Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-29-1993 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission MINUTES CJ • MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 29, 1993 Members Present: Chairman Betty Waters, Commissioners Dottie Kaminski, Inge Browder, Wayne Anderson, Ronald Gragg, Howard Ebow Members Absent: Eugene Edmonds City Staff Present: Planning Director Chuck Harrington, Assistant City Manager John Joerns, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong, Chief Building Official Ervin Griffith, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee Others Present: I. CALL TO ORDER B. Don Skelton, Allen Schubert Meeting was called to order by Chairman Waters at 7:00 PM. II. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 18, 1993 PLANNING AND ZONING • COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING. A motion was made by Inge Browder to approve the minutes of the March 18, 1993, Public Hearing and regular meeting. The motion was seconded by Wayne Anderson. All were in favor and the motion passed. III. CALL PUBLIC HEARING TO ORDER. THE PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO CONSIDERAMENDMENTS TO THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE 1501. A. SECTION 3-100: NEW DEFINITION OF PORTABLE SIGN. B. SECTION 6-400, COMMERCIAL TABLE A: MINI-WAREHOUSE STORAGE (SIC 4225) AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONES. C. SECTION 10-1000, SIGN REGULATIONS: REPLACE THE EXISTING SECTION 10-1000 WITH A NEW SECTION 10-1000 WHICH WILL REGULATE PORTABLE SIGNS, POLITICAL SIGNS, FREESTANDING AND ATTACHED ON PREMISE SIGNS, OFF PREMISE SIGNS AND REAL ESTATE SIGNS. • • • Page 2 of 14 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 Chairman Waters called the Public Hearing to order at 7:01 PM. Mr. Hamngton read from the staff report the following proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance: A. Section 3-100 Definition of Portable Sign A sign which is not permanently and rigidly affixed or attached to the ground and is designed or constructed to be easily moved from one location to another, including signs mounted upon or designed to be mounted on a trailer, wheeled carrier, or other non-motorized mobile structure. This definition shall also include any vehicle or trailer parked so as to be visible from a public right-of--way for the primary purpose of advertisement of products or directing people to a business or activity located on the same or nearby property or any other premises. B. Section 6-400, Commercial Table A Would allow mini-warehouse storage (SIC 4225)as a Conditional Use in General Commercial Zones. C. Section 10-1000, Sign Regulations Section 10-1001 General Provisions All signs shall be erected, displayed and maintained in compliance with the requirements of this section and all other applicable state laws and City Ordinances. If there is a conflict between the regulations of this section and a state law, City ordinance, or codes adopted by ordinance, the most restrictive standard applies and controls. All signs not expressly allowed by this ordinance are prohibited. 2. No sign nor part of any sign may have lights which flash, move or rotate in such a manner as to be confused with traffic control signals or emergency vehicle signals, or in a manner that confuses, misleads or distracts traffic motorists. Beacons may not be placed on any sign or be made a part of any sign. Additionally, no sign that resembles an official traffic control sign, signal or device or that bears the words stop, go slowly, caution, danger, detour, or other wording for traffic control signs or devices may be used within the City. U Page 3 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 • 3. All signs shall be properly and continuously maintained so as not to become a safety hazard or detract from the appearance of adjoining properties. 4. All areas immediately below and within a radius of fifteen (15) feet shall be properly maintained. This includes- maintenance of all vegetation to the standards set forth in Chapter 13, Article II of the City of La Porte Code of Ordinances. 5. No sign may be placed on or over a public right-of-way, whether used or unused, a utility easement, or on utility poles. 6. No sign shall be located in a sight triangle so as to obstruct traffic visibility at a level between three feet (3') and six feet (6') as measured above adjacent road grade. 7. Any sign in violation of any provisions of this ordinance are subject to • immediate removal by the City of La Porte. Section 10-1002 Portable Suns 1. Portable signs may be located in the High Density Residential (R-3), Manufactured Housing (MH), Commercial Recreation (CR), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), General Commercial (GC), Business Industrial (BI), Light Industrial (LI), and Heavy Industrial (HI) Zoning Districts. 2. A portable sign may not stand on any premise for more than thirty (30) consecutive days at a time or for more than sixty (60) days in any calendar year without a period of at least twenty (20) intervening days. 3. Lighted portable signs shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the requirements of the City's electrical code. Portable signs with red, yellow, amber, green, or blue lights or with lights that flash, blink, or vary in intensity are prohibited. • • • Page 4 of 14 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 4. Portable signs must comply with the setback requirements that would apply to on-premise signs in the zoning district in which the portable sign is to be located. Portable signs may not be placed on public right- of-way and may not be placed in such a manner as to create a hazard to traffic. 5. A portable sign must be tied down or secured in a manner prescribed by the Building Official to ensure the safe installation of said sign. 6. A portable sign, during the required intervening periods, must be completely removed from public view. Removal of the lettering is not considered to be in compliance with this section. 7. All damaged portable signs must be removed within forty-eight (48) hours of notification by the City until said sign has been repaired. 8. Portable signs shall be used for on premise use only. 9. Nothing in this section shall apply to political advertising. • 10. Portable signs are to be permitted through the Building Official of the City of La Porte, consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. Permitted portable signs shall have securely affixed and plainly visible a sticker, in form prescribed by the City of La Porte, showing the date the permit was issued, and the date the permit is to expire. Portable signs shall also contain on both faces the date of expiration of the current permit. 11. Portable signs located on premises in violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance, including the requirement that portable signs have attached a validly issued, current permit from the City of I.a Porte, are subject to immediate removal by the City of La Porte. Portable signs removed by the city of La. Porte in accordance with this Section, shall be safely and securely stored by the City of La, Porte. Portable signs removed and stored by the City of La. Porte may be redeemed by their owner upon the payment of a storage fee of fifty dollars ($50.00). Signs not redeemed from storage maybe sold by the City of La. Porte in accordance with laws and regulating sale of • abandoned property. Page 5 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 429-93 • Nothing in this Section shall be construed as a waiver by the City of La Porte on the penal enforcement of this Ordinance. The remedies provided in this Section shall be in addition to, and not cumulative of, other remedies. the City of L,a Porte might have as allowed in this Ordinance and state law. • Section 10-1003 Political Sim Temporary political signs placed for the duration of an election campaign shall not be subject to the requirements of this ordinance except that: 1. No political sign shall be placed within a sight triangle or in a manner which will otherwise create a traffic hazard. 2. No political sign shall be placed on or over a public right-of-way, whether used or unused, a utility easement or on utility poles. 3. All portable signs used for political advertising shall be anchored in a manner which will prevent their being blown about by a strong wind. 4. All political signs shall be removed no later than ten (10) days after the election for which they were placed. In the case of run-off elections, political signs may remain in place no longer than ten (10) days following the run-off. Section 10-1004 On Premise Signs 1. Freestanding On Premise Signs A. General Provisions (1) These regulations shall apply to freestanding signs only (2) Multiple reader panels mounted on a single base shall be considered to be a single sign. • • Page 6 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 • (3) For the purposes of this section, amulti-tenant building shall be considered to be a single establishment and shall be restricted to free standing advertising signage in accordance with the regulations governing such signs. {4) Separate buildings located on a single piece of property may be considered to be separate business establishments with each building being eligible for freestanding advertising in accordance with these regulations. (5) The number of on premise free standing non-advertising signs intended to direct traffic and not exceeding six (6) square feet in size shall not be limited by this section. (6) The provisions of this section shall not apply to real estate signs. • B. R-1, R-2, R-3, and MH Districts (1) One (1) free standing identification sign is permitted for townhouses, multi-family developments, group care facilities, subdivisions, education and religious facilities. (2) For a Bed and Breakfast facility one (1) sign not exceeding three (3) square feet in area and non- illuminated shall be allowed. This sign may be either mounted on the building or located in a landscaped portion of the yard. (3) For a Home Occupation facility one (1) sign not exceeding two (2) square feet in area and non- illuminated shall be allowed. This sign shall be mounted flat against the wall of the principal building. (4) The size of the sign may not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet. (5) There are no minimum yard setbacks. • • Page 7 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 • (6) The maximum height is forty-five feet (45'). C. CR, NC, and GC Districts (1) One (1) freestanding advertising sign shall be permitted for each side of a commercial establishment which fronts on a developed right-of--way. (2) The following size limitations apply: (a) Free standing signs for single tenant buildings - 150 square feet. (b) Free standing signs for single tenant buildings in a controlled access corridor - 300 square feet. (c) Free standing signs for multi-tenant buildings - • 350 square feet. (3) The following rrummum yard setbacks apply: (a) When not adjacent to residentially zoned property, there are no minimum setbacks. (b) When adjacent to residentially zoned property, there are minimum side and rear yard setbacks of five feet (5'). (4) The following height limitations apply: (a) Free standing signs - 45 feet. (b) Free standing signs in a controlled access corridor - 65 feet. D. BI, LI, and HI Districts (1) One (1) free standing advertising sign shall be permitted for each side of a commercial establishment which fronts • a developed right-of-way. • • Page 8 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 (2) The following size limitations apply: (a) Free standing signs for single tenant buildings - 150 square feet. (b) Free standing signs for single tenant buildings in controlled access comdors - 300 square feet. (c) Free standing signs for multi-tenant buildings - 350 square feet. (3) The following minimum yard setbacks apply: (a) When not adjacent to residentially zoned property, there are no minimum setbacks. (b) When adjacent to residentially zoned property, there are minimum side and rear setbacks of five . feet (5'). (4) The following height limitations apply: (a) Free standing signs - 45 feet. (b) Free standing signs in controlled access corridors - 65 feet. 2. Attached On Premise Signs A. General Provisions (1) One attached sign per building wall maybe displayed for each occupant or use on the premises. (2) These regulations do not apply to building addresses or supplemental signs for the purpose of identifying the apartment buildings or units. • • Page 9 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 B. R-1, R-2, and MH Districts • (1) The size of the sign may not exceed three (3) square feet. (2) No portion of the sign may have a luminous greater than 200 foot candles and may not move, flash, rotate or change illumination. C. R-3, CR, NC, GC, BI, LI, and HI Districts (1) The cumulative size of the signs may not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the wall area. • (2) If located closer than 50 feet to an R-1, R-2, or MH District, the sign may not flash and must be designed so that is does not shine or reflect light into adjacent residences. (3) One attached canopy sign may be displayed. Such sign shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the canopy area. Such sign must be contained within the physical limits of the canopy and shall not extend above or below the canopy. Section 10 - 1005 Off Premise Signs 1. Off premise free standing advertising signs may be erected in the BI, LI, and HI Zoning Districts. 2. Off premise freestanding public service signs may be erected in the GC, BI, LI, and HI Zoning Districts. 3. All off premise signs shall be constructed with a single steel support pole. 4. The following size limitations shall apply to all off premise free standing signs: Page 10 of 14 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 \J A. In controlled access corridors, the size limitations shall be set by the Texas Highway Beautification Act. B. On all other streets, the maximum size shall be three hundred (300) square feet and may not have more than two (2) sign faces. 5. An off premise sign must be located at least fifty (50) feet from an existing freestanding on premise sign. 6. Off premise signs, when illuminated, must be constructed with upward shielded directional illumination. 7. The following height limitations shall apply: A. Off premise public service signs - 18 feet. B. Off premise advertising signs - 45 feet. • 8. All off remise freestandin advertising signs shall be spaced in P g intervals of not less than one thousand (1,000) feet. Section 10 - 1006 Real Estate Signs 1. For the purpose of marketing a recorded subdivision, one (1) on premise freestanding sign of not more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet for each road abutting the respective subdivision shall be permitted, provided that such sign shall not be placed within any required yard nor within twenty-five (25) feet of any property line abutting a street or road right-of--way, and further provided that such sign shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. • • • Page it of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 2. For the purpose of marketing a recorded subdivision, one (1) off premise sign of not more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet may be permitted for each recorded subdivision in any zoning district. Such sign shall not be placed within twenty-five (25) feet of any property line and shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. The permit for such sign shall expire, unless renewed, two (2) years after the date of issuance of such permit, and provided that each request for permit shall be accompanied by a license and permit fee posted by the respective sign hanger in the amount of three hundred dollars (300.00) for the purpose of ensuring proper location, maintenance, and removal of the respective sign. Section 10 - 1007 Permits 1. Any person desiring to erect or place a free standing, attached or portable sign on any property shall first apply to the Building Official for a permit. Permits are not required for signs less than five (5) i square feet in area. 2. Any person applying to erect or place a free standing sign on any property shall submit to the Building Official the following information: A. A survey of the property which indicates the proposed sign location. B. An engineered design for signs greater than 8 feet in height. C. A design of the sign and its support member for signs less than 8 feet in height. 3. Permit fees shall be in accordance with the current City of La Porte Fee Schedule Ordinance. Section 10 - 1008 Enforcement 1. Any violation of this Section shall be subject to the penalties provided in Section 11-700 of this Ordinance. • Page 12 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 u B. Don Skelton, of Skelton Realty, spoke in favor of signs relating to the marketing of real properties by individual owners or real estate brokers or agents. Mr. Skelton wants to be able to advertise property by providing small directional signs for traffic seeking the property. Allen Schubert, developer of Glen Meadows Subdivision, agrees with Mr. Skelton. He feels that homebuilders, in order to inform the public of available housing, should have the opportunity to place small bootleg direction signs. He would be willing to abide by restrictions placed by the City, such as number of signs, and particular times they may be displayed. The ordinance amendments, as proposed, do not make allowances for this type of sign. IV. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING • Chairman Waters closed the Public Hearing at 7:25 PM. V. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING AMENDMENTS PROPOSED FOR ZONING ORDINANCE 1501 A motion was made by Inge Browder to recommend to City Council approval of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments. The motion was seconded by Ronald Gragg. All were in favor and the motion passed. VI. CONSIDER GENERAL PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE BAYOU FOREST SUBDIVISION WHICH IS TO BE A 309 LOT SUBDIVISION FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS TO BE DEVELOPED ON A 100.43 ACRE TRACT WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE MCCABE ROAD, HIGHWAY 146 INTERSECTION. THE PROPERTY ZONING IS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD). Mr. Harrington addressed the Commission regarding the General Plan of the Bayou Forest Subdivision Phase III. The property is designated PUD which requires the applicant to submit an application for a conditional use permit. Staff has reviewed the plan and finds it not to be in compliance with the Development Ordinance. The • following is a list of items which will require revision or modification: U Page 13 of 14 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 1. Specify type of development. 2. Include block for filing date. 3. Plot utility easements. • 4. Revise the designation of "Unrestricted Reserve A." 5. Plot utility easements. 6. Plot building setback lines. 7. Indicate flood plain designations and boundaries. 8. Complete and submit a Development Checklist. 9. Submittal of an application for a Conditional Use Permit. • 10. Renaming streets. Due to the significant amount of items that are unresolved, staff recommends denial of General Plan approval. Jim Gartrell, with Gulf Coast Engineering and Surveying, addressed the Commission. Mr. Gartrell stated that the proposed development would have lagoons with lakes running behind the development. The lakes would be operated and maintained by the homeowner's association. The lakes would have fresh water and would be stocked with fish. The yards would abut the lakes. A complete tree border would surround the entire lake. All lakes would be interconnected to satisfy all retention requirements for drainage. All lots are interior cul de sacs. Mr. Harrington stated that the park area falls short in size by approximately 1/2 acre. Mr. Gartrell confirmed there would be no problem dedicating the extra acreage. Mr. Gartrell stated the lagoons would be deep enough so that grass would not grow on the bottom; approximately 6-7 feet deep with a 3:1 slope. The streets will be paved and guttered. The utilities will be located in the street right-of--way. One (1) well will be drilled to maintain a constant level in the lakes. The homeowner's association will pay for the electricity to power the pump. • Page 14 of 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of 4-29-93 Ed Cooke, the developer, stated the homes would sell for $90-140,000.00. Homeowner's fees will be targeted at approximately $200.00 annually. The lakes will be stocked with 500 fish per acre which will help control the mosquito population. Ronald Gragg made a motion to deny conditional approval of the General Plan until such time that all the items staff noted are addressed. The motion was seconded by Howard Ebow. All were in favor and the motion passed. VII. STAFF REPORTS There were none. VIII. ADJOURN Chairman Waters declared the meeting duly adjourned at 8:15 PM. • Respectfully submitted, Peggy Planning Department Secretary Approved on this the 20th day of May, 1993 Bet W ters Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman • • • REZONING REQUEST #R93-001 BAYOU FOREST SUBDIVISION PHASE III • • • 'Rezoning Request #R93-001 . ` ... :> Requested For: A 107.356 acre tract of land out of the W.P. Hams Survey, Abstract Number A-30. The property in question is located at the southeastern corner of the McCabe Rd./Hwy. 146 intersection (see Exhibit A). Current Zoning: PUD (Planned Unit Development [Exhibit B]) Requested Zoning: 94.4768 acres to R-1, Low Density Residential 12.8792 acres to GC (General Commercial) Requested Bv: Bayou Forest Property Ltd., property owner • Background: The tract in question is a portion of the area that formerly comprised the Bayshore Municipal Utility District (Bay MUD). This area was annexed into the City of La Porte on December 31, 1988 (Ordinance 1626). Following annexation, the Planning and Zoning Commission began a planning study of the former Bay MUD area. This study resulted in an integration of the former district into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Based on the Comprehensive Plan determinations, permanent zoning designations were assigned to the entire annexed area. This was done by passage of Ordinance 1501-J (adopted June 12, 1989). The PUD zoning designation was assigned to the tract in question with the passage of this ordinance. The land use designation underlying the PUD zoning was established as Low Density Residential with a Commercial use node located in the vicinity of the McCabe Rd./State Highway 146 intersection (see Exhibit C). It is important here to note that the Land Use Plan from which Exhibit C is excerpted, does not establish hard boundaries. It rather illustrates patterns of development envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. • • • Rezoning Request #R93-001 • Bayou Forest/5-2A-93 Page 2 of 3 Analysis: • Zoning Ordinance Section 8-100 states that the purpose of the [PUD zoning] district is to provide for..."development as an integrated coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, sporadic and unplanned approach to development." The PUD zoning assigned to the tract in question was to great extent based on the large amount of undeveloped, unsubdivided acreage located in this area. The PUD development requirements were an effective means to insure that development of the tract in question would be in accordance with sound planning guidelines. The applicant, Bayou Forest Property Ltd., is seeking this rezoning to provide for development of a residential subdivision (for single family homes). This would be located on the 94.4768 acres for which the R-1 zoning is requested. GC zoning is requested for the remaining 12.8792 acres which is located along Hwy. 146. This portion of the property to be designated as Reserve A is to be divided into 8 commercial lots. Staff, in reviewing the applicant's request, has found it to be partially compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision is to be a planned, platted, and deed restricted development. This is the type of development that PUD guidelines were established to encourage. The subdivision is for single family homes. This is in accordance with the intent of the Land Use Plan. The commercial reserve is not directly in accordance with Land Use Plan intent. There are some significant planning issues which must be considered and resolved before staff can support any rezoning request. These issues largely relate to the portion of the tract designated as Reserve A. As proposed, Reserve A extends south from McCabe Rd. approximately 2,400 feet. The reserve, as noted is to be divided into 8 commercial lots. Lots A-1 through A-7 would be approximately 200 feet deep. The eighth and largest lot, which is not identified, is deeper and would presumably have access from both McCabe Rd. and Hwy 146. A-1 through A-7 would only be accessible from the northbound lanes of Hwy. 146. • Rezoning Request #R93-001 Bayou Forest/5-20-93 • Page 3 of 3 • The relatively shallow lot depth of Lots A-1 through A-7 does not allow for an adequate buffer between the commercial and residential areas. This could result in dumpster pads, delivery docks, and similar items being located in close proximity to homes. Additionally, as access would be limited to the northbound lanes of Hwy. 146, southbound traffic could only access commercial establishments by making a "U-turn" at the Shoreacres Blvd. cross over. This would obviously result in traffic safety problems. • Also to be considered is the proposed location of the community park adjacent to Reserve A. Again, close proximity to commercial development and the accessory activities associated with commercial establishments could serve to render the park somewhat less desireable than it might otherwise be. The depth of the commercial lots does not allow adequate circulation. Finally, staff feels that a designation of GC could allow for too broad a range of commercial activity. As proposed, Reserve A would have the potential to develop into a significant commercial district, as opposed to a district for retail shops which would primarily serve the neighboring residential subdivisions. • Conclusion: As noted, this request has a great deal of merit and is partially compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. However, based on the planning issues noted above, staff recommends denying rezoning request until such time as the noted issues have been addressed and resolved. Staff would suggest, as a means of resolving these issues, reconfiguring Reserve A. If the reserve were shortened and deepened (maintaining the ratio of commercial to residential property), the resulting commercial zone would have improved access from both McCabe Rd. and Hwy. 146. The additional property depth would allow for adequate buffering from homesites and in conjunction with a possible designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial) yield a retail district more conducive to meeting the needs of the surrounding proposed and existing neighborhoods. • • BAYOU FOREST PHASE GENERAL PLAN • III • • Staff Report Bayou Forest Subdivision -Phase III May 20, 1993 General Plan (Resubmittal) The Planning and Zoning Commission, at their April 29, 1993, meeting, reviewed the General Plan for Phase III of the Bayou Forest Subdivision. The Commission disapproved the plan as submitted. The applicant has resubmitted a revised General Plan. A reduced copy of the revised plan has been included in the agenda packet as Exhibit A of the preceding staff report. Staff, in reviewing the original General Plan submittal, noted a series of items which needed to be amended, added or clarified. These items are as follows: 1. Specify type of development. 2. Add block for filing date. 3. Plot utility easements. • 4. Revise the designation of Unrestricted Reserve A. 5. Plot building setback lines. 6. Indicate flood plain designations and boundaries. 7. Complete and submit a Development Checklist. 8. Submit a Special Conditional Use Permit application. 9. Rename designated streets. The applicant has addressed the above noted items. Rather than request a Special Conditional Use Permit, the applicant has requested a rezoning of the subject tract. This satisfies item #8. Item #4 is, however, still at issue. The applicant, as requested, has clarified the designation of Reserve A. Staff, in the preceding rezoning report, raised a series of planning issues regarding Reserve A. These concerns were in large part based on the information provided • • ,. , Page2of3 • Bayou Forest Staff Report/5-20-93 on the revised General Plan; specifically dimension and arrangement of commercial lots and driveway arrangement. As these issues have a direct bearing on both the General Plan and rezoning request, it would not be appropriate for the Commission to grant approval or conditional approval of the General Plan as presently drawn. There is additionally one other item which should be addressed. This regards the benchmark notes on Sheet 4 of the General Plan (this sheet is not included in the Commission's agenda packet). The first note "NGS K120 (1973) 9.43' references a National Geodetic survey monument. The location of this monument should be noted. The second note, "City of La Porte B.M.#62 10.86" should be deleted. Also to be noted, Section 6.01 of the Development Ordinance will require that a minimum of one (1) permanent survey control monument be shown at the preliminary plat stage for each five (5) acres platted. One (1) monument is to be accurately tied to an approved City of La Porte monument by angle and distance, at the General Plan stage; reference to a City of Ia Porte monument is not necessary. i Finally, the applicant is to provide the City (and Harris County Flood Control) a report regarding the lagoons proposed for storm water detention. This report is to detail detention capacity, provisions for mosquito control and responsibility for maintenance and upkeep. As of the date of this writing (5-12-93), the applicant has not yet submitted the requested report. If the report is submitted prior to the May 20, meeting, staff will provide copies to the Commission. Development Ordinance Section 4.O1.C empowers the Planning and Zoning Commission to take three courses of action after reviewing a General Plan. They are as follows: 1. Approval: Commission approval of the General Plan authorizes the developer to file a Preliminary Subdivision Plat or a Development Site Plan. 2. Conditional Approval: Commission conditional approval requires submission of an amended General Plan and additional documentation as specified by the Planning Commission for final Commission approval; which may be filed concurrently with the next Preliminary Plat or Development Site Plan, as the case may be. • • Page 3 of 3 . Bayou Forest Staff Report/5-20-93 3. Disapproval: Commission disapproval of a General Plan requires submission of a new General Plan. Based on the planning issues raised in the preceding rezoning report, staff must recommend denial of the Bayou Forest Phase III General Plan until such time as it has been revised to reflect the noted concerns. C] • •~ • REPEAT REQUEST BAYSIDE TERRACE AND BAY OAKS SUBDIVISIONS n • • ,. , • Staff Report Request to Replat Sections of May 20, 1993 Bayside Terrace and Bay Oaks Subdivisions Requested For: Parts of Lots 11, 12 and all of Lot 13; Block 22; Bayside Terrace Subdivision. Lot 9; Block 13; Bay Oaks Subdivision. (See Exhibit attached) Requested Bv: Randolf and Cathy Valentin, property owners. The tracts described above are adjacent lots that had been combined to form a single homesite. A house and garage are situated on the Bayside Terrace lots. A swimming pool is located on the Bay Oaks lot. The property owner has resplit the property. The lots containing the house have been sold. The owner has retained and intends to build a new home on the lot in the Bay Oaks Subdivision. The owner is seeking to replat the • property. The replat would remove approximately 3,922 square feet from Lot 13; Bayside Terrace and add the property to Lot 9; Block 13; Bay Oaks. The purpose of the requested replat is to add approximately 53 feet of bay frontage to Lot 9 in Bay Oaks. The City's Development Ordinance No. 1444 and state law allows for a replat or re- subdivision of a recorded subdivision plat, or a portion thereof, but without vacation of the immediate previous plat, is hereby expressly authorized to be recorded and shall be deemed valid and controlling when: A. It has been signed and acknowledged by only the owners of the particular property which is being replatted or resubdivided. B. It does not attempt to alter, amend or remove any covenants and restrictions. C. There is compliance, when applicable, with Section 212.014 and 212.015 of V.T.C.A. local government codes. D. It has been approved by the Commission after being prepared and filed as though it were an original plat as specified in Section 4.04 of the Ordinance; and • • •~ Page 2 of 3 • Replat Request Staff Report/5-20-93 • E. All expenses incurred by the City or the subdivider in the Replat process shall be borne by the subdivider, including costs of notice of public hearing (as there is no need for a public hearing, this provision is not applicable). Staff has reviewed the proposed replat and finds that the following revisions will be necessary in order to comply with City of La Porte requirements. A. Document should be identified as a replat of both the Bayside Terrace and Bay Oaks Subdivisions. B. Identify the boundary between the two (2) subdivisions. C. Add a vicinity map to the plat. D. Add recording language and signature blocks as required by Ordinance 1444. E. Provide a letter making the request and stating the purpose for the replat. • There is a five foot 5' utility easement which runs along the northern property line of Lot () 9 in Bay Oaks. If the requested replat is approved, this easement will bisect a portion of Lot 9. As the applicant is not seeking to relocate or abandon this easement, it has not been considered as a factor in this request. Normal Zoning Ordinance setback requirements will apply to any structures built in proximity to this easement. The Development Ordinance authorizes the Planning and Zoning Commission to take the following actions when considering replat requests. The Commission may within thirty (30) days of the filing date, take one of the following actions. 1) Approve the Final Plat as filed; 2) Disapprove the Final Plat as filed, provided the reasons for such disapproval are stated in writing and a copy of the statements is signed by the Chairman of the Planning Commission. Commission action shall be noted on three (3) copies of the Final Plat, which shall be distributed to the developer, Department, and official files of the Commission. C • • ~~ Page 3 of 3 • Replat Request Staff Report/5-20-93 Final Plats: Effect of Approval 1) Approval of a Final Plat as filed and all accompanying documentation by the Commission, together with approval of Public Improvement Construction Documents by the Director shall result in issuance of a Development Authorization by the Department which permits the developer to begin construction of subdivision improvements. Not applicable in this case because it does not involve construction. 2) Disapproval of a Final Plat requires filing of a new Final Plat. If approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and once the changes to the replat are made and approved, the Chairman shall sign and release the replat for recordation with a return map agreement. This replat complies with applicable City of La Porte Ordinance and State Law. Staff • recommends approval subject to the revisions listed in this report being completed. • • EXHIBIT BAYSIDE TERRACE/BAY OAKS REPEAT • • Rand W. Valentin 3201 Bayshore Blvd. La Porte Texas 77571 • May 13, 1993 Mr. Charles Herrington Planning Manager City of La Porte P.O.Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77572-1115 Attention: Mr. Phil Hoza Dear Sirs: The purpose of this letter is to request the replat of my property in La Porte. I currently own a portion of Lot 13, Block 22, Bayside Terrace as well as Lot 9, Block 13, Bay Oaks. Both properties are in La Porte and are adjacent to each other. There are no lien holders on either property. The reason for this request is to align the two portions into one lot that is similar to others adjacent to the area. Once this is completed, it is my intention to build on the replated lot. • I have attached a survey showing the two properties with the old border separating them. As you can see, the combined single property is more normal is shape to others in the Bay Oaks subdivision of La Porte. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, '~~~G-- Attachments • U EXHIBITS L_J I. REZONING REQUEST #893-001 II. BAYOU FOREST, PHASE GENERAL PLAN III • ~° 'I . «.~ o r I: ' °"ii' N fl = A A Y Mp u C L _- gip! v S ~ 1 6~~ii ii _ D V x n -.___._.. -- N N ~ 1 • f~~'~ ~ I ~f~l r ~-Q U ~ ~ 4a ~ ~ << r ~ ~~ m ~ ~" ~ ~ & I ~~ I ~ ~ IV N I x I I I ~~ Illx ~~ i' m ~~ o ; m 0 ~ '1 rj O A q z ~ z z c~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ H f!1 to N z° ~ '~Ne A N W frl ~ . .. .I I 1 - I .O, I ~•. .~ __..I I O ry ~ /~VF ~ ~ . _ ~ . fl m -i ._..._sil I I w I I N I ~. '°._~. ~ "1 1L..i m y ~~~ r,~2e~92 _ _ b /1 p ~ ~I~I I • ~ 14 I (~.°_._I /~ N ~ _~...1 I\\ ._Fi~n 1 °Q6/O/e ryC'rF ~ ._... NI I u- I ~ I •~ I rl .I 1 I ~`Y..-t- ~~ n-i ~( / I ~ c SAC $f SI. ~n_' ~ ~..u_al ~1 IN-- ~„ i +_I-~ I u I ~ ~-•1 ~" '°"I"~~ o ~. ' °~s N ~ 6r' =~~~~ p ~~ ~o;~ir~3 .~ 1 ~ - ._..---- _~.yr zleoa 1 r. N~ .. _..._ .., II ~` p 1 -l ~ / 200 p0.° Ye ~+1 A ~a al 1 .. ~ , w M ~ ~ l i ~" 1 ~ A -'~ T' ~ r -D I 1 / i ° ~i t 1 •v ~~ .I y, 1 ~ ,y .... I ~ ~ m p -- - f • n v f, ~i _ _ I _ I . ...I. w ---1 at F I B • I a I ~~ ° I I Is• u. . I __. - a I - ~~ ___ _ I -- " 1.--- y ., ... 1) I _L V.-I . u _. i _ I I- ~ 1 ~ BO. ~. _.... I.. .I I COMMUNITY I e I S y ~ O i 7 e \ w ..__~ ~ n I I ~ _ I I N ~ I'~~ I .- PARK _ - -~ -- _ e ~O \ ~I 1 .I'.. B0 I O I Iw'e' ,f •~-1 ~' le' ,~ w-~ -_ YAYUU YORCiT URI VL' 9 •'• a' ID B.l.l IS t,~ - . __._ .-. _ If~1 bRtOU fORL aI UNIVE ~I 1 '13 00 •q .a• g ~,.,te avJ 1 - .~ BO' I - I I OO• ~_ ..L_- ! u - ~' N -_ -. .. _._. -. _ ~ I I T 4 N O V O V ~~n O • 4 N ~~ i- --~ 3991 ~ .~ n ~ - ~ w u N _ __.. I'_ -.._ ~. IP UL \ IY el I~ ~' ~ ]1 - k Q ~N_-..-~--~ I w ° " ° ° I u I ( " I ~' $ LAGOON N0.1 ~ i0 eAYOU F IusT move 'a - I ~„ I Ii' U.E. ~ 16~ OL. _ ~ Iso go ' ~ __ ~ -: -__ --- I - I y - ---_ ~ - - fll ---I. EI le• uY. a Ir sL.. I __ ~ ~ - - - - _ - - - - I_ S Y ~ $ LAGOON N0.2 ~ L... I " M -- I~ F \~ ~ u n V s u $ tl ,~, tl fl \` _ _ _ _ rr (IJ ~ y ~ N u • 411 v ~ ' - y~ ~ .~ bYJ Y.. ~ ~ -- :) N I ~ ~ ~ D -- tlAYUU LLMOOR CI RCLC STREET ~ " , F I- ~~ • - - -^-. ~ /~ ~~+~ L- ~~ ~ ' --I ~ .-_ __ .I ~ m -- _ w ~ _ __ loo• • .! - _ _ I . -- Noi.r riiACK LiI1LLS i ~ ~ ~ I i ----I' I _ - - -_ a ~~ ' , ~ II ~w/, -u yyc INy yy yL ,fj ~ OA 4 .... ..-. _. ...,fl ...... I- I ly I, YI • Til N ~ O ~I lIV l;._.~FI- Yl~ ~-. ~ n 1 Ys ~~ _ - - -- _ - _ _ _ '-w-i i n V 01 V S$ ~ I ._-._-_ ._. ...._-~ _ ^ iw ~- 1{' U.L . le' eL o _. _..... ~ LAOOON N0.2 I ~--_- I- I = _ ~, J .4b . __-...._..i pr z • ~ f*1 I ~ I 811 - - - - - - - --^ ~7 I ~jI `~ I '~ -. ~ fil _ - ~ I ~ ~ O i g~g $ ..- D i ...~_.J. I y N al • ~ 1 ^ I-_N I... I ..l-N _.j F ~ / y - - _ /,1- !e . ,y- I I I T1 I )~ 9 _ "•mn ~ - a ~i ~.. ~ .. seA~lu+~Q AtacLE .. ® 1...° .. I I- , -` - I I o • e°• FV -4 N ~ O V O n • N I I ~ ix ~ cn - ' P~- al r - - % ~'' ac ~ p I--~- I -F--i F - - ~ ~ l = ... y , \ -_ __. _ - Gl- V n fil • Y N 8 e0' ~ PJ O" UY e+- °I If X751 ~ ~ (.1 YI ~~~ , _ ~ _ _ _ - __ -_ ._-. Y' ~ •_!le ;a i:NeKK Cove _ - .. . - Q J' -_ ~I Lq ~ N l .. 1 ~.L a le• RL. ~ 9] et • IOY 1-=• ~°. "1 • Ya q ~ N I •CI ~ -'- -- -'i + a 1 & cti.J1L ]ib oo.{{.. L ~ T~l]•._ .-_i'IY ie `~ togl. ~ , v 'I - ~ ~' _ _ ~0~~\ __-_ I io 1! l f°'_~ e' •I~_-1 ~ ~ ~ ~I I e0• I __~ 5 -~ _i C f3 ~ ~ j _ - n ° - ~ - " J ~ I eo• 1. ° >: 1 00• ~ ~'I __ ~ ~ I =1 . ~ . ~ 1 .. -I ~ -- _ _.. ... .._-_u ~.. _.y _... Ir T N I I V - YI I N I ~ it • w r \ 1~- O T i Y1 .0'IY-f e)O le ._ ..- _ __ t _ v _ 4 I a~Nr l 4 I 1 ~ I u ~ I ~F I.. •y '~' `o. ] u ° ~ I n _~ _ I ~~~~~~ ------- _-_I ~ ~' j ^ i ~t 1 i ~F I F' ~a_~ I Q F ,e I]' e~° ~ c u~ "r~ -{ R M n M °M a~ 1 V 1` Y 1 u ~ I ~'~ i. • ~ ,_,a~l e. • ~ I ae. ~~ ~~ Y YMn 7 n 1 IP _ I ('7 ,1.~ M w I 'po I] ~_I]9 ~] Yt y~ ~~1 I CCCfi{ D A A R O4 I \ O\`I `/ , ld OI 1 ~ D ~ Z~ O ~ ;~, l~ F ~~m rs ° rn m o 1~~Y1 g s ~_ _ ~ r :o p .1 _. ' , Ol .1 1 rn 4 b 1 U :U .U ~p7C ~T n w ~ •'tv I (1 D rn : ~ ~ i' 4J / n \ z ~ H ""I I ~ o -i D ' ...~k : ~6~f r ......... •..n .•. •n. n.n r+. m. (1 f f I ~ 30 5 «' ~ o ~.,ax5,., 1 WBweRC~~Se ~ ~1 I " - • n ( ~ ~ m ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~. 04~~JO1 IA~CGI~•OWOJNM~MN4" y C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f ~ i7 ' 1&iI 1 .. nrOVOJJWNrJGG~~NYGG7 Y l ., ~I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ -o ~ GULF COAST ENGINEERING BAYOU FOREST o ~ m ~- ~ -~ D l -~ ~~,y-.= Sr4j ~A.' :~ ~~ ~:.:o~ ~frr ~ ~ ~:.w ~:~~a~ ~; ~iM ~j~~ ~~''^~ AND SURVEYING eo.eox ]e2 LA MAROUE,TEXAS 7?566 PHASE THREE -MASTER PLAN ~ d+'' '~"o'•t ~ Fj~#~ ~9 JAMES 91f GARTRELL JR P E RP S TEIEPNONE NuMOfRS LA PORTE HARRIS %OUN Y TEXAS T ., ,. S ~ ~~ FO~ ~ • ~+ . , . , , ' ;~i+1 (• ' OATEN REV fEKASGtT-~09-831-tc6t - 5/5/93 NODS TON- 71~-e0i-6969 ~- _ < - ~ `~ ~~ LEGEND ;~ ,,, MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING ~ R•I LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL R-2 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL_ R-3 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 'i'~ NC NEIGH80RHOOD COMMERCIAL GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL 81 BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL PARK Ll LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. HI HEAVY INDUSTRIAL PUO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • ZONING MAP .. ~ NC ~~ R-I ~....~ • ~~6 / ~s /OG10 ~ EXHiBif ~ .. ~~ I ti~~~ i ~ Q/ / ~ ~~. - ~ - ~ ~~~ s i'~- I • I I a ~---_r_~~~~ ~A PORTS E.T.~~. LIMIT Jf s 1I~ f ...... i t~ ~p~ ~ 1~ ~~~ 4~~ ~~ ~~' I i°o°o~ goo ~~ = goo r ' oC I ~ a ,~ ~~ ~ ~ o~ + 1 0< y I • 1 UTH LA PORTS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT A N ~CTOBER,EI998Y ~ SO ORDINANCE 1789 PASSED ON THE i4 th DAY 0 ~ ~ CITY OF LA PORTS LAND USE PLAN ~~ LEGEND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CONTROLLED ACCESS HWY. ZONE 5001 ALO"~~- t~ PARALLEL TO HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLIC USES ~_~ LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES :::::.::::::~~~~~~ MID TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES . • • • • • COMMERCIAL USES o~~~ooaooooo0o COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL USES ~~~ INDUSTRIAL USES ~~ ~~ ;~:l :~: i X71 ~F1 i ~ ---- \~, . ~?i:\.:iiiii:. ~~'!~:::::::ii:. ~~~:::::ti::... ~~~ ~~~ :F ..• R•11:::. • , y • :: F siii« :~ :; '• ,~.. :11[V: .Y ~ ~ AAY . ~ _ ~ ... REf pVE. a. ! .:.::.:.: . ~, ~, y ~: fl ~, ~~ •, SHOREpCRES p(HIBIT ~