HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-21-1991 Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commissionr
•
DISTRIBUTION/APPROVAL
OF MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING
Minutes taken at meeting:
Minutes typed by secretary:
Preliminary draft copy to
appropriate Director:
Draft copy to Assistant
City Manager's office:
Final draft copy typed:
Final copy to City Manager's
office -distributed to City
Secretary:
'Final copy to City Council: (~~~)
Minutes approved & signed at
next P & Z meeting:
Minutes filed:
ii/s9
~~n~~
MAR 12 1991
ASST. CITY MRt~Pr~F'
~1=~Ir~~
~ -al- 9/ xB
3- ~- 9/ x8
~~I4~
3-d- 9i ~.
~1 a /1 ~ c~/Q '"'?gyp ~~ ed,X
3-/5-9/ x~ ~~ pd~ ~yp
_ad~~' `m
~~.. ~ c
3-/5-9/ ~3- ~~
3-/5- 9/ ~
3-a~-9i ~
• MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
Members Present: Chairman Inge Browder, Commissioners Betty Waters, Lola
Phillips, Eugene Edmonds, Wayne Anderson, Doug Martin
Members Absent: Commissioner Paul Schaider
City Staff Present: Assistant City Manager John Joerns, Director of Community
Development Joel Albrecht, Building Official Ervin Griffith,
Community Development Secretary Nina Browning, Assistant
City Attorney John Armstrong
Others Present: Ed Noonan with Chicago Planners, Maury Stiver with Stiver
Engineering, Mark McKim with Decker McKim Realty, Bruce
Binkley of Houston, Texas and 25 La Porte citizens.
1) CALL TO ORDER
Meeting was called to order by Inge Browder at 7:00 PM.
• 2) APPROVE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19,1990, SPECIAL CALLED MEETING.
A motion was made by Betty Waters and seconded by Lola Phillips to approve the
minutes as submitted. All were in favor and the motion passed.
3) OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REQUEST #SCU91-001. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REQUEST IS TO
ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A BOAT/TRAILER/RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
STORAGE FACILITY. THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS TO OCCUPY BLK.
#199; TOWN OF LA PORTE, WHICH IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS BEING IN
THE 100 BLOCK OF SOUTH BROADWAY.
Mrs. Browder turned the floor over to Mr. Albrecht. Mr. Albrecht stated that this
was a request by Mr. Bruce Brinkley, owner of the property, to allow development
of a facility to be used for storage of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles. For
the past several years, the property has been vacant and unused. The requested
Special Conditional Use Permit is being sought under the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance Section 6-400, Table A. This table lists "Outdoor Storage" as a
Conditional Use. In order to comply with ordinance requirements, it appears that
some revision of the development plan will be necessary. The screening from
abating residential uses is not applicable to this request, this location does not
directly abut any residential zone or use. The screening of the storage area states
that the storage area must be screened from public rights-of--way, this condition must
• be met.
~ ~
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes of 2-21-91
Page 2 of 5
A third condition states that the storage area must be "grassed or surfaced to control
dust". The current surfacing appears to be gravel or shell and is partially covered
by grass. It must be determined whether this existing surface satisfies ordinance
conditions. The lighting requirement requires that lighting be directed inward onto
the property and away from adjoining property and rights-of--way. Although the
applicant's proposal does not indicate any yard lighting, there will almost certainly
be some form of security lighting on the property.
Mr. Albrecht stated Section 10-609 requires a minimum of four off-street parking
spaces for this type of use. The spaces cannot be located on the rights-of--way as
noted on the proposal, but must be located on the applicant's property. The building
location noted does not meet the setback requirements of Section 6-500, Table B.
The setback requirements are Front - 20 feet, Rear-10 feet, Side (adjacent to RO-
W) - 10 feet.
Section 10-605 specifies that commercial driveway widths be between twenty and
twenty-five feet. The gate and fencing proposed by the applicant appear to satisfy
this requirement.
Mr. Albrecht stated the Planning & Zoning Commission has three options to
• consider besides any additional requirements they might want to place on the
property. The options are (1) recommend City Council approval to the Special
Conditional Use permit, as requested by the applicant and subject to the conditions
required by the Zoning Ordinance on screening, or approval with additional
conditions, (2) recommend denial of the request, (3) table the request.
Mr. Albrecht stated should this request be granted, the applicant must submit for
review and approval a Certified Site Plan and Building Permit application. Approval
of both is required before the facility can be developed. These approvals are
contingent on compliance with all applicable conditions and City Ordinance
requirements.
PROPONENTS:
Mr. Bruce Binkley -applicant - 4801 Woodway Dr. Suite 300 East, Houston, Texas
77063. Mr. Brinkley thanked the Commission for setting this meeting to hear his
request for the development of a boat/trailer/recreational vehicle storage facility.
He said he had no problems with any of the requirements of the Ordinance and
would meet them if the request was granted.
Letters received:
Ms. Barbara Warnock - 4813 17th Street, Bacliff, Texas 77518 - in favor
Eve Mouton - 120 S. Broadway, La Porte, Texas - in favor
• L.E. Pay - 112-118 S. Broadway, La Porte, Texas - in favor
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes of 2-21-91
Page 3 of 5
OPPONENTS:
Judy Neiuwenhuis - 301 W. Main, La Porte, Texas -Against
Marie Smith - 115 S. Virginia, La Porte, Texas -Against
Mike Shanihan - 200 S. Virginia, La Porte, Texas -Against
Imogene Pulline - 116 Sylvan, La Porte, Texas -Against
Jack Jackson, Owner of 100 Main Bldg. -Against
Letters received:
Colleen Hicks - 1411 Lemon Lane -Against
Pat Muston - 117 Garfield, La Porte, Texas -Against
Ms. Kathryn Bayne - 4801 Oak Hollow, Baytown, Texas -Against
4) CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Mrs. Browder declared the Public Hearing closed at 7:25 PM.
5) CALL FOR VOTE TO APPROVE OR DENY SCU91-001.
Betty Waters made a motion that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend
to City Council denial of this Special Conditional Use Permit. The motion was
seconded by Eugene Edmonds. All were in favor and the motion passed.
BREAK - 7:25 - 7:30 pm
6) CONSIDER BAYGREEN COLONY SUBDIVISION PLAT.
At this time Mr. Albrecht suggested that the Planning & Zoning Commission move
to the front tables for the presentation by Mr. Ed Noonan of Chicago Planners and
Mr. Maury Stiver of Stiver Engineering, Inc. on the proposed BayGreen Colony
Subdivision preliminary plat. This presentation is to bring the Commission up to date
on what has taken place since the November 2, 1989 presentation.
Mr. Ed Noonan brought the Commission up to date and where the development
stands at this time. On December 3, 1990 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
granted Permit # 19128 ~ to grade, place fill, construct a drainage system and create
a wetlands area in isolated wetlands. Mr. Noonan stated they are now at the point
where they are requesting from the Commission the preliminary approval of their
plat, subject to a series of conditions which include minor variations being asked for.
At this point Mr. Noonan introduced Mr. Maury Stiver, who went over the
preliminary plat.
•
• Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes of 2/21/91
Page 4 of 5
Mr. Albrecht reminded the Commission that there are several things that need to
be placed on the final plat that are not on the preliminary plat at this time. There
will be several variances that must be considered and granted or not granted.
Basically what they are requesting of the Commission tonight is to give them the
final direction so they can get the final plat drawn and submitted. The items that
need to be placed on the final plat would be: permanent control monuments,
Homeowners Covenants, specifications for the utility/street drainage construction,
street lighting plan, variances (4 basic were submitted by the developer, letter dated
10-19-89). Additional items requiring consideration and direction by the Commission
are sidewalks, front building lines, lot sizes.
MOTIONS:
A motion was made by Eugene Edmonds to accept all the variances and seconded
by Betty Waters. All were in favor and the motion passed.
A motion was made by Betty Waters to approve the sidewalks as planned to be a
part of the 25 foot private road, approve the 25 foot building line, that at all times
• it should be as determined by and in agreement with City Staff (City Engineer,
Public Works Dept) as they define a distance to keep it clear for utility installation
and obtain a permit to cross State Hwy. 146 to connect to sewer system. This
was seconded by Lola Phillips. All were in favor and the motion passed.
A motion was made by Eugene Edmonds to approve the preliminary plat subject to
the variances and other items stipulated by the Planning & Zoning Commission.
Doug Martin seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed.
7. 1991 ANNUAL REVIEW OF ZONING ORDINANCE 1501.
Mr. Albrecht stated Ordinance No. 1501, the Zoning Ordinance, requires an annual
review. Our Zoning Ordinance has been reviewed twice and it's time once again for
the annual review. Staff has presented several items that need to be considered in
the review. Items are as follows: New Definitions (Section 3-100), Residential Uses
(Section 5-700, Table B), Commercial Uses (Section 6-400, Table A), Industrial Uses
(Section 7-600, Table B), Special Regulations (Section 10-300 thru 10-609), Sign
Regulation (Section 10-1000).
Mr. Albrecht also stated that two letters were received pertaining to the review of
the ordinance. The letters were from Mr. Huber, requesting special zoning
consideration on his property on Broadway Street and Mr. Mark McKim on Business
• Industrial zoning setbacks.
•
• Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Minutes of 2-21-91
Page 5 of 5
Mr. Armstrong stated that there were two others items that came through his office.
They are the relationship of building permit, zoning permit and other permit
approvals. Mr. Armstrong said he felt these areas should be tighted up. The second
thing would be to establish a potential procedure for revocation of the zoning permit.
Mrs. Waters stated she felt there was a need to review the carport requirements and
fencing. She said she had heard complaints on these two specific items for years and
wondered if there was not a need to review them at this time. Mr. Albrecht stated
that these items would be put on the agenda for review during a study session.
Mrs. Waters also suggested that the Commission become more familiar with the
Neighborhood Commercial property and its meaning. This would also be a good
item for discussion during the review.
A study session was set for March 7, 1991 at 6:00 PM for beginning the review of
the Zoning Ordinance.
MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION
Mrs. Browder requested volunteers to serve on the Main Street Committee from the
Planning & Zoning Commission. It was suggested that three people serve from the
Commission. Mr. Doug Martin and Mr. Wayne Anderson volunteered and Mrs.
Browder is akeady serving on the Committee. The first meeting with the Main
Street Association was scheduled for 9:00 AM, February 27, 1991 at Roelof s.
8. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Eugene Edmonds and seconded by Lola Phillips to adjourn.
All were ~in favor and the motion passed. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
a.
ina Browning, Secretary
Community Development
Approved on this the of l s~ day of ~f3'QGf~f' , 1991.
CQ~~,tiOrit'GeLt~
In Browder, Chairman
3/4/91/neb
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
#SCU9~-OO~
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
'SCU91-001
Requested For:
Block 199; Town of La Porte (See Exhibit
A)
Location:
100 Blk of South Broadway
Zonina:
General Commercial (GC)
Reauested By:
Mr. Bruce Binkley, Owner
PurDose of Reauest:
To allow development of a facility to be
used for storage of boats, trailers and
recreational vehicles.
Backaround:
Block 199 is a triangular shaped block which is located
immediately north of the Old Harris County Courthouse at the
"Five Points" intersection (See Exhibit A). The block is in
large part paved with concrete (See Exhibit B). The paving is
the remnant of the gasoline service station which originally
occupied the block. More recently, the property has been used
for used car sales. For the past several years, the property has
been vacant and unused. As noted above, the applicant is seeking
to place a boat, trailer and R. V. storage facility on the site.
The requested Special Conditional Use Permit is being sought
under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 6-400, Table A.
This table lists "Outdoor Storage" as a Conditional Use. Section
6-600.B sets the following specific conditions for Outdoor
Storage uses:
1. The area is screened from view of neighboring
residential uses or an abutting residential
district in compliance with Section 6-600(A).
2. Storage is screened from view from the public
right-of-way in compliance with Section 6-
600(A).
3.
Storage area is
control dust.
grassed or surfaced to
4. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed
that the light source shall not be visible
from the public right-of-way or from
neighboring residences and shall be in
compliance with Section 7-501(1)a.
Page 2 of 5
Section 10-202 also establishes a set of general conditions
which apply to all Special Conditional Use Permit Requests. The
conditions are as follows:
1. That the specific use will be compatible with
and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of
other property, nor significantly diminish or
impair property values within the immediate
vicinity.
2. That the conditions placed on such use as
specified in each district have been met by
the applicant.
3. That the applicant has agreed to meet any
additional conditions imposed, based on
specific site constraints, and necessary to
protect the public interest and welfare of
the community.
Analysis:
The applicant's development proposal is included in this
report as Exhibit B. In order to comply with ordinance
requirements, it appears that some revision of the development
plan will be necessary. Staff has enclosed as Exhibit C, a copy
of the applicant's proposal which has been amended to reflect
Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Regarding the conditions of Section 6-600, the first
requirement (screening from abating residential uses) is not
applicable to this request. As indicated by Exhibit A, this
location does not directly abut any residential zone or use.
The second condition, which also deals with screening,
states that the storage area must be screened from public rights-
of-way. It further states that the screening standards of
Section 6-600 shall apply. These requirements are as follows:
Page 3 of 5
A planting strip shall consist of evergreen ground-
cover, and shall be of sufficient width and density to
provide an effective screen. The planting strip shall
contain no structures or other use. Such planting
strip shall not be less than six feet (6') in height.
Earth mounding or berms may be used, but shall not be
used to achieve more than two feet (2') of the required
screen.
Standards
a. Width of planting strip - four feet (4').
b. Type of planting - evergreen.
c. Size of plants - Minimal height of four (4') at time
of planting. Must reach a height
of six feet (6') within two (2)
years.
d. Planting density - Such that within two (2) years of
normal growth, a solid screen will
be formed to a height of at least
six feet (6') above adjacent grade.
The third condition states that the storage area must be
"grassed or surfaced to control dust." As indicated by Exhibit
B, the southern end of the block is unpaved. The current
surfacing appears to be gravel or shell and is partially covered
by grass. It must be determined whether this existing surface
satisfies ordinance conditions. As this site is surrounded by
streets, all sides of the proposed facility will require
screening (See Exhibit C).
The fourth condition requires that lighting be directed
inward onto the property and away from adjoining property and
rights-of-way. Although the applicant's proposal does not
indicate any yard lighting, there will almost certainly be some
form of security lighting on the property.
Some additional ordinance requirements which must be
observed are indicated on Exhibit C. They are as follows:
Section 10-609 requires
spaces for this type of use.
right-of-way as noted on the
on the applicant's property.
a minimum of four off-street parking
The spaces cannot be located on the
proposal but, must rather be located
page 4 of 5
The building location noted does not meet the setback
requirements of Section 6-500, Table B. The setback requirements
are Front; 20 feet; Rear; 10 feet; side (adjacent to R-O-W); 10
feet. Under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 3-100,
this tract is considered to be a "through lot" with both the
Broadway and San Jacinto Street faces subject to front setback
requirements. Exhibit C indicates the building relocated to a
point which complies with minimum setback requirements. This
location is noted as an illustration of minimum setback and not
as a specific required building location.
Section 10-605 specifies that commercial driveway width be
between twenty and twenty five feet. The gate and fencing
proposed by the applicant appear to satisfy this requirement.
Regarding the general conditions established by Section 10-
202:
1) That the specific use will be compatible with and
not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property...
The determination of whether the request satisfies this
condition must be made by the Commission (and in turn City
Council) based upon input from the applicant, citizen comment and
their knowledge of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
2) That the conditions placed on such use...have been
met by the applicant.
As presently proposed by the applicant
are aspects of the facility which would not
requirements. So long as the applicant is
required changes, the facility can be made
applicable requirements.
(Exhibit B), there
meet Zoning Ordinance
willing to make the
to conform with all
3)
That the applicant has agreed to
additional conditions proposed...
meet any
Should this request be granted, the applicant must submit
for review and approval a Certified Site Plan and Building Permit
application. Approval of both is required before the facility
can be developed. These approvals are contingent on compliance
with all applicable conditions and City Ordinance requirements.
Page 5 of 5
Options:
A. Recommend City Council approval of SCU91-001
1. As requested by the applicant, subject to the
conditions of Section 6-600.
2. With additional conditions.
B. Recommend City Council denial of SCU91-001.
C. Table SCU91-001 for further consideration at a future
date.
01/30/91 12:06
U'713 965 0239
14I 002
--
CITY OF LA pORrE
APPLICATIOl~ FOR
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
-------------------~-~~~----------~._----~------------~------
" Application No.: -
OfFICE USE OW~Y: Fee: S100.00 Date Received:
Rec.eiptNo.:
Certified Plans Submitted:
(~ General Plan () Major Development Site Plan
( ) Minor Develop~ent Site Plan ( ) Preliminary Plat
------------------------~---------------------------------------~-----
Per~on Making Request: . Bruce Binklev
Mailing Addre~~;
4801 woodwav Dr.. Suite 300 Rast
City/State:
. Ho., Tx. 77056
Phone:' 961-01~1
_"_ "_,.- o.BUSzNE'SS '~AME:- . (.Proposed.).-o La.. Porte-SQOrts. 'Center.
...---- - "'1:':"- ..
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ZONE:
TYPE OF BUSINESS:
Broadwav & San Jacinto
Lot 199 City of La Porte
SIC USE CATEGORY:
sale and stora e of boatsr
and recreationa~ vehicles
Dac_ 12, 1.999
Date
-------------~~--------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date . of Z PUblic Hearing: Recommendation: Y N
P & or
Date of" Ci.ty Counell Meeting: Approved: Y or N
. .zoue :-. .- -
..-.-.
This ap~lieation is: Approved ( ) Denied C }
Permit # -
CLP JOB #
(If Assigned Yet)
ConditionS:
Zoning Administrator
Date
CED/1-~81
..
81 HI
GC
]
I
~
LI
81 GC
R-2
R..I
R-I
!II
BI
f-- SC LA ~ {-DO l
R-I
R-2
ac _rslT A
01/30/91 12:Q7
fr713 965 0239
14I 003
~
! .
T
I
I
\ DEnLOPMENT PLAN FOR",A PORTE SPORTS CEN'rER
\ Concret~and asphalt presently cover
most of t~e area and no additional
topping i'\.~lanned. .
I do plan.....~ fence the enti.re area with
a 6' fenc~, ,and also add suitable
lighting'fo~\security purposes.
Off street p~ki~g is available on
both Broadway-~'t. and San Jacinto Dr.
portable bui.1:tling location is shown
the southwest\ corner. .
., .' ,...
0:
\
\ .
us
~
,
\
\ \
\ TEXAS FISH ~ GAME COMMISSION
BUILDING. \. .
14 l
".-
'S_
."
~1b
.~~
~A
~O
,
'.
\.
\
,
\. .
\
1
i
':, I'.
5
s
\
'\'
..
~
,
\
-
t-
O')
>-
<t:
:3=
~
<
o
0::
c:c1
Ffmt. .,.~
r
- -\
'\.
"
s
7
"
.
'4-~- .
J
9
~ IZI.56,
tt: Cl.\1ItI F.k\
~ SOUTH " A II STREET
~ (All" u-- "'t;.~"')
HARRIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE
lWTI nnl~
, \
't....~'6.T; ,- .\..1;0~ t.e:"!~ ~,~ ~~ . R:;:~..~
....IBIT H
01/30/91 12:~7
5"713 965 0239
141 003
.; .' ...
PLAN FOR', LA PORTE SPORTS CENTER
\,
Concret~and asphalt presently cover
most of t~e area and no additional
topping i\.~lanned. .
I do plan....~ fence the entire area with
a 6' fenc~, ,and also add suitable
lighting 'for\security purposes.
Off street p~ki~g is available on
both Broadway'~t. and San Jacinto Dr.
portable bui.1p.ing location is shown
the southwest.~ corner. .
\ -., -
\( ~
\
\ ,.
U'
~
,
\
\ \.
\ TEXAS FISH ~ GAME COMMISSION
BUILDING - \. '
r
"S_
'V
~>b
.~~
~:;A
~o
'-.
\\
\ .
.
\
.\
,
.
,
\
....
- -\
'-
"
'4-~- .
~U..ILnllJq LO~"'T'lON
. "'1)..\. So:e:'T 13AC!.t!.s
;F
:l SOUTH " A II STREET
~ (411' ,~- \t.~~~l
HARRIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE
1:111 Tl n all';:
\
~,,,.,,,C',-6.'C ,. J,..'\=-::' ..~-:~~ ~,~ ~; . Cit~~
...... C
BAYGREEN COLONY SUBDIVISION PLAT
PRESENTATION BY MR. MARK MCKIM
647 Shoreacres Blvd.
.
La Porte, Texas 77571
.
(713) 471-4580
DECKER McKIM, INC., REAL TORSID
January 30, 1991
RECEIVED
;2- 1- CJ /1LfJrr.
COMM.DEV.
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of La Porte
604 West Fairmont Parkway
La Porte, Texas 77571
RE: Annual Zoning Ordinance Review
Dear Chairman:
As an active participant in the ongoing development of
La Porte, our firm would like to respectfully submit for your
commission's review several guidelines within the present
zoning ordinance that warrant reconsideration.
We at Decker McKim, Inc., Realtors are continually
contacted by both companies making initial inquiries about
La Porte and companies already committed to relocating within
La Porte if the right land or space is available. The
majority of these companies would be classified within the
industrial parameters of our present zoning ordinance.
This activity has allowed us to become very familiar
with the guidelines of the three industrial zones. We
believe that while the Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial
guidelines are practical and serve the city and new
businesses well, the Business Industrial ("B-1") guidelines
as they pertain to setback parameters demand your
commission's attention and reconsideration.
Specifically, we recommend that the B-1 setbacks
be reestablished as follows:
Setbacks
Front - 30ft
Rear - 15ft
Side - 15ft
The present 8-1 guidelines, in their practical effect,
severely restrict development in 8-1 zones to only large
tracts of land. As a result, smaller companies seeking to
locate to property that happens to lie within 8-1 zoning are
faced with the unfortunate choice of either moving to a
less restrictive zoned property, which typically requires a
larger capital expenditure, or not locating in La Porte.
F8r example, consider the typical 100,000 square foot
[B
REALTOR-
Serving the Real Estate Industry for a Quarter of a Century
/
platted block and a company needing a five thousand square
foot (5,000 sq. ft.) building. If the block is zoned "Light
Industrial" the company would require a 75 foot wide by 125
foot deep tract of land (9,375 sq.ft.).
In a B-1 zone, in accordance with the present
guidelines, the company would require a tract with 225 feet
of frontage by 125 feet deep (28,125 sq.ft.). Under this
scenario, the B-1 property must be three times as large and,
because of the setbacks, the building would have to be 35
feet from front to rear and 142 feet from end to end, with
only a 17% lot coverage. For practical applications, this
does not make sense.
The situation improves slightly if the alley can be
closed, increasing the tract's depth to 266 feet. However,
because of setbacks, a minimum of 100 feet of frontage is
required, and the total tract still must be 26,600 square
feet, allowing only a 18% lot coverage.
Using our proposed guidelines, the above described
scenarios are greatly improved. The company buying within
a revised B-1 zone, without the alley closed, would only
require a tract 100 feet wide by 125 feet deep, totalling
12,500 sq.ft. (as opposed to 28,125 sq. ft. ) and allowing a
40% lot coverage (as opposed to 17%). Under the scenario
closing the alley, the tract would be reduced to 75 feet wide
by 266 feet deep, totalling 19,950 sq. ft. (as opposed to
26,600 sq. ft.) with lot coverage increases to 25% (as
opposed to 18%).
We feel very strongly that these proposed guideline
changes will greatly assist in further promoting the smart,
healthy economic growth of our community.
Thank you for your time and your positive response to
this matter.
Sincerely,
)1)1 JJ/JJ ()~
Hark McKim
~99~ ANNUAL REVIEW OF
ZONING ORDINANCE ~SO~
1.
New Definitions (Section 3-100)
A) Accessory Use
B) Conditional Use
C) Non-conformirrg Use
II. Residential Uses (Section 5-700, Table B)
,
,
Setback requirements adjacent to single use side yard
utility easements.
III. Commercial Uses (Section 6-400, Table A)
A) Dog Grooming as a General Commercial Use
B) Major (SIC) Group 47-Transportation services as
General Commercial Use.
IV.
Industrial Uses (Section 7-600, Table B)
Business Industrial Setbacks
V.
Special Regulations (Section 10-300 thru 10-609)
A) Non resident fencing requirements
B) Accessory building setbacks Large lot
residential
C) Update code reference applying to swimming
D) Driveway requirements as they apply to "Large Lot
Residential"
E) Exterior Storage
VI. Sign Regulation (Section 10-1000)
Review of portable sig~ regulation (P&Z minutes of
7/19/90) .
Sign placement in regards to utility easements
01/30/91 12:06
.... .....
U'713 965 0239
141 002
....
crry OF LA PORTE
APPLICATIOl~ FOR
SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
~---~--------------~-~~~-----------------~-----------~~------
, Application No.: -
OFFICE USE OW~Y: Fee: $100.0n Date Received:
Receipt No.:
Certified Plans Submitted:
(~ General Plan () Major Development Site Plan
( ) Minor Develop~ent Site Plan ( ) Preliminary Plat
------------------------~---------------------------------------------
Person Making Request: . Bruce Binkley
Mailing Address: 4801 Woodwav Dr.. Suite 300 Rast
City/State:
. Ho., Tx. 77056
Phone:' g61-01~1
-'- '-.". '.BUS:ElffiSS 'NAME:- .(.Proposed.).: La.. Porte.SPOrt.s' 'Center.
..---- - -~- ..
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
20 NE ;
TYPE OF BUSINESS:
Broadwav &. San Jacinto
Lot 199 City of La Porte
SIC US~ CATEGORY:
saLe and stora e of boa:ts~
and recreational. vehicles
Dac_ 12, 1.999
Date
-----~------~~--------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date . of Z PUblic flearing: Recommendation:
P &. Y or N
Date of' city Council Heetic.g: Approved: Y or N
. Zone :-. -- -
.'--.--.
This ap~lication is: Approved ( ) Denied C }
Permit # -
CLP JOB =I
(If Assigned Yet)
Cond.itions:
Zoning Administrator
Date
CED/1-~87