HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-22-1990 Meetingo •
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
MARCH 22, 1990
Members Present: Chairman Janet Graves, Commissioners Jack
Gresham, Inge Browder, Lola Phillips, Bobby
Blackwell.
Members Absent: Commissioners Charlie Boyle, Eugene Edmonds
City Staff: Director of Community Development Joel
Albrecht, Building Official Ervin Griffith,
Community Development Secretary Nina Browning,
Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong
Others Present: Decker McKim, Gus Breiden, Don Holloway and
Scott Brinks with International Cargo Network,
Mr. A.B. Dyess with Texas Land & Cattle Co.,
and 5 other citizens.
1) CALL TO ORDER
Meeting was called to order by Janet Graves at 7:00 PM.
2) APPROVE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 15, 1990, PUBLIC HEARING AND
REGULAR MEETING.
A motion was made by Inge Browder and seconded by Jack Gresham
to approve the minutes of the February 15, 1990 meeting as
submitted. All were in favor and the motion passed.
3) CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT REQUEST SCU90-002
SUBMITTED BY INTERNATIONAL CARGO NETWORK, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT
OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO CONSIST OF A REFRIGERATED
(FROZEN FOOD) WAREHOUSE COMPLETE TO BE LOCATED ON A MULTI-ACRE
TRACT.
Public Hearing was called to order at 7:03 PM.
Mr. Albrecht gave the Commission the staff's report concerning
the Special Conditional Use Permit (SCUP) requested by
International Cargo Network (ICN) represented by Mr. Don
Holloway. The property is currently zoned as follows:
Blocks 416, 417, 418, 419: PUD, Planned Unit Development
Blocks 415, 420: R-2, Mid-Density Residential
Blocks 432, 433, 434, 435,438,980: Business Industrial
Mr. Albrecht stated as this is the first Planned Unit
Development (PUD) proposed under Ordinance 1501, it will
;® probably be useful to begin this report by referring to Zoning
Ordinance Section 8-100. This section which summarizes the
intent and purpose behind PUD development guidelines. The
• •
• Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes of March 22, 1990
Page 2 of 5
purpose of this district is to provide for the grouping
of land parcels for development as an integrated
coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by
parcel, piecemeal, sporadic and unplanned approach to
development. This section is intended to introduce
flexibility of site design and architecture for the
conservation of land and open space through clustering
of buildings and activities through conditional use
provisions. It is further intended that PUDs are to be
characterized by central management, integrated planning
and architecture, joint or common use of parking,
maintenance of open space and other similar facilities,
and a harmonious selection and efficient distribution of
uses.
The intended use of the facility is as a refrigerated
warehouse complex. The SIC code designation for this
activity is 4222 (public warehousing). This activity is
listed as permitted in Business Industrial and all other
industrial zones (Section 7-500, Table A, Ordinance
1501). This activity is therefore acceptable within the
use zones for which it is proposed.
e In applying for a SCUP to allow construction of this PUD,
the applicants, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 8-401 of the Zoning Ordinance, have submitted
the following items for review by the Planning & Zoning
Commission and City Council:
1. General Plan
2. Construction Schedule
3. Documentation regarding property controls
The Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council reviews
and evaluations of the proposed project are to be based
on the above documents and are to be undertaken using
Section 8-402 of the Zoning Ordinance as a guide.
To date, the applicants have complied with all SCUP
requirements and is therefore eligible to be considered
for the requested SCUP.
Section 10-202 sets three conditions for approval of a
SCUP, these conditions are:
(1) That the specific use will be compatible with and
not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
® property, nor significantly diminish or impair
property values within the immediate area,
Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes of 3-22-90
Page 3 of 5
•
(2) That the conditions placed on such use as specified
in each district have been met by the applicant,
(3 ) That the applicant has agreed to meet any additional
conditions imposed, based on specific site
constraints, and necessary to protect the public
interest and welfare of the community.
Should this request be approved, Compliance with this
condition will be verified during the Major Development Plan
Review and Construction Permitting processes.
In terms of addition conditions, staff would suggest the
following:
(1) There shall be a thirty (30) foot landscape buffer,
with a planting plan to be approved by the Director
of Community Development, on the eastern and
southern faces of the staging area.
(2) The driveway width at Harbours Cut be widen from 24
ft. to 30 ft.
(3) Allow the City to have a 20 ft. utility easement
along the Broadway Street frontage for proposed
sewer line.
Options for request are as follows:
(1) Recommend City Council approval of the request as
submitted by the applicants
(2) Recommend City Council approval of the request with:
(a) conditional suggested by staff
(b) additional or amended conditions
(3) Recommend City Council denial of the request
(4) Table request for further consideration at a future
date
1. PROPONENTS
Mr. Don Holloway, President of ICN. He stated that he
was present basically to answer any questions the
® Commission might have for ICN. He also stated that he
had just been made aware of the proposed sewer line and
the only thing that he would ask would be to defer the
o •
Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes of 3-22-90
Page 4 of 5
landscaping on that portion of the property until the
sewer line was in. This would alleviate having to redo
the landscaping. Mr. Holloway also stated that the
widening of the driveway from 24 ft. to 30 ft. was no
problem and they would be glad to comply.
Mrs. Graves asked Mr. Holloway about the blocking of
Barbours Cut Blvd. with the train traffic and how they
planned to handle this. Mr. Holloway stated that the
Port of Houston was also concerned with this due too
their heavy truck traffic serving Barbours Cut and that
he had discussed this with Mr. Jim Pugh of Southern
Pacific and an "off-peak" time would be used for their
train traffic. The ICN facility will have only one a
day, which will be between 5-8:00 PM in the evening per
Mr. Scott Brinks, Vice-President of Operations of ICN
(proposed time).
Gus Breiden - La Porte. Texas. In favor of the request.
• 2. OPPONENTS
Mr. A. B. Dyess with Texas Land & Cattle Company. Company
he represents owns Lots 27-32, Block 420, that abuts the
property that ICN is acquiring for their facility. Mr.
Dyess stated that it would make the property owned by
Texas Land & Cattle Company difficult to sell and they
request that the Commission deny the SCUP.
Mrs. Graves at this time read into the record the responses
received from the mail-out for the Public Hearing. A total
of 53 letters were sent out, with a response of 14 replies,
(9-in favor, 1-against, 4-undeliverable). Responses were as
follows:
1. E. E. Figari-1311 Shannon Valley Dr.-in favor
2. City of Morgan's Point - in favor
3. Ann S. Monk-1052 E. Humphreys, Sequin, Tex.-in favor
4. J.L. Chapple-11618 Jutland Rd., Houston-in favor
5. M.Casteel-309 S. Carroll-against
6. George Sharp-2314 Killarney, D.P. - in favor
7. Bryan Moore-511 S. Utah - in favor
8. Can't read name-309 LaFayette, League City-in favor
9. Stanly Hootman-6408 Gulf Freeway, Hstn.-in favor
10. D. Nicolini-3020 Ave. R, Galveston, Tx.-in favor
•
• Planning & Zoning Meeting
Minutes of 3-22-90
Page 5 of 5
4. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Mrs. Graves declared the public hearing closed at 7:57 PM
BREAK - 8:00
Mrs. Graves reconvened the meeting at 8:05.
5. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING SPECIAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST SCU90-002.
A motion was made by Bobby Blackwell to allow the Special
Conditional Use Permit Request SCU90-002 and accept staff's
recommendation as follows:
(1) the 30 foot driveway instead of the 24 foot driveway
at Barbours Cut Blvd.,
(2) accept the recommendation of the 20 foot easement up
and down Broadway instead of the 10 foot,
(3) the 30 foot landscape setback requirements
The motion was seconded by Jack Gresham, all were in favor and
® the motion passed granting the Special Conditional Use Permit
to ICN.
Mr. Albrecht stated that this item would go before City
Council for their approval on April 9, 1990.
6. ADJOURN
A motion was made by Bobby Blackwell and seconded by Jack
Gresham to adjourn. All were in favor and the motion passed.
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 PM.
Respectfull submitted,
a~
Nina Browning, Secr ary
Community Development
Approved on this the ~~ day of April, 1990.
Ja t Graves, ,Chairman
P1 ing & Zoning Commission
2/23/90/neb
• • o C~~O~
0
FER 28 199
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
MEETING MINUTES ASST. CITY MANAGER
FLOW CHART OFFICE
Minutes taken at meeting a~15~yo ~
Minutes typed by a~G/90
Secretary
Preliminary Draft Copy to ~'/~~9d YL~.
Appropriate Director ~~„z o/ Q~
Final draft co t ed 1 02.E 9a
PY YP~
Final draft copy y/a~lGo ~~3
City Manager/Asst City Manager
for their review 31a,9~
I City Secretary for
distribution to City Council
I Minutes approved & signed
at next meeting
Approporiate Dept. files
original with agenda packet
l6/yo nom.
3~G ~qo ~
3~~~190
3/a3/yo ~a-
At end of one (1) calendar year
approved minutes with agenda
packet forwarded to City Secretary
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUEST #SCU90-002
.
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #SCU90-002
Requested By:
International Cargo Network
represented by Mr. Don Holloway
Inc. ,
Requested For:
Lots 1-32 and alleys of Blocks 416, 417,
418, 419, 432, 433,434, 435; All of Block
980; Lots 1-16 of Blocks 415, 420, 438,
Town of La Porte; Tyler street from the
east right-of-way of North Broadway to the
west line of the alley in Blocks 415 and
420; Madison Street from the east right-
of-way of North Broadway to the west line
of the alley in Blocks 420 and 433; Iowa
Street from the north right-of-way of
Adams Street to the south right-of-way of
North "E" Street; Kansas Street from the
north right-of-way of Adams Street to the
south right-of-way of North "E" Street;
Utah Street from the north right-of-way
of North "E" Street. (See Exhibit A) .
Zoning:
Current zoning of the property is as
follows:
Blocks 416, 417, 418, 419: PUD, Planned
unit Development
Blocks 415,
Residential
420:
R-2, Mid-Density
Blocks 432, 433, 434, 435, 438, 980:
Business Industrial
(See Exhibit B)
Purpose of the Request: To allow development of a Planned unit
Development which is to consist of a
Refrigerated (frozen food) warehouse
complex (See Exhibit C).
Background:
As this is the first Planned Unit Development (PUD) to be
proposed under Ordinance 1501, it will probably be useful to begin
this report by referring to Zoning Ordinance Section 8-100. This
section which summarizes the intent and purpose behind PUD
development guidelines, states:
Page -2-
The purpose of this district is to provide for the
grouping of land parcels for development as an integrated
coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by
parcel, piecemeal, sporadic and unplanned approach to
development. This section is intended to introduce
flexibility of site design and architecture for the
conservation of land and open space through clustering
of buildings and acti vi ties through conditional use
provisions. It is further intended that Planned Unit
Developments are to be characterized by central
management, integrated planning and architecture, joint
or common use of parking, maintenance of open space and
other similar facilities, and a harmonious selection and
efficient distribution of uses.
Analysis:
As this is an Industrial PUD, it must first be established
that the requirements of Section 10-103.4 of the Zoning Ordinance
have been satisfied. Paragraph lIall of this section states:
The intent of this Section of the Ordinance is to
establish provisions for the granting of a conditional
use permit to erect Planned unit Development -Commercial
and Industrial projects which are in compliance with the
permitted and conditional uses allowed in a specific
district in one (1) or more buildings in relation to an
overall design, an integrated physical plan and in
accordance with the provisions and procedures in this
Ordinance.
As noted in the heading section of this report, the ICN
complex is proposed for a multi-zoned tract. Approximately 16
acres (50%) of the Tract has a zoning designation of Business
Industrial. Approximately 13 additional acres (40%) has been zoned
as P.U.D. with an underlying land use designation of IICommercial
Industrial" (See Exhibit D). The intended use of the facility is
as a refrigerated warehouse complex. The SIC code designation for
this activity is 4222 (public warehousing). This activity is
listed as permitted in Business Industrial and all other industrial
zones (Section 7-500, Table A, Ordinance 1501). This activity is
therefore acceptable within the use zones for which it is proposed.
The issue of use of the approximately ten per cent (10%) of
the tract which is residentially zoned will be considered in a
later section of this report.
Page -3-
Paragraph "b" of section 10-103.4 requires a minimum project
site of five (5) acres. This tract is comprised of approximately
32.5 acres.
Paragraph "c" requires a minimum of two hundred (200) feet of
frontage on a public right-of-way. Approximately 1,340 feet of the
eastern face of this project will front on North Broadway street.
Paragraph "d" states: "No building shall be nearer than fifty
(50) feet to a side or rear property line... [which] abuts an "R-
1", "R-2", "R-3" or M.H. use district. The project as indicated
on Exhibit C, meets this requirement.
Paragraph "e" deals with landscaping, screening and surfacing.
It includes three subparagraphs:
1) Sub paragraph #1 states: "The entire site, other
than that taken up by structures or landscaping,
shall be surfaced with a material to control dust
and drainage. A review of the applicant's General
Plan indicates compliance with these requirements.
2) Sub paragraphs #2 and #3 will be considered in a
later section of this report. It can however, be
stated at this point that this project as presented
on the applicants General Plan complies with the
requirements of section 10-103.4.
In applying for a Special Conditional Use Permit to allow
construction of this PUD, the applicants, in accordance with the
requirements of section 8-401 of the Zoning Ordinance, have
submitted the following items for review by the Planning & Zoning
commission and city Council.
I) General Plan (See Exhibit C)
II) Construction Schedule (See Exhibit E)
III) Documentation regarding Property Controls (See Exhibit
F)
The Planning & Zoning commission and City Council reviews and
evaluations of the proposed project are to be based on the above
documents and are to be undertaken using Sections 8-402 of the
zoning Ordinance as a guide. The section lists ten (10) specific
review criteria. They are:
inimum project
approximately
i (200) feet of
340 feet of the
:oadway street.
arer than fifty
1) abuts an "R-
ct as indicated
g and surfacing.
:ire site, other
or landscaping,
to control dust
licant's General
se requirements.
considered in a
_ can however, be
ject as presented
:omplies with the
Permit to allow
cordance with the
Ordinance, have
Planning & Zoning
,
.
troIs {See Exhibit
&..... ,~
:ouncil reviews an~
based on the above
tions 8-402 of the
s ten (10) specific
c~
-- --,
~~
--
--
Page -4-
. 5.
~.
7.
8.
9.
1.
Adequate property control is proposed to protect the
individual owners; rights and property values, and the
public responsibility for maintenance and upkeep. (Not
applicable to this request).
2 .
The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto
public right-of-ways does not create congestion or
dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project
residents and the general public.
3 .
A sufficient amount of useable open space is provided.
(Not applicable to this request).
4.
The arrangement of uses does not unreasonably disturb
the privacy or property values of the surrounding
residential uses.
The preliminary drainage and utility system plans are
adequate based on a report from the Director of Community
Development and the final drainage and utility plans
shall be subject to his approval.
The development schedule insures a logical development
of the site which will protect the public interest and
conserve the land.
The development is in compliance with the requirements
of the La Porte Development Ordinance.
Dwelling unit requirements are in general compliance with
the applicable district provisions. (Not applicable to
this request).
The provisions of section 10-200,
procedures of this Ordinance
satisfactorily met.
Conditional Use
are considered
10. The development is in conformance with the comprehensive
. plan.
Due to the fact that this will be a single owner, single use
development, item one is not applicable to this request.
Item two deals with interior (traffic) circulation patterns
and the impact [of the development] on the traffic flow patterns
of surrounding rights-of-way. Interior circulation does not appear
to pose a problem. The development will however, have considerable
impact on surrounding traffic flow patterns.
It
1\,
i!
~
,....
Page -5-
ICN has provided the following estimate of daily volumes of
truck traffic likely to be generated by the proposed facility:
North Broadway
Drivewavs
Barbours Cut
Driveways
Near term:
30-40 trucks daily
60-80 trucks daily
75-85 trucks daily
150-170 trucks daily
Long term:
---7'
ICN's General Plan (Exhibit C) indicates four (4) driveways.
The primary (truck) access connects to Barbours Cut Blvd. While
the placement of this drive complies with Zoning Ordinance
requirements, the driveway width, at twenty four (24) feet is too
narrow. Widening this drive to at least thirty (30) feet will
bring it into compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. (See
ExhiBit G).
The City's thoroughfare plan (City of La Porte Comprehensive
Plan Vol. I Exhibit F) classes Barbours Cut Blvd. as a Secondary
Arterial. Barbours Cut is developed as a four (4) lane boulevard
with a grassed center median. Based on information currently
available, this road appears capable of accepting, without undue
disruption of traffic flow, the additional traffic likely to be
generated by the I.C.N. complex.
The three (3) North Broadway drives, while secondary will
still handle a significant amount of daily truck traffic as well
as the majority of the daily automobile traffic. These drives, as
proposed, will meet all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements.
The thoroughfare plan however, designates North Broadway as a
"Local Collector" Street. A "Local Collector" is a street which
is primarily intended "to distribute local traffic within
neighborhood areas (See Exhibit F) ." North Broadway, in accordance
with its intended purpose, is designed and constructed to primarily
accommodate local automobile traffic. I.C.N. is currently working
with Harris County, who has jurisdiction over this section of road,
on upgrading a section of Broadway running from Barbours Cut Blvd.
to the southern most I.C.N. driveway entrance (See Exhibit I). The
improvements currently proposed consist of an upgrading of the road
base and surface as well as the addition of a left turn lane at
Barbours Cut. North Broadway is to remain a two lane road. The
Broadway Barbours Cut intersection is to remain a four-way stop.
Item three (usable open space) is primarily a consideration
in residentially oriented PUD' s and is not applicable to this
request.
Page -6-
Item four (4) deals with the privacy and property values of
surrounding residential uses and should be considered one of the
central issues of this review. Section 10-103.4.e.3 states:
Developments abutting an "R-l", IR-2", "R-3" or MH
district shall be screened and landscaped in compliance
with required screening and landscaping for the specific
use involved as required in sections 6 & 7, Table B.
There are, as indicated by Exhibit B, three faces of this
proj ect which either abut or extend onto residentially zoned
property. Although designated as a PUD, the proposed ICN facility
is basically Business Industrial in nature. Further, a significant
portion of the complex will lie within a Business Industrial Zone.
The Business Industrial line of section 7-600, Table B
requires setbacks (when adjacent to residential districts) of fifty
(50f feet to the front, forty (40) feet to the side, and thirty
(30) feet to the rear. Footnote #2 to this table states:
No buildings, parking areas, loading docks, outside
storage, or refuse containers will be allowed in such
setback areas. These areas are to be landscaped with
trees, shrubs and ground cover, with a planting plan
required to be submitted and approved by the enforcement
officer.
The portion of the project which will extend into a
residential (R-2) zone is to be occupied by an employee's park.
This park is to be located on the eastern face of the facility,
south of the staging area. The intended use as an employee
recreational facility, which will also be available (by
reservation) to the pUblic, is allowable as a residential activity
(See Exhibit H). Public parks are permitted in all residential
zones, and recreational facilities are (by means of a density
bonus) encouraged within residential developments (Zoning Ordinance
section 5-800G). While the I.C.N. complex is not residential,
their proposal to develop park facilities on the residential
portion of their property is in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance.
Due to the fact that the park is located on I.C.N. property
and an integral part of the development, its other intended use,
as the landscape buffer required by Footnote #2, is also
acceptable.
,
"
\:
,)
~
I
'<
\o...,~
j"'\ I' \
'?;. I I
~~"1:;j
~~.
\ i
~J
y,,~
Page -7-
The other portion of the facility which will require a
landscape buffer, is the container staging area. The southern and
eastern faces of this area both abut residentially zoned property
(See Exhibit B). Given the overall project layout, it appears to
be within the intent of the ordinance to consider both faces as
part of the "rear" of the complex and therefore subj ect to a thirty
(30) foot landscape setback (see Exhibit G). The landscape
planting plan which is to be approved by the Director of Community
Development, will be 'a component of the Major Development site Plan
which is to be submitted for Commission approval, contingent upon
the granting of the requested Special Conditional Use Permit.
Item five (5) deals with the preliminary drainage and utility
components of the General Plan. The Director of community
Development has reviewed these items and found the preliminary
plans to be satisfactory. His findings are attached as an adenda
to this report (See Exhibit I).
Item six (6), which deals with site development, requires
"logical development" which will "protect the public interest and
conserve the land." While the applicant's General plan, as
required by the zoning Ordinance , indicates the "phase two"
portion of the proposed development. The main emphasis of this
request is on the initial development phase (See Exhibit C). The
applicant's development and construction schedule deals with this
initial phase (See Exhibit E). The schedule, while "tight",
appears to be realistic. It indicates that topographic surveys
and soil investigations have been completed and that the civil
design phase of the project is in progress.
All information provided to staff thus far, indicates a
carefully planned development schedule that adequately addresses
ordinance concerns.
Item seven (7) requires compliance with the requirements of
the city's Development Ordinance. Based on the General Plan
submitted by the applicants, this development as proposed complies
with the requirements of La Porte Development Ordinance #1444.
Item eight (8) deals with dwelling unit requirements and is
not applicable to this request.
Item nine (9) requires compliance with the special Conditional
Use procedures of zoning Ordinance Section 10-200. This section
establishes Special Conditional Use Permit application and review
procedures as well as setting conditions which must be satisfied
before a Conditional Use Permit may be approved.
Page -8-
To this date, the applicants have complied with all Special
Conditional Use Permit application requirements. The review of
this application is proceeding in accordance with Zoning Ordinance
requirements.
The final portion of this section 10-202 sets the following
criteria for application approval:
1. That the specific use will be compatible with and not
injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property,
nor significantly diminish or impair property values
within the immediate vicinity.
2. That the conditions placed on such use as specified in
each district have been met by the application.
3. That the applicant has agreed to meet any additional
conditions imposed, based on specific site constraints,
and necessary to protect the public interest and welfare
of the community.
These criteria will be further discussed in the conclusion
section of this report.
Item ten (10) requires conformity with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff, based on their review of information
thus far submitted, finds only one area of direct deviation from
the comprehensive plans' intent. This has to do with the routing
of heavy truck traffic on North Broadway and the impact of this
traffic on the adjacent commercial and residential districts. If
a portion of North Broadway becomes a commonly used truck route,
truck traffic, without careful control and monitoring, will tend
to"spill over" onto East and West Main Streets and into
neighboring residential districts.
In an effort to prevent this problem from developing, the
applicants have stated that the following steps will be taken:
ICN will construct the North/South road from Barbours Cut
Boulevard into the site. This traffic can then be primarily
focused to the North and East sections of the site and
minimize that type of movement on and off North Broadway.
Trucks can move to either side of the building entirely within
the site. Commercial interstate trucks will primarily use the
North Broadway entrance to the facility. This type of truck
traffic will represent approximately 30% of the total truck
traffic at the facility. Company policy will state, and signs
will be posted discouraging truck traffic from proceeding
South on Broadway beyond the ICN site. All points of ingress
and egress will have controlled access gates (See Exhibit H) .
, .
Page -9-
The Commission and in turn City Council, must determine,
first, whether or not the traffic control measures proposed by
degree of deviation from Plan intent is a significant concern.
Conclusion:
This application meets ordinance pre-requisites and is
therefore eligible to be considered for the requested Special
Conditional Use Permit.
As noted earlier in this report, Section 10-202 sets three
conditions for approval of a Special Conditional Use Permit. Once
again these conditions are:
1. That the specific use will be compatible with
and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of
other property, nor significantly diminish or
impair property values within the immediate
This is a determination which will be made by the Commission
and City Council based on input from the applicants, concerned
citizens, staff and the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, Development
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
2. That the conditions placed on such use as
specified in each district have been met by
the applicant.
Should this request be approved, staff will be responsible
for verifying the applicant's compliance with this requirement.
3. That the applicant has agreed to meet any
addi tional conditions imposed, based on
specific site constraints, and necessary to
protect the public interest and welfare of the
community.
Should this request be approved, Compliance with this
condition-will be verified during the Major Development Plan Review
and Construction Permitting processes.
In terms of addition conditions, staff would suggest the
following:
1) There shall be a thirty (30) foot landscape buffer, as
indicated on Exhibit G, with a planting plan to be
approved by the Director of Community Development, shall
be developed on the eastern and southern faces of the
staging area.
, .
Page -10-
options:
I)
Recommend city council approval of the request as
submitted by the applicants.
II)
Recommend City Council approval of the request with:
A) Conditions suggested by staff
B) Additional or amended conditions
III) Recommend City Council denial of the request.
IV) Table request for further consideration at a future
date.