Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-02-1961 Special Meeting~~ • ! ,,, ~~ cial ~?ieeting La: Ports Planning and Zoning 0ommisgior~ ~:. aorta, -.. texas. =~ A~gus:t ~,z 1 q61 ~ .... '~s 30 ~'.:M.: ~bcairman. Els~.a amore pre~.s.ided ~ommiss:~::on menabera present`• wanes: Er~ell °~ig~iam~;. ~3:~: ~on~ptom, ~e~:~ ~.11~, er~.l~ore„ ~81~ or..~„ ti~lt'e~~ ~obers~on.,, ry,;- ~3:~i:"eg~ei„ aYard: ~i'~:. ~- w T~:e~nel^~ ~ ~lla~ o f ~ tYi®: 1t~:ol~th ~.da`; AC'~vi so3~y. ~ommitta~ was; pre~.~ent-;a Al]:eo . pr~:ent, weras4 lvr- ~~ E::, ffi'e~iffer~, ~uaeiltaen, ; ~~¢ . Q'shurn,; his: ~t ~ and 1~:.. A~~.. ~'.t~fis'~, and .,. pity ~ret~.ry Fr~k: Baker, and pity Attornsy;~ ~`: ~ 1~~.. L?~it'ma.Y. iyor Pfeiffer e~pla~ihed.~ t~iatJ they pu~pos~ o~~ the- ~¢eetin~ wee: t~ ir~sur~ t~iat:: tYie' 0'~.~y ~mmis~o~ and. the:- Zoning: Oommis~sion. w+~,ra together. iia their thinkir~:.o 1~;yor..- P~`e-iff-er=~ eaid txia~t~- the: pity t~ommi~~ion. supported' tie: ~ni~ig;: 0~+31nanee ~ : atat~d that: the ~it~ Yiac~ giv°e~ ~.. D~ous~ hi%e:~ ~~ day notices and_ they ~"1t~ intends to enforce the:: ordinanc~« 1~:~ D'lcua: i~.icated to t3ie~ Oity that' ]ie~ would tike: Dare- of hie: carport by... ~.ily 31 `~: 1961 t The; fir.:s~~• topi~~ of disc?uss~ion was: Aa~ticle~ 6~0~:;; s:eotion. 17 ~~ tha~ discusg~iotz~ t~: was- bro tout Para~rapYi a on pag:~ 38' I~.ir*ing u6h• that' the reas.on~ for the 25 foot frront°- yard. is to give: ne~ighbore~ freer: a~css:s. to air ~ and light: Open oarport-8~ do not restrict thi~s•: acce~8=:, The' question: of wha~J ~ona~tit~utee~ a roof: e~xte~~iorr_ wa~s~ a~ee~.• ~'errry Y~.ni~g='a•- s-.aid t~iat:~ oarporta~ are usually oonsicfiered~ to beA moot- extensions- when. they arse: atthe:d t'o the: bouse::~ 1~. ~~nham asked how. your. de~f'ine~. the: front' yard. in ee.ee,: of a corner lot.. ~.: _ Pitman suggested changing. the wording of this: paragraph to read. open .and enclos:e~d. caarpa~rtaa ly~ P~'eiff®r indic.ated~. that: it waa~ otivious~ that everyone- agreed that'. this- particu~.ar section should be~- rewritten and that the: ~.ty C:ommission will rewrites this.: section« ~Ahother question was raised- on: an application madam: by GAG' Roberte:on: miring this discussion it was pointed ~~~~ out tha~• the Zoning Ordinance-: was more re:stric~tiv®:. than. the, Btu~tber Fire~ne~: ors::. Miller pointed out th~tJ~ the Zoning- 0~'dinan~ee should not be more. restric:tige~ than the• F~ireezone= OrdinanreE:~ They applications for.. a p~ermit'~ made- by George: Brancri tbr' ~:• E'. fee`: This: application wasp for a garages to bey made into apartments at'' a:~ later data. rt'~. was indicated that': garage: Apartments. were not permitted in thig~ neighborhood' and that' tY~ property owners should be so ihformed: and to resubmit the applica~iorx indicating for personal uses only:a Air application by ~'h'=. Bvana:. fbr. a chickenhouse~ was discussea~e.. Ater the, discussion Mayor gfeiffer indicated that he thought that the- ace~ess~ory tiuil~ding clause ahourd. be- rewritte.n_ in every zone: and. the commercial Zones where= it applie.~. added. to Eugeniev N.~.iller motioned. that the. meeting adjourn, seconded b; ng; S. tember 13, 96a'~;° ~; A. Br metti~ag~~ ad ne l~ext~ meets -s '•• 1 i ecr .ta Nlyd~ F~Is ~ Mo r~ airman); Atte t.. _ A. ~ y ~ I