Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-15-1991 Meeting• LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHORITY MINUTES JANUARY 15, 1991 1. 2. The meeting was call ed to order at 6:00 P. M. by President Jerry Bramlett. MEMBERS PRESENT: President Wadsworth, Members-Elect B1 ackwel l Jerry Bramlett, Member Mike Albert Fields and Robert MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Herrera, General Manager; Jeff Litchfield, Director of Finance; Steve Gillett, Director of Public Works; Dale Conger, Espey, Huston & Associates; and Buddy Jacobs, Assistant Director of Public Works The Oath of Office was administered to Albert Fields and Robert Blackwell by President Jerry Bramlett. 3. The minutes from the July 10, 1990, regular meeting were read. Member Mike Wadsworth made motion to approve the minutes as presented, seconded by President Jerry Bramlett, with Members AI Fields and Robert Blackwell abstaining. Motion was unanimous. 4. AI Fields made motion to place Jerry Bramlett in nomination as President, seconded by Mike Wadsworth. Motion was unanimous. President Jerry Bramlett made motion to nominate Mike Wadsworth as Vice President, seconded by Al Fields. Motion was unanimous. Bnb Blackwell nominated Al Fields as Secretary-Treasurer, seconded by Mike Wadsworth. Motion was unanimous.. Discussion was held concerning the frequency of meetings. They are normal l y held monthly; however, since the construction phase is virtually complete it is anticipated that meetings will probably be held once every two to three months. 5. Catch-up payment to the City of Houston in the amount of X74, 147. 80 was discussed. Bob Herrera discussed the procedure for payment processing; after determining the charges were accurate, pre-payment was made in order to avoid back charges and penalties, and to maintain a good payment record. Steve Gillett discussed the City of Houston's spreadsheet, including the portions of ownership of the plant, water usage, water rates, etc. Motion to approve catch-up payment was made by AI Fields and seconded by Mike Wadsworth. Motion was unanimous. LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHDRITY PAGE TWO 6. The annual La Porte Area Water Authority financial statements audit was discussed. Jeff Litchfield discussed the audit figures with the Board, and answered several questions. Motion to approve the audit as presented was made by Mike Wadsworth, seconded by AI Fields. Motion was unanimous. 7. Dale Conger discussed the status of the construction. The contractor is finishing the project and the control systems computer is being set up. The system should be in operation within the next couple of weeks. There have been some Iast- minute problems with the telephone company lines and changes to separate and higher _grade lines. He also showed a map of the distribution system in place which should satisfy demands for the next 20 years. A consideration was left to install a booster station if additional capacity was required in the future. 8. Steve Gillett discussed the requirements of a bond for each Board member, which becomes effective on March i, 1991. These were executed. 9. A history of the La Porte Area Water Authority was discussed by General Manager Robert Herrera. AI Fields requested several i terns be avail ab1 e for his review: budget, bond covenants, operations contract. Steve Gillett and Jeff L i tch f i e1 d wi 11 pro vide both new members with copies o f these items. 10. There being no further business, motion was made by Bob Blackwell to adjourn, seconded by Mike Wadsworth. Motion was unanimous and the meeting was adjourned at 7:27 P. M. 1 Al Fi e1 ds Secretary, Treasurer PASSED AND APrPROVED: ON THI S DAY (\~ (~,,~ ~ ~ , 19 C_ Jerry\Bra~-e7,St; Pres i den t ~ A LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHORITY AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHORITY TO BE HELD TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 1991, IN THE FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, 2963 NORTH 23RD STREET, LA PORTS, TEXAS, BEGINNING AT 6:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE TO AL FIELDS AND ROBERT BLACKWELL. 3. APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE JULY 10, 1990 MEETING. 4. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. S. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF PAYMENT OF CITY OF HOUSTON "CATCH-UP" IN THE AMOUNT OF X74,147.80. 6. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF LA PORTS WATER AUTHORITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT YEARS ENDED 1989-1990. 7. ENGINEER'S REPORT. 8. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT. 9. BRIEF HISTORY AND STATUS REPORT OF LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHORITY. 10. ADJOURNMENT. • OATH OF OFFICE I, ROBERT BLACKWELL, DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR (OR AFFIRM), THAT I WILL FAITHFULLY AND IMPARTIALLY EXECUTE THE DUTIES IMPOSED UPON ME BY LAW AS A MEMBER OF THE LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY BOARD, AND I FURTHERMORE SOLEMNLY SWEAR (OR AFFIRM), THAT I HAVE NOT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY PAID, OFFERED, OR PROMISED TO CONTRIBUTE ANY MONEY OR VALUABLE THING, OR PROMISED ANY PUBLIC OFFICE EMPLOYMENT, AS A REWARD TO SECURE MY APPOINTMENT. SO HELP ME GOD. SIGNATURE DATE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, BY THE SAID ROBERT BLACKWELL, THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1991, TO CERTIFY WHICH WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE. NOTARY PUBLIC • L7ATH C]F" C]F'I=' I is E I , AL_L;EF:"C F" I ELDS, DG SOLEMh1L`l SWEAf~: ~: OFr: AF"F` I F:M :? , "C'HA"C I l,- ): t_[_ h A I THF"ULLY AI`aD I i`1F'AF:T I tal_LY [~;{I =i_ U~1'L '1"i-ii` DUTIES I h1F'C~!~3LD U1='GhJ MI'w FsY LAW AS A MEt~IE~EF: OF "C'HE LA F'CjF:TE AF:EA LJATEG~: AU"fHCJF:IT'~( UOAf~::D. A~IIi I 1= UIr:°I"1-IE_[~:t°1i~~1~:E :~,GLiri~haf_`~( Sbd[~A1~: t: i~1r: AF"F~ i l~:i"I :? , '1"HAT T HA~?E hll7T D 11~:[Mi=:1"i.._Y OF: I NL""~ I F:EI:"I"L_Y F'A I D, ClF"F•EF:EI'i, QF: F'F:'C1M I SE:D TC1 i::QI~dT'F: T EiUTE AhaY ~'IC?hl[:~Y i~1=: V(`,LUt~E;LE '1"!-i I iVi~, Oi?: F'h::Gh1:[ :3ED tahaY F'UC l._ I i_ tai= 1= I i::E E1~1F'LOYMEi'~a'!" q ,y::::~ ~-~ F:EblAIT:I) TG SEC: UF:E t~iY AF'F'C) I ha"I"t'IE«'ha'T' . SCI HEL.F' t~lE i~GD . S I t-~hlA'TUF~:E ~..`~Yi ~ 1.- SUEjS?=~1T::[ S~EL'~ i~ti~1D SL•!C]F:h! TCJ D1EF"CJt?:E 1"I[T. !~s`{ 1"I-iE :3A I U' f-~i_hlTi~:'" 1' I i_I._=~:_;. 7~1-i I `~ THE 15TH DA`s OF" JAhaUt1F~:'; , 1'u'~ ~. , TCl ~i=:EF~:l..1: F"'~( L•!H 1 i=:H W I -['haE:~C~u ~~IY HAhaD Ahal~~ SEAL OF' ui=l= I~~E. i'dt~l"Ai~:Y F'UGL:[i - ~ ~ ~ G! IG 17 1990 ~~iJl ~~ CITY OF L.A PORTE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM AUGUST 16, 1990 T0: Steve Gillett, Public Works Director FROM: Robert T. Herrera, City Manager SUBJECT: City of Houston - Quarterly Payment (LPAWA~~t Please process the payment requested from the City of Houston for LPAWA's share of the capital costs for the Southeast Water Purification Plant in the amount of $74,147.80. Place this request on the first available LPAWA board meeting where a quorum can be present. RTH/ms / ~~d ~ ~l ~~~~~~j'~a t ~ i ~~ 9 ~~'J' Post Office Box 1562 Houston, Texas 77251-1562 Kathryn J. Whitmire, Mayor CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Larry McKaskle Ernest MCGowen, Sr. Vince Ryan Alfred J. Calloway Frank O. Mancuso John G. Goodner Christin Hartung Dale M. Gorczynski Ben T. Reyes Beverley Clark Eleanor Tinsley Jim Greenwood Sheila Jackson Lee Judson Robinson, Jr. CITY CONTROLLER: George Greanias S~la~ dir. Robert T. Herrera General Manager LaPorte Area Water Authority P.O. Box 1115 LaPorte, Texas 77571 August 1, 1990 Subject: Cost Sharing Water Project Contract No. 27680 Southeast Water Purification Plant Dear dir. Herrera: rt RECEIVED AUG 0 6 1990 CITY }vi,~i`Jr~~LRS QFFIC~ Enclosed for your information is a copy of our current spreadsheet used for calculating allocated cost on the Southeast Plant Project. LaPorte Area Water Authority's "catch-up" as of June 30, 1990 is $74,147.80. If you have any questions, please contact Harish Roopani at 247-3012. Sincerely, JJB:HR:ml Attachment xc: R, Dale J. Taylor ohn J. ~ Baldwin Deputy Assistant Director Department of Public Utilties doc#0023Q/8 SOUTHEAST WATER PURIFICA7IO~ANT Preliminary Cost Allocation Cost Element Total Cost Production Pumping Total To Date MULT 1 MOLT 2 Cost MULT 1 MULT 2 Cost 6/30/90 Raw Water Supply 96 in pipeline Design 52,055,288.68 1.00 0.32 $657,692.38 0.00 0.00 50.00 Acquisition 5869,382.58 1.00 0.32 5278,202.43 0.00 0.00 50.00 Construction 511,317,830.50 1.00 0.32 53,621,705.76 0.00 0.00 50.00 Pumps & Connections Design 5243,145.00 1.00 0.35 585,689.87 0.00 0.00 50.00 Construction 55,086,887.49 1.00 0.35 51,792,735.68 0.00 0.00 50.00 Subtotal Rau Water 519,572,534.25 56,436,026.11 50.00 56,436,026.11 Treatment Plant Land Acquisition 56,560,790.00 0.73 0.11 5510,866.85 0.27 0.11 5188,950.75 Site Cleanup 51,149,371.99 0.73 0.00 50.00 0.27 0.00 50.00 Engineering Preliminary Phase 5620,409.93 0.73 0.11 548,309.25 0.27 0.11 517,867.81 Siting Study 5145,659.80 0.73 0.11 511,342.04 0.27 0.11 54,195.00 Final Design 160 mgd 56,274,003.91 0.73 0.50 52,290,011.43 0.27 0.50 5846,990.53 Final Design 80 mgd 51,477,870.49 0.73 1.00 51,078,845.46 0.27 1.00 5399,025.03 Construction Phase Svc s 5692,670.40 0.73 1.00 5505,649.39 0.27 1.00 5187,021.01 Construction Base Amount Earned 566,907,009.44 0.73 1.00 548,842,116.89 0.27 1.00 518,064,892.55 Change Orders 5156,636.10 0.73 1.00 5114,344.35 0.27 1.00 342,291.75 138K Electric Line 51,695,900.00 0.73 0.11 5132,054.08 0.27 0.11 548,841.92 Salary Recovery -PW 348,179.97 0.73 1.00 5254,171.38 0.27 1.00 594,008.59 Force main 265,362.86 0.73 1.00 5193,714.89 0.27 1.00 571,647.97 Construction Mgmt Inspection/Testing/CM 55,079,992.56 0.73 1.00 53,708,394.57 0.27 1.00 51,371,597.99 Subtotal Plant 591,373,857.45 557,689,820.58 521,337,330.90 579,027,151.48 TOTAL PLANT + RAW 5110,946,391.70 564,125,846.69 521,337,330.90 585,463,177.59 La Porte Area Water Autho rity: 53,366,b06.95 3497,159.81 Distribution Prelim Engineering 51,132,802.00 Final Design 51,853,728.85 Construction 521,785,970.37 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION 524,772,501.22 La Porte Area Water Authority Distribution: La Porte Area Water Authority total share: GRAND TOTAL 5135,718,892.92 MULT 3 MULT 2 0.45 0.11 556,073.70 0.45 0.33 5278,059.33 0.45 0.33 53,267,895.56 NOTES: 1. Peak plant capacity 80 mgd; peak pumping capacity 225 mgd. 2. Assumes ultimate construction of 750 mgd plant. 3. MULT 1 = Production/Pumping Allocation Factor (73/27) MULT 2 = Cost allocated to this project in context of overall SEWPP project. MOLT 3 = Distance Allocation on Distribution Pipeline (B/D in Sec 4.08) 4. FINAL PROJECT COSTS TO BE BASED ON ACTUAL EXPENDITURES. 5. COSTS ACCUMULATED TILL JUNE 90 $3,602,028.58 50.00 33,863,766.76 ---------------- ---------------- • • Summary JUNE 30, 1990 La Porte --------------- Production 3,366,606.95 Pumping 497,159.81 Distribution 0.00 --------------- Total Share: 3,863,766.76 Paid to Date: 3,789,618.96 --------------- "CATCH-UP" 74,147.80 --------------- --------------- The La Porte Area Water Authority (LPAWA) was created by an act of the Texas Legislature to ensure an adequate supply of surface water for the Bayshore Area, in response to a mandate by the Harris- Galveston Coastal Subsidence District to convert to surface water by 1990. The Authority, after approval by voters, in 1982, began work on a plan to supply surface water. Various alternatives were investigated, and by 1985, it appeared that a plant built and operated by the Authority was the most cost-effective alternative. Also during this period, potential water customers were contacted, and interest was expressed by the Cities of La Porte, Morgan's Point, Seabrook and Shoreacres, along with Bayshore Municipal Utility District (Bay MUD) and Water Control Improvement District No. 50. Projected water demands were obtained, and cost estimates were prepared to reflect total cost, as well as each individual entity's cost. Availability of raw water at this time presented no problem, and the Authority began contract negotiations with the proposed customers for surface water supply. In April 1986, the City of Houston announced the proposed construction of the South East Water Purification Plant near Ellington Air Force Base. Due to this investment, and the probable need to examine future raw water needs for Houston within ten years, Houston could offer only a ten year contract for the purchase of raw water to the Authority. The Authority could, however, purchase capacity at the proposed Southeast Plant for its surface water needs. The Authority began examining the costs of purchasing capacity at the Southeast Plant, as well as participating with Deer Park in their proposed plant. Cost analysis indicated the City of Deer Park option had a substantially higher cost than the Houston Plant and the original Authority Plant, which were comparable. The Authority decided that the most cost effective option was to negotiate a contract with the City of Houston to purchase capacity at the Southeast Plant, and construct transmission facilities to deliver surface water to customers. The City of Seabrook, along with WCID No. 50 indicated that it would be more cost effective for their surface water needs to be met by direct dealings with Houston, or through the City of Pasadena. The remainder of the Authority's customers committed to the purchase of surface water through the Authority, and the Authority began contract negotiations with the City of Houston for purchase of capacity at the Southeast Plant. • The Authority investigated various funding sources, and determined the Texas Water Development Board would provide the most cost effective funding source. The necessary requirements were pursued while contract negotiations continued with the Authority's customers and the City of Houston. Additionally, the Authority received proposals from several engineering firms to design the necessary transmission system. The firm of Espey, Huston & Associates was selected, and began design. The contract with the City of Houston to purchase capacity at the Southeast Plant was finalized in December 1987. The Engineer completed plans and specifications during the following year, as the Authority acquired the necessary easements for construction. Bids for construction of the transmission system were received in January 1989, and construction began in March by the successful bidder, Mercer Construction Company. The Southeast Water Purification Plant, scheduled for completion October 1989, was delayed until October 1990. This in turn delayed Mercer Construction Company. Upon receipt of water, the Authority began finalizing the transmission system. Additional telemetry problems with the phone system have been solved, and the La Porte Area Water Authority will soon be supplying treated surface water to the Bayshore area, as envisioned almost ten years ago. La i'orte AreaW~t~rAuthorit y PHONE (71 3) 471 -5020 • P. O. Box 1 1 1 5 • LA PORTE. TEXAS 77572- 1 1 1 5 ~~ ~ v ~/ `. ~ ., . -~ _ . , R January 8 , 1991 Jgly ~ rg9t La Porte Area Water Authority Ci i~Y t~gNgCERS Jerry Bramlett, President ~~F{~E Mike Wadsworth, Director Al Fields, Director Elect Robert Blackwell, Director Elect Enclosed is a draft copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the La Porte Area Water Authority for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1990. The report was prepared by the Authorities auditing firm, KPMG Peat Marwick. It was based on data that was compiled by the City of La Porte. This draft will be replaced by the official report, which will be given to you at the January 15, 1991 meeting. There should be no changes in any number in the report. I have reviewed the report and agree with all numerical aspects of the report. The La Porte Area Water Authority ended the year in excellent financial position. One item which will be of interest to you is the fund equity. We started the year with a fund equity of -$139,600 and ended the year with a positive fund equity of $894,583. A major component of the shift of fund equity was the capitalization of interest expense. Governmental Accounting Principals allow for the capitalization of part of the interest expense on monies borrowed to finance a project as long as the project is in progress. In the fiscal year just ended, we capitalized $743,384 in interest expense. I will attend the January 15, 1991 meeting and will be available to answer any questions you might have. Sincerely J f tchfield, CPA irector of Finance xc: `/obert T. Herrera, General Manager Steve Gillett, Director of Public Works • • La Porte Area Water Authority Financial Statements and Supplementary Information September 30, 1990 and 1989 (With Independent Auditors' Reports Thereon) • • LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY , ~ ~ : M : ,;, . ` _, . ; _. t~~. Table of Contents i=or :.~i~;:u~~.;:,r; ;= _ ~..~ __ Independent Auditors' Report __ Schedule and Exhibit References Per accompanying financial statements Per Texas Department and supplementary of Water information Resources Manual` Exhi it Schedule Financial Statements: A 1 Balance Sheets -All Funds Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Accumulated Deficit - B ~ All Proprietary Fund Types Statements of Cash Flows -All C ~ Proprietary Fund Types 6 Notes to Financial Statements _ the ule Schedule Supplementary Information: Analysis of Changes in Cash E and Temporary Investments N/A Long-term Debt Service Requirements F by Years Analysis of Changes in Long-term Debt l ~ G H Schedule of Temporary Investments 3 I Analysis of Taxes Receivable N/A J Analysis of Organizational Costs N/A Analysis of Changes in General NSA K Fixed Assets Schedule of Notes Payable NSA L Comparative Schedule -Revenues and Expenditures -General Fund M and Debt Service Fund NSA ~ N Insurance Coverage Board Members, Key Personnel and O Consultants $ __, Questionnaire Completed by the P Auditors --" Certificate of the Board of _ Q Directors * These are the numbers assigned by the Texas Water Commission; they are provided for cross- reference purposes. Certain other schedules designated by the Texas Water Commission have been omitted because necessary information was not available or was included elsewhere in the accompanying financial statements and supplementary information. • • ..'fir ~\: ~. ~ _, ~C J ._,i .. .,.__ - ~~J ~_: _ ~_~ The Board of Directors La Porte Area Water Authority: Independent Auditors' Report We have audited the component unit financial statements of the La Porte Area Water Authority (Authority) as of September.30, 1990 and 1989 and for the years then ended, as listed in the accompanying table of contents. These component unit financial statements are the responsibility of the Authority's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these component unit financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the component unit financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the component unit financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the component unit financial statements (Exhibit A, B and C) referred to above present fairly in all matenal respects, the financial position of the La Pone Area Water Authority as of September 30, 1990 and 1989, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic component unit financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information presented in Schedules 1 through $ is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic component unit financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the audittng procedures applied in the audits of the basic component unit financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in relation to the basic component unit financial statements taken as a whole. December 21, 1990 • Exhibit A LA PORTE AREA ~'VATER AUTHORITY Balance Sheets ~,~~ ~ ; : ~; r ; ..-r ~ r-. ~ . ___ AlI Funds _ , , . , , September 30, 1990 and 1989 Proprietary fund type _ enter rise Assets 1 Current Assets: $ 169 5.014 Cash 94,991 - Accounts receivable Temporary investments: 1,258,649 3,244,424 Unrestricted 910,236 521,365 Restricted 9,143 13,713 Accrued interest receivable Total current assets 2,273,188 3,784.516 Land, building and equipment -construction-in-progress 8,748,511 7,169,508 Total assets $ 11,021,699 10,954,024 Liabilities and Fund Equitv Current liabilities: 000 45 - Accountspayable , 385 220 - Accrued interest payable , 731 61 1,293,624 Due to City of La Porte , Total current liabilities 327,1 I6 1,293,b24 Revenue bonds payable 9,800,000 9,800.000 Total liabilities 10,127,116 11,093,624 Fund Equitv Reserved for bond contingency 689,851 521,365 Unreserved 204,732 (660,965) Total fund equity 894,583 (139,600) Total liabilities and fund equity ~ • $ 11,021,699 10,954,024 See accompanying notes to financial statements. ~ i LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Accumulated Deficit All Proprietary Fund Types Years ended September 30, 1990 and 1989 Debt service and maintenance charges Interest income Expenses: Interest expense Other services and charges Total expenses Income (loss) before operating transfers Operating transfers out 1\Tet income (loss) Accumulated deficit at beginning of year Fund equity at end of year Exhibit B Proprietary fund type ente rise $ 1,074,068 - 143,753 227,767 138,156 227,767 5,482 1,587 143,638 229,354 1,074,183 (1,587) (40,000) - 1,034,183 (1,587) (139,600) (138,013) $ 894,583 (139,600) See accompanying notes to financial statements. • Exhibit C LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Statements of Cash Flows - All Proprietary Fund Types _,r; ~ , , ,, , • .,. ; ~~-~ Years ended September 30, 1990 and 1989 • ,, : ;~. , ~_ ~_ . .... ~ - - Proprietary fund type ente rise Net income (loss) $ 1,034,183 (1,587) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Increase in accounts receivable (94,991) 4 570 - 713) (13 Decrease in accrued interest receivable , 000 45 , (14,997) Increase in accounts payable Increase in accrued interest payable , 220,385 (7,662) Increase (decrease) in due io City of La Porte (1,231,893) 1,133,002 Total adjustments (1,056,929) 1,096,630 Net cash provided by (used for) i i i 746) (22 1,095,043 v t es operating act , Cash flows used in investing activities -capital expenditures (1,579,003) (6,805,080) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds (repayments) of short-term debt - (~ 19,160) Proceeds from issuance of long-teen debt - 9,800,000 Net cash provided by financing activities - 9,480,840 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (1,601,749) 3,770,803 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 3,770,803 - Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,169,054 3,770,803 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for interest net of amount capitalized $ 138,156 227,767 See accompanying notes to financial statements. • • LA PORTS AREA WATER AUTHORITY Notes to Financial Statements September 30, 1990 _~ ~` ~ - ~- ~ `~`~ ~ ' ~ -~ ' ~ ~_ - .. (1) Formation The La Porte Area Water Authority (the Authority) was created on May 30, 1981 by Chapter 729, page 2678, Acts of the 67th Legislature of the State of Texas. This bill authorizes the Authority to purchase, construct, or otherwise acquire waterworks systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and drainage facilities or parts of such systems or facilities and to operate and maintain such facilities. The Authority is authorized to set rates for services related to the aforementioned systems and facilities, and to issue revenue bonds for the purpose of acquiring and maintaining such systems. The Authority comprises approximately 20,600 acres in Harris County, Texas. The Authority's primary operations have consisted of purchasing an undivided interest in the Southeast Water Purification Plant (the Southeast Plant) under construcrion by the City of Houston and planning the construction of transmission and distribution systems to transport water from the Southeast Plant to the customers of the Authority. (2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the La Porte Area Water Authority: (a) Reporting Entity The financial statements of the Authority include all funds and operations which are controlled by or dependent on the Authority. The criteria considered in determining governmental activities to be reported within the Authority's financial statements include the degree of oversight responsibility exercised by the Board of Directors over an organization, activity or function, the Authority's accountability for the activity's fiscal matters, its scope of public service, and the nature of any special financing relationships which may exist between the Authority and a given governmental activity. These criteria are based upon and consistent with those promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The City of La Porte is the lowest level of government exercising oversight responsibility and controls over all activities related to the acquisition, operation, and maintenance of waterworks and sewer systems within the boundaries of the La Porte Area Water Authority. The Authority is iiScluded in the financial statements of the City of La Porte, due to the reporting entity concept as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, since the Board of Directors is appointed by the City Council of the City of La Porte, and has the ability to significantly influence operations, and primary accountability for fiscal matters. (Continued) • i ,,= .;~ LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Notes to Financial Statements (b) Basis of Presentation -Fund Accounting The operations of the Authority are recorded in an enterprise fund. Enterprise funds are used to account for operations (a) that are financed primarily through user charges, or (b) where the governing body has decided that determination of net income is appropriate. The enterprise fund is a proprietary fund type. (c) Basis of Accounting The Authority maintains an accounting system in accordance with the requirements of the Texas Department of Water Resources' Water District Accountine Manual. (d) Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Authority considers cash held in demand accounts and all short-term investments with a maturity at date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. (e) Construction-in-progress The Authority, in conformity with requirements of the Texas Water Commission, capitalizes during construction all costs incurred for construction of facilities, the issue and sale of bonds, attorney's fees, interest and some administrative expenses until acceptance or use of the revenue-producing facility has occurred. Interest capitalized during 1990 and 1989 totaled $743,384 and $18,982, respectively. (3) Cash and Temporary Investments The Authority holds its cash and temporary investments separately in each of its funds. Following is a description of the Authority's investment policies and the n~pes of insurance and collateral maintained on cash and temporary investments. Statutes o~ the State of Texas and policies mandated by the Authority's Board of Directors authorize the Authority to invest only in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, certificates of deposit issued by local financial institutions or money market accounts with local financial institutions. -. As of September 30, 1990 and 1989, the ~4nthority had total cash and temporary investments of $2,169,054 and $3,770,803, respectively. Of this total $169 and $5,014, was covered by federal depository insurance and $2,168,885 and $3,765,789, respectively by collateral held at the Federal Reserve Bank at Houston and in third-party banks' trust departments in the Authority's name. Temporary investments included $500,598 and $286,489 of pooled investments with the Authority's oversight unit, the City of La Pone. (Continued) • • LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Notes to Financial Statements (4) Provision for Income Taxes The Authority is an organization described in Internal Revenue Code Section 115 and no tax provision is necessary in regard to its excess revenue. (5) Southeast Water Purification Plant The Authority and the City of Houston have entered into a Cost Sharing Water Project Contract (the Contract) wherein the Authority, the Cities of La Porte, Morgan's Point and Shoreacres, Bayshore Municipal Utility District, and other participants agree to jointly finance the construction and operation of the Southeast Water Purification Plant. Under the terms of the Contract, the Authority will purchase 4.2 million gallons per day production and 5.25 million gallons per day pumping capacity. The Cities of La Porte, Morgan's Point and Shoreacres~and Bayshore Municipal Utility District have agreed to demand and pumping allocations of the Authority's purchase of water from the Southeast Plant. The required funds for the undivided interest in the Southeast Plant and the construction of a transmission and distribution system to transport water from the Southeast Plant are provided by the issuance of $9.8 million revenue bonds. The water rate to be set by the Authority will at all times be not less than an amount sufficient to provide for payment of all expenses in producing, treating and pumping the water in connection with the transmission and distribution systems, and to provide payment for the interest and principal of all bonds when and as the same shall become due and payable. (Continued) LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Notes to Financial Statements (6) Bonds Payable On Mazch 7, 1988 (amended epsl 12Acts of the 67th LLegislature of thBStateooflTexas~rRegular Sessionty1981 andeChapter 54 of the Te~OW~ater Codeg~ ~S ptcmber 30~ 990, all of these . with Chapter 729, page 2,678 eq bonds had been issued. The bonds are payable from the net revenues of the Authority. The bonds are in $5,000 denominations. Interest on all bonds is payable on June ]and December 1 o eac yeaz to maturity. The following is a summary of other information relative to bonds outstanding: Callable on Principal Ori~a1 Total Issuance Matttrity date interest paymen[ amount issue outstanding at Interest ~,>atLnin,R engine datac beemnme ~~ll;lblti Series am4.td01 September 0__1990 [;~ ~ Series 1988 $5,000,000 5,000,000 4.95% to 7.05% November 1, 1988 December 1, 19918015 December 1, 1998 $5,000,000 Series II 1988 4 800.000 4,$00,000 5.15%_ to7.OS°7o December 1, 1988 December 1, 1992/L016 December 1, 1998 4,800,000 $9.800.000 9.800.000 The various bond indenture Vaon~ s s~niFicfiman~l ~itdano~~ cvc ut~°~ d ~ovuagesebThe Authonity isein compliance w th allnsuch st~tifictant futancial lirnitauons and restrictions~~ minimum amounts to be maintained to 8 The annual requirements for bonds payable as of September 30, 1990 are as follows: ti.~ Principal ~~ -*~ J - $ 661,156 ~ 1991 1992 80,000 659,175 • 1993 160,000 000 170 653,075 644,407 ~ ~ 1994 1995-1999 , 1,055,000 3,054,770 b' z 2000.2004 1,480,000 000 085 2 2,657,854 2,056,142 _ > ~ ~ 2005-2009 , , 000 915 2 1,193,731 ~ ~ , , ~ ~'~ 201-20]7 $9 800,000 11 573,564 ~, > 0 -1 • The Board of Directors La Porte Area Water Authority: • t. ,. The primary purpose of our audits of the component unit financial statements of the La Porte Area Water Authority for the year ended September 30, 1990 and 1989 was to enable us to express an opinion on the fairness of presentation of the component unit financial statements of the La Porte Area Water Authority as of and for the years then ended. Based on the information obtained during the course of our audits, we have responded to the questions contained in the accompanying questionnaire to be completed ~by the auditors. The response to question 6 should be considered as an expression of d~tsoP hould be understood that udCh audit procedures can of be relied upon to craracter of our au , disclose all instances of a noncompliance nature. REPORT DATE Note: This letter is an integral part of the responses to the questions contained in the accompanying questionnaire and must be read in connection with it. u • LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORIY Questionnaire Completed by the Auditors For the year ended September 30, 1990 ~ ;; : ; ; , _ _ _ La Porte Area Water Authority 1. At the time that your firm was engaged by the Board of Directors of the above-named water district to perform this audit, were copies of the Annual Audit Report Requirements and the Water District Accounting Manual made available to you? yeS No 2. The Water District Accounting Manual prescribes accounting methods and policies. After taking these into consideration, did the local water district: a. Maintain a proper classification of expenses and revenues? X - Yes No b . Record expenses and revenues according to GAAP and consistent with the type of accounting system utilized? X Yes N o c. Maintain the double entry system of accounting? X Yes No d. Adhere to other provisions of the Water District Accounting X .- manual? Yes No 3. Did the Board of Directors for the water district impose on your firm X any audit requirements in addition to those stated in the Annual - - Audit Report Requirements? Yes No 4. Did you identify, during the course of your examination of the financial statements of the water district, any area pertaining to accounting matters on which action should be taken by the Board of Directors of the water district? X Yes No If Yes is checked for question 4., have these topics been discussed in a management letter to the water district's Board of Directors? N / A Yes No See accompanying letter dated December 21, 1990. (Continued) 2 • LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORIY Questionnaire Completed by ;, ... the Auditors ~ -- ~ -. ~~~ ~ J _~~=~~ _ 5. Did you obtain representation from the Board of Directors of the water district that all records of the water district were made available to you X for your examination? Yes No 6. Did the water district: a. Use the Capital Projects Fund and Debt Service Fund only for purposes authorized by the Board of Directors of the water district and/or within the provisions of applicable bond resolutions? N / A Yes No b. Properly escrow the required amount of cash as prescribed by the Texas Water Commission or disburse the escrowed cash T according to the terms prescribed by the Texas Water Commission? ~ / A Yes N o c. Do business only with firms or corporations in which members of the Board of Directors had no pecuniary interest? ~` Yes No d. Observe the conditions for obtaining grants, gifts, etc., or observe agreements with governmental agencies for the purpose of securing ~ funds or services? Yes No e. Have a contract for Social Security coverage for its employees with the Social Security Division of the Texas Employees Retirement N / A System? T Yes 1\ o f . Make remittances of Social Security taxes according to the terms of the contract for Social Security coverage with the Social Security T Division of the Employees Retirement System of Texas? N / A Yes No '~ Nothing came to our attenrion during the course.of our examination which indicated that the laws are not being observed. See accompanying letter dated December 21, 1990. (Continued) 3 LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORIY . ,,. , , ~ , . 1 _, Questionnaire Completed by the Auditors ~ '; g. Deposit receipts to the proper funds kept by the approved X depository bank? Yes No h. Draw checks only on funds approved by the Board of Directors X and signed by authorized personnel? yeS No 7 . Management letter. a. The date of your most recent management letter was ~ ~ A M AMT LETTER DATE. yeS No b. Were your recommendations explained to and discussed with administrative officials of the water disu-ict? yes No c. Is there evidence indicating that the previous year's recommendations have been or are being implemented? yes No 8. The Texas Water Code makes specific provisions relating to security provided by depository banks. After consideration of the applicable laws pertaining to the specific water district, did the depository bank provide adequate security of the correct type? es 'N o Please indicate for each depository: A. (1) The name of the depository bank Ba~shore National Bank (2) Amount of FDIC coverage (if member bank) ~ 100 000 (3) Amount of bond or other security pledged as of the end of the fiscal year 2 (4) Largest cash balance $1 388 926 (5) Date of largest cash balance Qctober 1989 -- (6) The amount of bond or security pledged at the time of the largest cash balance (excluding FDIC coverage) $2 500 000 See accompanyir-g letter dated December 21, 1990. (Continued) • • 4 LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORIY - - f!,~~~ - - - Questionnaire Completed by the Auditors ~~ ~- • • -• ..- ' ~ ,~' 9. The water district's taxes were collected by an employee of the district 10. Was the tax assessor-collector bonded as required by law? 1 L What was: a. The tax assessor-collector bonded for? b. The greatest amount of the district's taxes in the tax assessor- collector'spossession at any one time? c. The frequency of tax receipts deposits with the bonded depository? (check one) (1) Daily (2) Weekly (3) Monthly 12. We (check one): a. Actually examined the records of the tax assessor-collector. b . Received written confirmation for tax data from the tax assessor-collector. c. Accepted tax data furnished by the district's administrative offices. 13. Were local tax revenues (including delinquent taxes, and interest and penalties on taxes) properly separated for debt service? N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes No 14. Was the water district in compliance with applicable bond resolutions, with the general or special legislation under which the district was created and with the specific statutes excerpted and included in the Legal Compliance Guidelines in Section 70-03-1 of--the Water District Accounting Manual? - Yes No * Nothing came to our attention during the course of our examination which indicated that the resolutions and laws were not being observed. See accompanying letter dated December 21, 1990. (Continued) • 5 LA PORTE AREA ~'VATER AUTHORIY Questionnaire Completed by the Auditors ~ _ , r, , . ; , 15. Full and complete explanations and/or references to notes, schedules (or comments in the Audit Report Letter for responses marked (*). Our accompanying letter dated DATE OF L.ET"~ER_ is an integral part of our responses in this questionnaire and must be read in connection with it. See accompanying letter dated December 21, 1990. CERTIFICATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS La Porte Area Water Authority Harris Name of Water District County We, the undersigned, do hereby certify that the audit report of the above named Water District for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1990 and 1989 was received by the Board of Directors on the th day of and was reviewed and X approved disapproved; at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Water District on the th day of Signature of Board Secretary Signature of Board President ~~dlll~ 1 LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORTTY Long-term Debt Service Requirements by Years September 30,1990 Series 1988 _ Series II 1988 Due during Interest due fiscal years Principal due December 1, in December 1. ,jgne ] . 1991 8 - 336,018 1992 80,000 334,037 1993 85,000 329,869 1994 90,000 325,272 1995 95,000 320,229 1996 105,000 314,574 1997 110,000 308,282 1998 120,000 301,350 1999 125,000 293,784 2000 135,000 285,557 2001 145,000 276,525 2002 155,000 266,697 2003 165,000 256,055 7004 180,000 244,408 2005 190,000 231,780 2006 205,000 218,200 2007 220,000 203,483 2008 235,000 187,671 2009 250,000 170,818 2010 265,000 152,921 2011 285,000 133,738 2012 305,000 113,087 2013 330,000 90,862 2014 350,000 66,975 2015 375,000 41,419 2016 400,000 14,100 2017 - - 5 5,000,000 5,817,711 Total annual requirements la 1 series Interest due Principal due December 1, Total December 1. June 1. ~41~1 336,018 414,037 414,869 415,272 415,229 419,574 a 18,282 421,350 418,784 420,557 421,525 421,697 421,055 424,408 421,780 423,200 423,483 422,671 420,818 417,921 418,738 418,087 420,862 416,975 416,419 414,100 10,817,711 75,000 80,000 85,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 115>000 120,000 130,000 140>000 150,000 160,000 170,000 185,000 195,000 210,000 225,000 240,000 255,000 275,000 295,000 315,000 335,000 360,000 385,000 4,soo,ooo 325,138 325,138 323,206 319,135 314,636 309,546 303,840 297,663 290,866 283,432 275,368 266,522 256,877 246,413 235,150 222,945 209,786 195,713 180,596 164,438 147,172 128,622 108,672 x7,244 64,331 39,833 13,571 5,935,853 661,156 739,175 813,075 814,407 814,865 x24,120 622,122 824,013 824,650 823,989 826,893 828,219 827,932 830,821 826,930 831,145 828,269 828,384 826,414 822,359 820,910 821,709 824,534 819>219 815,750 813,933 398,571 21,553,564 325,138 325,138 398,206 399,135 399,636 404,546 403,840 402,663 405,866 403,432 405>368 406,522 406,877 406,413 405,150 407,945 404,786 405,713 405,596 404,438 402,172 403,622 403,672 402,244 399,331 399,833 398,571 10,735,853 CJ ch ule 2 LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY , k ~ ~ , r ~ ~ ~, ,_ Analysis of Changes in Long-term Debt `'V`~~; J~,~~-~!'~ ` ~'~-_ ' ,-_ . _~ .. ~ .: September 30, 1990 Interest rate Dates interest payable Maturity dates Bonds outstanding at beginning of year Bonds sold during the year Retirements -principal Bonds outstanding at end of year Retirements -interest Bond ri 1 issues Series II 1988 4.95% - 7.05% 5.15% - 7.05% 6/1-12/1 6/1-12/1 12/1/91-12/1/15 12/1/92-12/1/16 $5,000,000 54,800,000 5,000,000 336,018 Paying agent's name and address: Series 1988 First City National Bank of Houston and Series II 1988 P.O. Box 809 Account X18226 Houston, TX 7 1001 4,800,000 325,138 • ch u] LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY"~ ; ~ ~_ ? ~ . ; : , : _ ~ •. Schedule of Temporary Investments - ` - ~ - - September 30, 1990 Identification Depositor number Federal Reserve Bank - Houston: U.S. Treasury Bills 912794VF18 Pooled investments - oversight unit - Accrued interest Balance receivable Interest Maturity Sept 99er 30, Sept 990r 30, dam 6.99 10/18/90 1,668,287 ._ - 500.598 X2,168,885 9.143 9,143 Schedule 4 LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Insurance Coverage September 30,1990 • Type of Policy clause From T~ Amount of coveraee Phic~number In u r corooration coinsurance T y,n of insurance Public official bond March 1,1990 March 1,1991 $5,000 -director 10083-88-8 andtGuartanty Coelity Stock No Public official bond March 1,1990 March 1,1991 $5,000 -director 10111-86 ~atGd~Sut~ey Codelity Stock No Public official bond March 1,1990 March 1,1991 $5,000 -director 10110-86 and GuaSrtan y Codelity Stock No Public official bond March 1,1990 March 1,1991 $5,000 -director 10084-88-4 andtGuasranty Coelity Stock No ~~ :,; _~ ~, r c v: ~n o Z D c ~ -~ ~ ~~ C ~ TI ~c -~ ~ ~ Schedule LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Board Members, Key Personnel and Consultants September 30, 1990 ._ . e ~ ~ ~ Complete authority mailing address: P.O. Box 1115 La Pone, Texas 77 571 District business telephone number: (713) 471-5020 Term of office elected and expires Fees and salaries year ended Title at Resident Name and address or date hired ~e.~ember 30. 1990 year-end of district Board Members: Jerry Brainlett October 1990 None President Yes 718 South Kansas September 1991 La Porte, TX 77571 Vacant* August 1989 None Secretary/ Yes September 1990 Treasurer Vacant* August 1987 September 1989 None Vice President Yes Mike Wadsworth October 1990 10347 Shellrock September 1991 La Porte, TX 77571 Kev Administrative Personnel: None Director Yes Robert Herrera ~ Salary paid General Yes 9723 Stonemont by City of Manager La Pone, TX 77571 La Porte * Mr. Graves & Mr. Matthews resigned during the year. Their replacements have been appointed by the cities but they have not been sworn in as of yet. Theca replacements are Al Fields and Robert Blackwell. (Continued) Schedule 5. Cont. LA PORTE AREA WATER AUTHORITY Board Members, Key Personnel and Consultants,_ __ Terns of office elected Fees and salaries and expires year ended Title at Resident Name and address or date hired September 30. 1990 year-end_ of istrict Consultants: Espey/Huston Engineers, Inc. IvT/A 574,730 Engineers N/A 888 West Belt Dnve South Suite 200 Houston, TX 77042 KPMG Peat Marwick N/A 4,500 Auditors N/A 1 Corporate Plaza 2525 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX 77058 Attorneys: John Armstrong N/A 808 Attorneys N/A Askins & Armsvong, P.C. Attorneys at Law 702 W. Fairmont Parkway La Porte, TX 77572 Baker & Botts N/A - Attorneys N/A 910 Louisiana One Shell Plaza Houston, TX 77002 Moroney Beissner & Co. N/A - Financial N/A Suite 1865, Post Oak Central consultant s 2000 Post Oak Boulevard Houston, TX 77056