--District 6, for a 3 year term
A run-off election, if necessary, shall be held on Saturday,
May 29, 1999, between the same hours.
Section 2 .
Said election shall be held at each of the
following voting places within said City, and the following named
persons are hereby appointed as officers of said election, to-wit:
Election Precinct #1
Pollina Place: Lomax Elementary School
10615 North Avenue "L"
La Porte, Texas 77571
Boundaries:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southern Pacific Railroad
tracks and Spencer Highway (West Main Street);
THENCE westerly along Spencer Highway (West Main Street) to
Big Island Slough;
THENCE northerly along Big Island Slough to north boundary of
Creekmont Subdivision;
e
e
THENCE west along north boundary of Creekmont Subdivision to
Underwood Road;
THENCE north along Underwood Road to the Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks;
THENCE southeasterly along the Southern Pacific Railroad
tracks, following a curve to the south, and continuing in a
southerly direction along the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks
to Spencer Highway (West Main street), to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Melody Elledge
, Presiding Judge
Jeannie Lunsford
, Alternate Presiding Judge
Election Precinct #2
Pollina Place: Baker School Cafetorium
West Main Street and Underwood Road
La Porte, Texas 77571
Boundaries:
BEGINNING at the intersection of the center line of Big Island
Slough and Fairmont Parkway;
THENCE west along Fairmont Parkway to the east boundary line
of the one hundred forty one (141) acre San Jacinto Junior
College site, same being the west boundary line of the former
College View M.U.D. as described in Article 8280-381,
V.A.T.S. ;
THENCE northerly along the west boundary line, and a northerly
projection thereof, of said (College View M.U.D.) to Spencer
Highway (West Main Street);
THENCE east along Spencer Highway (West Main Street) to the
center line of Myrtle Creek Drive;
THENCE south along Myrtle Creek Drive to Cedarmont Drive;
THENCE southerly along Cedarmont Drive to its intersection
with the westerly projection of the rear lot lines of Block 17
in Fairmont Park West Section One;
THENCE southeasterly along the rear lot lines of Block 17 in
Fairmont Park West Section One, passing through Parkmont Drive
and following the rear lot line of Block 18 of Fairmont Park
West Section Two, to Quiet Hill Road;
THENCE westerly along Quiet Hill Road to Willmont Road;
2
e
e
THENCE southerly along Willmont Road to its intersection with
the westerly projection of the rear lot line of Block 35 in
Fairmont Park West Section Two;
THENCE easterly along the rear lot lines of Block 35 in
Fairmont Park West section Two to the center line of Roseberry
Drive;
THENCE northerly along the center line of Roseberry Drive to
the center line of Hillridge Road;
THENCE easterly along the center line of Hillridge Road to the
center line of Big Island Slough;
THENCE southerly along the center line of Big Island Slough to
the intersection of Fairmont Parkway, to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Inge Browder
Richard Browder
, Presiding Judge
Alternate Presiding Judge
Election Precinct #3
Pollina Place: Rizzuto Elementary School
3201 Farrington Boulevard
La Porte, Texas 77571
Boundaries:
BEGINNING at the intersection of an Exxon Pipeline Easement
and Fairmont Parkway;
THENCE west along Fairmont Parkway to center line of Big
Island Slough;
THENCE northerly along the center line of Big Island Slough to
the center line of Hillridge Road;
THENCE westerly along Hillridge Road to the center line of
Roseberry Drive;
THENCE southerly along the center line of Roseberry Drive to
the intersection with the easterly projection of the rear lot
line of Block 35 in Fairmont Park West Section Two;
THENCE westerly along the rear lot line of Block 35 in
Fairmont Park section Two to the center line of Willmont Road;
THENCE northerly along the center line of willmont Road to the
center line of Quiet Hill Road;
3
e
e
THENCE easterly along the center line of Quiet Hill Road to
the intersection of the southeasterly projection of the rear
lot line of Block 18 in Fairmont Park West Section Two;
THENCE northwesterly along the rear lot line of Block 18 in
Fairmont Park West section Two, passing through Parkmont Drive
and becoming the rear lot line of Block 17 Fairmont Park West
Section One to Cedarmont Drive;
THENCE northerly along Cedarmont Drive to Myrtle Creek Drive;
THENCE northerly along Myrtle Creek Drive to Spencer Highway
(West Main Street);
THENCE west along Spencer Highway (West Main Street) to
Underwood Road;
THENCE north along Underwood Road to the north boundary of the
Creekmont Subdivision;
THENCE east along the north boundary of the Creekmont
Subdivision to Big Island Slough;
THENCE southerly along Big Island Slough to Spencer Highway
(West Main Street);
THENCE east along Spencer Highway (West Main Street) to an
Exxon Pipeline Easement;
THENCE southerly along an Exxon Pipeline Easement to Fairmont
Parkway, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Joeena Davis
, Presiding Judge
JaRs Wggg
Alternate Presiding Judge
Election Precinct #4
Pollina Place: Dewalt Special Services Center
Madison and North 6th Street
La Porte, Texas 77571
Boundaries:
BEGINNING at the intersection of North Broadway Street and the
Southern Pacific Railroad tracks;
THENCE south along North Broadway Street to Barbour's cut
Boulevard;
THENCE east along Barbour's Cut Boulevard to North Brownell
Avenue;
4,
e
e
THENCE south along North Brownell Avenue to East Madison
street;
THENCE east along East Madison street to North Holmes Avenue;
THENCE southerly along North Holmes Avenue to East Main
street;
THENCE westerly along East Main street to South Broadway
Street;
THENCE south along South Broadway Street to West "A" Street;
THENCE west along West "A" Street to State Highway 146;
THENCE south along state Highway 146 to West "B" Street;
THENCE west along West "B" street to South 13th Street;
THENCE south along South 13th Street to West "E" Street;
THENCE west along West "E" Street to the Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks;
THENCE north along Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, following
a curve to the east of said railroad tracks;
THENCE easterly along the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks to
North Broadway Street, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Bettv Moore
, Presiding Judge
Fr"ancis Jordan
, Alternate Presiding Judge
Election Precinct #5
Pollina Place: LPISD Office Annex
301 East Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
Boundaries:
TRACT I
BEGINNING at the intersection of Barbour's Cut Boulevard and
North Brownell Avenue;
THENCE east along Barbour's Cut Boulevard to Donaldson Avenue;
THENCE southeasterly along Donaldson Avenue to the shoreline
of Galveston Bay;
THENCE southerly along the shoreline of Galveston Bay to the
5
e
e
north city limit line of Shoreacres, (or the south line of
Tract I);
THENCE west along the north city limit line of Shoreacres (or
the south line of Tract I) to South Broadway Street (Old
Highway 146);
THENCE north along South Broadway Street (Old Highway 146) to
East Main Street;
THENCE easterly along East Main Street to North Holmes Avenue;
THENCE northerly along North Holmes Avenue to East Madison
. Street;
THENCE west along East Madison Street to 'North Brownell
Avenue;
THENCE north along North Brownell Avenue to Barbour's Cut
Boulevard, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
TRACT II
BEGINNING at the intersection of South Broadway street (Old
Highway 146) and the south city limit line of Shoreacres (or
the north line of Tract II);
THENCE easterly along the south city limit line of Shoreacres
(or the north line of Tract II) to the shoreline of Galveston
Bay;
THENCE southerly along the shoreline of Galveston Bay to the
south city limit line of La Porte (or the south line of Tract
II);
THENCE westerly along the south city limit line of La Porte
(or the south line of Tract II) to South Broadway Street (Old
Highway 146);
THENCE north along South Broadway Street (Old Highway 146) to
the south city limit line of Shoreacres (or the north line of
Tract II) to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Cathy Emrick
, Presiding Judge
Mary Ann Trainer
, Alternate Presiding Judge
Election Precinct #6
Pollina Place: La Porte City Hall
604 West Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
6
e
e
Boundaries:
BEGINNING at the intersection of West "A" street and South
Broadway Street;
THENCE south along South Broadway Street to the south city
limit line of La Porte;
THENCE west along the south city limit line of La Porte to the
west right-of-way line of State Highway 146;
THENCE northeasterly along the west right-of-way line of State
Highway 146 to McCabe Road;
THENCE west along McCabe Road to the Southern Pacific Railroad
tracks;
THENCE north along the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks to
Fairmont Parkway;
THENCE west along Fairmont Parkway to the Humble Pipeline
Company right-of-way;
THENCE northeasterly along the Humble Pipeline Company right-
of-way to West Main Street;
THENCE east along West Main Street to the Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks;
THENCE south along the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks to
West "E" Street;
THENCE east along West "E" Street to South 13th Street;
THENCE north along South 13th Street to West "B" Street;
THENCE east along West "B" street to state Highway 146;
THENCE north along state Highway 146 to West "A" street;
THENCE east along West "A" Street to South Broadway Street and
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Election Officials:
Jim Zoller
, Presiding Judge
Elizabeth Brown
Elizabeth Brown
Robinson Capen
, Alternate Presiding Judge
P.residing Judge - Run-Off
Alternate Presiding Judge - Run-Off
Earlv Votina Place:
La Porte City Hall
604 West Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
7
e
e
Section 3. Voting at said election, including early voting,
shall be by the use of voting machines, and the ballots of said
election shall conform to the Texas Election Code, as amended.
section 4. An Early Voting Ballot Board is hereby created to
process Early Voting results for the election and the runoff
Charlotte Boudreaux
election, if necessary.
is appointed
Presiding Judge of the Early Voting Ballot Board. At least two (2)
other members of the Early Voting Ballot Board shall be appointed
by the Presiding Judge, in the same manner as the precinct election
clerks.
Early Voting by personal appearance shall begin on the 17th
day and shall continue through the 4th day preceding the day of
election.
Early Voting by mail shall begin on the 45th day preceding the
date of the election, or as soon thereafter as ballots are
available, and shall continue until seven o'clock (7:00) P.M. on
election day.
Early Voting shall be conducted by a clerk for Early Voting,
Martha A. Gillett
namely,
, and the place at which the
Early Voting shall be conducted is designated as the La Porte City
Hall, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, to which address
ballot applications and ballots voted by mail may be mailed. Early
Voting by personal appearance shall be conducted on the weekdays of
the early voting period and during the hours that the City
Secretary's main business office is regularly open for business.
Section 5. The Council Conference Room of the La Porte City
Hall is hereby designated as the Central Counting station to
receive all ballots cast at said election, and Martha A. Gillett is
8
e
e
hereby appointed the Presiding Manager for said Central Counting
station. said Manager shall appoint any clerks necessary to assist
in receiving ballots and other records and in performing the other
duties of said Manager in this regard. The City Manager is hereby
authorized and directed to obtain, or cause to be obtained, the
necessary electronic tabulating equipment, to arrange for the
testing thereof as provided by law and to employ a duly qualified
manager and a duly qualified tabulation supervisor to perform the
duties respecti vely imposed on them by law with respect to the
processing and tabulation of ballots at the Central Counting
station.
section 6. That all election materials including notice of
the election, ballots, instruction cards, affidavits and other
forms which voters may be required to sign and all early voting
materials shall be printed in both English and Spanish, or spanish
translations thereof shall be made available in the circumstances
permitted and in the manner required by law.
section 7. The City Secretary of the City of La Porte shall
forthwith issue Notice of said election by causing a substantial
copy of this Ordinance to be published one time in the BAY SHORE
SUN, which is hereby found and declared to be a newspaper of
general circulation in said City, not less than ten (10) days nor
more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of the said election.
Section 8. Upon a candidate tendering his application on the
form prescribed, the City Secretary shall furnish to such candidate
all information relative to the qualifications for the office being
sought; the method of placing the candidate's name on the ballot;
the amount of the required filing fee; and any other pertinent
9
e
e
information concerning said election;
Section 9. Each candidate for the office of Mayor must be a
resident elector of the city. Each candidate for the office of
District Councilperson must also be a resident of the district for
which he files.
Section 10. The deadline for a candidate to make application
to have his name appear upon the ballot for such election, is
hereby designated and established as 5:00 o'clock P.M., Wednesday,
March 17, 1999. No application shall be accepted for filing prior
to February 15, 1999. The filing fee for each candidate for the
office of Councilperson is hereby established as Fifty Dollars
($50.00). The filing fees shall be used to defray the cost of the
election, and said fees shall be prorated and any surplus shall be
refunded to said candidates. As an alternative to paying a filing
fee, a candidate may obtain a place on the ballot by filing a
petition as provided for in City of La Porte Home Rule Charter,
Article 2.04 c.3.
Section 11. Said election shall be held in accordance with
the provisions of the city Charter of the City of La Porte, and the
general election laws of the State of Texas governing general and
municipal elections, so far as same may be applicable thereto.
Section 12. Immediately after said election, the officers
holding the same shall make and deliver the returns of the results
thereof and the accompanying records for use in the official
canvass to the City Council of the City of La Porte, and the City
Council shall canvass said returns at the earliest practicable
time, and shall, immediately after canvassing the returns, declare
the results of the election. The Mayor shall immediately
10
e
e
thereafter deliver to the candidate for whom the majority of votes
has been polled for each respective office, a certificate of
election. Such elected officials shall assume their duties within
ten (10) days thereafter, Sundays excluded, upon their taking the
oath of office.
section 13. Each and every provision, paragraph, sentence and
clause of this Ordinance has been separately considered and passed
by the City Council of the City of La Porte, Texas, and each said
provision would have been separately passed without any other
provision, and if any provision hereof shall be ineffective,
invalid or unconstitutional, for any cause, it shall not impair or
affect the remaining portion, or any part thereof, but the valid
portion shall be in force just as if it had been passed alone.
Section 14. This Ordinance shall be in effect immediately
upon its passage and approval.
Section 15. The City Council officially finds, determines,
recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date,
hour, place and subject of this meeting of the city Council was
posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the
ci ty for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as
required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required
by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject
matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted
upon. The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms
such written notice and the contents and posting thereof.
11
e
e
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of February, 1999.
ATTEST: 14-.-'
_[La, ,(iM
ar ha A. Gillett
City Secretary
~vJ~
Knox W. Askins
City Attorney
By:
12
e
e
DECRETO NO. 99-2310-A
PAR ENMENDAR UN lllECRETO QUE ORDENA LA ELECCION REGULAR ANUAL DE LA
CIUDAD DE LA PORTE; ORDENA ELECCIONES FINALES CUANDO SEA NECESARIO;
DESIGNANDO LOS DISTRITOS ELECTORALES Y LUGARES DE VOTACION; PROVEE
PARA EL USO DE MAQUINAS DE VOTACION; NOMBRA OFICIALES DE LA ELECCION;
PROVEE MEDIOS Y FECHAS PARA VOTACION TEMPRANA; PROVEE UNA PIZARRA
DONDE SE ANUNCIE LOS RESULTADOS DE LAS VOTACIONES TEMPRANAS; PROVEE
LOS RESULTADOS E INTERPRETACION DE LOS VOTOS DE DICHA ELECCION;
PROVEE NOTIFICA TJIONES; PROVEE FECHAS LIMITES Y COSTO DE REGISTRO DE
CANDIDA TOS; PROVEE UNA CLAUSULA DE AHORRO; ASEGURA EL CUMPLIMIENTO
CON LA LEY DE ASAMBLEA DE LmRE ACCESO; Y PROVEE LA FECHA EN LA CUAL
TENDRA EFECTO.
SEA DECRETADO POR EL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL DE LA CroDAD DE LA PORTE:
Seccion 1. Una eleccion s:e lIevara a cabo dentro de los limites incorporados de la ciudad de La
Porte, Tejas, ell de Mayo de 1999, dicho dia siendo el primer Sabado de Mayo de 1999, entre las
siete de la manana (7:00A.M.) y las siete de la noche (7:00P.M.); con el proposito de elegir los
siguientes funcionarios de la Ciudad:
Consejero Municnpal General- Puesto B, por un termino de 3 anos
Consejero - Distrjto 1, por un terminG de 3 anos
Consej ero - Distrnto 6, por un terminG de 3 anos
Si es necesario, elecciones finales se lIevaran acabo el 30 de Mayo de 1999, durante las mismas
horas.
Seccion 2. Dichas eleccions seran lIevadas a cabo en los siguientes lugares de votaciones de dicha
ciudad, y las siguientes personas son nombradas oficiales de dicha eleccion, es decir:
Distrito Electoral # 1
Lugar de Votacion: Lomax Elementary School
10615 North Avenue "L"
La Porte, Texas 77571
Limites:
Comenzando en la intersteccion de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific y Spencer Highway (Ia calle
West Main);
Desde alii al oeste, a 10 la:rgo de la Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main) a Big Island Slough;
Desde alii al norte, a 10 largo de sobre Big Island Slough allimite norte de la Subdivicion de
Creekmont;
,
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 2
Desde alii al oeste sobre ellimite norte de la Subdivicion de Creekmont hasta Underwood Road;
Desde el norte sobre Uncllerwood Road hasta los rieles del tren Southern Pacific (Southern Pacific
Railroad Track);
Desde alii hacia el sureste a 10 largo de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific siguiendo la curva hacia
el sur y continuando en direccion al sur a 10 largo de las lineas del tren Southern Pacific hasta
Spencer Highway (Ia caIRe West Main), hasta el punto del COMIENZO.
Oficiales Electorales:
Mellody Elledge - Juez que precide
Jealllnie Lunsford - Juez Suplente
Distrito Electoral # 2
Luqar de Votacion: Baker School Cafetorium
West Main Street and Underwood Road
La Porte, Texas 77571
Limites:
COMENZANDO en la iInterseccion de la linea central de Big Island Slough y Fairmont Parkway;
Desde el oeste sobre Fairmont Parkway hacia ellimite este de los 141 acres del San Jacinto Junior
College, siendo este mismo ellimite del oeste del que era College View M.U.D., como 10 describe el
articulo 8280-381, V.A. T.S.
Desde alii hacia el norte 2110 largo de la linea limite oeste, y de la parte norte de la proyeccion de
ello, de dicho (College View M.U.D.) hasta Spencer Highway (West Main);
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main) hasta la linea centrica de
Myrtle Creek Drive;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de Myrtle Creek Drive hasta Cedarmont Drive;
Desde alii al sur sobre Cedarmont Drive hasta su interseccion con la proyeccion del oeste de la
lineas traceras de los lotes de la cuadra 17 en Fairmont Park West Seccion Uno;
Desde alii hacia el sureste a 10 largo de las lineas traceras de la cuadra 17 en Fairmont Park West
Seccion Uno, pasando pOll" Parkmont Drive y siguiendo las lineas traceras de la cuadra 18 de
Fairmont Park West Sec~ion Dos, basta Quiet Hill Road;
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 3
Desde alii aI oeste sobre Quiet Hill Road a Willmont Road;
Desde alii aI sur sobre Willmont Road a su interseccion con la proyeccion del oeste de las lineas
tracera de la cuadra 35 en Fairmont Park West Seccion Dos;
Desde alii al este sobre las lineas traceras de la cuadra 35 en Fairmont Park West, Seccion Dos
hacia la linea central de Roseberry Drive;
Desde alii allado norte sabre la linea central de Roseberry Drive hacia la linea central de Hillridge
Road;
Desde alii allado este sobre la linea de Hillridge Road hacia la linea central de Big Island Slough;
Desde alii aI sur sobre la linea central de Big Island Slough a la interseccion de Fairmont
Parkway, hasta el punto del COMIENZO.
Oficiales Electorales:
Jnga Browder - Juez que precide
Richard Browder - Juez Suplente
Distrito Electoral # 3
Lugar de votacion: Rizzuto Elementary School
32011 Farrington Boulevard
La Porte, Texas 77571
Limites:
COMENZANDO en la interseccion del derecho de paso de la turbia de Exxon y Fairmont
Parkway;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo de Fairmont Pakrway hasta la linea central de Big Island Slough;
Desde el norte a 10 largo de la linea central de Big Island Slough hasta la linea central de Hillridge
Road;
Bacia el oeste sobre Hillridge Road hasta la linea central de Roseberry Drive; Bacia ellado sur a
10 largo de la linea central de Roseberry Drive basta la interseccion con la proyeccion del este de la
linea tracera de la cuzndra 35 en Fairmont Park West Seccion Dos;
Desde el oeste a 10 largo liinea tracera de la cuadra 35 en Fairmont Park Seccion Dos, hasta la linea
central de Willmont Road;
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 4
Hatia ellado norte a 10 llilrgo de la linea central de Willmont Road, hasta la linea central de Quiet
Hill Road;
Desde ellado este a 10 largo de la linea central de Quiet Hill Road hasta la intersection de la
proyection del sureste de la linea tracera de la cuadra 18 en Fairmont Park West Seccion Dos;
Desde el noroeste a 10 largo de la linea tracera de la cuadra 18 en Fairmont Park West Section
Dos, pasando por Parkmant Drive y convirtiendose en la linea tracera de la cuadra 17 Fairmont
Park West Section uno hasta Cedarmont Drive;
Desde el norte a 10 largo de Cedarmont Drive hasta Myrtly Creek Drive;
Desde el norte a 10 largo de Myrtle Creek Drive hasta Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main);
Desde el oeste a 10 largo rlIe Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main) hasta Underwood Road;
Desde el norte sobre Underwood Road allimite norte de la subdvition de Creekmont;
Del limite este a 10 largo del limite norte de la subdivicion de Creekmont hasta Big Island Slough;
Desde el sur a 10 largo de Big Island Slough hasta Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main);
Desde el este a 10 largo de Spencer Highway (Ia calle West Main) hasta el derecho de paso de la
tuberia de Exxon;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo del derecho de paso de la tuberia de Exxon hasta Fairmont Parkway,
hasta el punto del COMIENZO.
Oficiales Electorales:
Jo Davis - Juez que Precide
Jana Wood - Juez Suplente
Distrito Electoral # 4
Lugar de votation: Dewalt Special Services Center
Madison and North 6th Street
La Porte, Texas 77571
LIMITES:
COMENZANDO en la intersection de la calle North Broadway y los rieles del tren Southern
Pacific;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la calle North Broadway a Barbour's Cut Boulevard;
..-
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 5
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de Barbour's Cut Boulevard ala Avenida North Brownell;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la Avenida North Brownell a la calle East Madison;
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de la calle East Madison a la Avenida North Holmes;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la Avenida North Holmes a la calle East Main;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo de la calle East Main a la calle South Broadway;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la calle South Broadway a la calle West "A";
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo de la calle West "A" a State Highway 146;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de State Highway 146 a la calle West "B";
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo de la calle West "B" a la calle South 13;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la calle South 13 a la calle West "E";
Desde alii al oeste sobre Ra calle West "E" hasta los rieles del tren Southern Pacific;
Desde alii al norte a 10 lall"go de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific, siguiendo la curva al este de
dicho rieles de tren;
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific hasta la calle North Broadway, al
punto del COMIENZO.
Oficiales de Electorales:
Betty Moore - Juez que precide
Francis Jordan - Juez suplente
Distrito Electoral # 5
Lugar de votacion: La Porte ISD Office Annex
301 East Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
Limites:
ZONA I
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 6
COMENZANDO en la iJIlterseccion de Barbour's Cut Boulevard y la Avenida Nortb Brownell;
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de Barbour's Cut Boulevard basta la Avenida Donaldson;
Desde alii al sureste a 10 largo de la Avenida Donaldson basta la linea costera de Galveston Bay;
Desde alii al sureste a 10 llargo de la linea costera de Galveston Bay a la linea norte del limite de la
ciudad de Sboreacres, (0 la linea sur de la Zona I);
Desde alii al oeste a 10 lall"go del limite norte de la ciudad de Sboreacres (0 en la linea sur de la
Zonal) a la calle Soutb Broadway (que fue, Highway 146);
Desde alii al norte a 10 largo de la calle South Broadway (que fue Highway 146) a la calle East
Main;
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de la calle East Main a la A venida North Holmes;
Desde alii al norte a 10 largo de la Avenida North Holmes hasta la calle East Madison;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo de la calle East Madison hasta la Avenida North Brownell;
Desde alii al norte a 10 largo de la Avenida North Brownell hasta Barbour's Cut Boulevard, hasta
el punto del COMIENZO
ZONA n
COMENZANDO en la interseccion de la calle South Broadway (que fue Highway 146) y ellimite
sur de la ciudad de Shoreacres (0 la linea norte de la Zona ll);
Desde alii al este a 10 largo del limite sur de la ciudad de Shoreacreas (0 la linea norte de la Zona
ll) a la linea costera de Galveston Bay;
Go
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la linea costera de Galveston Bay hasta ellimite sur de la ciudad de
La Porte (0 la linea sur de la Zona ll);
Desde alii al oeste a 10 largo del limite sur de la ciudad de La Porte (0 linea sur de la Zona ll) hasta
la calle South Broadway (que fue, Highway 146);
Desde alii al norte a 10 largo de la calle South Broadway (que fue, Highway 146) hasta el sur de la
ciudad de Shoreacres (0 linea norte de la Zona ll) ,Ill punto del COMIENZO.
Oficales Electorales:
Cathy Emrick - Juez q'lIe precide
Mary Ann Trainer - Juez Suplente
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 7
Distrito Electoral # 6
Lugar de V otacion: La Porte City Hall
604 W. Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
Limites:
COMENZANDO con la interseccion de la calle West "A" y la calle South Broadway;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de la calle South Broadway hasta ellimite sur de la ciudad de La Porte;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 la:rgo del limite sur de la ciudad de La Porte hasta el oeste de la linea del
derecho de via de State Highway 146;
Desde alii allado noresete a 10 largo del este de la linea del derecho de via de State Highway 146 a
McCabe Road;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 lall'go de McCabe Road hasta los rieles del tren Southern Pacific;
Desde alii al norte a 10 largo de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific hasta Fairmont Parkway;
Desde alii al oeste a 10 lall'go de Fairmont Parkway hasta el derecho de via de Humble Pipeline
Company;
Desde alii al noreste a 10 largo del derecho de via de Humble Pipeline Company hasta la calle West
Main;
Desde alii aI este a 10 largo de la calle West Main hasta los rieles del tren Southern Pacific;
Desde alii al sur a 10 largo de los rieles del tren Southern Pacific hasta la calle West "E";
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de la calle West "E" hasta la calle South 13;
Desde alii al Dorte a 10 largo de la calle South 13 hasta la calle West "B";
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de la calle West "B" hasta State Highway 146;
Desde alii al Dorte a 10 largo de State Highway 146 hasta la calle West "A";
Desde alii al este a 10 largo de la calle West "A" a la calle South Broadway hasta el punto del
COMIENZO
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 8
Oficiales Electorales:
Jim Zoller - Juez que precide
Elizabeth Brown - Juez Suplente
Lugares de Votacion Temprana: La Porte City Hall
604 West Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
Seccion 3. La votacion elll dicha eleccion, incluyendo la Votacion Temprana, sera con el uso de
maquinas de votacion, y la papeleta de votacion de dicha eleccion, sera conforme el Codigo
Electoral de Tejas, a como ha sido enmendado.
Seccion 4. Una junta de Votacion Temprana es creada para procesar los resultados de las
elecciones de votacion temprana y si fuera necesario para votaciones finales. Charlotte Boudreax,
es nombrada como la Juez que Precide la Votacion Temprana. Por 10 menos otros dos miembros
de la junta seran nombrmdos por el juez que precide, y en la misma manera como asistente de
eleccion del distrito electlDral.
Votaciones tempranas en persona comenzaran el dia 17 y continuaran hasta el dia cuarto
precediendo la eleccion.
Votaciones tempranas per correo comenzran el dia 45 precediendo la fecha de eleccion y
continuaran hasta las side de la noche (7:00 P.M.) el dia de la eleccion.
Votaciones tempranas seran conducidas pro la secreta ria de Votaciones Tempranas, Secreta ria
Interina Martha Gillett, y ellugar en el cuallas Votaciones Tempranas seran conducidas es
designado como La Porte City Hall, 604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte, Texas, a cuya
direccion las aplicaciones para las papeletas de votacion y la votacion hecha por correo podran ser
enviadas. Votaciones tempranas hechas en persona seran conducidas en los dias designados para
votaciones tempranas durante las horas que la oficina principal de negocious de la Secreta ria de la
Ciudad se encuentra abierta al publico.
Seccion 5. EI cuarto de conferencia del consejo de la ciudad de La Porte, esta aqui designado
como la Estacion Central de Contaduria para recibir todas las papeletas de votacion de dicha
eleccion, y Martha Gillett es nombrada como la Gerente que precide dicha Estacion Central de
Contaduria. Dicha Gerente nombrara cualquier asistente para ayudar a recibir las papeletas de
votacion y otros documentos, y podra ejecutar otros trabajos delegados por dicha Gerente
concernientes con dicho proyecto. EI administrador de la ciudad esta autorizado a obtener 0
hacer que se obtenga el equipo electronico de tabular necesario, de ordenar la prueba de alii en
adelante como es proveido por la ley y de emplear un adminstrador calificado y an un supervisor
de tabulacion calificado para desempenar sus deberes respectivamente impuestos por la ley con
respecto al proceso y tabudacion de papeletas de votacion en la Estacion Central de Contabilidad.
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 9
Seccion 6. Que todo el material de eleccion incluyendo aviso de eleccion, papeletas de votacion,
tarjetas de instrucciones, juramentos y otras formas querequieran que el votante sea requerido a
firmar y todo el material para la votacion temprana seran impresas en Ingles y Espanol, 0 la
traduccion del Espanol sua disponible en las circumstancias permitidas y en la manera que 10
requiere la ley.
Seccion 7. La Secreta ria de la Ciudad de La Porte emitira enseguida un aviso de dicha elecion al
hacer que una copia verdadera de este Decreto sean publicadas una vez en el BAYSHORE SUN, el
cual se ha encontrado y confirmado ser un Periodico de circulacion general de dicha Ciudad, no
menos de diez (10) dias Cl mas de treinta (30) dias antes de la fecha de dicha eleccion.
Seccion 8. AI entregar el candidato su aplicacion en la forma prescrita, la Secretaria de la ciudad,
dara a dicho candidato toda la informacion necesaria para la calificacion de puesto que se esta
buscando; el metoda de colocar el nombre del candidato en las papeletas de votacion; la cantidad
de dinero requerido para registrarse; y cualquier otra informacion necesaria que tenga que ver
con la eleccion.
Seccion 9. Cada candidato para el puesto de Alcalde debera de ser un residente votatnte de la
ciudad. Cada candidato para el puesto de Consejero de Distrito, tam bien debera de ser residente
del distrito por el cual se esta registrando.
Seccion 10. La fecha de vencimiento para que el candidato haga su aplicacion, para que su
nombre aparezca en las papeletas de votacion, esta aqui designada y establecida como las 5:00
P.M. (cinco de la tarde), Miercoles 17 de Marzo de 1999. Ninguna aplicacion sera aceptada para
registrarse antes dellS de Febrere de 1999. EI precio del registro para cada candidato para
consejero est a establecido que sera de $50.00, (cincuenta dolares). Este dinero sera usado para
costear los gastos de la elltccion, y dicho precio sera prorrateado y si hay sobrante sera regresado a
dichos candidatos. Como alternativa para pagar el registro, el candidato puede obtener un lugar
ella papeleta de votaciom alllenar una peticion proveida por la carta constitucional del gobierno
propio de la Ciudad de La Porte, Articulo 2.04 c.3.
Seccion 11. Dicha eleccion sera lIevada a cabo de acuerdo con las proviciones de la carta
constitucional de La Ciudad de La Porte, y las leyes de las elecciones generales del Estado de Tejas
de gobemando eleccionem generales y elecciones municipales, siempre y cuando esto sea aplicable a
ello.
Seccion 12. Inmediatamente despues de dichas elecciones, el oficial encargado hara la entrega de
105 resultados y de 105 documentos acomplanantes para el uso de una encuesta oficial del consejo
municipal de la Ciudad de La Porte; y el Consejo Municipal de la Ciudad interpretara dichos
reultados 10 mas pronto posible, e inmediatamente despues de haberlos interpretado, declararan
los resultados de la eleccion. EI Alcalde inmediatamente Ie entregara al candidato por el cualla
mayoria han votado para cada puesto, un certificado de eleccion. Dicho oficial elegido asumira
sus responsabilidades en ios sigientes diez (10), dias, excluyendo el Domingo, al haber recibido
juramento al asumir el cargo.
e
e
Decreto No 99-2310-A
Pagina 10
Seccion 13. Toda y cada provicion, parrafo, oracion y c1ausula de este Decreto, ha sido
considerado separadamente y aprovado por el Consejo Municipal de la Ciudad de La Porte, Tejas
y cada dicha provision pudo haber sido aprobada separadamente sin ninguna otra provision, y si
alguna provision de aqui en adelante no es efectiva, invalida inconstitucional, por cualquier
motivo, no impedira 0 afectara el resto de la provicion, 0 ninguna otra parte, pero la parte valida
sera enforzada como si hubiese sido aprovada separadamente.
Seccion 14. Este Decreto estara en efecto inmediatamente al ser aprovado.
Seccion 15. El Consejo Municipal encuentra, determina, recita, y declara que un aviso por escrito
con la fecha, hora, lugar y objeto de esta reunion del consejo municipal, fue puesta en un lugar
conveniente para el publico en la Municipalidad de la Ciudad con el tiempo requerido por la ley
prececiendo esta reunion, como 10 es requerido por la Ley de Asamblea de Libre Acceso, Capitulo
551, c1ave del Gobiemo de Tejas, y que esta asamblea ha sido abierta al publico todo el tiempo que
es requerido por la ley durante el cual este decreto y cualquier otro asunto haya sido discutido,
considerado y formalmente aceptado. EI Consejo Municipal ratifica, aprueba, y confirma dichos
avisos por escrito y el contenido de anunciarlo de alii en adelante.
ACEPTADO Y APROV ADO este dia 8 de Febrero de 1999.
CIDDAD DE LA PORTE
POR:~~
, s rman L. alon, Alcalde
TESTIFICA:
~lLa . }J l1f!JJ
ha A. Gillett, Secretaria de la Ciudad
APROYAJJOPOR: /,/"7
a/c) //
). ..' I
eff"-VZ( .~~
s/Knox W. Askins, Abogado de la Ciudad
e
e
REouA FOR CITY COUNcn.. AGENDA &
Agenda Date Requested: Febnuuy 8. 1999
Requested By: Robert T. Herrera Department: Administration
_ Report _ ResoHution XXX Ordinance
Exhibits:
1. Ordinance No. 99-2311
2. Letter to Commissioner Fonteno
3. Letter from Banis County
3. Proposed Agreement between City of La Porte and Harris County -
Sunrise Drainage Improvements Project
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
The attached agreement from Harris County allows the City of La Porte to join forces with the County and the City of
Shoreacres to address drainage improvements proposed for Sunrise Blvd.
The City's portion for this joint venture is $100,000.00, and funds were budgeted for this particular project within the
Capital Improvement Project in account # 015-9892-769 of the 1998-99 budget. The agreement calls for the City of
Shoreacres to pay $100,000.00, as well, with Harris County to make up the difference of approximately $631,305.00. It
is estimated that the total project: cost will be near $831,305.00.
The City of Shoreacres has executed an identical agreement and forwarded it to Harris County.
Our funding portion is limited to $100,000.00 as is the portion from the City of Shoreacres. If approved, our funds will
not be forwarded to Harris County until the County Commissioners vote to affinn the agreement. Once this is done,
Harris County will require our funds within 30 days.
Action Required by Counci1l:
Approve the agreement with Hanis County as recommended by staff
Availability of Funds:
General Fund WaterlWastewater
XXX Capital Improvement _ General Revenue Sharing
Other
Account Number: 015-9892-769 Funds Available: XXX YES NO
Aooroved for City Council A2enda
~~ ~. ~ 1..-'-\.-1\,
Robert T. Herrera Date
City Manager
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 2311
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF LA PORTE AND BARRIS COUNTY, TO CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO SUNRISE DRIVE; APPROPRIATING $100,000.00, TO FUND
SAID CONTRACT; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO
THE SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes
the contract, agreement, or other undertaking described in the
title of this ordinance, in substantially the form as shown in the
document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute such document
and all related documents on behalf of the City of La Porte. The
City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all such
signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such documents.
City Council appropriates the sum not to exceed $100,000.00 from
the Capital Improvement Fund, to fund said contract.
Section 2.
The City Council officially finds, determines,
recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date,
hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was
posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the
ci ty for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as
required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required
by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject
matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted
upon.
The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms
such written notice and the contents and posting thereof.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after
its passage and approval, and it is so ordered.
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 2311
e
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of February, 1999.
ATTEST:
~~,a. ~{!JiA
Mar ha A. Gillett,
City Secretary
I
AP;7Z uJ~~~
Knox W. Askins,
City Attorney
By:
2l~::;~
o an L. Malone,
Mayor
PAGE 2
e
e.
City of La Porle
Established 1892
September 17, 1998
The Honorable fun Fonteno
Harris County Commissioner - Precinct Two
1001 Preston, Room 950
Houston, Texas 77002
RE: Sunrise Drive Drainage Project
Dear Commissioner Fonteno:
The City of La Porte has set aside 5100,000 for a joint venture with Harris County and the City of
Shoreacres to participate in the Sunrise Drive Drainage Project. Our budget year begins
October 1, 1998.
Our cost sharing is not to exceed 5100,000 and also is limited to the level of contribution paid by the
City of Shoreacres. We would like to pay our portion on a percentage of work completed and will
require a detailed cost breakdown.
If this concept meets with your approval, please indicate in writing so I may set up an expense
account for this project. Will your office prepare an interlocal agreement?
I look forward to combining our resources for this proposed project to benefit our citizens.
Sincerely,
G~~~ T \lt~~
Robert T. Herrera
City Manager
RTH:cjb
c Mr. Elmo Wright
Mayor and Council
..
P.O. a...,x 111: · L.l:' .'rte. Tex.l:; ;-:-5;"2- tE: · (2~ i) 471-3i)::;U.
e
HARRIS COUNTY
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
e
1001 Preston Avenue
Seventh Floor
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 755-5370
7 January 1999
Mr. Robert T. Herrera, City Manager
City of La Porte
P.O. Box 1115
laPorte, Texas 77572-1115
SUBJECT: Sunrise Drive Drainage Project
(:~: ,; '.:" 'i..:;..\',.~,'.' ~ ..
_.....~_:.~ - Q t:_J~.::L'1.-~Gb
~~ I - d-~~~
~#._\l"'II:.:-A.. ~I\."""'~ .. t'l'aA... -..........~.- ....~.. "
Dear Mr. Herrera:
Per our telephone conversation, attached are duplicate originals of the agreement on
the drainage project referenced above. It is requested that the City execute the
originals and return both originals to this office. Harris County will then execute the
agreement and one fully executed original will be sent to the City.
In reference to the project please be advised of the following:
1. An identical agreement was sent to the City of Shoreacres. City of Shoreacres
will fund $100,000.00 toward the project cost. The City has already executed
the agreement and returned it to the County for execution.
2. Harris County at a later date will provide documentation of the executed
agreement and a copy of the check from the City of Shoreacres.
3. Upon execution of the agreement from the two cities, Harris County will
advertise for bids. A copy of the bid tabulation will be sent to each city along
with an invitation to attend the pre. construction meeting with the contractor.
Trusting that I have answered your questions, your immediate attention to the
execution of the agreement would be appreciated.
RLC/ic
Attachments
cc: Elmo Wright, Pet. 2
Jackie 1. Freeman, HCPID
Central File
\\h.cedadmn~s\users\ta's\isabel\word\pct2\O 1-07.99 .003.doc
e
HARRIS COUNTY
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
e
1001 Preston Avenue
Seventh Floor
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 755-5370
2 June 1999
I
" .
... . . .
'J'r. ....-: .-. ;-'"
Mr. Robert Herrera
City Manager
City of LaPorte
604 West Fairmont Pkwy.
LaPorte, TX 77572-1115
~ 4.-.~~
~\~ ~ -goJq<;'
-j;; yY1 {}
cj;)--
SUBJECT: Agreement
Sunrise Drive Drainage Improvements
Dear Mr. Herrera:
Transmitted is an executed original agreement on the road project referenced above.
Per Item I. of the agreement, please submit a check payable to Harris County
Treasurer in an amount of $100,000 to this office. Enclosed is the bid tabulation.
Your immediate attention to the subject matter will be appreciated.
RLClic
Attachments as Noted
cc: Elmo Wright, Pet. 2
Central File
\\hcedadmn~s\users\ta's\isabel\word\pct2\06.02.99 .002 .doc
e
e
AGREEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS ~
~
COUNTY OF HARRIS ~
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between Harris County, a body corporate and
politic under the laws of the State of Texas, hereinafter called "County," and the City of LaPorte,
a city under the laws of the State of Texas, hereinafter called "City."
RECITALS:
The County intends to advertise for a construction contract (the "Contract"), pursuant to the
County Purchasing Act, to construct drainage improvements to serve Sunrise Drive from
Fairfield Avenue to Harris County Flood Control District Unit A 104-10-00 in Precinct 2..
It is to the mutual benefit of County and City to include within the Contract improvements
benefiting the City (the "Project").
The County is willing to award the Contract including the Project provided that City will provide
$100,000 toward the cost of the Project.
The parties agree as follows:
1. Within thirty (30) days after execution of this Agreement, the City shall deliver to the
County a check for $100,000.00.
2. Upon receipt and tabulation of the bids and determination of the lowest and best bid, the
County shall award the Contract, which shall include the Project, to the lowest and best bidder in
accordance with the usual and customary procedures of the County. It is expressly agreed and
understood that the County reserves the right to reject all bids. In such event, the County, in its
discretion, may either re-advertise for bids as in the first instance, pursuant to the same
understanding with regard to rejection of bids, or terminate this agreement as hereinafter
provided.
3. The County shall be responsible for administering the Contract. During the construction
of the Project, City shall have the right of access to the construction site and shall have the right
to review all documents, maps, plats, records, photographs, reports or drawings affecting said
construction, provided, however, City shall give notice by telephone to the County Engineer
prior to any inspection of either the site or documents and provided further that in conducting
said inspections, City shall not interfere with the work in progress.
e
e
4. The County may make such changes and amendments to the drawings and specifications
within the general scope of the approved Project as the County deems necessary or desirable
during construction of the Project so long as the original scope and intent of the Project is
unchanged.
5. Either party may terminate this Agreement, without cause, at any time prior to the
approval of the Contract, by written notice to the other party, and neither shall have any further
obligation hereunder, except that the County shall promptly return to City the unexpended funds
paid to the County hereunder by City with any earnings received thereon.
6. It is expressly understood and agreed that County has available the sum certified as
available hereunder by the County Auditor to satisfy its obligations under this Agreement and the
County shall not be obligated to expend more than the maximum sum.
7. The City or its authorized representatives shall have the right to review and audit all
books, records, vouchers and documents of whatever nature related to County's performance
under this Agreement during the period of performance of this agreement and for three (3) years
thereafter or for so long as there exists any dispute or litigation arising from this agreement.
8. No party hereto shall make, in whole or in part, any assignment of this agreement or any
obligation hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party hereto.
9. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the rights
herein granted and the obligations herein assumed. Any modifications concerning this
instrument shall be of no force and effect excepting a subsequent modification in writing, signed
by all parties hereto.
IN TESTIMONY OF WHICH, this agreement, in duplicate counterparts, each having
equal force and effect of an original, has been executed on behalf of the parties hereto as follows,
to-wit:
a. It has on \h:tScR..day of ~~ ,1999, been executed on
behalf of the County by the County udge of Hams County, Texas,
pursuant to an order of the Commissioners Court of Harris County
authorizing such execution.
b. It has on the L day of ~ 'Tut(/I" 1999, been executed on
behalf of City by its Mayor attested by its ity Secretary, pursuant to an
ordinance of its City Council authorizing such execution.
2
e
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MICHAEL P. FLEMING
County Attorney
BY&'h7~.J
ohn M. Renfrow
Assistant County Attorney
ATTEST
e
HARRIS COUNTY
CITY OF LAPORTE
BY~~;P~
Ma or
AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that funds are available in the amount of $894,000.00 to accomplish
and pay the obligations of Harris County herein.
3
e
e
ORDER AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN HARRIS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF LAPORTE
FOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SUNRISE DRIVE
THE STATE OF TEXAS ~
~
COUNTY OF HARRIS ~
On this the '2--~ day of yt r~
, 1999, the Commissioners Court of
Harris ~unty, Texas, sitting as the governing body ~rris County, upon motion of Commissioner
btll-'()d..t- , seconded by COmmiSSioner~~/A.v , duly put and carried,
IT IS ORDERED that County Judge be, and he is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf
of Harris County, an Agreement by and between Harris County and the City of LaPorte to construct
drainage improvements to serve Sunrise Drive, said Agreement being incorporated herein by reference
for all purposes as though fully set forth word for word.
. eourt
tad to commissioners
Presen
FEB 231999
APPRove
Recorded Vol_page_
e e
J.A. Costanza &. Associates Engineering, Inc.
4301 Center St.
Deer Park, Texas 77536 281-930-933~)
Consulting Engineers Fax 281-930-811 0
May 3, 1999
Mr. Arthur Storey, Jr., P.E.
County Engineer
Harris County Public Infrastructure Department
1001 Preston, 7th Floor ·
Houston, TX 77002-1893
Attn.: Mr. Frank Ma, P.E.
Re.: Sunrise Drive
PIN B102/0495/001
Bid Tabulations
JAC 97017
Dear Mr. Ma,
Find attached the Sunrise Drive project Bid Tabulation. The apparent low bidder
is Angel Brothers Ent., Inc. with a $830,686.44 bid.
The apparent low bidder, Angel Brothers Ent., Inc. appears to have no
discretions in there bid. All other discretions with respect to the various bidders
have been detailed and a summary of these errors by bidder is attached.
The apparent low bidder, Angel Brothers Ent., Inc. appears to be a competent
contractor. We recommend the contract be awarded to Angel Brothers Ent.,
Inc.
If you have any questions please call.
Very truly yours,
J.A. COSTANZA & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.
'.0.... ~~ ~ €.
~. Costanza, P.IE.O
attachments
1
e
--
BID TABULATION
FOR
SUNRISE DRIVE
FROM H.C.F.C.D. UNIT A1 04-1 0-00 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
PAGE NO.
1 ANGEL BROTHERS ENT., INC. ****************.********************...***********, 1-4
2 J.T.B. SERVICES, INC. *.***************************.******..*************, 1-4
3 RAMOS INDUSTRIES, INC. ******************************************.....***., 1-4
4 JIMERSON UNDERGROUND, INC. **************...*************************.****.*.*, 1-4
5 HUBCO, INC. .***************************************.*.********, 5-8
6 CONRAD CONSTRUCTION, INC. ***************************************************, 5-8
7 WHITELAK, INC. ***************************************************, 5-8
8 TEXAS-STERLING CONSTRUCTION *****.*.****.**.*.************************...**.***, 5-8
9 WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC **************************************...***..*****, 9-12
10 BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. .*.*.**************************..*.*.************.., 9-12
11 PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES, INC. ***********************************..**.***********, 9-12
12 COLT UTILITIES, INC. *********....******.********.******..**************, 9-12
13 CALCO CONTRACTING,INC. .**....***....*****************.****...**.*.*******, 13-16
14 RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS. INC. *******************************************.*******, 13-16
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUNT .HO\MII. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHO\MIIIN PARENTHESES
e
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT.. INC J.T.B. SERVICES. INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES. INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND INC.
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
8 Place and T esl 6-inch Welded Steel Wale. Line LF 36 S 100.00 S 3.600.00 S 98.00 S 3,528.00 S 100.00 S 3,600.00 S 129.00 S 4,644.00
Including Appurtenances as per Plans,
Min. Wall Thickness 0.280", Comolele
9 Place and Test6-lnch P.V.C., C-900, Waif r LF 74 S 40.00 S 2,960.00 S 14.00 S 1,036.00 S 61.00 S 4,514.00 S 103.00 S 7,622.00
Line Including Appurtenances as oer Plan:
10 Remove and Dipose Water Line Supply P 18, LF 99 S 1.00 S 99.00 S 12.00 S 1,188.00 S 6.00 S 594.00 S 9.00 S 891.00
All Sizes, Complele in Place
11 Place and Test6.inch P.V.C.. SDR-26, LF 21 S 45.00 S 945.00 S 25.00 S 525.00 S 33.00 S 693.00 S 151.00 S 3,171.00
Sanitary Sewer Pipe, Comolete In Place
12 Place and TestS-inch P.V.C., SDR-26, LF 499 S 65.00 S 32,435.00 S 29.00 S 14,471.00 S 47.00 S 23,453.00 S 68.00 S 33,932.00
Sanitary Sewer Pipe, Complete in Place
13 Place and Test Sanitary Sewer Manhole EACH 1 S 2,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 1,700.00 S 1,700.00 S 1,500.00 S 1.500.00 S 1,400.00 S 1 ,400.00
Complete in Place for
14 Remove and Dispose Sanitary Sewer EACH 1 S 300.00 S 300.00 S 1,000.00 S 1,000.00 S 350.00 S 350.00 S 800.00 S 800.00
Manhole, Complete In Place for
15 Remove and Dispose &-inch Sanllary S8'o\!r LF 18 S 5.00 S 90.00 S 14.00 S 252.00 S 8.00 S 144.00 S 9.00 S 162.00
Lead, Comjllete in Place for
16 Remove end Dipose 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 499 S 2.00 S 99B.OO S 16.00 S 7,984.00 S 6.00 S 2,994.00 S 9.00 S 4,491.00
Pipe. Complete in Place
Page1
of
16
e
3
4'
'5
6
'7
SECTiON
i'fEM
NO.
'1
2
SITE PREPARATION AND EAI'l'fllWORI
SEI
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT. INC J.T.B. SERVICES INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES, INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND, INC.
i
-
UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
SY 146 S 15.00 S 2,190.00 S 11.00 S 1,606.00 S 7.00 S 1,022.00 S 28.00 S 4,D88.0!l
, SY 3,840 S 1.00 S . 3,840.00 S 6.50 S 24,960.00 S 2.00 S 7,680.00 S 6.00 S 23,040.00
LF 910 S 7.00 S 6,370.00 S 10.00 S 9,100.00 S 8.00 S 7,280.00 S 9.00 S 8,190.00
SY 44 S 11.00 S 484.00 S 8.00 S 352.00 S 7.00 S 308.00 S 28.00 S 1,232.00
LS 1 S 500.00 S 500.00 S 1.800.00 S 1,800.00 S 8,600.00 S 8,600.00 S 2,200.00 S 2,200.00
.18
LF 1,228 S 5.00 S 6,140.00 S 5.00 S 6,140.00 S 4.00 S 4,912.00 S 6.00 S 7,368.00
LF 1,000 S 16.00 S 16,000.00 S 20.00 S 20,000.00 S 16.00 S 16,000.00 S 16.00 S 16,000.00
.TION1 S 35,524.00 S 63.958.00 S 45,802.00 S 62,118.00
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.C.D. UNIT A104-10-40 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
e
.e
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMEI'lT. CORRECTED AMOUN'J SHOVlIN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT. INC. J.T.B. SERVICES INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES, INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND INC.
SECTION 4 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT diD TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
23 lS-inch R.C.P., C-76. CI. III, Slorm Sewer LF 26 $ 45.00 $ 1,170.00 $ 30.00 5 780.00 $ 61.00 $ 1,586.00 ! S 50.00 $ 1,300.00
ComDlele In Place for 1.$1,080.001
24 24-lnch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Slorm Sewer LF 375 $ 54.00 $ 20,250.00 $ 38.80 $ 14,550.00 $ 57.00 $ 21,375.00 $ 57.00 $ 21,375.00
Comolele in Place for
25 3O-inch R.C.P.. C-76, CI. III, Slorm Sewer LF 44 $ 65.00 $ 2,860.00 $ 40.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 70.00 $ 3,080.00 $ 68.00 $ 2,992.00
ComDlele In Place for
26 42-inch R.C.P., C-76. CI. III, Slorm Sewel. LF 40 $ 107.00 $ 4,280.00 $ 86.50 $ 3,460.00 $ 97.00 $ 3,880.00 $ 111.00 $ 4,440.00
ComDlele in Place for
27 48-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Slorm Sewer. LF 117 $ 125.00 $ 14,625.00 $ 97.00 $ 11,349.00 $ 150.00 $ 17,550.00 $ 131.00 $ 15,327.00
ComDlele in Place for
28 4'x4' R.C.B"CB50, Slorm Sewer,incIudlng LF 268 $ 140.00 $ 37,520.00 $ 164 00 $ 43,952.00 $ 161.00 $ 43,148.00 $ 154.00 $ 41,272.00
Reducers and TranslUons,ComDlele in PI.JC8
29 5'x4' R.C.B.,CB50, Slorm Sewer,includi~ LF 775 $ 180.00 $ 139,500.00 $ 206.00 $ 159,650.00 $ 210.00 $ 162,750.00 $ 196.00 $ 151,900.00
Reducers and Transilions.ComDlete In Place
30 6'x4' R.C.B., CB50, Storm Sewer, LF 1.529 $ 210.00 $ 321.090.00 $ 231.00 $ 353,199.00 $ 266.00 $ 406,714.00 $ 229.00 $ 350,141.00
ComDlete in Place lor
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT., INC. J.T.B. SERVICES, INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES. INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND, INC.
SECTION 3 - STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVEI TION
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
21 Hydro-Mulch Seeding, Complete for ACRE 0.4 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,375.00 $ 950.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 690.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 1,080.00
22 Block Sodding, Complete for SY 320 $ 3.75 $ 1,200.00 $ 3.20 $ 1,024.00 $ 4.60 $ 1,472.00 $ 3.00 $ 960.00
TOTAL COST - SE :TION 3 S 2,200.00 S 1,974.00 S 2,182.00 S 2,040.00
I (1) I (2) I (3) I (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT. INC J.T.B. SERVICES, INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND INC.
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
17 Remove and Relay Existing 12" R.C.P. LF 36 $ 35.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 38.00 $ 1,368.00 $ 12.00 $ 432.00 IS 42.00 $ 1,512.00
ComDlete In Place for
18 Sanitary Sewer Bypass Pumping LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 5.200.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,600.00
ComDlete In Place for
19 Trench Safety System (5'.10'), All Widths LF 333 $ 2.00 $ 666.00 $ 1.00 $ 333.00 $ 1.00 $ 333.00 $ 1.00 $ 333.00
ComDlete In Place lor
20 Trench Safely System (5'-10'), All Widths LF 292 $ 2.00 $ 584.00 $ 1.50 $ 438.00 $ 1.00 $ 292.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,460.00
ComDlete In Place for
TOTAL COST. SEe TION 2 S 47,437.00 S 41,823.00 S 44.099.00 S 63,018.00
Page2 or
16
SUNRISE DRIVE
FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10~0 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
e
e
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT CORRECTED AMOUNl SHOWN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTliESES.
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT" INC. J.T.B. SERVICES, INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND INC.
SECTION 5 - PAVING
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
46 Base Repair with 8" Hot Mix Aspt18lic TON 297 S 65.00 S 19,305.00 6000 17,820.00 S 52.00 S 15.444.00 $ 52.00 S 15,444.00
Concrete Base Course, Comolete in Plac3
47 2" Hol Mixed Asphalic Concrele. Type "0 TON 691 S 45.00 S 31,095.00 51.00 35.241.00 $ 60.00 S 41,460.00 S 46.00 S 31,786.00
Comolete in Place for
33
32
SECTION 4
ITEM
NO.
31
35
34
40
37
36
39
3B
44
42
41
43
45
DESCRIPTION
Class "0" Concrete Seal Slab.
Complete In Place for
Storm Sewer Manhole (24"-42"), per H.C.
470-2, Complete In Place for
Storm Sewer Manhole (48".72"), per H.C.
470-2, Complete in Place for
Storm Sewer Manhole on Existing R.C.P.
(24"-42"), Complete in Place for
Storm Sewer Manhole on R.C.B.. Per H.C
470-2, Complete in Place for
Type "A" Inlet, Modified,
Complete in Place for
Type "A" wnh Concrete Apron
Complete in Place for
Roadside Ditch Interceptor Structure, per
Plans, Complete In Place for
Special Storm Junction Box. per Plans
Complete in Place for
Precast 3D-inch Safety End Trealment,
3:1, Complete in Placa for
Precast 30-inch Safety End Treatment,
3:1, Complete in Place for
lfHnch Reinforced Concrele Collar,
Complete In Place for
8-lnch Thick. 39 Inch Brick Wall Plug,
Complete in Place for
Broken Concrete Rip-Rap with 1-t.ayer
Trevira 1125, Geotextile Fabric if Approve
Equal, Complete in Place for
Trench Safety System. (5'.10'), All Widths
Complete in Place for
TOT AI.. COST.. SE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
(1) (2) (3) (4)
- ANGEL BROTHERS ENT., INC. J.T.B. SERVICES. INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES. INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND, INC.
-
UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
- SV 1,500 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 $ 17.00 S 25,500 00 S 17.00 S 25.500.00
- 1'$25,000.00
EACH 1 S 1,600.00 S 1,600.00 S 1.ISO.00 $ 1,ISO.00 S 1,200.00 S 1,200.00 S 1,400.00 S 1,400.00
- EACH 2 S 1,600.00 S 3,200.00 S 1,7SO.00 S 3,500.00 $ 1,200.00 S 2,400.00 S 2,200.00 S 4,400.00
- EACH 4 S 1,700.00 S 6.800.00 S 1,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 1,450.00 S 5,800.00 S 1,600.00 S 6,400.00
- EACH 16 S 800.00 S 12,800.00 S 610.00 S 9,760.00 S 700.00 S 11,200.00 S 1,400.00 S 22,400.00
- EACH 3 S 1,300.00 S 3,900.00 $ 920.00 S 2,760.00 S 1,350.00 S 4,OSO.00 S 1,200.00 $ 3,600.00
- EACH 5 $ 2.000.00 $ 10.000.00 S 897.00 S 4,485.00 S 1,850.00 S 9,250.00 S 2,400.00 S 12,000.00
. EACH 2 S 2,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 2,410.00 S 4,820.00 S 936.00 S 1,872.00 S 3,200.00 $ 6,400.00
. EACH 9 $ 2,100.00 S 18,900.00 S 1,720.00 S 15,480.00 S 935.00 S 8,415.00 S 2,400.00 S 21,600.00
EACH 24 S 750.00 S 18,000.00 S 780.00 S 18,720.00 S 245.00 S 5,880.00 S 800.00 S 19.200.00
EACH 4 S 900.00 S 3.600.00 S 860.00 S 3,440.00 S 290.00 S 1,160.00 S 900.00 S 3,600.00
EACH 2 S 1 SO.OO S 300.00 S 100.00 $ 200.00 S 680.00 S 1,360.00 S 800.00 S 1,600.00
EACH 16 S 250.00 $ 4,000.00 S 200.00 S 3,200.00 S 2SO.00 S 4.000.00 S 500.00 S 8.000 00
("514,400.00)
S'l'" 80 S 48.00 S 3.840.00 S 40.00 $ 3,200.00 S 3B.5O S 3,080.00 S SO.OO $ 4,000.00
I
LF 3.201 S 1.00 $ 3,201.00 S 2.00 S 6,402.00 S 1.00 S 3,201.00 S 1.00 S 3,201.00
::T10N 4 S 660.936.00 S 695,317.00 S 748,451.00 $ 732,048.00
- ("$738,44B.00l
Page3 of
16
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104.10.QO to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
TOTAL CONSTRUCTCf)N COST' 0 SUNRISE DRIVE $ 830,686.M
DENOll:S ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT, CORRECTED AMOUN" SHOWN, INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENlliESES.
891,596.04
(*$891,896.04)
931,261.84
(*$930,761.84)
948,265.85
(*$954,665.85)
Page4 d
16
e
$
(1) (2) (3) (4)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT., INC. J.T.B. SERVICES INC. RAMOS INDUSTRIES INC. JIMERSON UNDERGROUND INC.
SECTION 6 - TRAFFIC SIGNS AND TRAFFIC MARl ERS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
52 Place, Maintain and Remove Projed Slgr l, EACH 3 $ 600.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 900.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 700.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 700.00 $ 2,100.00
Harris County, Complete In Placa far
53 Trallic Handling and Control during LS 1 $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 11,500.00 $ 11,500.00
Construction Including Signs, Barricades
and Channelizing Devices, Complete In F'lace
54 White Relectorized Solid Pavement Mark ngs SF 1,891.7 $ 0.55 $ 1,040.44 $ 1.20 $ 2.270.04 $ 0.55 $ 1,040.44 $ 0.50 $ 945.85
Widths as oar Plans, Comolete In Place
TOTAL COST. Sf CTION 6 $ 11,340.44 S 14,570.04 $ 13,140.44 S 14,545.85
$
$
51
50
e
49
DESCRIPTION
Prime Coat. MC-3D
Complete In Place for
Tack Coal
Complete in Place for
Milling Asphalt Concrete Pavement, 2-lnc I,
Complete In Place lor _
6" Thick Reinforced Concrete Driveways,
Com..E!ete in Place lor _
TOTAL COST. SE :T10N 5
SY
138
SY
4,092
GAL
310
I
i
i
i
$
73,249.00
73,954.00
s
77,607.40
40.00
I
5,520.00
42.00
5,796.00
J
32.00
$
4,416.00
4.00
$
16,368.00
3.00
12,276.00
$
3.45
$
14,117.40
2.50
J
775.00
1.00
310.00
J
1.00
I
310.00
$
i
i
i
s
74,496.00
6~.00
$
8,418.00
4.00
$
16,368.00
1.00
2.iiii
$
i
TOTAL BID
1,860.00
620.00
SECTION 5
ii'EM
NO.
4ii
PAVING
UNIT
GAL
BID QUANT.
t860
1
UNIT BID
0.10
(1)
ANGEL BROTHERS ENT., INC.
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.C.D. UNIT A104-10-GO to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
$
TOTAL BID
186.00
I
UNIT BID
"u5
(2)
J.T.B. SERVICES, INC.
TOTAL BID
2,511.00
1
$
UNIT BID
1.00
(3)
RAMOS INDUSTRIES~ INC.
I
TOTAL BID
,860.00
I
UNIT BID
(4)
JIMERSON UNDERGROUND, INC.
e
e
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT, CORRECTED AMOUNT lHOWN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTliESES.
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO. INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERLING CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
8 Place and Test6-inch Walded Steel W: ter Line LF 36 $ 67.00 $ 2,412.00 $ 204.92 $ 7,377.12 $ 150.00 $ 5.400.00 $ 150.00 $ 5,400.00
Including Appurtenances as per Plans,
Min. Wall Thickness 0.280", Complete
9 Place and Test6-lnch P.V.C., C-900, Vo ater LF 74 $ 39.00 $ 2,886.00 $ 83.94 $ 6,211.56 $ 60.00 $ 4.440.00 $ 50.00 $ 3,700.00
LIne Includina Aoourtenances as oer Pi IllS
10 Remove and Dipose Water Line Supp~ Pipe, LF 99 $ 11.25 $ 1,113.75 $ 7.00 $ 693.00 $ 10.00 $ 990.00 $ 6.00 $ 594.00
All Sizes, Comolete in Place
11 Place and Te!tt6-lnch P.V.C.. SDR-26 LF 21 $ 35.00 $ 735.00 $ 67.30 $ 1,413.30 $ 75.00 $ 1,575.00 $ 65.00 $ 1.365.00
Sanitary Sewer Pipe, Complete In PllIO'
12 Place and Test8-lnch P.V,C., SDR-26, LF 499 $ 22.00 $ 10,978.00 $ 68.28 $ 34,071.72 $ 90.00 $ 44,910.00 S 90.00 $ 44,910.00
Sanitary Sewer Pioe. Comolete In PisCo
13 Place and Test Sanitary Sewer Manhol.. EACH 1 5 1,40000 5 1,400 00 5 1,971.04 $ 1,971.04 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
Comolete in Place for
14 Remove and Dispose Sanitary Sewer EACH 1 $ 750.00 S 750.00 $ 400.00 S 400.00 $ 1,000.00 S 1,000.00 S 900.00 $ 900.00
Manhole. Comolete in Place for
15 Remove and Dispose 6-inch Sanitary S _ LF 18 $ 20.00 S 360.00 S 7.00 $ 126.00 S 25.00 $ 450.00 $ 17.00 S 306.00
Lead. Como!ete in Place for
16 Remove and Dipose 8-inch Sanitary Sf Ner LF 499 $ 12.00 S 5,988.00 $ 7.00 $ 3,493.00 $ 10.00 $ 4.990.00 $ 6.00 S 2,994.00
Ploe. Comolete in Place
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERLING CONSTRUCTION
SECTION I. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWf RK
ITEM
NO. UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
1 lie SY 146 S 11.00 $ 1,606.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,460.00 $ 5.00 $ 730.00 $ 10.00 $ 1,460.00
2 Ite SY 3,840 S 3.25 $ 12,480.00 $ 5.00 S 19,200.00 S 3.00 $ 11,520.00 $ 4.00 $ 15.360.00
Il)
3 lie LF 910 $ 14.50 S 13,195.00 $ 8.00 S 7,280.00 $ 10.00 $ 9.100.00 $ 8.00 S 7,280.00
4 !Ie SY 44 $ 15.00 $ 660.00 $ 15.00 $ 660.00 $ 20.00 S 880.00 $ 15.00 S 660.00
5 1d LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1.500.00 $ 1.500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 S 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
tams
6 LF 1,228 S 4.50 S 5,526.00 S 4.00 $ 4,912.00 $ 6.00 S 7,368.00 S 4.00 $ 4,912.00
7 LF 1,000 S 16.00 $ 16,000.00 S 16.00 S 16,000.00 $ 16.00 $ 16,000.00 S 16.00 $ 16,000.00
EeTION 1 $ SO,967.00 $ 51,012_00 $ 46,598.00 S 47,672.00
SUNRISE DRIVE
BID TABULATION FOR
FROM H.C.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10-00 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
PageS of
16
e
DENOteS ERRDR IN BID DOCUMENT, CORRECT1:0 AMOUNl SHOWN, INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO, INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERLING CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 4 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
23 18-lnch R.C.P., C.76, CI. III, Storm Swer, LF 26 S 50.00 S 1,300.00 S 63.68 S 1,655.68 S 50.00 S 1,300.00 S 70.00 S 1,820.00
Complete In Place for
24 24-lnch R.C.P.. C-76. CI. III, Storm Sev sr, LF 375 S 66.00 S 24.750.00 S 68.11 S 25.541.25 S 60.00 S 22,500.00 S 75.00 S 28.125.00
Complete in Place for
25 3D-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III. Storm Sev er, LF 44 S 75.00 S 3,300.00 S 78.56 S 3,456.64 S 80.00 S 3,520.00 S 110.00 S 4,640.00
Complete in Place for
26 42-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III. Storm Sev er, LF 40 S 134.00 S 5,360.00 S 99.98 5 3,999.20 S 100.00 $ 4.000.00 S 12500 5 5.000.00
Complete in Place for
27 48-lnch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Storm Sev er, LF 117 S 139.00 S 16.263.00 S 113.91 S 13.327.47 S 130.00 S 15,210.00 S 140.00 S 16,380.00
Complete In Place for
28 4'x4' R.C.B.,C85O, Storm Sewer.inclucl.'l!I LF 268 S 152.00 S 40,736.00 S 139.34 S 37,343.12 S 175.00 S 46,900.00 S 180.00 S 48.240.00
Reducers and Transitions,Complete In Place
29 5'x4' R.C.B.,C850, Storm Sewer,includ ng LF 775 S 203.00 S 157,325.00 S 180.19 S 139,647.25 S 200.00 S 155,000.00 S 219.00 S 169,725.00
Reducers and Transitions, Complete In Place
30 6'x4' R.C.B., C85O, Storm Sewer. LF 1,529 S 247.00 S 377,663.00 S 217.11 S 331,961.19 S 240.00 S 366,960.00 I S 224.00 S 342,496.00
Complete In Place for
Page6 of
16
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STE"LING CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 3 - STORM WATER POLLUTION PRE' ENTION
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
21 Hydro-Mulch Seeding. Complete for ACRE 0.4 S 1,900.00 S 760.00 S 2,500.00 S 1,000.00 S 5,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 1,700.00 S 680.00
22 Block Sodding, Complete for SY 320 S 2.75 S 880.00 S 5.00 S 1,600.00 S 5.00 S 1,600.00 S 2.50 S 800.00
TOTAL COST. ! ECTlON 3 $ 1,640.00 $ 2,600.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 1,480.00
e
I (5) (6) (7) I (8)
HUBCO INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERUNG CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
17 Remove end Relay Existing 12" R.C.P. LF 36 S 40.00 S 1,440.00 S 40.00 S 1,440.00 S 10.00 S 360.00 S 16.00 S 576.00
Complete In Place for
18 Sanitary Sewer Bypass Pumping LS 1 S 3,000.00 S 3,000.00 S 5.000.00 S 5,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 500.00 S 500.00
ComDlete in Place for
19 Trench Safety System (5'-10'). All Widtll LF 333 S 0.75 S 249.75 S 3.00 S 999.00 S 5.00 S 1,665.00 $ 1.00 S 333.00
Complete In Place for
20 Trench Safety System (5'-10'), All WidU 3 LF 292 S 1.00 S 292.00 S 5.00 S 1,460.00 S 10.00 S 2.920.00 S 1.00 S 292.00
ComDlete in Place for
TOTAL COST. f cCTION 2 $ 31.604.50 $ 64,655.74 $ 73,200.00 $ 68.870.00
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.C.D. UNIT A104-10-o0 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
.
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUNT SHOWN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTl-lESES.
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO, INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK, INC. TEXAS-STERLING CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 5 - PAVING
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
46 Base Repeir with 8" Hot Mix Asphalic TON 297 S 61.00 S 18,117.00 S 42.00 S 12,474.00 S SO.OO S 14.850.00 S 75.00 S 22,275.00
Concrete Base Course. Complete in PI.lce
47 2" Hot Mixed Asphalic Concrele, Type' D" TON 691 S 38.00 S 26,258.00 S 41.44 S 28,635.04 S SO.OO S 34.550.00 S 42.00 S 29,022.00
Complete in Place for
Page7 of
16
e
e
(5) (6) (7) (8)
HUBCO INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERUNG CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 4 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
31 Class ''0'' Concrete Seal Slab., SY 1,500 S 20.00 S 30.000.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00
Complete in Place for
32 Storm Sewer Manhole (24"-42"). per H.I.. EACH 1 S 2,000.00 S 2.000.00 S 1,500.00 S 1,500.00 S 2,000.00 S 2.000.00 S 2,000.00 S 2,000.00
470-2, Comolete In Place for
33 Storm Sewer Manhole (48"-72"), per H.t '. EACH 2 S 2,700.00 S 5,400.00 S 2,000.00 S 4.000.00 S 2,500.00 S 5,000.00 S 2,500.00 S 5,000.00.
470-2. Complete in Place for
34 Storm Sewer Manhole on Existing R.C.!'. EACH 4 S 2.200.00 S 8.800.00 S 1,700.00 S 6.800.00 S 2,500.00 S 10,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 8,000.00
24"-42"1, Complete in Place for
35 Storm Sewer Manhole on R.C.B., Per H C. EACH 16 S 1.000.00 S 16,000.00 S 1,000.00 S 16,000.00 S 800.00 S 12,800.00 S 1,300.00 S 20,800.00
470-2. Comolete in Place for
36 Type "A" Inlet, Modified, EACH 3 S 1,300.00 S 3.900.00 S 1,240.41 S 3,721.23 S 1,500.00 S 4.500.00 S 1,500.00 S 4,500.00
Complete in Place for
37 Type "A" with Concrete Apron EACH 5 S 1,850.00 S 9.2SO.00 S 2,003.68 S 10,018.40 S 2,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 10,000.00
Comolete in Place for '.
38 Roadside Dllch Interceptor Structure, PI'!' EACH 2 S 1,600.00 S 3,200.00 S 2,003.68 S 4,007.36 S 2,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 4,000.00
Plans, Complete In Piece for
39 Special Storm Junction Box, per Plans EACH 9 S 1.500.00 S 13,500.00 S 1,940.41 S 17,463.69 S 2,500.00 S 22,500.00 S 1.200.00 S 10,800.00
Comolete in Place for
40 Precast 30-Inch Safety End Trealment, EACH 24 S 825.00 S 19,800.00 S 1,064.00 S 25,536.00 S 500.00 S 12,000.00 S 750.00 S 18,000.00
3:1. Comolete in Place for
41 Precast 3O-inch Safety End Treatment, EACH 4 S 1.000.00 S 4,000.00 S 1,316.00 S 5,264.00 S 1,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 900.00 S 3,600.00
3:1, Complete in Place for
42 1B-inch Reinforced Concrete Collar. EACH 2 S 200.00 S 400.00 S 500.00 S 1,000.00 S 2SO.00 S 500.00 S 500.00 S 1,000.00
Comolete In Place for
43 B-Inch Thick - 39 inch Brick Wall Plug, EACH 16 S 200.00 S 3,200.00 S 2SO.oo S 4,000.00 S 200.00 S 3,200.00 S 300.00 S 4,800.00
Complete in Place for
44 Broken Concrete Rip-Rap with 1-Layer SY 80 S 70.00 S 5,600.00 S SO.OO S 4,000.00 S 100.00 1$ 8,000.00 S 36.00 S 2,880.00
Trevira 1125, Geotextile Fabric if Apprc Jed
Eaual, Complete In Piece for
45 Trench Safety System, (5'-10'), All W1dllS, LF 3,201 S 1.00 S 3.201.00 S 1.00 S 3.201.00 S 5.00 S 16,005.00 S 1.00 S 3,201.00
Comolete in Place for
TOTAL COST - ! ECTION 4 S 754,948.00 S 688,943.48 S 755,395.00 S 740,707.00
SUNRISE DRIVE
FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10-40 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
TOTAl.. CONSTRUC' "ION COST - SUNRISE DRIVE $ 948,902.88
(*$948,902.87)
,
. DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMDUi'T SHO\MII. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES
966,338.70
(*$968,138.70)
PageS of
16
e
e
54
53
SECTION 6 - TRAFFIC SIGNS AND TRAFFIC MI
ITEM
NO.
52
SECTION 5
ITEM
NO.
48
51
so
49
DESCRIPTION
Prime Coat, MC-30
Complete In Place for
Tack Coat
Complete In Place for
:Milling Asphalt Concrete Pavement, 2-1
Com lete in Place for
6. Thick Reinforced Concrete Drivewa)
Complete in Place for
TOTAL. COST.:
PAVING
$
(5) (6) (7) (B)
HUBCO, INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. WHITELAK.INC. TEXAS-STERUNG CONSTRUCTION
r~KERS
UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
i ~ns, EACH 3 $ 725.00 $ 2,175.00 $ 616.00 $ 1.848.00 S 3.000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 700.00 $ 2,100.00
1"$3.600.001 '.$10.800.001
LS 1 $ 46.500.00 $ 46.500.00 $ 92,000.00 $ 92,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10.000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00
1'5,
11 Place
.rkings SF 1,891.7 $ 0.75 $ 1,418.78 $ O.SO $. 945.85 $ 1.00 $ 1,891.70 $ O.SO $ 945.85
, 1"$1,418.771
;ECTION 6 $ 5O,093.7B $ 94,793.85 $ 20,891.70 $ 43,045.85
("$50,093.77) (.S22,691.70)
BID TABULATION FOR
$
(5) (6) (7) (8)
- HUBCO, INC. CONRAD CONSTRUCTION CO INC. WHITELAK INC. TEXAS-STERUNG CONSTRUCTION
UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
GAL 1.860 $ 0.01 $ 18.60 $ 1.09 $ 2.027.40 $ 1.00 $ 1,860.00 $ 1.SO $ 2,790.00
GAL 310 $ 1.00 $ 310.00 $ 1.96 $ 607.60 $ 1.00 $ 310.00 $ 2.00 $ 620.00
oCh, SY 4,092 $ 2.00 $ 8,184.00 $ 2.81 $ 11,498.52 $ 2.00 $ 8,184.00 $ 2.00 $ 8,184.00
J, SY 138 $ 49.00 $ 6.762.00 $ 36.00 $ 4.958.00 $ SO.oo $ 6,900.00 $ SO.OO $ 6,900.00
(.$60,210.561
ECTION 5 $ 59,649.60 $ 60,210.56 $ 66,654.00 $ 69,791.00
962,215.63
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104.1D-OO to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
$
969,565.85
e
" DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUN"'
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
8 Place and TeslS-inch Welded Sleel Walt r Line LF 36 S 100.00 S 3,600.00 S 120.00 S 4,320.00 S 85.00 S 3,060.00 S 90.55 S 3,259.80
Including Appurtenances as per Plans,
Min. Wall Thickness 0.280", ComDlele
9 Place and TeslS-lnch P.V.C., C-900, Wa.lr LF,,' 74 S SO.OO S 3,700.00 S 100.00 S 7,400.00 S 30.00 S 2,220.00 S 42.68 S 3,158.32
Line Including Appurtenances as Der Plar I
10 Remove and Dipose Waler Line Supply F 'pe, LF 99 S 1.00 S 99.00 S 10.00 S 990.00 S 7.00 S 693.00 S 3.97 S 393.03
All Sizes, Complele in Place
11 Place and Tesl6-inch P.V.C.. SDR-26, LF 21 S 45.00 S 945.00 S SO.OO S I,OSO.OO S 42.00 S 882.00 S 118.52 S 2,488.92
Sanllary Sewer Pipe, ComDlete in Place
12 Place and TeslS-inch P.V.C., SDR-26, LF 499 S 80.00 S 39,920.00 S 55.00 S 27,445.00 S 63.00 S 31,437.00 S 76.73 S 38,288.27
Sanilary Sewsr Pipe, Complete in Place
13 Place and Test Sanitary Sewer Menhole EACH 1 IS 2,000.00 S 2.000.00 $ 1.200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,435.00 ~ 1,435.00 $ 3,969.18 S 3,989.16
ComDlete in Place lor
14 Remove and Dispose Sanilary Sewer EACH 1 S 500.00 S SOO.OO S 400.00 S 400.00 S 1SO.00 S lSO.00 S 2,902.90 S 2,902.90
Manhole, Complele in Place for
15 Remove and Dispose S-inch Sanilary Se' '8r LF 18 S 1.00 S 18.00 S 15.00 S 270.00 $ 5.00 S 90.00 S 31.04 $ 558.n
Lead. Complete in Place for
18 Remove and Dipose B-inch Sanitary SIM II" LF 499 S 1.00 S 499.00 S 10.00 $ 4,990.00 $ 5.00 S 2,495.00 S 8.71 S 4,346.29
Pipe. Complele in Place
SHOWN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
Page9 of
16
e
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION I. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWOR<
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT 810 TOTAL 810.
1 Remove and Dispose of Exisling Concrell SY 146 S 5.00 S 730.00 S 3.00 S 438.00 S 15.00 S 2,190.00 S 19.94 S 2,911.24
Driveways, Complele In place
2 Remove and Dispose of Existing Cancre.. SY .3,840 S 3.00 S 11,520.00 S 2.00 S 7,680.00 $ 4.00 S 15,360.00 S 5.02 S 19,276.80
Roadwavand BaselFor Storm Sewer Insll
3 Remove and Dispose of Existing Concret, LF 910 S 6.00 S 5,460.00 S 2.00 S 1,820.00 S 8.00 S 7,280.00 S 14.29 S 13,003.90
Pipe, All Sizes, Complele in place
4 Remove and Dispose of Existing Concret. SY 44 S 15.00 S 660.00 S 5.00 $ 220.00 $ 20.00 S 880.00 S 19.94 S 877.36
Slope Pavement. Complete in place
5 Remove and Relocate Existing Traffic anc LS 1 S 300.00 S 300.00 S 1,500.00 S 1,500.00 $ 1,100.00 S 1,100.00 S 1,500.00 S 1,500.00
Roadwav Sians, Includlna alllncldenlalltt l1S
6 Regrade Roadside Ditches, LF 1,228 S 8.00 S 9,824.00 S 5.00 S 6,140.00 S 6.00 S 7,368.00 S 3.35 S 4,113.80
Complete in Place
7 Well Pointing Syslem". LF 1,000 S 20.00 S 20,000.00 S 16.00 S 16,000.00 S 16.00 S 16,000.00 S 18.98 S 18,980.00
ComDlete In Place for
TOTAL COST - SEe .TION 1 S 48,494.00 S 33,798.00 S 50,178.00 $ 60,663.10
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10~O to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
e
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUW' SHOINN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOINN IN PARENniESES.
27
24
SECTION 4
ITEM
NO.
n
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 3 - STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVE mON
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
21 Hydro-Mulch Seeding, Complete for ACRE 0.4 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 S 800.00 $ 2,300.00 1$ 920.00 $ 2,352.47 $ 940.99
22 Block Sodding, Complete for SY 320 $ 3.00 $ 960.00 S 3.00 $ 960.00 $ 3.60 S 1.152.00 $ 3.30 S 1,056.00
TOTAl.. COST - SE. ;TION 3 S 1,960.00 S 1,760.00 S 2,072.00 $ 1,996.99
29
26
25
30
2B
DESCRIPTION
la-Inch R.C.P., C-76, CI.
Complete In Plate for
24.inch R.C.P., C-76. CI.
Complete In Plate for
3D-Inch R.C.P., C-76, CI.
Complete In Piece for
42-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI.
Complete In Plate for
48-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI.
Complete In Plate for
4'x4' R.C.B.,C850, Storm Sewer,lncludin!
Reducers and Transitions, Complete In P
5'x4' R.C.B.,C850, Storm Sewer,lncludinr
Reducars and Transitions,Complete in P
6'x4' R.C.B., C850, Storm Sewer,
Complete In Place for
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
Storm Sewe:
Storm Sewe.
Storm Sewel
Storm S8W8I
Storm Sewel
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID uflJrr BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BIO TOTAL BID
LF 26 $ 70.00 $ 1,820.00 $ 70.00 $ 1,820.00 S 55.00 $ 1,430.00 S 54.46 S 1,415.96
LF 375 $ 80.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 75.00 S 28,125.00 $ 63.00 $ 23,625.00 S 59.68 S 22,380.00
LF 44 $ 90.00 S 3,960.00 S 85.00 $ 3,740.00 $ 81.00 $ 3,564.00 S 68.93 S 3,032.92
LF 40 $ 135.00 $ 5,400.00 S 135.00 S 5,400.00 S 130.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 101.13 S 4,1l4!i.20
LF 117 S 150.00 S 17,550.00 $ 150.00 S 17,550.00 S 156.00 $ 18,252.00 $ 125.85 S 14,724.45
LF 268 S 180.00 $ 48,240.00 S 180.00 $ 48.240.00 S 190.00 $ 50,920.00 S 162.89 S 43,654.52
lte
LF 775 $ 215.00 $ 166,625.00 $ 230.00 S 178,250.00 $ 232.00 S 179,800.00 $ 197.17 $ 152,806.75
Ice
LF 1,529 $ 260.00 $ 397,540.00 $ 260.00 S 397,540.00 S 275.00 S 420,475.00 S 244.53 S 373,886.37
Page10 of
16
--
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES, INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
17 Remove and Relay Existing 12" R.C.P. LF 36 $ 50.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 26.00 $ 936.00 $ 27.00 $ 972.00 $ 71.66 $ 2,579.76
Complete in Place far
18 Sanitary Sewer Bypass Pumping LS 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 S 7,000.00 S 7.000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 S 5,000.00 S 5,000.00
Comolete in Place for
19 Trench Safety System (5'-10'), All Widths LF 333 $ 1.00 $ 333.00 $ 1.00 $ 333.00 $ 1.00 $ 333.00 S 2.23 S 742.59
Comolete in Place for
20 Trench Safaty System (5'-10'), All Widths LF 292 S 1.00 $ 292.00 $ 1.00 S 292.00 S 1.00 S 292.00 $ 2.23 S 651.16
Complete In Place far .
TOT AI.. COST. SEt TION 2 S 54,206.00 $ 56,626.00 S 50,059.00 S 68,338.92
SUNRISE DRIVE
FROM H.C.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10-40 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
BID TABULATION FOR
e
-
DENOTES ERROR IN 910 DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUN r SHOIMI, INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 4 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
31 Class "0" Concrete Seal Slab., SY 1.500 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 22.~ S 33,495.00
Complete in Place for
32 Storm Sewer Manhole (24"-42"). per H.C. EACH 1 S 1,800.00 S 1,800.00 S 1,200.00 S 1,200.00 S 1,065.00 S 1,065.00 S 2,927.46 S 2,927.46
470-2, Comolete in Place for
33 Storm Sewer Manhole (48"-72"), per H.C. EACH 2 S 2,300.00 S 4,600.00 S 1,500.00 S 3,000.00 S 2,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 4,812.12 S 9,624.24
470-2, Comolete In Place for
34 Storm Sewer Manhole on Existing R.C.P. EACH 4 S 1,200.00 S 4,800.00 S 1,000.00 S 4,000.00 S 1,065.00 S 4,260.00 S 2,104.60 S 8,418.40
24"-42''1, Comolete In Place for
35 Storm Sewer Manhole on R.C.B., Per H.C EACH 16 S 900.00 S 14,400.00 S 800.00 S 12,800.00 S 950.00 S 15,200.00 S 1,056.96 S 16,911.36
470-2, Comolete In Place for
36 Type "A" Inlet, Modified. EACH 3 S 1,100.00 S 3,300.00 S 1,200.00 S 3,600.00 S 960.00 S 2,880.00 $ 1,060.68 $ 3,182.04
Complete In Place for
37 Type "A" with Concrete Apron EACH 5 S 1,500.00 S 7,500.00 S 2,500.00 S 12.500.00 S 2,200.00 S 11,000.00 S 1,484.95 S 7,424.75
Comolete In Place for
38 Roadside Dhch Interceptor Structure, per EACH 2 S 1,500.00 S 3,000.00 S 4,200.00 S 8,400.00 S 2,200.00 S 4,400.00 $ 2,545.62 S 5,091.24
Plans, Comolete In Place for
39 Special Storm Junction Box, per Plans EACH 9 S 2.100.00 S 18,900.00 S 2,400.00 S 21,600.00 S 1,650.00 S 14.850.00 S 6,866.48 S 61,798.32
Comolete in Place for
40 Precast30-inch Safely End Treatment, EACH 24 S 600.00 S 14,409.00 S 650.00 S 15,600.00 S 750.00 S 1 B,ooo.OO S 815.05 S 19,561.20
3:1, Comolete In Place for
41 Precast30-inch Safely End Treatment, EACH 4 S BOO.OO S 3,200.00 S 850.00 S 3,400.00 S B75.00 S 3,500.00 S 1,119.29 S 4,477. 16
3:1, Comolete In Place for
42 IS-inch Reinforced Concrete Collar, EACH 2 S 300.00 S 600.00 S 300.00 S 600.00 S 300.00 S 800.00 S 279.13 S 558.26
Comolete in Place for
43 S-inch Thick - 39 inch Brick Wall Plug, EACH 16 S 60.00 S 960.00 S 400.00 S 6,400.00 S 85.00 S 1,360.00 $ 234.47 S 3,751.52
Complete in Place for
44 Broken Concrete Rip-Rap with I -Layer SY 80 S 80.00 S 6,400.00 S 50.00 S 4,000.00 S 45.00 S 3,600.00 S n.60 S 6,208.00
Trevira 1125, Geotexllle Fabric If ApproVI d
Eaual, ComDlete in Place for
45 Trench Safely System. (5'-10'1, All Width! LF 3,201 S 1.00 S 3,201.00 S 1.00 S 3,201.00 S 1.00 S 3,201.00 S 0.56 S 1,792.56
Comolete in Place for
TOT AI. COST - SEr;TION 4 783,696.00 S 806,466.00 S 816,682.00 S 801,167.68
(9) (101 (II) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES INC. COLT UTILITIES,INC.
SECTION 5 - PAVING
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
46 Base Repair with B" Hot Mix Asphalic TON 297 S 50.00 S 14,850.00 S 45.00 I S 13,365.00 S 55.00 S 16,335.00 $ 42.43 S 12,601.71
Concrete Base Course. ComDlete In Plar!
47 2" Hot Mixed Asphalic Concrete, Type "[:' , TON 691 $ 50.00 S 34,550.00 $ 50.00 $ 34,550.00 S 55.00 S 38.005.00 S 43.54 $ 30,086.14
Complete in Place for
Page11
of
16
BID TABULATION FOR
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10-o0 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
TOl At CONSTRUCTION ( OST . SUNRDSU:: DRDVu:: $ 977,519.85
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUN r SHOVlIN, INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOVlIN IN PARENTHESES.
Page12 of
16
e
e
$
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES,INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 6 - TRAFFIC SIGNS AND TRAFFIC MAR :ERS
ITEM
NO. UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BIO
52 s, EACH 3 S 1,000.00 S 3,000.00 S 850.00 S 2,550.00 $ 700.00 S 2,100.00 S 1.898.05 S 5,694.15
53 LS 1 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 16,999.38 S 16,999.38
. lace
54 ngs SF l,B91.7 S 0.50 S 945.B5 S 2.00 S 3,783.40 S 0.85 S 1,607.95 $ 0.78 S 1,475.53
;T10N 6 S 13,945.85 S 16,333.40 S 13,707.95 S 24,169.06
("$13,946.85)
BID TABULATION FOR
s
(9) (10) (11) (12)
WM. H. GRAY CONSTRUCTION CO, INC. BEARDEN CONTRACTING CO. PATE & PATE ENTERPRISES, INC. COLT UTILITIES INC.
SECTION 5 - PAVING
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
48 Prime Coa~ MC-3D GAL 1,860 $ 2.00 $ 3,720.00 S 2.00 $ 3,720.00 $ 2.40 S 4,464.00 $ 1.67 S 3,106.20
ComDlele In Place lor
49 Tack Coat GAL 310 S 1.00 S 310.00 S 1.00 S 310.00 S 1.20 S 372.00 $ 2.79 S 864.90
Comolete in Place for
50 Milling Asphalt Concrele Pavement, 2.jnt I, SY 4,092 $ 4.00 S 16.368.00 S 4.00 $ 16,368.00 $ 4.20 $ 17,186.40 S 3.35 S 13,708.20
ComDlele In Place for
51 6" Thick Reinforced Concrete Driveways, SY 138 $ 40.00 S 5,520.00 S 26.00 S 3,588.00 S 55.00 S 7,590.00 $ 48.57 S 6,702.66
ComDlete in Place for
TOTAL COST - SEI;TION 5 S 75,318.00 S 71,901.00 S 83,952.40 S 67,069.81
SUNRISE DRIVE
986,8M.40
FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10.o0 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
1,016,651.35
$
1,023,405.55
-
. DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT, CORRECTED AMOU~'T SHOWN, INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
16
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
~ 2 - UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS
- DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
Place and Test6-inch Welded Steel Water Line LF 36 $ 105.00 $ 3,780.00 $ 355.00 $ 12,780.00
Including Appurtenances as per Plans,
- Min. Wall Thickness 0.280", Comolete
Place and Test6-lnch P.V.C., C-9OO, Water LF 74 $ 31.00 $ 2,294.00 $ 125.00 $ 9,250.00
- Line Includino Aoourtenances es oer Plans
Remove and Dipose Water Line Supply Pipe, LF 99 $ 26.00 $ 2,574.00 $ 25.00 $ 2,475.00
- All Sizes, ComDlete In Place
Place and Test 6-inch P.V.C., SDR-26, LF 21 $ 77.00 $ 1,617.00 $ 91.00 $ 1,911.00
- SanitarY Sewer Ploe, Comolete in Place
Place and Test B-inch P.V.C., SDR-26, LF 499 $ 64.00 $ 31,936.00 $ 105.00 $ 52,395.00
- SanRarv Sewer Pioe, Comolete in Place
Place end Test Samtary Sewer Manhole EACH 1 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 4,900.00 $ 4,900.00
- ComDlete in Place for
Remove and Dispose Sanitary Sewer EACH 1 $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
. Manhole, Camolete In Place for
Remove and Dispose 6-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 18 $ 31.00 $ 558.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,800.00
Lead, Comolete in Place for
Remove and Dipose 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 499 $ 14.00 $ 6,986.00 $ 25.00 $ 12,475.00
Pioe, Comolete in Place
Page13 of
16
e
SECTION
ITEM
NO.
'1
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
i i. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK
DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
Remove and Dispose of Extsting Concrete SY 146 $ 7.00 $ 1,022.00 $ 21.00 $ 3,066.00
Driveways, Comolete in Place
Remove and Dispose of Existing Concrete SY 3,840 $ 5.00 $ 19,200.00 $ 15.00 $ 57,600.00
Roadway and Base(For Storm Sewer Insll
Remove and Dispose of Existing Concrete LF 910 $ 13.00 $ 11,830.00 $ 32.00 $ 29,120.00
Pioe, All Sizes, Camolete in Place
Remove and Dispose of Existing Concrete SY 44 $ 9.00 $ 396.00 $ 30.00 $ 1,320.00
Slooe Pavement, Comolete in Place
Remove and Relocate Existing Traffic and LS 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 12,800.00 $ 12,800.00
Roadwav SiDns, Includino all Incidental Rerns
Regrade Roadside Ditches, LF 1,228 $ 11.00 $ 13,508.00 $ 7.25 $ 8,903.00
Comolete In Place
Well Pointing System", LF 1,000 $ 16.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 40.00 $ 40,000.00
ComDlete in Place for
TOTAl.. COST - SECTION 1 $ 62,456.00 $ 152,809.00
BID TABULATION FOR
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10.oo to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
e
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOU"T SHOIIIfI. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOIIIfIIN PARENTHESES.
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING, INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
4 - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
18-lnch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Storm Sewer, LF 26 $ 50.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 49.00 $ 1,274.00
Complete in Place for
24-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Storm Sewer, LF 375 $ 60.00 $ 22,500.00 $ 75.00 $ 28,125.00
Complete In Place for
3G-inch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, SIDrm Sewer, LF 44 $ 85.00 $ 3,740.00 $ 89.00 $ 3,916.00
Complete In Place for
42-1nch R.C.P., C-76, CI. III, Storm Sewer, LF 40 $ 142.00 $ 5,680.00 $ 115.00 $ 4,600.00
Complete in Place for
48-inch R.C.P.. C-76, CI. III, Storm Sewer, LF 117 $ 171.00 $ 20,007.00 $ 139.00 $ 16,263.00
Complete in Place for
4'x4' R.C.B.,C850, Storm Sewer,including LF 268 $ 177.00 $ 47,436.00 $ 236.00 $ 63,248.00
Reducers and Transllions,Complete In Place
5'x4' R.C.B.,C850, Storm Sewer,including LF 775 $ 218.00 $ 168,950.00 $ 268.00 $ 207,700.00
Reducers and Transllions,Comlllete in Place
6'x4' R.C.B., C850, Storm Sewer. LF 1,529 $ 256.00 $ 391,424.00 $ 319.00 $ 487,751.00
Complete in Place for
Page14 of
16
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING, INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
SECTION 3 - STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
21 Hydro-Mulch Seeding, Complete for ACRE 0.4 $ 1,100.00 $ 440.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,000.00
22 Block Sodding, Complele for SY 320 $ 4.00 $ 1,280.00 $ 4.00 $ 1,280.00
- TOTAL COST - SECTION 3 $ 1,720.00 $ 2,280.00
e
I
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING, INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
SECTION 2- UTIUTY ADJUSTMENTS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
17 Remove and Relay Existing 12" R.C.P. LF 36 $ 41.00 $ " 1,476.00 $ 47.00 $ 1,692.00
,Complete In Place for
18 Sanitary Sewer Bypass Pumping LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 11,500.00 $ 11,500.00
Complete In Place for
19 Trench Safely System (5'-10'), All Widths LF 333 $ 2.00 $ 666.00 $ 10.00 $ 3,330.00
Complete in Place for
20 Trench Safety System (5'-10'), All Widths LF 292 $ 4.00 $ 1,168.00 $ 12.00 $ 3,504.00
Complete in Place for
TOTAL COST - SECTION 2 $ 65,655.00 $ 119,012.00
rS65,691.00)
BID TABULATION FOR
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.e.F.e.D. UNIT A104.10-40 to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
" DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT. CORRECTED AMOUt
r SHOVlIN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOVlIN IN PARENTliESES.
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS INC.
5 - PAVING
DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
Base Repair with 8" Hot Mix Asphallc TON 297 S 55.00 S 16,335.00 S 55.00 S 16,335.00
Concrete Bese Course, Complete In Place
2" Hot Mixed Asphalic Concrete, Type "0" TON 691 S 48.00 S 33,168.00 S 45.00 S 31,095.00
Comolete in Place for
Page1S of
16
e
e
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS, INC.
SECTION. - DRAINAGE SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
31 Class "0" Concrete Seal Slab., SY 1,500 S 17.00 S 25,500.00 S 30.00 S 45.000.00
Comolete In Place for
32 Storm Sewer Manhole (24"~2"), per H.C. EACH 1 S 1,900.00 S 1,900.00 S 2,400.00 S 2.400.00
470-2, Comolete in Place for
33 Storm Sewer Manhole (48"-72"), per H.C. EACH 2 S 2,500.00 S 5,000.00 S 4,900.00 S 9,800.00
470-2, Comolete in Place for
34 Storm Sewer Manhole on Existing R.C.P. EACH 4 S 3,100.00 S 12,400.00 S 1,500.00 S 8.000.00
124"~2"l, Comolete In Place for
35 Storm Sewer Manhole on R.C.B., Per H.C. EACH 18 S 700.00 S 11,200.00 S 1,900.00 S 30,400.00
470-2, Complete In Place for
36 ;Type "A" Inlet, Modified, EACH 3 S 2,200.00 S 6,600.00 S 1,200.00 S 3,600.00
Comolete in Place for
37 ITYPe "A" with Concrete Apron EACH 5 S 3,100.00 S 15,500.00 S 1,500.00 S 7,500.00
Comolete In Place for
36 Roadside D~ch Interceptor Structure, per EACH 2 S 1,800.00 S 3,600.00 S 500.00 S 1,000.00
Plans. Comolete In Place for
39 Special Storm Junction Box. per Plans EACH 9 S 3,400.00 S 30,600.00 S 3,300.00 S 29.700.00
Comolete in Place for
40 Precast30-inch Safely End Treatment, EACH 24 S 1,100.00 S 26,400.00 S 1,700.00 S 40,800.00
-V- 3:1, Complete in Place for
Precast30-lnch Safely End Treatment, EACH 4 S 1,400.00 S 5,600.00 S 1.800.00 S 7,200.00
3:1, Comolete in Place for
42 18-lnch Rein/creed Concrete Collar, EACH 2 S 250.00 S 500.00 S 200.00 S 400.00
----ar Complete in Place for
8-inch Thick - 39 inch Brick Wall Plug, EACH 16 S 200.00 S 3,200.00 I 280.00 I 4,480.00
~ Comolete in Place for
Broken Concrete Rip-Rap with l-Layer SY 80 S 38.00 S 3,040.00 S 2.55 S 204.00
Trevlra 1125, Geotexllle Fabric If Approved
~ EQual Comolete in Place for
Trench Safely System, (5'-10'), All Widths, LF 3,201 S 1.00 S 3,201.00 S 2.00 S 6,402.00
Complete in Place for
TOTAL COST. SECTION 4 S 815,278.00 S 1,007,763.00
'.
BID TABULATION FOR
SUNRISE DRIVE FROM H.C.F.C_D. UNIT A104-10~ to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
TOTAL CONSTRUCTlm~ COST - SUNRISE DRIVE
DENOTES ERROR IN BID DOCUMENT, CORRECTED AMOUI IT SHOWN. INCORRECT AMOUNT SHOWN IN PARENTHESES.
1,036,811.70
(*$1,036,847.70)
PagB16 of
16
e
54
53
$
(13) (14)
CALCO CONTRACTING, INC. RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS,INC.
[6 - TRAFFIC SIGNS AND TRAFFIC MARKERS
DESCRIPTION UNIT BID QUANT. UNIT BID TOTAL BID UNIT BID TOTAL BID
Place, Maintain and Remove Project Signs, EACH 3 S 900.00 S 2,700.00 S 900.00 S 2,700.00
Harris Countv, ComDlete In Place for
Tr8llic Handling and Control during LS 1 S 10,000.00 S 10,000.00 S 38,000.00 S 38,000.00
Construction including Signs, Barricades,
. and Channellzina Devices. ComDlete In Place
White Relectorized Solid Pavement Markings SF 1.891.7 S 1.00 S 1,891.70 S 1.20 S 2,270.04
Widths as per Plans, Complete In Place
TOTAL COST. SECTION 6 $ 14,591.70 $ 42,970.04
$
1,391,126.44
50
51
e
49
SECTION
ii'EM
NO.
48
DESCRIPTION
Prime Coal, MC-30
Complete In Place for
Tack Coat
Complete In Place for
Milling Asphalt Concrete Pavement, 2-lnch,
Complete In Place lor
6- Thick Reinforced Concrete Driveways,
Com~ete In Piece for
TOTAL COST. SECTION 5
$
77,111.00
$
66,292.40
SY
1~
s
SO.OO
$
6,900.00
s
40.00
s
5,~.00
SY
4,092
s
4.00
s
16,368.00
$
2.20
s
9,llll2.4O
GAL
UNIT
GAL
310
BID QUANT.
1,860
$
$
2.00
s
620.00
$
2.00
s
~.OO
PAVING
SUNRISE DRIVE
1
FROM H.C.F.e.D. UNIT A104-10-4ll
BID TABULATION FOR
UNIT BID
(13)
CALCO CONTRACTING~ INC.
to FAIRFIELD AVENUE
2.00
$
TOTAL BID
3,720.00
s
s
(14)
RAY FERGUSON INTERESTS, INC.
TOTAL BID
'3,720.00
e
e
REOUE,,"OR CfIY COUNCIL AGENDA na
Agenda Date Requested: Febnwy 8. 1999
Requested By: Robert T. Herrera Department: Administration
_ Report _ Resolution XXX Ordinance
Exhibits:
1. Ordinance No.
2. Proposed Agreement between City of La Porte and HalllBarnum Architects -
New Community Library Project
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
The Library Consultant Selectiolll Committee recommends Hall/Bamum Architects be considered as the architectural finn to
design La Porte's new library filc:ility. HalI/Bamum has experience with building or remodeling libraries in the surrounding
area that are similar in size and scope as our proposed facility, such as Lake Jackson, Missouri City, Friendswood and
Pearland.
The agreement with Hall/Barnum Architects, as presented to Council, will encompass the full design through construction
phases. At this time, staff is recommending Council approve $15,000.00 for the initial Programming and Master Planning
phase, only. Once this phase is completed and staffhas a more accurate assessment of the probable construction costs, the
fee for basic architectural services will be 8% of the approved probable construction costs. Staffwill return to City Council
for approval of the costs for basic architectural services. The agreement document, itself: will not change.
$35,000.00 for Preliminary Architectural and Engineering Services is budgeted for Fiscal Year 1998-99 in the
Inftastructure Fund #005-9897-787. Funds are available for the Programming and Master Planning phase of this project.
A percentage of the $15,000.00 will be disbursed to the architectural finn based on completion of each portion of the
Programming and Master Planning phase, as outlined in the finalized agreement.
Action Required by Council:
Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with HaI1IBamum Architects for Architectural Services for the
new community library project.
A vallability of Funds:
General Fund WaterlWastewater
_ Capital Improvement _ General Revenue Sharing
XXX Other (InfrastnJcture)
Account Number: 005-9897-787 Funds Available: XXX YES NO
-
Aooroved for Citv Council Ae:enda
~~l'~'
Robert T. Herrera Date
City Manager
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99-2312
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF LA PORTE AND HALL/BARHtJM ARCHITECTS, INC., TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE NEW CITY LIBRARY;
PROVIDING FOR AN INITIAL APPROPRIATION OF $15,000.00, TO FUND SAID
CONTRACT; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE
SUBJECT; FINDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes
the contract, agreement, or other undertaking described in the
title of this ordinance, in substantially the form as shown in the
document which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute such
document and all related documents on behalf of the City of La
Porte. The City Secretary is hereby authorized to attest to all
such signatures and to affix the seal of the City to all such
documents. City Council appropriates the initial sum not to exceed
$15,000.00 for site analysis, programming, and master planning,
from Fund No. 005, to fund said contract, to be reimbursed
hereafter from the proceeds of sale of Section 4B Sales Tax Revenue
Bonds by the city of La Porte Development Corporation.
Section 2. The City Council officially finds, determines,
recites, and declares that a sufficient written notice of the date,
hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City Council was
posted at ~ place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the
City for the time required by law preceding this meeting, as
required by the Open Meetings Law, Chapter 551, Texas Government
Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public as required
by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject
e
e
matter thereof has been discussed, considered and formally acted
upon.
The City Council further ratifies, approves and confirms
such written notice and the contents and posting thereof.
section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after
its passage and approval, and it is so ordered.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of February, 1999.
CITY OF LA PORTE
By:
Norman L. Malone,
Mayor
ATTEST:
~fllljjfJJ/
tha A. Gl.llett,
City Secretary
2
e
e
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY LIBRARY
CLP Project No. 99-2201
February 1999
It
It
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page(s)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARTIEs/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SECTION 1 BASIC SERVICES OF ARCHITECT
1.1 General
1.2 Schematic Design Phase
1.3 Design Development Phase
1.4 Construdion Documents Phase
1.5 Bidding or Negotiation Phase
1.6 Construction Phase
1.7 Operational Phase
1-1 through 1-8
SECTION 2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF ARCHITECT
2.1 Services Requiring Authorization in Advance
2.2 Required Additional Services
2-1 through 2-3
SECTION 3 OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
SECTION 4 PERIODS OF SERVICE
SECTION 5 PAYMENT TO ARCHITECT
SECTION 6 CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST
6.1 Construction Cost
6.2 Opinions of Cost
3-1 through 3-3
4-1 through 4-2
S.1 through S.3
6-1 through 6-2
SECTION 7 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
7 .1 Termination
7.2 Reuse of Documents
7.3 Insurance
7.4 Controlling Law
7.5 Successors and Assigns
7.6 Arbitration
7-1 through 7-2
SECTION 8 SPECIAL PROVISIONS, EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES
8-1
Exhibit A FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF ARCHITECT BASIC
SERVICES AND RELATED MA TIERS
Exhibit B DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS OF
AUTHORITY OF THE RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE
Exhibit C PROJECT COMMUNICATION
A-1 through A-3
8-1 through 8-5
C-1
Exhibit D INSURANCE
0-1
e
e
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
OWNER AND ARCHITECT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of February 8, 1999 between the City of La
Porte, Texas (OWNER) and Hall I Barnum Architects (ARCHITECT). OWNER
intends to engage in Programming and Master Planning and eventually construct a
new Community Library (hereinafter called the PROJECT).
The OWNER and ARCHITECT agree as set forth below:
Architect will conduct an initial meeting with the Building Committee to establish
overall goals for the project including function, image, cost, etc., set strategies for
the ProgramminglMaster Planning process, and confirm milestone dates. Additional
meetings with the Friends of the Library, library activity groups, and library staff will
be scheduled as required.
Following these meetings this activity will involve three phases: Site Analysis,
Programm ing, Master Planning.
Phase 1: Site Analysis
Architect will review site information furnished by City and identify site issues which
will influence the design of the new library, inCluding image, site features, access,
neighborhood, etc.
Phase 2: Programming
This step will confirm the space requirements for the Master Plan and the detailed
space requirements for the new library. Architect will conduct an on-site work
session involving representatives of Friends of the Library, each activity group and
appropriate library staff. Architect will review the program information with the
Building Committee and document it in a final Building Program Report to include
the following:
. Statement of purpose
· Space analysis initial and future needs
. Confirm priorities for library services provided
e
e
. Reference to ralevant guidelines/criteria used to develop the program
. Initial and future staffing levels
. Estimated construction costs (Initial and future)
· Anticipated furnishings, fixtures, technology, equipment and estimated costs
· Estimated annual operating budget for the initial building, staffing levels and
materials
. Projected construction schedules
Phase 3: Master Planning
Following City approval of the program, Architect will conduct a series of work
sessions with the Building Committee to develop a Master Plan, including
diagrammatic floor plans and architectural character sketches. Architect will
provide budget updates at each work session, working with a qualified contractor to
project costs on a square foot basis. Upon approval of the Master Plan, Architect
will prepare presentation drawings, coordinate the preparation of a colored
rendering, and participate in a presentation to the City.
The Site Analysis, Programming, and Master Planning Phase will be completed
and documents submitted within 90 days following written authorization from
OWNER to ARCHITECT to proceed with that phase of services.
Payment to Architect for Programming/Master Planning activity will be a lump sum
amount of $15,000.
Upon completion of the Programming/Master Planning activity, and after written
authorization from Owner, the Architect shall proceed with the Basic Services of
Architect as hereinafter described.
e
e
SECTION 1 - BASIC SERVICES OF ARCHITECT
1.1 General
1.1.1 ARCHITECT shall provide for OWNER professional architectural services in all
phases of the. Project to which this Agreement applies as hereinafter provided. These
services will include serving as OWNER's professional representative for the Project,
providing professional consultation and advice and furnishing customary structural,
mechanical, and electrical engineering services incidental thereto.
1.1.2 The ARCHITECTs services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent
with professional skil~ and care and the orderly progress of the work. The ARCHITECT
shall submit for the OWNER's approval a schedule for the performance of the
ARCHITECTs services, which shall include allowances for periods of time required for the
OWNER's review and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over
the Project. Time limits established by this schedule approved by the OWNER shall not,
except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the ARCHITECT.
1.1.3 The ARCHITECTs services consist of those services performed by the
ARCHITECT, ARCH1TECTs employees and ARCHITECTs consultants employed as
hereinafter provided.
1.2 Schematic Design Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Schematic Design Phase, the
ARCHITECT shall:
1.2.1 Consult with the OWNER to clarify and redefine OWNER'S requirements for the
Project and review available data and shall arrive at a mutual understanding of any
amended requiremenfts with the OWNER.
1.2.2 The ARCHITECT shall provide a preliminary evaluation of the OWNER'S program,
schedule and construction budget requirements, each in terms of the other, subject to the
limitations set forth.
1.2.3 The ARCHITECT shall review with the OWNER alternative approaches to design
and construction of fthe Project and provide a general econom ic analysis of various
alternatives in writing.
1.2.4 Based on the mutually agreed-upon program, schedule and construction budget
requirements, the ARCHITECT shall prepare, for the OWNER, revised Schematic Design
Drawings and other related documents. The Schematic Design Documents will include the
ARCHITECTS opinion of probable costs for the project, including
the following, which will be separately itemized:
Construction Cost(s):
materials and equipment costs,
materials testing and equipment costs,
allowances for laboratory testing,
1-1
e
e
appropriate contingencies,
and special instructions,
Allowance for ArchitecturaVEngineering Cost{s}:
estimated expenses for daily project
representation during construction,
appropriate contingencies,
and (if furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of other
professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for
or damages to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be
provided by others for OWNER pursuant to paragraphs 3.7 through 3.11, inclusive. The
total of all such costs, allowances, etc. are hereinafter called 'Total Project Costs".
The duties and responsibilities of ARCHITECT during the Schematic Design Phase are
amended and supplemented as indicated in paragraph 2 of Exhibit A "Further Descriptions
of Basic Services and Related Matters".
1.3 Design Development Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Design Development Phase,
ARCHITECT shall:
1.3.1 In consultation with OWNER and based on the approved Schematic Design
documents and any adjustments authorized {in writing} by the OWNER in the program
schedule or construction budget, the ARCHITECT shall detennine the general scope,
extent and character of the Project.
1.3.2 The ARCHITECT shall prepare Design Development documents consisting of final
design criteria, preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the
Project.
1.3.3 Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the type described in paragraph 3.4
are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services.
1.3.4 Based on the infonnation contained in the Design Development documents, submit
a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs (as defined in paragraph 1.2.4).
1.3.5 Furnish five copies of the above Design Development documents and present and
review them in person with OWNER.
The duties and responsibilities of ARCHITECT during the Design
Development Phase are amended and supplemented as indicated in paragraph 3 of
Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services and Related Matters".
1.4 Construction Documents Phase
1-2
e
e
After written authorization to proceed with the Final Construction Documents
Phase, ARCHITECT shall:
1.4.1 Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further
adjustments in the scope or quality of the PROJECT, in the construction budget or in the
total PROJECT budget authorized in writing by the OWNER, the ARCHITECT shall
prepare, for approval by the OWNER, Construction Documents consisting of Drawings
(hereinafter called Drawings) and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for
the construction of the PROJECT by Contractor(s). The specifications shall be orepared
in conformance with the sixteen-division format of the Construction Soecifications Institute.
1.4.2 See that the Construction Documents include applicable requirements/approvals of
governmental authorities having jurisdiction to approve the design of the project. Provide
technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for OWNER's use in filing
applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as
have jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in completing
permit application and in consultation with appropriate authorities.
1.4.3 Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project
Costs (as defined in paragraph 1.2.4) caused by changes in general scope, extent or
character or design requirements of the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to
OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based on the Drawings and
Specifications.
1.4.4 Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors
contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and bid
forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders and other related documents.
The ARCHITECT will initially submit to OWNER the Contractor Agreement
(in the form of AlA document A101) and the General Conditions of the Contract (in the
form of AlA document A201) for OWNER'S review, comment, modification, and approval.
1.4.5 Furnish five copies of the above documents (following approval) and of the
Drawings and Specifications and present and review them in person with OWNER.
The duties and responsibilities of ARCHITECT during the Construction
Documents Phase are supplemented as indicated in paragraph 4 of Exhibit A "Further
Description of Basic Services and Related Matters".
1.5 Bidding or Negotiation Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Bidding or negotiation Phase,
ARCHITECT shall:
1.5.1 Following the OWNER's approval of the Construction Documents and of the latest
preliminary estimate of Construction Cost the ARCHITECT shall assist OWNER in
advertising for and obtaining bids or negotiating proposals for the prime contrad for
construction, materials, equipment and services; and, where applicable, maintain a record
1-3
e
.
of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents have been issued, attend pre-bid
conferences and receive and process deposits for Bidding Documents.
1.5.2 Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding
Documents.
1.5.3 Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of subcontractors,
suppliers and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor (herein
called "Contractor") for those portions of the work as to which such acceptability is required
by the Bidding Documants.
1.5.4 Consult with OWNER concerning and determine the acceptability of substitute
materials and equipment proposed by Contractor when substitution prior to the award of
contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents.
1.5.5 Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in
evaluating bids or proposals and in assembling and awarding the contract(s) for
construction, materials, equipment and services.
The duties and responsibilities of ARCHITECT during the Bidding or
Negotiation Phase are amended and supplemented as indicated in paragraph 5 of Exhibit
A "Further Desaiption of Basic Services and Related Matters".
1.6 Construction Phase
After written authorization to proceed with the Construction Phase;
ARCHITECT shall:
1.6.1 General Administration of Construction Contract
ARCHITECT shall consult with and advise OWNER and act as OWNER's
representative as provided in the Standard General Conditions of the Construction
Contract (as approved by OWNER per paragraph 1.4.4).
The extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities and authority of
ARCHITECT as assigned in said Standard General Conditions shall not be modified,
except to the extent provided in paragraph 6 of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic
Services and Related Matters" and except as the ARCHITECT may otherwise agree in
writing. All of OWNER's instructions to Contractor(s) will be issued through ARCHITECT
who will have authority to act on behalf of OWNER to the extent provided in said Standard
General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing.
1.6.2 Visits to Site and Observation of Construction.
In connection with observation of the work of Contractor(s) while it is in
progress:
1-4
.
e
1.6.2.1 ARCHITECT shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the various
stages of construction as ARCHITECT deems necessary in order to observe as an
experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various
aspects of Contractor(s)' work. In addition, the ARCHITECT and/or OWNER may provide
the services of a Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at the site to
assist ARCHITECT and to provide more continuous observation of such work. Based on
information obtained during such visits and on such observations, ARCHITECT shall
endeavor to determine in general if such work is proceeding in accordance with the
Contract Documents and ARCHITECT shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the
work.
1.6.2.2The Resident Project Representative (and assistants) may be ARCHITECTs agent
or employee and under ARCHITECTs supervision or may be the OWNER's agent or
employee and under OWNERS supervision. The duties and responsibilities of the
Resident Project Representative (and assistants) are set forth in Exhibit B "Duties,
Responsibilities and Urn itation of Authority of Resident Project Representative". Any
exceptions or modifications to these responsibilities and limitations will be mutually agreed
upon by both parties in writing.
1.6.2.3The purpose of ARCHITECTs visits to and representation by the Resident Project
Representative (and assistant, if any) at the site will be to enable ARCHITECT to better
carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by ARCHITECT
during the Construction Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of ARCHITECTs efforts as an
experienced and qualffied design professional, to provide for OWNER a greater degree of
confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will conform generally to the Contract
Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as reflected in the Contract
Documents has been implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand,
ARCHITECT shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of
Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct or have control over Contractor(s)' work
nor shall ARCHITECT have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s), for safety
precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s), for safety precautions and
programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply
with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s)
furnishing and perform ing their work.
1.6.4 Interpretations and Clarifications
ARCHITECT shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the
Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes; and
after consultation with owner, prepare change orders as required for owners review and
approval.
1.6.5 Shop Drawings
ARCHITECT shall review and approve (or take other appropriate action in
respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the General Conditions), product
data, sample(s) and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit, but only for
1-5
.
e
confonnance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the infonnation
given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not
extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to
safety precautions and programs incident thereto.
1.6.6 Substitutes
ARCHITECT shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute
materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s), but subject to the provision of
paragraph 2.2.2. (Required Additional Services) All substitutes shall be approved by
OWNER.
1.6.7 Inspections and Tests
ARCHITECT shall advise OWNER and OWNER shall approve of any
special inspection or testing of the work, and ARCHITECT shall receive and review all
certificates of inspections, testings and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations,
ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to detennine generally that
their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate
compliance with the Contract Documents.)
1.6.8 Disputes between OWNER and Contractor
ARCHITECT shall act as initial interpreter of the requirements of the
Contract Documents and judge of the acceptability of the work thereunder and make
decisions on all claims of OVVNER and Contractor(s} relating to the acceptability of the
work or the interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining to the
eXeaJtion and progress of the work. ARCHITECT shall not be liable for the results of any
such interpretations or decisions rendered in good faith.
1.6.9 Applications for Payment
Based on ARCHITECTs on-site observations as an experienced and
qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project
Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and
schedules:
1.6.9.1ARCHITECT shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s} and recommend
in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts. Such recommendations of payment
will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that
the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of ARCHITECTs
knowledge, information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with
the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole
prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in
the Contrad Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In
the case of unit price work, ARCHITECTs recommendations of payment will include final
1-6
.
e
determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any subsequent
adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents).
1.6.9.2By recommending any payment ARCHITECT will not thereby be deemed to have
represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been
made by ARCHITECT to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is
furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ARCHITECT
in this Agreement and the Contract Documents. ARCHITECrs review of Contractor(s)'
work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on ARCHITECT
responsibility to suparvise, direct or control such work or for the means, method
techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs
incident thereto or Contractor(s) compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not
impose responsibility on ARCHITECT to make any examination to ascertain how or for
what purposed any contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price,
or to determine that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER
free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may
not be other matters at issue between OWNER and CONTRACTOR that might affect the
amount that should be paid.
1.6.10 Contractor(s)' Completion Documents
ARCHITECT shall receive and review maintenance and operating
instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of inspection, tests and
approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract
Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the
requirements of, and in the case of certificates of inspection, test and approvals the results
certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall bind, index and
transmit them to OWNER together with written comments.
1.6.11 Inspections
ARCHITECT shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is
substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is
acceptable so that ARCHITECT may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s)
and may give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable
(subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such recommendation and notice
will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph 1.6.9.2.
1.6.12 limitation of Responsibilities
ARCHITECT shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any
Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s) or
subcontractor's or supplier's agents or employees or any other persons (except
ARCHITECrs own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or
performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 1.6.1
through 1.6.11 inclusive, shall be construed to release ARCHITECT from liability for failure
1-7
.
e
to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ARCHITECT in the Contract
Documents.
The duties and responsibilities of the ARCHITECT during the Construction
Phase are amended and supplemented as indicated in Paragraph 6, Exhibit A "Further
Desaiption of Basic Services and Related Matters".
1.7 Operational Phase
During ihe Operational Phase, ARCHITECT shall:
1.7.1 Furnish the deliverable items referred to in
Section 1.6.10 and in the Operational Phase and present and review them in person with
OWNER.
1.7.2 Define in Contract Documents the Contractor(s) (and or Vendor(s)) responsibility in
connection with the start up, refining, and adjustment of any equipment or system.
1.7.3 Define in Contract Documents the Contractor(s) (and or Vendor(s)) responsibility
for training owners staff to operate and maintain any equipment or system and for
reviewing pertinent manuals, submittals, shop drawings, and warranties supplied by the
Contractor(s), Vendor(s), or Manufacturer(s) as the case may be.
1.7.4 Coordinate, attend and participate in the start up and training orientations as
described in paragraphs 1.7.2 and 1.7.3.
1.7.5 Record Drawings.
ARCHITECT shall furnish the OWNER a set of marked up prints, drawings
and other data kept by the Contractor(s), and Project Representative (if employed by the
ARCHITECT) in a form and manner that clearly depicts significant changes made during
the construction process.
1.7.6 At a time eleven (11) months following Substantial Completion of the project (one
month prior to expiration of the Contractor's warranty period), the ARCHITECT, in the
company of the OWNER, will visit the project to observe any apparent deficiencies in the
completed construction, and document any items observed in a written report issued to the
CONTRACTOR and OWNER.
1.7.7 During the Operational Phase, the ARCHITECT will assist the OWNER in
consultations and discussions with CONTRACTOR concerning the correction of
deficiencies brought to the ARCHITECrs attention, and when appropriate, review or make
written recommendations regarding replacement or correction of the Work as proposed by
the Contractor.
1-8
-
~
w
SECTION 2 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF ARCHITECT
2.1 Services Requiring Authorization in Advance
If authorized in writing by OWNER, ARCHITECT shall furnish or obtain from
others Additional Services of the types listed in paragraphs 2.1.1 through 2.1.14, inclusive.
These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided
otherwise in Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services and Related Matters"; these
will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 5.
2.1.1 Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those
furnished under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in
connection with the Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and
impact statements; review and evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the
Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and assistance in
obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental
impact of the Project.
2.1.2 Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or
facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by OWNER.
2.1.3 Services resu!ting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or
character of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size,
complexity, OWNER's schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and
revising previously accepted studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents
when such revisions are required by changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation of such studies, reports or
documents, or are due to any other causes beyond ARCHITECTs control.
2.1.4 Providing renderings or models for OWNER's use.
2.1.5 Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)'
work which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work.
2.1.6 Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of
operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value engineering during the
course of design; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic
evaluations, rate schedules and appraisals; assistance in obtaining financing for the
Project; evaluation processes available for licensing and assisting OWNER in obtaining
process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material, equipment and labor; and audits
or inventories required in connection with construction performed by OWNER.
2.1.7 Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for
other than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary structural,
mechanical and electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental
thereto); and providing data or services of the types described in paragraph 3.4 when
2-1
.
e
OWNER employs ARCHITECT to provide such data or services in lieu of furnishing the
same in accordance with paragraph 3.4.
2.1.8 If ARCHITECTs compensation is on the basis of a lump sum or percentage of
Construction Cost or cost-plus a fixed fee method of payment, services resulting from the
award of more separate prime contracts for construction, materials, equipment or services
for the Project shall be compensated in accordance with paragraph 5.1.2.
2.1.9 Services during out-of-town travel required of ARCHITECT other than visits to the
site or OWNER's office as required by Section 1.
2.1.10 Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for
construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to
complete services called for in paragraph 6.2.2.5.
2.1.11 Providing any type of property surveys or related professional services needed for
the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposed and any
necessary surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s} to proceed with their work; and
providing other special field surveys.
2.1.12 Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic
Services under paragraph 1.7.3.
2.1.13 Preparation of a set of reproducible record prints of drawings showing those
significant changes made during the construction process, based on the marked up prints,
drawings and other data furnished by Contractor( s} and Resident Project Representative
to ARCHITECT. Prior to preparation of record drawings the ARCHITECT and OWNER
will mutually agree on which changes are considered significant.
2.1.14 Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any
litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project
(except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services under
paragraphs 1.2.3 and 1.4.2).
2.1.15 Additional services required in connection with the Project, including services
required which were not furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 3, and services
not otherwise provided for in this Agreement.
2.2 Required Additional Services
When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond
ARCHITECrs control, ARCHITECT shall furnish or obtain from others, as circumstances
require during construction Additional Services of the types listed in paragraphs 2.2.1
through 2.2.6, inclusive (except to the extent otherwise provided in Exhibit A "Further
Description of Basic Services and Related Matters"). These services are not included as
part of Basic Services. ARCHITECT shall advise OWNER promptly of need for required
additional services. If the OWNER is in agreement, OWNER shall provide authorization to
2-2
.
.
ARCHITECT for such Additional Services, which will be paid for by OWNER as indicated
in Section 5.
2.2.1 Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect
changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services
is not commensurate with the addition services rendered.
2.2.2 Services in making revisions to Drawings and Specifications occasioned by the
OWNER's acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the
award of each contract in evaluation and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable
or excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor.
2.2.3 Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as
a direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages.
2.2.4 Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work
damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or
neglected work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving
services beyond normal working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor.
2.2.5 Services (other than Basic Services during the Operation Phase) in connection with
any partial utilization of any part of the Project by OWNER prior to Substantial Completion.
2.2.6 Evaluating an unreasonable or extensive number of claims submitted by
Contractor( s) or others in connection with the work.
2-3
e
e
SECTION 3 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
OWNER shall do the following in a timely a manner so as not to delay the
services of ARCHITECT:
3.1 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER's representative with
respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such person shall have
complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define
OWNER's policies and decisions with respect of ARCHITECTs services for the Project.
3.2 Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's requirements for the
Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance
requirements, flexibility and expandabiI ity, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish
copies of all design and construction standards which OWNER will require to be included
in the Drawings and Specifications.
3.3 Assist ARCHITECT by placing at ARCHITECTs disposal all available
information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative
to design or construction of the Project.
3.4 Furnish to ARCHITECT, as required for performance of ARCHITECTs Basic
Services (except to the extent provided otherwise in Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic
Services and Related Matters"), the following:
3.4.1 Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation borings,
probings and subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and
inspections of samples, materials and equipment;
3.4.2 appropriate professional interpretations of all of the foregoing;
3.4.3 environmental assessment and impact statements;
3.4.4 property, boundary, easement, and right-of-way, topographic, and utility surveys
and related office computations and drafting;
3.4.5 property descriptions;
3.4.6 zoning, deed and other land use restriction; and
3.4.7 other special data or consultation not covered in Section 2; all of which
ARCHITECT may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement.
3.5 Provide engineering surveys to establish reference points for construction
(except to the extent provided otherwise in Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services
and Related Matters") to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work.
3-1
e
e
3.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ARCHITECT to enter upon
public and private property as required for ARCHITECT to perform services under this
Agreement.
3.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals
and other documents presented by ARCHITECT, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance
counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and
render in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay
the services of ARCHITECT.
3.8 Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having
jurisdiction over the project and such approvals and consents from others as may be
necessary for completion of the Project. ARCHITECT will assist the OWNER in the
preparation of said permits.
3.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance
counseling services as may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER
may require or ARCHITECT may reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining
to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor( s}, such auditing service as
OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the
moneys paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as OWNER
may require to ascertain that Contractor(s} are complying with any law, rule, regulation,
ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishings and performing the work.
3.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER as the site who is not
ARCHITECT or ARCHITECrs agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and
limitations of authority of such other person and the effect thereof on the duties and
responsibilities of ARCHITECT and the Resident Project Representative (and any
assistants) will be set forth in an exhibit that is to be identified, attached to and made a part
of this Agreement before such services begin.
3.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials,
equipment and services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have
authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime
contractors.
3.12 Furnish to ARCHITECT data or estimated figures as to OWNER's
anticipated costs for services to be provided by others for OWNER (such as services
pursuant to paragraphs 3.7 through 3.11, inclusive and other costs of the types referred to
in paragraph 1.2.6) so that ARCHITECT may make the necessary findings to support
opinions of probable Total Project Costs.
3.13 Attend the pre-bid conference, bid opening, preconstruction conferences,
construction progress and other job related meetings and substantial completion
inspections and final payment inspections.
3-2
e
e
3.14 Give prompt written notice to ARCHITECT whenever OWNER observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the scope or timing of
ARCHITECTs services, or any defed or nonconformance in the work of any Contrador.
3.15 Furnish, or direct ARCHITECT to provide, Additional Services as stipulated
in paragraph 2.1 of this Agreement or other services as required.
3.16 During the Operational Phase, the OWNER will document all warranty items
brought to the Contrador's attention in writing to the ARCHITECT.
3.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 3.
3-3
e
e
SECTION 4 - PERIODS OF SERVICE
4.1 The provisions of this Sedion 4 and the various rates of compensation for
ARCHITECTs services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in
anticipation of the orderly and continuous progress of the Project through completion of the
Construdion Phase. ARCHITECTs obligation to render services hereunder will extend for
a period which may reasonably be required for the design, award of contrads,
construdion and initial operation of the Projed including extra work and required
extensions thereto. If in Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services and Related
Matters" specific periods of time for rendering services are set forth or specific dates by
which services are to be completed are provided and if such dates are exceeded through
no fault of ARCHITECT, all rates, measures and amounts of compensation provided
herein shall be subject to equitable adjustment
4.2 The services called for in the Schematic Design Phase will be completed
and the Schematic Design submitted within the stipulated period indicated in paragraph 2
of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services and Related Matters" after written
authorization to proceed with that phase of services which will be given by OWNER within
thirty days after ARCHiTECT has signed this Agreement.
4.3 Mer acceptance by OWNER of the Schematic Design Phase documents
indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or charader
of the Projed desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER,
ARCHITECT shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Design
Development Phase, and shall submit preliminary design documents and a revised
opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the stipulated period indicated in paragraph
3 of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic Services and Related Matters".
4.4 Mer acceptance by OWNER of the Design Development Phase
documents, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent
or charader of the Projed desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from
OWNER, ARCHITECT shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the
Construdion Documents Phase; and shall deliver Contrad Documents and a revised
opinion of probable Total Project Costs for all work of Contrador(s) on the Projed within
the stipulated period indicated in paragraph 4 of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic
Services and Related Matters".
4.5 ARCHITECTs services under the Schematic Design Phase, Design
Development and Construdion Documents shall each be considered complete at the
earlier of (1) the date when the submissions for that phase have been accepted by
OWNER or (2) thirty days after the date when such submissions are delivered to OWNER
for final acceptance, plus in each case such additional time as may be required for
obtaining approval of governmental authorities having jurisdidion to approve the design of
the Projed.
4-1
e
e
4.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the ARCHITECrs Drawings, Specifications
and Construction Documents Phase documentation induding the most recent opinion of
probable Total Project Cost and upon written authorization to proceed, ARCHITECT shall
proceed with performance of the services called for in the Bidding or Negotiating Phase.
This Phase shall terminate and the services to be rendered thereunder shall be
considered complete upon commencement of the Construction Phase or upon cessation
of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s) except as may otherwise be required to
complete their services called for in paragraph 6.2.2.5).
4.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the prime
contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate
sixty (60) days after a) the actual date of Substantial Completion. Construction Phase
services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts if the
Project involves more than one prime contract.
4.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and
will terminate one year after the date of Substantial Completion of the prime contract for
construction, materials and equipment on which substantial completion is achieved.
4.9 If OWNER has requested significant modifications or changes in the general
scope, extent or character of the Project, the time of performance of ARCHITECrs
services shall be adjusted equitably.
4.10 If OWNER fails to give prompt written authorization to proceed with any
phase of services after completion of the immediately preceeding phase, or if the
Construction Phase has not commenced within 180 calendar days (plus such additional
time as may be required to complete the services called for under paragraph 6.2.2.5) after
completion of the Final Design Phase, ARCHITECT may, after giving seven days written
notice to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement.
4.11 If ARCHITECrs services for design or during construction of the Project are
delayed or suspended in whole or in part by OWNER for more than three months for
reasons beyond ARCHITECrs control, ARCHITECT shall on written demand to OWNER
(but without termination of this Agreement) be paid as provided in paragraph 4.1.1. If such
delay or suspension extends for more than one year for reasons beyond ARCHITECrs
control, or if ARCHITECT for any reason is required to render Construction Phase services
in respect of any prime contract for construction, materials or equipment more than 60
days after Substantial Completion is achieved under that contract, the various rates of
compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement may be subject to equitable
adjustment.
4.12 In the event that the work designed or specified by ARCHITECT is decided
to be furnished or performed under more than one prime contract. the ARCHITECT will be
compensated in accordance with paraaraph 5.1.2.
4-2
e
e
SECTION 5 - PAYMENTS TO ARCHITECT
Paragraphs 5.1 and 5.1.1.1 will be completed upon Owner approval of the
Building Program Report and Master Plan as described under this
Agreement.
5.1 OWNER has established an initial construction cost limit of
($ ) for the Project available for construction.
5.1.1 For Basic Services. OWNER shall pay ARCHITECT for Basic Services rendered
under Section 1 (as amended and supplemented by Exhibit A "Further Description of
Basic Services and Related Matters") as follows:
5.1.1.1 A lump sum in the amount of
($ ). This lump sum amount equals eight percent (8%) of the
Owner approved Estimated Construction Costs as determined by the Building Program
Report and Master P~an. Progress payments for Basic Services in each phase shall total
the following percentages of the total basic compensation payable:
Schematic Design Phase
Design Development Phase
Construction Documents Phase
Bidding or Negotiation Phase
Construction Phase
Operational Phase
fifteen percent
twenty percent
thirty-five percent
five percent
twenty percent
five percent
( 15%)
( 20%)
( 35%)
( 5%)
( 20%)
( 5%)
Total Compensation for Basic Services $
5.1.1.2Should the ARCHITECTs Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate or the lowest
bona fide proposal or bid amount exceed the amount in section 5.1 as available for
construction, the ARCHITECT may be required at the discretion of the OWNER to amend
the design to bring the construction cost estimate or bid amount within the amount
specified without additional cost to the OWNER.
5.1.1.31f the work is not carried on after Construction Document Phase and drawings,
specifications and Construction Documents are completed and approved, the OWNER will
pay the ARCHITECT through the Construction Documents Phase in accordance with
Section 5.1.1 above; or, if the bids have been received, the OWNER will pay the
ARCHITECT seventy-five percent ( 75%) of the fee as specified in Section 5.1.1.1.
5.1.1.4The ARCHITECTS responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction
Phase under this Agreement commences with the award of the Contract for Construction
and terminates sixty (60) days after a) the actual date of Substantial Completion. Services
provided after this date shall be considered Additional Services with the compensation due
in accordance with Subparagraph 5.1.2 of this Agreement and shall require OWNER'S
written authorization.
5-1
e
e
5.1.2 For Additional Services. OWNER shall pay ARCHITECT for Additional Services
rendered under Section 2 as follows:
On an hourly basis, using Standard Office Billing Rates and Categories
identified in paragraph 5.5 of this Agreement, or as mutually agreed between
OWNER and ARCHITECT prior to the commencement of any such
services.
5.1.2.1 Resident Project Services. For Services of ARCHITECTs Resident Project
Representative (and assistants) furnished under paragraph 1.6.2.1., compensation shall
be computed as follows:
On an hourly basis, using Standard Office Billing Rates and Categories
identified in paragraph 5.5 of this Agreement, or as mutually agreed between
OWNER and ARCHITECT prior to the commencement of any such
services.
5.1.2.2Professional Associates and Consultants. For services and Reimbursable
Expenses of independent professional associates and consultants employed by
ARCHITECT to render Additional Services pursuant to paragraph 2.1 or 2.2, the amount
billed to ARCHITECT therefor times a factor of 1.10.
5.1.3 For Reimbursable Expenses. In addition to payments provided for in paragraphs
5.1.1 and 5.1.2, OWNER shall pay ARCHITECT the actual costs of all Reimbursable
~nses incurred in connection with all Basic and Additional Services.
5.1.4 The term "Reimbursable Expenses" has the meaning assigned in paragraph 5.4.
5.2 Times of Payments.
5.2.1 ARCHITECT shall submit monthly statement for Basic and Additional Services
rendered and for Reimbursable Expenses incurred. The statements will be based upon
ARCHITECTs estimate of the proportion of the total services actually completed at the
time of billing. OWNER shall make prompt monthly payments in response to
ARCHITECTs monthly statements.
5.3 Other Provisions Concerning Payments.
5.3.1 Invoices for basic and additional services shall be mailed on or before the first (1st)
of the month and shall be payable on or before the fifteenth (15th) of the month.
5.4. Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and
Additional Services and include expenses incurred by the ARCHITECT and ARCHITECTs
employees and consultants in the interest of the Project, as identified in the following
clauses.
5-2
e
e
5.4.1 Expenses in connection with authorized out-of-town travel; long-distance
communications; and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over
the Project. Expenses for automobile travel during the performance of basic services shall
be considered incidental. For private automobile travel beyond performance of basic
services mileage will be reimbursed at JO.31/mile.
5.4.2 Expense of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings, Specffications and
other documents, photographic materials and developing expense, long-distance phone
calls, and faxes.
5.4.3 If authorized in advance by the OWNER, expense of overtime work requiring higher
than regular rates.
5.4.4 Expense of renderings, models and mock-ups requested by the OWNER.
5.4.5 Expense of additional insurance coverage or limits, including professional liability
insurance, requested by the OWNER in excess of that normally carried by the
ARCHITECT and ARCHITECrs consultants.
5.5 The following table of Standard Office Billing Rates shall be in effect where
applicable under paragraph 5.1.2 and 5.1.2.1 of this Agreement:
Partners
Project Manager
Project Architects
Interior !Designers
Professional Staff
Secretarial Staff
$115.00
$ 95.00
$ 85.00
$ 75.00
$ 65.00
$ 50.00
If requested by OWNER, the ARCHITECT will submit a list of employees,
their appropriate title and billing rates prior to authorization of services that will be
compensated by the Standard Office Billing Rates in paragraph 5.5.
5-3
e
e
SECTION 6 - CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST
6.1 Construction Cost
The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as
"Construction Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project
designed and specified by ARCHITECT, but it will not include ARCHITECTs
compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or
damages to properties, nor will it include OWNER's legal, accounting, insurance
counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection
with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant
to paragraphs 3.7 through 3.11, inclusive. (Construction Cost is one of the items
comprising Total Project Costs which is defined in paragraph 1.2.4.)
6.2 Opinions of Cost
6.2.1 Since the ARCHITECT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment
or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices,
or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ARCHITECTs best judgment as an
experienced and qualified professional, familiar with the construction industry; but
ARCHITECT cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or
Construction Costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by ARCHITECT.
If prior to the Bidding or Negotiating Phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to Total
Project or Construction Costs, OWNER shall employ an independent cost estimator as
provided in paragraph 3.9.
6.2.2 If a Construction Cost limit is established by written agreement between OWNER
and ARCHITECT and specifically set forth in this Agreement as a condition thereto, the
following will apply:
6.2.2.1 The acceptance by OWNER at any time during the Basic Services of a revised
opinion of probable Total Project or Construction Costs in excess of the then established
cost limit will constitute a corresponding revision in the Construction Cost limit to the extent
indicated in such revised opinion.
6.2.2.2Any Construction Cost limit so established will include a contingency of four percent
(4%) unless another amount is agreed upon in writing.
6.2.2.3ARCHITECT will be permitted to determine what types of materials, equipment and
component systems are to be included in the Drawings and Specifications and to make
reasonable adjustments in the general scope, extent and character of the Project to bring it
within the cost limit.
6.2.2.41f the Bidding or Negotiating Phase has not commenced within six months after
completion of the Final Design Phase, the established Construction Cost limit will not be
binding on ARCHITECT, and OWNER shall consent to an adjustment in such cost limit
6-1
e
e
commensurate with any appli~ble change in the general level of prices in the construdion
industry between the date of completion of the Final Design Phase and the date on which
proposals or bids are sought.
6.2.2.51f the lowest bona fide proposal or bid exceeds the established Construdion Cost
limit, OWNER shall (1) give written approval to increase such cost limit, (2) authorize
negotiating or rebidding the Projed within sixty (60) days, or (3) cooperate in revising the
Project's general scope, extent or charader to the extent consistent with the Project's
requirements and with sound engineering/architectural practices. In the case of (3),
ARCHITECT shall modify the Contrad Documents as necessary to bring the Construction
Cost within the cost limit. No compensation will be made for services in making such
modifications per paraaraph 5.1.1.2. The providing of such service will be the limit of
ARCHITECrs responsibility in this regard and, having done so, ARCHITECT shall be
entitled to payment for services in accordance with this Agreement and will not otherwise
be liable for damages attributable to the lowest bona fide proposal or bid exceeding the
established Construction Cost.
6-2
e
e
SECTION 7 - GENERAL CONSIDERATION
7.1 Termination.
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the other party in the event of substantial failure by the other party to fulfill
its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party.
7.2 Reuse of Documents.
All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared or furnished by
ARCHITECT (and ARCHITECTs independent professional associates and consultants)
pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project. The
ownership and property interest therein shall be granted to the OWNER when the Project
is completed. ARCHITECT shall supply a set of reproducible record drawings for the
OWNER in accordance with Section 1.3.6. OWNER may make and retain copies for
information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by
OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be
suitable for reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other
project. Any reuse by OWNER without written verification or adaptation by ARCHITECT
for the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER's sole risk and without liability or legal
exposure to ARCHITECT, or to ARCHITECTs independent professional associates or
consultants, and OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless ARCHITECT and
ARCHITECTs independent professional associates and consultants from all claims,
damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting
therefrom. Any such verification or adaptation will entitle ARCHITECT to further
compensation at rates to be agreed upon by OWNER and ARCHITECT.
7.3 Insurance
During term of this agreement, ARCHITECT shall maintain levels of
insurance as described in Exhibit D.
7.3.1 ARCHITECT shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from claims under
worker's compensation acts, claims for damages because of bodily injury, sickness or
disease or death of any and all employees or of any person other than such employees,
and from claims or damages because of injury to or destruction of property including loss
of use resulting therefrom.
7.4 Controlling Law
This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of business of OWNER.
7.5 Successors and Assigns
7-1
e
e
7.5.1 OWNER and ARCHITECT each is hereby bound and the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ARCHITECT (and to
the extent permitted by paragraph 7.5.2 the assigns of OWNER and ARCHITECT) are
hereby bound to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party,
in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement
7.5.2 Neither OWNER nor ARCHITECT shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under
or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys
that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent
that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this
limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written
consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any
duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
prevent ARCHITECT from employing such in~ependent professional associates and
consultants, as ARCHITECT may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of basic
services hereunder.
7.5.3 Nothing under this agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in
this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ARCHITECT, and all duties and
responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive
benefit of OWNER and ARCHITECT and not for the benefit of any other party.
7.6 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any controversy or claim arising out of or
relating to this agreement promptly by negotiation between senior executives of the parties
who have authority to settle the controversy.
The disputing party shall give the other party written notice of the dispute. Within ten days
after receipt of said notice, the receiving party shall submit to the other a written response.
The notice and response shall include (a) a statement of each party's position and a
summary of the evidence and arguments supporting its position, and (b) the name and title
of the executive who will represent that party. The executive shall meet at a mutually
acceptable time and place within twenty days of the date of the disputing party's notice
and thereafter as often as they reasonably deem necessary to exchange relevant
information and to attempt to resolve the dispute.
If the controversy or claim has not been resolved within thirty days of the meeting of the
senior executives, the parties shall endeavor to settle the dispute by mediation under the
Center for Public Resources Model Procedure for Mediation of Business Disputes or
pursue amicable termination.
If the matter has not been resolved pursuant to the aforesaid mediation procedure within
sixty days of the commencement of such procedure, (which period may be extended by
mutual agreement), Of if either party will not participate in such procedure, the parties shall
pursue amicable termination.
7-2
e
e
SECTION 8 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS. EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES
8.1 This Agreement is subject to the following special provisions.
8.2 The following Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this Agreement:
8.2.1 Exhibit A "Further Descriptions of Basic Services and Related Matters" consisting of
~pages.
8.2.2 Exhibit B "Duties, Responsibilities and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project
Representative" consist of ~pages.
8.2.3 Exhibit C "Project Organizational Chart and Communication" consist of l...page.
8.2.4 Exhibit 0 "lnsurance" consists of 1 page.
8.3 This Agreement (consisting of 36 pages) together with the Exhibits and
schedules identified above constitutes the entire agreement between OWNER and
ARCHITECT and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This Agreement and
said Exhibits and schedules may only be amended, supplemented, modmed or cancelled
by a duly executed written instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as
of the day and year first above written.
OWNER:
CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS
6<~ T. \~
City Manager
ATTEST
~(L14111<11
Ci y cretary
ATTEST
(SEAL)
8-1
e
e
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A TO AGREEMENT BElWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, dated February 8, 1999
FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF ARCHITECT BASIC SERVICES AND RELATED
MATTERS
1. This is an exhibit attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference
into the Agreement made on February 8, 1999, between the City of La Porte
(OWNER) and Hall I Barnum Architects (ARCHITECT) providing for professional
services. The Basic Services of ARCHITECT as described in Section 1 of the
Agreement are amended or supplemented as indicated below and the time periods
for the performance of certain services as indicated in Section 4 of the Agreement
are stipulated as indicated below.
2. During the Schematic Design Phase ARCHITECT shall:
a. Provide document sets to OWNER as outlined in paragraph
1.2.4.
b. Attend ...z.. meeting with City staff to discuss progress and
direction of the work. After the meeting ARCHITECT shall
circulate for approval a set of minutes that outline the key
topics discussed and any decisions, directions, etc. agreed
upon by OWNER and ARCHITECT.
The Schematic Design Phase will be completed and documents submitted within
45 days following written authorization from OWNER to ARCHITECT to proceed
with that phase of services.
3. During the Design Development Phase ARCHITECT shall:
a. Provide document sets to OWNER as outlined in paragraph
1.3.5.
b. Attend ~ meetings with City staff to discuss progress and
direction of the work. After each meeting ARCHITECT shall
circulate for approval a set of minutes that outline the key
topics discussed and any decisions, directions, etc. agreed
upon by OWNER and ARCHITECT.
The Design Development Phase Services will be completed and Contract
Documents and ARCHITECTs opinion of costs submitted within 60 days following
written authorization from OWNER to ARCHITECT to proceed with that phase of
A-I
e
e
services.
4. During the Construction Documents Phase ARCHITECT shall:
Prepare construction documents ready for bidding, including the following
tasks:
a. Construction drawings will be prepared at appropriate scale
and include:
Cover Sheet/Area Maps
Location Plans/Sheet Indicators
Final Site Plan
Mechanical Plans and Elevations
Final Electrical and Instrumentation
Detail Sheets
b. Concurrent with the development of design drawings, the
ARCHITECT will develop contract documents and
specifications. Final specifications will be presented to
OWNER for approval.
c. Attend ~ meetings with City staff to discuss project and
direction of the work. After each meeting ARCH ITECT shall
circulate for approval a set of minutes that outline the key
topics discussed and any decisions, directions, etc. agreed
upon by OWNER and ARCHITECT.
d. Make formal subm ittal of Drawings, Specifications and
Contract Documents for the OWNER's review at the following
completion stages:
Interim
Pre-Final
sets.
Final - 100% of Detailed Design provide 5 sets.
- 50 % of Detailed Design provide 1 set.
- 90 % of Detailed Design provide 3
e. The ARCHITECT will develop a final 'Total Probable cost"
estimate.
f. Provide document sets to OWNER as outlined in
Paragraph 1.4.5.
The Construction Document Phase Services will be completed and the
Report subm itted within ~ calendar days following written authorization
from OWNIER to ARCHITECT to proceed with that phase of services.
A-2
e
e
5. During the Bidding or Negotiating Phase ARCHITECT shall:
a. Assist OWNER in conducting the prebid conferences and
prequalification of bidders as required by City of La Porte
Ordinance No. 1476-A
Ordinance 1476-A requires all Contractors desiring to bid on
construction projects having an estimated construction cost of
greater than $300,000, must pre-qualify by filing a satisfactory
Contractor's Statement. The Contractor's Statement requires
the filing of both a Financial Statement and an Equipment and
Experience Statement.
The ARCHITECT shall review the Equipment and Experience
Statements submitted by the Contractor, check references and
prepare a written report and recommendation based on their
findings.
The ARCHITECT shall not be responsible for evaluating the
financial statement submitted by Contractors.
The Bidding or Negotiating Phase Services will be completed per terms of
paragraph 4.6.
6. During the Construction Phase ARCHITECT shall:
a. During the Construction Phase the ARCHITECT shall
make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the
various stages of construction. After contractor has
submitted construction schedules, the OWNER and
ARCHITECT will mutually agree on key stages of
construction that will warrant and require visits by
ARCHITECT. However. the total visits to site by the
ARCHITECT shall average 1 per week over the term of
construction.
The Construction Phase Services will be completed per terms of paragraph 4.7.
A-3
e
e
EXHIBIT B
A LISTING OF THE DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND
LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF THE RESIDENT PROJECT
REPRESENTATiVE.
This is an Exhibit attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference with
the Agreement made on February 8, 1999, between The City of La Porte, Texas
(OWNER) and Hall I Barnum Architects (ARCHITECT) providing for professional
services.
OWNER may furnish a Resident Project Representative (RPR), assistants
and other field staff to assist ARCHITECT in observing performance of the work of
Contractor.
Through more extensive on-site observations of the work in progress and
field checks of materials and equipment by the RPR and assistants, ARCHITECT
shall endeavor to provide further protection for OWNER against defects and
deficiencies in the work of CONTRACTOR; but, the furnishing of such services will
not make ARCHITECT responsible for or give ARCHITECT control over
construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety
precautions or programs, or responsibility for CONTRACTOR's failure to perform
the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents and in particular the specific
limitations set forth in paragraph 1.6 of the Agreement are applicable.
The duties and responsibilities of the RPR are limited to those of
ARCHITECT in ARCHITECTs agreement with the OWNER and in the construction
Contract Documents, and are further limited and described as follows:
A General
RPR is ARCHITECTs agent at the site, will act as directed by and under the
supervision of ARCHITECT, and will confer with ARCHITECT regarding RPR's
actions. RPR's dealings in matters pertaining to the on-site work shall in general be
with ARCHITECT and CONTRACTOR keeping OWNER advised as necessary.
RPR's dealings with subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge
and approval of CONTRACTOR. RPR shall generally communicate with OWNER
with the knowledge of and under the direction of ARCHITECT.
B. Duties aUld Responsibilities of RPR
1. Schedules:
Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing
submittals and schedule of values prepared by
CONTRACTOR and consult with ARCHITECT concerning
acceptability.
B-1
e
e
2. Conferences and Meetings:
Attend meetings with CONTRACTOR, such as
preconstruction conferences, progress meetings, job
conferences and other project-related meetings, and prepare
and circulate copies of minutes thereof.
3. Liaison:
a. Serve as ARCHITECTs liaison with CONTRACTOR,
working principally through CONTRACTOR's
superintendent and assist in understanding the intent of the
Contract Documents; and assist ARCHITECT in serving as
OWNER's liaison with CONTRACTOR when
CONTRACTOR's operations affect OWNER's on-site
operations.
b. Assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or
information, when required for proper execution of the
Work.
4. Shop Drawings and Samples:
a. Record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples.
b. Receive samples which are furnished at the site by
CONTRACTOR, and notify ARCHITECT of availability of
samples for examination.
c. Advise ARCHITECT and CONTRACTOR of the
commencement of any Work requiring a Shop Drawing or
sample if the submittal has not been approved by
ARCHITECT.
5. Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests:
a. Conduct on-site observations of the Work in progress to
assist ARCHITECT in determining if the Work is in general
proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents.
b. Report to ARCHITECT whenever RPR believes that any
Work is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or does not
conform to the Contract Documents, or has been
damaged, or does not need the requirements of any
inspection, test or approval required to be made; and
advise ARCHITECT of Work the RPR believes should be
corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for
observation, or requires special testing, inspection or
approval.
B-2
e
e
c. Verify that tests, equipment and systems startups and
operating and maintenance training are conducted in the
presence of appropriate personnel, and that
CONTRACTOR maintains adequate records thereof; and
observe, record and report to ARCHITECT appropriate
details relative to the test procedures and startups.
d. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other
agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, record the
results of these inspections and report to ARCHITECT.
6. Interpretation of Contract Documents:
Report to ARCHITECT when clarifications and interpretations
of the Contract Documents are needed and transmit to
CONTRACTOR clarifications and interpretations as issued by
ARCHITECT.
7. Modifications:
Consider and evaluate CONTRACTOR's suggestions for
modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report
with RPR's recommendations to ARCHITECT. Transmit to
CONTRACTOR decisions as issued by ARCHITECT.
8.
Records:
a.
Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence,
report of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples,
reproductions of original Contract Documents including
all Work Directive Changes, Addenda, Change Orders,
Field Orders, additional Drawings issued subsequent to
the execution of the Contract, ARCHITECTs
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract
Documents, progress reports, and other Project related
documents.
b. Keep a diary or log book, recording CONTRACTOR
hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative
to questions of Work Directive, Change Orders or
changed conditions, list of job site visitors, daily
activities, decisions, observations in general, and
specific observations in more detail as in the case of
observing test procedures; and send copies to
ARCHITECT.
B-3
e e
c. Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of
all CONTRACTORS, subcontractors and major
suppliers of materials and equipment.
9. Reports:
a. Furnish ARCHITECT periodic reports as required of
progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and
sample subm ittals.
b. Consult with ARCHITECT in advance of scheduled
major tests, inspections or start of important phases of
the Work.
c. Draft proposed Change Orders and Work Directive
Changes, obtaining backup material from
CONTRACTOR and recommend to ARCHITECT
Change Orders, Work Directive Changes, and Field
Orders.
d. Report immediately to ARCHITECT and OWNER upon
the occurrence of any accident.
10. Payment Requests:
Review applications for payment with CONTRACTOR for
compliance with the established procedure for their
submission and forward with recommendations to
ARCHITECT, noting particularly the relationship of the
payment requested to the schedule of values, Work
completed, and materials and equipment delivered at the site
but not incorporated in the Work.
11. Certificates, Maintenance and Operation Manuals:
During the course of the Work, verify that certificates,
maintenance and operation manuals and other data required
to be assembled and furnished by CONTRACTOR are
applicable to the items actually installed and in accordance
with the Contract Documents, and have this material delivered
to ARCHITECT for review and forwarding to OWNER prior to
final payment for the Work.
12. Completion:
a.
Before ARCHITECT issues a Certificate of Substantial
Completion, submit to CONTRACTOR a list of
observed items requiring completion or correction.
B-4
e e
b. Conduct final inspection in the company of
ARCHITECT, OWNER, and CONTRACTOR and
prepare a final list of items to be completed or
corrected.
c. Observe that all items on final list have been completed
or corrected and make recommendations to
ARCHITECT concerning acceptance.
C. Limitations of Authority
Resident Project Representative:
1. Shall not authorize any deviation from the Contract Documents or
substitution of materials or equipment, unless authorized by
ARCHITECT.
2. Shall not exceed limitations of ARCHITECTs authority as set forth in
the Agreement or the Contract Documents.
3. Shall not undertake any of the responsibilities of CONTRACTOR,
subcontractors or CONTRACTOR's superintendent.
4. Shall not advise on, issue directions relative to or assume control
over any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures of construction unless such advice or directions are
specifically required by the Contract Documents.
5. Sha~1 not advise on, issue directions regarding, or assume control
over safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work.
6. Shall not accept Shop Drawing or sample submittals from anyone
other then CONTRACTOR.
7. Shall not authorize OWNER to occupy the Project in whole or in part.
8. Shan not participate in specialized field or laboratory tests or
inspections conducted by others except as specifically authorized by
ARCHITECT.
B-5
e
e
EXHIBIT C
TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, dated February 8, 1999
COMMUNICA liON
All correspondence shall include City of La Porte Project No. Job number. All
correspondence regarding this Agreement for Professional Services and fee
invoicing from ARCHITECT to OWNER shall be addressed as follows:
City of La Porte
Attention: Doug Kneupper, PE, Planning Director
PO Box 1115
La Porte, TX 77572-1115
Delivery Address:
604 West F airmont Parkway
La Porte, TX 77571
Deliveries related to project design and construction shall be sent to:
City of La Porte
Attention: Doug Kneupper, PE, Planning Director
604 West F airmont Parkway
La Porte, TX 77571
All correspondence from OWNER to ARCHITECT shall be addressed to:
Hall! Barnum Architects
Attention: William W. Hall, Jr., AlA
2727 Weslayan
Houston, TX 77027
C-1
e
e
EXHIBIT D TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ARCHITECT
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, dated February 8, 1999
This is an exhibit attached to, made a part of and incorporated by reference
into the Agreement made on February 8,1999, between the City of La Porte
(Owner) and Hall! Barnum Architects (Architect) providing for professional
services.
Section 7.3 of the Agreement is amended and supplemented to include the
following agreement of the parties:
The limits of liability for the insurance required by paragraph 7.3 of the
Agreement are as follows:
By Architect:
1. Worker's Compensation
Statutory
2.
Employer's Liability
$1,000,000
3.
General Liability
General Aggregate
Each Occurrence (Bodily Injury
and Property Damage)
$500,000
$1,000,000
4.
Excess Umbrella Liability
General Aggregate
$500,000
$500,000
5.
Automobile Liability
6.
Professional Liability
Each Occurrence
Aggregate
$250,000
$500,000
D-1
e
e
REOUES~OR CITY COUNC~ AGENDA IT.
Agenda Date Requested: February 8. 1999
Requested By: R.T. Herrera
Department: Administration
_ Report _ Resolution X
Ordinance
Exhibits:
Ordinance 99-2313
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
The attached Ordinance is an effort for the City of La Porte to keep minors from dancing in a public dance hall for
compensation.
Action Required by Council:
Staff recommends the adoption of the attached Ordinance as presented.
Availability of Funds:
General Fund_ W ater/W astewater
_ Capital Improvement_ General Revenue Sharing
Other .
Account Number:
Funds Available: YES NO
Approved for City Council A2enda
G<~ T. ~ .;l..A.t-1l\
Robert T. Herrera Date
City Manager
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99- 2313
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING ARTICLE III, "TAXI DANCING", OF CHAPTER 90, OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, RELATING TO
THE PRESENCE OF MINORS IN PUBLIC DANCE HALLS AND THEIR DANCING FOR
COMPENSATION; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATING TO
THE SUBJECT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING THAT ANY PERSON
VIOLATING THE TERMS OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE PUNISHABLE BY A FINE
NOT TO EXCEED FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($500.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF THE CAPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; FINDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of La Porte adopts Article III, 'Taxi
Dancing", of Chapter 90, "Entertainment", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of La
Porte, to read as follows, to-wit:
"Sec. 90-80. Definitions.
Minor shall mean a person under the age of 18 years whose disabilities as
a minor have not been removed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Public Dance means any dance or ball to which admission can be had by
payment of a fee, or by the purchase, possession or presentation of a ticket
or token, or in which a charge is made for caring for clothing, or any other
dance to which the public generally may gain admission with the payment
of a fee directuy or indirectly, or without payment of a fee.
Public Dance Hall means any room, place, space or building where a public
dance is held or conducted.
Sec. 90-81. Taxi dancing with minors prohibited.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any licensee or operator of a public dance
hall to suffer or permit a minor to engage in the activities commonly known
as 'taxi dancing', 'dollar dancing' or 'pony dancing', or the like, wherein any
person accepts, agrees to accept or solicits any cash, benefit or other thing
of monetary value for the privilege of dancing with a minor.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to offer, confer or agree to
confer any cash, benefit or other thing of monetary value to any person for
the privilege of dancing with a minor.
Ordinance No. 99- 2_3
Page 2
e
(c) It shall be unlawful for the minor or any other person to solicit,
accept or agree to accept any cash, benefit or other thing of monetary value
from any person for the privilege of dancing with a minor.
(d) The provisions of this section shall apply without regard to
whether (1) the minor is an employee, agent or contractor of the public
dance hall or is merely present in the public dance hall; (2) the cash, benefit
or other thing of monetary value is solicited or accepted by the licensee or
operator, the minor or any other person; and (3) the cash, benefit or other
thing of monetary value is solicited or accepted exclusively for the dancing
privilege or for food, beverage or other services or merchandise with which
the dancing privilege is also provided."
Section 2. That violations of Sections 90-80 or 90-81 of the Code of Ordinances,
La Porte, Texas, as adopted in Section 1 of this Ordinance, are punishable by a fine of up
to Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) as provided in Appendix B - Fines of the Code of
,
Ordinances of the City of La Porte.
Section 3. That, if any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase
of this Ordinance, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional, void or invalid, the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances
shall not be affected thereby, it being the intent of the City Council in adopting this
Ordinance that no portion hereof or provision or regulation contained herein shall become
inoperative or fail by reason of any unconstitution-ality, voidness or invalidity of any other
portion hereof, and all provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable for that
purpose.
Section 4. The City Council officially finds, determines, recites, and declares that
a sufficient written notice of the date, hour, place and subject of this meeting of the City
Council was posted at a place convenient to the public at the City Hall of the City for the
Ordinance No. 99- 2.3
Page 3
e
time required by law preceding this meeting, as required by the Open Meetings Law,
Chapter 551, Texas Government Code; and that this meeting has been open to the public
as required by law at all times during which this ordinance and the subject matter thereof
has been discussed, considered and formally acted upon. The City Council further
ratifies, approves and confirms such written notice and the contents and posting thereof.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its passage and
approval, and publication of its caption, as provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of February, 1999.
CITY OF LA PORTE
By:1L~~~
orman L. alon -
Mayor
ATTEST:
(1JJglJi~ (1 ~
art a A. Gillett
City Secretary
,~
~:dCQ
... (
.1'/1/ , ,.' ~e--~
nox W. Askins
City Attorney
e e
REOUE'FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITa
AgendaDateReq~eS d: Fe~8. 1999
;; /
Requested By: S. . ett Department: Public Works
_ Report _ Resolution XXX Ordinance
Exhibits:
Ordinance No. 99-915-RR
Letter of Reqlllest
Area Locatiol1l Map
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
The City of La Porte has received a request from Seadrift Pipeline Corporation to construct two (2) pipelines
in the city, as illustrated on the attached area map. The request is to construct a six-inch (6") Ethylene
pipeline and a ten inch (10") LPG pipeline, with a maximum pressure of2,I60 PSI and maximum temperature
of75 degrees Fahrenheit.
The request meets all requirements of Ordinance No. 915. The application fee of $600.00 and the first year's
permit fee of$400.00 have been paid. Any future relocation of the pipe lines permitted within the City, State,
or County rights-of-way shaH be at the sole expense of the permittee.
Action Required by Council: Approve Ordinance No. 99-915-RR approving a permit to Seadrift Pipeline
Corporation for a six-inch (6") Ethylene pipeline and a ten inch (10") LPG pipeline.
Availability of Funds:
General Fund_ Wateil'/Wastewater
_ Capital Improvement_ General Revenue Sharing
Other
Account Number:
N/A
Funds Available: YES NO
ADDroved for Citv Council. A2enda
QT~
Robert T. Herrera
City Manager
-z. - '1.- ,.~
Date
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99-915-RR
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A PERMIT UNDER SECTION 18-a-3 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 915, "PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION", BEING CHAPTER 18-A OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE, TEXAS, DATED NOVEMBER 25,
1975, TO CONSTRUCT A 6-INCH PIPE LINE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF
ETHYLENE GAS AND A 10-INCH PIPE LINE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF LPG;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PORTE:
section 10
The City Council of the City of La Porte has
received an application dated January 6, 1999, from SEADRIFT
PIPELINE CORPORATION, requesting a permit under Section 18-A-3 of
Ordinance 915, being Chapter 18-A of the Code of Ordinances of the
City of La Porte, to construct and operate its 6-inch pipe line for
the transportation of ETHYLENE and its 10-inch pipe line for the
transportation of LPG, crossing the City of La Porte, all as shown
on said application.
The application of SEADRIFT PIPELINE
CORPORATION has been reviewed by the City's Director of Public
Works, who has found that said application meets all requirements
of said Ordinance No. 915, and has recommended its approval.
section 2. The City Council of the City of La Porte hereby
approves the application of SEADRIFT PIPELINE CORPORATION, dated
January 6, 1999, and this Ordinance shall constitute a permit to
SEADRIFT PIPELINE CORPORATION to operate said pipe lines within the
City of La Porte, all in conformance with the requirements of
Ordinance No. 915, contingent upon its filing with the City of La
Porte prior to commencement of construction, copies of its permits
from the Texas Department of Highways and Transportation; Harris
County; and the Harris County Flood Control District. Any future
relocation of the pipe lines herein permitted, within the City,
State, or County rights-of-way, shall be at the sole expense of
permittee.
e
e
ORDINANCE NO. 99-915-RR
PAGE 2
section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and approval, and it is so ordered.
PASSED AND APPROVED, this 8th day of February, 1999.
By:
~~~
Ma r
ATTEST:
....,
/l
AP~RO~/ ./.} ,
.~1/V~.~
Knox W. Askins
City Attorney
e
e
SEADRIFT PIPELINE CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 186
PORT LAVACA, TEXAS 71979
LARRY J. TRCKA
LAND & RIGHT-OF-WAY
PHONE: (512) 553-3173
FAX: (512) 553-3122
SUBSIDIARY OF . CORPORATION
Re: Permit Application
~ ~ (p rr.; rI nn ~~l
il ~ LL; \.!!J U; U \!l
~~ JAN 1 1 1999 II
IBY
'D~a;~uW~n
41 JAN 1 3 1999 tl
PUBUC WORI(S
January 6, 1999
City Secretary
City of La Porte
P. O. Box 1115
La Porte, TX 77572-1115
Dear Sir or Madame:
Seadrift Pipeline Incorporation hereby requests a permit to install two pipelines: one 6"
Ethylene line and one 10" LPG line. The construction of both pipelines will be done sometime after
March, 1999. Installation will be done by open-cut, except at Fairmont Parkway and Spencer
Highway. The highways will be directionally drilled as shown in drawings attached. The maximum
operating pressure of the pipelines will be 2160 P.S.!. and the average operation temperatures of .
each line will be 75 degrees.
Attached you will find two (2) sets of plans showing the location, course and alignment of the
proposed pipelines. including the street crossings. Also attached is Seadrift Pipeline's check
#0001002202 in the amount of Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) which covers the fees for the permits.
Seadrift will hold the City of La Porte harmless from liability for injury or damage to person or
property caused by the aforementioned installation and shall pay all CSI:1ages cccused to tr.s City or
private property due to said installation, should any damage occur.
If there are any questions or if I can be of help, please call me at (512) 553-3173.
YOUffil~ C
:~_.... /.....:
," Larry-:?cka ,',. ' .. '.
Sr. Representative,.Land & Right-of-Way" ,,'
cc: Mr. J. H. Dial, Letter Only
4
e HARRIS COUNTY, TEX.
;.;
;q
-....-
4
r. - .
.. -,
;; I ;
;)
: ~:
'-
s,.
I
':1
o
o
. .. . ..... I ..!
..-.:..:.....t, ..1
.;~~~ - I "" ..1. ~
'. ,~. -.... " -/
,,~::...,~:,.I ",':
, "":---........... 1-.... . . "-~ .
.' ......::...~~~_ . _.:: ~.-.J. ~": 1
". :-;'h'nll~ ..
"
i 014
"
c:.
..,
.;
~
.;;
SI
a. '..
. ':
e
.:i -.1
.1:-
..
,;;
~.
.. ..... ",".
,.- ..
J"II1
:
I
I
. I
;. "'I i
. .,;1
~'
., 2:~
t. .
$1 .
.I.. ."
~ ~
. . I" .. .,;;". -L- STREEf
,.1
. . ~:; .. .... .,
.f'
1.\1
,. hilllt:I, P,llk' 'I
. ,
II"
SEE DWe. SEAPIU28
II .,: .r!.~(" '.I
....,.. .'t'~~
'"'' . I ~.
. huih!1
. f'.II~
.. .
I' .
.'
Ii
It. p'ROPOSED 10'
PIPELINE
~
..
(~!.
h
.. ,
I
It. PROPOSED 10' ~ 6'
PIPELINES
SEE ;DWG. SEAPIot127
0;
.r. SiREET (DEDICA.!!!ll
.E.~SlREET (DEDICA lED)
. --
'D. SIREET (DEDIC~)
.C' SWET (DEDICA~l
I. '"
, ,; HI
. :i:.,:,
sa DWO. SEAPill~L:' II ~
: i .:i" . ,.'1:
SE& DWG. SEAPIot 125 . .
.0
I'
o
I
. :
'-.
_.~ -.....-
"III"
111.l-1
'7 -
I
! 0
I
I.
I"
r
i.:: : Ii
. r SEE D~. SEAPIotl07
SEE OWC. SEAPM124 \. I, II ~\...~II ~ /..' I ~ .
~'i" ; ;rr~ij~ "( ~n d
'i ,J I i ~f: (""l '~'I" I. L
I' A SEE Df' SEAPIot'O~ ~ ,i ij; .., il'. I,' o~ ~.
..,.", . .. I . \. I w.'r f i'l ..Ill I ~ 11"01 1"-:
!!.!; - - - - I - --r-t_o'-"~'-""'-"'.'"
SEE DWG. ~~;2J '.1 \1'" "'J, i.' \.1 P.,lJ./iO.,~, !
t . C~Ult~9111~
,. i, ' i~ I r ' t.;l .. . ."
"'\;i ,I ": :j(lA h)H'I'II~t .;
i .. ',I. .
: ..is. ;;1111 i
:; ] I ! ~
: ~II"" i I
'" 7 .1," :
~ !ltJ I 1
~, . I', .
i": u. .,
II ~ t
j
" ,
" ,
: .
'OJ
,\1:' lIiJU I
..
~. I
..
I
.-
'1
~ '.'irI.Nl"LR
"71"... -
.'
ph IhJ:'.
...\ ,',
T.
o
1'1'
. ,
0,
....... :.,;;,,- - i'"'' ~-.
~.., ----..;:,:~:r ~ : :::
.. .
I
i
01
,. -,
i
=A'~JNf;:__;; ~:;;: J=~ !1:!..wr~'
. . . ;C-: . r.' .
- P
il .'
'r '",'''t
,.,..,q . I ~
. "0 . J ,,'I
, ,"'I' ~
I , Ie !I
..tk:1-;.:.."C:..-...~L::::"-;-';.~5"":'::':~ .~~ ":JV::~ _ .:.:':-~~:,'.~: .=i' ~~!.
. . ,... ,.1($ .j' "!I
i II r,rf.1 ..I:
J'l, : ..!I
i . I:' ; ~CW3~e .. ..i,'I'
. . if . D'SJ lo
.
,
r.
-. '\.
':~, .1
. i
. ,
"
,
'H.:4.r
" T
--' ..,,}
,! ~"
..
.~.!l", .
010
'.
t...\ I,~.
fI'l' ,I
..
("111
.f.
r,.
~
'J
.~
.
iiii,\'.
II " , ,
'i'"
I.......: :
hI.'; 1
...'
.!,
~
: :I~'
1'1'
..... .
.....
IiOlE;. BASE MAP WAS TAKEN FROM
U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE
LA PORTE. TEXAS
QUADRANGLE (1982)
DRAWN BY
SCALE
SEADRIFT ~ELOCAJION (STRANG RD.)
10' & 6' PIPELINE
VICINllY MAP
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
LOCAnON
REV.
DESCRIPTION
BY APP. DATE
Page
1
of
1
. Ucar Pipeline, Inc. ~
· 3200-3300 Kanawha Tu
· .: a P.O. Box 8888 - Building 2 00
South Charleston. WV 25303
e
1218
517349
CITY OF LA PORTE
604 W FAIRMONT PARKWAY
LA PORTE TX 77571
11Wfi.lit:q;tmiDlM~.#i K~1t4.j!W 111l1.ffll,jlj!f?lwIf&lilWi W'~I"jt_ijtl. 'flp.!lI~t1Igl;il' l~f.fitiw""l"~~"".m;~
Y~~:-x::::...... "'-:z:--.::.:: ..:.~;:-:-:::::~:::i: $>W-.... ~;l." ';.w.:;:;:,,~W:<;~~;;,l~"'" . .. 1\. ';'. .t.,...i;].R~ $>WWEi
99 ANNUAL FEES 01/08/1999 Micro 9013314335 $400.00 $0.00 $400.00
TOTAL $400.00 $0.00 $400.00
- -- - = -=--=--=-=~: = -= :-~-:.-.: ::~-=::-_--::-=--:-_-=-:=.::--:-;-_-::-::::~:..:-:::::-- ';::-=-;_:-:::::-_:~=_--:==-_-:..-:'_:...:~::-_--:::::'-------....=_...._._...
::,)...::.~,.:..
..' . :. .:." ,"
.. . . . ~ ..
U~'''''UNIi,JNC';;-"<''
S2l1N311O -1\n1likII
r.o. lax 8811. -..no _
-~WVZ51l113
. : .. \,
PAY IN U.S. DOLLARS . ,,' ". .,
..f~ ..: .:.,~ . ..'::.~ : . :'." . .. "'~' ':'.. .,,::' ,'_.'.: ..;
.............~......*FQUR ~AND OO/~pO po~.....~....~~.~.......
. . " :"
. ," . ....
"
'. .'.. . .
.'"TEXAS COMMERCE BANK. N.A.
'.:.~OUSTON. TEXAS
~
1110
-,
.'
',I"
....
CHECK DATE
CHECK NUMBER
0001002328
. . 01/14/1999
CITY OF LA PORTE '. ',::.
604 W FAIRMONT" PARKWAY
LA PORTE TX 77571
" . 0020036969
.
Wti{'~~i!ti@i~jWffi1
I :';. $4~~.OO I
.". .
. ....
TO' THE
ORDER OF
", ..... ~ ..,'.
802
I~",~
tl..~~~
VOID AFTER 180 DAYS
11'000 ~OO 2:1 28111 I: ~ ~ ~OO ~ ~ 501:
II' 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ? 2 :I b ~ 8 II'
e
e
LARRY TRCKA
LAND & RIGHT-OF-WAY
SENIOR RIGHT-OF-WAY AGENT
SEAORIFT PIPEUNE CORPORATION
UCAR PIPELINE INCCRPORAn:D
UCAR LOUISIANA P1PEUNE COMPANY
.
"'
'.
OFRCE: (512) 553-3173
FAX: (5121 553-312B
CELI.ULAR: (512) 550.3522
UNION CAFlSIDE COFlPOFlATION
P.O, BOX 1 BB. PORT LAVACA. TX 77979
e
e
SEADRIFT PIPELINE CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 186
PORT LAV ACA, TEXAS T1979
LARRY J. TRCKA
LAND & RIGHT-OF-WAY
PHONE: (512) 553-3173
FAX: (512) 553-3122
SUBSIDIARY OF . CORPORATION
January 6, 1999
City Secretary
City of LaPorte
P. O. Box 1115
LaPorte, TX 77572-1115
Re: Permit Application
Dear Sir or Madame:
Seadrift Pipeline Incorporation hereby requests a permit to install two pipelines, one 6"
Ethylene line and one 10" LPG line. The construction of both pipelines will be done sometime after
March, 1999. Installation will be done by open-cut, except at Fairmont Parkway and Spencer
Highway. The highways will be directionally drilled as shown in drawings attached. The maximum
operating pressure of the pipelines will be 2160 P .S.1.
Attached you will find two (2) sets of plans showing the location, course and alignment of the
proposed pipelines, including the street crossings. Also attached is Seadrift Pipeline's check
#0001002202 in the amount of Six Hundred Dollars ($600.00) which covers the fees for the permits.
Seadrift will hold the City of LaPorte harmless from liability for injury or damage to person or
property caused by the aforementioned installation and shall pay all damages caused to the City or
private property due to said installation, should any damage occur.
If there are any questions or if I can be of help, please call me at (512) 553-3173.
~
Larry J. T rcka
Sr. Representative, Land & Right-of-Way
cc: Mr. J. H. Dial, Letter Only
. Ucar Pipeline,lnc. e
· 3200-3300 Kanawha Turnpike
· .:. P.O. Box 8888 . Building 2000
South Charleston, 1M! 25303
Page
1
eOf
1
399
513894
CITY OF LA PORTE
604 W FAIRMONT PARKWAV
LA PORTE TX 77571
0020036969
12/18/1998
0001002202
k1i~!!N!9.jP~iit$fiffl: m&~Bl~1f.@ftW i~]~:'Wi'l!i~tfjE~t'~~!~t~jjl~~~t~t~~Ir~ tWf.mtmm~~:~I!Y~m~mrn il!~~tPf.~~9YttR!;~gW!ttM* @*W~ma~TI11,9j;~;%l%mfi
PIPELINE PERMIT 11/30/1998 Micro 8351306192 $600.00 $0.00 $600.00
.-
TOTAL $600.00 $0.00 $600.00
..- ....
. .{~\.),"
iW". '. .
..,t..
". ..;:. ,:'.: ':. ~:..': ~:: ,:.t.. '.': ::-:. d, ',,'. ,";<..'..,'" I
',:.r ",.' ::: ~.i~~~~g~~~~;E B~.~~.:~:~:: <::. :\ .<>~: :~.:: :<Y 3~~~~5:? .}J::.....~:.::.:~:...~.:.::.:.:)..;....;...J.;I
.' :..... '..:'.,.': ~ ,.". :." ....,.::::. ," ~ ...... .'.. .... ."
. ...... .~. .:. ..'
. i
,
-- ----------
__ - _un _ __
.:.;.: :i.~." ." ).,{::" ,:~';:
.". ~ .:. '':', ...:
ui:A~ '~piuNl, Die: :;~t '. :.
32\1103300 K_1\n1Iike
P.O. 80. 188B. BuIlding 2IlOO
_e~_253ID "':' .
,-" .' ~ ", "':~ ':';-: ..1,'
:,: .. .
.,::~ \. ....::.:.:.....:.
CHECK DATE
CHECK NUMBER
. PAY IN U.S~ DOLLARS .
't. .
12/l8/~998
0001.002~02
. ,
,
.' .
. ," .' ..
.................~.....stx HUNORED'A~ OO/100.~~............~.......*
. ..... :" . :'.. ;,'": :\. ':":": .~-~.;~. ....:... . .'~ .': . ::" . ..
TO THE ' . CIry OF LA."PORTE... '''. . \, . . ..' ." .
ORDER.OF. 604 W 'FAIRMONT"PARKWAV
LA PORTE TX 77571
0020036969
, ~n%1?H~fgiM9g8.tgM;F
" ::. ....~.. $6~O.OO I
.' i
..' 1
.. !
!
286'
/1.. ~
t.> 4Ji.I t,)u,iMrIp: .
. Authorized Signatures
VOID AFlER 180 DAYS '
III 0 0 0 I. 0 0 2 2 0 2111 I: I. I. I. 0 0 ~ I. 5 0 I :
ul 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ? 2 ~ b I. 8uI
e
e
\
CITY OF LA PORTE
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
Memo
To: Knox Askins, city Attorney
From: Steve Gillett, Director of Public Works
CC: Martha Gillett, City Secretary
Date: 01/12/99
Re: Ordinance Request - Pipeline Permit
Attached please find a letter of request for two (2) pipeline permits from Seadrift Pipeline
Corporation. The lines are one 6" Ethylene and one 10 LPG. The maximum operating
pressure and temperature is 2160 psi and75 degrees F respectively. Please prepare an
ordinance granting a permit for the relocation/construction of these two lines. I anticipate
bringing this before City Council at the first regular meeting in February.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Page 1
e
e
CITY OF LA PORTE
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
Memo
To: Knox Askins, city Attorney
From: Steve Gillett, Director of Public Works
cc: Martha Gilllett, City Secretary
Date: 01/12/99
Re: Ordinance Request - Pipeline Permit
Attached please .find a letter of request for two (2) pipeline permits from Seadrift Pipeline
Corporation. The lines are one (i' Ethylene and one 10 LPG. The maximum operating
pressure and temperature is 2160 psi and75 degrees F respectively. Please prepare an
ordinance granting a permit for the relocation/construction of these two lines. I anticipate
bringing this before City Council at the first regular meeting in February.
If you have any questions, please advise.
. Page 1
e
e
,
,.
e
e
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Date Requested: February 8. 1999
Requested By: Stephen L. Barr . Departmen,t -E...arks & Recreation
-m~~f:rr#~~
XX Report Resolution _ Ordinance
Exhibits: 1. Report on Relocation of Girl's Softball (already presented to
Council)
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
In last Monday's Council Workshop staff presented an overview of the progress made to
date on the relocation of girl's softball fields from Lomax Park to Little Cedar Bayou Park.
The initial project included re-aligning the existing three adult softball fields for youth play (i.e.
making outfields shorter, removing grass from infields, installing fences, etc.) and remodeling
the existing concession building to accommodate use by the LPGSA. To accommodate the
expected future expansion of the youth softball program in the City, plans were made to add a
fourth field to the Little Cedar Bayou Complex. Field 4 would be started under the current capital
program, and completed at a later date. Because the LPGSA has agreed to assist in the
process by moving fencing for Field 4 from the existing fields at Lomax, there are enough funds
left from the original $200,000 to pay for almost half of the lights for Field 4. Staff presented a
proposal last Monday to finish the project completely by lighting Field 4. To accomplish this
would require an additional appropriation of $45,000 from the Capital Improvement Fund's
Available Fund Balance.
The La Porte Girl's Softball Association is an integral part of our community. The leagues
and tournaments they schedule have a very large economic impact on the businesses in La
Porte. It makes sense 10 go ahead at this time and finish the additional field for use by this
organization. Future costs for electrical work, etc. will likely escalate, costing the City more in
the long run. The fourth field, when completed, will begin service immediately as a practice field
and for tournament play. It will allow the LPGSA to bid on regional and national tournaments as
a state-of-the-art facility that few other communities can offer
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that additional funds in the amount of $45,000 be appropriated
to complete the lighting of Girl's Softball Field 4 at Little Cedar Bayou Park.
Action Required by Council:
Consider appropriation of additional funds in the amount of $45,000 to complete the
lighting of Girl's Softball Field 4 at Little Cedar Bayou Park..
Availability of Funds:
General Fund
--2QL Capital Improvement
N/A
Account Number: Fund Balance
WaterlWastewater
_ General Revenue Sharing
Funds Available: XX YES
NO
Approved for City Council Aaenda
6iTl~
Robert T. Herrera
City Manager
2~i-'1f
Date
e e
"
e
e
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Requested By:
Report
Februarv 8. 1999
Susan Kelley".d ~ /./~
Resolution ~~7
Department:
Ordinance
Purchasing
Agenda Date Requested:
Exhibits: Attachment
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
This fiscal year, various departments have budgeted for Motorola hand held and mobile radios.
Historically, we have purchased these items from the Houston-Galveston Area Council through an
interlocal agreement. HGAC bids radios, yearly, for the surrounding entities, which helps to reduce
the price, due to volume buying.
The total expenditure, including a three percent (3%) administrative fee, would be $20,915.53. The
radios are the same price per unit as last year.
Departmental costs are as follows:
EMS Division $ 1,769.77
Municipal Court $ 884.88
Solid Waste Division $ 1,680.03
Water Division $ 560.01
Police Department $16,020.84
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in departmental accounts for these items.
Action Required by Council:
Authorize purchase of Motorola radios from HGAC in the amount of $20,915.53.
Availability of Funds:
xx General Fund
Capitallmprovemen~
Other
WaterlWastewater
General Revenue Sharing
Account Number: Various
Funds Available:
xx Yes
No
Approved for City CouncDl Agenda
c:x~ '\. ~
Robert T. Herrera, City Manager
Z. -'-L - ~ <\
Date
_998 RADIO PURCHASE e
DEPT/DIV DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE
EMS DIVISION HT1000 Handheld Radio 2 $752.00 $1,504.00
150595228021 Rapid Rate Charger 2 $43.20 $86.40
Remote Speaker 2 $63.91 $127.82
HGAC Fee 1 $51.55
TOTAL $1,769.77
MUNICIPAL COURT HT1000 Handheld Radio 1 $752.00 $752.00
160645128021 Rapid Rate Charger 1 $43.20 $43.20
Remote Speaker 1 $63.91 $63.91
HGAC Fee 1 $25.77
TOTAL $884.88
SOLID WASTE DIVISION Maxtrac 300 Mobile 3 $468.93 $1,406.79
170725328021 Antenna 3 $24.77 $74.31
Factory Program 3 $50.00 $150.00
HGAC Fee 1 $48.93
TOTAL $1,680.03
WATER DIVISION Maxtrac 300 Mobile 1 $468.93 $468.93
270855338050 Antenna 1 $24.77 $24.77
Factory Program 1 $50.00 $50.00
HGAC Fee 1 $16.31
TOTAL $560.01
POLICE PATROL HT1000 Handheld Radio 2 $752.00 $1,504.00
152535218021 Rapid Rate Charger 2 $43.20 $86.40
Remote Speaker Microphone 2 $63.91 $127.82
SUB-TOTAL $1,718.22
MTS 2000 Flashport Series 3 2 $1,016.40 $2,032.80
800 MHz Portable 2 $673.75 $1,347.50
Smart Zone Pkg 2 $783.86 $1,567.72
Encryption Board 2 $637.00 $1,274.00
Rapid Rate Charger 2 $69.30 $138.60
Remote Speaker 2 $63.91 $127.82
SUB-TOTAL $6,488.44
HGAC Fee 1 $246.20
TOTAL $8,452.86
POLICE CIO HT1000 Handheld Radio 1 $752.00 $752.00
152565218012 Rapid Rate Charger 1 $43.20 $43.20
Remote Speaker Microphone 1 $63.91 $63.91
SUB-TOTAL $859.11
MTS 2000 Flashport Series 3 2 $1,016.40 $2,032.80
800 MHz Portable 2 $673.75 $1,347.50
Smart Zone Pkg 2 $783.86 $1,567.72
Encryption Board 2 $637.00 $1,274.00
Rapid Rate Charger 2 $69.30 $138.60
Remote Speaker 2 $63.91 $127.82
SUB-TOTAL $6,488.44
HGAC Fee 1 $220.43
TOTAL $7,567.98
POLICE TOTAL $16,020.84
GRAND TOTAL $20,915.53
e
e
e
e
Green Renovation Workshop
Over the last two to three years we have experienced a lack of performance of the greens at
Bay Forest Golf Course. This deterioration is noticed by the golfers because the most common
complaint/question is "Are there any plans for improving the greens next year?" Although we
have had pretty good years in the past, we are noticing as significant decline in our number of
rounds, which have declined by 18% over the last two years. We can attribute some of this to
the number of new courses in the immediate area and the inclement weather, but certainly not
all of it. I feel like we have spent significant time making efforts to improve the condition of the
greens without renovating them. We have discussed the negatives of the 328 strand of
Bermuda grass. We have reviewed the situation and consulted with experts in the turf industry,
sent off soil samples, changed fertilizers and chemicals and tried to improve the conditions with
different maintenance programs. At this time, staff has developed two methods of improving the
quality of the greens.
proposal I
This proposal to renovate all eighteen greens and practice greens this year. We believe this
would be the most benefical way to improve the course and accelerate the revenues for Bay
Forest Golf Course. The condition of any golf course is the main benefactor to the number of
rounds played. You can see how the rounds at Bay Forest have decreased by observing the
attached information in your packet. (Exhibits A, B, C and D)
This is how we would implement this proposal:
. Hire a contractor specializing in green replanting
. Schedule a date for the construction
. Plan to close tihe greens for 8 to 9 weeks (Course would remain open by use of
temporary greens and reduced green fees).
. The construction time would be approximately one week. The grow in time for the new
grass would be approximately 7 to 8 weeks.
Method of renovation:
. Stripping sod off of existing greens.
. Till the seed bed and add any material needed.
. Rough shape ~or surface drainage.
. Fumigate the greens with Methol Bromide.
. After the removal of the covers, shape the greens with a laser instrument.
. Prepare surface for planting.
. Finally, plant with certified Dwarf Tif Bermuda grass.
e
e
Financial Impact:
Forecasted cost of Renovation is
$ 116,000
Forecasted loss of revenue is
160,000
27.000
$ 303,000
Contingency for project is
Total forecasted Financial Impact
Method of Financing:
. Use $10,000 we have budgeted this year for the putting green replacement/expansion.
. Eliminate the purchase of a reel sharpener from capital budget ($20,000). rNe have
determined this sharpener is not needed because we have found a vendor who will
come to our site and sharpen all of our reels).
. Eliminate the construction of a restroom on the back nine until utilities are available
($30,000). (Because it appears we might not be putting in the South La Porte Relief
Sewer line, we would not have a sewer tie in for the restroom. We do not want to put in
a septic system on the course.)
. This would make available $60,000 in capital funds available this year, leaving a balance
of $243,000 to be financed.
We currently have $470,000 reserved for expansion of our clubhouse and pro shop. Since we
firmly believe the largest contributing factor to the decline in pl~y at the golf course is caused by
the poor quality of the greens, we think it would not be wise to spend funds on improving the
clubhouse and pro shop while our greens are deteriorating. With that in mind, the $470,000 is
probably the most suitable funding source to get the necessary $243,000. After we complete
the renovation of the greens and our revenues pick back up, we could at that time consider
clubhouse improvements.
proposal II
We may be able to improve the on course greens by using alternate aerification methods such
as "Deep Tining" and using soil amendments in the top dressing. This method is being used at
some golf courses on a consistent basis with some successful results.
Obviously, this is not a miracle surgery. But, over a period of time, could make improvements to
most of the course. Even with this method there are concems that improvements might not be
realized on our most troublesome greens. We would then be required to renovate the greens
that showed little or no improvement to the Deep Tining. By reviewing the green transition
history (the changing from rye to bermuda) for the last three years, we can predict the number
of greens that deep tining might not improve to be 3 to 4 greens. In an effort to help these
greens along, we would close them for an 8 week period during the summer. By the end of
September 1999, we should have a good idea on how much work would be necessary in the
1999-2000 Budget year.
e
e
This is how we would! implement this proposal:
. Hire a contractor specializing in green renovation.
. Schedule a date for the construction of putting/chipping green and deep tine aerifing.
. Plan to close 4 on course greens and the putting/chipping green for 8 weeks. (All holes
will remain open with the use of temporary greens).
Method of renovatiorn:
. Deep tine aerify all greens.
. Renovate 4 weakest greens and putting/chipping greens.
Financial Impact
Putting/chipping green renovation is
$ 20,000
30,000
50,000
15,000
11.000
$ 126,000
Renovation of 4 on course greens is
Forecasted loss of revenue is
Deep Tining and materials is
Contingency for project is
Total forecasted Financial Impact
Method of financing:
. Generate the same $60,000 in capital funds as in Proposal!.
. Obtain the remaining $55,000 from the funds set aside for the clubhouse, similar to that
in Proposal!.
e
e
Advantages I Disadvantages of the two Proposals
Listed below are identified advantages and disadvantages for each of the two proposals.
Proposal I Advantages
. The renovation of all greens would be completed at the same time, allowing the
complete golf course to have a "reopening" which could be used as a marketing
opportunity.
. The golfers would only be inconvenienced for one season.
. All greens would be consistent for golfers and maintenance procedures.
. Dwarf Tif Bermuda grass will create a better putting surface.
. Number of rounds would improve in a shorter period of time.
Proposal I Disadvanftages
. More funds are necessary this fiscal year.
Proposal II Advantages
. Less funds would be necessary this fiscal year.
Proposal II Disadvantages
. The golf course would not be completely open this summer and probably next summer.
. The golfers would more than likely be inconvenienced for two seasons.
. The greens would be inconsistent. Some greens would be Dwarf Tif Bermuda and some
would be 328 Bermuda. This would cause problems in two areas:
1. Golfers would not be happy because their method of putting would have to
change from green to green.
2. Maintenance costs would increase because the greens would require two
methods of maintenance.
. Rounds would not improve until all of the greens are in place and consistent.
:..
e
e
Current !Financial Condition of the Golf Course Funds
Attached as Exhibit D is a Statement of Changes in Working Capital for the Golf Course
from its opening until September 30, 1998. When reviewing it, you will notice that the
Golf Course lost $84,000 in 1997 and $157,657 in 1998.
There are several important points to consider when reviewing the financial history of
the Golf Course Fund.
First, 1996 was an extremely dry and pleasant year. It never froze that year and the
winter months were perfect weather to play golf. It was probably the biggest winter we
have ever had. That year saw revenues higher than ever before.
Because of the tremendous revenue year in 1996, we increase the transfer from the
Golf Course Fund to the Debt Service Fund from $110,000 to $250,000. Since we had
a tremendous increase in this expense category, when we had a normal winter in 1997,
it had a really bad impact on our financial condition. Our revenues were back to normal
and our expenses were up.
The transfer from the Golf Course Fund was reduced from $250,000 to $200,000 in
1998 and further reduced to $150,000 in 1999.
So far in 1999, the revenues at the golf course are below the 1998 amounts, meaning
that 1999 may be worse than 1998.
Recommendation
Based on the information provided, staff recommends that the City of La Porte proceed
with Proposal I, which is to close all greens for an 8 to 9 week period and replace all of
the grass with Dwarf Tif Bermuda.
We believe this step will allow us to return the Bay Forest Golf Course to the level it
once held as being one of the better municipal courses in the area.
e
e
SUPPORTING EXH~BITS
A Actual Rounds P~ayed
B Rounds & Revenues, Summer months
C Financial Activity
o Financial Report
e
e
EXHIBIT A
e
e
50,113
57,621
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
U)
c
Z
:J
0
It:
30,000
20,000
10.000
97-98
94-95
e
e
EXHIBIT B
e
e
Rounds and Revenue
June - August
1996-1998
Month Rounds Revenue
June 1996 5,976 $104,192
July 1996 6,059 $105,422
August 1996 5,185 $86,519
Totals 17,220 $296,133
June 1997
5,873
5,974
5,818
17,665
$101,285
$105,722
$106,026
$313,033
July 1997
August 1997
Totals
June 1998
4,876
4,891
4,346
14,113
$90,954
$89,430
$78,016
$258,400
July 1998
August 1998
Totals
Averages
16,332
$289,188
e
e
EXHIBIT C
e
e
97 -98
Golf - Actual Activity
89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97
Fiscal Year
- - - - -
- Revenues ~ Expenses ~ Ending Balance ~ Ending Bal - With CIP Reserve
1,400,000
1,200,000
,000,000
800,000
l!!
.!!
'0
c
600,000
400,000
200.000
88-89
o
.
EXHIBIT 0
e
Bay Forest Golf Course, City of La Porte
Statement of Changes in Working Capital
For the Periods Ending September 30
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
915,907
513,557
339,314
60,356
53,229
47,029
,013,485
000,341
559,762
369,831
52,022
57,198
52,915
,091,728
827,545
567,571
400,304
67,761
60,759
51,489
147.884
754,699
539,270
365,023
811
534,014
325,002
711
559,203
551,480
324,040
432,673
516,126
343,414
106
477,924
337,923
264
183,903
434,697
274,925
(69,276)
475,436
281,447
o
59,996
36,884
Beginning Working Capital
Operating Revenues:
Green Fees
Cart Rental
Tournaments
Concessions
Other
Total
Ie
161,698
,065,991
170,486
,029,502
125,483
,001,003
142,500
,002,040
136,555
952,402
88,013
797,635
52,757
809,640
1,500
98,380
673,775
117,858
204,461
23,380
,019,474
654,146
94,063
209,966
23,372
981.547
543,241
122,989
202,220
48,626
917,076
533,560
91,699
180,598
111,576
917,433
520,668
90,371
213,649
67,497
892,185
500,640
91,688
158,149
98,791
849,268
490,174
73,537
185,441
118,348
867,500
423,105
66,982
187,702
87,972
765,761
396,285
92,278
117,810
130,906
737,279
334,741
63,106
158,044
2,182
558,073
114,110
34,322
27,086
o
175,518
Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Personal Services
Supplies
Other Services & Charges
Capital Purchases
Total Operating Expenses
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)
Interest Income (Expense)
48,332
o
o
200,000
(200,000)
55,385
988
51
43,807
o
(19,519)
100,000)
(119,519)
37,683
o
(32,112)
100,000)
(132,112)
40,723
o
(39,850)
o
(39,850)
27,240
o
(35,250)
o
(35,250)
20,283
14,042
(52,399)
o
(38,357)
19,847
o
o
o
o
,612
o
o
o
o
38)
10,000
o
o
10,000
(2,
Operating Transfers:
Transfer In
Transfer to General Fund
Transfer to Debt Service Fund
Total Operating Transfers
e
Total increase (decrease)
Working Capital
172,796
72,846
42,888
152,608
126,530
168,567
80,203
253,179
758,250
915,907
,000,341
827,545
754,699
811
711
559,203
432,673
264,106
183,903
(69,276)
Ending Working Capital
368,000
348,129
329,200
160.000
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Capital Expansion
Less Reserve for
390,250
140
567,778
211
141
267
671
667,545
266
754,699
309
711,811
306
559,203
235
432,673
206
264,106
131
183,903
120
(69,276)
Working Capital after Reserve
Operating Working Capital
Days of
e
:MEETING HANDOUTS
e
~Reliant
", EnerB'frM
Entex
e
Doyle W. McQuillan
Vice President and Division Manager
South Texas and Texas Coast Divisions
e
P.O. Box 310471
New Braunfels. TX 78131-0471
Voice: 8306436917
Fax: 830 625 0400
February 5, 1999
Honorable Mayor and City Officials
City of La Porte
City Hall
La Porte, Texas
DedI' nOllurable J:\lIayor ana City Officials:
At approximately 1 p.m. on February 2, Houston Industries Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Don Jordan announced that the
company is changing its name to Reliant Energy. In accordance with this change, the name of Entex will become Reliant Energy-
Entex.
The name change is the culmination of a strategy adopted in the early 1990s to transform Houston Industries into a leading national
and international energy services company. As a result of the successful execution of this strategy, our company has grown
dramatically. Five years ago, HI was primarily a regional electric utility serving 1.4 million customers in the Houston area with a
limited presence in Latin America. Today, we serve nearly 4 million electric and gas customers in six states and own interests in
international utilities that serve 9.5 million customers.
Progress like this is always accompanied by change. The Houston Industries name no longer reflected the scale or scope of our
capabilities. In addition, the names of our subsidiary companies, many acquired during the NorAm merger in 1997, did not
communicate a unified brand identity.
And so, after 132 years in the energy business, our reputation has become our name. Reliant Energy conveys the quality of service
and credibility that helped our organization become the fourth largest combination electric and gas company in the U.S, Our
corporate headquarters, of course, will remain in Houston and we will continue our tradition of providing outstanding service to all
of our customers. This change will have no impact on our presence in the Entex operating area in the states of Texas, Louisiana, and
Mississippi. It will also not affect customer service or rates. Chang~s in building signage, stationery and automobile decals will be
phased-in over a period of' time to control costs within existing budgets.
We are sending this letter because we wanted to let you know about this change as quickly as possible. Should you have questions,
please feel free to call Brian Ferguson at 281-471-4333.
Sincerely,
)).;-2J1 m~~~!!::~m~~.~
.' . ..- ..... 1._.' Of' ",. j..' t
_'1:;~.:'~~~~~...~:';.:~: FEB 0 8 199~ '
CITY SECRETARY'S
--_.._._.,,~---- -.-- _a..._.-_ OFFICE
e
~Reliant
", Energ}'rM
Entex
e
Doyle W. McQuillon
Vice President and Division Manager
South Texas and Texas Coast Divisions
P.O. Box 310471
New Braunfels. TX 78131-0471
Voice: 8306436917
Fax: 830 625 0400
February 5, 1999
Honorable Mayor and City Officials
City of La Porte
City Hall
La Porte, Texas
iJear nUllul.lluic: ~14YOi and City Officials:
At approximately 1 p.m. on February 2, Houston Industries Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Don !~!6~ ~0"n~f'd th:
company is changing its name to Reliant Energy. In accordance with this change, the name of Entex wi!! becc!!!e Re1!~!!t E!!l
Entex.
The name change is the culmination ofa strategy adopted in the early 19905 to transform Houston Im:lu"ui~:> ~~~;;. ~ :~~-':--.;. -
and international energy services company. As a result of the successful execution of this strategy, our company has ~
dramatically. Five years ago, HI was primarily a regional electric utility serving 1.4 million customers in the nUU:lLUU ...~.. ,
limited presence in Latin America. Today, we serve nearly 4 million electric and gas customers in six states and own intere
international utilities that serve 9.5 million customers.
Progress like this is always accompanied by change. The Houston Industries name no longer reflected the scale or scope l
capabilities. In addition, the names of our subsidiary companies, many acquired during the NorAm merger in 1997, di
communicate a unified brand identity.
.."
,'.
And so, after 132 years in the energy business, our reputation has become our name. Reliant Energy conveys the quality of s
and cred1bility that helped our organization become the fourth largest combination electric and gas company in the U.~
corporate headquarters, of course, will remain in Houston and we will continue our tradition of providing outstanding servicl
of our customers. This change will have no impact on our presence in the Entex operating area in the states of Texas, Louisial
Mississippi. It wiII also not affect customer service or rates. Changes in building signage, stationery and automobile decals
phased-in over a period of' time to control costs within existing budgets.
We are sending this letter because we wanted to let you know about this change as quickly as possible. Should you have que~
please feel free to call Brian Ferguson at 281-471-4333.
Sincerely,
)k;-2Il 'm~~_!!cf}jL(
~ ',.._ t_: ~.~ p \1./ r -"'\
4" ........ ~. .. ..
I .
/} d.g-~l1 .
-\.,.l .... ,. .. ~ __.. .~ .... .."'.. ....\..-
-....... ~. --' ....... ... _....~.....:....-
FEB 0 8 1999
CITY SECRETARY'S
OFFICE
SENT BY:
2- 8-99 2:53PM ABRAMSSCOTT&BICKLEY-
. e
2818421839:# 2/ 2
ABRAMS SCOTT at BICKLEY. L.L.P.
CHASE TOVllER
4SOO TPAVIS. SUIT. ....
HousTON. TExAs 17002-3007
RAMON Go VlADA III
,7131 _.--
80ARD ~&,","ED CIVIL. APPELLAl'E ....W
T""'" _..RD 0" LIIGI_ _NC'Il",,,..,',aN
'l'ELEPHONI! (7t 3) .....-01
ftutCOPlIE.. C7.31....-
February 8. 1999
To: fY1~(/L ANJ ~~ cOCt..~~
ftl.:~ I
thl'fi, ; \ jO\)J ~cwoJ .
BY TELECOPY
Mr. Robert HCITCI8
City Manager
r.a Porte City Han
604 West Fuirmont Pal'kway
La. Porte. Texa.~ 17572
Rc:
Deal' Bob:
Weare pleased to announce that the Court has granted a take l10thing summary j udgll1~nt in
favor of all of me Defemllants in this case. Tbis means that the Cily aml tbe individual city officials
have won the cac;;c at the trial court level.
Barry Abl'ams earlier faxed to Louis Rigby a copy oflhe c.owt's February 5. 1999 Qpiuion
and Final Judgment, which were tonnal1y entered by the Court Clerk today. As Barry has pointed
oul in his covel'leUer to Louis, ifT~indsey decides to appeal this decision, she must file her notice
of appeal within thirty days from today, or em or before March 10. 1999.
We will continue to keep you advised of any new developments. In the meantime, if you or
any of 1he others intcl1:sted in this matter have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Ramo