Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-15-2004 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing of the La Porte Planning and Zoning CommissionMinutes of the Meeting • • ow, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 2004 Members Present: Doretta Finch, Ralph Dorsett, Kirby Linscomb, Jr., Nick Barrera, Paul Berner; Alternate Members Hal Lawler and Ross Morris Members Absent: Betty Waters, Dottie Kaminski City Staff Present: Interim Planning Director Nick Finan, Planning Coordinator Masood Malik, City Prosecutor Clark Askins, Planning Secretary Peggy Lee I. CALL TO ORDER. City Prosecutor Clark Askins called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. and announced the absence of both the Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson. He noted Alternate Members Hal Lawler and Ross Morris were to assume voting responsibilities of the absent members, and the Commission would need to appoint an Acting Vice Chairperson to conduct the meeting. Motion by Doretta Finch to nominate Ralph Dorsett as Acting Vice Chairperson. Second by Nick Barrera. The motion carried. Ayes: Finch, Barrera, Linscomb, Berner, Morris, and Lawler Nays: None Abstain: None 11. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 20, 2003 REGULAR MEETING & PUBLIC HEARING. Motion by Hal Lawler to approve the Minutes of November 20, 2003. Second by Ross Moms. The motion carried. Ayes: Lawler, Morris, Finch, Barrera, Linscomb, and Berner Nays: None Abstain: None III. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #SCU03-004 FOR 5.89 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF McCABE ROAD, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 5G & 5H, ABSTRACT 30, P. HARRIS SURVEY, LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. THE APPLICANT SEEKS A SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPING A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT. Acting Vice Chairperson Dorsett opened the public hearing at 6:05 P.M. A. STAFF PRESENTATION Masood Malik presented staffs report and answered questions from the Commission. The applicant, Scott Rodriquez, seeks a special conditional use permit for the purpose of constructing a new home with a 6,000 sq. ft. garage in a Planned Unit Development zone in the 800 block of McCabe Rd. On December Planning and Zoning Comn0on Minutes of January 15, 2004 1. Page 2 4, 2003, the Zoning Board of Adjustment granted Mr. Rodriquez a Variance to construct an accessory structure in excess of 2,000 sq. ft. Public notices were mailed to 14 surrounding property owners. The City received one response in favor and one opposed to the request. B. PROPONENTS Scott Rodriquez, 15727 Parksley Dr., Houston, TX, addressed the Commission. The Commission asked about screening along the back property line. Mr. Rodriquez was agreeable to planting additional screening in the future if it becomes necessary, but feels there is currently enough natural vegetation in place. When asked if the facade of the accessory building would match the house, he said it would not. C. OPPONENTS None IV. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Dorsett closed the public hearing at 6:20 P.M. V. CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING SPECIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #SCU03-004. Motion by Ross Moms to recommend to City Council, approval of Special Conditional Use Permit #SCU03-004 with the following conditions: ■ Accessory building must be located a minimum of thirty -feet (30') behind the rear of the primary structure, as required by the City's Code of Ordinances. ■ Assure that the proposed structure is not visible from the neighboring residential properties to the south. ■ Ensure that tree line will be preserved for at least 100' from the side and 150' from the rear property line, as shown on the site plan with a building setback being the same. ■ Roofed -over structures on the property do not accumulatively exceed the maximum forty percent (40%) lot coverage. ■ Additional development at site shall be subject to filing a new application for Special Conditional Use Permit. ■ Check into the feasibility of having an accessory structure look architecturally similar to the house. ■ No livestock shall be allowed at the property. Second by Paul Berner. The motion carried. Planning and Zoning Comnan Minutes of January 15, 2004 Page 3 Ayes: Morris, Berner, Finch, Barrera, Linscomb, Lawler, and Dorsett Nays: None Abstain: None (Alternate No. 1 Hal Lawler voted. in place of the regular Vice -Chairperson Dottie Kaminski; Alternate No. 2 Ross Morris voted in place of Ralph Dorsett; and Ralph Dorsett voted as the Acting Vice Chairperson.) VI. CONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FAIRMONT PARK EAST BUSINESS PARK (UNRESTRICTED RESERVES 2, 3, 4, 5, AND 6) ALONG FAIRMONT PARKWAY. Mr. Malik presented staffs report and outlined staffs recommendations for approval. The applicant, Eddie Gray, seeks Preliminary Plat approval for the proposed Fairmont Park East Business Park to be located in the 10400 block of Fairmont Parkway. Staffs recommendations are as follows: ■ Provide a controlled access easement for unrestricted reserves 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 along Fairmont Parkway. The driveways should be limited to 2-3. ■ Submit a final plat along with all applicable documents. ■ Submit construction drawings showing water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. ■ Provide covenants, conditions or restrictions for the proposed business park. ■ Secure a joint driveway to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd. utilizing Dollar General's access drive. Eddie Gray addressed the Commission. In response to staffs recommendations, Mr. Gray suggested the following: ■ Consider allowing at least one driveway for ingress/egress. for each of the commercial lots. ■ Consider requiring the placement of driveways be identified at the site plan stage instead of the platting stage. ■ Consider accepting at platting stage, schematic drawings instead of construction drawings, showing water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. ■ Covenants, conditions, or restrictions, were not anticipated since lots are individually owned. ■ Dollar General should not be required to share a joint driveway for access from Farrington Blvd. to the rear of all of the commercial properties. Interim Planning Director Nick Finan responded to Mr. Gray's comments and offered possible scenarios for reducing the driveways along Fairmont Parkway. Acting Vice -Chairperson Dorsett suggested a driveway to the rear next to Dollar General's rear drive onto Farrington. Planning and Zoning Comnton • Minutes of January 15, 2004 Page 4 Mr. Gray also suggested a common driveway alongside the Dollar General driveway to access the rear of all the properties, but also thought there should be at least one driveway each for the tracts on Fairmont Parkway. Decker McKim stated these lots are separate entities, not a strip center development. He noted a cross easement between all the tracts might help reduce the volume of traffic that would access the properties from Fairmont Pkwy. Motion by Nick Barrera to approve the Preliminary Plat for Fairmont Park East Business (Unrestricted Reserves 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) with the following conditions: ■ Provide a controlled access easement for unrestricted reserves 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 along Fairmont Parkway. The driveways should be limited to 2-3. ■ Developer to work with staff and look into common access limiting driveways on Fairmont Parkway. Check with mortgage companies' lending practices for properties that share access. ■ Submit a final plat along with all applicable documents. ■ Submit construction drawings showing water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. ■ Provide covenants, conditions or restrictions for the proposed business park. ■ Secure a driveway easement to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd. Second by Kirby Linscomb. The motion carried. Ayes: Barrera, Linscomb, Berner, Finch, Lawler, Morris, and Dorsett Nays: None Abstain: None VII. CONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FAIRMONT PARK EAST, SECTION 12. Mr. Malik presented staffs report and outlined staffs recommendation for approval of a preliminary plat for a 15.655 acre tract located along both sides of Farrington Blvd. south of Fairmont Pkwy. The property is currently zoned General Commercial. The applicant, Eddie Gray, addressed the Commission. Mr. Gray, the Commission, and staff, discussed various aspects relating to the plat. Motion by Paul Berner to approve the Preliminary Plat for Fairmont Park East, Section 12 with the following conditions: ■ A zone change request must be approved prior to filing the Final Plat. ■ Construction drawings shall indicate off -site drainage improvements to ensure proper drainage of the adjacent commercial property and residential subdivision. Planning and Zoning ComnSon Minutes of January 15, 2004 J Page 5 ■ The developer shall be responsible for installation of sidewalks along both sides of all public streets within the subdivision and along the east and west right-of- way line of Farrington Blvd. to the end of the subdivision line. ■ Access to Commercial Reserve 1 along Farrington should be shared with rear common access that exits on Farrington for commercial reserves along Fairmont Parkway. ■ Provide an easement for a driveway along the south portion of the commercial reserve and lots 19, 20, and 21, for access to the commercial tracts along Fairmont Parkway. ■ Resolve the alignment issue for the two points of access for the subdivision off Farrington Blvd. prior to any request for an esplanade cut. Second by Hal Lawler. The motion carried. Ayes: Berner, Lawler, Barrera, Linscomb, Finch, Morris, and Dorsett Nays: None Abstain: None Vill. CONSIDER MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN FOR THE PORT OF HOUSTON AUTHORITY'S PRE -CHECK FACILITY ALONG BARBOUR'S CUT BLVD. Mr. Malik presented staffs report. The Port of Houston Authority seeks approval of a Major Development Site Plan for a proposed truck pre -check facility to be located along Barbour's Cut Blvd. Mr. Malik answered questions from the Commission. Motion by Hal Lawler to approve the Major Development Site Plan for the Port of Houston Authority's proposed truck pre -check facility with the following condition: ■ Prior to use or occupancy, a subdivision plat for the entire 20.7-acre tract shall be submitted for approval by the City before filing with Hams County. Second by Ross Morris. The motion carried. Ayes: Lawler, Moms, Berner, Barrera, Linscomb, Finch, and Dorsett Nays: None Abstain: None IX. STAFF REPORTS Mr. Finan informed the Commission the City would be forming a team to conduct interviews for the vacant City Planner position. Commission Members interested in participating should contact Mr. Finan as soon as possible. X. ADJOURN Acting Vice Chairperson Dorsett adjourned the meeting at 7:45 P.M. Planning and Zoning ComMon • Minutes of January 15, 2004 Page 6 Submitted by, Peggy Planning Secretary � Approved on this � day of C i" , 2004. of _w4fers Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson F7 Zone Change Request #R04-001 Exhibits A.Commission's Action Request B. Aerial Map C. Zoning Map D. Staff Report E. Turn Lanes @ SH. 146 (letter and maps) F. Application G. Proposed Site Plan H. Public Notice Responses Zone Change Request #R04-001 Planning and Zoning Col February 19, 2004 0 Location of Proposed Change 2501 State Highway 146 Legal Description of Proposed Zoning 3.0 acres being TR A2, W.P. Harris Survey, A-30 Applicant James Elmore on behalf of Ben F. Weems owner Present Zoning Planned Unit Development(PUD) Requested Zoning General Commercial (GC) Acreage to be Rezoned 3.00 acres Surrounding Zoning North PUD East PUD South PUD West SH 146, PUD Land Use Commercial Activity Proposed Convenience Store Summary: • The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this property from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to General Commercial (GC). • Purpose of zone change is to allow convenience store at this location. • The reason for the zone change is that the applicant cannot meet the minimum project size of five (5) acres in PUD. • The subject property is a part of a General Plan and SCUP earlier approved by City Council for the proposed development of La Porte Golf Course Community. • The approved General Plan proposed single-family dwellings and a commercial reserve at the northeast of McCabe road and SH 146. • The submitted application reveals convenience store and a lease space. While, the site plan shows truck fueling and a drive through facility besides convenience store. The applicant has confirmed these proposed uses. • Truck fueling & drive through facility are conditional use per Code of • Ordinances. TxDOT is in the process of acquiring the western portion of this tract for northbound turn lane along SH 146. But, the owner has been non- responsive to date. • Driveways plan also conflicts with the Commission's recent policy on controlled access and a design of SH 146 for safety reasons. • Rezoning of the property would go against the PUD zone, which the intent was to have a comprehensive view. Recommendation: • The effect of the change may have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties and public infrastiucture. Staff recommends denial of the zone change request subject to the following provisions: • There is no reason to change the PUD zoning designation. The justification of PUD zoning assigned appears to be still valid today. • Integrity of Planned Unit Development will be in jeopardy. • The area is earmarked for turn lanes off SH 146 along frontage road at Wharton Weems Blvd. • There is no need of creating another commercial reserve at this location. If it is to be commercial, it should in concert with PUD. • The subject property has been divided by metes and bounds description in violation of the Development Ordinance. • Driveways layout conflicts with SH 146 & need to limit access at Wharton Weems from safely standpoint • There is a similar use shown at the northeast corner of McCabe Road at SH 146 in the recently approved plan and Special Conditional Use Permit Commission's Action: • recommend approval of the zone change as requested, • recommend denial of the zone change as requested, and • recommend approval of a modified version of the zone change. -AHIBIT A. Ik V Y. fl ,X. A-, a MOW --WHARTON 1TVEEMS BLVD. V.; ... ... . .... ... . .. .. .... Alt . 24 I. 4.: ilk 11 r-ac k. LEGEND PROPOSED' REZONE REQUEST # R-04-001 TRACT A2 - ( 3.00 -ACRES WiP. HARRIS-ABST.-30 PROPOSED -AREA OF REZONE f Staff Report February 19, 2004 Zone Change Request #R 04-001 Requested -by: James Elmore on behalf of Ben F. Weems (owner) Requested for: TR A2 (3.00 acre), W. P. Harris Survey, A 30, LaPorte, Harris County, Texas. Locations: Wharton Weems Blvd. @ S.H. 146 Present Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Requested Zoning: General Commercial (GC) Background: The subject tract comprises of a 3 acres of land out of W. P. Harris Survey, A-30, LaPorte, Harris County, Texas. The property is located at the southeastern corner of Wharton Weems Boulevard and State Highway 146. The property became part of the City of La Porte in the late 1950s. The present Zoning District Map was adopted on January 26, 1987. As a part of this process, zoning classifications were assigned to the various tracts and subdivisions. The zoning designation assigned to this tract was Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). Currently, the subject tract is a part of proposed La Porte Golf Course Community, a 150± acres of land located in the W.P. Harris Survey, A-30, Harris County, Texas. The Planning and Zoning Commission at their August 27, 2003 meeting held a public hearing and recommended approval of the General Plan and SCUP. The General Plan and Special Conditional Use Permit was approved by City Council on October 13, 2003. The overall project consists of single-family residential, multi -family, and commercial developments. The general plan already shows commercial development at the northeast comer of McCabe Road and State Highway 146. The City was under the belief that the prior submittal was a comprehensive document of all the property owners. Staff was unaware that a 3-acre tract was withheld from the sale. The development in a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district requires that a General Plan and a Special Conditional Use Permit be submitted and processed simultaneously. In addition, the tract of land for which a planned unit development — commercial or industrial project is proposed, shall contain not less than five acres per Code of Ordinances. Here, the project is proposed for 3-acre of land. So, in lieu of special regulations and procedures established for Planned Unit Development, the .611 Zone Change #R 04-001 P & Z Feb 19, 2004 Page 2 of 4 applicant is requesting a zone change. However, the proposed development is not in accordance with the spirit of the current PUD zoning district regulations. Analysis: In considering this request, Staff reviewed the Comprehensive Plan elements as a guideline. The specific issues considered are as follows: Land Use — Review of the approved General Plan and SCUP shows that a 150-acre tract for proposed La Porte Golf Course Community was envisioned as developing as low -density residential with a small corner for commercial use. Staff evaluated the proposed commercial use for compatibility with the firhrre adjacent residential uses. The General Plan shows, a 1.531 acres (66,706 sq.ft.) commercial tract is already reserved at the northeast comer of McCabe Road and SH. 146. There is no need of creating another commercial tract at this comer. Furthermore, it will be against the requirements of the zoning district regulations. Transportation — The tract gains access using Wharton Weems Boulevard, an arterial with 100' ROW, which provides access to the State Highway 146. The City and TxDOT have worked together to promote two turn lanes off SH 146 frontage road at Wharton Weems Boulevard (letter attached for ready reference). The TxDOT negotiated with the owner to purchase the land for this purpose. But, the owner has been non -responsive to date. There were also discussions to ensure that traffic control devices are placed properly to encourage smooth traffic flow and control speed at this intersection (maps attached). In addition, limited driveways are suggested to minimize impedance of traffic flow along these major thoroughfares. The submitted site plan shows two driveways each along Wharton Weems Blvd. and SH 146. The driveways plan conflict with the SH 146 and need to limit access at Wharton Weems Blvd. from a safety standpoint. Furthermore, it will negatively impact on the local thoroughfare network and aesthetic appearance considerations. Utilities — Staff reviewed existing facilities and services available to the area of proposed development. The water is readily available to the property. A 16" waterline runs north south along easterly right-of-way line of State Highway 146. The fire protection is adequate. However, sanitary sewer is not available to the property. The nearest sanitary sewer service facility is a lift station along McCabe Road near mobile home park. It is approximately 2500 ft. away from the subject property. Per Section 74-3 of the Ordinances, any property located within 200 ft. of an existing sewer system must tie-in with such City sewer system. Whereas, the applicant is proposing a septic tank that could create an unsanitary condition within or across the property. Zone Change #R 04-001 P & Z Feb 19, 2004 Page 3 of 4 Drainage — This property lies within the Taylor Bayou Watershed. There are not sufficient channel improvements to directly receive storm water runoff from this project. Storm water drainage and detention is also an issue that will be carefully reviewed as a project develops. As with other infrastructure issues, it will be the developer's responsibility to provide any stuctures, or improvements necessary to accommodate the storm water accumulation and runoff. Truck Fueling & Drive Through Facility — The submitted application shows a convenience store and a lease space are proposed at this site. After a conversation with the applicant, it is revealed that truck fueling facility and a drive through restaurant are included in the plan The applicant's submitted site plan also shows a drive through facility and truck fueling center to be located to the north and south of the proposed convenience store respectively. However, these proposed uses are listed as a conditional use per Code of Ordinances. The Special Conditional Use Permit (SCUP) shall be applicable and City Council approval will be required in this regards. Conclusion & Recommendations: It is staff s opinion that creating a small isolated commercial zone at this location would run contrary to the intent of the PUD zoning district and could well compromise the viability of the remaining undeveloped Planned Unit Development (PUD) as well as approved General Plan & SCUP. Additionally, there has been no improvements/changes to the tract in question or surrounding area that warrants either a rezoning or an amendment in this regard. Staff recommends denial of the zone change request subject to the following concerns: • There is no reason to change the PUD zoning designation. The justification of PUD zoning assigned appears to be still valid today. • Integrity of Planned Unit Development will be in jeopardy. • The area is earmarked for turn lanes off SH 146 along frontage road at Wharton Weems Blvd. • There is no need of creating another commercial reserve at this location. If it is to be commercial, it should in concert with PUD. • The subject property has been divided by metes and bounds description in violation of the Development Ordinance. • Driveways layout conflicts with SH 146 & need to limit access at Wharton Weems from safety standpoint. • There is a similar use shown at the northeast corner of McCabe Road at SH 146 in the recently approved plan and Special Conditional Use Permit. • • Zone Change #R 04-001 P & Z Feb 19, 2004 Page 4 of 4 Actions available to the Commission are as follows: • recommend approval of the zone change as requested, • recommend denial of the zone change as requested, and • recommend approval of a modified version of the zone change. �'EXAS July 29, 2002 Mr. Ben Weems i Attention: Susan Weems P.O. Box 188 Lafayette, Colorado 80026 Re: Property Acquisition: Proposed Turn Lanes SH146 at Wharton Weems Boulevard Dear Mr. Weems: The City and TxDOT have worked together to promote two turn lanes off SH146 feeder road at Wharton Weems Boulevard. It is my understanding that TxDOT needs to acquire a small parcel of land from you needed to install the northbound turn lane. I also believe that TxDOT has attempted to negotiate a fair price for property needed. Please understand that this project is extremely important to the community from a safety standpoint. I urge you to complete the transaction with TxDOT. Sincerely, John Joerns Assistant City Manager JJ/ml 604 W. Fairmont Pkwy. o La Porte, Texas 77571 o (281) 471-5020. +1 e ............... ........... ....................... .............. ....... . ....... ................... ........... ... . ............. ...... .......... ....... ....... ................................. ............... .................. .......... ..... ............. .... .................. ...... % ,,...,,,,.,,,,...,,,.,,,. ................... % ............ ...... ..................... I n I et ....... ...... .........:... : ..xmx:+mx:ax, .. ........ NTq6E.. 1`........................................ - ...................pqp .�.. ..:.... ....... msx,emaxxv O In I et ••••••- M� BEGIN PROJECT •••••• CSJ 0389-05-089 € :......................... • STA. 304+00 ............................. ............... ...... N LP .............. _ - unmuuununwe LAJ L% 2 305+� 00 �- SH 146 O O Ljj cNv '�- -'� - ENO CSJ PROJECT 0389-05-089 M STA. 310+00 0 31p'=00 y n co (0Cr W .. Cr ;,,,,,,,,,,,,, - _.... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"-",,=,x,u,,,,,,_.......... •.,...... ....... ......, .,.., ......-.......,............................................... :x,a,,,.,.:,ax r ax,. x:x,,,.a ............... _ -•_ •• . - ....... _..... =, ., Intersection (To ng ..... ...............,, "" •••••••••,.„,,,, Be Installed By Others) BEGIN LANE TRANSITION 290• . --� STA. 304+19. 2 �• -. _ - k,•N"" ;:.,,:,,,,ih Lighting x W END LANE TRANSITION (ToIntersection � Be Installed By Others) • € 3 C= ,•°'"����-�..,,, TF STA. 307+09. 2 a:'`s�� 200' ` ? p J - 3 i N. T. S. Provided by RATNALA & BAHL, INC. Account No. 8012 - 1 - 7 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ® 2003 TxDOT ROW LAYOUT SH 146 O'WHARTON WEEMS (RIGHT TURN LANE) FED. RD. RD. DIV. STATE PROJECT NO. HIGHWAY 6 TX NF_( ) __ _ SH 146 DISTRICT COUNTY CONTR )LISI.�'.T ' E SHEET HOUSTON HARR I S 1 038, • --' ' - to .......... ...... .... . ..... ....... ........... I . .......... : , . . ....... ....... ... . ......... . ............ ............... % ................ ........... ...... ...... ....... ..... ;. ................. ..... ...... ....... ....... .... ............... .... ......... 4. ....... ....... .1 ....... Inlet . ........... % .................. .......... ....... ....... ....... % .......... 5H FRONT'- ­ APE ROA& .................... ...... . ....... ....... 11 ........................ ...... ........... Inlet ......... ....... BEGIN PROJECT C SJ 0389-05-089 • STA. 304+00 '6 LP 305.0.00 SH 146 V. r BEGIN PROPOSED G" CONC. CURB DOWEL) ................ DETAIL A ........ ...... ....... .. .... (Typical) Exist. .... ...... ......... . ..... Ty A. Inlet ............... . . Exist. Exist ........ . ........... ... ............. .. ... ...... . ..... ..... .......... 48_" RCP 24 " RCP ­ ...... Ex i st. R. 0. W ....... Exist '�48" RCP . ....... MH Ty ..................... ReE x i 0'7' .... ................. . . ......... mo e Exist.Ty.-c Inlet 18" RCP .... ............................. . ....... Full -Depth Repo i r ....... ....... Intersection Lighting ....... ....... (To Be Installed -BY Others) BEGIN LANE TRANSITION 290, STA. 304+19.2 Intersection Lighting END LANE TRANSITION (To Be Installed By Ot'hers) STA. 307+09.2 Install 200, Ty C Inlet Install 18" RCP (12') Lateral A SAW CUT 6" FROM 50 Rod. EXIST. FACE OF EXIST. CURB/.. CUR END PROPOSED 6" CONC. 7 . . .. ..... ...... CURB (DOWEL) 50 STA. 309+ 2 MIN. FACE OF NEW CURB 40 Work Area DETAIL A N. T. S. LIMITS OF LJ CONC.'PVMT. 3 )0 ................ ............... ............ END PROJECT CSJ 0389-05- STA. 310.+00 LP Remov 6" Curb (545') (1 no i dent a ...... . . .. to item 104-501) DETAIL A T y p Qa:j;:)K z W %J W W T F 7 > co NOTES: 1. Newly installed RCP shall match soffit elevation of existing RCP. 2. Newly installed RCP shall be sloped to &a i n. S I ape sha I I not exceed 0. 5%. 3. See Detail A for minimum pavement width details. ............ 4.. Barbed wire fence to be removed ....... from Sta. 304+19 to Sta. 309+50 This will not be paid directly but will be considered incidental to item 112, "Subgrode Widening.". 0 0 oe 91 LLJ U Z LLI Uj LL LLI OF XX 00' 00 00­"­1 ......................... JEFFREY E. MARTINEZ ................................ -a85516 o, G IS T .......... XXX IONAL The peal appearing on this document was authorized by Jeffrey E. Martinez, P.E. 85516, on Januaru 27, 2003. N. T. S. whartonRTfl.dicin mmwwm.� ID • L_ 12' VL EXIST 6" CURB ........ny.•...........n......... ......... ............ ...A.... ....... La 33' ROADWAY Z EXIST 6" LIME TREATED SUBGRADE \ EXIST 6" CEMENT TREATED BASE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION EXIST 9" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JRCP) N. B. & S. B. FRONTAGE ROADS SH 146 STA. 304+19.2 TO STA. 309+48.95 12' *1 EXIST 6" CURB 33' ROADWAY �..............•.......•..... A................................... •......._.. ................... •..............i...........� EXIST. 9" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JRCP) EXIST. 6" LIME TREATED SUBGRADE (3-11' LANES) 6" Offset- EXIST. 6" CURB ..........................................•. �......:....w.�..........t...................e....• �.............�................................ . a.. .........a.........•.............•. .., ..... . ,� 15' Usual Limits of Pay Lime Treated Subgrade (Item 2601 Cement Treated Base (Item 2761 13' Usual * Limits of Pay JRCP (Item 360) 12. 5' 11' 6" DOWEL CURB PlATCB EXIST. CROSS SLOPE off, 20' Limits of Pay Seeding (Item 164) 1' Curb -Offset EXIST. 9" EXIST 9" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JRCP) CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JRCP) ZEXIST 6" CEMENT TREATED BASE EXiSPROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION LIME TTREATED SUBGRADE EXIST 6" LIME TREATED SUBGRADE N. B. & S. B. FRONTAGE ROADS $H 146 SEE DETAIL "A' PROP. 9" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JRCP) STA. 304 + 19.2 TO STA. 309+48. 95 NOTES: * STA. 304 + 19. 2 TO 307+09. 29 VARIES 0' TO 1 3' + PROP. 6" CEMENT TREATED BASE — PROP. �"OF' Tq 1l PAVEMENT SHALL BE #4 BARS AT 6" LIME TREATED SUBGRADE 1. REINFORCING STEEL FOR CONCRETE '' S' It (No Lime Treated Subgrode Within 12" C-C (LONGITUDINAL) AND #4 SAW CUTTING IS Poo *�1 Taper Length, Sta.304+19 To Sta.307+09. BARS AT 24" C-C (TRANSVERSE). INCIDENTAL TO Use 6" Cement Treated Bose.) 2. THE EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL BE ITEM 104, LIMITS OF / JEFFREY E. MARTINEZ SAW CUT AND REMOVED TO ESTABLISH "REMOVING CONCRETE" CONC. REMOVAL /• • • ;• • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •/ NEAT LINES. ALL SAW CUTTING 1' ,1 8551 6• i REQUIRED TO REMOVE -EXISTING A'. / CONCRETE WILL NOT BE PAID DIRECTLY 'Q BUT WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL '1 �1��''' FGISTER�• o - o 0 0 � Ss' ZONAL EN— SCALE: 1 = 5' . TO ITEM 104 "REMOVING CONCRETE o S •• (PVMT) ". �'. Q ���� TEXAS DEPARTMENT ® 2003 TxDOT 3. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED FROM PRIOR The seal appearing on this document Was JOBS WITHIN THESE PROJECTS DOWEL BAR authorized b TYPICAL SE LIMITS THAT THIS LIME TREATED SUB- y Jeffrey E. Martinez, P.E. GRADE IS DEGRADED AND CAN BE 85516, on January 27, 2003. SH 146 AT WHARTOI REMOVED DURING EXCAVATION. THIS WORK WILL NOT BE PAID FOR DIRECTLY DETAIL .o p �o FED. RD. STATE FEDER BUT WILL BE CONSIDERED IN (. _ See JRCP Detail Standards for spacing 8 le DtvRD. TO ITEM 112, SUBGRADE WIDENIIDENINGG"".. ngtnsl 6 TX Backfiil is Incidential to Item 112, "Subgrode Widening" whortonrtbl.dgn HOUSTON I HARRIS 0389 1 05 089 INDEX OF SHEETS rsEE SHEET 21 STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PLANS OF PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.: NH ( ) CONTROL NO-- 0389-05-089 HARRIS COUNTY SH 146 NET LENGTH OF PROJECT: ROADWAY • 600.00 FT. ■ 0.114 Ml. END PROJECT STA. 310+00.0 CSJ: 0389-05-089 REF. MARKER 494+1.405 M. P. 2.225 BEGIN PROJECT STA. 304+00.0 CSJ: 0389-05-089 REF. MARKER = 494+1.519 M. P. 2.339 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MISCELLANEOUS WORK CONSISTING OF INSTALLATION OF RIGHT TURN LANE LIMITS: AT BS 146D (WHARTON-WEEMS) SPECIFICATIONS ADOPTED BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MARCH 1, 1993, AND THE SPECIFICATION ITEMS LISTED AND DATED AS FOLLOWS SHALL GOVERN ON THIS PROJECT: REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS, FEDERAL -AID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (FORM FHWA 1273, DECEMBER 1993). © 2003 by Texas Department of Transportation: (512)416-2055, all rights reserved LOCATION MAP NTS EXCEPTIONS: NONE EQUATIONS: NONE RR CROSSING: NONE LOOP 410 VICINITY MAP NTS j PROJECT LOCATION ® 2003 , Texas Department of Transportation SUBMITTED FOR LETTING: AREA ENGINEER RECOMMENDED FOR LETTING: DISTRICT ENGINEER APPROVED FOR LETTING: E:::= DIRECTOR, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS DIVISION APPROVED FOR LETTING: DIRECTOR, DESIGN DIVISION • City of La Porte Esw6lished 1892 Data Indpt No.: �) sit$ Pka () Mlnw Devebpwt MW 1?kA () ► Skits a }c4sma Pin () dessw6imd in Addmr 309 WITt saWlt'ar Dom: i! `s10A Ph. 1 `3-"524-2U® gum�._r ! ,.....=d.®. Owm's NO= sea I. gems '10364 Arbptbe 1A04 AMMr �U erjta- e0102"ar. ��► - 25i..+r�rol�i i+ri�s .ors 3.00 AC 91 CarnOT Vems i Xwy 146 (4 Pmpand gas. CDnwmieA&e Stria With Lasa! space OFFICE USE ONLY 1) (a)& 2: �ltin� - (b) PuM Ha6WMtg. Rcodaoaa: AppUmat Notified of Dates): ( ' 159 I1t. () 2ad Ift. Adg Pwpcny OW=s Nam: 2) City Coww : a) R9gWv (b) Public H=AWmtg. Appmved t) AdaPtod by Amtrdment W..01501 - SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 40' IL Q r I phone 713. 524. 2880 fax 713. 524. 9803 toll free 1. 888. 524. 2880 M D 0 z Nti co X C ) T �- W XZ 000 005 v! Ii Z) 0 ''Z^ v, - U of Z. F— w EL w � w cr_ 'r" - U 0 Z � ru Z L= W W f- W > .Q IL 0. U DRAWN BY: H. FLORES DATE: 01/15/2004 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" SHEET: SP Fairmont Park East, Section Eleven (Final Plat) Exhibits A. Commission's Action Request B. Aerial Map C. Zoning Map D. Staff Report E. Application F. Final Plat Fairmont Park East, Section Eleven (Final Plat) Planning and Zoning Cossion • February 19, 2004 Location of Proposed Subdivision Myrtle Creek Drive and Spencer Highway Legal Description W.M. Jones Survey, Abstract 482 Harris Count Applicant Eddie V. Gray Present Zoning Low Density Residential -1 Requested Zoning Low Density Residential (R 1) Acreage to be considered 19.3756 acres Surrounding Zoning North Low Density Residential (R 1) East Low Density Residential (R 1) South Spencer Highway & GC West General Commercial Land Use Map Mid to High density Residential Activity Proposed Single-family residential dwellings Summary: On April 14, 2003, City Council approved the Commission's recommendation and established Ordinance #1501-YY rezoning of 19.3756 acres of land along the east and west sides of Myrtle Credo Drive just north of Spencer Highway from General Commercial (GC), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and High Density Residential (R-3) to Low Density Residential (R 1) for proposed development of Fairmont Park East Section Eleven. At the Commission's October 16, 2003 meeting, the preliminary plat for Fairmont Park East, Section Eleven was approved with conditions. As a part of the Commission's conditional approval of the preliminary plat, the applicant submitted a rezone request for unrestricted reserve along Spencer Highway. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing at their November 20, 2003 meeting and recommended it to City Council. City Council approved the zone change request at their January 12, 2004 meeting. Staff reviewed the final plat with all required documentation and construction drawings and found it be in substantial compliance with all applicable regulation of the ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the final plat subject to the Recommendation: following provisions: • All construction improvements are complete at site. • Furnish approval letter from the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) for the drop structure on Big Island Slough. • Sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of all public streets and along detention area to connect block 2 and block 3. • Sidewalks are constructed along north side of Spencer Highway on both directions leading to the Big Island Slough on the east and towards west end of the subdivision. • Add a note on the face of the plat that maintenance of 20' utility easement, drop structure to Big Island Slough, and the detention basin will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowner Association. • Payment of $319.41 shall be made to the City for street sign installation. • Payments shall be made to the City in the amount of $2760.00 and $2355.84 for twelve (12) streetlights installation and 1-year service cost. • Payment of $10,850.00 shall be made to the City in lieu of parkland dedication. Action Required by Approval of the Final Plat withholding signature and recordation until above are the Commission: complied. This will aWorize the developer to begin construction of subdivision improvements. Disapproval of the Final Plat and supporting documents as filed. This will require the developer to file a new Final Plat with the required documents. zA HIBI i' A Acj Ok IWO- 60, IL� rr a , b trf• � �Y:• G �. � � �y.� +may �, 7:,� , L r.�. + 3 LOW - �-^ +�'- v i',, 'f ��r�g�� vi���-',`� rp 1:t�i'. ` � '[•'�1T"lY1�rRr� �� rrv. r`; k �> s� �s�i� D7w% � i! r �/ /'� 1. �.�ja � y�-, � • . �'��`ir ti +,�" rF•. ayi,"G '�Iw s_ �.'A` w ��,rJ.. f.� ,.:. y ,P '",r. �,� J. �,. v .-a�+p�',r ° �' � r {' a � ..,fir °' -• � "� 'y _.� �,A'�J � ,, �.�yr�o'`f �p�'�%%i F. �r. •' �,h i �Yt "3 ✓ 7• �A✓� �Y°� ����I� �� ������' ,/}f'�/�J/�/ I� � n� J 1 d l ✓ Y � _ t" sPEKGsa��+�Hvv�aY p 1 ^� } • L4 �• '�lt•fAi � C. br:16 I gU CT111A1 01 Al Staff Report Fairmont Park East, Section Eleven February 19, 2004 Final Plat Requested Action: Consideration of Final Plat for Fairmont Park East, Section Eleven Requested Bv: Mr. Eddie V. Gray, Trustee Requested For: A 19.3756 acres of land out of W. J. Payne Subdivision in the William M. Jones Survey, Abstract No. 482, Harris County, Texas. Present Zoning: Low -Density Residential (R 1) Requested Use: Residential Subdivision — (Single Family Dwellings) Background: At the October 16, 2003 meeting, the Commission approved the preliminary plat for Fairmont Park East, Section 11 with the following conditions: • Ensure positive drainage along north property line. The construction drawings shall indicate off -site drainage improvements to ensure grade elevations do not conflict with the adjacent Creekmont Subdivision. • Show 30' utility and landscaping reserve on both sides of the intersection at King William Drive and Spencer Highway. As a result, the property lines for lots 1-5 of block 3 and lots 1-7 of block 1 shall be reconfigured. • The developer is responsible for installation of sidewalks along both sides of all public streets within the subdivision and along east and west right-of-way line of Myrtle Creek Drive. • Sidewalks shall be installed around the detention area along King William Drive and Spencer Highway up to east and west end of the subdivision line. • Reconfigure lot 1 of block 1. Provide screening around Southwestern Bell's utility facility. • Unrestricted Reserve No. 1 along Spencer Highway must be rezoned prior to the filing of the Final Plat. Earlier, the Commission recommended to City Council Rezone Request #R03-001. On April 14, 2003, City Council affirmed the Commission's recommendation and established Ordinance #1501-YY rezoning of 19.3756 acres of land along the east and west sides of Myrtle Creek Drive just north of Spencer Highway from General Commercial (GC), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and High Density Residential (R 3) to Low Density Fairmont Park East, Section El e relsr►al Plat 2/19/04 - P & Z Meeting Page 2 of 4 Residential (R-1) for proposed development of Fairmont Park East Section Eleven. As a part of the Commission's conditional approval of the preliminary plat, the applicant submitted a rezone request. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing at their November 20, 2003 meeting and recommended it to City Council. City Council approved the zone change request at their January 12, 2004 meeting. So, the applicant fulfilled last of the above conditions. The applicant submitted a Final Plat for Fairmont Park East Section Eleven, a residential subdivision off Myrtle Creek Drive and Spencer Highway. As shown on the plat, there are 4 blocks and 62 lots with two points of access into the subdivision at Myrtle Creek Drive and Spencer Highway. Analysis: Section 4.03 and Appendix D of the City's Development Ordinance establish review criteria for major subdivisions. Staff also used criteria in the City's Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan to review this project. Land Use — The project's proposed residential use conforms to the character of the surrounding land uses and the R 1 zoning district. Properties adjacent to the proposed subdivision are overwhelmingly residential with some commercial developments along Spencer Highway. An Unrestricted Reserve (0.55 acre), at the southwest corner of the subdivision along Spencer Highway, is zoned General Commercial. As per Commission's action on the preliminary plat, the developer has provided a 30' landscaping easement along Spencer Highway just south of lot 1 of Blocks 1 and 3. As a result, the property lines for lots 1-5 of block 3 and lots 1-7 of block 1 were reconfigured. The purpose here is to ensure that the proposed housing units are located at adequate distance from the intersection with Spencer Highway. Transportation/Interior Circulation _ The proposed subdivision is to be located just north of Spencer Highway (100' ROW) and along east and west of Myrtle Creek Drive (80' ROW), a primary access to the Creekmont Subdivision. Section Eleven east & west have accesses on Myrtle Creek Drive as well. The proposed subdivision shows internal streets with 50' of public right-of-way. Spencer Highway, a primary arterial, should easily accommodate the traffic generated by this development. The proposed development is in conformance with the City's Development Ordinance and the Thoroughfare Plan. Sidewalks - The developer shall be responsible to construct sidewalks along both sides of all public streets within the subdivision and along detention area to connect block 2 and block 3 at King William Drive. Staff recommends sidewalks along east and west of Myrtle Creek Drive and along Spencer Highway up to Big Island Slough on the east and towards west end of the subdivision line. Fairmont Park East, Section Elevenal Plat 2/19/04 - P & Z Meeting Page 3 of 4 Parks and Recreation — Section 12.0 of the City's Development Ordinance requires the developer to provide on site open space and recreational park or fees in lieu of parkland to the City. Per the Ordinance, an area of land dedicated to the City for parkland purposes shall equal one acre for each 160 proposed dwelling units. This subdivision has 62 lots. Based on the above formula, the area required for parkland equals 16,880 sq.ft or 0.3875 acre. Therefore, money in lieu of parkland dedication ($175/lot) shall be applicable in this regard. Utilities — There are sufficient water and sewer facilities in the vicinity to provide services to this proposed development. The developer is responsible for providing all necessary public infrastructure to accommodate the subdivision's water and sanitary sewer needs. The design and construction of all water and sewer systems shall be in conformance with the City's Development Ordinance and Public Improvement Criteria Manual (PICM). Drainage — Storm water design and management were the issues resolved carefully with the developer of the proposed subdivision. The proposed section is adjacent to Harbor Bay Apartments. A 20' drainage easement is secured which runs through the proposed subdivision and outfalling into the Big Island Slough. The developer agrees to allow the storm water runoff from the apartments to "pass through" the subdivision's detention pond. The detention area's size and capacity were reviewed to ensure that it will adequately serve the proposed development and accommodate the "pass through" storm water from the apartments. The developer provided all the necessary easements required for proper drainage. In addition easements were secured to provide access to the City's existing lift station in the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision. Staff also ensured that current changes in elevation will not impact the drainage of the adjacent Creekmont subdivision. Conclusion & Recommendations: Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and found it to be in accordance with the Development Ordinance of the City. Staff recommends approval subject to the listed items that will need to be addressed prior to the recordation of the Final Plat: • All construction improvements are complete at site. • Furnish approval letter from the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) for the drop structure on Big Island Slough. e Sidewalks shall be installed along both sides of all public streets and along detention area to connect block 2 and block 3. • Sidewalks are constructed along north side of Spencer Highway on both directions leading to the Big Island Slough on the east and towards west end of the subdivision. Fairmont Park East, Section Elev*nw Plat 2/19/04 — P & Z Meeting Page 4 of 4 • ® Add a note on the face of the plat that surface maintenance of 20' utility easement to Big Island Slough and detention basin will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowner Association. ® Reference of the above should also be noted in the subdivision's covenants and restrictions provided to be approved by the City Attorney. • Payment of $319.41 shall be made to the City for street sign installation. • Payments shall be made to the City in the amount of $2760.00 and $2355.84 for twelve (12) streetlights installation and 1-year service cost respectively. • Payment of $10,850.00 shall be made to the City in lieu of parkland dedication. Options available to the Commission are as follows: • Approval of the Final Plat withholding signature and recordation until the above are complied. This will authorize the developer to begin constriction of subdivision improvements. • Disapproval of the Final Plat and supporting documents as filed. This will require the developer to file a new Final Plat with the required documents. WI.V a,0 f-UUG 1-1%, uc•u! nii CITY FORTE PLAT/NIAJOR DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL - APPLICATION (All plat s1ibmittaii to be'reviewed and considered ` for presentation to the - Planning and Zoning Cosa nil5sion must be accompanied by this application and necessary documentation 9'isted . herein. Submittals will not be reviaered by staff without this application_) r HA Nu: Type of Submittal: General Plan L_) Preliminary Plat LJ r, uc OMC£ U92 DRILY DATE RE,-.mED: _1— 9— 0 4 FL' NNING a ZWM(; BI arrimr, DATE: Major Development Site Plan U . Final Plat (L) Date: 1/6/04 Contact Pemonta): L W. GArtrel]. da Phone: 409=935=2462 . Name of Proposed Development: Fairmont Park East, Section 11 Name of Developer: Eddie V. Gra , Trustee Phone; .281-=422-3677' Address of Developer: P. 0. Box 638, Baytown, Texas 77522 Number of Sections: Number of i~ots: Leval Description of Property: Shown on Plat Filing Fee: //-- Amount: Receipt Checks should be made payable Bo the.,.Cny of La Porte. List All Other Contact Persons: Address Phone F93t C. DOOCS2 PTICR or A 16.3915 ACHE TRAM or LAIRD Our Or Neon S AND P. "IBf.00B 00. 2 Or THE PAT" SotoIVISIOII, A SODDIVSBION IN RASSIS COUM, 'TEXAS Bs020030 at the Southwest coiner o! Let 1 in Black 1. In t Cr..krea"ubdlwi a I-. Section, Con. a Subdivisiwa is Harris Count1.S Tease. t e. according to th ecopa of o Semrd in Volur 279, 11■s ti ht e! county !-Let lying in the s way M. of myrtle Creak Driw, BO toot right of way, according to Veins 264, page 200 in the Ram. County Howard., THEME fro. eaid Seg1.si.g Point. Seat, along the South line of Cree2Mont Subdivision, d..tlou Ina, a distant. of 1094.90 test to a Point for tom.., THEME 502.52-30•2. a distance of 10.00 test to A point far Comet, TRIICB Hart, A distance of 20.00 toot to a point for comer in the East right of way line of a Harris County Flood Central 21a-1 Ito foot right of way. .0 pee deed -carded in Values,SSti, sego 351 1. the Harris Canty Named., .TJO1CN a2-9 the Meet right o[ war Ilea of .aid 11-Mi. County Flood Control Ra.e.et 802.$2'30•s, 693.82 East and 811•29-30•8. 163.67 Got to a Paint for corner in the Worth eight of way Ilse of Spencer Highway. 100 !act right of way, TZZWCR West, along the Worth right of way line eE Spence. Highway, ISO toot right of way, distant. of 16.33 fast to point for Comer, TRIMS aroued A Southwestern Hell T.1.Phoe. Treat, N11.29-30-W. 50.00 Cast. West 60.00 test and $12-29-30•3, 50.00 feat to a Point for Comer I. the North right of way lies of Spent.. Highway. 100 tact right of way, CREE-KA40NT Sul BDIVISIQN I SkTION i II I I' / 0=10'35'22" (�r--- --" L-153.40'L.s. T=76.92' /� LC=15318' /, � 20• U.E. I i A D.A.E. a= CB=S 25'S2'19" w\ 4 xuof�Bloc. y C.REEKMONT MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH (J B.L. 5 zs 26 / Alt (CFJ/N876918) �qg�s - / (�� - - - - - - - - - - f !v 0 •'° » y` ` ,D' D. . ; g PROPOSED e'�O wsTER LANE , � � __ (H 630596) 0=09'18'58" 17 1 6- 1 L=160.97' T=80.66' :^ a CB=N 26'30'45" E A eat /----------- -----------EA NO IF / / voQP �p?�G�� I 1 THEME fast, along the North rigbt of way 11ea of Spencer Highway 100 foot right at say, A Sincere of 390.77 Last to A Point Ior ..snarl THOICN North, • dietaneo of 336.00 loot to • point Co. care.., THEN:S Meat. . distance of 260.00 East to . point to. warn.., THEN" Earth, • distant. of 1t2.00 last t . . P.... for cam.r, TROMN Nast• a distance CC 669.19 loot to • Point lee cornea le the East right of way 1ln. eL at vey, Myrtle Crook Drive, 60 toot right THEN" !n • Mortberly dlraatlou, .Igoe the Host right at woy 1lna Of Nryrele Ceeak Drive arasd o .urn to the right who.. radius 1. 990.00 feet, -has. ebord burs M2V 70'6s7, 160.50 feet • distant. of 160.97 fast to the P.I. of .old ourv1 TRAMS 1131.1D-00.6, Continuing along the seat right of way Sine et Myrtle Creek Driw, a dl.t.ace of loo.00 lest to the P.C. of a Cnrvel TROICE G s Northerly direction, aloeg the Beat right of way Sina o! lyrtlo Crack Drive, around a Curve to the left wbo.. redie. 1. g10.00 Gat, whose Chord bear. H25.52.19•S, 153.15 Coot- a dAotanee of 153.60 feet to the Place Of Beginning and Containing 16.3915 acres, ware or 1.... I I I I I I I 1 CREEI(MONT , JUBDIVISION CURI-E ND. RADIUS ARC DELTA I C1 175.00 30.67 10,02.29. I •OTAL Cr 26.3915 ACRES, Cx 175.00 6a,52 21.07'27' I Rl / NI.00IIB / CAT: IO C] Ca 225.00 27.37 O6'SS'11' BIACR 1 - 27 LOTS 0.995a ACRE CS 225.00 225.00 52.23 IV.5'I a2.23 10'as'2 I :TACK 2 l0 COT: I,bj C6 2000 Sa 65 9g,6'2S' R.00R 3 _ 5 =3 C7 50.00 31.a0 ]S'Se'5a' ! 9999 1 UN-RBSTRICTED RESERVE Ce 50.00 36.53 42'12'I5' C9 50.00 36.e1 4710.52' Ct0 C1T 50. 00 50.00 36.53 a712.15' 31.10 35'Se'Sa' EAST 22070r- C12 20.00 3t.65 9y16YS' C 1 3 20.00 3a.64 9116.2 I 50.00 2.22 'L1a 3S,67 I I CIS 50.00 as22 51'21'36''- I TWO CI6 CI7 50.00 50.00 4WS 1 3 ar25'31- 20.19 23OS'10" DAY CARE II C,S 50.00 2a.00 EW: W120 180C I 20.00 3041 er073o NOO UNE ND. DISTANCE SEARING - SCALE IN FEET ,err"n• I I Lf 31.e3• K O6'09'19' E U.E. UTILITY EASENENT �I L2 12.30' 1t OV02.37- w ILL OALOM LINE L3 La ta.19' 7.05• N OF09'19' E S 0752'30' E L.S.C. S.B.L. LANDSCAPE EASMENT SIDE BUILDING LINE LS 30.61' N 11.29']0' w D.A.I. (E) DRAINAGE ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING l6 t9.39• N tt'29'SC' w SPENCER HIGHWAY S t52'So' I I SD.Do' I I r wES7 i I 30.00' , 1 1 I � I ' I I 1 1 I I I I o I v_ 1 1 IZ I 3 Q ' QI� I I hl m 1 W ! 1 bl Q I �N ��1 ,n MRWI ;:. I Q In i� I 'm I W _ 1. ^ I Ci U) I U ' I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I � ' I 1 � I 1 , � 1 1 1 I L 1 9 1 1 1 v ! W ZC� Q: Q. CL :3 � LLJ Q: Z Cr w z M W g w >° Cd at III -se D OOi Sao J d; C7 4 O OCT 12 pp()3 L OCTOBER 10. 2003 MET NLRAER PAGE 1 OF 3 Do N F.y. . / + � perm, a eBRPTRi�T:a epGm,mRar , / I The.obwo draeln9, speellleshims. de T and anangenenta npneented th—by an and shall COAST AIIp BpRarripr. peyprrlplh rhallf�ClelellPmed. /: I •� dlseleeW to othan r ed !n +nestle+ / • P weA or ptejeeG w Ay any ether 'penes Ise - Wrpoea lAer tAan the peel[!. Preleet [w = they Awe Alen pnperad ..d developed I' .•!cheat the vrletan ..+vent. ,IT C�A6T CRGl11RlRIMp mip 6YRveT[Rp.._vl reel —t-t vLtb then drovinp or opselllestlew shall constitute % . enel aelve wldenee et a"t.nw of th.ee, eetrlellen... a+•.t 1 c-, eroua im .ac pnM c.o+t ma.• ra'y cm' poa. aww c er••:,• c c-I :-i ciaarar mar or res•m• ssar ii.»' lrarla' t air•.• c c-e c-e mtr m.ar Ism' situ• X. w r,r c-# mar loos . r ►»•ia• au,• �-. ism Lor K.rm• loot :ww Mimi• .4".. t-I, t-,I aw y.m' wires iiy' .rant t-:i low mom• ,. r :irarir 40 0 40 80 120 I-----T--L------ z -- ------ Ve,-mo,---- '�---'----------------� / d H. W W /\ a G: Issol cREEKMONT MiSSIONAWI SAP,iST CNURCr. . (crON8769.6) dy ^ z r-=-------J---�\---------------� I I i emil`•c 1 \\ � y Iy ea.-./ r i Lri / : 7 �\ '�� \\ "• �- nt i/t x .rye 'fib �/ ..a'— NOT PART OF ti �! , Nx>• . j ; a.. �° SUBDIVISION % 6 ji \ KING ARTHI ,Rii COURT � I ` (50' R.O.W) �1 / ♦ •+!rose ro,v ery x�L �' I E•{ + �� � ' � _ _ ,� +mm� ✓•w - I --T-T ! cam° J \ I ta'st I i J4J.'1 I �!'•/ aloe• I I I — —_ " — r2.� r �� `F a V� �() . I r, 65 LIr •( T r - �` FAIRMONT PARK EAST: : w SECTION 11 WEST CITY OF. LA FORTE HARRIS COUNTY; TEXAS �0��t\o / b , y I Z h g j L e• .arn [.[ �Va-orw:a• p W Z W = °q Z Ww FS a=..•� Z , C to i0i �11! ` ., j I' W e / 13: N N J R•Z, i• V �a il.a .7 1 �I hV O 0 ic L aC 1'e• vl Kai i!, �y d A!. "y W r/a• _�.i. L ;y ,r �a tw a aim 1 1= ,\!. / •,sons a �` a y i I �c-:•»' 9+NK 74n'E prd L soot a .art 1 t I .+e+r+uarw nnadyay aan��gj/-A ♦il�Vv AnU LICAII�Mvl.+raven ng ft -• • • Fairmont Park East Business Park Exhibits A. Commission's Action Request B. Aerial Map C. Zoning Map D. Staff Report E. Owner/developer's request F. Final Plat Fairmont Park East Busiark - Final Plat Planning and Zoning Co ion February 19, 2004 • Location of Subdivision 10400 Block of Fairmont Parkway Legal Description A 4.6 acre tract out of W. M. Jones Survey, A- 482. Applicant Eddie V. Gray Present Zoning General Commercial GC Requested Zoning General Commercial (GC) Acreage 4.619 acres Surrounding Zoning North General Commercial (GC) East General Commercial (GC) South Fairmont Parkway West General Commercial GC Land Use Map Commercial Activity Proposed Commercial Summary: • The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for proposed Fairmont Park East Business Park to be. located along Fairmont Parkway. • During the January 15, 2004 meeting, the Commission approved the Preliminary plat with the following conditions: a) Provide controlled access easement for unrestricted reserves 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 along Fairmont Parkway. The driveways should be limited to 2-3. b) Work with staff and look into common access limiting driveways on Fairmont Parkway and check mortgage companies's lending practices for properties that share access c) Submit a final plat along with all applicable documents. d) Submit construction drawings showing water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer management. e) Provide covenants, conditions or restrictions for the proposed business )ark f) Secure a driveway easement to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd • Staff and the developer held meetings to discuss the above issues. Staff has difference of opinion. It was suggested to have one 30' wide private drive for reserve 2 and two joint drives shared by the remaining reserves. However, the idea of three common access drives is still valid • The construction drawings also show a 50' common use access easement to be shared by all unrestricted reserves. • However, the owner/developer still needs to work on a joint driveway to the near of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd Staff reviewed the final plat along with required documentation and found it to Recommendation: be in comps with the applicable ordinances. Staff recommends approval of the final Plat subject to these conditions. But, the final plat shall not be released until the following items are addressed: • Secure a joint driveway to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd • Subdivision covenants and restrictions should reflect a reference of common use access moment and the owner/developer shall be responsible for its management • Access for reserve 1 on Farrington Blvd shall be the common access drive only. • Number and location of drives should be specified on the plat • Determine landscaping, screening and buffering mechanism to protect proposed residential from commercial developments in the rear. Commission's • Diamage mechanism should be noted on the plat Action: • Approval of the Final Plat as submitted • Disapproval of the Final Plat requires submission of a new Final Plat .gWINT ti .fit-� * � � � � *,� � ,� ►$h, � � _�'�."�,�,.��- � �.�� •. 4 xv, 7� Vol AI All 0 'IT zA 4 e 1 Staff Report Fairmont Park East Business Park February 19, 2004 Unrestricted Reserves — Final Plat Requested By: Eddie V. Gray, Trustee, Fairmont Park, JV. Requested For: A 4.619 acre tract out of an 10.5974 acre tract (TR 32, Fairmont Park, JV.), located in the William M. Jones Survey, Abstract-482, City of LaPorte, Harris County, Texas. cation: 10400 Block of W. Fairmont Parkway, at the northeast comer of Fairmont Parkway and Farrington Blvd. Present Zoning: ' General Commercial (GC) Background: During the January 15, 2004 meeting, the Commission asked the developer to address the following items related to this project: • Provide a controlled access easement for unrestricted reserves 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 along Fairmont Parkway. The driveways should be limited to 2-3. • Developer to work with staff and look into common access limiting driveways on Fairmont Parkway. Check with mortgage companies's lending practices for properties that share access. • Submit a final plat along with all applicable documents. • Submit construction drawings showing water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. • Provide covenants, conditions or restrictions for the proposed business park. • Secure a driveway easement to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd. To accomplish the above, the Commission agreed to approve the preliminary plat for Fairmont Park East Business Park conditionally. The applicant owns approximately 20-acre tract or parcels of land along both sides of Farrington Blvd. The area under consideration comprises 4.619 acres of land to the east of existing commercial uses along Fairmont Parkway. The property will be identified as Fairmont Park East Business Park, Unrestricted Reserves 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The owner has proposed unrestricted commercial reserves for the purpose of developing miscellaneous commercial developments. Staff held meetings with the developer to address the above issues and secure controlled access easement along Fairmont Parkway. As directed by the Commission, the developer has to provide sidewalks that would provide pedestrian access to connect Big Island Slough to the Exxon -Mobil Pipeline FPE Business Park 2/19/04 — P & Z Meeting Page 2 of 3 as described in the City's Pedestrian Plan. The plat shows the building lines at 68 ft. from the property line. An unrestricted reserve 2 has its own 30' wide driveway and is also interconnected with the controlled access easement provided by the applicant. While, there is a 50 ft. wide controlled access easement, which will be shared by the remaining commercial reserves along Fairmont Parkway. A typical controlled access mechanism is shown on the plat. However, the applicant stated some reasons not to provide a joint driveway to the rear of these reserves to exit on Farrington Boulevard alongside of the Dollar General's access drive (copy of the letter is attached). Analysis: Staff reviewed the following elements of the Comprehensive Plan in relation to the applicant's proposed development. Land Use: Review of the City's Land Use Plan indicates this area is envisioned as developing for commercial use. The proposed project is primarily for commercial uses permitted per Section 106441, Table A, of the Code of Ordinances. In addition, the proposed development consists of approximately five acres and. have five unrestricted reserves for commercial development. • Access Management & Layout: Fairmont Parkway, a 250' right-of- way, is a semi -controlled access highway. Since traffic movement is the primary function of this arterial roadway, access management is essential. Staff and the developer worked in restricting the driveway access of all commercial lots that front on Fairmont Parkway. Therefore, a controlled access easement is secured along Fairmont Parkway. A 50 ft. wide common use access easement will serve all unrestricted reserves along Fairmont Parkway. However, the owner/developer shall be responsible for management of this proposed common access easement along Fairmont Parkway. • Setbacks: The setbacks proposed for the reserves are 68 ft. on the front and 20 ft. to the rear adjacent to fit re residential. Additional setback provided on the front will facilitate a common access easement including drives, parking, and landscaping. • Utilities: There are sufficient water distribution facilities along Fairmont Parkway to supply potable water and fire protection to this proposed project. A 12" water line runs east and west along Fairmont Parkway. Currently, sanitary sewer service is not readily available to this site. As the City has a 21" trunk sewer main along. Fairmont Parkway. But, provisions will have to be made to provide a standard drop manhole. Where, service leads for each lot shall discharge directly into the sanitary sewer manhole. The construction drawings show a 6" sanitary sewer line within the common use access and utility easement. This line drops into an existing manhole as "T" connection. • • • FPE Business Park a 2/19/04 — P & Z Meeting Page 3 of 3 • Landscaping & Screening: As a part of the Commission's action, the applicant shall provide buffering measures and/or site -bearing fence with landscaping along rear property line. Staff recommends a six-foot site -bearing fence with landscaping including trees along the rear property line which will help reduce the possible impact of light or noise to the adjacent residential properties. Conclusion: Staff, using Section 4.04 and Appendix D of the Development Ordinance as a guide, has reviewed the plat and found it to be in compliance with applicable Development Ordinance requirements. At this time, the final plat for Fairmont Park East Business Park is recommended for approval with the following conditions: • Drainage mechanism should be noted on the plat. • Secure a joint driveway to the rear of all properties that exit on Farrington Blvd. • Subdivision covenants and restrictions should reflect a reference of common use access easement and the owner/developer shall be responsible for its management • Access for reserve 1 on Farrington Blvd. shall be a common drive only. • Number and location of drives should be specified on the plat. • Determine landscaping, screening and buffering mechanism to protect proposed residential from commercial developments in the rear. , Commission's Action: • Approve the final plat withholding signature and recordation until the above are complied; • Disapprove the final plat, which requires filing of a new final plat. reu lu UT 1Gi our UV450 Cf14Cf-r+►-19e9 IGOL J TLV LUVJ 11 J Grey Enterprises February 11, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City of LaPorte La Porte City Council 604 W. Fairmont Parkway LaPorte, Texas 77571 Attn: LaPorte Planning and Zoning Commision RE: Fairmont Park Business Park Final Plat Approval for the February 19, 2004 Planning and Zoning Meeting Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: I, Eddie V. Gray, Trustee, hereby request the LaPorte Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the Final Plat of the Fairmont Park Business Park based upon the Final Plat prepared by Gulf Coast Engineering and Surwying, James W Gartrell Jr. P.E., RPS dated February 5, 2004. This final plat complies with the request from the LaPorte City Staff that this area be served with three (3) driveways to serve the five (5) commercial tracts along Fairmont Parkway. The access makes use of a Common. Access Easement to provide Bross -access across the Commercial Reserves. After investigation, the rear driveway connecting this area with Farrington Boulevard is not feasible. Please contact me if you have any further -questions. Yours truly, Eddie V. Gray, Trustee FP21-04 P.O. Box 6S8 - 707 Memorial Drive 9 Baytown, TX 77522 - (281) 42E,3677 - Fax (281) 42&1689 Adak so o so Too ,so CURVE I RADIUS ARCDELTA FAI.RMONT 'PARK EAST .. C. 20.00' 29.W' as-39'4e- . C2 S20.00• 40.e4' r•s'4s• BUS!'NESS PARK SCALE IN FEET C34 so.00 7e.549?00:.0 UN -RESTRICTED CS 50.00' $1.55' 70-31 RESTRICTED RESERVES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5''AND 6 Ce 50.00' 41.15 4T09'"1 Zoo, 2a.17• IV19'•e- CITY OF LA PORTE Ce 50.00• 22.]9' 19'19'29 / C9 :50.00' 33.94' Os'sl'47 RABBIS COUNTY, TEXAS ` STREET US / C10 20.00' ]].9•' 00*5 57' _-• CII l221.00 ee.St' OOse \ C12 140 "' 22.2e 09.0T 12" ' C5221.1V 159.17- 01'a•'.ae7- CI2e312' 01'0319-CI5112199.GOT"' • / COR. 4 SIDEWALKIS SAN WINt / I9N-1a.e.9 p r Ell / / I SANS \ '10•I D ( �1. FENCE / S •/ \ �ISIAMW.H.etl fee f ITIRM PROPOSSER R / ON N19NE FA/ / iL-II.SSi M q 4. / R ' \ STIXRi P TRT �b 1 $� �Z7.�`7 �a�y�/�/ RIM -2036' l 6 l SEC NI?AT ft-14.°2' I 1Eh 13.61 1 2 .K 3 ".� C Z/ l O If / 8 / I Rnli.l '11i II �Iu_ lei pppp5 o]� \ \ 5 BLOCK- y l If . IISiwC I q `sprRi\M SE1�7[ \ I �*H \ 6 /= 8 ta. ` y`e 24.4 P�1 1 /0 12E)WATER I RO ED ) ` • w E° 7 o / ` LINE R-1 2fq/1. 36.E .1 P.v. // _ L-4J7..5 11"S�K1K eCWEIi 0p� ` �� 1 • , \ / 9 '8 7•u.E. `'7 / / -1I1I.''LCN-4J7.S0' 10• U.E. / .. c M i CNe.N 0••47'41• E :# 26 \ `0.0°` ` .704 V y_ ` \ / /p. NN T\ 0�50 / O A I `III �R/o xs e.� \ J �ti . Oqo4ID `\. . �.! p. / 10 (c w NOT OPEN)yx l? 10 III' ` 6/_ 2 7 \ r `` F^ 7,f.�9.7 \ \ �C�- a• 9.L. .8 SET- eACK UNE\ �q \ \� ` / / )3 / Y N Z I 1 I eO.E. =/ 7 24 / \ ,9 1 `\JD:` /G \ \ \-1 1 L� Q °_'V , / /' t 2.3 \ ` \ VO. ` / IS Ix•i0• W� 1`M`E / l/j r4 / L k Z N �• III ` l- _ 22 \ \ ` !V, :s.� a' am. �1 s „•:°] w.I`` V - Q 1 I 11 swsZaT �` \ -,/� / ` `!� �ob PROPosEo r �°• el/yw sE� \� "t ,� / 6 2 1 wA17R LOOP ) �'7'.p. // 1 sAn MN 'A\ ` 2s' B.L. T \ 13.°0• / 31 e9.7\W 2 U Y I O III ' ` 20' ILL C �� ` / \8 \ k- / D 1• V E. FIR-I9.se' I7.-14.90' 14 r o W. BAD. 0.15• - -QLLJ 10. ORA9UGE i0' 20 8 \ \ `�` 14' U.E. �T V ~ \S = I ESMT. VNRESTRICTE6 -Z- l �l 19 8,l to D.E \I I I / RESERVE 1 �' 19. _8/ PRaPosEoT t- / / \e / '/ � \ Q 1 O.92 ACRE R �x.72• a sE vE9 12.79/ \ .� L sEi REAR J r 4 654 O BLOC 1 e/8 1 7« l r LINE � � ��� � �- _' 'fig I � :s ILL )`�•v�ya�� I- \ // ti. � �. ]e R I 5 NT -_�-- 10' B.L ���� „ �� l %- 16 15 % In «12.1• / -----_�_- --_- -a 4 . �� m 4' •9a.79• �' ,Z9II'- - 1 OD P.P. 14' U. S zP yy 1.5 �7 m Y 19aD' Tear 19.a 20• CONCRETE ORNE cNp°iII2. 1. TOP ROCK 1•Z29_� ••• \ ` �. I ,lem'?) i n a 4 7?Se'pT w FlLL-21. 9 2. 1, aE. �7..9' - - -!' /l 11 ij EKZON Pl. ° W I °•13 1 SET -BACK r \ "�]•°'- 2i�.S1•�L7om'- - �- �-�- - / 1 /// / O.e9 AC. Ff IC PER MARKERS 1 U.E. ^ f F.P.-22.21 x2.2]'UNE `- _'\_ 1•. // 1/ ;erg• NC[ / f SAN MN (E) I ' 5 , ' I SET-yBA�CK F `� x0' REAR I PIPE OF 1 19.e� UNRESTRICTED, �� �� WATER METER Box RIM-19.7le' I LwE SET -BACK FL-_1 e1. (U288518 HCDR) l/ l RESERVE 6 / NOTE Is GENERAL ; I SEUN-E 71. ; I $ SE BACK 8 SETU--BACK R620599 HCDR STORE $$ 7 $ $ 8 O ( ) I I« I s UNRESTRICTED („/ 16.9• � �4/ SERVICE 10405 "gR I UNRESTRICTED Ig ^I sEr1i°ACE' a y,E I^ I RESERVE 5 (I o SIDE / yV\� , f9i6' O I STATION I I RESERVE 2_I _ SET -BACK s I 10 SOE SET -BACK felt DRA p 911014• WE �(J c` 9a0' UNE 9.7' SET -BACK ° LINE PMagNT PARK9NY t SLOE 0) t0401 I , ! :e.9 UNRESTRICTED - UNRESTR)CTED' uN. I R.G.W.mNICE SIDE gp , : RESERVE 3 J' RESERVE 4 S 1°''' � ee' BLOC. uNE TOP ROCK - -1 L- - - - 8 - - - J g �- - - - J L - LINE- - 12WATER II iN0 J/I . BLOC, ' -� J-1 ' j I II 1' IIU.E. P ) 'P) ILINE (E) SIGN �S sMII (P• / / If1Sw4 (P) NOTE � OE /] S54 (P) (P) 10' U.EO a' e O ITT .: f�rrtt ',..y?7;:`. i- .:'• . IIA9Ta. a-muanlurz:a umamT� : ' Th..how A...inq. .pwlrkatl.u.. Aulgh..M • arra gow.G npew•ntA tharoh,'ar• aM .ha Ll w1A eh. P'.P.rt7 ei OOV COA9.T 9NGIK9R91NO Ap0 91IRgtTING. No Pact th.rroE..n.lt h.. eeppLid.' d Laule.ad to .than• ee !n ^'{= • %•�':�:. E:4 ad g.nnaetl...eLtli .e7 wtlL .t project a by any other !a[ •: t •: ':.:,^�: p•[.en any purpow eth.[ th n the M an !.r ..'Q,... ti'•: rilie .nlah LhaT M•• M•o e�.ParW ad. d•wloped .: •�: r• '•': ';`• ua`.: rttnout the .eltI... t i GULF COAST •. SKGItlSSR111G ANO EMANATING. Vlauai contentriti eM.. de.ringa er ap.e llkatleN .hall .... titot. Via;; .-,'.• ; enelu•!.o ••la•nc• .I aee•PLee...9 the.. •�•/:;t. •.'. :'s, ^'' Lily ity, _ FN.� A � - - - - - - - L - *'mp VAWES - - -1i-mg 4 SSS (P) T _ 9 - - - -.- - - - - - - - �- - - J 4' Ss5 (P) _ - - i.N. (E) 10-1 12' WATER LINE ( - Ste) S e9'!]'S0- w 70s.72' e- S 4, -Owi P iNOJ 4 e9'lYS2• IT70.9.32 _ �/ICCFL1r!]7x 19) _ NOTE /] FL ts-.le.e ' ' 1 7' R arch (E) e- S (P) (P) - •�-' - Exz N PL WRKERS 9. / 21' yW SEWER E ,I e.7' 9. �xi' SaN. S 2y � Mill. e'-�--f--f� PAM�MD-J3--1� �-y }, J� f Y f� SAW�19,�E) e.e' SAMNRMA642%}19 )(BROKEN ACCESS EASEMENT 21.e4 FL-13.01' «C1.2 A l R M O N T IN.�9 E10) Y PA R K WA �L:,,.,,. (2 5 0' R. O. W h-:1.Tr UNRESTRICTED RESERVE 2 AND UTILITY EASEMENT .� ' yyppTTEE__���x� UNITE USE ACCESS EASEMENT 1 5. AND UNRESTRICTED RESERVES 3. 4. s. AND e. AND UIILTTY EASEMENT 555-Sa0.E SNIITAM SEWER SERNC[ S-SANITARY SEWER ' USE ACCESS EASEMENT UNRESTRICTED RESERVES 3. 4. - w-WATER LINE�OMND- 511'S-SILCLE WATER SERVICE OWS-OUAL WATER SERVICE - s. AND S. AND UTILITY EASEMENT btoTy 2C& EASEMENT UNRESTRICTED RESERVE I AND UTILITY EASEMENT . R� D AND REPLACE WITH e' CONCRETEON 6. CEMENT SAND BASE Q C"': N� a. .- Z X Cc QO ~ :L ca y •'C: W: sNccr. I ri