HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-22-07 Special Called Meeting of the La Porte Development Corporation Board of Directors Minutes
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 22, 2007
1. Call to Order
President Pat Muston called the meeting to order at 5:02 p. m.
Members Present: 4B Development Board - Bill Love, Chuck Engelken, Tommy Moser,
Mike Clausen, Ed Matuszak, Pat Muston and Trent Wise
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Interim City Manager John Joerns, City Secretary Martha Gillett and
Assistant to the City Manager Crystal Scott, Controller Phyllis Rinehart, Assistant City
Attorney Clark Askins, Intern Mike Stokes,
Others Present: Consultivo Consultant Representatives were in attendance.
2. Motion was made by Board Member Engelken to approve the Minutes of January 8, 2007
Joint Special Called Regular Meeting of La Porte Development Corporation Board and City
Council. Second by Board Member Clausen. Motion carried unanimously,
Ayes: Bill Love, Ed Matuszak, Pat Muston, Trent Wise, Mike Clausen, Chuck Engelken and
Tommy Moser.
Nays: None
Abstain: None
3. Public Hearing - The 4b Development Corporation received an overview from Interim City
Manager John Joerns regarding the expenditure of funds related to a new manufacturing
center to be established near the intersection of Fairmont Parkway and South Sixteenth
Street and Zoned Light Industrial. See attached Exhibit A the slide show presentation.
Over a 10 year period the estimated revenue is as follows:
City - $1,059,250
4B $423,700
Public Input - None
Close Public Hearing - the Public Hearing was closed at 5: 11 p.m.
4. The 4B Development Corporation provided staff with the direction to move forward with
this project.
5. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PURSUANT TO PROVISION OF THE OPEN MEETINGS
LAW, CHAPTER 551.071 THROUGH 551.076, 551-087, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE
(CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY, DELIBERATION REGARDING REAL
PROPERTY, DELIBERATION REGARDING PROSPECTIVE GIFT OR DONATION,
La Porte Development Corporation - 1/22/2007
2
Page
PERSONNEL MATTERS, DELIBERATION REGARDING SECURITY DEVICES, OR
EXCLUDING A WITNESS DURING EXAMINATION OF ANOTHER
WITNESS IN AN INVESTIGATION, DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS)
A. SECTION - 551-087 - (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) MEET WITH INTERIM CITY MANAGER,
CITY CONSULTANT/ADVISOR AND CITY
ATTORNEY, REGARDING ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT (PROJECT AUSTIN
POWERS)
B. SECTION - 551-072 - (PROPERTY SALE OR EXCHANGE) MEET WITH INTERIM CITY MANAGER,
CITY CONSULTANT/ADVISOR AND CITY
ATTORNEY REGARDING CITY/COUNTY
HOTEL PROJECT
The La Porte Development Corporation and Council retired to Executive Session at 5:12
p.m. and returned to the Regular Meeting and reconvened at 5:56 p,m,
6. No action was taken on items considered in executive session,
7. Administrative Reports.
There were no items to report.
8. Board Comments
It was the consensus of the Board to hold monthly meetings and the next meeting to be held
on March 12, 2007.
9. Adjournment
The meeting was duly adjourned at 5 :57 p,m.
Respectfully submitted,
M~~II.~
City Secretary TRMC, CMC
La Porte Development Corporation Secretary
~~iS 12th day of March, 2007.
Pat Muston, President
. ,
. ,
E xlUbU A - 1/ Z Z /07 Me.e;Ung Minuteo 06 CUy Co unc.-U Me.e;Ung
-
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
Notice has been given that a public hearing of the La Porte
Development Corporation will be held at 5:00 P.M, on
Monday, January 22, 2006, in City Hall Council Chambers,
604 West Fairmont Parkway, La Porte Texas 77571
. ,
. ,
. ,
. I
. ,
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
. The Public is invited to make comments regarding the
proposed project:
The board will conduct a Public Hearing for the
expenditure of LPDC funds related to the creation of
jobs and job training found by the board to be suitable
for the development or expansion of manufacturing
facilities
Notice of this public hearing was published in the legal
classified section of the Bayshore Sun and was posted
on the City's website
1
'''''",,;:>:>,,,:.;
"
,s;'>"'"
.,;\:'.:t;:~:i~::;1f5
s.;;":.:,::~~~:~;~
;):H,S]~[~1
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ilL ~Jq
III The Public Hearing Notice triggers a 60 Day Right to
Petition - During this time the public has the right to
petition against the proposed use of funds
!? The petition must be signed by more than 10% of the
registered voters of the City (19,878 registered voters)
~ The petition can ask that the city hold an election on
the issue before that specific project or type of project
is undertaken
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
~ A petition cannot force an election on a project if the
voters have previously approved the specific project or
that general category of projects at an earlier election
called under the Act
La Porte in it's original ballot language included this
general category of projects: "projects to promote new or
expanded business enterprises" and "any other project
that the board determines will promote new or expanded
business enterprises"
At the end of the 60 day period the Development
Corporation is able to make expenditures related to the
project pursuant to the adopted budget and agreements
2
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Background on Project Austin Powers
. ,
. ,
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
. This is a project to manufacture tanks and vessels in the
City of La Porte
. This Company will have a central plant and corporate
headquarters in La Porte
II The City of La Porte is under serious consideration due to
our support of the project and the availability of a good
location
. ,
3
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
II This project is projected to create approximately 70
skilled technician positions by the end of year 5 of
operations
.. In addition to the new jobs there will be 50 existing jobs
retained
. ,
. ,
. ,
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
. This will be a joint effort from the City of La Porte, La Porte
Development Corporation, and potentially San Jacinto
College
.. This project may receive tax abatements and other
incentives from the City of La Porte
.. This project is receptive to partnering with the La Porte
Development Corporation
.. The proposed manufacturing center is near the
intersection of Fairmont Parkway and South Sixteenth
Street and appropriately zoned light industrial
. ,
4
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
l(i The proposed expenditure of $50,000 in 48 funds is for
the creation of jobs and job training and other eligible
expenses found by the board to be suitable for the
development or expansion of manufacturing facilities
~." Eligible expenditures are:
. Job training
. Land and facility. improvements
. Machinery and supplies
. Financial transaction costs
. Planning costs
. Cleanup costs
. , ,
. ,
. ,
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
II The expenditure of 48 funds by the LPDC will be tied to
milestones to be accomplished over a period of time
(est. 3-5 yrs,) and be subject to an agreement between
48 and the party
II Milestones will be based on standards for the number of
jobs created and the volume of sales achieved
5
,:',":,.:-:'-',;
4'~t~~!t~!-~ .
~>?~~~~~F'~
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
.- -
Sales General Fund 48 Street Maintenance Total
Year 1 3,920,000.00* 39,200 19,600 9,800 68,600
Year 2 5,920,000.00* 59,200 29,600 14,800 103,600
Year 3 6,580,000,00* 65,800 32,900 16,450 115,150
Year 4 7,780,000.00* 77,800 38,900 19,450 136,150
Year 5 8,440,000,00* 84,400 42,200 21,100 147,700
These sales projections are based on numbers contained in the business plan
obtained from the subject company
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Sales General Fund 48 Street Maintenance Total
Year 6 9,100,000.00** 91,000 45,500 22,750 159,250
Year 7 9,760,000.00** 97,600 48,800 24,400 170,800
Year 8 10,420,000,00** 104,200 52,100 26,050 182,350
Year 9 11,080,000.00** 110,800 55,400 27,700 193,900
Year 10 11,740,000.00** 117,400 58,700 29,350 205,450
Totals 84,740,000.00** 847,400 423,700 211,850 1,482,950
** These sales projections are based on a pattern established in years 1-5
6
. ,
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
III The anticipated return in sales tax revenue to the
City of La Porte and the La Porte Development
Corporation over a 10 year period:
" City $1,059,250.00
III 48 $423,700.00
. , . I . t
. I . I
. I . I . f
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
LA PORTE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Questions?
7
REQUEST FOR LP DEVELOPMENT CORP. AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Date Requested: March 5
Appropriation
Requested By:
Source of Funds:
Fund 038
Department:
Account Number: 038-6030-565-5007
Report: X Resolution:
Ordinance:
Amount Budgeted: $0
Exhibits: Data from Rconomic Development Online & Avalancht Amount Requested: $10.000
Exhibits: Outline of Proposed Website
Budgeted Item:
YES
II
Exhibits: T .etter from Wehsite Development Co Representative
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
A well-designed website dedicated to the subject of economic development is a very important aspect of an overall economic
development program.
Both research and practical tips received at training sessions promote the importance of a website as a tool for economic
development. While the City is represented on both Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership and the Alliance Houston Port
Region websites, neither the City nor the LP Development Corp. have a web site that fully profiles the community, incentives
or relevant economic development tools. Staff believes the funding of a quality economic development website is an effective
and efficient part of an overall economic development strategy.
The City's intern, Mike Stokes, has done substantial research into the contents of several economic websites and has produced
an outline of proposed content for a website.
Staff requests the LP Development Corp. approve an expenditure of an estimated $10,000 to fund the development ofa quality
economic development website. An early estimate for website development was $8,000-$10,000.
Steps from here would be;
./ ConfmnJrecommend funding source (and use of funds) (potentially from unexpended funds in current budget)
./ Secure competitive quotes
./ Select vendor
Action Reauired bv LP Development Corporation:
Provide direction to staff regarding the funding and development of an economic development website.
Approved for LP Development Corporation A2enda
~~07
EconomicDevelopmentOnline ?iPJ.
Newsletter
January 2007
1. Too ED Marketinq Strategies of 2006
2. ED Website Must-haves for 2007
3. Too ED Websites of 2006
4. Site Selection Faster and Different Today
5. Too Search Enqine Terms of 2006
BEST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING STRATEGIES OF 2006
Most experts anticipated that the Internet would become the #1 marketing
strategy for economic developers by 2006 and that is exactly what happened. In a
national survey the Internet blew away all other marketing strategies in the
economic development profession.* Here are the top 4 most effective marketing
strategies according to the survey:
#1 Website 620/0
#2 Marketing with a regional/state organization 30%
#3 Familiarization Tours. 24%
#4 Public Relations 19%
Responding to its effectiveness, in 2007 there will be a strong trend toward
economic developers reallocating resources and investing heavily in improving
their websites with dynamic website services that provide the information
businesses need.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEBSITE MUST-HAVES FOR 2007
According to Site Selection magazine, "Online databases of
available buildings and sites became a must for top-
performing organizations in 2005. Those groups that didn't
have this service simply were not able to compete." Virtually
every agency that made the magazineaCMs list of top economic development
organizations "used a state-of-the-art Web site to generate interest from corporate
site selectors and consu Itants."
In 2006 the most effective and fastest-growing online
strategy for communicating the benefits of expanding,
relocating or growing a business was the inclusion of
Geographic Information System (GIS) property databases
that include site-specific demographic analysis, business
reports and interactive mapping.
By the end of 2006, the majority of the largest cities in the United States were
already served by this technology. Economic development organizations that want
to stay competitive must implement this strategy in 2007.
SITE SELECTION IS FASTER AND DIFFERENT
According to the 2006 article "The Internet Has Changed the Dynamics of Site
Selection" by Bob Ady, Founder of Ady International, "In the past five or six years,
the dynamics of the site selection industry have changed more than the previous
40 years combined. What's driving such change? Simply put, the availability of
information through the Internet. The site selection consultant uses the
information from a community's web site and other online sources. If a community
doesn't have a website, the website cannot easily be found or it doesn't have the
right type of information, the consultant moves on to other communities that have
the information he or she needs,"
Changes in
Site Selection
Length of typical site
selection search
Scope of initial
screening
Percentage of site
selection process done
remotely versus in-
person
Number-one tool for
learning about
communities
Then Now
(5-6 Years ago) (2006)
Six months or
more
Four to eight
weeks
One or two
dozen
communities
Hundreds of
communities
40/60
80/20
Personal visit
Website/Internet
Responding to its effectiveness, in 2007 there will be a strong trend toward
economic developers reallocating resources and investing heavily in improving
their websites with dynamic website services that provide the information
businesses need.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEBSITE MUST-HAVES FOR 2007
According to Site Selection magazine, "Online databases of
available buildings and sites became a must for top-
performing organizations in 2005. Those groups that didn't
have this service simply were not able to compete." Virtually
every agency that made the magazineaCMs list of top economic development
organizations "used a state-of-the-art Web site to generate interest from corporate
site selectors and consultants."
In 2006 the most effective and fastest-growing online
strategy for communicating the benefits of expanding,
relocating or growing a business was the inclusion of
Geographic Information System (GIS) property databases
that include site-specific demographic analysis, business
reports and interactive mapping. By the end of 2006, the majority of
the largest cities in the United States were already served by this technology.
Economic development organizations that want to stay competitive must
implement this strategy in 2007.
Click here to see examples of these types of websites.
BEST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEBSITES OF 2006
The following list includes the International Economic Development CouncilaCMs
top award-winning economic development websites for 2006.
Top Special Purpose Website by Population
a€<j: Population 200,000 or more: Tennessee.Valle'i-Authodty
a€<j: Population 200,000 or more: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. WA
a€<j: Population 50,000 to 200,000: Lafayette-West Lafayette EDC. OH
a€<j: Population 50,000 or less City of Georgetown, TX
Top General Purpose Website by Population
a€<j: Population 200,000 or more: Tennessee Valley Authority
a€<j: Population 200,000 or more: Virginia's Gateway Region
a€<j: Po pu lation 50,0 00 to!2Qwj.D..9__G.n~~Area Chg.m!:Ler gf_CQ_mmJ;~r..c~..
200,000: KY
a€<j: Population 50,000 or less Alliance of Edwardsville & Glen Carbon, IL
Avalanche Consulting:: Marketing Minute:: September 2006
Page 1 of2
Joerns, John
From: Barbara Cutsinger [barbara@bayareahouston.com]
Monday, October 16,2006 12:22 PM
Karen Capps; Doug Frazier; mproudy@houston.rr.com; Birdie McBride;
bgiusto@cityofwebster.com; john.kennedy@nassaubay.com; Joerns, John; Teresa Vazquez;
aforbes@ci.dickinson.tx.us
Subject: September Marketing Minute
Sent:
To:
Here's a newsletter you might be interested in ........
Barbara
Hitting a Homepage HOlnerUn
Simple Tipsfor Scoring Big with your Homepage
Smart Marketers
News You Can Use
About Avalanche
Have you given your homepage a good work out lately?
It is the single most important page in a website, but the
most often neglected, Take time to shape it up, and
you'll see a healthy increase in the number of visitors
who delve deeper into your website.
The sole purpose of a homepage is to quickly direct visitors to
information. To begin your homepage work out, consider that the
average website visitor will only wait five seconds for a page to load.
Remove flashy graphics, revolving photos. and other features that slow
loading time to give your home page an automatic performance boost.
Once your homepage launches. give your visitors fast access to
information. First, keep your homepage and navigation aesthetically
and functionally similar to other economic development organizations'
websites. This creates instant familiarity for your visitors, reducing the
amount of time it takes to find the information they're looking for.
Second, limit the number of main navigation buttons Community
Overview, Sites and Properties, Target Industries, Data Center, News,
and About Us are intuitive ED topics into which most other pages will
fit, whether your site contains 20 pages or 200. Always order
navigation buttons from the most important topic to the least, from top
to bottom or left to right. If your primary audiences are businesses and
site selectors, place real estate information first, then data, and then
extraneous topics like news and EDc information.
Finally, address your audiences by name on the homepage. Buttons
2/28/2007
Avalanche Consulting:: Marketing Minute :: September 2006
instructing "Businesses," "Residents," and "EDC Members" to click
through to dedicated sections of the website will improve traffic flow
and elevate the marketing power of your website.
Speed, content, and audience focus: These three critical
components of an effective website all hinge on the performance of
your homepage. Simple changes to your homepage could make the
difference between striking out and hitting a homerun.
Avalanche Consulting supplies website sto)'ybow'ds, content, and copyu.witiny
for economic development websites. Please contact usj!)r more infomlOtion
about ow' services.
Smart Marketers
We focus this month on city websites. Establishing a strong online
presence can be challenging for city economic development
departments. City homepages are often crowded with content, long
lists, and mismatched graphics that scare away prospects rather
than capturing their interest.
Bnt fear not, city EDers, there's hope! Our three Smart Marketers
this month show that it's possible for a city's homepage to express a
high degree of professionalism and make it easy for businesses to
t1nd development related information:
City of Prescott, Arizona
Click on "Business" in the main navigation bar and you'll find a we11-
organized presentation of top-line site selection information.
City of Greenville, South Carolina
This website begins with an attraetive hom,~page that neatly organizes
information into six topics. Development information is available in a
single click.
City of Tacoma, \Vashington
Tacoma's home page clearly states the purpose of the website and
organizes website pages into six intuitive topics, including "Business."
Unsubscribe
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by A VG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405/ Virus Database: 268.12.3/446 - Release Date: 9/12/2006
2/28/2007
Page 2 of2
News You Can Use
We love to apply ideas from
private industry to our
economic development
clients' websites. You can do
the same. Before your next
website overhaul, check out
the Web Marketing
Association's WebAward
site for inspiration. WMA's
annual awards go to the best
websites in 99 different
industries. Model your
copywriting and graphics
after winners in your target
industry categories.
Economic Development Website Proposal
The following is a breakdown of how an improved economic development website could
be structured.
Home Page- ~
-A Perfect Place to do Business- Similar to what is found in the "Ready for
Business Catalogue"
Community Profile-
-About La Porte- Similar to "La Porte: Then and Now" from RFB catalogue
-Quality of Life- Similar to "Quality of Life: Second to None" from RFB
catalogue
-Population Demographics-includes workforce demographics; projections, etc.
Same info as on City website, perhaps more, with attractive presentation
-Major Employers- Update of "La Porte's Top 100 Business Partners" from
catalogue, if possible
- Workforce Development -Similar to what's in catalogue
-Economic Profile- Similar to what's in catalogue, with more information
-Mapping-Interactive GIS system with lots of data/tools
-Current Development Projects Same as the named document
-Online Database of available buildings/sites- This is a huge asset if accomplished
-Economic Development Strategic Plan- If one were developed
-Incentives-Horne page has short narrative
-TIRZ summary with link or pdf
-Tax abatement summary with link or pdf
-Industrial District summary with link or pdf
- La Porte Development Board Grant Assistance
-Freeport Tax Exemption
-Harris County Tax abatement
-State incentives, enterprise zones, Tx ED bank, Texas Capital Fund, State -
Franchise Tax Credit, Venture Capital Texas CAPCO, in-state tuition for
employees-Brief explanations of a several with link to Texas site or BAHP
-Contact Us
-Personal assistance ED coordinator
-Pre-development meetings/meet with an official
-Partnerships
-Economic Alliance
-BAHP
-- San Jacinto College
-Others
- The development process (a guide)
-Pemiits and inspections/zoning/subdivision Similar to what's found in "Ready
for Business" catalogue and departments
-Links to relevant sites associated with economic development, such as financiers,
etc.
4=.=~.=:;
....~
~M~,~ge
1560 West Bay Area Blvd" Suite 160
Friendswood, Texas 77546
phone 281.990.9333
tax 281.990.9402
www.emergeworks.com
October 2~l, 2006
RECEIVED
OCT 3 0 2006
M~S/STANT CITY
AGER'S OFFICE
City of La Porte
John Joerns, Assistant City Manager
City Hall
604 West Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, TX 77571
Dear John,
I was referred to you by Birdie McBride, the Administrator for the Economic DE-Ni310pment
Corporation, at the City of Seabrook whom you met through the Bay Awa Houston Econcmic
Partnership. I worked with Birdie on the Economic Development Corporati-Jn 'Nebsite, My name
is Heather Burchfield, and I am the Director of Business Development at eW er~,e Works, LLC.
Our corporate philosophy promotes commerce in the Bay area and supports OJr community. We
are a.n active member of Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership (BJ\HEP), "for whom WEl
continue to provide many services. Today I am pleased to announce th,rt we have complE:teej
the Clear Lake Area Chamber of Commerce's website (www.c1earlake.!rec1.com) as WEll1 as
landing a one year IT contract with the City of Seabrook. Also, in conjunc:tioll with C:lear Cr'~ek
ISD (~Merge developed a pro!Jram called IT4 Students (~ww.it4stL1dents.Cl.r.g). TtlEl program
refurbishes computers to be donated to underprivilElged students.
As an active member in the Bay Area community, eMerge wants to promote th3 City 0': La P'orte. We
have successfully supported over 50 compani(~s with their image and brand utili2:in~l cost-'9f\Hct~ve 'Neb
solutions and comprehensive graphic design. eMerge employs an award winnin!J d'3sign tE!am
including Mike Po persky who won "Designer of the Year" for 2005 from Bay Area Houston Economic
Partnership. Let us assist in making your City's website the] most aesth,~tically and t'3chnically
advanced it can be with the following services:
WEB DESIGN SERVICES GRAPHIC DESIGN SE :IVICES
. Website design . Brochures
. Existing website updates . Logo developmen
. Ecomrnerce . Illustration
. Flash . Marketing campaiqns
. Application integration . Annual reports
. Intranet/ExtranE3t development . Publications
. Search engine optimization . pad.age design
. Multimedia presentations
In addition to the~;e serllioes we offer custom design and IT ser"ice~; unique to your sJecific nl3Hcls, I
welcome the opportunity to Sit down and go over how to promote the City of LH Porte. To sGhecll.le a
meeting please contact me at ,'13.256,2856. I will follow up with you in a week.
~inc rely, ~ ...... ,
. / ' . J.
0---..., . . :;3t-t{ C?(; .' .d/
H'a~~ ~
Director of Business Development
eMerge Works, LLC
4
REQUEST FOR LP DEVELOPMENT CORP. AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Date Requested: March 5 2007
Appropriation
Requested By:
Source of Funds:
Department:
Account Number:
Report: X Resolution:
Ordinance:
Amount Budgeted:
Exhibits: Report
Amount Requested:
Exhibits:
Budgeted Item:
VIfS
NO
Exhibits:
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
In an earlier discussion with the Chairman and later at the LP Development Corp. meeting, the topic of the City/County plans
for Sylvan Beach Shoreline Project was briefly discussed. The board requested a presentation on the project.
The project will be a critical component to both the County's future development of the park and to the Hotel project under
consideration.
Mr. Barr, the City's Parks and Recreation Director will be present at the March 5, 2007 meeting to provide an overview ofthe
project. His report is enclosed.
Action Required bv LP Development Corporation:
Receive and discuss report on proposed Sylvan Beach Shoreline Project.
Approved for LP Development Corporation A!!enda
r.9~7
(Date
Sylvan Beach Shoreline Protection and Beach Re-nourishment
Project Report
4B Board Meeting
March 5, 2007
Historical OvetView
Sylvan Beach Park is located in La Porte, eastern Harris County,on Galveston Bay. The
pre-existing beach began a steady decline as a direct impact of the completion of the
Houston Ship Channel in 1928 due primarily to erosion caused by wind, ship's wake
damage, and subsidence over the ensuing years culminating with the loss of this
historic beach in 1961 (Hurricane Carla), making it a "beach" in name only. Erosion
continues substantially in portions of the shoreline where the bulkhead has failed, This
project will restore the beach and provide erosion protection for the park shoreline,
allowing future generations to enjoy the only public beach in Harris County.
project Scope
Project will consist of construction of approximately 2,000 linear feet of shoreline protection which
indudes construction of revetment and pocket beaches containing Beach Fill, Rock Groins, Graded
Stone Revetment, Concrete Walkway and Cellular Concrete Mattress, and associated s~e and
drainage 'M>rk as required to stabilize the shoreline of Sylvan Beach Park, located in La Porte, Harris
County, Texas, and \Nholly owned by Harris County. USACE, the Port of Houston Authority
B.U.G., the City of La Porte, Harris County, and the local TGLQ office are all ready to
support this project. La Porte and Harris County are committed to future maintenance
and upkeep of the site,
Project Benefits, Economic, and Environmental Impacts
This project would provide restoration and conservation of an important coastal
resource in Harris County and La Porte. Historically, it was the most important
recreational site and focal point in La Porte and East Harris County. Its restoration
would add a tremendous recreational amenity back to the park and the community.
Sylvan Beach would be the only public park with Galveston Bay coastal beach access
in all of Harris County, This project can provide safe, quality shoreline access to over
100,000 annual visitors from Harris County. Recreational activities and environmental
education are primary reasons for pursuit of the project as a way to educate the public
on the importance of coastal natura resources.
In addition, the project will also provide economic stimulation for area businesses,
restaurants, and hotels, as well as to stimulate community development and improve
Quality of Life for the area, Completion of this project will protect historic and valuable
government property for the recreational and environmental education and enjoyment of
present and future Texas residents. The stabilization and protection of the shoreline
would certainly enhance the efforts to procure a first-class hotel with its accompanying
economic impact for our city and East Harris County. La Porte Independent School
District elementary and secondary education classes currently use the existing pier for
sampling of water quality and marine life as a feature of its "hands on" environmental
and ecological studies. This project will allow enhance and expansion of that capability
in the future.
Project History and Estimated Costs
Phase I - Alternatives analysis funded through CEPRA (Coastal Project #1114), City of
La Porte matching partner; design chosen, completed July 2002.
Phase II - Project Design and permitting through USACE by URS Corporation, funded
through CEPRA with City of La Porte and Harris County as matching partners,
completed August 2003. USACE permit #23069 issued.
Project cost estimates have been established and are available for either two
construction phases, or a single project. The mobilization and demobilization costs
increase by approximately $121,000, from $2,810,433 to $2,931,433, if two phases are
undertaken.
Funding Efforts to Date
Harris County has previously committed Precinct 2 park funds as well as City of La
Porte commitment to funds for their combined 40% share of the project under the
CEPRA guidelines as administered by the Texas General Land Office. Both the City of
La Porte and Harris County expect to recover their funding outlay through the La Porte
TIRZ #1 for the project. There is no formal funding commitment for either HC or the City
of La Porte if the grant is not funded through CEPRA. CEPRA funding for this project
has been previously applied for and it was selected as an "Alternate Project' in both
2003 and 2005 cycles, but in both cycles, the project was not selected as an alternate.
The City of La Porte applied for funding through a FEMA restoration program in 2005,
but was notified that the project did not qualify. The City of La Porte has also applied for
Coastal Impact Assistance Program (ClAP) funding through both the state (TGLO) and
Harris County shares of these federal funds. TGLO funding was not approved, and
Harris County has submitted this project as a Tier Two project, with potential funding
with 2008 funds.
Potential Project Problems with Continued Delay
First, there has already been a substantial increase in estimated costs for this project
from its inception to the present. The original estimate presented to the Corps of
Engineers in 2003 for the project was $1.9 million. The CEPRA estimate in Cycle 3
(2004) was $2.4 million, and the latest estimate from our engineering firm, URS, in
August 2006 was $2.8 million. Each year the projec is delayed will add substantially to
the cost of the project. Based on this pattern, the cost of the project, if started in early
2008, would be approximately $3.1 million (all other things being equal),
Second, our U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit (#23069) was issued in December
2003 and is set to expire on December 31, 2008. If the project is not completed by that
date an extension must be obtained. And, although the Corps is amenable to an
extension provided there are no mitigating circumstances, we may be required to meet
changed and more stringent USACE regulations, guidelines, and requirements that
have been placed in effect since our approval in 2003. Any change in requirements
would most likely add to the overall cost of the project.
..--
Q)
+-'
Q) '+- ,^
- 0 v,
c. -c
E ~ C,+-
8 0 ~ .2 ~
(J.) I N () a.. a.. Co
CD 0> a.. >- w ~..c.
0.. :S O:c E () ~ ~
E :t::: <( 0 o+-'
o .............a.. E -c. ~ (J.) c
o L.Cen I-:J
I c5 cf. m::) .5 ~ m 8
" a.. ~ LO ~
.~ \o.J -C...J ~ +-' 0 en
en -c c 0 .0 ~ ON 2 .E
~ c m 0 -c .-. m m
mmc (J.) e~1i5:C
~ 0 .2> 6 ~ a.. C'J L. L.
...Jen...Jen (J.)0a2a2
en , n Q), n . - +-' 0 ......... .........
Q) \,.J 0 \,.J +-' m ....
> I- 1-.- c N L. I-
~ ~t) ~E en L.'-'~~ en
c.oQ).oQ)L.~Jg-c-c-g
CD -c .0' -c a.. ~ <( ~ ~ ~ ~
+-' (J.) a..L. Q) c c:: ", C. c. a..
-<( -c -c 0.- en "'" c. c.
5 I 5~ g>mu m m<(
'+--'+- OW-C ~0)0)C3
,-,- '-' 2 2 c c
Q) (J.) +-' 0 .-.-
en en en Q) -c-c
m m c _ c C
.t::. .t::. 0 Q) :J:J
a. a. () en lJ..lJ..
\ \ \ \ \ \
en
.;::
I-
m
:c
~
en
-c
c .
:J...........
'+- en
a..-g
~~
Of'..
1-0
00
~N
~ en
N ._
L.N
Q)
. - l-
I- Q)
::en i=
m'-'
~
-C+-'
(J.) C
+-' :J
.~ 0
-0
t)
Q)
.~
e
a.
\
~
~~
8 i
~ Ii
I-
8 ~
t
/
.--/ 1
I ~ e
i __ SCAlf (n)
V ,
I '00 200
~
~ l=:
.
""-
~,
1 !
- i
.
V 8
;t
..
*
'I
it .
ill ~ II
~~ ~i; 011..
~~ !~ io
~
1
~
1
v
~
8
8
!
~
./
5
REQUEST FORLP DEVELOPMENT CORP. AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Date Requested: March 5 2007
Appropriation
Requested By:
Source of Funds:
Department:
.\dlllinidr~tign
Account Number:
Report:
Resolution:
Ordinance:
Amount Budgeted:
Exhibits: Report
Amount Requested:
Exhibits: 4B Eligible Projects
Budgeted Item:
VES
NO
Exhibits: Cash Flow Worksheet
SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
Attached is a report by Stephen Barr regarding the development of a Joint Venture Sports Complex with the City of Pasadena.
The report will provide a history of the funding and the projects development into a joint venture.
While researching other 4B issues it was noted that both Amateur Athletic Facilities and Public Parks are eligible projects.
While City Council was prepared to issue an additional $1.5 million in Certificates of Obligation for the joint venture the debt
service would be paid from the City's General Fund.
Since park development is still a permissible 4B project and economically viable for the LP Development Corporation staff
would like to discuss with Council and the LP Development Corp. the pledging of 4B funds for the debt service related to the
additional $1.5 million needed for the joint venture.
At the meeting Michael Dolby will cover the [mancial position of the LP Development Corp. and the Long Range Plan
Worksheet included in you package.
Action Required bv LP Development Corporation:
Provide direction to staff regarding the funding of the Joint Venture Sports Complex with the City of Pasadena.
Approved for LP Development Corporation Aeenda
~Ilt 'l
( Date
Joint Venture Sports Complex
Project Report
4B Board Meeting
March 5, 2007
Overview
In 2002 citizens of La Porte approved the sale of General Obligation bonds to
provide: a) $1.2M for the development of the City's 33 acre west side park
property located on Canada Road, and b) $2M for the development of a youth
baseball complex. Since that time the City has undergone preliminary discussion
with the City of Pasadena and, to a lesser degree with Harris County, to
participate in a joint venture sports complex located just south of Fairmont
Parkway and east of the Pasadena Convention Center on land owned by the City
of Pasadena, but located in the City of La Porte's extra-territorial jurisdiction,
Council Direction
In September 2006 Council directed staff to implement a conceptual design and
preliminary cost estimate for the project. The report provided back by Randall-
Porterfield Architects, Inc. includes a conceptual design, and preliminary cost
estimate for the project, and is enclosed for your review.
Report Summary
Conceptual Design - The conceptual design shows a total of 23 fields, 9 of which
are designated as La Porte Fields and two "Shared Fields", % usage of each of
these fields would be designated for La Porte, making our total number of 1 0
fields. Pasadena would have 12 fields, with % usage of the two "Shared Fields",
making a total of 13 fields for their operations which is acceptable to them. This
design, while still conceptual, shows that we can get a working design that will
meet both cities' needs for the project. The design provides 920 parking spaces,
with overflow parking available through a pedestrian bridge and pathway to the
Pasadena Convention Center parking areas. The design also provides pavilions
for restrooms, concessions, and shelter from inclement weather, as well as play
areas that include basketball, volleyball and children's play activities, and a Dog
Park,
Preliminary Cost Estimate -The total preliminary numbers for the project,
including contingency and an 8% annual inflation factor, is $12,525,488. Overall,
through cost sharing, aggressive marketing, and design modification and
monitoring, the Pasadena and La Porte staff are confident that La Porte's share
of the project can be reduced to $3.5M,
Funding
The proposed agreement would split the funding on a 40%-60% basis, with the
City of La Porte funding approximately 40%, and the City of Pasadena funding
approximately 60% of the total project. As you may recall, the City of La Porte
has $2M ready for the project. Through the methods related in the previous
paragraph, staffs of both cities are confident that we can reduce the total cost of
the project to approximately $9M. The following is a summary of the proposed
cost savings, based on the preliminary cost estimate, and identified cost savings
measures. Council gave direction to sell Certificates of Obligation for the
additional $1.5M that will be required for the La Porte share.
Staff Recommendation
The La Porte Boy's Baseball Association is very much in favor of consolidating
their baseball operations for league play to a single location. Although if this plan
goes through, they will continue to practice at the Fairmont fields, I'm sure the
surrounding homeowners will be grateful for having organized activities end at 9
pm instead of 11 pm every night. The ability to consolidate games at one site will
allow them to provide their maintenance activities more effectively,
After discussing the project and issues brought forth, if Council directs us to
move forward with the project, we are proposing the following action plan:
. Prepare an Interlocal Agreement between the two cities for Design
Services, The Selection process for the architecUengineering firm
would be included in the agreement. This agreement should take 120-
150 days to complete.
· A second Interlocal Agreement would then be presented, for
Construction and Operations, with assigned areas of operational
responsibility and facility oversight. Construction of the facility,
depending on weather and other considerations, should also be
completed in 120-150 days. Given lead time and contingencies, the
entire project should be completed somewhere in the last quarter of
2007 or first quarter of 2008,
· Council should note that once a decision has been made on the joint
venture sports complex, we can move forward with design of the
Westside park property. The design concept is set for the park, but will
require changing if the joint venture project is scrapped.
f. The Sales Tax for Economic Development
('
neYJ or expanded business enterprises limited to streets and roa~s,JCiil~p,:rs, water and
s~'#.~f9tilities~ ~and. electric utilities, gas utilities. drainage, site improvements,.. and related
improvements, and telecommunications and Internet irriproverilents,~n~q,rglP~ remediation
;;'~19119 thefGulfof Mexico.157 Accordingly, Section 4B corporations .r'nay assist with limited
infrastructu.re improvements, which the board finds will promote or develop new or
expanded business development. The funding of these infrastructure improvements do not
have to be conditioned upon the creation or retention of primary jobs.
3) Career centers. Certain career centers can also be provided land, buildings, equipment,
facilities, improvements and expenditures found by the board of directors to be required or
suitable for use if the area to be benefitted by the career center is not located in the taxing
jurisdiction of a junior college district. 158
. .
~99itipl1C\ny, Section 4B(a)(2)(.4.), (C), (D), and (E) of the Act sRe9ificC\uy.p,e~mlt.~.g.~p~nditures of
"$~Rtipi}~I3.t~~pr()c~ed::>for land, buildings, equipment, expenditures, and improvements suitable
!'fortli~ fdiiowing. tYpes Of projects:
'ft!~siq,..~.',~n,d.CJmate~r..spprts .anda~l1let~cfacili~ies. .PtQfe~sib~a.f:~'rj~!~~ateur
,'. ahd:ra'thletiCs],incll!qjng"st<:l~iu!ms'J,aJld ballparks areai"pemii~sible!' S~Ction 4B
"6t;J~:". . ,
2) Entertainment, tourist and convention facilities. Entertainment. tou~st, and
convention facilities, including auditoriums, amphitheaters, concert halls, museums, and
exhibition facilities are a permissible Section 4B project.160
(--'\.
l
.....-.
*' 3) PubliC: parks and related open space improvements. Public parks, park facilities and
events, and open space improvements are permissible Section 4B projects 161. . .
4)Affordable housing.. Projects required or suitable for the d~velppment,C\nq expansion
'of "affordable housing" as defined by federal law (42 United States Code, Section 12745)
are'apermissibleSection 4B project.162)~, . .-
5), W.atersupply fac,i1ities. Any water supply facilities. includingda,ms,trC!nsD"1i~si(m lines,
welffteld developments, and other water supply alternatives can be a permissib'~Section
4B project.163 Nonetheless, to undertake a water supply facility a majority Of th~ qualified
voters of the city voting in an election called and held for that purpose must approve the
Water supply projecU64 The ballot proposition for the election shall be printe~ to provide
fcWVotingft;>ror against the proposition:165" '
. ~ {
"~he u~e of sales and use tax proceeds for infrastructur~ relcding to
. (insert description of water supply facility).~~'i
c",..
6..)..\Nat.er.. conserv. atio.n p.rog. rams. Water conservation programs, including incentives to
JIl~t~l,tWc:lter:sC3viilg plumbing fixtures, educational programs, brushcootrol wpgrams, and
, p/ogr;a.,rn!i to replacemalfunctioriing or leaking water lines and otherwater facUitie$ can be
,,~-;e,~riji}s~ible Se~tioh 4B project. ;66 Similar to water supply facilities, to undertake a water
cQ'rlse'ryation prograino ~{maIority of the qualified voters of the city voting in an election
c;ane~:rand held' for that purpose must approve the water conservation prograll1,167 The
.. b'M9tW9positiori for the" election shall be printed to provide for voting for or against the
'propdsition:168 .
HANDBOOK on ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LAWSfor TEXAS CITIES
35
....,
c-
-- co
0.0
-'Q) 0)
Q)CJ) Cr--
~ ro ~ 0
omx~o
c...c~~N
ro ..., c.. ..
.....IgE-oLO
1>- OL--c
ro ro 0
cQ)OOL-
Q)L- mro
-02 m~
roc ~
en Q)
8!.>
Q) x ~
'"'C
.- Q) x 0)
UJ - Q) fI7
+-' c.. -
UJ E c.. ...
Q) E Q) '+- '"'C
~ 0 t 0 Q)
t) 0 0 (0 t+=
I... Q) () Q) 0 Q) .-
- a.. +-'
- I... I... I...
~ CO ~ ::J Q) CO 0 CO c
.c I... +-' CO N Q)
t) I... ..c ..c
C) Q) CO ::J UJ ....J I... UJ '"'C
. . C UJ c.. ::J ......, Q) .-
f/) .- CO I... e: UJ I... CO C)
'"'C Q) +-' ~ .c
UJ Q) ... C
CD c .c '"'C Q) 0 C
CO > t +-' Q) .-
::J .- '"'C '"'C
U ..c UJ I... X t) '"'C
'+- +-' '+- ......, 0 Q) Q) 0 C
... ::J +-' C e: a.. - > co ::J
co 0 UJ ..... c.. UJ
0 0 C '+-
::s C ~ Q) '"'C CO E I... CO
-, .- X
0 .- ~ C ....J c.. a..
C) oes 0 +-' Q)
.C I... CO "'0 I... t) c.. t) I... -
tJ) 0 ~ ~ +-' CD ~ CO Q) ~ c..
c en UJ .~ E
- t Q) 0 t ~ 0
CO CD '"'C '"'C I... '"'C 0
+-' c.. Q) E c.. Q) 0 LO c.. Q) ()
0 0 c.. .
C 0 .- ~ '+- t+=
'+-
+-' .- '- I... UJ ~ 0 .- UJ
I... +-' 0 a.. fI7 +-'
-- C c.. C CO C +-' t
-0 - Q) Q) t)
0 Q) Q) E - Q)
.- ~ > CD ..c CO I... Q) 0
C - I... '"'C .t::. I... +-' C CO '"'C .~ c..
-
.- CO .- Q) .., CO ..c 0
~ '+- 0 en
::s c.. ~ '"'C I... Q) 0 UJ ~ I...
.- c..
0 +-' -
LL N N ~ .- LO co
LL '"'C
. . . +-'
(V') ~ N '"'C LO 0
fI7 fI7 fI7 <( fI7 l-
I ~l'~<JfIII!- I , ~. /r
/ #~ f ~~ l'~~ " ('~
l' '(. . {. t ' (..
~U' ~~
~&."> Q
e~
~U'IVICINITY MAPr~
Legend
c=:J BAYPO~T _INDUSTRIAL_DIS
c=:J citLlimits1
...~::;"I"::A t"'"'-':;~
..
~~~
[\ : .c
'"
-~.;:I\.~. ~;
/
-~~\ Y-~'\'.
: r~ t .{"t- ....... r---if
. ~~\./.:.'~:,o+r"d .
:1 le['j;:".&r ;:
^:-,_-:.-:>'~~--;t;~ ,_''}:;:~ -~
. ):-~.j/1~
:~; ,', I ,:;1 . ~
.; l!"- " '.)l..A\
I} 1".' . d
,it;: \i
.. ! I
9 ~ .
...... i '1
lJ J./-'""r r ~>,' :~
:' ... "'. j:, rf~ i :
I or!1 t,i~_
~- :_~:.~:~.,"--': u~
-:;;.~{~.. .- ~
(-; J '.
. J
,
~
.
\'
~,!
..;-;:.... ..,;
~~c:
~~..";..:
.,
"
l.'
..v......~ ~-::
a~~',.
..
.
.
~..,.l:"~;
..>or'" t'..
Q""'''' ...-
a::::o...."'..
-=.,...~...-
~tn
~ I~
r J
/1'1
tU ~)
,I.
~"
, "
.
"
..
<
~
._~
::;;::
......-,..~ ~, :..5 v~- v
/
-r\)
/,
.'.1*1
~~~,
...'17 ;,;
..fOil
".,)
dl tf)-4h, .a
-1 ~~~~
fJl\.)thl"
tr' -i 4 ., -t
-1 ., t' t
/!lhunU
t\
I,
/.
III
I
III
()
() ff"q
III
lfi" ///
()i t\t\CJ ',1
a "f. I I
O:'~ ;'
it ~lll . f,
a I\nnt
\ '
\
i
...;.. ....;..;...;..: l '
" '--J
Ill.", ().o. ~1
~.q(J 'h.)~ (}
~
,)
...
}
fI'
of
> ,',
}, \i' !~
ul !J~. l);:
"':1 .. ~
fl L-t t~9~1
(/ .,1' IJ
lrl ,:):I~~ I':
u. " I'L'/ 1
~~t~...~~ b
. ..ClInl. I
f.OOi~
., '
n:t
'ft_
. '
</)';
/.
i1u
"
~' . J
II
q'}
II'"
~ ~l
\-,
/
./
vi
.,
,
\I
II
\I
<ILl
., ~~
/ nat
{) "'.,
I ;(:.,
f :"
~ rl..
till,;.....
,.1: ~:~j.,:
i' ~
") .ll.
/ v'1\~'"
V ~:;l':
~ ~,\~:
o ~ of.
z
<f
-A
III
lU
1-- i
-;
tf)
)
Q(
<(
Z
)
'.,
~ t
,.,
'I > ~ .
- ~!
11. ~!
ill!
n
@..
.
~I
.
r
"
"
"
,
t'
r.
l,
.
.
"
..
"
..
"
.
,
..
II
.
0:.1
<
.
!,
I
.,
CD
...
<C
CD
~
CD
...
CD
.c
~
co
>
co e ~ 0
c: 0.= ~ +-'
Q) a. .- .- -0
-0 Q) CO ~ '- U 0)
co.c,-~o~"O=
~ == .E (; :: Q) 5 "E
c:o...~en~55:5~.c-
C)~--:13ro '+-en:]co
._ ..c co c: c: E 0 Q) en > -e
~ "0 C) :] tt= Q)O) C ..c: 0) e co
0) 0) 0 ... '- .Q +-' .c a. ~
Cl ~ .....I () "0 C) 10 -c == a. c::
oO)co~O)<('-O)~co.E
~ .>- c: +-' c: _ 0) +-' '-
0) .- C) co c. 0) +-' 0 en
1:: ~ "0 () .00 U 0 c. as \toO- 0)
0) co ..c: 0) 0 E E en >
Eg>en+-,"OL::"O ==0
0) .- co 0 0) C 0 Q) () E
0) ..cO) a.. ..c g> c co U ~ 5
'- ~.9 .- - c: .5!2 C) 0 5
C) en ..c 0) c: 0 <( () .-
<( . - "O..c 0 +:i c: +-'
en "0 Q) U C) - U
m 0) Q) +-' .5!2 "0 :] .- co ~ :]
o U > c: 0) '- en U .- ~
o .- 0 Q) ts 0) 1i5 0) .Q () en
_ c: '- en 0) U "0 '- c:
'- a. 0) .~ 0 c: +-' 0) :5 0
Q)Q)o.'-O,-ou+-'O()
C en co a. a. c. () .~ E ..c
C Q) e ts
0) == a. 0)
..c: ..c: .~
S S ~ ~
(e
~
co
'-
o
(I(fj.
. "
-
/''0
f,e ."d
\.y
/'(j
f.' ,"
, l'f"
/'@
f/ /:J
."
--
~
~
~
'"
Q,l
-;
~
=
..,.
=
.S
...
...
Q,l
~
'-'
'C
=
=
...
=
.S
...
'" ~
~ '"
~ Q
Q,l Q.
~ ~
~u
t:...
Q =
=- Q,l
~ e
..:lj'
.... Q,l
Q >
CQ,l
.. ~
u Q,l
...
'"
Q
=-
~
..:l
Q,l
-=
...
'"
oS
=
~
is:
Q,l
CJ)
=
~
~
CJ)
=
Q
..:l
]Vl
0) ,
.~:!:
20
~N
]~
0) ,
.~~
20
~N
]r<I
.g, ~
20
~N
""'N
E-
O) ,
.~=
20
~N
"'"
E
0) ,
.~S
20
~N
""'0
E -
0) ,
" 0\
'=0
20
~N
]0\
_0
0) ,
,,00
'=0
20
~N
""'00
Eo
0) ,
" r-
'=0
20
~N
""'r-
Eo
0) ,
" IC
'=0
20
~N
cu~
EI/")
0) 0
...:~
o
IC
N'
0\ "I" M
"1"01/")
I/") IC
Nq:-""
"I"ICO
"lM~
0;'
N
0\
'"
M
I/")
r-..:'
N"I"IC
MICO\
NN"I"
r----~ ., 00
0\00\
-q-"M f"-;.,
N
o
N
M
r-
IC'
M-"I"
NOOO
ICNO\
rt1o-:'C"i
I/") IC N
<o::T"N t"--..
M
o
o
r-..:'
o
o
'li
"1"0"1"
00 00 IC
N N I/")
. o' .
"1"1/")
"d".. N \0..
00
0\1/")"1"
r-"I"N
ON
6..f'..f'
r--OO
r'1.Nl.I1,.,
I/")
M
.,.,
IC
r-
r-
6
IC
r-
"1""
- - N
r-MO
N"I"r-
0"'0"'6
M 0\ N
~-"l
3
00
M
N
"1"'
I/") N r-
NN"I"
1/")1/")0
"' 0\ "'
0\ IC IC
"t - "1".
r-
~
.,.,
r-
r-
M
00 00 IC
00
0\00\
M "'.q-"'
I/") I/") 0
"t - "1".
IC
IC
M
I/")
00
M
ICOIC
00000
M I/") 00
r-:MO
N"I"
N,,- l""),
I/")
o
I/")
'li
N
N
M
"I"IC-
r-O\r-
r- M
IJ)" "I:"'--'"
"I"NIC
C'1-~
]
'g.
U
OIl
c
:s
~
OIl
c::
.~
'00
"
I:Q
'"
" "
E :>
(I] 8 ~
u; ~ .E ~
g~i~
v <I) lU '0
~~]l~
P:::
'"
:>
6::
, M 0
o
"1"0
"':0'
- 0
, 00 0
00 0
"1"0
"':0'
- 0
OMO
N 0
0\"1"0
If"ir--.:'O'
0-0
r- - -
o IC 0
0\ I/") 0
I/") 0\ 0
00"':0-
0-0
r---
00\0
N 0
r-ICO
or-"'o
- - 0
r- - -
000
IC 0 0
"1"0\0
Nr-"'d'
--0
r- - -
00\0
I/") IC 0
NOO
0000
N-O
r- - _
01/")0
"I" NO
0\ 0
MoOO
N-O
r- _ _
01/")0
OONO
o
C"ir-.:'6
M M 0
r- -
o
IC
o
6
"I"
r-
...
o
'" 'i;j
" c
'5 'E
~ 8
"oU
0) 0 _
'E N li
,,] E
r/}cg.
~~u
Vi o...~... ~
~..s..sCl
.a '"" """' .~
'6~~E
~ ~ ~ g
g. E! E! 8
&j,",,",~
~
"
....J
'"
~
E
'6
c
"
p.
'"
~
...]
" 0
5'"'
, M
"I"
r-..:'
;:::;
, 00
00
"I"
r-..:'
N
M
M
M
M
N
0\
IC
"I"
I/")
'li
N
0\
, 0\
M
M
00
N
0\
, 0
IC
M
6
M
0\
, 0\
M
00
M
0\
, I/")
IC
o
N'
"I"
0\
01/")
00
OM
00\
I/")
I/") "1".
, 0
IC
o
6
"I"
r-
~
"'l.
o
00
6
o
IC
N
0;'
N
0\
'"
M
I/")
r-'
N
o
N"
M
r-
'li
M
o
o
r-..:'
o
o
'li
~
-.
I/")
M
.,.,
IC
r-
r-
6
IC
r-
..f'
00
"I"
o
00
M
N
..f'
r-
0\
.,.,
r-
r-
M
IC
IC
M
I/")
00
M
'IS
'g.
U
OIl
c
:s
o
~
OIl
c
'6
c
~
I/")
M
00
M
0\
N
.,.,
r-
r-
0\
N
N
I/")
IC
N'
N
IC
M
N
0\
0\
o
N'
N
I/")
"'l.
N
"I"
~
r-
0\
o
0),
]
.~
U
OIl
c
:s
~
"'"'
o
'"
~
Cl
~
..8<
..
I:Q
...
..s
~ r-
r;:gg
v'~ ~
'i;j "
~ t2- l~
~gCl)
eOO.D
" " "
~]~
Vi ~ 00 '.0
.2 ~ ~ ~
~~.5~
~
'"
...:
"
~
c
"
i:i
'OJ
::1:
-
"
~
C/)
...
..s
o
o
o
6
o
I/")
""
<<l
'"
"
,2:
i:i
"
0)
.E
...
o
E
'"
"
~
...
..s
o
o
o
6
I/")
""