Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-23-1999 Special Called Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission• • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 Members Present: Betty Waters, Michael Jetty, Hat Lawler, Melton Wolters, James Zoller Members Absent: Dottie Kaminski, Sandie Staniszewski Citv Staff Present: Planning Director Doug Kneupper, City Planner Masood Malik, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee I. CALL TO ORDER. Meeting called to order by Chairperson Waters at 6:04 PM. II. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 19, 1999 PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING. Motion by James Zoller to approve the minutes of August 19, 1999. Second by Melton Wolters. All were in favor and the motion passed. III. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. Chairperson Waters opened the public hearing at 6:05 PM. CONSIDER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST #R99-002, REQUESTED FOR TRACT 13D, APPROXIMATELY 10.05 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF 26.720 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE ENOCH BRINSON LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. S, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A ZONE CHANGE FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) TO HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (HI). . Staffs report presented by Masood Malik. Doyle Toups, on behalf of Highway 146 and 225 Limited Partnership, has made application for a zone change for property located on the west side of SH 146 and north of SH 225. The owner intends to develop a faality with truck maintenance and rail served warehousing, which requires Heavy Industrial zoning. The front of the property along SH146 will remain Light Industrial, landscaped with trees, shrubs, and evergreen plantings. Four public hearing notices were mailed to property owners adjacent to the site. Staff did not receive any responses. Staff recommended approval ~f the request. If approved, the Planning and Zoning Commission requested that the owner/developer be required to maintain landscaping even if it involved installation of an irrigation system. 1. PROPONENTS Doyle Toups presented the Commission with a computer generated drawing of the site in question. The Commission had concerns about appearance since the property is located at the City's entrance. Mr. Toups assured the Commission that appearance of the facility is a priority for the owners and a great deal of attention will be given to landscaping and screening. Fencing will also be installed. Ma~amum consideration will be given by the owners to make the property as Planning and Zoning C~ission • Minutes of September 23, 1999 Page 2 of 2 appealing as possible. The owners are willing to donate some land for the purpose of erecting an entrance monument to the City. 2. OPPONENTS There were none. IV. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. Chairperson Waters Gosed the public hearing at 6:20 PM. V. CCSNSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ZONE CHANGE REQUEST #R99-002. Motion by Melton Wolters to recommend City Council approval of Zone Change Request #R99-002. Motion seconded by James Zoller. All were in favor and the motion passed. VI. STAFF REPORTS Mr. Malik gave an update on activities of the Census 2000 Complete Count Committee. A report was distributed showing development activities within the City. VII. ADJOURN Chairperson Waters deGared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Pe99Y ~ Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Approved on this 18th day of November, 1999. B W rs Chairpe on Planning and Zoning Commission • ZONE CHANGE REQUEST #R 99-003 Application No.: _ `I ~ - D03 OFFICE USE ONL.v~ ~: $100.Op Date Received: I o - l q - 9 q Receipt No.: (D `vr ~ a • City of La Porte e5~u~~d is9z APPLICATION FOR ZONE CHANGE REQUEST ()Site Plan () l~nor Development Site Plan ()Major Development Site Plan ()General Plan OSite Plans Submitted on Appliant's Name: Address• ~~X~3 ~ Date: i o -- I ~~ ~ Owner's Name• S ~ nn ~ Address: _ `~f'~'m Ph: 5:~~ Property Legal Description: l--£5 [ I ~ ~ 1~) k r~ ()See Attached Sp~C-c.R ~ C~ i ~ C-5 I AM THE OWNER OF THE I~~REIlV DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND ~Z~1~ ~. ~I CIC6 k S IS AUTHORI7Rn TO FILE THIS APPLICATION ON BEHALF. Date• ~ n - r~ - ~1 ~ Signature• `'r(_A~,VI I.1 u 1 Zone: l~ 2~_ Requested Zone Change: C~ ~M ~M ~ SIC No: Proposed Usage:. ©~ ~C ~ ~/~ C, p 6 , OFFICE USE ONLY 1) Planning & Zoning: (a) Preliminary Meeting - , (b) Public Hearing/Mtg. - Recommendation Applicant Notified of Date(s): () 1st bitg. Adjoining Property Owners Notified: 2) City Council: (a) ro) Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Regular Meeting - Public Hearing/bitg. - Adopted by Amendment Ord. Signature: ~-~_~,~ `~, . ~1 ,~_..~ #1501 - I'tl Il..., l t i; . 1 .. I+..... T....... --;-i t t t.- r~r f~ ~-~ a.~~n ( ) 2nd Mtg. Staff Report November 18,1999 Zone Change Request #R 99-003 Requested by: Frank D. Pickens, Owner Requested for: Lot 109, Block 8, Spencer Highway Estates Location: 3709 Clazksville Street Present Zoning: Low Density Residential (R-1) Requested Zoning: General Commercial (GC) Background: The property described above is cwrently zoned R 1 (Low Density Residential). The applicant also owns lots 107 and 108, block 8, Spencer Highway Estates facing Spencer Highway, zoned General Commercial (Exhibit A). The tract in question is occupied by apre-existing non- conforming structure (1500 sq.ft.) used as a contractor's office. This facility was constructed prior to November 29, 1971. This is the date when Spencer Highway Estates was taken into the City of La Porte (Ordinance 905). At the time of annexation, the property in question was assigned a zoning classification of R-1 Residential. This was done under the provisions of Ordinance 780, the Zoning Ordinance in effect at that time. On January 26, 1987, as part of the comprehensive rezoning o~La Porte, the property on lots 107 and 108, block 8 facing Spencer Highway was zoned general commercial. The comprehensive rezoning was in conjunction with the adoption of the City's present Zoning Ordinance No. 1501 and as an element of La Porte's Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The purpose of rezoning is to allow remodeling of the building and improving the site in general. The facility has operated a nonconforming use since annexation. The applicant is seeking this rezoning as a means to alleviate a degree of nonconformity. If granted, this rezoning would render the building a conforming use in the general commercial zone. The staff, in reviewing the applicant's request, found it to be rea sonable. The azea in which the subject tract is located, based on the criteria established by City's Comprehensive Plan, is suitable for either the present zoning or the requested general commercial. Conformance of a zoning request with the land use plan is one consideration among several criteria to be considered in approving or denying an application. Other criteria may include: Zone Change Request #R 99-003 , P&Z 11/18/99 Page 2 • Character of the surrounding and adjacent areas; • Existing use of nearby properties, and extent to which a land use classification would be in harmony with such existing uses or the anticipated use of the properties; • Suitability of the property for the uses to which would be permissible, considering density, access and circulation, adequacy of public facilities and services, and other considerations; • Extent to which the designated use of the property would harm the value of adjacent land use classifications; • Extent to which the proposed use designation would adversely affect the capacity or safety of that portion of the road network influenced by the use; • Extent to which the proposed use designation would permit excessive air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution, or other environmental harm on adjacent land use designations; and, • The gain, if any, to the public health, safety, and welfare due to the existence of the land use designation. Based on the above issues, staff finds the requested change conforms to the present zoning and uses of nearby properties. The tract in question is suitable for the requested change. Development within the subject tract should not negatively impact the surrounding properties and should not harm the value of nearby properties. It would not have a significant impact on traffic conditions in the area and utilities would not be affected. Conclusion: There was no apparent error in assigning. the present zoning designation to the tract in question. However, by virtue of location and underlying land use designation, it does satisfy the criteria established for general commercial zoning. ff the applicant is able to demonstrate that the requested zoning would represent the highest and best use of the property, granting the requested change would not be contrary to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. SPE'NC~'1~ HT~ Y. .~~~. ~~ ~.. ~. 20' BLDG. L/NE 1 G - C G NERAL COMMERCIAL N P G~ P N O' ~ O, LT. 12 ~ ~ LT, 107 n LT. 108 n LT. 18 ST ATg5 ~ _ ~,~ E ~, N~ER ~ SpEK 8 '°• gL 73.99' 73.99' EXISTING ZONING LINE LT. 109 LT. 17 '~ . 20 • BLDG. LINE _ O' x BLDG. L T. 13 ~..1 ~ ,1 ~ ,,~ PROPOSED ZONE CFIANGE -. ~`J ~v, ~'" ~v' ~'`-' ~` 'v, R - I RE IDENTIAL EXISTING MOBILE I10ME LT, ll0 LT. 16 ZONE CHANGE 99-003 5 ~~ h~ ti ~ 420,21<C) 250 • 1360 CITY ^F LA P^RTE SPENCER HWY. 137.5 75 75 75 4 3 2 1 ~ ~ o n mo v y 0 00 ~o ~o ~ O 1 75 75 75 5 6 7 8 Oo .^i0 No O~ 1 p~ ° ~ I 137.5 75 75 75 75.63 75.63 75.63 78,63 9 10 Il 12 o ~s~ ~~ 0 O 2 ~O O 1 ~ 75.63 73.63 75.63 75.63 16 15 14 13 ~~ ~~~ ~~~ o- O o0 N o 00^ ~ O o - O I O~ 1 73.63 75.63 75b3 75.63 73.95 73.95 70 92.65 62.35 55 55 65 65 65 107 108 18 19 X20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ o n ° ~ 0 ^ I o N {., mo v N I I tr of 0~ 1 0\ to ~ T OI 0\ I T. of 7399 73.99 6853 70.97 ~ 55 65 63 65 x,109 1 3 09 17 139.5 m c 64.52 65 65 65 65 65 ~ A309 'O e a .3110 N ,; 42 ~ 41 40 39 38 37 148 P -0016 ~, 2 ZONE CHAN(~ 110 16 ~ o ~ ~ v ~ I. °v = m r°~i ~ ~ m ~ .. X 3113 0 ° ~ o ~o° 00 ~°o mo° -0110 13725 -I 0` I ~° m I m I 65 65 65 26 27 28 Ill 15 3414 65 65 6s 65 65 65 M^NTG^MERY LANE ~° ~ -ools _ 136.61 A M^NTG^MERY LANE 17 Isl.zs 161.26 36 m 371s1zs 56 161.26 ~ N 112 'O 3210 14 ~ ~ Q ~ 3201 1 0 3202 ` ° ~ 3p2~057 ,m, - 3 ; -0111 3206 -0013 ~ 65 6o bo so so bo 1512 5 -0035 1,7~g 0055 W 113 43 4 4 45 46 47 48 ~ 18 3217 ~ ~ I E ~' ~ ~ I~ I ~O J \~ laez ~ X13 'O Q -1 .. ~ N v ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ : ° ~ r N v " '~ 136.19 ~ moo ~°o o" ~ o~ o '" - 151.25 151 z5 (~' 114 _ ~ o ~ 19 34 3204 39 ~, S4 ~ `° 3209 'O 12 30 1 ~` ~ n ~, ~ ~ ~ 0 2 0 ~ 6s so bo 6o so bo q tstzs ~ 151.26 034 `O IsQ~9 3D053 ~ Q 115 C~ 131.48 Gl 86.61 70 7o ul.es 27.64 ~ 20 33 40 53 U ~ o ~o 11 [Y 56 ~ 55 54 53 3 52 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ t ae2s ~ 3 .0 3231 -0020 ~ 3213 ~, 116 0011 133 75 „ ~ ~ ~ N m ~ ~, . ~ W -0040 15126 ~ . o M O . N c ~ ^~ 2 ~ 21 ~ 1 ~ co.° I ro.1 Z y n 32 ~ n 41 ~ 52 0 ~ ~s ~ ~ 7 ~ I stzs ~ ~ ~ 111 ~ ~ ~ ~ 117 m 3218 ° ' 35,61 7p 70 ~ 151.26 ~ 3217 ~ ,~,~ -0010 c ~ 22 31 3218 ¢ ~ 42 51 3222 '" -0116 ~ ~ 9 ~'a ,~, 32335 ~ -0032 v ~ 3225 '~° -0051 . n 118 Q"~~.Lq ~ -0022 151.25 -0042 15125 a ~ , 1 3g 2.79 85.51 90 83 1 g 6 ~ 6 23 30 43 50 ~ 2 7 3226 ,~ u+ 3226 Z °~ ,,2 3234 65 65 65 65 85.85 109.15 36 35 34 Np ~ ~ n VO ~ oM Y~ ° ~ of m I ,^, m o 65 7.95 47.05 61 g 85 49 ~ 22.95 13j,0g 50 N o 9 \~OS.O e fno m. c" R ~, A ~i ~ ti+2~ 51 3 ~ .~ p sip ~~ !~ ~ ~ 1b ~ b~ ~~~ ~ '~P ~ 91 e ~ ~ "'c°o 9 `~tiv bA 9O 7j~'9 0~' 'C S I 6A 89 i~ °90 ~~ bA '~~88 ',gay 87 • A Meeting of the La Porte Planning aad Zoning Commission (Type ofMeeting) Scheduled for November 18,1999 (Date of Meetiag) to Consider _ Rezone Request#R 99-003 (Type of Request) aEC-~%~9 PLANNING I have receaved notice of the above referenced public hearing. I am OPPOSED m granting this request for the following reasons: Name (please print) Signature 2 ~ Address city, smote, zp I am in FAVOR of granting this request for the following reasons: • A Meeting of the La Porte ~" ~/ Planning and Zoning Commission ~~"`°''~~ • ~~ (Type of Meeting // a 9 9 Scheduled for ~~4~~~~~7 November 18,1999 (Date of Meeting) to Consider Rezone Reguest#R 99-003 (Type of Request) I have received notice of the above referenced public hearing. I am in FAVOR of gn;ntiag this request for the following reasons: This property was purchased as commercial and rezoned due to LaPorte incorp oratin g this lot and building into the city. We plan to use the 1,500 Sq.Ft. building as an office space. I am OPPOSED to granting this request for the following reasons: t'IZ~r~~ ~ . t `CKtnc~ 142 ~,~4~~ iN~4-I Name (pleas Tint) Address 779 ~goat~e city, state, zip FAIRMONT PARK EAST, SEC. VII PRELIMINARY PLAT ~~ ~ r yr LA F'UH i E PLAT/MAJOR D~~LOPIVIENT SUBMITTAi. aPpucarlON fAil plat ,eubtttlttal~ tq wb rnvltlwad rtnci rontalcinrtir! for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission must be accompanied by this application and necessary documentation listed herein. Submittals will not be reviewed by staff without this application.} OFF7CF. USE ONLY unr~: Arcrivr•.n: ~ 0 -Z ('~ SUB,-~~,,; _ 9 9 -1 ! tctcr•_P~ r• $ S I PLLtiNINC .ft ZO.*rL`:G biEST~G ' PA1E: // - /~_ 99 Type of Submittal: General Plan (_) Preliminary Plat { X) Final Piat (_~ Major Development Site Plan [r) Date: 9L3o/99 Contact Persontsy: J.w. Gartrell, Jr, phone: 409/935-2462 Name of Proposed Development: Fairmont Park East, Section~~~e~t ~- Name of Developer: ~ Eddxe V. Gray, Trustee Phone; 281/42-3677 Address of Developer: P.o. so:~ 638, Baytown, Tx 77520 tllumber bf Sections: One Number of Lots: ~8 Legal Description of Property: Shown on Plat 15.4191. acres y ~ Filing Fee: Amount: ~ ~~• ~ ~ Receipt #: d0 ~S/y Checks shoutd be made payabl"e tv the City of La Porte. List Ail• Other Gontact Persons: Name Address hone Fax Stag' Report Fairmont Park East, Section VII November 18,1999 Preliminary Plat Requested By: Mr. Eddie V. Gray, Trustee Requested For: A 15.4191 Acre Tract out of the William M. Jones Survey, Abstract No. 482, Harris County, Texas and being a part of a 266.154 Acre Tract described in Film Code 184-69-2052 in the Oi:Fice of the County Clerk of Hams County, Texas. Present Zoning: High Density Residential (R 3) Requested Use: Residential Subdivision -(Note: Single Family Dwellings are an allowable use in a High Density Residential Zone.) Background: Fairmont Pazk East is a residential subdivision off Driftwood Drive and located between Spencer Highway and Fairmont Parkway (Exhibit A). The General Plan for Fairmont Pazk East, Sections Five, Six, Seven, Eight and Nine was reviewed and approved by the Com}nission dwing their April 16, 1998 meeting. As required by the Development Ordinance, the City has received the mylaz of the approved General Plan. As a part of the general plan, the developer had set aside 10.00 acres in Section VI for the detention. Analysis: Staff using Development Ordinance 1444, Section 4.04 as a guide, has reviewed the Fairmont Park East Section VII Preliminary Plat and found it to be in substantial compliance with applicable ordinance requirements. Staffhas reviewed the plat for conformance with zoning regulation and goals and intents of the City's Comprehensive Plan. As indicated by the zoning designation, the proposed subdivision is compatible with the underlying High Density Residential (R 3), where Single Family (R-1) dwellings aze permitted uses. As proposed, Section VII has 681ots, which is 4.41 units per acre, the same as the designated criteria established in Section 106-334 of the Code of Ordinances (Exhibit B). Fairmont Park East, S. V~Preliminary Plat • 11/18/99 - P & Z Meeting Page 2 of 2 Staffwould note that Section 5.02 of the Development Ordinance empowers the Commission to require pedestrian sidewalks when it feels their inclusion will serve the public interest. Staff recommends the inclusion of sidewalks within the Fairmont Park East Subdivision. Responsibility for construction of the wallcs should be specified by covenant as well as stated in writing on the front of the final plat document for each section. Staff has listed items below that need to be addressed by the developer with the submittal of the final plat. • Payment of $438.91 shall be made to the City for street sign installation. • Payment for street lighting in the amount of $6,663.68 shall be made to the City. • Approval from the franchise utilities regarding the size and location of the proposed utility easements shall be provided for City review and approval. • Construction drawings for water, sewer, paving & drainage shall be submitted for review by staff. • Payment of $11,900.00 is due to the City in lieu of parkland dedication. This figure is based on a $175.00 per dwelling unit. The money will be placed in an escrow account and will only be used for the acquisition or improvements of public park land or facilities located in Park Zone 6, the zone in which Fairmont Park East is located. • Subdivision covenants/deed restrictions for Section VII shall be provided to the City for review and approval. Conclusion: Staff has reviewed the plat and found it to be in accordance with the zoning and development ordinance of the City. Staff recommends .approval of the preliminary plat for Fairmont Park East Section VII. • N. FAIRI~A ~P~ 86CflON 48 SALE 1' ~ a00' F~P~~T FAIRM01~ P ~ FAT 8ECT101d FAiiMONT P ~F~T FAIRMIONT PARKWAY tHIBI~' • . ,r.. ' '~. ~. , r' ~~ }- '; 1 ' x i p ~ V ~: d " U ~ o ~ ~ 1 x ri t I•~ y ~~, -I I ~- I~'~ 1;^1 ' ~~ h ..~'~w~: „ 4 1 Ati ~a oF'I a~ ~d ~'a,r+ :r, I ILM. r f r Ur ~ : ~?k n i 'a 11 ,1 1 ~ +g~ tl~ YI I I ,I „I X fi ~N M~ ~ ~ ~~ny ~ .. FI YIA?J1 I1Sot 5 S ~`"~ 'L' ~'I ~ I. I ~. I' ...:I r ~Y ,~~ ~~I~ r~~ 7 0 ' ''+ ,,~~r444 g .M S; It}F L ! ~ 7~+ ~ ~+. <' I .. 1 nli kAGfJ 1' HnNK~CA~f CC •~1 DJ?}: Fd~,~r ;, ,••! ,Ir~ii•,, 51,, ~j'' > I I I. •.ISI171URC1I -i.d I~t a nu,.,w '~ u ~ rL ~ ~ i ~p n.'q. .. iv vi i. * w s ' ~~ '~ s . ~ ~1..Lp. ~ ( .y .. Y'~ it pda' "f:!u a ~^+ rr~N~r'r '1~1, I.1~ ~tl' p~. Lt~`~~/1 ,L X G h~ Y `= •~ , , ~, , N i~ I,I I ~• ~~ t '~r•1 '.(d~^ '~ rLl~~rs[ ~tC~y~ IYX I ~ P n ~ to J ~ le ~'. {' ~ 111 , ~ , 1%r ~ ~ / .( r I a I 1 pit •T t 'a9 j~ i~f'4~~u' I- r a ,I k ~ ~ ~. M't' S:I , . ~ ' ~i J~ / F ~r r i 2 3 4 r 4 .~1 ` `a 'Fr+~'~j' :, . tG~ ~F; '` ~. n I ~ L ' ~ v 'rf Ys a N ~ "' n ~ ~ N z' ~I~`~~ ° •~ ,I: ip Ilx I MI _~7+1"nr ~ M+k ,'a~7,~;;, i _ } ~ { k k ~. , ;y,+y# ~ ,' Y _.. 'l.y .'• _... I ' 4 m. .... War ^ Npl' „d6~„ ~I~y ,' , ~ F ; y ORAYWOpd COURT /'~ 'l ~' Gf~AYWODD . CbURT (50' ROW) `5r,r,~, ~' r s } ~ ~. ~ 1 .: ~ y"'v t .;. P~ _ R r ~ 9 n < ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - ~ 1 ~ 1 r '. I r«m .._Y io'w Rw•_..• ly w ~ .,q ~~^' I . ~ !7 } L r r; 4i ~ O ~ ~' , ~ O ~ . ~ ~ I ~ F ~ ii rxx°., I ~'~.~ r I z ~ M 'I i I~ ! ~ .{...~ , . ,~, rfi , 4 t~l ~~ U' I1 I 1 i.'.w./1 ~rl •~ ~ ~ '• ' o -1 M I r .l ~ ~ 1 y '" « ] ~~ Il ' Y I r ? 7 I ~ ; s,l ~ Ifs 6 7 }: 8 ~ 9 •, rl r 1 ~ I~ 7{' C' ~~ { "1 I r .: , ~ ~ ~ . L, ~ « Iy i ' . ~ ~=7' I I i }, I ~ xr„w : 1 r:* C , .• ~~ rrr x T 'r• ~ I :~ 1 I I° 1 Illa LSArI Y q~.~K9irP'I ~1 '"' ~''~y .»~ ?~ '? r:l , a , . ~ ~ ' ! ~ ~, _.~ .~.: ..... M1t. ~. «... „~~° . .. ~'.nlr/1_.. mre laVly... 9rN+~ I,j,~ '+ I" 5 ~ :, ' ^ 1 / t. , r, ~, u t ~ ~' I j, coowooD counT 1 DOGWOOD,. COURT (50' ` L .~ r#~~ R ~4 ow) R ' ° ~ .i n I I ~ i r ~ ,. 1 ,I r !r' 1 w ~• I Jr Lq.... ATtB'; W'pp" 14~ r''~a' ~ '• L, n 9 I la rrfx I. •,MI I ~ ~.~ yr •!~, t ". v L r r Y ' li I" '! rl ~-n~°Lp 1 ~ ~ rry~ r w r ., 1 ~,. ',' •' c t ' ., ~ , f , +Y '~ ,/) ~ ux. 1'.,,' k' ~ Iti'Id'11 r~y+"y t, v ~: ~ ' ;, r ~ ~ ? ~^ ~' ~O ,""')`419'x.18 a 17 K 15 "s:'15~Y14tis3''''?1 r t+` t K ~ u r Y °' ~ F ' I ICJ .~ ~1F ~~. y I r a 'i~7 k o , ' ~ „ t " ` •~ ~ ,~ Y ~ 1' w I _ G, ,~ "~ at 1 _~ 6x' ~~''. wl ~.,?94°, ~..'W d" b9I~ ~ 1~~4Ya~~ Y ~I ~ k 1 /~ II / ~ y ~ ~, r .t a /• ~ '' ~ .; li i l " , ', ~ b ', 1 I I r2 r >3 ly 4 y .. 5 6 ~~ ~ ~ xr~ 7 r 1 4 n I _ E ~ ~ ~ . a ~ ' L. a. v •, '~ . ar ° r \ .. / .. - 7« n W I ~~ fl r rL y~~ •,~ ^ ~ ~' ~ + ' ~': { .: .. M1, r ~ _.. r !':t ~ ., 1 10 M1N lair/ '. y~ ns e, '. ~ ~ I • ae I.! _ _._1k!•r ._ .. uv _. ~_waa : 1!'sv ~.,.N ~ /!!^"L'a^r~ ~~~ PINEIYOOD COURT . ~ I •^~ ~ - ~ ' ' '" • r x ' '.• PINEWOOD COURT ('S0'; ROW) "~l' +iu,, a+. _ - _~1 y , w Ilya ~1 ~ . r .Y • ula noe - Iroo l ulx a1M° aor o , rw, ~(~• ..: I ~ .... ,. .. 111x. INIi 1 i L+rC • C 1°'k ,, Y~ / ,«r d ' ,;' / off. ~` ;~ 2 3 ~ 4 , ~ ~ g ~ ~ y IY~2, ' ;,,, . f r , n, ° x , r~ ~~ ,. ~~ (v ltr ~ ',~ // ~ _ r,f6 na ... r '~ Yn^~,~j s N`Gr.Q:. • Q I r' «t a, __ k1ap. ua0' .-3~ ~ 1~0¢'~ v '' a Q', , ~ ~ 1 r•n, e•pf urM an of M'9N'. • ! ° ~ •:,// _8 ;i. 9 ~ i O , 1 11 ~ 12 ,", 13 A 1.4 ' ~ 1`5"~ ~;'c: ' ~ ~• I t ' ~ ROSEIVOOD COUl;T •~ .. _ _ to Uln [tirri ~ _ r ~~ ~"N~i ° + °+ •._.. .4 _4 .P fw._.... .r__,.r .... I..knx .,.,. ._..^J5N_ ... ~..l3,QY ..... :'4k] !°°' ~„~r3 ` w M- ~+ « ROSEWOOD COURT (50' .~~20W) ., a ~'~1 } ~~" ?grt ~-y ~ f1 t r. J ~ : ~ 4 N I. ri .I'N X 3 ' o ~, a r. 11 ~n ~?, '., IMF 1 ~1°" ~f ` , Y• I ' , ti n r 1 ~ ~1/ y L ~ ; ~ ~;:.ax ;l(I~ ~r . 4;.y fx .r ,,.. ~ SiCdr . I r c1~~NA ^, 'ta .5y~yp. '' .4 • ~ g ~' •:, F ~, 7 ,. >'~ 1 - 1,, - rr • 1I 1.' / r1 / ~ I ~. I ':: I. ~',, I ' PnriabloNr r~,u:NI rAST. ~.l:z flON ~,:al :r,l a R7 '~ . ' i '' ~1 ~ H '~ M C~ .. eo.>ZOr JAPdl~.S N1 G/1R'1' w ~~IiJ ~<.~ NL~V. ~.,. . ~I ''i 1 •, / L ~, -, i 1 yr ,, ... .. I ~. , .... '. .. w..$.Nti~,...L..r.. ar I , l: Ir M 1 /~ 'Ll nr~ 6°IV' -.-a~tQr ~rn'In Y fx - - 1 ~MOfi ~-/II n{' k004°'~'. MKI •Y,1~~ ~ •..rJ 1 ,1114 LSMI '~ 11 - ti //~L.. ,:: 1, •±~; '~lP/l2~1 ,l123f;, 22~ 21„ 20~ 19 ~ 18 ~.17~: 16~µ`,1~;~ _ • ~a •~n51~+~1 ._ °Ip~{ " y~ci, nn~,,,~~ I. _ _ .In'" ' ~L' 0rR ~ _ ~ 11"'~a 4~ ~ y