Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-29-1994 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission• • MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER • 29, 1994 • • • MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 29, 1994 Members Present: Chairman Betty Waters, Commission Members Chuck Engelken, Dottie Kaminski, Eugene Edmonds, Inge Browder, Mazgazet Anderson, Howazd Ebow Members Absent• City Staff Present: Director of Planning Chazles Harrington, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee, Secretary to City Manager Cazol Buttler Others Present: Numerous citizens I. CALL TO ORDER Meeting was called to order by Chairman Waters at 6:00 PM. II. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Waters opened the public hearing at 6:01 P.M. A. CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING CONVENED AT THE SEPTEMBER 15, 1994, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS TO CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SCU94-001, WHICH IS REQUESTED FOR AN 87 ACRE TRACT OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 700 AND 800 BLOCKS OF NORTH 13TH STREET AND THE 900-1400 BLOCKS OF HIGHWAY 146 NORTH. THE PERMIT IS REQUESTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING LIVESTOCK TO BE PASTURED ON THE SUBJECT TRACT. Mr. Harrington presented staffs report. He noted that although not related to this request, an issue had been raised regazding the expansion of Southern Pacific's railyazd facility. He also noted that although the property is owned by Southern Pacific, the company is not directly involved with this request. This request in no way deals with any expansion or modification of the existing railyard facility and the only issue is whether the subject tract can be used as pasture for livestock. • • • • Page 2~of 8 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 Mr. Harrington stated staff feels that by placing conditions on the Special Conditional Use Permit, the use of the property as pasture can be done in a way that will not be detrimental to the adjacent neighborhood. With this in mind, staff recommended approval with the following conditions: Fencing adjacent to Bazbour's Cut Blvd., North 13th Street and North "H" Street (Fair Lane) shall be setback at least 25 feet from property lines. Fencing adjacent to Highway 146 shall be erected along the proposed right-of--way lines established by the State Highway Department. There shall be no access from the developed portions of the "H" Street and 13th Street rights-of--way. Additionally, gates shall be located at least 100 feet away from residential homesites. Final locations shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. • Driveways, conforming to City requirements shall be installed between gates and adjacent developed roads. Water troughs shall be located as neaz as possible to western property boundaries. Final locations shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. Applicant shall secure written permission from Southern Pacific allowing water service lines to cross any property not covered by the applicant's lease. Permission must remain in effect for duration of the applicant's lease. A copy of the permission letter shall be submitted to the City for attachment to the applicant's Conditional Use Permit. The 25 foot buffer azeas adjacent to Bazbour's Cut, 13th Street, "H" Street, and the adjacent undeveloped right-of--way shall be maintained by the applicant. They shall be mowed a minimum of once each 30 days. Dedicated rights-of--way shall remain unfenced and unobstructed. • • • • Page 3 of S Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 Property designated for use in the F-101 drainage project shall remain unfenced and unobstructed. Applicants shall, prior to erection of fencing, submit to the Director of Planning, a letter from Houston Lighting and Power Company stating that arrangements for access to the property are adequate and satisfactory. As an alternative, the "H" Street right-of--way can remain unfenced and unobstructed. Animal concentration shall not exceed one (1) animal per each 1.75 acres of pasture area. This concentration limit shall apply to each separately fenced pasture. This permit shall be valid for a period of one (1) year from date of Council approval. At the end of this period, the applicant shall apply for a new Special Conditional Use Permit. • At such time as the applicant's lease with Southern Pacific is • allowed to lapse, or is terminated by either party, this Special Conditional Use Permit will become void and all livestock must be removed from this tract. Chairman Waters announced a public hearing had been convened on September 15, 1994, regarding this item. At that time, the Commission heard comments from numerous citizens. The Commission voted to defer this item until the next regular meeting. Chairman Waters invited everyone to speak at this meeting even if they addressed the Commission at the previous meeting. The following includes everyone signed up to speak during this public hearing. 1. PROPONENTS Ms. Hayes, of 704 N. 13th, would rather see this property used for livestock than some sort of industry. Harold Mathews (the applicant), of 4005 Polk in Deer Park, agrees with staff's recommendation with the exception of keeping the rights- of-way unfenced. This would create seven pastures and would not be feasible for him. • • • Page 4 of 8 Planning 8c Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 Linda Mains, of 808 N. 12th, is agreeable to the request but is concerned that the permit might provide a gateway for Southern Pacific expansion. Ralph Mains, of 808 N. 12th, is agreeable to the request, however, feels the cattle would bring flies. He would like to see them fed and watered from the 16th Street side of the property. 2. OPPONENTS Richard Watkins, of 804 N. 13th, is concerned since there is no grass where Mr. Mathews has cleared, that ultimately, a large mudhole will be created. Sabino Ornelas, of 710 N. 13th, believes the livestock would create mudholes, which would harbor mosquitos. Manta Jackson, of 708 N. 13th, stated she grew up on a farm and in no way would they have considered having livestock so close to their home simply because of the noise, smell, and flies. Dr. Tchokev, of 832 S. Broadway, is not sure what Mr. Mathews' reason is for wanting to use this property as pasture land since his lease with the railroad must be renewed annually. Lisa Honeycutt Cook, of 630 N. 13th, is opposed to the request. Freddie Akins, of 809 N. 12th, is leery of the railroad coming in and closing streets. Chairman Waters closed the public hearing. At this time, Chairman Waters suspended the agenda and acted on Item IV. (See Item IV.) • • • • Page 5 of 8 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 B. CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SCU94-002, WHICH IS REQUESTED FOR AN 11.79 ACRE TRACT LOCATED IN THE 800 BLOCK OF MCCABE ROAD. THE PERMIT IS REQUESTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS TO BE UTILIZED AS A TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITY. Mr. Harrington reported Bradley Womack and Melanie K Liska of Rescue Concepts, Inc., are the applicants. Their business specializes in training municipal and industrial response teams and if approved, their facility would be utilized as an emergency response education facility and company office. The property is located in the 800 block of McCabe Road. The zoning for the property is Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) with an underlying land use designation of Low Density Residential. The proposed development is referred to as a P.U.D. Mr. Harrington stated that a P.U.D. zoning designation requires a specific review and approval process. The process gives developers some flexibility in design and use of the site and also allows the City to mandate design criteria and property controls necessary to protect surrounding properties. This flexibility and control is intended to create developments that can co-exist and enhance surrounding properties without conflicting with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff, based on the applicants preliminary submittal, feels this development can be developed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. However, since this was only a first submittal and any additional documentation would have to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, staff did not make a recommendation either to approve or disapprove the permit. Chairman Waters reminded the Commission the request was for approval of a preliminary submission. In doing so, it would not be granting approval for construction. Chairman Waters reopened the public hearing at this time. 1. PROPONENTS Bradley Womack, President of Rescue Concepts, stated this would be a clean facility. There would be no burning or chemicals of any type. • The tower height mentioned in their proposal is flexible. The height ~ i~ Page 6 of 8 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 mentioned was not meant to be an absolute. Mr. Harrington noted that maximum height allowed by the Zoning Ordinance is 45 feet. Melanie Liska, educational coordinator for Rescue Concepts, resides at 502 SE Beltway 8. Ms. Liska described the types of people who would be trained at their facility as safety managers, technical operators, and health care professionals. Mike Ferrell, of 6514 Coldstream in Pasadena, is a part-time instructor for Rescue Concepts and is employed full time for the Lubrizol Corporation. He stated there would be no noise initiated from this location. He added their company trains throughout the United States and also volunteers for training at Texas A & M at Lamar University. Mr. Ferrell anticipates an influx of personnel coming to the facility and needing accommodations which would benefit the local economy. 2. OPPONENTS • Mr. Harrington read a letter written by John Black, Editor of the Bayshore Sun. In his letter, Mr. Black, acting as a private citizen and not as . Editor/Publisher for the Bayshore Sun, expressed opposition to this request. Mr. Black's letter is attached to these minutes. Mr. Harrington added there were 33 notices mailed to surrounding property owners. Eight were received in opposition of the request and one was received in opposition from a resident that was not on the mailout list. Steve Null, President of the Shady River Civic Association, addressed the Commission on behalf of the residents of the Shady River Subdivision. Mr. Null reminded the Commission that when the area was annexed by the City of La Porte and zoned a P.U.D. with an underlying land use of Low Density Residential, it was intended to allow for the development of residential housing and businesses conducive to that, such as a comer grocery store, cleaners or other residential oriented business. Jim Zoller, of 907 Hackberry, believes the development would be inconsistent with La Porte's zoning regulations and guidelines. It is also inconsistent with what Shady River residents were told at the time • of annexation. In addition, it is inconsistent with Shady River's interest • • Page 7 of 8 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes of September 29, 1994 in preserving property values. Mr. Zoller read briefly from a Bayshore Sun newspaper article dated April 30, 1989. The article noted that during annexation proceedings, plans called for an R-2, Medium Density zoning, but several Shady River residents asked for an R-1 zoning that would better blend in with the current Shady River residential area and the Planning and Zoning Commission agreed unanimously. Albert Stock, of 919 Hackberry, presented a petition on behalf of 123 Shady River residents, urging the Commission to deny the permit request. (The petition is attached to these minutes.) Mr. Stock is concerned that there will be a detrimental effect on the attractiveness and marketability of the property in Shady River. Carol Harrington, of 1002 Hackberry, stated that it is projected that La Porte will be built out in the next 10-15 years. She feels that homes should be built where homes were designated and that commerce and industry should be kept separate. • Wayne Acton, of 625 Juniper Drive, feels that R-1 zoning is vital to our city and is opposed to this request. James Livingston, of 815 Hackberry, wants to protect his single and largest investment, which is his home. He is in total opposition to this request. Bob Capen, of 807 Oak Leaf, expressed his total opposition to the request. Kylan Lewis, of 1019 Oak Leaf, wants the property to remain available for residential homesites. Dale Kelly, of 926 Hackberry, expressed his opposition to this request. Sam Morrow, of 1010 Hackberry, thinks the property has many trees and doesn't know why more trees would need to be planted. III. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. Chairman Waters closed the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. • • • • Page 8 of 8 Planning 8t Zoning Cpmmiecion Minutes of September 29, 1994 A motion was made by Mazgazet Anderson to recommend to Council, approval of preliminary submission of Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU94-002. The motion for preliminary submission was seconded by Howard Ebow. The motion passed with Mazgazet Anderson, Dottie Kaminski, Howazd Ebow, Eugene Edmonds, and Inge Browder being in favor of the motion and Chuck Engelken and Betty Waters in opposition. IV. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #SCU94-001. After Commission discussion, a motion was made by Inge Browder to deny Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCU94-001. The motion was seconded by Eugene Edmonds. All were in favor of denying the permit with the exception of Howard Ebow who voted to approve the permit. V. STAFF REPORTS • There were none. VI. ADJOURN Chairman Waters declared the meeting duly adjourned at 7:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Pe Lee Planning Department Secretary Approved on this the 20th day of October, 1994. B ty T aters Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman • • September 29, 1994 To: Members Of The La Porte Planning & Zoning Commission From: John Black RE: Proposed Commercial Development on McCabe Road Ladies and Gentlemen: Let me start by saying that I am writing as a private citizen, not as editor/publisher of The Bayshore Sun. I want to express my opposition to the proposed commercial development on McCabe Road. While I understand that many of my neighbors have signed petitions in opposition to this spe- cialuse permit, my opinions have absolutely nothing to do with the fact that I live in Shady River. I would feel the same way if I lived in Fairmont Park. A few years ago, many of us in the old Bay Municipal District asked the City of La Porte to "take us in: ' We did so for several positive reasons, not the least of which is that we would have someone to go to when we had a problem. We were in need of "representation," and we are now fortunate to have the Planning & Zoning Commission represent our best interests, and the best rests of this community. I ask you to consider our best interests in making your decision con- ning this request. My opposition to this plan stems not from the possibility of a 75-foot tower overlooking my neighborhood; not from the possibility of sirens or whistles or the like being used in any type of emergency drills; and not from any fear of chemicals or other harmful materials being used in these drills or training sessions. To be honest, I don't even know if any of these things will be used, and that does not matter to me. My opposition, instead, comes from the fact that, in my opinion, our city needs all of the avail- able quality land it can find for residential development. We continue to encourage economic growth, but we have very little quality land available for housing -- single family residences, patio homes, townhouses and the like. This area on McCabe Road, contrary to what the people who want this training facility may tell you, would be excellent for such residential use. The land in question has an underlying designation of low density residential. There is a reason for that -- it is what best fits the property. While I would welcome and encourage this firm to build their facility in La Porte, I am confi- dent they can find a more suitable commercial site, and leave this prime residential tract for what it is best intended -- a place for houses, not classrooms. We are running out of residential space, but we certainly have no shortage of commercial space. • .. ~ ~ ~ WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF • SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION WISH TO MAKE OUR CONCERNS KNOWN TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF LA PORTS ,AND THE LA PORTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES IN ZONING DESIGNATION OF 11.74 ACRES ON McCABE ROAD (SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 1 /4 MILE NORTH ON McCABE ROAD FROM OLD HIGHWAY 146, ON PROPERTY Il~~IMEDIATELY NORTH OF AND ADJOINING SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. THE PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY DESIGNATED "PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), WITH AN UNDERLYING DESIGNATION OF R-1" (BASICALLY, SINGLE FAMII,Y DWELLINGS). • A REQUEST IS BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR A SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL RESPONSE TEAMS. THIS USE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERLYING "R-1" DESIGNATION OF THIS AREA, NOR IS IT A DESIRABLE ACTIVITY IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO OR CLOSE BY A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. LA PORTS HAS UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AVAILABLE FOR ACTIVITIES SUCH AS THIS. LA PORTS HAS A LIMITED NUMBER OF DESIRABLE AREAS AVAILABLE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF LA PORTS WOULD BE BEST SERVED BY RETAINING THE "R-1" DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY AND NOT ALLOWING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY. • • • ! THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. ~..~ ~~ Zz 1~~~~0 ~ -~ L.EAKNE C, .Ti i~cK 914 HACKF3r~e 2 • .1.~ °A^ f-~/~L-~P-f /I~ ,~,2 .~ ANN )t ~i~~ c~ ~' - 9~rJ'7Z1i~/ J 2 G 9 q ~ c ,~ ~ ~ 9~9 f~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~'~~ 4~~ NACKer,e,ey vE z v~ qis !-~ac~bevwu Ave z~ ~+s ~~a s a~B ~ ~ ( ~~f~ %~N S Ay ~3a /t /nom .5'¢.-N.~, 930 rr~ , /f~~R~ ~acl~r/? c f: ~ 2g u~ ~ .~ a1•,G s ~ 1~~ ~~~~~~. J~~ ~z~e%`~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ .. • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL • RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. 9~ c ~~r- rcoRRow l~i~ ~o ~1~~K~3~dR R / `~~~ .y[ll Vltt./ ~~l j~~~~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~!1~--.~ • • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL RESPONSE TEAMS JACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. li~30ak Lecif'~ve.La tbo,-~,~ CI/2g~9~ ,~~~lz~l. • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL • RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE r~l~ I/ ~~c.~~~~~ 9~~ ~d//cam l~ne--- ~~?~1:~~ /?~~.~.~ !s ~. ~-- ~~ ~y~s ~ 1 c! .J /" ~ ~ 1 1 4 Lv ~~ ~ i ~ ~ -~ ~• f GI. t~.~ Q Q,v- ~D~rt+r, ,+,^.s~ ~ ~ . 4 - ?1_,c .'I ~ ~!- 75t..q~ ~~.e/y~a~~'lrersu, G [l ni~,°I 11!h,~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ 4 a~/~~ ~. ~ lac ~ucQ~,~. C`. ~e~~i ~ 7l~ S~ l~.vc'~~ ~1 ~q /~ 7 /rye HNI/'~ ~ Oj(J ~ ~ ~r~ ". G, r 1, ~ it i" ~~~~ i J c i.. _. ~~ THE UNDERSIGNED O~OSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF~N EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE ~~ ~' ~~-e a 7~e/d1rnC "~ - ~ ~ _ ~,~~ ~c.. ,> ~. ~~ .~ O ~/,1~ ~ D 30,3> _" _ z~-~~ ~ -T • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL • RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. ?~Jt = ~~ • LG ~.~: ~cIG '~%~~~~ lam, ~,(/Gr~~,~~ J ~ i ~ i~ ~, NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE . -• • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL • RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. Zoc.C~/~ .~ ~~~~z~ Zd ~l~- ~jP. w ~-~-~-i/ ~. .6r1~2i i~i,~s C,~ ` u Imo ~ y '! ~ ~ / .~ Q ~f '~ i L~v~cQc ~~~~~; ~ t ~l 0 7 l~i~d~c~ ~~c~ q ~ 9' 0 7 ~a~. ~c~ R~ ,~o f ~Q. ~/ ,lf e ~.~ Bob /~r~e~tc3c~.szv ~l ~ ~l~C~ervy ~i/ ~~,~~ r _, ~~~ ~uCI~~~Vr ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~c~~~ ~ y ~; w . ,~c ~o~ - - 3l0.~ ~rc~.~ r ct~` ~/a8/~ /- z8~9 9~-~~~ ~ _18'_ 9~ gla~i9~- ~C~? ~. g ~~, . A ~~ , r~ ~~ • • THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL AND MUNICIPAL • RESPONSE TEAMS ADJACENT TO SHADY RIVER SUBDIVISION. NAME ADDRESS DATE SIGNATURE ~SI,PrUL 31io ,S,L~~~ 5~~~,~tis 9-a~-9~ 1~,.~.~.~.: /,~~ / S ~ r// I /~/ ) ! -~ j v ~..~~ t .ll ~ ~~d R15 O~.k Lei ~~e, q -2'~-q ~` >~y~ ~. ~~r~~o Ic~l~{ ~f~KgEl~~`~ q-Z1- ~~` =, EPH~4~t//t ~ LOGSLIO.~/ 3z /U ~/G VE.~ SP/1/~/GS' -/~'Z ~ ~i ~ `~1~- U~ ~~-- .~ ` ,~~J~ V -~~~~ -~28= tj • • • • SPENWICK PLACE, SECTION I REPEAT REQUEST • • • Staff Report October 20, 1994 Spenwick Place, Section I Replat Request Item No. IV on the agenda is to consider a replat of Lot 129; Block 9 of Spenwick Place, Section One. This subdivision was platted in March of 1953 and was part of the Collegeview Municipal Utility District at that time. The area was annexed by the City of La Porte in 1984. The owner has proposed the replat in order to subdivide one large lot into two. The existing lot contains 13,992.93 sq ft, which greatly exceeds the City of La Porte minimum lot size requirements for single family residential. The proposed lots will still exceed the City's size requirements and allow construction of two homes instead of one. • The City's Development Ordinance No. 1444 and State Law allows for a replat or resubdivision of a recorded subdivision plat, or a portion thereof, but • without vacation of the immediate previous plat and is hereby expressly authorized to be recorded and shall be deemed valid and controlling when: a. It has been signed and acknowledged by only the owners of the particular property which is being replatted or resubdivided. b. It does not attempt to alter, amend or remove any covenants and restrictions. c. There is compliance, when applicable, with Section 212.014 and 212.015 of V.T.C.A. local government codes. d. It has been approved by the Commission after being prepared and filed as though it were an original plat as specified in Section 4.04 of the Ordinance; and e. All expenses incurred by the City or the subdivider in the Replat process shall be borne by the subdivider, including costs of notice of public hearing. The Commission may within thirty (30) calendar days of the filing date, take one of the following actions. • • Planning and Zoning Commission Spenwick Place, Section I, Replat Staff Report of 10/20/94 1) Approve the Final Replat as filed; 2) Disapprove the Final Replat as filed, provided the reasons for such disapproval are stated in writing and a copy of the statements is signed by the Chairman of the Planning Commission. Commission action shall be noted on three (3) copies of the Final Replat, which shall be distributed to the developer, Department, and official files of the Commission. Final Plats: Effect of Approval 1) Approval of a Final Replat as filed and all accompanying documentation by the Commission, together with approval of the Public Improvement Construction Documents by the Director shall result in issuance of a Development Authorization by the Department which permits the developer to begin construction of subdivision improvements. Not • applicable in this case because it does not involve construction at this time. 2) Disapproval of a Final Replat requires filing of a new Final Plat. • Notifications and advertisement of the mandatory public hearing were complied with on October 9, 1994. • Staff has reviewed the replat; all changes and corrections have been completed (See Exhibit attached). • The replat will not alter, amend, or remove any subdivision covenants or deed restrictions. • If approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the chairman shall sign and release the replat for recordation. • This replat complies with applicable City of La Porte ordinance and State Law. Staff recommends approval of the replat as presented. • • • • SPECIAL CONDITIONAL IISE PERMIT REQUEST #SCU94-003 • CITY OF LA PORTE • APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -------------------------------------- o ©a Application No.: y~ - OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: 100.00 Date Received: O "30 _ 1 Receipt No.: 3 ~ Certified Plans Submitted: General Plan ( ) Major Development Site Plan Minor Development Site Plan ( ) Preliminary Plat Person Making Request----- J~v~~~ ~oa-rN~~ X02 ~o~^'"'' ~P°%"~------ Mailing Address: Inc S'hr+~zo~ Qaz. CitylState: ~ -row -) '7'~ ~7s~-I Phone: 7i3- bas- 1351 BUSINESS NAME : 1,A~.,.~ ,~ a rt,~ Z NTe~~sT ~ PROPERTY ADDRESS: ~ u1 CoR~erL ~'F~i~~e2 ~Q/r•.d~-y /9n't~ 3o~i~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION : ~~ ~ Q~~ ~' ~ o ~cliax~ ~~'. ~ 1 ~+~/~ v~~'~~-r ~ ~.2s- ~ ZONE: ~L SIC USE CATEGORY: ~s~5 TYPE OF BUSINESS: ~'I~°~~ se~~ ~"~~ A~•~ 930- 9y • Date ------------------ ------------------- Owner or Authorized A ent ----------------------------g---- OFFICE USE ONLY Date of P & Z Public Hearing: Date of City Council Heeting: Zone: This application is: Approved ( ) Permit I1 CLP JOB ~ (If Assigned Yet) Recommendation: Y Approved: Y or N Denied ( ) or N Conditions: • Date Zoning Administrator CED/1-'87 • • CITY OF La PORTE ATT: MARK S. LEWIS REF: MINI SELF STORAGE FACILITY S.W. CORNER OF MAIN ST. and BOYETT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Sept 28, 1994 • Please accept this as our authorization for M. David Boothe to represent us with the city of La Porte as our authorized agent to make applications, request or what ever matter may arise in connection with the permitting and construction of the above referenced facility. Johnny Steeland r- Jana teeland G~.1~ • • • r~ U • • L~NDMI~RIG INTEREST CxENERAL CONtRACtORB coNSr~uc~noN na~a~r arc cayw~ta~rs l06 SHARON DR ~AT70WIJ, tBXAB 'I'1521 City of La Porte Planing & Zoning Board City Council Ref: Mini Self Storage Facility Location: S. W. Corner Main & Boyett The proposed location, until recently, has been used by Matlack Truck Lines as a truck terminal which is not a conforming use under the guidelines of General Commercial Zoning. We have performed considerable research for the highest and best use of the land and it is our desire to enhance the general area since it is on one of the main entrances leading into the City. We have given great detail to leaving a liberal building setback and will be taking up about 1400 sq. ft. of pavement and base to achieve what we belive to be a well landscaped and attractive site. All the larger trees that now exist on this tract will be saved and additional landscaping is proposed over and above the City's required amount. We have taken into consideration the requirements for instruments landing approach now being considered for the airport. All of our proposed buildings are well below the maximum heights and the only two story building is 197' south of the center line of Main St. Provided at this location will be approximately 17,000 sq. ft. of climate controlled storage space. We have found there is no climate controlled storage available in the City at this time. Also we will be providing units with enough eve height to accommodate luxury motor homes completely enclosed, protected from the element and out of view. We will have an on site manager and an elaborate security system which should reduce the possibility of vandalism. Please note on the plans storage will be provided as arises for more space. that additional R/V and boat a second phase when the need Thank you for your consideration. M. David Boothe • • u Requested For: A 4.3668 acre tract out of Outlots 71 and 90; Richazd Peazsall Survey, A-25, which is further described as being located at 11230 West Main Street. (See Exhibit A) Requested By: Mr. David Boothe of Landmazk Interests, on behalf of Mr. Johnny Steeland, property owner. Zoning: General Commercial (G.C.) (See Exhibit "B") Purpose of Request: The permit is requested for the purpose of allowing development of a mini-wazehouse/boat and RV storage facility. Background: As noted, the applicant, Mr. Boothe, is proposing to develop a mini warehouse/boat and RV storage facility on the tract in question. The facility, as proposed, is to consist of 441 individual storage units of various sizes, an office, a manager's • apartment, and outdoor parking/storage azeas. This property is located in a General Commercial (G.C.) zone. Zoning Ordinance Section 6-400 designates both mini- warehousing and "outdoor storage" as a Conditional Use in G.C. zones. The requirement for a Special Conditional Use - (S.C.U.) Permit is based on the conditional designation in the Zoning Ordinance. Analysis: All S.C.U. Permit requests must conform to the requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 10-200. Additionally, when a permit is requested for property located in G.C. zones, the requirements of Ordinance Section 6-600 also apply. Staff has reviewed this request using these sections as a guide. Based on this review, we find this request to comply with applicable ordinance requirements. A summary follows: Section 10-201 establishes both the administrative review/approval procedures and basic submittal requirements for S.C.U. Permits. Regarding submittals, this section requires applicants to: • Submit a development site plan "drawn to scale and illustrating the arrangement of the project in • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 2 of 7 detail, including parking facilities, location of buildings, building uses to be permitted, means of ingress and egress, and other pertinent information..." Section 10-202 states that a S.C.U. Permit should be approved only if all the following requirements are satisfied: • That the specific use will be compatible with and not injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property, nor significantly diminish or impair property values within the immediate vicinity. • That the conditions placed on such use as specified in each district have been met by the applicant. • That the applicant has agreed to meet any • additional conditions imposed, based on specific site constraints, and necessary to protect the public interest and welfare of the community. It is under the second of these conditions noted above, (conditions within each district) that Section 6-600 becomes applicable. This section comprises the "Special Use Performance Standards" that are applied to developments within G.C. zones. The standards that apply to this request are those dealing with outdoor storage and required screening. Section 10-201 Criteria: Exhibit A is a reduced copy of the site plan submitted by the applicant. Staff has reviewed this site plan and found it to comply with applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements for setback, lot coverage, landscaping and parking. The site plan has also been reviewed by the Fire Marshal's office. The Fire Marshal has determined that existing fire hydrants will provide adequate protection for the facility and that the driveway/building arrangement will provide adequate • access and maneuvering space for emergency vehicles. • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 3 of 7 Staff has also reviewed the site plan for compatibility with the following Comprehensive Plan elements: Safety Plan: No impact. Thoroughfaze Plan: No impact; existing roads are adequate to support project. Utility Plan: Existing water is adequate for potable and fire protection needs. Sanitary sewer is not available and can not be readily extended. Existing buildings on site utilize septic systems. Applicant proposes to install either a new septic or package treatment system. Airport Plan: Complies subject to conditions noted in a following section of this report. It should be noted that Exhibit A is not a formal "Minor Development Site Plan" as defined by the City's Development Ordinance (# 1444). While the site plan submitted is adequate and satisfactory for this review, it will not serve in lieu of a formal Minor Development Plan. Staff would recommend that the following condition be attached to the S.C.U. Permit. This permit does not become valid until a formal Minor Development Site Plan has been submitted to the City; reviewed and approved in accordance with the requirements of Ordinance # 1444 and attached to the S.C.U. Permit. Section 10-202 Criteria: After reviewing this request, it is staffs opinion that the project is and will be compatible with surrounding properties. The east face of the site is separated from neighboring property by Boyett Street. To the west, the tract abuts a pipeline corridor. To the north, the property abuts West Main Street. This is the most public face of the tract. As illustrated on Exhibit A, this • is where the applicant intends to place a substantial portion (almost 6,000 sq ft) of the facility's landscaping. • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 4~of 7 Exhibit "C" (which is attached and follows this report) is an illustration of the type building the applicant plans to erect. The building style coupled with the proposed landscaping and setbacks should result in a facility that is attractive in its own right and is also compatible with surrounding properties. Conditions for G.C. District: As noted, it is, under the terms of this condition, that Section 6-600 becomes applicable. The performance standards of this section will apply to that portion of the site designated for "future open storage". The southeastern portion of the tract is comprised of a 25,650 sq ft area identified as being reserved for future open storage. There are presently buildings located in this area. They are indicated on Exhibit "A" by broken line outlines. The applicant has stated his intention to have these structures demolished at some point in the future. Following demolition, the area is to be surfaced, fenced, and used for boat and RV parking. At such time as this area is brought into use (either partially or in its entirety), the provisions of Section 6-600 will become applicable. These provisions are as follows: Outdoor Storage: Storage areas must be screened from the abutting Boyett Street right-of--way. The are must be surfaced in a manner adequate to control dust. All lighting must be hooded and directed away from public rights-of--way. Required Screening: Required screening shall consist of evergreen plantings. • Ultimate height of the landscape screen shall be at least six (6) feet. • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 5 of 7 • Minimum width of planting strip shall be four (4) feet. • A berm maybe used to obtain a maximum of two (2) feet of the required height. • Height of screen at time of planting shall be at least four (4) feet (inclusive of berm height). • Height at two (2) years from planting should be at least six (6) feet. • Density at two (2) years from planting should be adequate to provide an effective visual screen. With these requirements in mind, staff would recommend that the following requirements be attached as conditions of the • S.C.U. Permit. • Future development of outdoor storage areas, within this described tract shall be permitted under this S.C.U. Permit. Prior to development, plans detailing surfacing, lighting, fencing, and landscape screening in compliance with the provisions of Section 6-600 shall be submitted to the City. Normally required construction permits shall be obtained prior to development of outdoor storage areas. Additional Conditions: In reviewing this request, staff did find "specific site constraints" warranting special conditions being imposed. The first is the building height restriction necessary to maintain adequate airport runway approach clearance. The applicant has recognized the need to respect the approach clearance and has worked with staff to ensure a site design that • complies with these restrictions. Exhibit "A" includes the following note (above the footprint of the two story building): • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 6 of 7 "C/L [centerline] of Spencer 200'. Maximum allowable height 25 ft." This falls within acceptable height restrictions. Staff would, however, recommend including height restrictions as a condition to be attached to the S.C.U. Permit. All structures and plantings to be located on this tract shall conform to height limitations established for airport runway approaches. One other site condition exists that warrants attention. In the process of surveying this tract, the applicant has discovered that certain existing fencelines encroach on public rights-of--way. The applicant has stated his intention to remedy these encroachments. Staff would still, however, recommend attaching a specific permit condition addressing this issue. All property line encroachments shall be removed from this facility prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Conclusion: In reviewing this request, staff has found: As presented, the request satisfies all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. As presented, the request is compatible with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. If developed in conformance with the recommended conditions, the proposed facility will be compatible with the surrounding properties. It will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment or value of surrounding properties. Recommendation: Based on the facts and considerations presented, staff recommends granting Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU94- 003 subject to the following conditions: • A formal minor development site plan, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Development Ordinance 1444, shall be submitted • for review and approval by City staff prior to obtaining permits for construction of this facility. • • Planning 8t Zoning Commission Meeting of 10/20/94 SCU94-003 Page 7 of 7 • • Outdoor storage areas shall be developed in accordance with the requirements of Section 6- 600 of Ordinance 1501. Plans for development of these areas shall be submitted to the City and necessary permits obtained prior to development of these storage areas. All structures and plantings on the property shall conform to height limitations necessary to maintain adequate clear airport runway approach. All property line encroachments shall be removed from the site prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the project. This Special Conditional Use Permit does not waive, supersede, or modify any requirement of Zoning Ordinance 1501 except as specifically enumerated by this permit, nor does it waive, supersede, or modify the requirements of any other ordinance of the City of I.a Porte. This Special Conditional Use Permit does not waive or supersede the requirement to obtain any other permit or license normally required for a business facility of this type. • • • SELF- SERi1It~ A Division Of American Steel Buildings ~HIB1T C~ • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS • • • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS TRANSPORTATION -UTILITIES -OPEN SPACE Back rg_ ound: The Planning Commission, as required by law, has this year performed its review of the Comprehensive Plan. During this yeaz review, three major areas were examined during the workshops conducted in July, August, and September. The three elements examined were transportation, utilities, and open space/pedestrian space. In reviewing all three areas, a number of items were considered as prime indicators of growth and growth patterns. These items included growth rates based on housing stock, new subdivisions, traffic counts, and new projects of major impact. The background information is depicted as a part of Attachment "A". Recommendation: Transportation: In the review of the transportation section of the . Comprehensive Plan, it was quickly noted that many of the transportation improvements proposed in the original plan have been • addressed. Attachment "B" depicts the major improvements proposed in 1984 and shows their status. There is only one street project that is recommended to be deleted; the connection of Barbour's Cut Blvd. to North "P" Street at or near Sens Road. There is no apparent need to connect the Port traffic to "P" Street and there is certainly no justification for expense involved in making the overpass across the Southern Pacific Railyazds. Attachment "B" also provides the proposed transportation improvements that were developed during the workshop process. These include major street improvements as well as intersection improvements necessary to enhance the traffic flow on several arterials. Utilities: In the area of utilities, the Commission has reviewed the three areas of water, sewer, and storm sewer. As maybe recalled from discussions during the workshop session, the growth originally anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan has not occurred at the rate of 5.3% per year. Over the period of 1984-1990, the population was expected to grow by 9,203 persons. Actual growth by census count was only 3,670 persons. Estimated population by the Comprehensive Plan for 1994 was to be 40,572. By current estimates, the population is on 28,998. n ~J • • • The reduced growth rate has helped in the areas of water and wastewater. This slower growth rate has kept the demand down for increased services and has kept the proposed improvements still viable for the next ten years. The resultant effect was for the staff to recommend and the Commission to adopt no changes to the utilities portion of the Comprehensive Plan. Open Space/Pedestrian: In the review process, the focus was split between open space (parks) and pedestrian access. In the area of open space, the City has accomplished most if not more than was originally proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. As shown in Attachment "C", the original projects have been completed. During the workshop session, the staff recommended those new projects listed in Attachment "C". These will include a new community park at the old Seabreeze Sailing Club site, a regional park in West La. Porte and the redevelopment of a portion of Sylvan Beach Pazk. • In the areas of pedestrian walkways, very few projects have been accomplished. The staff recommended retention of the existing plan with the adoption of two new additions as a result of the Bayfront Master Plan. The new projects, as shown in Attachment "C", are the construction of a boardwalk from Sylvan Beach to the old Seabreeze Sailing Club and a pedestrian path or walk along San Jacinto from Main Street to Sylvan Beach. The staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the proposed Comprehensive Plan changes and forward them to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. • • • • ATTACHMENT "/~" • • • POPULATION INFORMATION Population on April 1, 1990 Housing Units on April 1, 1990 Persons/Housing Unit on April 1, 1990 Housing Units Constructed since April 1, 1990 Housing Units Demolished since April 1, 1990 Net Gain in Hosing Units Estimated Population Gain since April 1, 1990 (based on 2.8 persons/housing unit) • 27,923 9,971 2.8 389 5 384 1,075 POPULATION ESTIMATE AS OF DECEMBER 1, 1993 28,998 Average Growth per Year since April 1, 1990 1% per year • • POPULATION INFORMATION 1993 (1'HRU 11 MOS.1 Pop. 28.998 Housing Units Added 189 Housing Units Demolished 5 Net Gain 184 Population Gained at 2.8 persons/unit 515 Growth Rate 1.8% 1992 Pop. 28.483 Housing Units Added 173 Housing Units Demolished -0- Net Gain 173 Population Gained at 2.8 persons/unit 484 Growth Rate 1.7% 1991 Pop. 27.999 Housing Units Added 22 Housing Units Demolished -0- Net Gain 22 Population Gained at 2.8 persons/unit 62 Growth Rate .2% 1990 Pop. 27.937 Housing Units Added 5 Housing Units Demolished -0- Net Gained 5 Population Gained at 2.8 persons/unit 14 Growth Rate .06% r~ I~.J • O O • • z 0 c~ z O J d a C O Z H • O N O O~ O r O O O r ti O Z ~ O co Q o ~ r a ~~ a ~a o a' w w T ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ r ~ O~ a F.. r a y W ~ a ~ ~~ f r a N ~ ~ O ~ ~ O '0- r T ~ a r O ~ ~ ~ a m a O O ~ ~ et N O CO ~O ~ N O~ 0 1O, M M M N N N N N ~ a a~ ..• E m a _~ 7 d. o ~ t ~ ~ r ~ ~ C p~ O t m O °D E ~ K t ao .. 3 O ~ ~ r • C~ r v Gb CD ~ ~ a a y G 0 0 ~~ c~ ~ o~ ~~ m v ty •o x ~°~ • • • • • O a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ V N ^ UNDk7lW000 RD. Zw IA®_ _~'pAl~ l~ IaIIR 14 • 7 '~ ~ H V POWQL RD. K 10U1 $~. sx ~+a C ~ aaowwer x ~ ~ ~ m o ~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 O x ~ T c ~ ~ Q x Cl~ ~ ~ N • C7 • ATTACHMENT "B" • • • • THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS 1994 PRIORITIES Priority Group Roadway From To Project 1. Farrington Blvd. Crestway North "H" Construct 2 Lane Section Bay Area Blvd. Fairmont Spencer Construct 5 Lane Section Sens Rd. Spencer SH 225 Construct 5 Lane Section San Jacinto Main Sylvan Widen to 4 Lanes 2. Lomax School Rd. ~. 16th Street 16th Street 4. Farrington/Lomax School Road 16th Street Old La Porte Rd. Others: Broadway Canada Street Beach with Divided Median North "P" St. SH 225 Construct 2 Lane Section North "G" St. SH 146 Construct 2 Lane Section Fairmont Pkwy. W. Weems Construct 2 Lane Section Crestway SH 225 Widen to 4 Lane with Divided Median North "G" St. SH 146 (S) Widen to 4 Lanes Underwood SH 146 Construct 2 Lane Section Fairmont Shoreacres Widen to 5 Lane Boulevard Section Carlow Fairmont Construct 2 Lane Section • • • r1 U Priority Group 1. INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 1994 PRIORITIES Location Fairmont @ Driftwood Fairmont @ Famngton Fairmont @ Underwood Fairmont @ Brookwood Fairmont @ Luella 2. Fairmont @ S. 16th St. SH 146 @ Wharton Weems •3. Wharton Weems Blvd. Fairmont @ Canada Street Project Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes Install Traffic Signals When Warranted Install Traffic Signals When Warranted Construct Grade Separation Construct Right and Left Turn Lanes .] • . • 1984 PRIORITIES COMBINATION RESPONSIBILITIES Priority Group Project Current Status 1. SH 225/SH 146 Interchange Under design; construction in 1996. Alternate Truck Route to Proposed to be deleted. Barbours Cut Blvd. 2. Grade Separation on SH 146 Fairmont Pkwy, complete; Barbour's Cut at Barbour's Cut Blvd. and Boulevard under design. Fairmont Parkway 3. SH 225 Completion as Freeway to Intersection of SH 146 Under construction. • 4. Underwood Road from Proposed "S" Street to Fairmont Pkwy. Upgrade to Primary Arterial. Approximately 50% complete. Completion of Bay Area Blvd. from Fairmont Pkwy. to Spencer and Upgrade to Arterial Standard from Spencer to SH 225. Complete Underwood from Proposed Complete "S" Street to SH 225. Others: Upgrade Fairmont Pkwy. to Semi- controlled Access Highway. Link "L" Street to Barbour's Cut Blvd. Delete • Priority Group 2. 3. • • U 1984 PRIORITIES CITY RESPONSIBILITIES Pr_ oject Current Status Farrington Blvd; Crestway to Spencer; widen to 4 lanes. Farrington Blvd. from Crestway to North "H" Street; develop 4 lane section. R-O-W being purchased and design underway. Lomax School Road from North "H" Street to North "P" Street; widen to 4 lanes. Lomax School Road from North "P" Street to SH 225; develop 4 lane section. Old La Porte Rd. from Underwood to SH 146. 16th Street from North "G" Street to Old La Porte Rd.; widen and construct 4 lane section. Proposed to reroute to SH 146. 16th Street from Fairmont to Wharton Weems Blvd; widen and construct 4 lane section. • • • ATTACHMENT ~~ C ~~ • • • • ORIGINAL PROJECTS Little Cedar Bayou Park Includes: Pool with diving well 4,000 sq. ft. gym Playground 4 lighted baseball fields Concession stand/pressbox 1 soccer field ~6 tennis courts Parking 3 picnic sites Fishing pier Foot bridge Bay overlook Community Park (Northwest Area) Includes: 2 basketball courts 2 tennis courts 1 football/soccer field 2 softball fields Future Facilities To Include: 2 basketball courts 2 handball courts 4 tennis courts 2 baseball fields 1 swimming pool • Status Wave pool complex Recreation Center Complete 3 fields complete Complete 2 fields Complete Complete Complete Sylvan Beach Pier Sea Breeze Sailing Club purchased Complete Complete Complete Recreation Center Northwest Park • • • • NEW PROJECTS Develop Community Park to include: • Picnic Areas • Fishing Pier . Bay Overlook • Parking Develop Regiona_ 1 Park in West La Porte to include: • Four Softball Fields • Concession Stand/Pressbox . Walking Trail • Picnic Area • Parking Develop Re~¢ional Park North of Sylvan Beach to include: . Waterfront/Beach Area . Anipitheater • Festival Park Site . Picnic Area • Parking Pedestrian Walkways to be completed would include: • Boardwalk from Sylvan Beach to Sea Breeze Site . Walkway along San Jacinto St. from Main St. to Sylvan Beach. .~ ~ " • ......: _ • :..w . +~~nrz.• -, .~:%'r.r '~ ,':• saw^a 'ml f 7 ~i~ y~j ~ ` _ f •..M r' i ! _ ~~ ~~ ~' i ' 1 ~ ~ -, 1 ~ I Fj /p ~ / % P _y$ I. ~^/ f• '~ ~ X iAYddil~~ p I C ~ ff ~ ~ !.:~ ..t ~ .Z i~ 1~ w A ' !N e p r qp j .. c° t -c ~h z~ . ;!`F~'i.' ~ ~~ p y ,~q~ r r j r'r ~ ~ ' ~ I r ... r ~~ ' k ` µ r ~ r• ~j X (~ !s4 Tv `\ \ ~ •v 7 tY ~'A a !R ~°' 1. 0.%!• . ~ ~ ' Z r ~ r ~ r P # r ~ ~ ii m i ; •~ :~ ,:~ a _ z ~.:..:.~......... i . .... - - ~` ~ ~ ~ y. ~ a ..._~. 7 ~ ........ ' [ . .... . ~ .. .. \ r,~~i ~ ~ ~ c~~ ;,, ~1~ i `mot.. \\~\ :~ i h ~ .. <~ .. • .d •. I -: '' .: . rry~ \ r, ~ r A k . ,~„ ... F I • ~ ' ..,..~ • ! . . e r ~ ! ~ ~ ~ \ O 4 \ ~ , i i ~/ v _ `i .. 11 ~ ~ ~. . ._ .... •. ~ ~u ~ - ...... - ~ •~ G CI ~.,, ...,~ p } r «w1 7 I S ~ ~ ' ...~.. I_.,... _ .............p ............_. .... ... ...~ ~.._. ... _...... ... .. ... ..... ._.......... .._.... ... ...w. .... ..._..... .... .... ..._ _... ..... .. _. ............._ 1 , O ~r~r i ........._...... .._.......,_. l....__... ~ ~ ..... __.._..._ ....._......, w{ ......_ ~ .. .. ~ , • -~ _.._; .._ j m ~ ~ _...._._.._. .._..._., .__._._.. _ ._...... • ~ ~ f !~ ... ....._ _. , ^ _ ...i. i N ._~.. •....~~• _...~.... ~.. ~ i ,~. ... .• ......I . Yr .i __.... r t• ._..:.. .... ... .. ~ A .V .~ • .~V i r j ~ ... ...r......... _..1.... ..~ ...............wr.._ y......,._.._. ~ ~ r ' r ~~ ~ ~~ ~ t-- -.;.... P ~ x^s. . ? ... { r ~ ~ 1 ' M'~ ~~.... .I w, ' y ~ 1 ~ ~ • y w.._ . K ~ _ ....... _.... w. . .~ ^~• e W ij , f ~ ! ~ .. ~ wr ~ .~ p i N r ....._.._........~.._. ~ I i ~ .a • r :j_. , . i ... ............. ......_. Tp • , .... .. . ..... .. I r { w 1 i • '. { ..... .. ... ...~..' nl'.y ~M~ } ~'~"i r~ ~ .....,M.~.. 'N i 4t Y W ~ i.. ,M ~ a ~I ry j ... k ~ .... ~ r • + v ~ {_~....._......._.l..... ~ ~ ...."'.r^' y. wA .y , tin j ~ ' ~w ~ ~ h { ~ „ ~ i... ~ Y , ~ _ ~, I j ~ , p _....,,,.,,, _............._ ~w _. V ......,~. ~ ~. ..~.... ... ~ ~ ...._ f I Y ~ M NL Y y ~~° ~ ~~ I ~, ~ ~ ....,... ... ..... ~ 0 .< ~ r H l Cr M I - T_.. `` ' i M1 r x j .j1!ti ~ rt. 41 T X fr` 1 i buy. gg iPPP .~~ fl ~ ~ '1 l_.... _ s'ry3Tw, Yjl SAiiY i~. , ... ~. .•.~._. .... ... ......~~ .•••.. lC'C%1MlYRR .A. . .............. ..1.. ...._.. ' i :: ~ j'I \ ~ e :.... ............... ......._....._........i I ' r 9~ ' .w T ~ ~ ~ { V .n \ V I+ .ti .., . , ^ .~ a W f~ _,.. _ ......_...... ~...._............ -~ ~ - -- - -• - -~-- -y• ~ -<~- v _ C ~' r rn ~ ~ v o -~ _._......_..; rn _ ~ ' ~ r ~~.« v ~ v _ , c o ~ = cn rn cn ~ ~ 1 ~ , ~... { _ . z ~ .-i z ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~• '° l6YM 1iY. ~ D ~ j ~ ~ .. r , __ .z .. ~_ • ~ ~~ ~ t ~ ' ~ ' .,.._„ r ' ~ .. ~. 0 ~'~ I ~_ `^,~ ~- . ~ - - - -I ! 1 ~ /^~ ~ 1 I l k I i ~.. i..~.~ \ ~ ~... i r~ 1 .. _- --.. _._. -- ~ yy1l w• -- - - i - ~..~ ~ _ ., ~, r j + '••~ 1 ~~ -•- = _•-- -= IIIHIIIFFIi11H1 ~ 1 ~n s ~ } ~ ~~ j - -----•-°'~ nnmmmnuwmluumumwilulnumui~muununnuuu ~,-, ~ ~ , ~ fT.~. c •. It-'~ ! _ ~ 1 -. ~~ \ ,- i+\ I ' ~' ~ ____ -.---- ~.,- _ ~- 6 rr~..r.rrr.....rr.rr.r; ~~~ ' Ii Z ~~'}' ~ ~ 1 ......r...r.r ....................... ~ I ~'(.n„nr u~l + ' 1 - --- -~•- - `~ - - j \ 1-z _ i J~` ~ , ;~ ~+ ~ J' j 1 ~ u ~ ~ ~ Z ~ , I~ I. o ~ ~ ~ ., ~~ z + 1 Y1_... ~- L- 1 L! I ~~ ~ _. i~ I • - .` - - - ~ !1 ! ~` ! . ~~ ~ _ r _......,~,r:~. j~~~ =....._.- .r ~~_~ 1 rr •,~J~,•` •~ b l E H ~ ~ ~ ~~ r H HH !~~__( ~/ ~ H C ': i 1 ~ i ' ~ i -, 2 .~. 0 1 x 0 y n D r m a 2 0 m m c 'i o 0 m x .{. .~ O _ - T,~ r m °x m O T ~ z s n s ~ V ~ ~ _ g ~ ~ A A m n > m O ((~77 7 ^~1 S F ~ ~ m f.~ s ~ ~ ~ i ~ m f s ~~ r' ~ ~ ~~ I w~ ~~-~ .1 . + ' ~~ _ ~ ~~~~ ~l ~a 1- ..-~~.:; ~ • '". - - - -- - 1161' ` .....n.o...~ nnu.n.n.un..rrT.i i ^^•r~~ ~r~Wr ..1u~ ~- i a ~ I / ~ ~~ ,- l ,,, 4 3 ~'•. 11~: i~~ ..- ~-~" ~ f i ~ ~ ~ cr` ;f ~ ~-- ------ ~ 1 ~'~ ~` / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wiiumn. ~ ~ ~ (~ ~~ ` ~ . ~. ~ ,-,~ 'Y % r~ '~ _.._ ..,. ,.i.~ !~ ~ ,~ ~ 1 + ' r ~ . •I { r,I ~ rll V 1 r', -- - J /~^^' 1111% `~` ~ ~ .. r% ~ ~,~ji ~. J i ,) ,',' ~,~.~ ~l i ~~"""([[```~y~~tyy` j ~ 1 C J! ~ I``~s--t ~ , l ` ~m vim' . S' i / ~•~ ~~. ~ ,• f J , ~ '~ ( i `~ ~ .. ~ ~f li ! r •r~ ~ .~ -J/I 1 S 1 1 .~' C r ! E i i /' ! ~ p i i /j •'~' i ~ ~ 6 1 1 // i ~ r i 1 (, o ~ ~~i ; r 1 1 { %li ~ ~ ,', ,~ ,~ ~ . ~, ~ - ,1 ~ ,'~ / m ~~ ~_ . .~ ~. t ~ : ~ ~~ -~ ('' + :'%/ O i ..... ,:~ .--~ .\ ~~:~ y I -------- j i •. ~ i ., . I C~ ~' ., ~ ~` 1 ,.•' I ~ i .~... •. j 1 '` ^ ~:1 ~ I _ ~ ..~. I ' + i { ' € ~ ~~_ _;~ I ~~~: -, -- - --- ~ --- ~ i •~ . ' -- -- -- i --~ 1 ' j _ ~_ _ . I J { , ,• I / o i __~ --- I o ' I 1 1 I ~ I I Z ' '~ ~ - ~~, -~ ~~= ~' 1 e`t ~, r ~- '~ t 1 ,,\ ` •l . ~- 1 ~~ , `~ ` ' ~ I ;~ 1i ~ - r .; _ _ _' _ ___ ~.J 1_ _ ... ... _ ~ _ rn ter;' - - - r4 ; -~- '~'- --; / 1 j' .I 1 _ r ~ h'I I° z I I~ J I' O I ',` ~ ~ ~~ _ 1 ' T I , ~ ~~ ',~ I z ,. ~. I it / '• I FI 1 I I ... _ ~ j.. ~~~,.: I I I ' r~ C I ~ 0 I i b 1~ H Lei l~J i ~ ~ ~ ~ ,'Ty F-i '~' i H tr1 U] H H H ~' ~ H ~ 's' ro I r~ r _., z ~ - y-- - z--- -~: _ '/'. f7 a O i ' O 1 G 1 I d 1 8 m ~ x_ ~ m i u~uunu~~n~nuwuu u.uuum v m O 'Y S ~ { e 2 ~ ,~~`•Y`. {r: m :, .:.<. O ti a n 2 m D nt O ; ~ 9 N 1" Q ~. m N 7 ~ ~ a z o' y r ti a 'j 9 { _ > 9 y O O x m o x ~ "~ ~ a D s ~ m y t N _ / ~ i a. ~a nn -_-.1. _ .. ___. ._~~ _~~.-.~ .1•.. ~~ -_ -•-~~ 'mot. ~. 1 .\`' `~~~ f. I ~`a~. ; . a~,• ,: ~~,~~ I .. ~` _ ----=-=- _.. _ _ C <:::~: f _~ ; j , ~ ~~'~. .... e ; ' , ..ww~° 771 ~ .:k • .\' ' D I ~n z `~ -<vo ~ -o m mmz ~m~ V/ D ran n-m Z Z t e - tl-' _ I I I C'~ = ~ ~ , ~~'; - l; '• ~ T 1 1 ~-~. -- - - ti 1 - ~l • •e~ ' 4,, ~ ~_- r _ 11 i ~.. ~ ~. I~ j'J ``\'. ' 1 - it f j ' 'I } + .i 'rt) ~I ~ T ( o ~~ ` _ - - ~~ r+- ~ o _ ~ =c } L0~[P. SAII lA[IN;0 8!I 1 + 1711` ~ i ~.~ ~ J .~rZ J~ b y 11 ' % 1 1 ~• ~1 ~ / ~ / % `~\ ~i 1 t ~ ~ .~ 1 1i~ j 1 i~ ` j i ~ i. ~-, '~' : ; ~ ~~ a ~~'~" ~ ti~ 1 Jr% ,~ / / ~ ~J - .' m ~'' ~ N I ~ T /~' ~ i- ~ .~,~ :` ~~ `I '. / r ~G{M:I:T.ArT J"1:'~i':i~.:L'.:11•'.`fiY•;JV rI iC ANDRICKS ROAD I I '•L' p1t01 i !II '111 ~: '11 1 I 1 1 I ..I ~ 1 1• 1.~ 1 ;tl ~ Ir ~ tl. ~~ 1 ~~it~ .t .< ;: i; . 41~ . jJ r i ~~ `~ (a> (1 O t ~~ m . `•` ~'~ -T~ .I •I i I I It • ,. t. + ` +. I 1 ,. 1• , ji , N ~ a ° N ~ .~ .~_'^ n ° u 3 ~ µ 9 e ~ - v w :~ 1. v I •~ ~ m p co N~ m ~,~ ~° ~A n M Z 3 A n a 3i ~C Qa `o nn C °: Iaj C w ~c: i c'^ ~ ONI r N < ~ .+ 7. n na ~ A ~ ' ~ j y A Iw n w Iyi V~ p •i < Y E p~ C ••~i j I tl !' Z V~ 6 a! m n Z •1 9 M ' G ' A 1^ y < ~ ° = a (: S v , O~ n ~- a 2^ , p ° V= l y i M v 6< n O w w m n O no.. ~ro z ~ a O ^vs~ C O 'n O N N < °C m ~ ; O y°,am p- u r 0 oe^1 9~S•c y m °3%r n e3au:t7 o N n °: ^1O ^ O fl ~ ry av_ m :o u2gpni ww u5 T ." ~ :: - O e',v, ~ K o `= i a0 'R. ' a,w rc E C ~,~'° a wo1O 9aa'E wEoo Y a . J ° ri (M ±o ryas O S~ ~ , V r In o ] r ~ '~ ^ ~ 4 . ° 1'i v ~ A ~ ' ^ •u ~ , = ~ ~ o ~ ] a w w ° w n r C n a ~ 3 ^ ' ° ° a ° » n w o - ~ ' G ? O ~ N 1° a"J •° S ~ q w f. n N 1 11 ° a n P ~ 6 v n ^:^ O 6 c O a' a O fi 7 y S A r 'n n ~+ 3 K CCCC yl ~?7~ z ;+ n A .7 ° t^ w a o Q v c:S~ v r oa - ~~ n. oa3°.°o'(~'v .e ' ~ .` i O (1 ~ ' ..{ in O ) .J I ' c r ~ Gt a~ ~~re ° Y 7 ~ ~Y ~ ,7 w _ °'O `C ° 3 _n a° na.n O N • °p j p o 3 ' ~O ^wV t• a ~^,awrn° . ~~^ wg y~ g o a °.e Y Y'° v v1 v'e ° u 3~ e r ' w w •e s fro' ° £ S a ° w C °^ - ~°aO< 4 ~ °~ °q 9 ° ^ ~; ° ov t il ~ O• ~ • 5 ` w ~n ~ ~E n n° ~_ p s °~ 3 '" ^ a ~ n ~ 2 p K e a o i w ~ p> >» ~• ]~° 5 r _ °.° p r ~ v' w ^ to n w , a n q°»» e 2ApA n v•~pn c w > °°i:v~~~n3 .°.°r O a n w •'•a on ~ S n °no~ ~ M a S o'~o .. v v_' '~.• v v; ~ n °e^ co • °<` ~ y~n ^O , v O a ~`' A t N „ ° nrwa »c a ° w w e . e C:a° : ~n ~ , 'V4 O N ° r ~ ''I p 1 n s n n ° ` O .s ~ n 3 o O ° ~ ~ '~ Ip a a w° v oom rc ~. p i p .. a ° ° ~ ao np~n w tl p n ,• c ~ +J . o /S n r ~ .R M j v N . .. ,'C,to~n .~ ` ~ CJ' ` O ~ ~ O r~ °^ .[ O ~ ° • ? , i ~ :. a n : o cra ~ 3 1^ ~ n 3° o` ~ 3 .^, a v ~>> n r m o o n ~ o ]~ y'o ° q n 3 ~~ ~ .. c; ° m ~ , S n c i' ~ .° c ~. I ~ ~~ o om e^ r c ~ ~ i w^+ a - n om `; a c y' .nr _ .i 3 `: :l - i n n°a ° J ° >: ,q al '^ .°ra'3 ^ ' ^ w'~~sY a°w a°»a ~y ^ ' ° nano » ° ac'wns~?,ja '2 " c t+ v I~ a ~ ~° y y a m . . o g y ,• . to p ;% urn ] rr ~ ~! n~ v o n n o 3 , L r w i» O p u s n o ws V p1i : • v~ i: °^ M o v n 7 ° a _ " ` a'" - n ° o ] o r n ° o ] a ~' - •~ ° nvaid c n o 't s a v 3-o ov ^p ° ~ .;i ~,o , t v c 1 °~$ w~ws. ,^~ c ° n 3 ' rr3 o°' ' ^. In Ii M ^ o r c O ~ S° S ne ' a ww s° ~ _ n3°s _~ o •iR~tf N r o $ . Ct ' ° s _i i ° n w~~ a ^°•; n` 3 Ows ..» s - ~e3w nwv n a°vvv awn •..~ !' .i ^ •e wc npo o ° n o v vSN~.Ei n : ^tis~5.~: E»N ^~n(a rr E nM» ° .°. y o3~P I H :°nn ? Poon'a' w•a.. .i-`own ne$ ~ , co'.°nr~wd~ rn A rn zl m O ~ ~•~, ; o . . ea7'~vc)m~7rncn '• ~1 ~ a IW 1- -{ N~~~~Ov ffl (7 - ~7 -~ n per.. 1 - v '~ /1 ~ - ti O N O v •nw O~ r~ ~ ~O,rVJ,rJ'TN~ rr 99 EdJ `"p ~Onr7iOnO v ; ` :'2ND-'(nj ffl N W r""" ~•`i tN ~ U~•~-I~ OlU ri ~ p+nv _ ~~ °T -1 In N 77•'Z7,nUCp • Arn Y~ `M ~ c) .. O D (A :i . O 1 0 0 0~~ r ~~ m -~ A~crnfn~ c ;tTt77-t-~AO%'~7 (n.~ .~ 177 (n 'r7 G) fil ''`~ ~ '~ .. .. ..:~-...-..-. .., - : . -I.t: ~° e u b n ° u~ ~ n ^ aao -~ _. _ - ° ; ~ ~ -~. _~ ~p .yam ._ _ -O- _.- - _ _ _- . M A .M ^ ~ i V o~~`j o3a3e~m 9~ ~ ~ M p R 0~ or ?Sit c sps°-'==m a a N - ~ a ' n pn O^ n • '^ w 3e ~ I .. ^ _ ~t, r ~ I s ~ ~ ~ 3 °, I ~ o ( ^' r -T p is ~ a (t d C u a ^ G r 3 a n' , N w 3 v w n 7 ~~I ~~ ! I ~ n ^ p ~v r ~ : C a _ ° n » C a p a~~~-~ T 1 I ' o K M 3 tin ,°'o w ~ ~E add 1"N . J 1 I I -1 I " I ,p N Lw~n^ a-' ~ K ~1 r Op3 ~C'°'' ° a=- G 1 •-:1'11'1 L••1.1.1"ht ~ n '~3n°, v'. n.. i. r.'r ^ I v~A t ,••. ,.,•.. .... , srr,:•-:•+-r.•ok:-ne1.,r:a.la..nlwr+vria,.s :r.rr*•.:..aw:a:r^I w:..a. <.:--.r.,+=,,.','... ~ ~ •~r, ss . .emv t:l : ,,.: ~.'~ { r.~F ~,~r or= nor Izq I~~.ocl« ~: ~'.~~'•~ f ` 'i ~9 rl 7~~}~I~}W~C}L I'~~.n~t. ~J~:~ II[)}~} 'P•• •i' SPENWICIC PL1.1Cr REPIt11T ,.e..r- :...y-,,,,.:. CI•IARLES E. BATES & ASSOCIATES I.ANp SURVEYORS • CITY PIJINNING (:O(J.^.!.11 IAN 1'S ~72f• LUF.I.IA AVE77UE f.IfGli PARK 71: itA5 77!:)fi (7JJIAT9.51J5 (fA%)479•]7,75 a I \,, '•. y, .• '•` '•: ~ ! • :,rV'` ,~ :,,;•.~: ;:.j ;:N a A n ~ ') k ~ D ~ W ~ (7 Z W C ~ ~ rl a O A 70 V7 ~ -1 D d r'' r a ~ ~ A S v r*t ;~ o ti o ~ y - 1 a t' a r ~ p z - i v ~ T A C] ~ r l ~ f' I D S A 7 ~ ~O N O N V D v . ~ ~ Z . .. NOd13'20.3'V 581.73 , I a • P ~(wJ1 W VV -~- _~__-.~__~__ 3-_ fq~-klnQ ffOCf • ~ .... .......... .. ---- -------- 1~ `~ r --~ - ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 'proposed riri F'Onci I 1 ~ I , . ,, . I 1 ; i ~ q ; I i 1 l~ ~ IM ~~ x 1 I C IA ~~ ~~ I 1 1 r ~ ; ~ 1 ~_ 1 - I 1 1 1 ~, 1 1 _ _ _ _I - ~ 1 LANDSCAPE 200 S0. 1'i. I -_--__--__-- --__~- _-.._-~___-_ J__ ' ix Imuurr trsvorr 1 - -' - ~ - - [~ .6C'IOC 3~0'6-.C2POS -- -•- - "'- - -' BOYETT ST. ' eo• knv yy p ? N ~1~{~J{k ~' (~ y~ v~ r~ Ff- f7 y ~ ~~rinn~~~~A ~ ` X a g5~ J. ~ btl~+A ry + Tk . ~~ ~~~N~ s ~~~y~ ~ ,~ ~ a;e~ ^ N . \J ~f' ~1D• H I H o O ' = W '~ .. I ti ,:...; W ~ ~ :a 4 1 I D 1 (~ I I WO I 1 ~ ~ I I ~.00 I I 1 1 n ESAO ~ I I ~ Z I ~ j I ~ I I ~ k. 0:~ , , a 1 1 :I I .I 1~~ .• 1 ~, --~ T' I_ ~I I , I ~, I ~ 1I--~ ~~1rr~111I _ m ~I ~ 1 '-,- ~ 1 I 1 1 s ~ ~ I 1 ' I . ~ ~ 1 9 kq 1 „' >t qP I 10.00 ~ -/ 1 .-_H-_ 1 I -0 SOI Fl I 1 - - - -&rT7~Ai' n 1 ~1 `I 1 • ~1 .. I ' 1 1 ~' ~ i ' , I~ ..., I ~ ~~ .. ~ ' ..~ . ~~ ~ -- ~--- -"---' '- - 1 ~ ~ -~ - --- .... - -- ' . I. 1 i I I 1 I ~~ • • 1 i ,% i ~, t I i • ! i II L~NDMARIC INTEREST ~ ~ • PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN • -' MINI SELF STORAGE FACILITY pg y,i~y~7E3 708 SHAitON DR. BAYTOlYIV, TCXAS 77521 1130 SPENCER HIGHIYAY •• SCALE: 1"=40' PHONE 713 865-1351 i • j j .i J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W N i W N i O a a a p P~~~ D~ n~ p ~ ~,. I ~~~ ~ n ~;~. • ~ooa a 3 N ~ ~ 'd 3~~, a m o m ~ ., mm~ ~ m . ~ ~ .~ o W m O a H m d ,,r ,~~ ~~~ ~ o ~r _~ Q W oo co 00 0o w o0 00 00 00 0o ao y W i ~ i I I I I I I I ~ .« n n n n n n n n n n n n n m 3 0 N C. ID ID a ~c N n O 3 3 N O eo m a e °,~ m Q m 0 Q ~, -o 0 O ~ o Q3 Q-~ ~~~ N=d ~ A 3 J ~, Q. ~' ~ ~ to O 3 3 N N_ O City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing October 20, 1994 Any person wishing to speaks .n FAVOR of any item being consideredby this Commission, please indicate below by: `_;~_ A. Printed (dame B. Signature C. Item In Favor Of • 1. A. /~~-~ ~ ~ ~o~~ ,5~,~ 9 ~ v~3 B. C. 2. A. ~~~,lD ~ s ~ f~l~ `/ B. C. 4. A. B. C. 5. A. B. C. 6. A. B. C. 7. A. B. C. 8. A. B. C. 9. A. B. C. 10. A. B. C. 11. A. B. C. 12. A. B. C. 13. A. B. C.