HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-11-1996 Special Called Public Hearing and Regular Meeting of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission•
0 Minutes
0
• MINUTES •
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
• APRIL 11, 1996
•
Members Present: Chairman Betty Waters, Commission Members Chuck Engelken,
Eugene Edmonds, Margaret Anderson, Howard Ebow, Dottie
Kaminski
Members 'Absent: Melton Wolters
City Staff Present: Director of Planning Guy Rankin, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee,
Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong
L' CALL TO ORDER
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Waters at 6:00 PM.
It. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 21, 1996, REGULAR MEETING.
A motion was made by Maggie Anderson to approve the minutes. The motion was
seconded by Chuck Engelken. All were in favor and the motion passed.
M. OPEN PUBLIC HEARINGS.
Chairman Waters opened the Public Hearings at 6:01 PM.
A. REZONING REQUEST R96-002, WHICH SEEKS TO REZONE
TRACT 12.A, A 4.049 ACRE TRACT OUT OF THE W.B.
ROOT/W.M. JONES SURVEY FROM MANUFACTURED
HOUSING (MH) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC). THE
TRACT IN QUESTION IS SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 8902
SPENCER HIGHWAY.
Guy Rankin presented staff s report for R96-002. He informed the
Commission that the tract being requested for rezoning to General
Commercial (GC) originally held a GC zoning prior to its present zoning
of Manufactured Housing (MH). Staff recommended the rezoning be
granted based on several factors. The factors were:
• The rezoning would create and maintain a GC corridor in
accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
• • Based on criteria established by the Comprehensive Plan,
the area is suitable for either the present MH or the
requested GC.
Page 2 of 5 • •
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes of April 11, 1996
• • The zone change would not have a significant impact on
traffic conditions in the area, nor would utilities be
significantly affected.
Eugene Edmonds asked for the definition of Manufactured Housing. John
Armstrong provided a definition.
Howard Ebow asked Mr. Rankin to clarify a sentence in the Conclusion
section of staff's report.
1. PROPONENTS
Larry Womack, of Pecan Plantation Mobile Home Park
(owned by the Heritage Group), addressed the
Commission. Mr. Womack informed the Commission that
he believed the original owners of the park planned to
utilize the tract in question to expand the park for
manufactured housing. The Heritage Group now intends
to use the area to sell new and used manufactured housing.
2. OPPONENTS
• There were none.
Staff mailed meeting notices to five adjacent property owners. No replies
were returned either in favor or in opposition to the request.
B. SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SCU96-002, WHICH HAS
BEEN REQUESTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING
CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFF -SITE PARKING LOT TO BE
LOCATED ON LOTS 11-22; BLOCK 687; TOWN OF LA PORTE
SURVEY TRACT. THE TRACT IN QUESTION IS SPECIFICALLY
LOCATED IN THE 200 BLOCK OF NORTH 15TH STREET.
Mr Rankin began by saying there were ten meeting notices mailed to
adjacent property owners. Staff received one reply in favor and one reply
opposed to the request. One notice was returned undeliverable.
Mr. Rankin reported that the applicant was seeking a Special Conditional
Use Permit for the purpose of constructing an off -site parking lot. Mr.
Rankin noted that the applicant plans to expand his business and there is
no available room at the business location for additional parking.
• Staff recommended approval of the request with the condition that the
applicant be required to receive City Council approval for closing the
alley of Block 687. In addition, a landscape plan that exceeds the City's
minimum requirements is to be submitted by the applicant.
Page 3 of 5 • •
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes of April 11, 1996
• 1. PROPONENTS
Lindsay Pfeiffer, owner of Pfeiffer & Son, Inc., informed
the Commission that he planned to construct a building to
house his equipment where his employee parking currently
exists. He intends to improve the Polk Street right-of-way
which will give him access to the site of the proposed off -
site parking lot.
2. OPPONENTS
There were none.
C. A REPLATTING OF LOTS 3740; BLOCK 72; BAYFRONT
ADDITION, WHICH HAS BEEN REQUESTED' FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING PLATTED SETBACK LINES AND
EGRESS EASEMENTS.
Mr. Rankin informed the Commission that this item had been withdrawn
from consideration. Mr. Armstrong asked the Commission to declare, for
• the record, that the application had been withdrawn without prejudice to
the applicant's right to come before the Commission at a later date.
A motion was made by Chuck Engelken to deny the replatting of Lots 37-
40; Block 72; Bayfront Addition, without prejudice to the applicant's right
to appear before the Commission at a later date. The motion was
seconded by Howard Ebow. All were in favor and the motion passed.
1. PROPONENTS
2. OPPONENTS
IV . CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING.
Chairman Waters closed the Public Hearings at 6:25 PM.
V. RECONVENE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A REPLATTING OF LOTS 5-28
AND THE ADJACENT ALLEY OF BLOCK 133; TOWN OF LA PORTE SURVEY
TRACT, WHICH HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF
RECONFIGURING LOT AND ALLEY BOUNDARY LINES. THE TRACT IN
• QUESTION IS SPECIFICALLY LOCATED IN THE 700 BLOCK OF SOUTH
BROADWAY. THIS HEARING WAS ORIGINALLY CONVENED ON
FEBRUARY 15, 1996, AND SUSPENDED. A MOTION AND VOTE BY THE
COMMISSION IS NEEDED TO REOPEN THE HEARING.
0 i
• Page 4 of 5
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes of April 11, 1996
A motion was made by Dottie Kaminski to reconvene the Public Hearing regarding the
replatting of Lots 5-28 and the adjacent alley of Block 133; Town of La Porte Survey
Tract. The motion was seconded by Maggie Anderson. All were in favor and the
motion passed.
Mr. Rankin informed the Commission that this item had been withdrawn from
consideration.
A motion was made by Howard Ebow to deny the replatting of Lots 5-28 and the
adjacent alley of Block 133; Town of La Porte Survey Tract, without prejudice to the
applicant's right to appear before the Commission at a later date. The motion was
seconded by Chuck Engelken. All were in favor and the motion passed.
VI. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Waters closed the Public Hearing at 6:28 PM.
• VII. CONSIDER REZONING REQUEST R96-002.
A motion was made by Eugene Edmonds to approve Rezoning Request #R96-002 to
rezone Tract 12.A, a 4.049 acre tract out of the W.B. Root/W.M. Jones Survey from
Manufactured Housing to General Commercial. The motion was seconded by Chuck
Engelken. All were in favor and the motion passed.
VIII. CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERNUT REQUEST SCU96-002.
A motion was made by Maggie Anderson to approve Special Conditional Use Permit
#SCU96-002 for the purpose of allowing construction of an off -site parking lot on Lots
11-22; Block 687; Town of La Porte Survey Tract, subject to the applicant receiving
approval from City Council for the closing of the alley in Block 687. The motion was
seconded by Howard Ebow. All were in favor and the motion passed.
IX. CONSIDER REPLATTING LOTS 37-40; BLOCK 72; BAYFRONT ADDITION.
Previously acted on.
• X. CONSIDER REPLATTING LOTS 5-28 AND ADJACENT ALLEY OF BLOCK 133;
TOWN OF LA PORTE SURVEY TRACT.
Previously acted on.
• Page S of S
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes of April 11, 1996
XI. STAFF REPORTS
Mr. Rankin apologized to the Commission for the late delivery of packets. Staff will
make every effort to have them out in a more timely manner.
Mr. Armstrong updated the Commission as to the status of the Bay M.U.D.
manufactured housing lawsuit.
XII. ADJOURN
Chairman Waters declared the meeting duly adjourned at 6:30 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
• i- :Z-K4117 " , A
PeL le- If 1* g-
gg
Planning Department Secretary
Approved on this the 16th day of May, 1996.
Betty T aters
Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman
0
•
•
Zone Change Request #R96-003
u
0
.7
• CITY OF LA PORTE
APPLICATION FOR
ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
------------- 03
--
Application No.: 9�-
OFFICE USE ONLY: Fee: $100.00 Date Received:
Receipt No.:
( ) Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site Plan gL D mpt
( );Major Development Site Plan ( ) General Plan
(),,Site Plans Submitted on Ot_v_e�oenti J, )]
APPLICANT'S NAME: Dp�/A
Address:
Date:
OWNER'S NAME:
:7 f
PH:
Address: 54-1-V PH'
y, AO opt Lo 7'a.4 -t z5' Tn1-V 3z Q% /V
Property Legal Description: See Atta e(
/ ,¢ f'2v /e1';e, 7'aX� 5
I AM THE OWNER OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND
IS AUTHORIZED TO FILE THIS APPLICATION ON MY BEHALF.
Date: Signature:
Zone: R-i
Proposed Usage:
Requested Zone Change: C.
---------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
OFFICE USE ONLY
1) Planning & Zoning:
Recommendation:
(a) Preliminary Meeting -
(b) Public Hearing/Mtg. - o
Applicant Notified of Date(s): ( ) 1st Mtg. ( ) 2nd Mtg.
Adjoining Property Owners Notified:
2) City Council:
Approved ( )
Denied ( )
(a) Regular Meeting -
(b) Public Hearing/Mtg. -
Adopted by Amendment Ord. #1501 -
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
ZONE CHANGE REQUEST
PAGE 2
r�
Applicant Notified of Date(s): ( ) 1st Mtg.
Adjoining Property Owners Notified:
This Application is:.
Comments:
Approved ( )
Permit No.
( ) 2nd Mtg.
Denied ( )
CED/02-89
•
0
•
C
Staff Report Zone Change Request #R96-003 May 16,19%
Requested for: Lots 17-32; Block 64; Town of La Porte, which is further described as
being located at 201 N. 3rd Street, La Porte, Texas.
Requested by: David and Bryan Moore
Requested Zone Change: From Low Density Residential (R-1) to General Commercial (GC)
Background: The property in question currently has four (4) warehouses with concrete
drives/parking within a fenced area. The present structures are located on
Lots 17-23 and the southern five foot (5') of Lot 24, and are considered a
pre-existing, non -conforming use in an R-1 zone. The undeveloped portions
of this property are the northern twenty feet (20') of Lots 24 and 25-32, and
are owned by the same individuals.
In acting upon a zone change request, the Planning and Zoning Commission
and in turn, City Council, are charged to consider the following factors:
• Was the current zoning designation reasonable?
• Was any error made in the assignment of the current zoning?
• Is the requested designation compatible with the intern and
goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan?
It is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate whether any of these criteria
have been satisfied.
Purpose: The applicant seeks to expand a pre-existing, non -conforming use by building five
(5) new Mini -warehouses on the northern twenty feet (20) of Lot 24 and Lots 25-
32. This action would require a zone change to General Commercial (GC). Mini -
warehouses (SIC #4225) are a "conditional" use in a GC zone.
• 0
• Analysis: This request would result in one-half of a block being rezoned to GC, while blocks
east, west, and north are zoned R-1 and R-2. The Proposed change would increase the number and
size of the current warehouses by 50%, thus the zone change will impact traffic conditions in the
residential area.
Comprehensive Plan:
Section 1.7 Residential Development Plan of the Comprehensive Plan states that one of the
principal goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to enhance La Porte's attraction as a residential
community; moreover it states the need to plan La Porte's future residential development. The
housing development tendency today is increasingly moving towards the development of smaller
lots, smaller units, and higher densities. This tendency affects La Porte since the City enforces a
zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance specifically defines what areas may or may not be
developed, the type of development that should occur, and in the case of residential development, at
what densities housing should be developed.
Section 1,10 The City of La Porte, like other cities, has areas that are in a deteriorated condition or
in the process of deterioration. While in the ca
negative effect on both surrounding areas and se of La Porte these areas are limited, they have a
on the City's overall image. It is the goal of the
Comprehensive Plan to have these areas upgraded in quality. In order to achieve this goat, two
options are available to the City of La Porte and its residents — the first is to recognize the need for
redeveloping these areas, designating them as such and establishing specific capital programs and
investment incentives designed to improve the area's condition; the second is to reshape
in ons
and surrounding these areas through the concerted effort of improvements proposed b ltr the
Master Plan for the City as a whole in order to create favorable conditions for their uading
y
through the traditional development process. P
Zoning Ordinance Section 1-200 states: "The zoning regulations and district as herein established
have been made in accordance with a Comprehensive Plan for the
safety, morals, and the general welfare of the City of La Porte. " Section on 1--30rpose of 0 staff ting health
Policy of the City ... that enforcement, amendment and administration of this ordinance be
accomplished with due consideration of the recommendations contained in the Comprehensive Plan"
In light of the above statements, there are three factors that can provide grounds for granting a
rezoning request. They are as follows:
• The request conforms with the intent and recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
• The recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, regarding the area in question were
made in error.
• Circumstances regarding the area in question, have (since the date of Plan adoption)
• changed sufficiently to warrant amending the Comprehensive Plan.
• In order to justify a rezoning of property, it is at least one
above criteria has been satisfied. It should be noted to burdenary to oof proonsW
ate f, terms of .us of the
the rezoning, is placed on the applicant. J �ying
The Comprehensive Plan, as it applies to this request, recommends a land use of "Low Dens'
Residential Land Use". This recommendation is borne out in the R-1 zoning ed to the area. nmg that has been assigned
The zoning and land use designations are intended to both conserve and promote neighborhoods of
single family homes on individual lots. A Warehouse does not conform to the recommendations
and regulations established for this area by the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance The
Northsidethelimited AreaRlZone is finonite in size 'and an expanding non -conforming use would clearly subtract from
the Citys Northside.
The recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan regarding this area have not been made in error.
of detailed n Exhibit "C", the recommendations of the Plan were made with consideration iv
not only to the character and history of the North Side, but also that of the s g
developments. Residential Uses on the Northside should be encouraged
One of the intents of the Comprehensive Plan is to effectively protect different areas areas in by the
that benefits the City as a whole. The R-1 zoning, in conjunction with the Low Density Residential
land use designation is not only appropriate for the area in question, it also serves to conserve and
• enhance Property values in the neighborhood.
The City of La Porte has received two -hundred and fifty -thousand dollars for the p of
program to
developing thirstity new houses on the City's Northside. The development of a comprehensive
mulate and revitalize the Northside and Main Street Area should begin within six
months. The overall intention of the program is to stabilize the neighborhood, while incre
both residential and commercial development. asing the
There has been, since the time of Plan implementation, no change to the tract in question or the
surrounding area that warrants either a rezoning or an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The
applicant has not justified this location, in an existing residential neighborhood, as opposed to a less
intrusive location in an otherwise undeveloped area. In fact, rather than changes that would warrant
a rezoning, development that will be stimulated over the next 12 months by a grant from the Harris
County Housing and Community Development Agency would build a minimum
in the Rl section of the Northside. of 30 new homes
This action would affirm the intent and recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff is currently working on a process of Infll development. Infill
development promotes housing affordability by using existing infrastructure than requiring expensive extensions of roads, and services rather
water/ sewer Lines, and other facilities into newt
developed areas. Infill development also avoids the consumption of open space in outlyin areas
and puts housing closer to job centers. Regulatory techniques that promote g
1
administrative streamlining, density bonuses, and the elimination of o erzoning or industrial
uses.
•
• Any successful strategy to promote viable low and moderate income neighborhoods must take
into consideration neighborhood character and history. The most successful strategies for
promoting in -fill development have involved related and integrated controls within older
residential communities.
Conclwon: This request does not conform to the intent or
recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan
• The Comprehensive Plan did not err in its recommendations
regarding land use and zoning designations for the area in
question.
• There have been no changes within the area in question that
warrant an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan.
A change to a GC zone would be contrary to the goals and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
Unless the applicants are able to demonstrate that the requested GC zone is appropriate, the
Commission should not grant the zone change request. The Zone change would be in contrast to
• the Comprehensive Plan and contrary to the redevelopment of the City's Northside.
Based on the above listed considerations, staff recommends denial of Zoning Request #R96-003.
• 0
•
•
•
EAST ADAMS ST.
V
4-1J
w
Q
�
�
o
�-
�
z
�
z
EAST POLK ST.
BLOCK
64,
TOWN of
LA
PORTE
1
125'
�
N
2
-
.3
^
�1
^
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
^
10
-
11
^
IZ
-
1.3
^
1�
^
15
=
16
125'
�
`�
in
N
125'
�2
.�1
-
29
28
27
26
-
25
2�
2,�
22
21
20
19
1B
'n
`1'
125'
17
•
•
0
EAST TYLER ST.
EAST POLK ST.
BLOCK 64: AREA SCHEMATIC
kc. iY .y_•"�hj �`�. T,•-, ay iya T,. - .e, ,+�.ti. 4 {'a^ , k ILx'
wf 4h� t �� (� P• w rr� .
{:✓i "*fi�,��� qL�`�` t�i' z; 'r . �; r S .�:$t�.?#�# 1 a# : r �� �'� � �_;. � r �1tt . � t.�i'va � s� .tit
Inc
J +f "`� Y. cS.,.,. _ � 4� � qv! � ' i J2` -a �. e' a�R "S r ,t t ,_ ! � L # 't f.J��•
.�. Y .fn'Y�-'ys�d`_-- xqq,,,,'- -+r TsF``4i"L{ f. �,,..�•s` �viry 1[A^ •.ds�.;�4
° >•'�+ - Ly ti �8 i . la'S?gpry7} >gar4`! f v r4.
4 a' r �+ f4. p w�A't/tYy i`G 5�41 e�l•+l' Pti r t y,�,{ niGa [ v va e F c x
�5
i - .. T _ ,C', � �:. .• �� �y�� _ yam.
•�;'�� ,, = a� � .,fir' .ry °M;� � t^�" � rr i-,�;,'
a ..o.,
w; K• r f�.; ,.'.
Far
Vs-
♦ ,r�. �� ,.. 5�� � 4�T ,.. �� ++ca� ?� �4sf z' r ' f •? g •�• 'j ` s ..�, �r t,>'E. sy. rY _
-, ay A .y -�, ' "a ` f (� Y '{,e t � �_. .._rs, x 1.. '+' t • -
�s h '4 t .7.rt sk-♦ � y, i ,F.
i
J�
♦�-yZ ? }� r :.\ c 7�Y k �-S".r �'*- � j n g.'r 7 �. �f ��s7 iF :,tY'0^�k?rlY -i� � '� ^C � .
'T l 1 �'� � K ��-ii°' � ,�„"r'T,r•+v^^.+-. � r�r^' � $` �? °q � ,i ,_r�.�v1 Y �x a+ _e--Y_
L -f`
-
�6e�er�eel!a[v°r6F `,,:�N� ' aea„ay rt -..,r a�"2a �Tn•.s z,¢yvfi � �n I�.4...��.1.3" e. � :� ,� � '`'� 't. _.:. : s� + a`at'_
_ Y!?a"`ra'du'f+` Y L i`�^•. y .tyi .+'- 3 - fir. \= 7 -
r j �y. _ .. a7i 'A4'ii`[iNt•FXiAF':t ,.ft•.ti u;,A'�n},*?.r g-,. f,�r1•T^ i ` :+?,Y •a; -
-
�'-- tt ,,,a.+ van � ♦ ��+
�?i�� y+,f`nir4?S♦.3,fx'it"y �'�i.' .+' S.'♦� +.:;.
r ... lt,�a ak,£�T*4y?te•?sH. h� ' r '_ •
4ci t ,I�rriy .MS t +, i�-ys.•a� .�_..^%�.. n `<.ya 9 Y "i.? �� �' :. e
�ZE f ` ;ie ` ; Pt iLY �`�i, r r d � � .f ^x .mot• .�.,C„ -t-c-
t-vt�...1 s r..�T t~'tT + �c yt?'`�-{ ��' . � .� •i r1' , j ,e�.0 �•� .
3 � ,;7 •�,yrr. �i � C fv i�-.
�.5 F. �F � � �t.. r rif,.,i4: Y,y+rY,�. �S ��i r a � Y! � � r� i `,� p •` p >�:,•.:::
ti �Z�;,di '` '•�, x.tafr ..1 .x , c9 t � ; �r'3 j .r-,. f o� � , ¢ y
per
!IO � 9AII
C J
Kroger - Fairmont Parkway Center Subdivision
0 Final Plat
CITY OF& PORTE
PLAT/MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL
APPLICATION
•
(All plat submittals to be reviewed and considered
for presentation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission must be accompanied by this
application and necessary documentation listed
herein. Submittals will not be reviewed by staff
without this application.)
OFFICE USE ONLY
DATE RECEIVED: 4/30/96
SUBMITTAL #:
RECEIPT X:
PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
DATE: 5/16/96
Type of Submittal: General Plan (_) Preliminary Plat L_) Final Plat (X )
Major Development Site Plan (_)
Date: 4/30/96 Contact Person(s): James A. Cummins, Jr. Phone: 522-6088
Name of Proposed Development: Kroger - Fairmont Parkway Center Subdivision
Name of Developer: Fairporte Limited and the Kroger Company Phone:
Address of Developer: 2001 Kirby Drive, Ste. 502 Houston, TX 77019
Number of Sections: 1 Number of Lots: 5
�egal Description of Property: A commercial_ 10.904 acres, a resubdivision of all of Blocks 899
& 900, parts of Blocks 865 & 169, and the streets and alley enclosed therein Volume 58 Page
460, HCDR, Johnson Hunter Survey A-35.
Filing Fee:
Amount: 50.00 Receipt #:
Checks should be made payable to the City of La Porte.
List All Other Contact Persons:
Name Address Phone Fax
•
Submittal Type
General Plan
Major Subdivision
Preliminary Plats'
Preliminary Plats'
Final Plats
Minor Subdivision
Final Plats'
41 anal Plats'
Major Development
Site Plans
Note': Residential
Note': Other
0
SUBMITTAL FEES
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 1444
Base Fee Base Covers Additional Acre
$25.00 1st 10 acres $2.50
Fee per Lot
N/A
$50.00
1 st 50 lots
N/A
$1.00
$50.00
1st 10 acres
$5.00
N/A
$50.00
Entire subdivision
N/A
N/A
$50.00
1 st 50 lots
N/A
$1.00
$50.00
1st 10 acres
$5.00
N/A
$50.00 1st 10 acres
$5.00
N/A
0 0
CITY OF LA PORTE
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CHECKLIST
FINAL PLATS (APPENDIX D)
Development Name:
Type of Development:
Location:
Date of Commission Review:
0
•
Kroger - Fairmont Parkway Center
Major Subdivision - Commercial Retail
1300 Fairmont Parkway
5-16-96
CITY OF LA PORTE
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE CHECKLIST
FINAL PLATS (APPENDIX D)
•
FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN ALL ELEMENTS OF THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY
PLAT PLUS THE FOLLOWING:
GRAPHIC CONTENTS:
SHOWN
�L
NL
hm
I., ~' Name h of , owner-(f < a company or
( X)-
corporation, list name and title of
authorized representative).
2. Name of registered engineer or surveyor
( X)
( )
( )
who prepared Final Plat.
3. Legal boundary description of subdivision,
( X)
( )
( )
consisting of a metes and bounds
description of each line between each
boundary point This description may be in
written or tabular form.
4. Legal and special statements. ' where
( )
( )
( )
appropriate:
a. Owners' Acknowledgement
( X)
( )
( )
(Enclosure 1)
.
b. Lienholders' Subordination
( )
( )
( X)
Agreement (Enclosure 2)
C. Plat Accuracy Certificate
( )
( )
( X)
(See Appendix F)
d. Final Survey Certificate
( X.
( )
( )
(See Appendix F)
e. Approving Authority Certificate
( X)
( )
( )
(Enclosure 3)
f. Amending Plat Certificate
( )
( )
( X )
(Enclosure 4)
g. Vacation of Subdivision Plat
( )
( )
( X
(Enclosure 5)
h. Harris County Clerk Filing
( X)
( )
( )
Statement (Enclosure 6)
I. Return Map Agreement
(X)
( )
( )
(Enclosure 7)
j. Special Statements
( )
( )
( X)
•
(Enclosure 8)
•
F__�
Development Ordinance Checkliso
Final Plats (Appendix D)
DOCUMENTATION:
1. Proposed Streets: Submit complete public
street construction drawings for approval
by the Director of Community
Development. (See PICM for criteria for
street construction documents.)
2. Proposed Uti('fies: Submit complete public
utility construction drawings for approval by
the Director (See PICM for criteria for utility
construction documents.)
3. Coordinate listing: A complete fist of
coordinates for each point to be marked in
the final field survey. Each point on the list
is to be assigned a unique number code.
A copy of the Final Plat, marked with the
locations of each number code, is to be
submitted as well.
4. Utility Company Letters: Letters from
servicing utility companies approving the
easements shown on the plat for their use.
5. Private Easements: A copy of the
instrument(s) establishing private
easement(s) within the subdivision.
6. Private Easement Holders Consent: A
letter, -statement or instrument from the
holder of any privately owned easement or
fee strip within the subdivision boundaries
approving any crossings of said existing
easement or fee strip by proposed streets,
utilities, or easements shown on the plat.
If adjustment of existing utilities is required,
said letter shall specify the nature of the
adjustments and the approval of the owner
for such adjustment.
•
SHOWN
Y N N/A
(X)
()0
()0
( X)
( X)
( X)
Development Ordinance Chec*
Final Plats (Appendix D)
•
7. Residential Parkland: Receipt for
payment in lieu of required dedication
of parkland, pursuant to Section 12.05
of the Ordinance or instrument of
dedication pursuant to Section 12.10
of the Ordinance.
8. Conditional Asoroval Document: Any
documents specified by the City
Planning Commission in conditionally
approving the Preliminary Plat.
Comments:
•
• Signature:
•
SHOWN
Y N
N/A
( X)
( X)
• Staff Report Kroger -Fairmont Parkway Center May 16,1996
Final Plat
Background
The proposed Kroger - Fairmont Parkway Center is to occupy an 10.904 acre tract of property
located at 1300 Fairmont Parkway. As designed, the center will have frontage on both Fairmont
Parkway and State Highway 146.
The Center will be comprised of five (5) lots intended for sale to individual owners. This is the
reason for designating the project as a subdivision rather than a major development.
Under the terms of the Development Ordinance 1444, the center is considered to be a major
subdivision. This is based on the size of the development (in excess of 10 acres). The
Development Ordinance requires a two stage approval process for major subdivisions. The first
stage is preliminary plat review and approval. This will be followed by submittal of a separate final
plat, along with construction drawings, convenants and other applicable documents.
The Planning and Zoning Commission, at its November 2, 1995, meeting, conditionally approved
the subdivision's Preliminary Plat. The conditions of approval were as follows:
• • Notarized letters from the record property owners authorizing the applicants to present the
preliminary plat on their behalf.
• Closure of Streets and Alley's located within the plat boundaries.
• Inclusion of public sidewalks on the Fairmont Parkway and Highway 146 faces of the property.
• Utilities to be located underground as opposed to overhead.
All Plat conditions have been satisfied and all applicable fees have been paid.
Analysis
Staff, using Development Ordinance 1444, Section 4.04 and Appendix D as a guide, has reviewed
the Kroger -Fairmont Parkway Final Plat and found it to be in substantial compliance with
applicable ordinance requirements.
A Final Plat shall not be recorded until executed by the Director and by the Commission. Before
the Final Plat is executed, the developer shall follow the procedure provided for in the
Development Ordinance, Section 4.04, and construct the proposed improvements according to the
approved plans and specifications. In the event the construction does not begin within one year the
• applicant must re -submit the application to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
• Comprehensive Plan :
Criteria for the review and approval of subdivision plats are established by Section 4.03 of the
Development Ordinance. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat using these criteria as a guide and finds
the document to be in substantial compliance with ordinance requirements. Staff has also reviewed
the plat for conformance with zoning regulations and the goals and intent of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. A summary of this review follows.
Land Use and ZoningPlan: As indicated by the zoning designation, the proposed subdivision is
compatible with the underlying "Commercial Use" designation assigned to this general area.
Thoroughfare Plan: State Highway 146 and Fairmont Parkway are both major thoroughfares.
Highway 146 is a "Controlled Access Highway." The Texas Department of Transportation is
currently reviewing the location of the proposed driveway entrance on the State Highway 146 face
of the property. Fairmont Parkway is a "Semi -controlled Access Highway." Driveway locations
on this face of the property will be primarily regulated by the City through zoning and development
ordinance regulation. Harris County will also exercise jurisdiction over location of esplanade cuts.
Stormwater Plan: The Fairmont Parkway storm water system was designed to accommodate the
property on which this subdivision is to be developed. There is no need for on site detention. The
applicant received approval from Harris County.
Utility Plan: There is adequate potable water and sanitary sewer capacity existing in the area to
serve the subdivision. Some abandonment of existing utilities will be necessary to accommodate
construction of buildings within the subdivision. The easements proposed are adequate for service
to all lots within the subdivision.
Development Ordinance Issues:
Plat document: Staff has reviewed the plat document and found that as prepared, it satisfies
Development Ordinance criteria for graphic contents.
Utility schematics: Staff has reviewed the construction plans and found them to be in accordance
with the development ordinance. As proposed the subdivision utility plan is satisfactory.
Title Certificate: The title letter submitted by the applicants satisfactorily documents property
ownership. It verifies that no delinquent City or County taxes are due on the properties included in
the tract.
Pedestrian System Plan: At this time, the "Pedestrian System" component of the Comprehensive
Plan does not call for the installation of public sidewalks in any of the rights -of -way abutting the
perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The Commission required public walks in accordance with
(Section 5.02, Development Ordinance 1444).
0
Recommendation: Staff, based on its review, finds the Kroger -Fairmont Parkway Center Final
Plat to be in substantial compliance with all applicable City regulations. Staff recommends Final
Plat Approval, with a motion to withhold recordation until all construction is complete.
Action by the Approving AUthon
Development Ordinance 1444, Section 4.04.B states that following review of the Final Plat, the
Commission shall take one of the following actions:
Approve the Final Plat as filed.
DiSaDprove the Final Plat as filed.
Awroyal of a Final Plat as filed and all accompanying documentation by the
Commission, together with approval of Public Improvement Construction
Documents by the Director shall result in issuance of a Development Authorization
by the Department which permits the developer to begin construction of subdivision
improvements.
DD sapproval of a Final Plat requires filing of a new Final Plat.
,7
0
r
STATE OF 1EXAS
COd1TY OF 1NAN5
Ma FAIRPME IAMM T..a 6sild gd -kP ai IK
• glOfiTl C0. d f71is ..groin ....n a..irdtw ..brick o a
Owwa d w IOBOd onto bid drrtd o w a.rw lool•oy rA
d [solar-fr.rd Poil # Crlr M hw.W .rlr rd vref�� a/
odLwen d [oi6 P oPwy oomowl to d bo. hial�a tabidiss
W rrotalerr a d W n.oga r pM sack Iw.y Briar b a w d
w pAlia tarovr. d .bids (rack Orr drdo +�P od s PA•r.
icrocu), .Wra o•d color mv.w dr.wa .e.rov oa ro p•bGo Hoer
rro• brio 1. w pup..s W rri/w.lior Orr.e good
rd d. h dr bid .4.d (aaodv.e) or (w .u) Ira ocean
od rims to .. Md ad is a od.N w Gti to w bd
a dwcansd.
F111111 M orwn F. ddedd cod q N.00 prow do dofcd.
to w was d w Palk for 0,4k slip pavocce ir.vr a
w.OoWda .aid srrwoa :rr (3) 1st ride b.w . Pt•r
f1 (3) kd .w. n" ason vla .10.aw."iw 1oI w
d o ro.4 aro.y pin rerinw dw.a daylr. or odw
d.ral dr ' oral wdd n ..d Oct. as.w oa.o.l. 1r
`a. , poPww li •' w Of of to PaAa Ilya Cw019
or cry OAK gwworroad .9soc% w tight b odr .Pan dl
...oaod d oy Oct a Gar Ir w p.Pao .1 o..doofio
.id a.drao.a of r••n•M faiii.s and dad. a
NMO06 orwo do'.soar ea rr . wd woo Vat a d w poPwy
sibin a. bsudria d Ono Plc wd wittow to • N tictisoM
o.aoL dam orsoop ndye ad aarooft dry d ors
boo. ph"" .d caw co"olroo in w ww-w ad
snodrwso d w ardrq. I•eMF ad OM -rck dry y p"wb
nr..rril w W..d o1-ge d Wo o wa.oPi by
FURNt71. O.ar, 9.d1• Qd Vie r.pid dos od curd to dr.
rood or - or a.v.nwd or '%Aridona
Xd.dhd@ndFy w lar.q.iq frprto tndd rd Too Kato Co. and Iwo
w n9M to row dra..d�r sa.o.rr .r per r..p I" Pr•WIY n .
o.wr rat, Ma w r4w aw..t a.od.d.
nwti C ordn woo olio old a *id low KmAltam OF
1ECPAOCAL EASFNEMS. R6OOCOOM AND AOIQIr M a rAd
Iw remc war rww Co••I Orb. FL Ma MAX fabwy 19.1!!6.
t fAaO'OBIE GMI[D
Jwr A Canis, Jr.
J=4 ►. ollnrla IN. 1
71E WWI, CO.
tqrPs1 X.ro-.•.-Pswd
•
•
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY Or wim
8d.r. oa w .4w rid anlw.r r Ua ay posr+M ePs.a.!d
Jose A Carina Y. awn 1. w. to w p.•.a•..ror
.n.silr..d t. w I.r.q.iy in..u...d .d ain..ryd A rr bw
W a.uAd w sari lay w arrrdraboo red wprs brie dalsi
0- wr nM rw tow Sood,.4 ,ar a.
wnis ••r d-pL aft, I"s.. I
immA..-M" -
16a4ory•. Sioaebra bF Camn.en Ears
STAR OF OWO
CDLWN Of ONO
Bdr. we, b.. ud..prw1 oAb.* a W. dor P.- '0 arpwd
Pad Xs1h.M Via -prop. d it. Aragw Co. a Ole co vodon.
Non to rr.. a the p.nr . w mans a e.brned to lift
Iriot" b., r A sr -..dgd to w. bolt no .oraAd
w -a law pse.d"d ad pupas M-o ddd
Oro w4or wr hwA as Sod of office.
of /Ld.' of /L 1996.
A,, 7-V-
UL rd�c A` nrary'e Sgmoso br Cannrwa ford
NancY White
trowy. F-tar ft-
FINAL PLAT
OF
KROGER-FAIRMONT
PARKWAY CENTER
SUBDIVISION
SURVEYOR
H. CARLOS SMITH
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
P.O. BOX 529 - 423 NORTH HIGHWAY 146
LA PORTE, TX 77571
(713) 471-4226
SCALE: 1" =100'
to x . ra so
SCJ%tE IN FEE(
WEST '1r SiMEET
FAIRYONT PARKWAY VAX y
KROGER-FAIRMONT PARKWAY CENTER
A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF
10.904 ACRES
A RESUBDIVISION OF
ALL OF BLOCKS 899 & 900
PARTS OF BLOCKS 865 do 169. AND
THE STREETS AND ALLEY ENCLOSED THEREIN
VOL. 58, PG. 460. ET SEO. H.C.O.R.
JOHNSON HUNTER SURVEY, A-35
LA PORTE. HARRIS COUNTY. TEXAS
5 LOTS
OWNER
FAIRPORTE LIMITED AND THE KROGER CO.
2001 KIRBY DR. SUITE 502
HOUSTON. TEXAS 77019
JCCH INVESTMENTS, INC.
GENERAL PARTNER
JAMES A. CUMMINS. JR.
PRESIDENT
A•by . 10S0t so. (17a,9B0 oluoe �) bed a1 WA ad boy a d Soda M1 ad
M0 w • b too lock d 6fod al;
. Prow d Sat Is% r/ Mo M.A eti fro
rode.." .Alois Ilnw soda. an. bao•.w b w B.P d !. Pala as ..snack
M Vsbow 3L d p`9a KA d so a go HMOC-y ood Ai.tod. In Or Joosao Ndw
Surver. A -A Le Pon& Nrro Caddy. T-W w odd 1001111101 of Sri 1614 w.l 61 1"
o e-+wl d Son so d ..soar•• to NadyAagd M%it how... by orbs...
rdr Iienio Cagy Owlh Pia OWNS Na AM1439 No PWIN at Sod ASS r all-WN
b O••rM M. Sltsa Sr. q itsbt..nord r.m.a. I. Wow, 2Md, d PW 715. Node Co••7
Oaod 11oew.c w Moat wA-hw d Sock 900 a cow."d b cow" N. gw% Sr. b/
brbwb" remd . in WAwt WL at Polls 4K ft. Co. O.d Assails, Sod% M1
co a word to 51.brrs nAAd for CAPP W Whoc q oar-st lowed is I1woi
Cw%y air. rya Cob No. 11572M Ito d.lr ewair. sock Ift baba boa
.sadaA .Asada" wd .oad q w O4 d 1A he1S bf 4woa N► 770, Odod
be�a.: ll, aaww d�.r�da.d a �oyu Pay Oi» Nei WON )w"
d" .Id1RM 2L IM1t will IBM am bad Wine awn I•Af daariod a IMwc
OOGMMAL od . W ba add "1r w Pod of bdaraaBa of w Eat
Apt-.1- cy it d tIM SMd VA Not Nra Apt-d-" it of fdnad
►boy (W•d V Sbw*
➢wma Nwft aoiddsd .f w fad '#A A of it of 14k Sb.d . &W-
d 010.00 lad b a S/= but Fad it Ir w P" a6areae 1 of w I" rw-
d- ey. it d 14& small .M as mom �y{-d-.y it of wad'r Sbwl.
said ay Pad bdr w Swrdrort iron .r II.rA Mt
Tiooa. East. a.i-Ad-d .Ai w Mrlb Apt-d-..� it ei ad'r atok
.al w Solo liaa d sock AM a i w" 4, t1i00 Nd to . 5/jr Ina
1.d d er w Soatod saran.. M Block Ull, Mo' aM w .gait d
b..ra.eO.n d w N.rdo tight-d-.y 6r d Nor r acol dao w Mod
AMd-d-soy Ins d 130. Sbwt
Tlrta ko ft o , i , sm mo Ed it d Ad Iles and It. Md ew-
at-" iw d 131. Stoet a false of ISM Id to 0 3/0' Vas nd d
or .Far,
lbnea Ea6 we . w •hM-d-a.f d 1346 3111106 a dlnlro d 11100
fool t. a 3/r b.a red ad for e-sor to w EM Apt -slay it d 130.
Sbol. boy on w Mod s o 41 Blom M3:
Too, Nw 1. eaostdod Ira Do &d AAM-d-•or 6a or 1311. Stood
w w and id of Block AIM a .Solana of INA0 lad b a 3/` boo rod
" w w NrOo..d soar d LA 7. Nod Mt7l
lltnw Ea.6 mi%rddond t.Is ew ft,* Ar of tab 7 wd 21. a Addy. d
211011110 Na to a 3/11' Into red od for w Nartlroot "rwr d tat Z6. Sock
Aft and wool o w M.A 4M -wf it of 120. SbaC
71ro. So^ o.rvidad o6b w Mod Ape-d-w/ AN of 120. Stro.t .rd
Do Eod ti d Boat AA3, o dotoe of MM Id to a 3/11' 116 and ad
for w Sadlo.rt or.r .1 Oak AM oaM Out Wool w P" It idaresron
of w M.a nqM-el- ey it d IM Sinai .& go N.AY A9 d- cy fe of
. 11.4 'r SbwoC .
ilrao. East. o:nc.at .0 w rwa right-l-.ar it of wool'r soar..
ono w Solo Am d Block leta " of 32M 1" to 3/[ is
na al Ir an SWAMA e.row of Bock 16A. Will Pint bdy ate ON Pow
d •Awwdr d w "a Aqa-d-.y it d Moo' 'f SYM .Ala w E"
Apt-d-.ay -.w S1ao 1110h.ar Na 146 (IIVL S1064
Trw,m Sall. Conchal .Nb w fad rips-al-wf {s d SWo N4r•af N► IN
jtltw. Sboa) or w old be d also 1114. a cide o d ZOO lod o d
X` aA o roads Iota for w bard." aaw of a DAM aa. bed a
m.w�ad b t:rA Oil Can. by ir.ro.rrwd ratordel WOW Xon� Cary dr Oa
M. Coha Na r 014175;
Th.v. Wad. to' *' I .kh w Nodh 6d d .d C.Y C1 C.P. OAM sons
but. o dTdsae of 173.00 1" to a We. nraorrd'arid tar w Nadrod
eomr d told *ADS we Vogt
Ilona 5: esordrlwd sill w Md it d aid C d Oi Car►. DAM ar.
bid.. Adana of 200110 led o s boa ntrwrrA kind for w Shod
arrr of aw amn aea beet wd pad bop e w Nwa nqd-d-.y
line of faie.d Pam, (Mat': SO"k ,
7l.da W_L aotd' .M U. �M riot-d- W i. d Fond" May.
ad w Saab dos d Bock. I::. AID od M. a ardance d MOD 1" o
w POWT OF BEGNISM
l N. Cola Sft nliI I udr w I.- of w SOW of Too to Pteda w pd..i-
d lad a op.1, a nw.y coriq mot Ili, pig ocnamep nars.o4 w nrdb of a
NO'" pr w wd u.ar it soma..•.k wd dot d bard-► ase"am wpl. p " .d
poa of arve htwc bow or d be no..a -0 fe./.Vow oe na ref " to brio
of
I
wy (30) bra%.e n to90 vol bd wo P•A mrMir sa w rugniordM. as 4•iF••d
•o # �A�
by w City of V Pot.c, OwooPrrwd Ordinonnca��
N. CAatl)'S 3trtN
7 %Co.%
;0
K Cana Erie
Toro PAgirwd A.%-" S.-M Na 12n
sobs
'
Y-e MLES
71fr e o wMr Oat l X. Car. Still. nAlr.rid qo t of w Oar d tad biry
.rrdaidd -wan so Rregr-farcoo P�wtwf Cam. r. Apia. by w la ion. OM Poa'ry
A Zrriq Con.ti.aea aWari. Baw+r A Ku: r k Cosy Oro of Nano C..y or Ir
adlwid Oeaut► o .rack w aryirnd d .ei �-L otd to rdra w arigb , nmda as
d said adwar
ar to w a-W so w CAW' , d Is Pw. Plrnn4 D"wu-4 or to K
womo, td ropr..."t- 10 wrod fdo on haled tow o We Prar-d rams d mot
It. Coll" slow
7rodw.w 1/ hAwvd Agrd
PW-g O.prta-.
• RID TAM THE MY Of LA PWM */•s/SG , FOR
Too it I. vVM mot w Cry po_rq ad Zorriy C.mnincian d w QAr d IA Pots T..s STAR OF TEXAS
la a.p.wd me wd a w .radii- d F,--Foos. A Pansy Crdr. i. *..lamina C0t1NiY Of HAamS
mm w a,Or- of w Cy d Le Pau and ,.Dona w r~lk ar m- wo (No
by oi15014 E B..rM S Kad.nw Owe d w C..rM C.A d /lore Cnuny. I- do
h~ arty 0n tad sow own.a da the a wicats of
001 .r.rr.rtnaeon o No 1r'"wouco i •M df.a r t99a
O.y. A +a+on. N w ,tl aclocc- oft aM r."dw -. 12%
•1 Po" .1 a_.t ad ow ..do
PIN oP� ••Nrim fa.. Na
AIIrC •
fret .nPL
LA pole CAI BEVO6.Y L a/iN14N, O K COlo11Y COUNT.
CAM E +wi...r
or
Belly Rolm
Ornw. to Pin. F-• 0 9
Allow And Zw" Crr--i
Ss�cr ". I. Pau P.-" ad Zoe" Coe.no- (At& Sid)
0"
n�r[r • Asia orw�c(Syr p.[yopr��ra��Trea•'d i[ 3
rr�[V O%wAa jrju.f�. 0- inoC' C
City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing
May 16, 1996
Any person wishing to speak in,-O ROSIMI'ON of -any -item being_ considered by this Commission,- please indicate below by:
A. Printed Name
B. Signature
C. Item Being Opposed
1. A. B. C. .� r
2. A. f� . !! 64 , M<<iL IJ / S B. 6&'eL /y'Yc.® C. G ,
3. A. l�Pi = B.
. C. -�
icQ�
�4. A; B. C.
/5. A
6. A.
7. A.
8. A.
9. A.
10. A.
11. A.
12. A.
13. A.
B.
B.
B.
B.
B.
B.
B.
B.
B.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
C.
,.
City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing
May 16, 1996
Any person wishing to speak i ClF.Ak=1000f any item being considered by this Commission, please indicate below by:
A. Printed Name
B. Signature
C. Item In Favor Of
1. A.
B.C.
"s
2. A.
Q f4 IJ S 6 /J B.
3. A.
a5 5 B.
C.
B.
C.
5. A.
B.
C.
6. A.
B.
C.
7. A.
B.
C.
8. A.
B.
C.
4ov
10. A.
E68 P tt4
B.
C.
11. A.
B.
C.
12. A.
B.
C.
13. A.
B.
C.