HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-17-2000 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
.
.
OATH OF OFFICE
.
.
OATH OF OFFICE
Pamela Baldwin
I. ' do solemnly swear (or affirm), that
I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of
Planning & Zoning COIIunissio!j of the City of La Porte.
State of Texas. and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect
and defend the constimtion and laws of the United States and of this
State and the Charter and ordinances of this City; and I furthermore
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly or indirectly paid,
offered, or promised to contribute any money, or valuable thing, or
promised any public office or employment, as a reward to secure my
appointment or the confirmation thereof. So help me God.
d~~~,
Sworn to and subscribed before me this the
September 2000
21
day of
(:>"'::.
~
Notary Publ1 for e
State of Texas
'.
.
.
Minutes
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF AUGUST 17, 2000
Members Present: Melton Wolters, Hal Lawler, Dottie Kaminski, Ross Morris
Members Absent: Betty Waters, Ralph Dorsett
City Staff Present: Planning Director Doug Kneupper, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong,
Planning Secretary Peggy Lee
I. CALL TO ORDER.
Meeting called to order by Vice-Chairperson Wolters at 6:05 PM.
II. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE MAY 24,2000, REGULAR MEETING.
Motion by Dottie Kaminski to approve the Minutes of May 24, 2000. Motion seconded by
Ross Morris. All were in favor and the motion carried.
III. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 15, 2000, REGULAR MEETING,
Motion by Ross Morris to approve the Minutes of June 15,2000. Motion seconded by
Dottie Kaminski. All were in favor and the motion carried.
IV. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PREUMINARY PLAT OF FAIRMONT PARK
EAST SUBDIVISION, SECTION EIGHT.
Planning Director Doug Kneupper presented staffs report. The preliminary plat for Section
Eight of Fairmont Park East was submitted by Eddie Gray. Section 8 consists of 4 blocks
and 56 lots on a 12.4793 acre tract.
Mr. Kneupper reported that the General Plan, which included Sections 5,6, 7, 8, & 9, was
approved by the Commission in April 1998. At that time, approximately ten acres were set
aside for storm water detention in Section 6, but the Final Plat for Section 6 reduced that
amount to approximately 8.5 acres. The following issues were noted regarding parkland
concerns:
· The Fainnont Park East Homeowners Association Board has previously contacted the
City regarding parkland issues.
· Staff contacted the Board to see if there might be an opportunity to work with the
homeowner's association in redesigning the detention basin to be usable park space.
.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of August 17, 2000
Page 2
.
The homeowner's association was willing to discuss development of the detention basin
into usable parkland/open space. They also expressed interest in acquiring additional
parkland/open space for private use by the homeowner's association.
.
Staff visited with Mr. Eddie Gray regarding the Association's open space concerns and
the possibility of securing parkland/open space by applying the parkland/open space
provisions of the Development Ordinance to Sections Six thru Eight If this provision
were applied, the resulting park/open space area would be approximately 1.28 Ac.
.
Mr. Gray indicated that he preferred not to have any parkland/open space extracted
from Section Eight He hoped to continue the platting process for Section Eight
without interruptions or delays, and without changing the proposed lot pattern.
.
Mr. Gray then visited with the Fairmont Park East Homeowner's Association President
regarding their concerns.
.
Fairmont Park East Homeowner's Association (Board) met on Tuesday, August 1, and
discussed this issue. The Board President verbally reported to Mr. John Joems the
following:
· If the City (by applying its Ordinance) could only secure approximately 1 Ac. of
land in Section Eight, then the homeowner's association would rather work
with Eddie Gray, the City, and the Association as a team to develop the 8.5 Ac.
detention basin as a park area.
· The homeowner's association requests that an off-street parking area be a part
of this effort They also would like a reasonable space around the perimeter of
the detention basin for transition to the basin, landscaping, walking trail, etc.
Staff is interested in these features along with the desire to have Mr. Gray's designers look at a
lot plan that does not back. homes and fences up to the basin/park area. These issues were
verbally communicated to Mr. Gray.
The Commission asked Mr. Kneupper to clarify whether or not the residents were in favor of
developing the. detention basin to also serve as a park area. Mr. Kneupper and Paul Rone,
(president of the homeowner's association) indicated that was correct
Staff recommended approval of the plat subject to certain conditions.
Motion by Ross Morris to approve the Preliminary Plat of Section Eight of the Fairmont Park
East Subdivision with the following conditions:
· Developer to file an amended General Plan to reflect the concerns of parking and
adequate space around the detention basin.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of August 17, 2000
Page 3
.
· Request planning for the residential portion of Section Five (currently unplanned) to
account for additional parking along with the goal to avoid lots backing up against
the detention basin.
· The submittal and approval of an amendment to the General Plan of Fainnont Park
East Sections Five thru Eight will be required before approval of the final plat for
Section Eight.
· A reference that the developer is responsible for construction and installation of
sidewalks within the Section Eight (including Driftwood Dr.) should be stated in
writing on the final plat.
Motion seconded by Dottie Kaminski. All were in favor and the motion carried.
v. STAFF REPORTS
Mr. Kneupper encouraged the Commission to review the "Highlights Report" included in
their packet. The report shows recent development activities within the community.
The efforts of the City and the consulting firm of Hawes Hill & Patterson to create a plan
that focuses on improving various aspects of the neighborhoods on the north side of town
are nearing completion. The Northside Neighborhood Plan will eventually be forwarded to
City Council for their consideration. Commission Members will receive a copy of the fmal
document.
The consulting firm for the Comprehensive Plan Update, Wilbur Smith Associates, is in the
process of preparing a report from the comments received from citizens during the Open
House/Reception held on June 20th at the Sylvan Beach Pavilion.
VI. ADJOURN
Vice-Chairperson Wolters adjourned the meeting at 6:25 PM.
Peggy
Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary
Approved on this 21st day of September, 2000.
~(.J~
W ers
Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson
.
.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
EXHIBITS
1. STAFF REPORT
2. MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS
MEETINGS (3-9-00, 3-16-00, 4-13-00, & 5-
24-00)
3. OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC COMMENTS
(PREPARED BY WILBUR SMITH
ASSOCIATES)
.
.
Staff Report
September 21, 2000
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
PUBLIC HEARING
AND
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Bacqround:
The Comprehensive Plan Update was initiated with the Community Forum
that was held at the Sylvan Beach Pavilion in October 1998. Citizens
attending the Forum were asked to provide their thoughts and comments
about the City.
A steering committee was appointed by City Council that reviewed the list of
comments generated from the Forum. With the help of a facilitator, the
comments were divided into common themes. Staying with these themes or
chapters, the steering committee prepared Goals and Objectives that
addressed different areas of concern within the community.
The city's planning consultant, Wilbur Smith Associates, took the goals and
objectives prepared by the steering committee and began fonnulating the
different chapters that make up the Comprehensive Plan. Each chapter
contains Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Actions.
As the planning consultant prepared chapters of the Plan, the steering
committee would review the documents and make comments. Additionally,
the City's Executive Staff would review the chapters as they became
available. The task of reviewing the chapters was completed by December,
1999. The consultant incorporated comments from the steering committee
and city staff and submitted a second draft of the Plan by the end of
February, 2000.
The Commission began their fonnal review of the document on March 9,
2000. Members of the Steering Committee were present and provided
comments to the Commission. Staff and the consultant were on-hand to
present the following Chapters to the Commission.
1. Introduction
2. Community Vision
3. Community Profile
4. Land Use
On March 16, 2000 the Commission reviewed two more Chapters:
5. Transportation
6. Utility Systems
On April 13, 2000 the Commission reviewed:
7. Parks and Recreation
8. Community Facilities and Services
9. Residential Development
.
.
Comprehensive Plan Update
2000-2020
September 21, 2000 P&Z
Page 2 of2
10. Beautification and Conservation
On May 24, 2000 the Commission finalized their revIew of the
Comprehensive Plan by reviewing Chapters
11. Public Safety
12. Redevelopment Strategy
13. Implementation
On the evening of June 20, 2000 the City hosted an Open House at the
Sylvan Beach Pavilion. The purpose of the event was to infonnally present
the Comprehensive Plan to the citizens and stakeholders of the community.
. Attendees were asked to provide specific written comments regarding any
and all chapters of the Plan. The planning consultants have assembled the
comments into a report that is attached for your infonnation.
Although the Commission reviewed and commented on all chapters of the
Comprehensive Plan, the City's past practice has been to have the
Commission host a Public Hearing regarding the Plan and then forward a
recommendation to City Council.
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MARCH 9, 2000
Members Present: Betty Waters, Melton Wolters, Dottie Kaminski, and Hal Lawler
Members Absent Sandie George
City Staff Present Assistant City Manager John Joems, Planning Director Doug Kneupper, City
Planner Brad Ellis, Planning Coordinator Masood Malik, Planning Secretary
Peggy Lee
I. CAlL TO ORDER SPECIAL ~D REGULAR MEETING.
Meeting called to order by Chairperson Waters at 6:05 PM.
II.
RECEIVE STATEMENT FROM . CHAIRPERSON
RESIGNATION OF JIM ZOu.ER.
REGARDING
Chairperson Waters announced the resignation of Jim Zoller. She stated that Mr. Zoller was
an asset to the Commission and his absence will be sincerely regretted
III. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE TO ROSS MORRIS, NEWLY APPOINTED
FROM DISTRIcr 3.
Peggy Lee administered the Oath of Office to Ross Morris.
IV. CALL TO ORDER WORKSHOP MEETING.
Chairperson Waters called to order the workshop at 6:08 PM.
A. RECEIVE OPENING STATEMENT FROM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
STEERING COMMITl'EE CHAIRMAN.
The Steering Committee Chairman was unable to attend the meeting, therefore,
Committee Member Pat Muston addressed the Commission. Mrs. Muston said a lot
of long hours and hard work went into the draft Comprehensive Plan the
Commission is now reviewing. While preparing the plan, they took into
consideration everyone's comments from the Town Meeting held at the Sylvan
Beach Pavilion on October 27, 1998. The Committee's best efforts were given to
this project and they are very pleased with their accomplishment
B. RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STEERING
COMMITI'EE MEMBERS.
Committee Members present were Pat Muston, Imogene Pulleine,John Tomerlin,
NIartha Love, and Peter Griffiths.
.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
.Minutes of March 9, 2000
Page 2 of2
Committee Member Imogene Pulleine reminded the Co~sion that this is not a
short-term plan, but rather a plan to last for twenty years. Committee Member John
Tomerlin added he would like City Council to consider the comments made by the
citizens at the Town Meeting and s12rt by first providing the basic services our city
needs and expand from there.
C. BEGIN REVIEW OF THE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.
Chris Bryce, of Wllbur Smith Associates, reviewed Chapters 1 through 4 with the
Commission.
1. CHAPTER1-INTRODUcnON
2. CHAPTER 2 - COMMUNITY VISION
3. CHAPTER 3 - COMMUNITY PROFILE
4. CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE
The only change the Commission recommended Was a new objective for Goal 4.5 in
Chapter 4; to consider creating a large lot residential zoning district and provide the
associated regulations for that type of zone.
V. ADJOURN WORKSHOP MEETING AND RE-CONVENE SPECIAL CAlJ..ED
REGULAR MEETING.
Chairperson Waters adjourned the workshop meeting and re-convened the special called
regular meeting at 6:40 PM.
VI. STAFF REPORTS
The Commission agreed to begin review of Chapters 5 and 6 at the next meeting.
VII. ADJOURN SPECIAL CALLED REGULAR MEETING.
Chairperson Waters adjourned the meeting at 6:45 PM.
Peggy
Planning and Zoning C~mmission Secretary
Approved on this ;)-.1 day~f April, 2000.
~~rU~<1)
Betty W ers .
Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MARCH 16, 2000
Members Present Betty Waters, Melton Wolters, Dottie Kaminski, Hal Lawler, Sandie George,
and Ross Morris
Members Absent
Ci1;y St~ff' Present Planning. Director Doug Kneupper, City Planner Brad Ellis, Planning
Coordinator Masood Malik, Police Chief Richard Reff, Fire Chief Joe Sease,
Director of Public Works Steve Gillett, City Attorney Knox Askins, Planning
Secretary Peggy Lee
I. CALL TO ORDER.
Meeting called to order by Chairpqson Waters at 6:00 PM.
II. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 17, 2000, REGULAR MEETING
AND PUBliC HEARING.
Motion by Mdton Wolters to approve the minutes of February 17, 2000. Second by Dottie
Kaminski. All were in favor and the motion passed.
III. ELECT VICE-CHAIRPERSON
Motion by Dottie Kaminski to dect Mdton Wolters as Vice-Chairperson. Second by Hal
Lawler. All were in favor and the motion passed. _
IV. OPEN PUBliC HEARINGS.
Chairperson Waters opened the public hearing at 6:02 PM.
. A. CONSIDER ZONE CHANGE REQUEST #R99-005 FOR A 5.0809 ACRE
TRACT, BEING PART OF TRACTS SA, SC, AND 8E, W.]. PAYNE
SUBDIVISION; BLOCK 2 OF TIlE W.}ONES SURVEY, A-482, IN THE
10000 BLOCK OF SPENCER HIGHWAY, LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY,
TEXAS. THE APPUCANT IS SEEKING A ZONE CHANGE FROM
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL
(Ge) TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE BUILDING WITH
AN ADDmONAL PARKING AREA FOR TIlE BUSINESS KNOWN AS
TWO CAJUNS' CAFE.
City Planner Brad Ellis presented staff's report for Rezone Request #R99-005.
Zdda Wright, applicant and owner of Two Cajuns Cafe, and co-applicant Eddie
Gray, have requested a zone change from High Density Residential to General
Commercial for 5.08 acres, which includes La Petite Academy, Two Cajuns Cafe,
,
.
.
Planning and Zoning. Commission
Minutes ofMan:h 16,2000
Page 2 ofS
and an undeveloped parcel. A restaw:ant is not an allowable use in a High Density
Residential zone and Two Cajuns Cafe is a non-confonning use. Ms. Wright intends
to construct a new building to the north with additional parking to the east of the
existing building.
Staff recommended approval of the zone change.
L PROPONENTS
There were none that spoke in favor of the request
2. OPPONENTS
There were none that spoke in opposition to the request
B. CONSIDER ZONE C~GE REQUEST #ROo-OOl FOR LOTS 1
THROUGH 32, BLOCK 329 OF LA PORTE OUTLOTS LOCATED
BETWEEN NORTH 'J!ID AND 3BD STREETS ALONG BARBOURS CUT
BOULEY ARD. BLOCKS 328, 330 & 331 WILL BE LOOKED AT.AS A
COMPREHENSIVE REZONING OF THE AREA. THE APPUCANT IS
SEEKING A ZONE CHANGE FROM GENERAL COMMERCAL (GC) TO
BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL (BI) TO ALLOW CONSTRUcnON OF A
TRUCK SALES CENTER.
City Planner Brad Ellis presented staff's report for Rezone Request #ROO-001. The
applicant, Amyn Nars~ requested a zone change from General Commercial to
Business Industrial in order to open a used ttuck sales center in the 300 Block of
Barbour's Cut Blvd. Truck. sales are not an allowable use in a General Commercial
zone. In addition to the applicant's request to rezone Block 329, the City requested
that Blocks 328, 330, and 331 be considered as part of the rezone request in order to
provide a more uniform zoning district along Barbour's Cut Blvd.
\
L PROPONENTS
Davis Wilson, an Architect with Wtlson Zetty Associates, stated that
in addition to used truck sales, the proposed business would also sell
new ttucks. There will be an indoor showroom, as well as an
outdoor showroom.
2. OPPONENTS
There were none that spoke in opposition to the request
V. CLOSE PUBUC HEARINGS.
Chairperson Waters closed the public hearings at 6:16 PM.
.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of March 16, 2000
Page 3 of 5
VI. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ZONE CHANGE
#R99-005.
Motion by Melton Wolters to recommend City Council approval of R99-00S. Second by
Sandie George. All were in favor and the motion passed.
VII. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR ZONE CHANGE
#ROO-OOl.
Motion by Dottie Kaminski to recommend City Council approval of ROO-001. Second by
Melton Wolters. All were in favor and the motion passed.
VIII. REVIEW DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.
Chapter 5 - Transportation Thorovghfare S.ystem
, Bret Keast led discussions regarding'transportation planning. Mr. Keast nored that the
proposed Farrington Road extension has been a significant issue for numerous residents in
the Lomax area. Residents from the area attended a steering committee meeting and stated
their objection to the road extension. Wtlbur Smith Associates, addressing the technical
aspects of extending Fatrington Blvd., prepared a technical memorandum for city staff. Mr.
Keast reviewed with the Commission, the advantages and disadvantages that were listed in
the memorandwn.
Fire Chief Joe Sease addressed the Commission. Chief Sease described a need for north to
south connector roads within La Porte. Cross streets are not present in the subject area
possibly due to the fact that the Lomax area originally was a city unto itself. The location for
the proposed Fire Station 3 remains undecided until such time that a decision is made
regarding Farrington Blvd. Other streets to consider as north to south connectors might be
Airport Blvd., on the east side of the airport, and Valleyview, between 'CP and "L" Streets. A
major incident occurred during the last year at the railroad overpass on Spencer Hwy. Sens
Rd. was shut down and the only way to move ambulances out of the area, because they were
located down \Vind of the spill, was via Underwood Rd. Chief Sease also nored that a unit
responding from Fire Station 2 to North "Rn Street at Lomax School Road currently travels
3V2 miles. The distance would be reduced to % mile if Farrington were extended. Extra
starts and stops for fire trucks mean longer response times.
Police Chief Richard ReEf addressed the Commission. Chief ReEf stared that a crime study
was recently conducted to determine where activities were occurring within the City. With
this information, the Police Dept is better able to deploy officers with quicker response
times. The subject area had the second highest number of activities reported in 1999. When
comparing response times, this area had a considerable delay due to the fact there are only
two ways to gain access. The connection to Lomax School Road would allow easier access
with lower response times. OUef ReEf agreed with Chief Sease that additional north to south
.
..
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of Match 16,2000
Page 4 of 5
connections, such as Airport Blvd. and VaIleyview, would also help f.J.cilitate the demand for
easier access with quicker response times.
Mike Claussen, Director of Operations for the La Porte School District, addressed the
Commission. Mr., Claussen stated he lives one block off Farrington and travels Farrington
to go home. There is a problem routing school buses in northwest La Porte-because of the
limited north to south routes. Mr. Claussen favors the extension of Farrington to help
alleviate the district's transportation problem. There is a safety concern for buses and
parents that must travel the busy roads of Underwood and Spencer in order to transport
children to and from schooL As a member of the LEPC, quick evacuation of a school might
be necessary and this roadway would help in that situation. The district could realize a
savings since shorter bus routes cost less money.
Director of Public Works Steve Gillett addressed the Commission. Mr. Gillett is
sympathetic to the need for north to south roadways. Responding to comments made
previously about utilizing Airport ~lvd. for a north to south route, Mr. Gillett infonned the
Commission that Airport Blvd. is located on airport property, therefore can not be
considered. He added that airport activities have slowed down considerably since the
departure of the flight school that operated from there. In order to attract a new tenant to
that location, approximately six acres in the center of the airport, previously leased by the
Texas Air National Guard, will soon have a looped 'road with utilities constructed up to the
paved ramp. When asked about the possibility of future airport expansion, Mr. Gillett '
answered that the surrounding residential development has limited the chances for runway
expansion.
Mr. Keast noted that at the time the last Comprehensive Plan was prepared, it was
anticipated that the Lomax area would develop with a higher density. Since this is not the
case, the City may wish to consider establishing a roral residential designation for the area,
which would limit density to large residential lots. If a collector roadway is constructed then
the city should conduct a review of the future land use plan in order to control and manage
growth in that area.
Chairperson Waters stated that the steering committee, as well as the Planning and Zoning
Commission, during previous meetings, discussed and were in favor of designating a large lot
rural residential designation for the northwest area of La Porte.
The consultant and staff will work on creating a new zoning district for large rural residential
lots for the Commission to consider at a future meeting.
The Commission recommended the extension of Farrington Blvd. to North "R" St be
included in the Thoroughfare Plan. Neither the Commission, nor the consultant
recommended the extension of Farrington Blvd. from North "H" Street to SH225 be
included.
.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes ofMaxch 16,2000
Page 5 of 5
The Commission discussed the extension ofValleyview between "H" and "L" Streets as
another north to south connector. It was noted there is a pipeline conidor that runs
somewhere along that route.
The Commission recommended Canada Rd., between Fairmont Pkwy. and Spencer Hwy.,
also be included in the Thoroughfare PIan.
Chapter 6 - Utility Infrastructure System
Bret Keast led discussions regarding the Utility Infrastructure System. Mr. Gillett described
the existing condition of the City's utility infrastructure system. The Commission was
pleased with the contents of this chapter and did not recommend any changes or additions.
IX. STAFF REPORTS
The Commission agreed to review ,Chapters 7 through 10 at the April 13th meeting.
x. ADJOURN
Chairperson Waters adjourned the meeting at 7:40 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Peggy .
Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary
Approved on this :L1 day of April, 2000.
~G'Z<Q.~~-,
'Be a '
Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 2000
Members Present Melton Wolters, Dottie Kaminski, Hal Lawler, Ross Morris
Members Absent Chairperson Betty Waters, Sandie George
City Staff Present Planning Director Doug Kneupper, City Planner Brad Ellis, Planning
Coordinator Masood Malik, Police Chief Richard Reff, Fire Chief Joe Sease,
Assistant Fire Chief Champ Dunham, Director of Parks and Recreation
Stephen Barr, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee
I. CALL TO ORDER.
Meeting called to order by Vice-Chairperson Melton Wolters at 6:05 PM.
A. REVIEW DRAFT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.
1. CHAPTER 7 - PARKS AND RECREATION
2. CHAPTER 8 - COMMUNITY FACIUTlES AND SERVICES
3. CHAPTER 9 - RES:Q)ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
4. CHAPTER 10 - BEAUTIFICATION AND CONSERVATION
Director of Planning Doug Kneupper introduced members of Executive Staff
present at the meeting, Planning Staff, and Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee
Member Pat Muston from the audience.
Bret Keast, of Wtlbur Smith Associates, led the, review of Chapters 7, 8, 9, and 10.
The Commission agreed that a recent report prepared by the Police Dept should be
included in Chapter 10. No changes were suggested for the other chapters.
II. STAFF REPORTS
The Commission is prepared to review Chapters 11, 12, & 13 during a May meeting.
I
III. ADJOURN
Vice-ChairperSon Wolters adjourned the meeting at 6:45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
p~~
Planning and Zoning Commission Secretdly
Approved on this 2r day of April, 2000.
(~lf~tLW~/ 'Jdk
M ton Wolters '
Planning and Zoning Commission Vice-Chairperson
.
.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MAY 24,2000
Members Present Betty Waters, Melton Wolters, Hal Lawler, Sandie George
Members Absent: Dottie Kaminski, Ross Morris
City Staff Present Planning Director Doug Kneupper, Director of Emergency Management Joe
Sease, City Planner Brad Ellis, Planning Coordinator Masood Malik, City
Attorney Knox Askins, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee
I. CALL TO ORDER.
Meeting called to order by Chairperson Waters at 6:00 PM.
II. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 27, 2000, SPECIAL CAll..ED REGULAR
MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING.
Motion by Sandie George to approve the Minutes of April 27, 2000. Motion seconded by
Melton Wolters. All were in favor and the motion carried.
III. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE TO RALPH DORSETI'.
City Attorney Knox Askins administered the Oath of Office to Ralph Dorsett.
IV. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDING PLAT FOR SUMMER WINDS
SUBDIVISION, SECTION 3.
City Planner Brad Ellis presented staffs report. The Commission approved the Final Plat
for Section 3 of Summer Wmds Subdivision on May 20, 1999. Earl Wtlbum is requesting a
first amending plat in order to reduce a 16' utility easement to 8' on Lots 27, 28, and 29 of
Block 1. This action will provide more space in the backyards of these lots. HL&P, Entex,
SWBT, and Time Wamer Communications have no objection to the amendment Staff
recommended approval of the first amending plat
Motion by Melton Wolters to approve the first amending plat of Summer Wmds
Subdivision, Section 3. Motion seconded by Sandie George. All were in favor and the
motion carried.
V. REVIEW DRAFI' OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.
Breat Keast, ofWtlbur Smith Associates, presented to the Commission, a brief overview of
the following chapters of the Comprehensive Plan Update:
CHAPTER 11 - PUBIlC SAFElY
CHAPTER 12 - REDEVELOP:MENT STRATEGY
CHAPTER 13 - IMPLEMENTATION
.
.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes of May 24, 2000
Page 2 of2
The Commission discussed various el~ents of the chapters, but no additions or deletions
were made to the draft.
The next meeting will be a community forum. This meeting will be an open house format
with no formal presentations made. Comment sheets will be provided for citizen input.
The consultant and staff will try to schedule this meeting for the third or fourth week in
June.
Mr. Kneupper informed the Commission there might be slight modifications made to the
Implementation Plan, such as updating the Capital Improvement PIan.
Chairperson Waters requested a report be prepared that shows projects from our current
Comprehensive Plan that have been completed, as well as projects that are being carried
over to the new Plan. Everyone agreed this was a good idea.
VI. STAFF REPORTS
Mr. Ellis reported that Reverend Stillwell withdrew his rezoning request, therefore the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission will not be forwarded to City
Council.
Mr. Ellis also stated that the Zoning Board of Adjustment would hear a nonconfonning uses
case on June 1st.
VII. ADJOURN
Motion to adjourn by Sandie George. Chairperson Waters adjourned the meeting at 6:55
PM.
Respectfully submitted,
~
Planning and Zoning Commission Secretary
Approved on this 20m day of July, 2000.
/71 ~ 0~-e.-~
Ildly Wl1tca fYlemn W~l~.s .
Planning and Zoning Commission Oiairp~C36n 'v1e c.. c'hlA.,' r peY-s <<"n
.
.
Open House Public Comment
La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
On June 20, 2000, the City held an open house for the purpose of presenting the draft proposed
Comprehensive Plan Update. The following comments were offered to the City concerning the
Transportation, Land Use and Parks and Recreation Elements as well as a few general
comments and requests for copies of the plan. Where provided, the authors of the comments
are identified with names and addresses.
Transportation Comments
1) Collector Street indicated on map does not exist between P and H. No name given.
2) I am opposed to the plan for North H Street to be made a through street: We asked at City
Hall if the bridge would ever be put in on North H Street before we built our home there and
were told it would never happen. Now you want a 4-lanel Janice Meekins, 10315 North H.
Street.
3) I am opposed to the Farrington Street extension. This creates safety problems with the
airport. This does not seem reasonable to me. Clarence Morgan
4) I am opposed to Lomax School Rd. becoming a through street because it would induce a
traffic intensive environment and create more activity, creating more neighborhood
problems. Nolan Allen, 10834 North "C" Street.
5) Ladies and Gentelmen: My name is James C. Adams, a citizen of La Porte, Texas since
1983, residing at 1606 Lomax School Rd. On the subject of Farrington being connected to
Lomax School Road, I am totally against this. Right now my house is surrounded on three
sides; one by a gas pipeline, the other by a city-owned lot, and the other by the rodeo arena,
with Lomax School Road in between. The pipeline is a continuous danger due to its nature.
The city-owned lot is not cut on a regular basis, therefore it has become a mosquito
breeding ground and a thoroughfare for motorcycles and horses from the soccer fields. As
for the rodeo arena, we used to have a quiet neighborhood, but now this arena is used by
every cowboy within 75 square miles. We lost our softball fields because of this arena. Now
after all this, the city wants to put this road through, connecting Farrington with Lomax
School Rd. Folks, I moved here to get away from all this heavy traffic and have really
enjoyed this area. However, the thought of this road going through almost makes me ill. At
present, my two children are 10 and 13. I hate to think of them riding their bikes to
neighbors with what will definitely be a very heavy used road. I had dreams of retiring here
in Lomax in 10 years, but the thought of the danger to the children and all of the horseback
riders using Lomax School road is stuck in my mind. To my knowledge, I know of no child or
rider every hurt on Lomax School Road by vehicular traffic. Mark my word, this will change
if this road is connected, dumping Fairmont and Spencer workers and students through
Lomax. I really hope that our city council and planners will reconsider this move. After all,
Lomax I considered outlots of sizeable portions, not a subdivision. This connection will
destroy what we have worked so hard for here: quietness, safety and peace of mind. Thank
you, James C. Adams, home phone 281-470-2378 and work phone 409-945-3340.
6) The Lomax area we bought 10 years ago. It was a place you could have livestock. in the
city. Our kids have raised animals there for 4-H and FFA. Our kids walk their animals and
ride them. In the last few years more houses are being built, and the traffic is getting bad. I
have to call the police all the time about people racing and driving 60 to 80 miles an hour
down P Street. If you widen Lomax School Rd. or extend it, it will be even worse than it is
now. Debra Santiago, 10610 North P, La Porte, TX
7) Will there be an overpass at Shoreacres Blvd. and 146? No name given.
8) I am opposed to the plan to make "H" Street in Lomax a through street to Underwood and to
build at bridge over the Harris County Flood Control ditch and I am opposed to the plan of
Page 1
.
.
Open House Public Comment
La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
making Lomax School Road a through street from Spencer to Hwy. 225 and I am opposed
to any 4-lane stretch in Lomax. Let it stay an agricultural area. Thanks, Alton Meekins,
10315 North "H" Street
9) Extremely unusual that our Councilman and Mayor are not even herel I would really enjoy
discussing this, but with who? I am totally opposed to the road expansion on Farrington. If
you would like to discuss this you can reach me at 281-479-2450 or 281-471-8430.
10) I have listened to the City Fire and Police Chief presentation for road expansion. Nobody
with the City stated any cost saving for the City. I am against the Farrington Road
expansion completely. It will mean more traffic and a safety hazard for my children. I am
disturbed that the Mayor could not show up for this meeting! You can reach me at 281-470-
0758. Chris Santiago, 10610 N P, La Porte, TX, Solvay Polymers, Deer Park, TX
11) Perhaps, the most advantage, the City of La Porte gets out of this Comprehensive Study is
to change the image of this city from being a port-related type business community to a
"Bedroom Community". People can live here in La Porte and go to work somewhere else.
b. Bay Area water, the Gulf area is our biggest asset, but people get scared when they see
a bunch of trucks moving around and parked around. I think the City of La Porte should
not allow "Truck Stop" related operations where people get turned off and don't get a
very good impression about the City. Truck stop operation creates lots of problems, air
pollution, noise, too many lights around the stop. This kind of business must be stopped
in order to create a nice commerciaVresidential type impression.
c. One more thing, the City should encourage the owner of metal buildings around 146 (on
both the sides) to have them freshly painted. Maybe the City should consider providing
them a can of fresh paint.
d. Another thing is to do palm tree landscaping around Barbour's Cut, Main/Spencer and
Fairmont Parkway intersections.
e. Change the name of "Barbour's Cut Blvd." to something like "International Blvd.,
Commerce Blvd., Bayshore Blvd., etc. to appeal to the outsiders. It is hard to spell
Barbour's Cut Blvd. I do not know why we have to constantly say we do not want
Farrington to have any extension across Spencer Highway to 225. We do have a school
with children that could be endangered by this! I teach my school children that the
government can be trusted and a vote does count. Your council members were told
what the voters wanted. Then you get a subcommittee and do exactly the opposite.
The plan for Farrington is not immediate, according to you. Just delayed. STOP IT!
Nancy Quested. P.S. I may have forgotten my glasses, but I will not forget your actions!
12) I believe that the City should seriously reconsider "opening up Lomax with the Phase I
Farrington connections as well as proposed H Street extensions and roads to the north of P
Street. This is a restricted neighborhood - not a dumping ground for through traffic and
container trucks. I have talked with TxDOT officials and studied the FAA. 150-5300-13
Regulations and Standards and this road going through the RPZ goes against the safety
standards established in that document. As far as safety goes, the video going to council
says it all. Putting this road through an area of no sidewalks, deep ditches, and heavy, fast,
traffic isn't just a bad idea, it is a serious violation of public safety. Please view the video.
Bill Scott, 281-470-6682.
13) A meeting is supposed to be conducted in a manner that allows all involved to air their
opinion, discuss options and come to an equitable solution. This was nothing more than an
exhibition w/pretty pictures. Please don't waste our time unless you really plan on trying to
accomplish something. I am opposed to any kind of "new road" in the Lomax area!
Currently there is enough that needs to be "FIXED"I Hand P Street both need overlays -
not shoddy patch jobs that are worse than the potholes. The two schools in the area need
improvements. Currently we have children riding horses, walking livestock down the street -
Page 2
.
.
Open House Public Comment
La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
more traffic will increase the danger to these pedestrians and residents of this community. I
see no real benefit to putting the road through - just a ''waste'' of money to please a few
"outsiders". Call me and I can give you more input on this quality of life now and what will
happen if Lomax is "cut up" needlessly. Thank you. Ronda Lunsford, 10280 North H, La
Porte, 281-471-2024, 713-844-2347.
14) CONCERN: Safety of Farrington Blvd. Regarding excessive auto/truck traffic if allowed to
be a major thoroughfare between Fairmont Parkway and the Lomax area.
OBJECTIONS:
a. Proximity of school zone with attendant Foot and bicycle travel by students.
b. Fairmont Park. recreation ball diamonds, soccer field, etc. with heavy parking at curbside
on Farrington Blvd. with foot traffic across Farrington Blvd.
c. Narrow street without adequate right-of-way for proper widening.
d. Lowering of property values in proximity of a major traffic artery.
e. More suitable alternatives exist and must be considered. Gideon Jones, 10403 Quiet
Hill, La Porte, TX 77571, Phone 281-487-4287
15) I am opposed to making H Street a secondary arterial. This is a neighborhood - larger lots
don't want through traffic. I/we don't want bridge put in on H Street. I like the neighborhood
traffic as is. Clarence Morgan.
16) Lomax does not need H. St. connected to Underwood, nor do we need Farrington
connected to Lomax School Rd., nor do we need N. H Street connected to Barbour's Cut.
This is an agricultural area where people have moved to for many reasons. (a) We want our
space and the right for our children not to worry about walking on sidewalks down the street
and having to worry about speeding traffic. Our children walk their animals down our streets
and if you do this construction, their safety will be drastically reduced. As far as the fire and
police, we already have a fire station and police do not have any problems now that I have
seen. We also do not need a bridge over the drainage ditch. We are on a less traveled
road now than L St. and P St. and that is why we bought on H St. If you open that up, you
will double the traffic on N. H. Lori Druelanbredt
17)1 PROTEST CITY COUNCIL AND OUR REPRESENTATIVES' ILLEGAL ACTIVITYI No
road connecting Farrington to N. H. St. This is a rural neighborhood community with lots of
children and livestock and the Lomax residents enjoy use of this road for riding, exercising,
FFA events, etc. This proposed cut-through the City is trying to push through is illegal. It is
clearly against FAA regulations, and airport transportation regulations. The City is highly
aware of this and is trying to circumvent the rules underhandedly. Clearly there is an ulterior
motive for all this skullduggery. The people of Lomax have protested this for years. This is
unnecessary use of our tax powers. The city is feverishly trying to find reasons to justify this
road. Something stinks! ALSO - NO bridge connecting subdivision to N. H St. this is also
totally unnecessary and will only provide non-Lomax residents a means to cut through our
rural neighborhood and run it!! We are not a highway but a way of life in Lomax!! Stop
ignoring the deepest wishes of the people you are supposed to represent. -
18) I am "STRONGLY" opposed to connecting Lomax School Road to Farrington. This issue
has been opposed by the neighborhood. Our opposition has been expressed verbally to
City Council and in writing and before the steering committee. Traffic is heavy and fast
already. If you turn Lomax School Rd. into a connecting thoroughfare and/or a 4-lane road,
it will be impossible to get in and out of our driveways and become "very" dangerous for our
children and livestock. When you connect H St. through to Underwood, you compound the
traffic and safety issues for all of us that live there. These are large lots and there are
MANY horse ranches and people with livestock. These people are Shuttling horses and
livestock on foot and in large trailers at all hours of the day and night. This will be a
Page 3
.
.
Open House Public Comment
La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
catastrophe. It is also illegal to put this road by the airport - another serious safety problem.
Cher Barron, 1602 Lomax School Rd.
19) Finish Canada St.! Use Allies for Trash pickupl No name given.
20) After much discussion with the City and the Planning and Zoning Commission members, I
still do not see the necessity of extending Farrington to Lomax School Road or the H Street
bridge. I've been told there are fire, police and school transportation issues, but have been
unable to see any data/research that has been done by these departments. The former
Lomax area is one where children raise animals, learn how to farm and generally enjoy
being able to walk, ride bicycles and horses. People move to this area to have the land to
do these things. Less houses means less traffic; however, another through road will
generate more cars in this neighborhood. If there is data on the response time, number of
deaths caused by a delay in response time or any other explanation for why our tax dollars
will be used on a project that so many people in the area oppose, ,I would greatly appreciate
having access to that data. La Porte has many other areas which could use improvement -
roads in the main part of La Porte, senior citizen transportation, etc. I would gladly agree to
my tax dollars being used for necessary improvements. Mona Grable, 10610 North H
Street, Phone #281-470-0379
21) I oppose the opening of Farrington and the bridge on H Street "dead end". If the people in
Glen Meadows want an easier way to get to the schools, then have the school board
change the boundary lines back and have their kids go to the school right across the street
from their subdivision. We have been in Lomax all our lives - some of these people just
moved here and want to change every thing. We like Lomax the ''way it was". We are
already having a hard time with places to ride our horses - unless of course, we want to rent
the arena. Thank you. Aimee Biro, 10322 N. H. Street, 281-471-2971
22) June, 2000. I am a homeowner in Glen Meadows edition off Spencer and Farrington and
am opposed to the proposed extension of Farrington Rd. through to the Lomax section, and
in future administrations of City government, on to 225. Safety is my main concern for each
of us residing here. There are many, many children in this edition who would be exposed
unmercifully to 50-60 mph, 4-lane highway traffic. This is un-acceptable. Also, my wife and
I moved out here because it was such a quiet edition and especially living next to airport.
Please be heard before plans are locked in granite. H. "Rocky" Kelley, Glen Meadows.
23) The N. H Street bridge and the Farrington connection are not necessary and will not
effectively enhance safety. These points are merely being projects that NOBODY WANTS.
The City is looking for backup on their illegal plans. No name given.
24) Please consider/research residential area between S.H. 146 and North 16th on Barbour's
Cut. (Speed Limit). Current speed limit is 40 mph. From S.H. 146 to N. Broadway is 35
mph. From Barbour's Cut to Main Street (on North Broadway) is 30. (Not residential)
25) Why are you trying to open Farrington to H Street if you're concerned with safety? I'm not
surprised the City of La Porte holding this informal meeting where you don't have to meet
the people in person. You heard the people at the last open hearing and you didn't listen to
the people who don't want their home and lives destroyed. We own property here in La
Porte because we want to have a few animals. My family has owned property in La Porte
since 1955 and wanted to make this our home because it was the closest thing to country,
but also be able to make a living. There were people trying to get involved in the planning
works and none of you listened. This meeting to get the people's input was the BIGGEST
JOKE! No name given.
26) Per your "redevelopment strategy" you list Heritage, Neighborhoods and Small Town
Atmosphere as ASSETS - yet your transportation plans concerning H Street (Farrington Rd.
connection and H bridge) are going to destroy those very assets you brag about. Lomax is
full of western and rural "heritage". A wonderful area to be proud of in this "concrete jungle."
Page 4
.
.
Open House Public Comment
La Porte Comprehensive Plan Update
Lomax is in itself a unique "neighborhood" which its residents fiercely want to protect. It is
on enviable sanctuary. Lomax exemplifies the best "small-town atmosphere." You cannot
disagree. To what financial gain is the City willing to jeopardize this; it's "ASSETS." Clearly
the road plans mentioned are not for the good or benefit of "the people." They are for the
benefit of something or someone else - City Council and representatives listen up - we are
not stupid! No name given.
Parks and Recreation Comments
27) We would really like to see the Parks and Recreation Department acquire the property
across the street from the fitness center (where the dilapidated, vacant apartments are now
locates). An outdoor fitness center/trail system that connects to Little Cedar Bayou Park or
a neighborhood park would be excellent uses for this land and add to the visual appearance
of the drive down S. Broadway. Crissy Stanley, 231 Forrest Street
28) All parks should include trash receptacles that are maintained and emptied often -
additional receptacles for recyclable items should also be included and used toward
maintenance expenses. No name given.
Land Use Comments
29) Area 5 of Sylvan Beach is shown as low density residential now, and mid to high density in
Year 2020. We are very much opposed to this, having just built a new home. Other bay
front residents also oppose this. Fern Young, 230 Jefferson. Pat and Joe Mock, 219
Sylvan.
30) A large area, including much choice bayfront property south of Sylvan Beach Park is now
shown low density residential. The Year 2020 plan is not acceptable. It shows it all mid to
high density - condos or apartments where many of us now live. The main attraction to La
Porte (even with many other merits) is being able to enjoy our nice new ultra modem home
on the water. Please change the plan. Ed Young, 230 Jefferson.
General Comments
31) You good guys made sure there weren't enough copies for anyone to have to shoot down
the plans that affect our homes. Kay Scott
32) Larry and Marie Meek, 10422 Quiet HiII- How will this affect our taxes? Zoning issues?
Requests for Infonnation
33) Jim Schul, 301 E. Fairmont Parkway: Please mail a complete e-mail of the community plan
schul@tenet.edu, or schul@laporte.isd.esc4.net
34) Baxter and Crissy Stanley, 231 Forrest St., La Porte, TX 77571: Chapters 1,2,3,4,7 and
9,10
35) Kay Scott (Sharon Tally), 1802 Lomax School Rd., La Porte, TX 77571: Copies of all
36) Rhonda Lunsford, 10280 North H St., La Porte, TX 77571: All chapters please
37) Sib Carpenter, 5234 Glenpark, La Porte, TX 77571: Chapters 1-13
38) Sue Gale Mockkooken, 410 S. 1st St., La Porte, TX 77571-5113: All Chapters
39) Patricia Mock, 219 Sylvan, La Porte, TX 77571-6439: All Chapters
40) Elsa Blakely, 314 W. Main, La Porte, TX 77571: Mail copy of redevelopment chapter
41) Please mail me information or have someone call me regarding zoning, land use and plans
for a fire station, etc. Also I would like to talk to someone regarding TTRZ. Kelli Lannia
281.470.9111.
Page 5
.
.
FAIRMONT PARK EAST
AMENDED GENERAL PLAN
EXHIBITS
1. STAFF REPORT
2. VICINITY MAP
3. AMENDED GENERAL PLAN
.
.
Staff Report
September 21, 2000
AMENDED GENERAL PLAN
FOR
FAIRMONT PARK EAST
Request:
Requested By:
Present Zoning:
Background:
Analysis:
Approval of Amended General Plan for Fainnont Parl<: East, Sections 5
through 8
Mr. Eddie V. Gray
Low Density Residential (R-l), and General Commercial (GC)
At your meeting on August 11, 2000, the Commission approved the
Preliminary Plat for Fairmont Park East, Section 8 with the following
conditions.
1. The developer shall file with the City an amended General Plan for
the area east of Driftwood that would reflect the concerns of parking
and adequate open space around the detention pond.
2. As part of this amended General Plan, show a general layout of the
residential area south of the detention pond. Account for additional
parking along with the goal to avoid lots backing up against the
detention basin.
3. The submittal and approval of an amendment to the General Plan of
Fairmont Park East, Sections Five through Eight will be required
before approval of the final plat for Section Eight.
The applicant has submitted an amended General Plan. The amended
General Plan does address the fIrst part of condition number 1. An area has
been reserved for the future creation of a parking lot. The area is roughly 00'
x 00' and could accommodate approximately 00 cars. This facility would
eventually serve patrons visiting the detention /park area. The second part of
. condition number 1 has not been addressed. There is not enough detail
shown on the General Plan to indicate the area between the detention pond
boundary and the top of the detention pond slope. The City's Drainage
Criteria Manual, which was adopted after the construction of this detention
pond, requires a minimum 12' of open space around the perimeter of
detention ponds. The goal here is to provide enough usable area around the
perimeter of the detention pond to be able to perform maintenance and
provide amenities such as a walking trail and landscaping, etc.
The amended General Plan addresses the first part of condition number 2. A
single family residential layout is shown. However, the second part of
condition number 2 has not been addressed. No attempt has been made to
avoid lots backing up against the detention basin. The Plan shows 12
residential lots backing up against the detention / park area.
Fainnont Park East
Amended General Plan
September 21, 2000
Page 2 of2
Summary and
Recommendation:
.
.
The City, Developer, and Fainnont Park East Homeowner's Association
(Board) have had preliminary conversations regarding improvements to the
detention pond to create parkland / open space. All three parties are in favor
of this action and it appears some future improvements will be made to the
detention / park area if approved by City Council and the Homeowner's
Association.
Chapter 7 Parks and Recreation, which is part of the City's updated
Comprehensive Plan, provides some park site selection criteria. One of the
criteria listed is that desirable views into and out of the park site should be
optimized. Constructing wood fences along the entire length of the southern
park / detention boundary does not optimize the views into or out of the park
site. It has been the City's experience that parks with low street visibility are
not aesthetically inviting and are not well utilized.
Another item to consider is access to the commercial area adjacent to
Fainnont Parkway. The Commission may want to consider an internal
access system for that area that would limit and reduce the number of future
driveways directly connected to Fainnont Parkway. This would reduce the
number of driver intenuptions along this major arterial roadway.
The City, Homeowner's Association, and the Developer are interested in
creating a park and recreation area within the existing detention pond. The
City and the Homeowner's Association have a desire to construct a quality
park environment with a feeling of openness that attracts park patrons.
The Commission, at the August 17, 2000 meeting, was clear in stating that
this amended General Plan achieve the goals to avoid lots backing up against
the detention basin and provide additional open space around the perimeter
of the detention pond. The submitted amended General Plan does not
achieve these goals.
In addition, it is staffs recommendation that efforts be made to plan for
future driveways within the commercial area adjacent to Fainnont Parkway.
Based on the above statements, staff does not recommend approval of the
submitted amended General Plan for Fainnont Park East, Sections Five
through Eight. It is recommended that the Developer follow the guidelines
established by the Commission when the Preliminary Plat for Section 8 was
given conditional approval.
MUNICtPAL AIRPOR1'
~L
UAlN
RESERVE G (GC)
FAIRMOM1' pARK
':4oe
FAIRMON! pARK
&4-C
~ARK
fi EASt'
8EcnoN .
FHRMON!PARK
EASt'
8EC'I1ON M
FAIAMOH! PARK
~4-C
FAlRMONT PARK EASt'
8ECT1ON TtI&
,
I
I
FAIRMON1' pAN( EASt'
8ECT1ON'1WO
FAIRMOI'IT PARK EASt'
8ECmON SIX
H.CJ',C.D.
~POND
AfPROXIMAlS-Y U IDE8
FAIRMONT pAN( EMT
8EC11ON atE
JIROP08B)
8ECI1ON II
11.11 ACRES
I
RESERVE (GC)
FAINIClN1' JW<<IIAY
FAIRMONT PARK EAST
SUBDIVISION
. "
~.~n=~, n. i. .~:--::-:::7~ ._Uli_ x: ;0:" .~:< :~::~~::~~::~~::~~:;~:>;:: :~U~:.~:~~: ;~~~~~:~~~:::::!.::::~~:~ ,:~:: ::.~:~ of .
6"~"l'; t........ H2. . ""=:;. -0"".,,.; "'... ...., t.""f .. ~......... . . . Sooth. . ~,.O"'-=. of 1,0":" :~, 0.0 "" '.C. " .. .. ,"",. u. ,... ..,,;. . .
~ I =~~~~1ii~:~:' ~~~~~[~~;~:~~=~~;~i~~~:~~~1~1~~~;
. ~ f. i.;:;;~;,,,i~~~;~~~,:;:;'7:~':""ol=. u.. I.&S~''''';' lino~f: ". ~:~ S3:....:-E, ."";~"'~ "':';':30 fH: t~'7' <0:.,., . r
.-' . 'nrt'UCE Sc.u~ .- G.;....':...&n~ cf' J6E..:!~ 1tre'':. u. ~ ;.>O:..a::. 1Ci~ 0"
. . .' eo:....:...... u.. ""'"':t. """ 1i.. "' h:..,-..n,:' '",.wa,., :S, ,,.,,. S~ '-'T'ON fIVE I
- --,e:L--cc-- . . . _ ., ': ,-e..,. ;;~::-' -:_~c..'~-----T-"c .'.- ---, ,,- ----~--"~<" +---~-,.- -'. ---"-1
,. I . . .
i ' . :
-- ~1 ~ .~ ~ ~~..~ ~~r-' - -- ..- ~.--~. -- --1 - ~. _.:...~~-= ~- .~,:- --, -----.1
. . ~ '" ;;t.l :,._,., ..__". , _'.
\ . .' , ' , ._":- '. ~ . "'; <; <L ~...' _..l..~ . :..,....,.. ':' ~~... ;
- - _....l.. -'-J- -\'- _'~.J.... .~+: -',.., ,..! ''7'>,. I~ .." P=/. --------- '.' ~ . --.~., ". '." '.. I'
' ~ ..,l\ ,. I' :,..' I . ~-'~" - ~ ' ....7 ". .
.. . -.- 1 .. .. -i Bl~~~".c . -1,,--, .. -'~ - ; . .. " .. ~ ..... I ~..:... . . . !
..." .-\.......I._.~' ~.-'L.~t:_' :..-/.' .: :.' .'. '. ".:,~,-:::-~...:..~~_~/~_~/-;;;:.,~, ~ .t- .
--- .r.. '\ \- ~ ---i '.~ . . .. ,. :.. :- )Z . .'. ~ .' ~ .,-t.LTI_.>:, ., . ~,'." . "!=;~f"""'-O"~
=--.,",,(. .' ,.~===.:.== .1 I ~~ ~:. -- ~ ' . ~.. '.' ..; "=:' '.,;-:." . '. . '\. ;.:-~.... ". . :~.=,.......H.,,;:,
"--"', '. ~~"" ::';'---:---:-:;;''3 '. ''-----: . '-',"~~ !?'-..:... ./' ."E .. I '. , 7;:>
. =::<::,.~' 'p-..:--;-~ :~--L~~':"- ~. :~ - -.'; - -.. ~,:," ~.:-~ .'- ." _ .' .. _ ~~-; . -::I~:q=-:;s;.:,.. .;--
~ , ..! ", .' 1. 'j. '...r-: I ", jz..!:> '.':'" ,j. . ~ I .' I j .~~-_.-=-- -'.1,', "~':;j" . I
-;:;1);,' ::~ :U:_,:.I~"~. 'i'~' H::,:" ,::1 L;~+>-~--':/.' C~K:~;rt~-i~)~+~r~i;:~;jb~ ...{ 1
~i' '.;;$:{ '.J '~i'~ !.M", '-:'j ';", :j~ E: I '.m. -' .: I: (. 1 :I'j" j. 1.1' I ~~"'y._,/,# . J. ~ .1 o.
'. ;:.: i;~f' "'(~' .;'; ~+..L~; . . X I > Yr:;~~" .t~: : ,;' '=-;: .!' ". -C,-. <0, .!(' j,; ::~~ '~'--;~.t2-..JL ~~~\ . ..:/;' .~.~ .j. . .;.
j' 1";". "",>, '. "', e " ,. .,~" ~"..... ."". till DcT~"Jll;..,,, ".~ !" I, ,... I. v---.",. J ..,.... .~ 0:.
" _: ; !::::~ or" '~" ,j!~ ',il!,: ,":j .>'~' ,':< d~~: A i?E Ai:" J; i [f(~G"-'.- "C:'C+: ~~~~,d!Fr o'
I.., :': fjr. ,I I.. . .~. '.' ......". ; , ....rlF~....,.,.""l.!E.<..... l'U: ,.,. ...Jb :', I'" '. ,. i . .k...". . ~~ ./ If)
,..../, - ',,- . ,'>: . ..';; .i.:i., 'I',,,, ';.H';, ::: !.S'jH~'=~?~.~E'-"'f:-:!.# ..,:-." . 01 i~~_~.!" ~~! ..~. . .-/I}-.. -. C\1.
. , "., . . .. l~'i' - , , . .Iijfla.cs .. .~ "..,. ..... ;)"'" ''''.''-' .. , ;r BU)CI; 4I!. , 'j. . . '--
.' ..'; j ;~", - "'-"'.!!; ; ..,....i [i~ ~'liI I.' ___:" ~. , ,--:.--" \: -- -: - i:' i '. ~ :.".~. ~ _ -. Z-'-' ~ ->;: --:-,~ -"" ~~,~ l' - . '0.: L .
j :.:i':! .I: .,.;.;.; ,>. 1i>:./'1t. f?;:.' t(."," '.~. j; ..N.'j;:;:.'~'l~' i-71 k-4'~'7II.."i..l :.'.~." ,.: ""'f')...
~ i:~:lJi' .'~Z;F-. '; 'j~~n'f '/~zo J 'j~l:'; ,.i" . \ Wi .~:. ;J~:~~~.:-~ ;':; ~;-~~/X"._- '.~:: Il_n~
- l.' t',.. Z~l . ':...;: - ';' . '"'->. '. -. 1'=>'" . I ....... ". r'\, ~ , I.' v
-, " '., . P'.'. 1 .1 .: ':".' - : ie, ~ '. : : ,;... : , :. . ::. .' .: : . : " " ." ,6!. ,.' . ._
". ; It~' , ': ," , '0'" . t.E:!, ", .' " I'" .,'. ZE, OAJ,;,\\'ilJ)EClRO.I; IW, ,. ct
. ." /}'.,;I J. . :"j 'j l,s:!.,. ., 4".21 ..x.... ....., --.- l'------:-+~:' '~ ' ! 'j__
"""- .!, 1. zo: ~ .'. . .. . . .. ..' '. I ,1.', . I ,1 J . ., ....
.'. "':1' t.. .." ',. ,. ,.120 ,. , . '. ,. , -' .' '.,. . , 1." . J i (r 1 ' , .i:.-" , , Q
- >"':1 s.., ',: ,;.:~i; '" r: ; j i.; > ::k 'f,. ~ " ;,i':'! i: :r~~. Ii ';1:" i T ---;' ~~/! , . .", " . ,.
- ~.:---._. .: "'~.': .: ;i; , .;; '~' ':1'.' ;!1;1; 'q. POND. j . L. t ;....' ~",,;,,-:-~'''":c..,J.. .,..: .~h .'"' ;Toe;:...! 121.- 0.! }. . !;
-'. l~. ~.---J -} 1 .JI . i ;11 'z.o:>- '/< ,~". 5l'1'. 1 ., t ! :.-,'4: .' _. .........--.'~ .j_' _ _ <...
.. -. ~ t" J. 1 ., 1/ . . . <~ '" ,',. , ." . ,,~ . . ,. 'lC"l'!1U- . I '.
'.; - ;-....... .~ "'5;/ . "?Z ' '/ Il.}. 4,/'.__-' /; ././ j '- ,11- '. ": i ". '~". '-"'.....J~t.'in.ESM'L ',7 ''';'''~'1' . '0-
". - .....-" t .' I , ." -I. {, . . . .. '" . , q-ZS. '.1. . . .~. ,e .. _
"'. ./f'~~~' . ........ }f, - ""f'. ~/,i-'-~--rJ.. 7. .... 11//7..-.., 3511.1:..' . \.' '~_: 1,_1:...6<'. ~,Hl ..'j .JmCBB01lBOOIl.' -:-.'-11 _ .~
'd'-'. I r....:<>~..... ','" _ I I I I , . - 'i~, ", " ,. .. \. .".'1<ER$, . ... . "'i I" <:IQM.\lDtaAL . Q::'
.-':..._-p ". " t---:.-i J.... ,.....:.:~-'.;"O=-.' ~ '~'f: .-' ,::7.f f., . '~H ~:--, ~. p,'i:'l. jl:'-._ .I:,-c,4'C t.. .... '_.
:, .;~IL<~;>. "~".~j...~~:.:i l~ -~ _I -~~'__~~)j5~'\ :_~K-r~::-" _ -. ,,:.,e l'~. ~.':',;~~,.;:-t;.~~'<.'-~- .:...::. - .-r-n ~ .~..:
;<,,:~11<>; -"'" ~ ..dlJ...JJI::--;-~, f:::~::~-'-~~.J i ~-,~'tff'VOO~RJ\7E' ~\.;. ~~C4'T . ~",u"~ ~_~..; . =
1~;jli~i;1~\\ >;:!~!:<:'- .--~! iP\':?:-:-~{~~<lf:F ~f if . o--'--~ ~ '-'-:'_ ~. ~ .~ - ~.~~. ~. ~ --;
d"""11 ~ {..; '\: " '"~'<". 11 ...... ., U, - ":'J '-'__DlG-!REO'-'DlIlD .
~::j~::.')J'~~~.'(,.;'~~..~I.jjQij.., -;" -X"?'.... 11 'jJ .;~, '.~" ~n.n '.:1 {"'i:. '. r.,oor,saa';' ." '., - '. ,?-. .'.
..r")!l"'i~"_ ,;.O!; ,~, ,... j11-~l.~. '';~ ,..! ,,~:: - TDr.Kl.J>fCS2lilC09tS;J.. . ." a..
'':>ij. _L:iV' I !!.o:!'P-c:.~ A-V ,l~':',' , <,\>-',:, 'J'A_ _ ,;,.." .11./6/96' ..~~ . .
,31" ."-.. ... ,~]~r:~~~~~::}::-" Jl~)~ .:' '~c~'d:jJP' ~:': J~~'. .;~jT -- ~ .. .- .;..':'("~;." . -
jll I "(:)'1, .'(, '0::"" ,{,'f'<;;~',r- . o....."-,.p..". , .,pc..... ~. ~
. '~ll _!]~!: <or -- .' :ia':', '\,,,,,1.Y -; ;'~-><ttb~:}-:.,#'~;t v - "S;
, . . ,,-, . .. .."l'.. ! ::. ,.'. ~ <..,"". . . .Q '" f'" f:(
-~:; -,' ,: tf :j~i~ -ir-. .~ (: ~:- f"Hrirl' ~
- . I. ; . ..0 . . t:> '.. . ~ ~-'-' 'Of ".
.. . .:111 .::::::.; ; ..~ j' ;.; ~;. e~~~' :<O~'.
11 'j' , :~ Z
19! !. i j ~ ~. _ i d_
1 j , I I ) , <:l: ,
;. ;1]' d _.;' ,1 -~ ,- ~_ '" 'j.
j: ._ 'I
~ l'
P
-
;-~. 5~::!:.'~"':~ ~!!~
-.----:.....-
_ _ ~ ''::''-'tr v:..:." :' -=-__
S""~E:~
.~
-'
."\
t.'-'"
,
-c-"
-.
."
.--"'
-
100
o 100
1-----.....:...
. SCAlI IN .rECT
-
-
.'
.'
,::
.m!
;..
i,
~~.~~-
"..f"
~.>
'~~.'
~~~:
; ~ - _A
...,,,~.
..
.~~~:.~
;~. :-.
, .
, -~..--
'I.:',' ,
:
~
..
.'
~
:
..
t
'.
~""':;tJ..~.
~ ~:g;.~~~
l( ""'"C" ...u.-r
. ~G...t"J..tt_
" :r.....o-,o..; >'U<.
c ~ STORn ""..Ji
.
200
'300
{tt-k. €.6::
~:.
0: ..
--'~----
.
,
; .I
,
,
~,::=~.7= :I;= -~:~/~:,~:_:
~.~. ~ ::~ '"'! oJ..:- _..:~:: 1hS:-- -:
--
GE!';~RJl..L ?LF..l~
?~_IR1'101~T. ?F..RK EF,lSlr
?I\TE, SIX, SEVEl~ # EIG3T FJ-~D
PCRTE_, F.;]:..:RR~S' -COtJ:NTY r TE)~r:;..S
.. ~-)~~-~~!
:-'t... s:::~
:':~.t.ij..
.~;;:~:~: ';:ZY" :;':-\~S
PO Iie2. fi35 '.
s.cr~. n- 7~!:.7C ~
2EL",::t-)(.71 (0'
.'" 2~.1'2~-~6t9 {~I .
m 77,a'1l0l!:s ll3i:E.~
~ '. o""":'<I~.
!..~.., DArt:- .c/l$i,8
-
~.FW:~;n<C!~,
~,.Cr:a,.TntSlet
'~I'I~ .
'~iood S.bmi!1al~I.~
~,.
~~
L_~~==-~._..:.- .....- '--- 1f
- -
-. - --:-. :-:-=---' . . . 5 7 C? ~
- - . r"'~-r'r-l ...,- ~?C 1-
~ ~'.~ '-'-'v~.-'.J' ..-- __,.~
.. -.'
""' '-!
f
~.,:","':" i:.,
!.\ 1 A'~::::. J.
I
f
i
=101< El=:
56 Lot." Blocks
36
3-7
3f
39
. .
S!:C':"I01: JaBE.: JU:StR\'Z -GO' .
(2.eS( ~..i
S!:CTIOIf $Z'n:It:
f,~ Lct"'..../C E~.
'0
'1
"
:3
~ ~:-.. ...
i~~~~ ~~7~~.~DA~.
'.socnOsIn-'E: .l!tQ9l'. Y!n ,
..,. D .
.. II.
-- 49 1e
.
..
S~JOI1 51%: ,
S2 1.0""'-&1"3 Bloc::b
. .
llU&l
..
os
.6
<-c
lB
10
18
10
~
3~
72
2.
l'
]0
24
1.
.'
z;
.<...
.~l
-'
Hi
s:
.....'
r..~i
Z'
-
J
I
1
,~ I
~ i
23 .1
~ .j
~ ,
- 'j
"'-'
< ,
':,: ,
'~"~ II
'" -.
-.< .
~X
d~1
~ >71'
_. .,
......;. 0:::..
-'
. ~ ". ,
- ~:-;
:-"'!....... U
<...-..:.~ ..;..._:1
=== ~" ~ II.
. _...:::::-
~, .......~ ......
~>< .
~;= Ii
'. ,
=--< to,... Or_., .' .
.. .....~-
z=~
CO:::. .1.
~HOI
~ :-0. .....
_ _ ""'""t
.Ht; .
<:::<1
'=.:.\r. ,.:
'~
..
!
~:
1
,
i
.-
,
'::ZI:..
-ii~
-
~/.lr
-
1<
FtET
.'
300
.
- - -- - --
.. .1
- - -"~~~~ -.:.-
57-1::~ -
r....ooD J:~ .S" ..
FlP31 !U..P ...ur lCO,.s.;J
11.1061'"
.
.'-.-;:- .- -.~ \
c..";'_ . LOCATION
MAP
579
539
~-n-os;: !l:IJI!.:
R.:.-SEPi'E "G"
I2.ES4 _
36
37
38
39
18
1&
18.
10.
I SECItQ-li.:Jili'ttL__..:..._".~~~ sttTION ."ttG"HT____
I' . I '. . .
.1. ....
'j .... . .
L ~ _ -+ _'_~~ ;--: =.~:- ~:::.~-::..,~.---= -:;_".,.___,----: ::~ -=.~.~_-=- ~_ _~_ ___ ,___ __~-- __.
f . -!.- '--. --'. ,_. ,.-. -_. -_.- -. -- -
. ~ ,- ..... . .-
. - ~//i'':'' 1." ~. -:_:-~.:- :'<~.::" J::~;;;
~;: '~{i:;;.~r:--'-:::--,.. -c \-. ':':;J - c '; - ~: .~ -. ~'"_'. ':;-:'"C;'- ~:--r ~< :_~:,~ '_.: . '~-y'- ._,
S J .' ..' ~., -' \ --=-'---L' .,. c. ,-____. . --~~--'--' "~ ~___n~ ' ~.
,~:.i__':_"~:7-~:- r~'~.(3:.~~~i:>--~c~~~~~j~ ~:" '>
, ....1 UNR.c.S,RIC..c.u ....4. ~; . ., .,. -",1, .' " ,'. ,-~ . l~ ",. ....5 -.
. 0 ~ . ...: . _:i ;, .. ~t:....";t. : . ..... ' ~ :.:. .; - - .:: -. .:!. . :. ~ .
. g '-'ESr-R\/E "i' ". ~ ".'~ 1 ;~,r:--: ~ ~~ !:a:' -"- ., t \;~, . ___ --1r" r =_."
~:~:l':: ";i~4 . ';':'. ]" ~t;": ;1 ,11,:' ~r ~~;\,'.:(' ;: .,;.,)if
>- " '.r-p=:s ,:. .;;0 I, i". ;'~ _!j'" ,.;.;' ,.,. '._
.~ t~r3.~L:~:.:...~,'l~.~t~4' S ~~:,~~~~~-=,j,i, =i,
'-' . . . ~~... - J II. . .- , I l ) I 1fT ~AI 0 Q d u .-('. i-\,"",,' . .-1
-- - '.' t' .."---:. . ~~~'-l---=---"':~~"'l
-,.... ..." l' " {.. Of"......".., :... .. .'
~. -.i ". _ I ~ __ ~_" ~ _ ;.~' ".--- _ _
. :- - - ------: .,; l' .. . r. ! I ' ,. 1i~ 1! . . "l
,~,1 ' . .~: jj;~~"l. .~~:t~ .- ' ~"o~J> "'. ;
lu i W '.i-- ~,);:' t."" '-<.">>-~ -'" .,,' ..~.:-~ ..
~ 1 ." ~:. i '. 'ri!'~ ,. '~. ~{! '4C~:'.., ~
1- . '0, 'o~' '_
: ',' .~!-..~:~ ;E i
I " -=. '-<;(, I' - -. , !O ,:U .
.], ':~, '. .~, t~r ';- ~t. - ;~~.
. . , Jl . , 'UJ , '
!h~~, ~"f~ ;i~ !gJ.,~~)E'" : :1 1.1 . :
! G) ~-'i 77.0'. {~,.:-~ t - : .I
'. ,--...,
: ~2J ~~. 6:!..~.<-io/-;
, ..
j " - - ,
.~: .,J;O JlESOBl.v ~
.~ "-'-f~---~-
- --- - - - - "
G.::;hLr:"""',.:.: P .w:':'.1~ ,
~;:7D;..::1~'7'i "C!:.7".Jl- 'r"~~rra J.
...l.._._"'.....J..........L ----.-.\. _~r___ -f;
sEcTIal.~s tI\'EJIX, SEV'E!-~. E1G::'!' Al\D l.tI-HE ".j.
~.p- ~?O~'TE r RF.o.A"C\R!S COUNTY,' T'::)J~S ft
~:!'.'rf~~:-i~f~' Z:'ay. :-O-"'-:~e '(~,,"':" b,. ,;;"".;....~ ll~, . t
"., - -,. "-.-. . '1 --- f.
-'#!..' ...:"1.;.., .... . _4'" . l<f.i.'" '. l.T~\ 1 ru"lft :
.;~~::~~~:?~r~;;~~~:_~~..~.~~~~~::~!hr.'........;.:~.{ .'
. - . i f:
\ r
_.~ i--- 'r;
I"
t 'f
. (. I
,. :-:. f:.'.
. ~
~
t': .
~
~.
J
.~ ~l
~ ;.,.;j
~l
....,
.;;aj
, ~I
., r:al
'~
-01'
.
-
..
.- .....
~:'.~~!
.......
.--....
. ~
ii'" '
~<,
':;P"::
t.,:",
~;.:t"~
~~:~~_.. L.'
f.-'::-.,
"' ~,-
,.
"
..
.
-
;,
-
-
---'
.'
-
.
, ,
.
,:;L.:-
-.-,--'
.;- .,~'- -
... _~'IoI"'.'
...."., .
.~..\_J
"' :,-:t:
......'
.'
'-
",
.
-
"
.
--
--
_oj
,
"f
r
1
j~
i
j
:i..
I
.-
00
.'
~ ~~.. ~ ~~;;~~~ ...:: ~ii~~:r:
:2' ,. .::~~!.::,:..-:: ~5:.Z3.
~ 1\ :7.t!",;!":: . ~~_~:.
:.4. f. :-~.I;e-5.- t ~i..c:r
. ~ '" :2r:lS."t'" r ,.,.- ~....
~ ;. :::-4~~ ;. ~~~~..
..."": i. ~::-:;:-X".! ;6f~".'
;.! "'-~3f-:.;'" :: 27.~!:'
-
"
100
200
Lbi~
',:- ..
g,
. Jf.
.
"
It- .".
.
'-.
~-:~......... tsv:.
iLi~L~:~ ;",q..!,
.....~\IlIl..t..~
~_?"':...
=ro~-._:-,,_".
.:r"'aJ~\::1";: M.r..
~
:t~;:~>~ ~~; ;1~'-~'~~,
:. ~.'::
=. C:~-
~<
:e
__ ..:::~!!:1:~~~-...e~
_i~~,~~~~::~::
",::~
~~
~
:';--
t.
Y.
::
~
~ .
l!
'"
'"
::0
S!:C:"IX E1GET':
;(, Lq:.s/C, . Blocks
$Et:'!'tD5 SZ'\-nt:
foe l.c:.~!.c Blodc.s
, Z
!:A..~1"-:~ z ~
SB~~ n~: Sn:. S~'"E!.. E!1Z"1' 'lJ'~ X-:J;! s'
2 nsE!lVES/2"~ :LC'1S!lS ELOCU/i'. Ji. AO'~ ::I
-:-', 'sf.cnasR''E: ~ ". ~,
47 n
. . ' 48 '. 18
.., :!G.
S=ICJl S:rx,' lli.= =
22 -l.o::.a/) aloeks .U ~3S
'.cS. 24:
" 25
f'
~~
19.
l~
2'
15
;;:i~~;2=~
-:=-::::-= ._~-_. -:-:- ' ~""
. '.' -'..;:- .
. ~"" .
. --
. . h'
~~ - '':.
/' ~ -~~' ~..- .
p. - .
~ :~' t. ':~ f~ ~..
--cr. ~ !
- i
. . e
U' _
~ z
. "'$ ~.
- B
"
".=
- -=--~,..
0&
U
42
'3
.
,
;C!.
I
(
i
-
.
.IO! NO.
.GPl
-
w~.
.....
......
.w.
~ m :.J.~
(Z'. ~ :;:
'-.. ~ %t:'
'0::' ~:>~~
',n- :,:.. i
eLLJC)< Zt:z
;''''Zx 2"0
I' .... W' ~ ." ~
'Z -... "'.<<g
1_ >-w- :~g
~~ I.,.=:.
" .... 0 ur
Z >c:: Cl.:
UJo:~ a;
- .~< ~
1-. CI),.J ~
. . c::
(f) ..,.
<( 0: :j
o 1f)&IJ
Z a:
(J Xt-
<0 a:
", 'CD C3
lL 0 .
~ Q:J!
::> ~-~
Cl ~',<:"'"
/ ...,. ",,,
~
," -
.
,
'.
.-:.:.-....'..........
-
--:-..:-~._----:-
-.
,
'-
..-.......,
- .
r,
1~
-- -- .~
'~S', -
SECTION
:'::WC.:JIl."':'r .cn.6.~9a
:- '; . ] Co AOU;S JJU: (~l:.'-"
Q&".!..../ur..."&..'n~~ .
--.-
SEVEN
-'
.--
.-
=: I
Z I
;::; I
.~ 'I'
= .~
t: t:: J
~5' I"~
~21
...:-;
z'
3:.; I
~~ '11
'.'. ....c..
~ x-'"
. '-'
t:: '-: . I
,.-.'--. .,.,
3~-~ I
...c;:: .
...... -r_. I'Ot"
5?>Z
~H=
~~.
. , ,
:-. t;j t:J,
;Z; Z ;.;'
0.1"""\.;,...
'-' '-
::E;;-.;O
~~~
:-'Jt)
'::=1::'-'::::
'r:.; tOr?-.
"
--.,
Z
.
.
FAIRMONT PARK EAST, SECTION 8
FINAL PLAT
EXHIBITS
1. STAFF REPORT
2. VICINITY MAP
3. FINAL PLAT
.
.
Staff Report
Fairmont Park East, Section Eight
Final Plat
September 21, 2000
Requested By: Eddie V. Gray, Trustee
Requested For: A 12.4793 Acre Tract out of the William M. Jones Survey,
Abstract No. 482, Harris County, Texas and being a part of a
266.154 Acre Tract described in Film Code 184-69-2052 in the
Office of the County Clerk of Harris County, Texas.
Present Zoning: High Density Residential (R-3)
General Commercial (GC)
Requested Use: Single-family dwelling
Background: Fairmont Park East is a residential subdivision located north of
Fairmont Parkway and west of Driftwood Drive (Exhibit A). The
General Plan for Fairmont Park East, Sections Five, Six,
Seven, Eight and Nine on the east of Driftwood Drive, was
approved by the Commission on April 16, 1998. The
Commission during their August 17, 2000 meeting
conditionally approved the Preliminary Plat for Section Eight.
One of the conditions is an amendment to the General Plan of
Fairmont Park East Section Five thru Eight prior to the
approval of the Final Plat for Section Eight. Item VII of this
agenda reviews the amended General Plan.
Analysis:
Staff, using Development Ordinance 1444, Section 4.04 and
Appendix '0' as a guide, has reviewed Fairmont Park East
Section Eight Final Plat and found it to be substantial
compliance with applicable Ordinance requirements.
Section 5.02 of the Development Ordinance empowers the
Commission to require pedestrian sidewalks when it feels their
inclusion will serve the public interest. Staff would recommend
the inclusion of sidewalks within the subdivision. Responsibility
for construction of the sidewalks should be specified by
covenant.
As proposed, Section Eight has 4 blocks and 56 lots (Exhibit B),
equals 4.4 dwelling units per acre, conforms to the City's Code
of Ordinances. A density of about four dwelling units per acre
also conforms to the intents of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
.
Fainnont Park East, Section Eight
Final Plat
P&Z (9/21/00)
Page 2 of 2
.
The proposed subdivision will be located in park zone six. The
City's Development Ordinance prohibits the dedication of
parkland less than one acre in size; therefore, money in lieu of
parkland would be required.
The covenants for Section Eight have been reviewed by the
City Attorney's office and found to satisfy ordinance
requirements. Paving, drainage, and utility construction plans
have been reviewed and approved by Staff.
Conclusion I Recommendation:
There are still outstanding issues with regard to the
Amended General Plan for Fairmont Park East, Sections
Five through Eight. None of these issues directly affect the
layout of Section Eight. Staff suggests the Planning and
Zoning Commission consider approval of the Fairmont Park
East Section Eight Final Plat subject to fulfilling all conditions
of the prelim inary plat approval with the exception of the
Amended General Plan. Staff recommends that the City and
Developer continue to work to resolve the issues with the
Amended General Plan and that an Amended General Plan
be finalized and approved by the City prior to the recordation
of the Final Plat for Section Eight. Additionally, staff has
listed other items that will need to be addressed prior to the
recordation of the Final Plat.
1. All construction improvements are complete at site.
2. Payment of $419.89 shall be made to the City for street
sign installation.
3. Payment of $6,663.68 for street lighting cost shall be
made to the City.
4. Payment of $9,800.00 is made to the City in lieu of
parkland dedication.
....,..
\
I
t
,
.
t
~
JAMES.... ~J1..IU'.u.
TEXAS~NQ. '40
s_
":'~"~rnL..t""JOI.
.
a..-
.~
..':)8 tile.
.LM..'-a w.~1L.~"" f:Ic ~cf_ S:cc ;:51_';;ac:tice_ ..
~~mrd~ck"~~__~~'=acrD*ftaW...
. ~tIIfIItIi~.........__':~ ~ ~"-,,Mll:l.poiawu
o.nrr:__~ al'wIt~~..s..T' ir.:G~_ irGa.. ~f)Ofiltcboi!l~
_ e.:.- ~ --.:~~..- nquira:c:Io lI.\~ &_~ o!LiIPon=:
.~~. ..-
l.J~;' ,,'-G~~ .r.~~It.:~of1beS:z:kdT_lo;ncbce.
:JIti"'~:$c:(~_iIaa.:r~1bI::t:tc:~~lSeue_.CDTa::Ian1C. ..
~~~ru-.~~~~CT.~.~~t!.:p....
- ~ .
.-
-
.-
f.~.
~\:~y.11<"JSYU
T~;,-~~ ..~EDD:.7 \ <m...."y.71!.:."S;a...".~,o~e:!b;~t.ff~..'i.jC
~k' r~'" Jo,rJtI;.L-,ST. Sb:'Th")SlJCrl{;.IIt~~e.e~hJrvCi:} .'
""'*~~~iInc1~il.i..s;.f:::.c.~'C"~or~ .
~. Ta.aocrs.:. ~~. bwsa::W...;::IIlia=::xrict=a,orptl:.o1sait:
..rc'~X'I.~ t ~!>:n::Oar:Jf~:'r.: c::....!Ja:w.1;(<<=Ot-~ ~~
O:~ !::6~..HlO ~ ___shaf ii::-'AlG<<1I_'rQ:<<'.x.:~C!':"_ a:1W
~~oflba!~.::Im!. .
A TTJ-.:sI
~!>.- .:
S-c::JLrtARY. U. P'O~rr ~~"""~
^--.q.Z~C(M"~~ .
A..-nsT
""- -
l.;.. ?(n(l"i em' p.:-.,s"',,::a:-
&<. .
. oua:nOil.L4 Klitn:'j.L"'_~~GVEP.~n.iE)o"
BY'
rn:"1R\.("'-'.LAf'o~~f P-...."--..~~ii
.-4.~~~c:C').~-cSSJ(nI.
. -
c:..ru.. 0;: 'tHE .t'.,,:...~-:!{.O'.."P...:
J.:~(~.!".;cat'
:==:=~~;~~T~~~:.~STS:~~~~i~?:=~r~~
a:.'!x~~ar:i.r"::,.fur~~-
tl-~~~z...r.;;:'~,C>>A-:'c~=.,",:-1'''~.;r.;..,.-~;.! 0.::. :" ._,-~.......t
.
SritET HUM!CR
FIX_U
PL.\.T
1~
-'
'.
J-'---... ..--c
. :::.:.._"...~_. ............:
. -----
II ~ u j~1~~[~~1.!~~~~
II. ~.._.=.==".
!
~
1\
U. "
ft -
it ,.
Ii
.1
I, .
ti'
If'
t
H
~;I
.'
I .
-
-.
.....'-.-: --
'_ -' ::~:[:-.",. ,:,,~__:'~SJ-
iAx;;"',' F:_~~;.-': :.::~.
'-J: '~':;'~ I:AJRIVO'OD "RJ'Fr" ~ .....y, . ~ ' :'!;gi . .,,;,,~-x; . $?PUCE DRiVE NORTH -Xi>--< '-. wi./ - "7.' "!.oJ . .'
~'" ".; I;:' ,: ",f' }~.U~~~:-<,_. -:-~i~:~.;.:' ::-'~k::'\;~:~.;,;ri:-_'~:,.. ,:;..~r.. t :C~_~o=~:'~i;~~ !~~~.~~-., ~'; ~_ - -,
.~. ~ :::::::"""~.l! i" ~"'t . 1,~..._~"""""~'" .,('/ -,'. .,-" .....~~ .Z...'......
'~t . ..:~;--;-.~~>!.~i'..': ki!; .11)' ~.,:~. <0 !~.,.~ ~..~1.~f.tc+ ~.~ ~:~: .'~ .~::i ll)''-_~'t..::-~~ t(>' :~!~1 ': ,';''<"'',-< ~g' -.
" .' ',y' -. ~~ . Ii) . ...!; s .:;...... . .';'.' .,i;.~ -:.: It". ..;:'It ~ 10 .8. 0 r,w, .. ......r --,. - .;;..g> S ~. . 'It " ' .1-:.
-11,: .'~~: .~~;~~; ;~: t;J. .~>,~~~.~~.< tL ~.:~. '~~.,,'~',r~(=:~~'I;~;..'''~~l;~; _'~ ..~V:"~;l/ ~.~.~. .~~~-.~;;~ .~' .~~! "':~':./~'.~~-:. ", .
':..:~..t;~ pt~l<)l "=t...:~ o'~;-'a' '''i i:~~ k~ C ~~21 lJ) Gi..~~.;;::: "=t ~!i[J~: ~ f';::~./' ..:;~O), '. .~~c 0 ~f~: U) Gc.~k .~ .... '.~
~e ~~'. ~: '''O.~i' ~ .':Y' ~ tr -- :".~.~. j.~;-, a"~~i. ~~j -~~ 1f~":-~ ~~t~' "~~".f7f-r ~ ..,~, O-:'~~! -,.~ '.;;- ~, T~i~ .:~ ~~.Ff:- ~~. f' - ~. ~ ~_ .~~
::;'.. 0'1')...1.... .... ~,. I")U ~ tQ.;:-"'~:::' ~l. 10... '''''" It) . ,. c~' I') .~.U.OJ '<':::"_ '_lO .l:.....!.. <:( '-". .- _. -~. .2.
~i, JY~ ~ .:1~l'iij,~~~~~il~",~~~~'!'lfr.~'t.l~-i\ijti/E ~~~ :~ .:i tf:.::~L~ "1: ~~.~ ~-
'J - a', ... ~a. - . 0 ';'0 e e" OJ ",<.. .1\ ::l ".." 0 .~- 0 :fl!. to.
~,~ ~ ;+~~:f5~t~~~,,,~_;~d:~~~..: t~~_~~~:~~~.;?;:! ;:gL~.;.~Ji;;?;~ ~~;~,~;-~' ~~_i .)~".[~/=f' "
_ _ . ' ~ pR1FTWOOD: DRIVE._ . (80 . R. O. w.) . .., ~ ._ '.' "' !!''ffi~ - j ,Co .
, ~.~., t.~ .,' ~ .. ;' c '~:;~!;~!:i~' ::;....;c 't=/:"'\0 .~: c<':'~ ~ ~.' '.. '.~ . !t :. - '~, =~.~~i"'.
. ~ ::. -'. o' . ~ ,. l'lO"l~..._.
It. ~ ~.
~ ~. ., :l( - 2:
=_ ~"or( tt
-'0 " .~
F","'R..~Qt..;PAJtKf..~ FAIR..~"O,..-rPARKEAST i::
S-c..~~ S::~4oC f'~~RMO!'orJ?A.JU:.E.".:ST
s:cnot< 4C .
:
... L
,
--
r~~O z':~_~.-s.
'::H...'i !-.~J...;' &-,:;~'lC"~~).
; ~::;;'"r;
-"-(!7E ~.:s P.;;2O""P'-~ f~I:.i_:-::E!)
}.--:-:!.:
s::!'1': ::;'\~~l~i .
;'~':~:'~~!:-:;'-:':::"l: !Sj
's:T..-;.:-!..2: ":"t' z.:= trr
~ :-:::.1.':' .!:......-;~ .
'.
.
"
-
. .
n:.,.~ t;I..s.=-~?:!CS'
~~~=;~~.~. ';:;.~~~~~.c~~ ~~~..=.~~~
J...~M..1.H 1'_""'X!: :-...:..-::- :."!::'O"'..:-~ I:: r:.:Y ~1' :'fo".'I~:Z:-~ :1I:-:n
:~:~:~-: .:~:<=~:= ~~::=:.::~ ;;:~: .=_' ~.=i.
....;.~ ;:>e"'~~..l;:"....:;' ;..= -:"0_ s.~~.=-.:.;=":.~! v.Y ~.:.:-':" t~ ~e~i: .
;':';~".!,. .:'::":1.'!:lC': ::.:..~~": ~ _.-y. &=C. c~ ~~.:..."'I.t..'bc:':"P.~ .
~=~;~~~~:~:.;.:~:: ~..c.:i.=iw:.:.:. ~~.~~~ c:~:.. r:..:.z
':"5:~:7 :.~':"""~':boa::.y.~;'ct;..tn.o &.1-. ~ 4$:: J.t..DIl ~ ...-.;.cl
~~;,t~:~~~;.;~'~~ ~~~~~72~:'
!:..:.-::~::. . ~': .... ...-......
.~"":Z eo:.-=...-...:..:.:a::; s::~:....:.c"r a.:.: 5C.:' ;Ei.,:'~4 ..=-:.'::";~ a
C:.:;~~;c ~ :..::.!,: .t; f_.~ ':;..:. ~:..:..='t. :fc=- u~='~:.:.t=' '-:J.,#., .;i.=:":::_s,:
=~~. ~~~::fr~:;~"'~:;:~:~;:;..~::e~~~l:r.~
: Lcrsz.-i-:;!:.. 9{~'''!Z .'
:=.;..:-:~,-...:.:~~s.'
EJ.,,~~?!.' ;.~'L.'E Cp.-:F_'
-'
--
.
~ .IES"'!cS.6j.l[. ~r:c,;, ~.. s.c-:~ ~~ ~. 7&.:.:=;...~ .a=i& z...s-::
~t...:.=- s...-c&o _ c';'''~=-CM ~ !.;,t.-~ S-*' ~ u.a 1i:;::"::; ~~
~~~~ ,;: .::.~~ c~~~~ S;;~::~~~~~~~.' ~:;: t..r~
.' . .
- .
~~~:=:.: ::i ~~:;~~~s~~'~~:ci~~~~~ ~~::'::C'
p::::.t:.':;. i: ~ !.&,..= =~;a::-:. ci:r --1' :..:....... ~ &&:..c: ='-=:'-~:'-r--"":' 'D:.:.'\oe;
. . . .
:::-ECI1'::z:. ,":3"'t'.~..S. &.2.:::.:; ~ :t.a..~ .r.:.~': c!!. ...-y ~.:.Le c: ::%":..!~
. =:~:..:.~~ ~ i:~~;~~a::: .~~~~ ~-;::~~ ~ .
.=-~~:~; ~~~~~;...=i~..~_;.=_-:':-';.~-O:. ~-==;:z;
-.
.\".
.;:.
ii~. .
C"
\ol
-t)
~ ..
.Ii:
Il.'
Ul
FAIRMCt!\i piRK EAST
:;<...--nos 3
-
'.
T~25.'CE!'rO~ t=:;MC~ ~~~~(O~~.e.crn' of1..zi3fX., -;=u.-6~.~.
:b>>1oIS.~~~ l;:":mJtT...-tior.P-:a>>o5f'~~"';t' P~~.SEr:i'" EGH'i
!L<Gm!.~ wd ec t.d:t~ ~ti:.t C~ e!1.a PaDt L"": ~:)r :a-<<=~ ~:L"l
1t.C...,(~~~C~r...CI!'.Ydln":=~~'-ol .~_
,-
1:' 6. TD ~ IfOl'TT' P A TI"" =-Q ^S"""'l
.1. .L :...1_1. \..l \ ...l.. ~ '(. 1.. J.. A...... ~~ \- J-...L~
- .... .....
. SECTION.EIGHT-
CrTY 0 F LA PO RTE. .
. . .
~- , "-"RT<; CO L.....'Ty~ -rE-';- A S
r-i....-"...K.i._ . .:_'. -1" -_\-"""1...
. . -
~rCTlO"'~ riGHT .
. 5f ~NS .
. .
-.' ";Bloc;:i.
_'::'-=-~~.~3.s-l.'-;'.:::1'SF
. i':.~~93 A~re:;
;~~:, ,~:~..~:~:
? (.. E:-:-. ~:.~. .
!..zF:"A":"... 7X ;:':::00.
t~~~.:..;~~~~~~. &~;~
-
,-
-
-,
,
-
s.t.........___.._'l'T"'"' .~.l".;;"'..:..........;.;---............. I
I t..-~.....~-~,~...~-. 1\ .
~. . ,..,-, ..' r r-, . '\ .
.."., . :'~~~.t '-:~:;~--=-j: V.~ ~,
" :~::c--F---~=~;_., .: - g% I ~ J.: .-_
. . . .~._~-,c "LO...........dC'iJ~ ~/:~? ;)';'.' ~ ...~
. .__'. 4_
.-
ii~i~~~~~;' ~ .,
'1Ill:'ID'"C'~z::;~~...._._~~'''i.T.a''nL.'"'ll!!':--~:o::~CSX'';'-r-~ti" I . -
_~..., ~~:CSl........~a:~:a::U-.::r..=.: i7. ~j- :w...t:'''~:a-3i c!:at
ao.z:'a:z"'-=:o:r:~.:\:Jl:'I=c"'~"tIP:;:.'~.u.cc:J'~~w.::::~ z=a:1lIr.: JCrC:'T;:."~1:l..'..z:,:!. _ 4
.~~~...:;~~~~ ~x:n-.:mt"---..et'\Z\:x:o:!:'I.:'K.or~ . --. ,~. ro.. .
!~=-.;,."...,;""""~-:-=~c~.~..:-~tt=~""'.;,,-=,,~~-"';:,,,~.",":' ~ ~ .~ g ,
,;:;.."......:...,....,~.,.~im"""""~K - . ~: i::.l~ ~.! t
1!-r:"CIo;:::!o.a..~~cr=::w-:r-~~r~~...::u:t~ t"M;.~~f.~'S I.:=:"'''"J.3c:~a t Z :f;:. c. is
-=:~s~~::-i~€~i::::~.~~::~I;.~ '. ~ ~~~;
~_.r<"".z:,:~#b--. . ~ _.a_ . . ~~~t~~il
.'. r..^mNL~.r.DC~.~~z:;~'at"~a=f~~::".a;os:.!ltoc~. W Z ~ i= ~. E :
.:ts-=..~._~sM\.:'ld:.~fIc....-....e~~~r~~.:xd'~ICt:;r..: Z -~ f= <: en
f'FOM~!l:X'c.~C..nAlknul['~.c.a::e~ ...~'. _ >-. .:w" ? .
_ " - _ - t.: t
1S~OO'L~~'~~.=\" Gl'....".::l<l:5T;'L_-"---"lci C) LiJ:: t
. - . '-';>_~_'. '.' . ' Z > c . . ·
", '.' 1:Jo:~ ~
:i ; ~
. ::::<;--
i- en"-J c:
C/). ci
. - -:0
~o' ;";...J
O c=...J
z,,",w
(.) _x e:
'-Ocr
m<l:
LL.. 0 C>
..J . c: ?t 'II:
;:) CI)
C) ~
<(
-:;;
.SEfO~~_.-.z::;;.~~.<<::u~"'~')o~~cr:JZ"-Uf,.,,!,. -
n.CSlE:..bi.7-.,"._;::-*~ ~-..=r:! 1I!b.=i~t"".,. kJrerXlif ~":
-d~.....-::a::zk~_~f(tf'b.r..qc:~a:o.::~.~W1
-.- ".
. .
.Gi~..k~-~~~o!~~~~'of.-= ..~
~ s;......
... -. . ...
""'~~~
~.c~~~.
~
CDlE ". OJi..U. ~~~
S1An'0!::'m~ k
C~~~"TYOFa~ .-..
~
-
.
.
PARK FOREST APARTMENTS
GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #SCUOO-OOl
EXHIBITS
1. STAFF REPORT
, 2. LOCATION MAP
3. GENERAL PLAN
4. SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
.
.
StatT Report
September 21, 2000
Park Forest Apartments
General Plan
And
Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU 00-001
Request:
Requested By:
Requested For:
Present Zonina::
Requested Use:
Bacqround:
Analysis:
Approval of General Plan for 107 acre tract and Special Conditional Use
Permit for 16.2 acre tract.
Mr. Edward Dutko, General Partner, Forest Holdings Ltd., L.L.P.
A 107 acre tract out of the W. P. Harris Swvey, A-30, La Porte, Harris
County, Texas (Exhibit A). This property is further described as being
located in the 1200 Block of McCabe Road. The project is identified as the
Park Forest Apartments.
Neighborhood Commercial (NC), Planned Unit Development (PUD), and
Low Density Residential (R-l)
Multi-Family Residential
This property is located at the southwest comer of SH 146 and McCabe
Road. It is bounded on the east by Shady River Subdivision and on the south
by Shoreacres. Mr. Ed Dutko made a presentation of his proposed General
Plan to the Planning and Zoning Commission on August 19, 1999. This
General Plan, which was a modification from previous development
submittals, demonstrated that 75.7 of the 107 acres would need to be
preserved based on a permit he received from the US Army Corps of
Engineers. ,The permit states that a Conservation Easement will need to be
established that will preserve the 75.7 acres in perpetuity. In addition, the
permit states that noxious plant species such as Chinese tallow, cattail, and
willow will be controlled for a period of 5 years. The remaining developable
acreage shows 28.5 acres as high-density residential and 1.35 acres as a
commercial comer (Exhibit B). The Commission was receptive to this plan
, and suggested Mr. Dutko proceed with formal submittals for Phase 1 which
is approximately 16 acres in the existing PUD zoning district.
Development in a PUD zoning district requires ,that a General Plan (for the
entire proposed project) and a Special Conditional Use Permit (SCUP) (for
the initial phase of development) be submitted and processed
simultaneously. Upon approval of the General Plan and SCUP the applicant
would be authorized to submit a Major Development Site Plan. This Site
Plan would be reviewed and acted upon by the Commission. Approval of
the Site Plan would allow the applicant to submit building plans for review
and then to begin construction of the project.
Section 106-659 of the Code of Ordinances establishes the following criteria
for review of development projects within a PUD zoning district:
Park Forest Apts. , Phase I
SCUOO-OO 1
September 21,2000
Page 2 of 3
.
.
. Uses - Review of the City's adopted Land Use Plan indicates this 107
acre area was envisioned as developing as low density residential with a
small corner for commercial uses. Although the Forest Park Apartments
is not considered to be low density residential, if you take into
consideration the 75.7 acre Conservation Easement, the overall 107 acre
tract yields dwelling units per acre that is comparable to low density
residential. The proposed high-density residential use should not be
detrimental to the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties. With
the 75.7 acre Conservation Easement, this development will be well
buffered. During review of the site plan, staff and the Commission
should look for sufficient open space, adequate parking, and a good mix
of recreational amenities. With regard to the commercial area, the
proposed commercial corner is an ideal location for a convenience type
activity.
. Streets - Being located at the corner of SH 146 and McCabe Road
provides more than adequate accessibility into and out of this site.
Access into Phase 1 and Phase 2 of this development will be provided by
a private drive that is shown on the General Plan. At the south boundary
of this General Plan . the developer has shown a road right-of-way to
serve existing lots in the City of Shoreacres. Although the road will need
to be constructed at some time in the future, it should not fall under the
maintenance responsibility of La Porte.
. Topography - this area is relatively flat and stable and should not be an
obstacle to this type of development.
. Density - staff utilized the Land Use Plan as a guide. With the
designated land use as Low Density Residential and applying a
development ratio of 4.8 units per acre (Section 106-333) to 107 acres,
this property may have, at one time, yielded approximately 514 dwelling
units. This current plan designates only 26 acres to be developed as
residential. If we applied a density of 19.7 units per acre, this would
yield the same number of total dwelling units. This density is
considerably less than the 27 units per acre allowed in R-3 zoning
districts. Other examples of multi-family residential projects are the
Fairmont Oaks Apts. that has a density of approximately 16 units per
acre and the Plaza at San Jacinto Park on Luella Blvd. that has a density
of 24 units per acre.
. Utilities - there are sufficient water distribution facilities along McCabe
Road to supply potable water and fIre protection to this proposed project.
Provisions will have to be made to ensure that sufficient utility
extensions can be made to serve Phase 2. Sanitary sewer service is not
readily available to this site. There is a sewer force main located along
the south line of this property that transports sewer to the Gulf Coast
Waste Disposal Authority plant. A tie-in can be made to this force main
but the City will need to make improvements to a nearby lift station in
order to accommodate the additional flow from this project. The City
has anticipated upgrading this lift station and funds are budgeted to
.
.
.
Park Forest Apts. , Phase I
SCUOO..oO 1
September 21,2000
Page 3 of3
accomplish this. The applicant, through a Sewer Service Agreement,
should commit to paying for the lift station improvements needed to
provide sewer service to his project and be responsible for the on-site
improvements needed to serve this project. The City has prepared a plan
for providing sewer service to unserved areas of southeast La Porte. The
plan calls for a regional lift station to be constructed in, the vicinity of
McCabe Road and Taylor Bayou. This General Plan should show a 50'
x 50' lift station site adjacent to McCabe Road and Taylor Bayou. The
dedication of this site may be negotiated in the Sewer Service
Agreement.
. Drainage - this property lies within the Taylor Bayou watershed. There
are not sufficient channel improvements ta directly receive stann water
runoff from this project. The simplest solution would be for the
applicant to provide stonn water detention within his project.
Recommendation: Based on items discussed under Analysis, staff recommends approval of the
General Plan covering 107 acres and the Special Conditional Use Pennit
covering 16.2 acres with the following conditions:
1. The overall density of the project (phases 1 and 2) shall not exceed
19.7 dwelling units per acre.
2. The applicant shall enter into Sewer Service Agreement and commit
to paying for lift station upgrades related ta this development project.
3. This action in no way commits the City to any maintenance
responsibilities for the 75.7 acre Conservation Easement.
A recommendation from the Commission on this Special Conditional Use
Pennit will be forwarded to City Council for final consideration. If approved
, by Council, the applicant would be authorized to proceed with submittal of a
Major Development Site Plan for Phase One. The Phase Two development
as proposed, will require the applicant to request a zone change from the
current R-1 to PUD and then submit an application for a Special Conditional
Use Permit. Approval of Phase 1 in no way demonstrates any level of
approval for the future Phase 2.
.
.
City of La Porte
Special Conditional Use Pennit
Pennit # SCU #00-001
This pennit Is issued to:
Eddie Dutko
Owner or Agent
444 E. Medical Center Blvd., #616, Webster, TX
Address
For Development of:
Park Forest Apartments Subdivision
Development Name
1200 Block of McCabe Road, La Porte, TX
Address
Legal Description:
16.21 Acre Tract out ofW.P. Harris Survey, Abstract A-30
Harris County, TX
Planned Unit DeVelopment
Zoning:
Penn It Conditions:
1. The overall density of the project (Phases 1 and 2) shall not exceed 19.7 dwelling
units per acre.
2. The applicant shall enter Into a Sewer Service Agreement and commit to paying
for 11ft station upgrades relating to the development project.
3. This action in no way commits the City to any maintenance responsibilities for
the 76.7 acre Conservation Easement.
4. Access shall be provided by way of a private street or driveway.
Failure to begin construction within one (1) year after issuance or as scheduled under the
terms of a special conditional use permit shall void the permit as approved, except upon an
extension of time granted after application to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
If construction is terminated after the completion of any stage and there is ample evidence that
further development Is not contemplated the ordinance establishing such special conditional
use permit may be rescinded by the City Council, upon its own motion or upon the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of La Porte, and the
previous zoning of the entire tract shall be in full effect on the portion which is undeveloped.
cqf1h&, 1Ii/li! /OIlIW()
I Secretary ( ('
EXHIBIT F
~r:.'e:7~."'~ l:;~ ',.:rr----Jy... . ..:---'-
, '0. ',"-"'1'. I""" _. ,,'.... t-:::s...--. /: I
.: ;,..;::....~'J ~~?~#"~~~~.y~ "." H ,
.. )I.~.- L ~.,ln:1:. ..."!-~. ~.!"r I .
~ t - - 1 1 ~. 1 f.H It ;.t.::,~.~... t.. 1 .
f': ~ :n,t'L...~!.;:~~~~it; S~:rE':
. 5 Ji,. .~' . _,.~__,.. . '....
i t> t I" ,;.,".-- f I
~: ..)j ~ j F:~i-.;-.;~";I "'-',' u,. t
. '-' t .. "--r . ~"- j\
'f Ii = :;~J.' k-~.;." I i
, '1'" fit F L,:."';'-" ~'.~-_\' . f
'i ;-- ~~."k...J..." ;
k=;~~, pJ~V~;';""l_~' 1 ~.,.,
~. -It". . \7;~.ft'"(".-c'.g~\", f
"N ~ .t,."~.:"'~~I' '"'
~ ~~l':-'~'-"~~_'~~':~~~'~,r..~~-:.~~,! :, 1\ "." .
t v. f/ .t~,.::-.:tz~.',\,J'.=~~~~.....;'.
~-\:'~i~~,~~-:~~ .~:~, ;:;-;; _
1 --.. .i ~-:. I .~; :";2: .;.. "':"Fi..~,.,11
1 . ~t~~:~- ~- ~~~s.~::.:"""'.. ~.:~~~., .
I: S\l~~~~.,,~
I.. ",-t,1 .' !.'~~~ - -
~'~~:'~'! :--~! '~~-. '~'"'9"-!- ~~~;,,'
r 1/: -'-. " i jg"';' <. ,: ; '. ~
LZ''!/" \1(\, .~- .;-=--~~- . ~ - ~.
.p~;~ ~/: '~~1~-.z ~';J
i'-. -. '. tit' .: I !,-"'" ~
r"~f ~. . r: ,'. ';-.o,~::~_~~
~ ~ LO:ATIDr~ MAP, . ].
'~uUNI:S: .
~~oot> COI,f"'o!U<Cl<U.
JIroLTI-f: A1OflL\' DP'U.o!MI:!<. . .
'. ll<.~cr DDOlI1'nO~
. -WT1.IlLClCK-1 A; LOT.I. r.!.~~'
FRO~.
2Ir .'
28"
SIDE
ltr
~
.~~ ar..a.2&.',c'-.c.A::u. 2'S.C:' _'~- CC'.zir~~.QE A:a
:J:.L::- ~ ....~.u:: ~ ~ G:J:' O'!" TEE ~.P. PIaC.S ~...._ -
. ~~ lID' ll-:S:-, .~ -c:I:::E:':. ~ .~
. .
~ a1: t'.iwt ~~ C! 1:.JIr"i, ~ ~1..t! -,-:.a..:.-
.~ a....c.. a ~'':. ~:. .t -ro. .-:f ~ Lu~l,. ~~ g ~
~;..u...'" ._~ a.:r, ~~::-~. . .'
. .-
~ 1Ift~.~!"..~ ':M s...Ul.-~~ ~ ~:..:.- Co:! ~ --
___..a ~ ~ 2.::'l.!.!I- :'_~ '= u.e P':"'=- ~.s.v~5-'d ~
ZI.4";.. ~ =-= ~:az- ~ ...u. ~ _~ ~
s.~.~~CfIt":'-E~~.:~_
. -...
"'rEi:M::r ~-..u.....~.--..f &"ClC~ .ar'.H'C!"~..a..l-.
~~:: =:r ~.c:. ~.~.'~ .c::..~d CO.~
- ". " - ,..,
~ s:-,c..u....._ c..-........ ~ ~.1)0 ~-:... ~ ..c. -=.."
~: ;:~.:..-.:_....;.. -<- ~ -'
%~ :i,a'6CO.OO~. ___.cbo.:d ~'~""'3.!.-z.. iQ'7."J.
~t:.. . ~~ ~ "'.IJC ~_t _ .. ~..LC.rid:. . ~ 'Z:O tae
..~~~;" - .
t~_~u.&~~~'~~~
~ ~ ~..._s:.':"'l)I;'n".. ,6!:i.112 "~.'. ~ ~ n~'.sz.
.1...:.. ~ ..~,:.'~ _~ -..-.i.
. .
. 'ftIEr.:Z. .u . '5ac'"'-a.a.-=;... ~. az-.4 .. ~ ..... ra4.;i...
~u ~.DO f_:.. .:...... ~.a-.n CrH-..... :tu.":2~. <&
-~-"J:U.D!..f_t;_u...':l.;" - - - -...
.. .
~~ ~'u.... . ~.~ ~....,.-~~~ _~.,..:.a:: ~ _'~_'
-..c; ..".' .
..sa.:::z......~~i~......:-.:. ~_-cb. ~
___ ~ u 500._~_:.. ~ ~ ~ ~.oc....
"~~.a ~~. ...~.. .~.e'~'".~:, ~ ~:"
. . .
...~ 'Ur;D...e...- : ~ ~~.~ S!.::.,.~~ ~ ~
~~:..
"
.-.....-
. . "
~ la"'2c.u.... '!' cr__ gf_~.ee ~'tc.. ~ ~
~.~/,:~'~~'.' ~ '.,<"" ,." ,'.. . ....... -.'~.
~~ siaru..as.... . ~....,. C:R_06.~ ..... ~
--..c; . .
. ~ 1I2r'Z2 'N,,- pc:a1.1&1,__ 1:!Mo ....=-cl,.,~ -.4 ~ .!.a.e ~..
..s...-.J..,.Dd ~.1.5Zo.__ 1:-.1'; ;-~....._. - 4dId &&n.dr __
'~...~..-=- ~ ~f~Z: ~ t& . po::&t.~ __..1&..__
.00~1J'~af.1..a~.~:. .",
:EDI:Z ~"'S2....'~.. ~ u- .--.. 1.SS'.ca.
.. ~. .ti.a~~ 5D.Oi "-t ... =- s-~ ,____ g ~
~..S5~~. .~.' .. .
~ .2:"'%2.01:-&. ~~ .....-..-z].,... ~ ~ -.u. '4.3! ~
.~~ . ~r__ ~ SM.lIl:f~ __ 't!Ie .:...o..'Df" ~,""",.
_~ ~..~u _. _ ~:,__~ ._.
.'
__.._~-~___~.c:;
. . ~." . i
~..j. ~TSI0.;\~'~ .i
-----i: i
I.' I
L t
..: t
~' I
!: I
1- 7"! 'i
~ :.;::: !
.~, _I.
f ~;.
~l" . :r:: i
:::'"1
If :::: !
t' "i
~.' :1
t :":L-
f[ ;t: : ::
t
f': z:
t; ~
I
j:'::-: .-\.:::RL'S I:
"m
i';!'
:
.'
t____
'.
..'
~"
W
I '
. i
~~'-~~'C:~~~~'~..~~';:~l~~-:.:.~.~
,SC. ;'~. O' 150' . 30lr
.o;:~q !~nL;)r'G5-~ Li.D. .l.-U.
."L~
Jl-\\'or fCHU:..q Al","-R'!\1!...'"1.~.L.T~n.. W':l".
. .
. ~~ "(~TTtC:
ARK FOREST .APART\fE:\TS se
ern' OF L.~ ?ORTE
I-).!..R.RJS COlSTY. TEXAS'
'.
(H'",,!:R
ni' -L~ {l!':-R:
t.:l'triI. DITKO .
(";~~~."'-~ ~.':"~i'll
".(..1;..'1':\ 2l..~
li.~,";:"! em. TE.\..~ ~::-:3
h~O'""E.: ::.F.i~~."'':;-: .
RLAIl
10'
ur.
IL~~'{~~~J ro-jl._ ti:"i....... I '1
~(I\E'f~!.:P.i..J~ x.100 '(:"r-t:< . ~l..-1!..' .?~A~N ~...:~..;~
.J ::':.)~;:, "X. . '-,_, '.... .' .
.f'!."'n;,:"i"O;~!T. .....-~..-'" _,___.__ _. ';1'~;:,.:,!.", H" _' _,.r!~:.t.!.TA.. ._ _ a~1 ~T"'r-\.:.~";;:';"~-1.;~
.~1'''YP"irt.~_''''';'''~iH':- . ~-;----,,":!.....(_..... . n.-::- '-=,,::~.~;- -- . . '. .; .~:::'l~:..;:"~';::J u..~'~...-:.'-'~~.,,; .U:-Mo.,:-''t ,. :..,....:.:..,,:.."...1 :-
--,- .". 1'1c C fI r<' r On ,\ TI,__- _--""':L~'';.-;-''<...-r' ",.",,"'"
. ~Xl~::-~,~<:\\...~;t;!t~ISE,.. ~\ _._~.LJ__.LJ_J.\.."""'.L-~fl _. '7~~.Jll.~~1, :,:.-.,.c;,'
r .....{y.....-("It,TIJ..." -.-...-._~~-~----...._--..._.:;--- ,'" r
OT 1 .~....--...'=.-l.......:(__k--. ...-... .4..- ...._-..-.,.__~
H,:;~f~302~f~\1~~:~,:ACr !~~~', ", ~~~l{'K;~~
'~~~~~Js\
'CC". -~L~~11f':'" - .'\<'."
..' - ,- ~\ '\
.' h - '1
. PHASE I _ .,' .\!
,,_ 16.21 ACRES ~.
/-JL'. . ."~ - .:. " It ~
/' Ml.1..TI-FA."nn'DE\.ILOP)'''D\. - ., ,
: ';t.u.l\-tui DE.'1Sm' 19 DWD..L.r. "G t~1TS J'Gl. ACJU: /UIT .'
r '. I1E'iSIT\=30S I>WU,UNG\Nn / STAnO'~
- /" . .
'j" /'
It-I, *
/.~..,~. ..
r.
. \ -. . lOT L
Y,-- pLOCK 2,
J.'l!':'G n....1.'!.: ..::::~'n,\.tt;ll~ !l..~t.:t!
~:o'\ l.t~'''" ~~.n
:"':;.f)1.r.r~;-"; t'~."'CJ~W;lf".
, .
n:~'G.... ;(;:.._':..: .1C;{!: r~...CT OrLl"S~::Ot"i o;-nrr \\.".H ;.~:"R.> (.~'~~..:.t.
.;i;-,Tr-:'.."C7 '\(i ..:,;'~~.HAr_"U$COl.':T)'.11:.X.:..." .
D~.4~~.;c.G~' Et..srti.::"fT
p...."!" If~,it-, ..\P..!~ ~TCJo.?;
. 'til.oc:i: 1-) LO! '~r: 'n.F~'t!l. Yr.l.:':r!.,:w"':r.~r '!{..:! .,HtlE..~
. P.i..<-'K.r.:. :: - J UlT n Tl:~ i'.kp?:t~En ml...Tl-i:" 'UL Y nr-\ ll("JP'..t~. ""1
. li.LO-::l-~. 3-1l0-r CO\~.'~r:.lr:=:-v.!.. U~ ~Cl<.L~ .
71'" ROALl R.o. W_ t.; ACRE
C-O!\:;;:ER\'."-.TI(J"l E.l.~L"!::"1 ~_-.~ ,~
. TOlA!. 1h."cr U17_,- Ac:ra:~
\.
. \ -
. . ~~A'
,,\~ \.' {.
-. . oOu ~. "'. r
it,,1?f\.. r
,Oil ' -
. 1lr';C1l~..iu<: . _ -. - " . . .~- _~.i;-11J'. '. -"- ~_. _ _ _~ ~-_-'
on~u~U""~~ ::; "., ~""'ROAD"""" '''..,
~ 192Y JM.Tt'M. ,9'1 ADJt'STMl:!o". """ IlA%A
ll..J:\'AllOSIQ.K", . 42lIi0l!lCSS.' -=F-'=f-7-l-~ :r-=:::'=f- ...
~"L~~6,m6 'r.-j: : I II', l-;-:-I.--r I.A'l'.'+b~'l-- r r~ 'J
fr=<", 11.001.. _ _-1.'..1- . -L .J... ..L~ ..L -L ...1. ~. -,-..i.. L ..L ~ _
!- LJr....\1T.:R U'l!.T Lt.SEltIIo., . t. ut' U~[.:l .
. nu . N-1)Mt] . F1.,L fll..2Kl2I J
1 1
fWl,",:"-li13~!t~.~t
"
.Ai....~Y1U\n $.'9
. u",'!"' "OR.:
._.~
~~-
.~
.,:-&:.
s
. .~
.k'
,~
&
0-
.srRIPTO.
.CJVIC
(~.I'--~J
NOn:, 5E""Eil !>CR\'IC[; ",Ii..!. RUlt1RE .'
A.' 4CRLI:'f!::'<T WJro JKLcTn'OF v.
Jl'ORTI. (iRE. (T!1-.R....~ IDC~JU1iD A ''EEJ)
1 C \ttiX I '1I'RmT"lL"TS TOUJT
.ST.,nO',..cc)
I
_.\~"..
,~
-.~~.
'.
,.
. ' PH.4.SE2:~"
'.. 1~27 AeRtS
- ,~~ftIOPCisu> n'l'iRt J)ENSm'~
. lUMTS.PCl A~ "
rI=~J
)i(J\"EM!lEJl. 6, 1!96
2OIC!: .X-
16' lITlLITY [ASEKENT
"
'~~
....ri:a ,
Llnv.n ;
- ~
-=- I.' t-nL DVl.
(~.,.,1ICDIt.J
-- - -- .
.~. CIa:t-LUl:S ~
.~
I
f.
I.
.. EXlSll!>iC
'FORCE !IUIS'
WOIU.4C1U:S "'.
,.,~ 1tOWa, -
--~
. ~ '0" 1"TlJ.ES~t,
\ .
. -
<:::13
.....<1::-
--, ;.
~<;;:
~ '-f' ,-.
z
~l
51:
-,
~
<
~
~
i. .
<:~
",
-.-'
Q:'
,w~.~
LUzx
. l.lJ
,2: ):t-
'0 iii
Z I.&J g
I.. >a:
- a:: <
;:)~
I- (,o')...J
(I)
<(ON
OZ~
(.) <~
LL Cl?
..J ~
:::> "
,C)-
-'~.- ---=
SEt' 13 T:lllll
SKEET -.ut
- IIQ.
.,...... -
Z::~
:,,-..; ...
-,-
~i<
C';.,;
t
.,
.l
'1
f
i
;r.: {
'I.
< .
;'l~ .1
:..: I
~ i
;:.. T
- 1
z: I
"- :1'
-
....
~ .1
::.. I
...,.
< I'
-
~
~'r
- .;., 0 ft
.. .,.~.
">0,
::...:
i....
..~..
we.
-'~~
!..~
uS,
&[
&Ii
a:
~
...J
...J
l.lJ
1:'
t-
a:
:!.
f3 _~
~~
City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing
September 21,2000
Any person wishing to speak '~;O~ITrON?~ an item being considered by this COmrpisSiO~~ in,
L--__u... ,__ ..___'"'
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::):::::::i::::::R~tia1:N~m~::::):::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
1.
uP
~
fL- \t2J€~
I
3. Eep ~1-c'4('e-
4.
~
., .
+~ (' r " ~ -hv... ~ 1'1'" < c -f,'o v-'
If 5t:A 15 ri #c,e ~p /'
at r h D rS O,-,r a M~ tI!'~ 'T'tfv-
,-'
5'~ 6ru c&",b rooff
e
(fl.d:d ~~/t/~
6.
/13-/;- ~ f/- st.
'./ 1/ ~11~
7.
8.
9.~
It) / s-
10.
City of La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission
Public Hearing
September 21, 2000
~
Any person wishing to speak ~ F~, ~Q&~~?", an item being considered by this Commission must sign in.
L .~=
~-........_~
1.
f-:~ :5 1-.1-5
2.
rl1 ~'~l~~-
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
.- ~
-9.
10.
. .
RECEIVED
A Meeting of the La Porte C} .; 1l>- lt6
pl~nnin~ and Zoning Commission PLANNING
(Type of Meeting)
Scheduled for
September 21, 2000
(Date of Meeting)
to Consider
Special Conditional Use Permit Request #SCUOO-OOl
(Type of Request)
I have received notice of the above referenced public hearing.
I am in FAVOR of granting this request for the following reasons:
.----"
V 11M po r<:. T' A T\J T lV/Z..uJ Dr71J fzllJ P Ui~N'
~ I~ Ti+€ Gt::::"lV.(~/?.A1 A}f<J'2..A, W/~ ('11:;::-/';:0 1tI't:J#?/'E
.
p... I~ 'IV TAL /1(5) tJ t;,/~/(... hi LA 'f7;r:zrr? lUliE. )/I!EI>D
DFZV,.~..J f'lp M/7-NT I", (~N~/<AL. TH/~5 W I ~L fJ.cr7v!AT7l:
7'iI~ 711<.'2- C t<./'2A rlp;..t::> 1s'1 ThI'E. C if'y
I am OPPOSED to granting this request for the following reasons:
't;:
F {ARIZWt.TOAl UJ7=1~tU<;
~~e~kaseprin~
,94. ~'~iPLll~"v{
, gnature
909 Fannin Street, Suite 3205
Address
Houston, Texas 77010-1001
City, State, Zip
POAt~ q-~J"6{) ~
~----\
e
e
.
.
.
.
~ 7- Mt ~c~i~.
q-;),(- (J () .
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
,
Name
Address
F
V) pi 1-1/1 /' J '[t;;'J l <.
1',.
r
f/.
fJ~1
-/ '--'t....... '-_-, -.. ".
/{)'-
/-' ----
( /5
'-
--iill
.~J~~.lill c-
~. td~'; .1(!'\
...... l~ . // ,..,~-'
, ; C/(!/Ji!JJ
J J:jiJ[) 'J &If II
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Fanington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
Address
jtJ 7.2 2 /!/ i
{/ ;.-/,,'
// \: / ~ /ti 7 :;?-f.-/l/ ~
, .
~~~:1;\~D~~J1~
~r}"\.-1 (DVV1~ J~06 f))Utt
/ " /
,]~ PGut'L- ICBZO rJor-l-/j L
/' p~~ .o~O crll-, L
"CV1lL4- < 0 ~ ~O 11. . (~~ i.
. <0 II h~' C
II~ IS ,\I LST
AJ J.. )r
/1/''IIt'--
I,
f~f
(/7)
z;:: :Lf![; (J2Ca})~
/ / ::wcY;V (dcw /l-
. ,T
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Compre~ensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225. 0)
~a~
-i;vn me (~ /1(;2 7 Ai L
J1~ -(&4/ //i>.2/ ~Z-//J ~
tJfInlfl!1 ctt':j7 J;~f)~ (
~ id<riPt ,;;",flc-
~ L'Jlr/1,'A)~
~i~ /)0
Address
d
c.:
I1J.D
. II f.t Z1j 1/ I ('"
/ltz5i l/l)
./
.cv.y) e)C'.,d..-:\hA.}l b .t~
f~3
~tk!JJ' / '-J '1 "r; /' " ,
I' ,(., -, J t<'.l. '// / '
. 7 '__-';V---C,C-:-'-C/ _~V cl)
/ I d{)o~VaJt1 /l
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
. ,
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
(/7)
Name
Address
1f7~6 lJ. li1/J, 0< C
I 9'd / L (7./~.A/. Ly ~ 2
\' //
-L
NL
(?Av0'\f-Cf \ -,<
/
r/
I L~cc) Nt
/16oYI-.J,.hUL. 761
pfrG-El-
k
;.'
~.'
,,:
f>
f'
f;i-
~;;::
: !}
, I::
1.._:"
97:::} :/::/:::1 (I)
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Address
I J /1./ .t&rilA<1dJ-'
(8(3 efl/muJo[)((
-
J
/
f/fGS I
( 'ITl
,--_Z
/1'1 f E '7/ /J ~
--(u t. ;;'Cf I cr --<'--/ I 1/'--'
DW ,<,~ce-v-,
f~O'L Gs-llLp ~~ nJ,
LF'; P C/.!5fc" r1J'. -1IS.~-1J.
,----.
p&b
I
\ /3 /
'-.~'--/
\Ve the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
.....--,,'-:---
~e Address
tfp:L ;.11!'JAAkL /8'(~/(~4Aj7 U.L4J
L'1 iO FZo /'/ Jt9/-vrz' I (j '103 Ou z: -- MLL
(( ((
l'fd 7 Jo~/J ^
tfYvI ~ . V~1u l7v L
6?JC~ U&h-1&0
fAce.
1 0 u 1~
:Y;t.J t?Y;~6S.F /#
J 2.r c1Y?l7~.if ).,;V
f'f' 0 G
+r'
"
: r
r~{
\ '(f (t l ~5 CC~'..b ('....f-:~_\ '
I~~L ~~ ~ s5d'y.'~.
Lv'r P t:/'JT75J 1}'. 1/_\1 /.
(/ /2,
'- -- ,. ,~/'
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Phone #
IIVA
Pj;:://./~~;::j~
.:~rt~,~~,~~,~I~:~D I =~_~' ~
9~~,~ \"l67 L, S,Q, l7d
~( _:BfL_ 2 ~3t\ D~~f l--N'
~ I . \1')(( ~'~ lliJ 1 ~'ILfM
tv. c-k A IVll~_ ') I }32 \ \ It ~u
,;:1
/ If
32'-1 Ll~/l..eS5 !fl.
3d'! 0pM4J ~ (
!....':'-.lLL.t'<-..
. "\
pd
<..l-"'I~~-"
I ~ b L- L:s1'\ ~ ~:D-(J.., R I
LA Pdi:rC~17rl(
\Ve the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
@
Name Address
<'N""'" Q,~'l HtZj\ qctCl'l f\RCi~w~7 DR. lA- POl~
DCc-\M: lit1 L/l{crz<" 416ft A Vr I, [llV" /J. {a Jt~
.Y !
y..gf'lYl~fJ1 Lc2CH'i'nqj 4qo9 (}R~tv:ew LA ?o-ie
"""
5k5tffo;}. C('ts'ti~/c~l L;. ;:br1
z
,
~':
f
/"
r
ii,.,
I,
"
''-
f,
v. .
!
f,
f'
i
t:
"
((',--Y 10-~
V/~ I
l)L
f&3
~
~,,--,- -.....-'--" J
J <{ 02.- L-CT>1 0/ 3cf'~-~ r4J
L(>r (J6fi:(J5. <~, flr)/
We the undersigned residents of La Porte ,1;'x. petition the City of La Porte ~/-7
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax llY
School- Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name Address
.:r: c-. J-Je b -c,v + ( 0 if () 3 i2 ~ ~ -I-/c- (; 4:-+' e-
~ I 0 Ip~H e"..",tp: - b-&r ,
~p 'ffftf;~ /1)#3/ltl67/c;2x.c,
~~.~ EfQ]<klt~~ /D<fD3 ~ud.~Kce..fc
~ :1 ~y f! ~ 5" J 9 a ,7 .,t. t> J?7,q, '>< .J ~ hue / ~ n
.o/h~!~~ /9i)LomQK- ~~ot5/Rd
):ff ~ ~ ~!i!
,/)}.; J~J~j /1./ /:JJdL~J.
~ L~~~
'L ~ :--:--.
f&)-
9,nll\jl
J~ U>\~'CYc0t~
i ~ 6-z.. Lo"?A)' :s~,~Q ~.
Lp.. PcP~(C: 1)::. '77.S: 71
0/)
,------
We the undersigned residents of La Port~ Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
.~
""~.:.
~
. .
" r
J \: 1\':,
I,
t.
l J.'
f
l,;
f::
I
i
I
i
[
.U I L'-..'..j -Ci- '''_ -
f(,1
(~ 6L- tc5]11 ~ -S_~~ (l~,
LA" P e/L,\ c<1J<. 7 7 -S~ f.
(jj)
,/
Wr:; the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd, and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
Address
A6>N e. bu u BAt.. )0 7;J..lj /lJoR7/-I L. ,J
tt;s~:tJ; ~:~ ~4 .:
I ': cJi n :. ~~ z t ~ rJell):
S~YSON ~obo(J-3orJ ~9a6 6/e.u tk){.e.,y
tcA4'rel ;(4!Ol'1 110)"" )1.ft1ldwCr/~-I
~ 4 /0 '1 ec \ L~~
Cl q to ~~ ~~<0Qt\?~l
}{: I \' c:..C\.~ e,+h G ~ n ') Lf\o d C r ee1', \J' ,'(' l ~)D ,',
1JlO-1.-1J~b ..kt,tiM-. /o,c::n =? ~ f
~~ ~{,!.~ JuSe, ~ ~ e
" ~ oL/lS C/lRLotJ it!
, 11
-
\ .
Eifr2L tJu~
LI7 j- 73 be;
We the undersigned residents of La Porte }x. petition the City of La Porte /f9J
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax ~
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
Address (' /
() () -;-M~ ~
L
ol%/
t~ '
i-:.~
r
o-
f 031 S- eoc/c-l.f4/1t
0., ~I-ol.-LO\,~
I j
ID?tJ~
f~J
l>f\<...L
c.--
E/lI::![ L/C(.'cO.lV
</7/- 73 G 9
~;~~~.~.'
'vVe the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
Address
f
I"
~:
., . ~:r:t; l~n6-~vs7;= 7?6ek
~,
f.':
t:",
t;:
!"
I.
;:; ?1
· ("J'".
;e- 1-
'--' --
L/7/- :73 (,9
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Port/!1]
.' ~
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Address
,-, ( I"
:.=J lc:.~ L l.LCC r-......
c!;jfR( IYCCCO/V
Lj?/ ~ 73{9
(j])
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Ix. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Address
/6-3
II let (0lL~, I') l'flCL lL-}-'
, "/ oJ
.J ~ I - BZ - (I J ,)
\ 103 LOnl{~1 :clc'CL l?cL
u-- rD(tc) T-i-- '1157 /
()/
We the undersigned residents of La PorteTx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to 'remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
I
r
r;
~'
w.
~~ 110 Zf., DC<.--r-~;:A
. A
?S~cb ~ 11e3/?'V~'i p)
J
1(/
6~lbl;~~~r
AD
(l16e'L---
~~ (2. ,
r
J)k ~~ .
~
~
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
'./ G.___
Address
D
~h~N'lI~(lao IOlLi 0 ~ffi3h f 51,
I
"
F~
r~
i~;
r.
~:.
f'
\
t~
t
t.,
t:
i
! r_::tJ!'_:-
;J-
u.z; /'v-V; f /<-/ t.:, ~y<:_ ~~
d-!J-CX J. / ~ Ii >( S;~NC() ~ IZt
LA PM-rSj TF ,77 S-~ /
\Ve the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Address
~._"
52:
<-
~-;
La..:'
r
t~-
r:
f
~,
1':-
"
;
O;L 7 7 ;J 1+ LfJ
, L.r
o;L?9 /11, II.
$:~/:~ NN:' L/
)uu7f ~ /tJ33J,I\J.;/, L-~
/GV
" '''j
,/ ,171
\ -" ;.,,/
d ,,(),J ':/
5tif'f'
, :
5 H-/ff-OfV./
I 5'if11'IbJVs
I
sHnfbP
f& I
/
JY ~id& I.A
h;Zj DR],?)
Jd B- 1. L.(jw)~ x 5 (!;I,[ Cy_ C2
04 Po!<-TtJ' Ti 71~,
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection ?f Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
/j)
/" '
.,' ! /
1 -
"-
c
~
; !-
· F
t"',
f)"
I"
, !~
: ~;,.,',,'.,
~f'"
l:,
t,
(.::
..;\'
r
f;'
pG-1
~\ (YV,
JIM ;f;::J/1-/}15
/ bOb UJ /11 It X S elite L
/f",f
{../!-/'dj(' 7~ -/2 '7'757
ptl -tj 7c) -;J 3
\Ve the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte 7?
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
0)
Name
-----
ji /r7 .---, --v / /
/gcJ;L UJ/Jj/J-:.\( SC/!c-rL 1-(/
L/I-~~7>- ~ ?;7_S7/
1770.- b6~
\Ve the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
cormecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
f!'r0-IO
j(A-y <SCu? 7
/ YC-;.L L(),rYl/f-:>( .Scllc':rc,f-?~
L~()R~7;ZX 7767/
L!?O ~ 6Go~
Vie the undersigned residents of La Porte Ix. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection .of Fanington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Park.-way to Highway 225.
Name Address
(}/,,^/ 1J~~ L 05Y/ A1L~
~ ~('>>}JlJi) \\'\00 ~\&-
%A1/lPd ~)Le_ ~ 1/j- (/ S-7
?jjJ;,~~ () I 060: ~~~
./ ~/{. _ /6r1/~_ //A,/~
~' r;J~ C, /{JO/~ /~
/;.} Iled;;!c h //1.VC-'lco/c l{/;zlf~"-
~ ()1) ilk
l : ~vt1L
J
';..~
~' .
r
t.
f!1(J--'C-9
L.
/..----......,
/, '7)
\ I / _ /
Cf/f- .,:
, .. -i"O# ~
" :
I
fi
~
'~
, ;~;.'.'..
<:
c;
r'
r
r
!
i
/ jd;l/La--;n~"r s'c/ltc'( /
,::-''>'; C/7i /I/+t-L MC2: //_vtY
~J1AJR-77 -<< ?7S7;
~l/-C/}()-b6 gS-
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection 'ofFarrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
(/;'
,,-,- '
Address
1<"
/{ r
!
, i
.
I
I
i
'7/rLuladt
,P& 8
[.
i
r
r
I'
I
i
,
I'
I,
/:
i t
; }
I
r
I / ' /
/ to 2- Lo /11 J9-X S, cf/0 L /-i
UjJOi'/7 '-;x ?JS---7j
,t!/-Lj7{)-66g)
,;/ e the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax//;-;J
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to (,_~.:.-.J
connecting Fairmont Par1.'V.'ay to Highway 225.
1&1
I 2 (; 2' L-v /1-; /f-X ..5' c ffqjZ ;?61
i-/J(JO!<7L ~ 77S"-~/
?8/- t/70.- 6~8jr-
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Ix. petition the City of La Porte
Ix. to abandon the proposed connection of Fanington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
~~IP
, (, ~t-.:J
..i; (LI ~Il..,J
(J~
Name
,
~
L (
b C/fl( UJ6U
:, ~
0.3 S- / Wi/llO/tV?
, II '
/o3~ /
fc; f:
/ ~62 LD/7J/)-X 5c/103L- jut,
L-19-r'cJtf~Z? ?{? 7~;j
;J-~/-L/7~-bt t-S
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Ix. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Park\vay to Highway 225.
~~
" I -.
I I
:SC~~
J!
:"
, ~
I!I(..'.'.....
'..'
'0;
,.-.
.;....-
~
~,
fif
\
:~ f ~'. F~ ,
/ fjlJ2- Lom/I;<' 5 c/fr/L p'
~)9- f't> /( 7t: / --?[( -;7? 5~
;:ZS/-c!-70- bb~
@
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Ix. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
Name
Address
v' ~. \
~~-'~" o':L~_ 'D",'tZ "('cd: ~ +1
\./D', .
/ ,1I1J;I !!fl-1AH. 1<' 5 6-Y~L; i?r:rt2
~)~_ \ ,~i/" Yr /-f S Irb4 L (q+l:tt!::-
~{Lhn/)nf~fi.i 1~1 J051tJ" XI,t'i ('KiCK-
~ . .
,._It? /. '/:",/. ,,(':
z~', '
~ '
'l~.
"'r
"
, ~'~',:'.',',,"
::'.:.
I ,~:'.'
f\
r'
f '
L,
!L
f& 1 tJ
t <-{ " - - ""'~'
/ 66.2 UJ/l.1)!.- x S c jfdJL :~
Uj?t1~7~ ~ ??-> 0
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection df Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Faim10nt Parkway to Highway 225.
~--\
///7.'
( , _/
"---,~-:~.-
Name Address
~~,,~_2)~^~ \t>3D0 Ca:tiUt
i\~~ ~~a/
51{PAr~~7ft::- / ;Y/(J f!//47T
----;y-~ ~ L /tJ3itJ ~Hdt-
vahm~ Lf~J /J!)3/8~~
. B~~f'b I,Luo-~l~ /0 3l/7 11~~f
./~.tw'vA- 9-;/ ~ / C 5'~:? 15'4;7
0i, fl. s~ 10339 SEL.FA-S1
If
Ii
I
I'
f
;
':,;'
:,t"
~,
I','
fG3
'.: ;~,., _.-::~......... \..--:-..,..
I' . , I " L- r?c{
/ 302 L6/11"A>; .5 c/~
U-f/6re7~ /X' '7759&
cP-g 1-(/JcJ-G,~f5
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection 6f Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
......--.--.....,
i '
i ~,
,
1
r ~~033~A~
I t' CAl, IS' I O~e . 3J621W'--
! r' I\xlLl Ut.16""
, L ,r. io 333" 'm
/~~ 6/
Address
{Zrd~~4Y\__/
'r'" /1 .
.-:n~
,d-at.:Ltl .b~~
ft
\ < (- oj :: -:" ~::L',:,
~,
I (50 ~ LOn/~T'A oc.:.41-....<...--r~\
LfrPo~7?'7K "7707/
Lj-?cJ -b6~S- /
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
.' ....-.-""
( ) ')
/6>6//) 1ttd :P
02'1 5 NcR.-ni H
\
i.
...
,
I
! !
t8~/;l,>.
'//
./
'"
...
. /~.}
, .
I \-
'- ,,-.\
. ()
-5
c::::::7Jt4,YLJY\ I' { Ij
/07 Db iU_f/
~ for+-e TY7 75'7/
(
~g0 Lf 7/-( '/15
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte. ~,
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection df Farrington Blvd. and Lomax /;L..() )
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to ~
connecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225.
I:::: }J P
I AI. P,
I ( ( (\ b N() .. P
ll\ D b Nq) , P
. JJ I 0 & }J o. PI
'5 fd ee>fr'U
L
~ XI/OOL lZ~
O~G
.z,..1"iJ 1.. J-.o~ sc:tlo..t,
II d-OV 14. tIut. H
lC-f;;--. c:. ~ 233;) DA~
4c. 4/1~2:?32- /J~~YI~ LN.
'K,\ ~'1:!J{)/~ d7?<h ~'VeJ'A_"
,1
~~r~~ ;;-r;' ~~;/r
/R- fcf+-C('Yp77~
e Z?I] lflf -r'f!f5
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to ~
cOnnecting Fairmont Parkway to Highway 225. ~
Address
\ '.
I
i
i
I
I
!
i
I
-- '--"'--i-" .
~;~_~~,"i
~.
,
t
f'
1"-
r
J;"
f'
I"
r'
"
t'
r:'
:J
<:::7-1l~ 0 J1 I '-<- 1 I y
j,O~7fl f!d/x. 77> 7(
t-U-, rt:J f"0 C
&&0 L/7/-1L/!/5
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte (jj)
Tx. to abandon 'the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
cO~~'~7tf!W 5airmont Parkway to Highway 225.
, ':-:.;",.;-':')">.1""'.'<
;,,: ."',~,,':,>,",~'.,-' " '
t
,
t".".
, I~:,,;;
J-.
",-""., "'\,.., VI,' . _, ";
/ 0 7 0 0 fIJ, H
La.. fo I'fe ,IY 7757)
&. <g I) If 7/- / YLfS
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection of Farrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove all "Comprehensive Plan" references to
connecting Fainnont Pllfkway to Highway 225. C!ffJ
''';, t
I -
}
CA'.f/€,5
'570
d-!) <<--ro t1 / cc I {1
/ 0706 IJ. II-
l-~ Po (fe ;rX 7757)
l~8() Y 7/-It.;Lf5
,,"
,,' .
We the undersigned residents of La Porte Tx. petition the City of La Porte
Tx. to abandon the proposed connection dfFarrington Blvd. and Lomax
School Road and to remove.all "Compryhensive Plan" references to
. .' . - . -
connecting Fairmont Parkw~y<.t9JIi hWay 225~ .
,;, -l:,:~~~;.. .>.('~\\f'.' . ";:;':;)::~.'[ .'~'
Name Aaaress;'.. .....' ....(. '.,
:.;.i};JE:~?~f.;~:ffi1~1~~~~1"":: . :~~~.~{;;~Cf":
(jjJ
011~
. r r -:0 \ \ 1\ S ~ ~Vf' 1+.
.... . ~ / / /}.6'~;{t. /w.J. If
a~ j~--&-d I) 7// JP:/D'f!.- tW? II
3f.c .'~,
'i i
-,
... .--
/l8-18.
.' )1
~
1. For the Public Record; we are giving you a copy of our petition to
remove all 3 phases of the proposed Farrington extension from the
Comprehensive Plan.
2.570+ Citizens have signed the petition that was circulated by 13 of our
now 30 coordinators. About half the signatures are from Lomax and
half are from Glen Meadows and Fairmont Park.
3. For a comparison of this public sentiment, only 997 citizens voted
in the City general election that preceded. our petition.
4. 22 of our Coordinators attended the last Comprehensive Plan Public
Forum and te-submi~ritten comments AGAINST the Phase 1 Road
and the Proposed H street Bridge. NO ONE submitted a
comment favoring the Phase 1 Road or H street Bridge.
5. Unlike most subdivisions, WE only have a few dead ends to control
through traffic and the dead end at H street and the tee at Lomax
School Road are the most important because of their locations.
6. Your information package contains the details of why we are very
serious about protecting what little is left of our traffic safety net for
our Children and Ourselves.
7. Your package contains a video glimpse of the traffic dangers we have
to face every day. Please view it, read the details, and consider the
numbers of Citizens that are against the Phase 1 Road and H street
Bridge; as part of your due diligence responsibility on this .issue. Even
though You vote tonight ,You can call your respective council member
later with a fresh opinion from our information. WE DON'T WANT
ANY MORE WlllTE CROSSES IN OUR NEIGHBOORHOODS.
8. The Bayshore Sun Summed it up very well. This is still a free Country
and the Citizens bf the neighborhoods should decide what is
in their best safety interests, not the fire chief or the police chief.
9. Mr. Guttery's newspaper comment that "Our Advisory Circular on
Airport Design does not preclude roads from being in RPZs . WE
simply encourage the communities not to develop any places of public
assembly in this part of the RPZ". Let's look at the facts.
~ I1t &ft ~ 9-,J-/-oo.
"
f1I'.. -
~~
u.s, DeportmenT
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
AdmlnistraHoo
. " )
Advisory
Circular
Subject: AIRPORT DESIGN
':' ;
_~ _~_",. .._.~__",~~~,,....~,,,.,....,,,. _~ ..c_.._~~~.__._"'H"""U "'_ ,.._< ~." ~~,,~~,~."''''.hW'''...un'''
Date: 91291S9
Initilted by: AAS-IIO
AC No: 150/5300-13
(lllRge:
,,-...-...........--
1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC)
contains the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA)
standards and recommendations for airport design.
z. CANCELLATION. This (Aq cancels the
following publications:
a. AC 150/5300-20, Airport Design
Standards-Site Requirements for Terminal
Navigational Facilities. dated March 10, 1980.
b. AC 150/S300-4B. Utility AirportS-Air
Access to National Transportation, dated
June 24, 1915.
i:
Co AC 150/5300-12, Airport Design
StandardsuTransport Airports, dated
Fehruary 28, 1983.
: ~~ Z.'Ww.UJ.--.
.Leonard E. Mudd, Director
office of Airport Safet~ and standards
. i
d. AC 15O/5325-SC. Aircraft Dala, dated
June 29, 1987.
e. AC 15015335-2, Airport Aprons, dated
January 27, 1965.
J. APPIJCATION. The standards and
recommendations contained in this advisol)' circular'
are recommended by (he Federal Aviation
AdmInistration (or use in the design of civil airports.
f'Oc airport projects receiving Fed~1 ~nt-in-aid
assistance. the use of th~dards ~ndato.v
At certifir2fcd~. airports. the standar sand
recommendations may be used to satisfy specific
requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)
Pan 139, Cenific;ation aad OperatiQns: Land Airports
Serving Certain Air Carriers, Subpart D.
, ~ \ 1.
^~ 150/5300-13 CI Ie; :;
(c) When the thresholds are
staggered and the approach is to the far threshold, the
minimum 2,500-foot (762 01) separation requires an
increase of 100 feet (30 m) for every 500 feet (I 52 01)
of threshold stagger.
209. RUNWAY TO PARALLEL TAXIWAY
AND TAXILANE SEPARATION.
a. Standards. Tables 2-1 and 2-2 present
the runway centerline to parallel taxiwayltaxilane
centerline separation standard. This distance is such to
satisfy the requirement that no part of an aircraft (tail
tip, wing tip) on taxiway/taxilane centerline is within
the runway safety area or penetrates the obstacle free
zone (OFZ). The computer program cited in
appendix II may be used to detennine the increase to
these separation distances for elevation.
b. Recommendations. To have room for
the acute-angled exit taxiway, provide a runway
centerline to parallel taxiway centerline of at least 400
feet (120 m) for Airplane Design Groups I and II,
500 feet (150 m) for Airplane Design Group III, and
600 feet (180 m) for Airplane Design Groups IV, V,
and VI.
210. BUILDING RESTRICfION LINE lBRL).
A BRL should be placed on an airport layout plan for
identifying suitable building area locations on airports.
The BRL should encompass' the runway protection
zOnes, the runway. object free area, ~e runway
visibility zone (see pSragraph 503), NA V AID critical
areas. areas ~uired for terminal instrument
procedures, and airport traffic control tower clear line
of sight
,~t~'~om~ CLE~G CRlTE~. Safe ~d
'.~ effi\M*Operations at an auport reqwre that certam
areas on and near the airport be clear of objects or
restricted to objects with a certain function,
oom~ition, and/or height The object clearing
criteria subdivides the 14 CFR Part 77, Subpart C,
airSpace and the object free area (OFA) ground area by
type of objects tolerated within each subdivision.
Aircraft are oontrolled by the aircraft operating roles
and not by this criteria.
a. Standards.
requirements are as follows:
Object
clearance
(1) ObiedFree-Area (OFA). Object
free areas require clearing of objects as specified in
paragraph 307~ Runway Object Free Area, and
paragraph 404, Taxiway and Taxilane Object Free
Area (OFA).
12
2/14/97
'"
"
(2) RunwaY and Taxiway Safely
Areas. Runway and taxiway safety areas require
clearing of objects, except for objects that need to be
located in the runway or taxiway safety area because of
their function. Objects higher thall 3 inches (7.6 cm)
above grade should be constructed on low impact
resistant supports (frangible mounted structures) of the
lowest practical height with the frangible point no
higl1er than 3 inches (7.6 cm) above grade. Other
objects, such as manholes, should be constructed at
grade. In no case should their height exceed 3 inches
(7.6 cm) above grade. Underground fuel storage
facilities should not be located within runway and
taxiway safety areas (see AC 150/5230-4), Aircrafi
Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports).
Tables 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, and 4-1 specify runway and
taxiway safety area standard dimensions.
(3) Obstacle' Free Zone (0 FZ).
Obstacle Free Zones require clearing of object
penetrations, except for frangible visual NA V AIDs that
need to be located in the OFZ because of their fimction.
Paragraph 306 specifies OFZ standard dimensions.
(4) Threshold. The threshold obstacle
clearance surfaces, defmed in Appendix 2,
paragraph S, require clearing of object penetrations.
(5) NA V AIDs. Certain areas require
clearing for the establishment and operation of
NA V AIDs. These NA V AID critical ~ are depicted
in chapter 6.
I, ~ .. ", \
(6) 14 CFR Part 77 ObstmdioDS' to
Air Navi2atioD. Obstructions .to air navigation must
be removed unless an FAA aeronautical study, based
on proposed operations, determined othmvise. To
determine otherwise, the FAA must find DO substantial
adverse effect as defined in Order 7400.2;' Procedures
for Handling Airspace Mafters.. Qapter 7, Evaluating
Aeronautical Effect, Section 1, General. The FAA,
normally, limits aeronautical studies of existing objects
to obstructions to air navigation which are Dot included
in the criteria cited in paragraphs 211a(1) through (5).
(7) ,Runway.. Protection ZOne. (RPZ).
The RP~earing of incompatible objects and
activities as specified in paragraphs 2118(I)(a) and
212a(2).
(8) General. Other objects which
require clearing are those which generally can have an
adverse effect on the airport. These include objects in
the inner part of the approach area (coinciding with the
RPZ) such as fuel handling and storage facilities,
smoke and dust generating activities" misleading
lights, and those which may create glare or attract
wildlife.
Chap 2
,
.
2/14/97
o. Recommendations. Other objects which
are desirable to clear, if practicable, are objects which
do not have a substantial adverse effect on the airport
but, if removed, will enhance operations. These
include objects in the controlled activity area and
obstructions to air navigation which are not covered in
paragraph 211.a, especially those penetrating an
approach surface. On a paved runway, the approach
surface starts 200 feet (61 m) beyond the area usable
for takeoff or landing, whichever is more demanding.
On an unpaved runway, the approach surface starts at
the end of the area usable for takeoff or landing.
212. RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ).
The RPZ's function is to enhance the protection of
people and property on the ground. This is achieved
through airport owner control over RPZs. Such control
includes clearing RPZ areas (and maintaining them
clear) of incompatible objects and activities. Control is
preferably exercised through the acquisition of
sufficient property interest in the RPZ.
a. Standards.
(1) RPZ Confil!urationlLocation. The
RPZ is trapezoidal in shape and centered about the
extended runway centerline. The controlled activity
area and a portion of the Runway OFA are the two
components of the RPZ (see figure 2-3). The RPZ
dimension for a particular runway end is a function of
the type of aircraft and approach visibility minimum
associated with that runway end., Table 2-4 provides
standmI.4im~*..:RPZs.' Other than with a
~ application of dec1ared distances, the RPZ
~ 200 feet (60 m) beyond the end of the area
usable for takeoff or landing. With a special
application of declarcd-distances, see Appendix 14,
separate approach and departure RPZs are required for
each nmway end.
.
(a) The Runwav OFA.
Paragraph 307 contains the location, dimension, and
clearing standards for the Runway OFA.
(b) The CoatroUed Activity
A!g. The controlled activity area is the portion of the
RPZ beyond and to the sides of the Runway OFA.
Chap 2
(2) Land Use. In addition to the
criteria specified in paragraph 211, the following land
lIse criteria apply within the RPZ:
(a) While it is desirable to clear
all objects from the RPZ, some uses are permitted,
provided they do not attract wildlife, are outside of th~
Runway OFA, and do not interfere with navigational
aids. Golf courses (but not club houses) and
agricultural operations (other than forest!)' or livestock
farms) are expressly permitted under this proviso.
Automobile parking facilities, although discouraged,
may be pennitted, provided the parking facilities and
any associated appurtenances, in addition to meeting
all of the preceding conditions, are located outside of
the object free area extension (as depicted in
figure 2-3). Fuel storage facilities should not be
located in the RPZ.
(b) Land us rohibited om the
RPZ are: residences .and places of pu ic assembly.
(Churches, schools, hospitals, office buildings,
shopping centers, and other uses with similar
concentrations of persons typify places of public
assembly.) Fuel storage facilities should not be located
in the RPZ.
b. Recommendations. Where it is
determined to be impracticable for the airport owner to
acquire and plan the land uses within the entire RPz,
the RPZ land use standards have recommendation
status for that portion of the RPZ not controlled by the
airport owner. ~.~ 'l.
c. FAA Studies of Obiects and Activities
in the Vicinity of Airports. The FAA policy is to
protect the public investment in the national airport
system. To implement this policy, the FAA studies
existing and proposed objects and .'8Ctivities, both off
and on public-'USC airports, with respect to thci( effect
upon the safe and efficient use of the ahports and
safety of pcISODS and property on the ground. These
objects need not be obstructions to air naVigation, as
defined in 14 a<R Part 77.:;:As the result of . study,
the FAA may issue an' edViso.y rccommeodationin
opposition to the prcsco.ce of any off-airportobject or
activity in the vicinity of a publio-use airport that
conflicts, with an airport planning or design standard or
recommendation.
213. to 299. RESERVED.
13
Approach Facilities Dimensions
Visibility Expected Inner Out<.:r
Length Width Width RPZ
Minimums 1/ To Serve L WI \\'2
f<.:<.:t f<.:et f<.:<.:t acres
(meters) (meters) (met<.:rs)
Small
Aircraft 1,000 250 450 8.035
Exclusively (300) (75) ( 135)
Visual Aircraft
and Approach 1,000 500 700 13.770
Not lower than Categories (300) (150) (210)
I-Mile (1600 m) A&ll
Aircraft
Approach 1,700 500 1,010 29.465
Categories (510) (150) (303 )
C&D
Not lower than All 1,700 1,000 1,510 48.978
3/4-Mile (I 200 m) Aircraft (510) (300) (453)
Lower Than All 2,500 1,000 1,750 78.914
3/4-Mile ( 1200 m) Airaaft (750) (300) (525)
Tallie 2-~. [{ullwa\, lrO(CCI;OIl wile I{I'I,) dimcllsiolls
^C 150/53.0(lj OJ(
11110/91
11 The RPZ dimensional standards are for the runway end with the specified approach visibility minirnwns. The departure RPZ
dimensional standards are equal to or less than the approach RPZ dimensional standards. When a RPZ begins other than 200 feet (60 m)
beyond the runway end, separate approach and departure RPZs should be provided. Refer to apperidix.14 for approach and departure RPZs.
. , . ~
.. ~ . ., ,I..'
" ~.~~,; I '\
.~.
:~_WI:~',::~:: ;~. tJ..t
Chap 2
~79-;;V-dO
Dear P & Z member
We would appreciate your viewing the enclosed 23 minute video tape. We think
that for those P &Z commission members who live in subdivisions with sidewalks,
curbs, and quiet streets, it may be hard to see the traffic dangers in Lomax where
the main streets are our sidewalks and they fall off into deep ditches. If a picture
is worth a 1000 words; then this video speaks volumes about the negative safety
impact the Phase 1 Road will have on the children and citizens of our residential
neighborhood. For those members that already live under the conditions you see
on the video, We think you'll understand our safety concerns.
The video was filmed from a mail box located in the North half of Lomax
School Road; 3 ft. from the road edge, looking North. The junction at the stop
sign is "P" street. The Rodeo Arena, Fire Station # 3, the ball field, and the Old
Lomax City Hall are on the right. A section of North West Park is on the left. The
video is compressed from 6 hrs. of taping. The video segments are "the middle of
the road" concerning traffic volume and speed. There are times with no traffic for
a few minutes, and there are times during special events at the Rodeo Arena
when traffic is much heavier than in the video. The segment from minute 7:45 to
15 is continuos. Most of the traffic you see whizzing by the stop sign is traveling
50 + miles an hour... through a residential area where residents have to back out
onto the road; children ride their bikes and walk 4H animals; and residents ride
their horses to the arena...all on the same narrow roads with the heavy fast
traffic you see in the video.
Minute 2: 10 captures our greatest safety concern. When the child on the bicycle
darts into the road, the car moves into the on coming lane to avoid hitting the
child. A White Cross stands by the road just 60 ft. from where the child was
almost run over. That White Cross belongs to a young man that was hit and killed
by a vehicle. Moving into the oncoming lane is the safety net that lets us cope
with a very dangerous traffic situation in Lomax and it is repeated many times
every day. You will see the safety net used 3 more times, just in this video.
Richard Wong's July 27, 1999 technical report on the Phase 1 Road
emphasis's that the Phase 1 Road will increase cut through traffic in the Glen
Meadows and Lomax Neighborhoods. Under Recommendations, Mr. Wong
States that Not having the Phase 1 Road, "...significantly burdens other area
roadways including arterial, collector and local residential streets." The other
roadways he speaks of are Sens Road and Underwood Road. If that is true, then
the small 2 lane Phase 1 Road through a residential neighborhood would have to
have bumper to bumper high speed traffic in the effort to relieve the
"significant burden" on the two major commercial roads of Sens and Underwood.
The Dangerous traffic on Myrtle Creek that has been a major issue for so long
also emphasizes the Phase 1 Road will increase traffic. In the Myrtle Creek
issue drivers were cutting through the Creekmont residential area on Myrtle
Creek to avoid the 1 signal light at Spencer/Underwood. Myrtle Creek is a
2
..
winding road with 2 stop signs. Would drivers choose to avoid that same
Spencer/Underwood signal light. . . PLUS 3 more congested signal lights by
traveling down Farrington to P street, then to Underwood through what would
probably be 3 stop signs? Myrtle Creek has already given us the answer to that
question. Traffic will increase greatly and our safety net would vanish.
After viewing the video We think you'll understand why We believe the Phase 1
Road is not just a bad Idea; It is a serious disregard for the public safety of
our citizens.
We apologize for the Video being out of focus near "P" Street. The camera was
focused short range to help you see what it is like to be close to the road with fast
traffic whizzing by a few feet away; but it really did not accomplish that. It seems
that that experience needs to be first hand so we invite you spend a little time in
our neighborhood and get the first hand feel of what it is like to ride a horse, bike,
or walk intermingled with fast traffic on narrow roads with steep ditches, and in
many areas, no road shoulders. We'll gladly supply the bike or horse for your
experience.
Mrs. Waters;
We have studied the audio tape of the 3-16-00 P&Z meeting about the Phase
1 road and we would like to present the following facts about statements made
in that meeting. We have provided an audio tape of the meeting for your
reference:
1. Consultant Project Manager, Consultant Bret Keast introduced Fire Chief Joe Sease &,
Police Chief Richard Reff as,"..the City staff members here tonight; They want to kind of
present an objective overview of pros & cons I guess" of extending some form of connection
between the Farrington Rd. & Lomax School Rd." Mike Clausen with the School District
Transportation also spoke.
Joe Sease, Richard Reff, & Mike Clausen, whose jobs are our safety, presented NO cons
on the Phase 1 road. They were not objective, and many of their statements were not correct.
I talked with Mr. Sease & Mr. Clausen in 98' about the safety concerns of the 574 citizens
signing the petition to stop all 3 phases of the proposed Highway, so they were well aware
of the "cons" & yet they did not say one word about the "cons".
Fire Chief Sease stated that the EMS (ambulance) needs Phase I; but he had to admit in
our last talk that because EMS is located near Sens at Spencer; Phase 1 could only be an
advantage in response time if an ambulance was returning on Spencer empty, if it was just
opposite Phase 1, and if it was re-routed to an emergency in Lomax that was just opposite
Phase 1 at that very moment; and that is a lot of ifs. Mr. Sease has admitted in writing in
response to an Open Records request that he has not done any study or data analysis to
prove his opinion that Phase 1 would lessen Citizen's exposure to fire damage.
Mr. Reft's speech centered on "considerable delays in response times" and "comparing
response times" for the police. I have studied Mr. Reft's data through several meetings with
3
r
him and he has had to admit that he has NO data about response times and can not even
begin to "compare response times."
Mr. Reff also failed to state that the police were short 6 patrol officers and that was the major
reason for any delayed response that might occur.
Mr. Clausen stated that he wants Phase 1 because busing on Underwood and Spencer are
a safety concern... but he plans to bus children through an Airport Runway Protection Zone
and an Airport Object Free Zone. He said Lomax children are bused because we "don't have
a whole lot of sidewalks and nice places for children to walk to school". The fact that Mr.
Clausen so carefully avoided, is that most Lomax streets are so dangerous and such a safety
hazard that most adults won't travel on them on anything less than a vehicle and so he has to
bus the students. He also spoke about shorter bus routes to Glen Meadows. He did NOT state
the fact that if Phase 1 is built, there will not be any bus routes through Glen Meadows to
Lomax Elementary because L.P.I.S.D. will not bus within a 2 mile travel radius of a school.
And remember; these people were introduced as objective staff that would give the con$ as
well as the pros.
I could spend several more pages exposing the deceptions and incorrect statements
presented in that 3-16-00 meeting....but I think you get the point.
For those few at City Hall who have repeatedly shut their eyes and ears to the dangers; we'll
state it again. There are deep ditches and NO side walks on the main traveled H, L, P and
LSR streets of Lomax. Children and adults, who ride horses, ride bikes, jog, walk, exercise 4H
projects, etc. , have to mix with high volume, high speed traffic in the street and the only
safety net we have to cope with this already dangerous situation is the ability of vehicles to
pass into the oncoming lane. As traffic increases; this safety net goes away, and the
probability of another White Cross like the one belonging to young Joseph Mann at Lomax
School Rd. & P street, increases dramatically.
While Mr. Sease's and Mr. Reft's excuses for building Phase 1 are nothing but ifs & maybes
that they can't even quantify; the danger from traffic on Lomax streets is real and it occurs
many times every day. The White Cross on P Street proves that fact and the 3 occurrences
on your Video prove that fact.
Thanks for your time and consideration;
Bill Scott, Treasurer for the GPAC, Common Sense Government