Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-26-1986 Regular Meeting ZBOA . . NINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE LA PORTE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 26, 1986 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Lawrence Farias \J Member of the oard Present: Lawrence Farias, Jack Humphrey, Deborah Bernay, ec il Kn ight \ J Members of the Board Absent:~~ivian Covington,~eanne Zemanek, Gladys Roth Members of City Staff Present: Building Inspector Mark Lewis, Assistant City Attorney John Armstrong Others Present: Odis Freeman, Connie Dove, Imogen MacNeil, Mrs. Martin, Jerry Shults 2. The Board considered approving the minutes of the meeting held March 13, 1986. Motion was made bv Cecil Knight to aDDrove the minutes of the March 1j meeting. Second by Deborah Bernay. The motion carried, 4 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Nays: Farias, Humphrey, Bernay, Knight None 3. The board considered the request of Odis Freeman for variance to Section 13-205(3) of the La Porte Zoning Ordinance, for a front yard fence. Connie Dove, representing Mr. Odis Freeman, addressed the Board regarding Mr. Freeman's request. After questions from the Board, motion was made bv Deborah Bernav that the variance be denied. Second by Jack Humphrey. The motion carried, 4 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Nays: Farias, Humphrey, Bernay, Knight None John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the next line of appeal was to the Harris County Court, prosecuted within 10 calendar days after the decision has been filed. 11 f. fJd If )y J t::-1?7 L- Y /fJ"- 'j 0 1/ Nell' ~L "> /III~t ;a. ~ . . Minutes, La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment June 26, 1986, Page 2 4. The Board considered the request of Imogen B. MacNeil for variance to Section 13-201, Article 13, of the La Porte Zoning Ordinance. Mrs. MacNeil's daughter addressed the Board regarding this request. The Assistant City Attorney opined that this item was clearly not a variance request; it should come before the Board as an appeal of the determination of the Building Official. He suggested that this item either be tabled and brought back when the request could be appropriately framed for the Board of Adjustment to make a decision it is competent to make, or that the complaint be amended to reflect what actually needs to be done for the Board to act upon. Motion was made bv Deborah Bernav to overturn the decision of the Building Official. Second by Jack Humphrey. The motion carried, 4 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Nays: Farias, Humphrey, Bernay, Knight None 5. The Board considered the request of Jerry Shults for variance to Section 11-105 of the La Porte Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Shults addressed the Board regarding this item. Motion was made bv Deborah Bernav to denv the variance reauest. Second by Jack Humphrey. The motion carried, 4 ayes and 0 nays. Ayes: Nays: Farias, Humphrey, Bernay, Knight None 6. There being no further business, the meeting was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted: Cherie Black for Jeanne Zemanek Secretary to the Board of Adjustment . . Minutes, La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustment June 26, 1986, Page 3 Passed & Approved this 28th day of August, 1986 Lawrence Farias, Chairman CITY OF LA PORTE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Board of Adjustments DATE: 6/20/86 FROM: David A. Paulissen, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Front Yard Fence - 3329 Bernard Blk. 5; Lot 64; Spencer Highway Estates Mr. Odis R. Freeman has asked that a variance be granted for his front yard fence which is located at the address indicated above. By State Law a variance must be based on hardship as defined by said law, i.e., 'Undo hardship that due to topography makes Ordinance unenforceable'. This would not be the case on this piece of property. Staff recommends that the variance NOT be granted. DAP/dsw xc: John Armstrong, City Attorney CITY OF LA PORTE PHONE (713) 471-5020 . P. O. Box 1115 . LA PORTE. TEXAS 77571 CERTIFIED MAIL liP 172 182 917 May 6,1986 Mr. Odis R. Freeman 3329 Bernard La Porte, Tx. 77571 Re: Front Yard Fence - 3329 Bernard Blk. 5; Lot 64; Spencer Hwy. Estates Dear Mr. Freeman, This letter is to confirm my telephone conversation of today with your wife. I explained to her that your front yard fence is a violation of Zoning Ordinance 1/ 780; Sect.13-305 (3). Your wife asked if there was any way to keep this fence. The only way the fence could remain would be for you to have a variance granted by the Planning & Zoning Board of Adjustments. To apply for such variance, you need to address a request to the Planning & Zoning Commission Board of Adjustments, P.O. Box 1115, La Porte, Texas 77571, Attention City Secretary. This request should state the hardship that resul ts in your need of a front yard fence. A meet ing would then be scheduled and you would be notified of the date, time and place of the meeting. Since you and your wife will be leav ing on vacation shortly, I will allow you thirty (30) days to either remove the front yard fence or apply to the Boa rd of Adjustments for a v ar ianc e. I f the Boa rd denies your variance request and if the fence is not removed 7 the matter will be taken to Municipal Court. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions. Respectfully, ~ Utt~ 2J~lV!~ Debra S. Wilmore Building Inspector (f) 11fdfl .:? I, J q f b J woaiJ J;P 10 ~ ;to ~ ~ ~ftw~ Jr74 6-~~ ~~ f1UJ~~~~-~~ ~ -->> ~/ ()?<fl- ~ P-- ~ r'""^- ~ ~:it ~ ~ fiUJ b4A-/~fi, ~ ~/~' ,0v.J-<^ ~ .;Jo ~ #- rt- ~J ~' wP- J~ ;.;f LJ~~ ~,J.,d ~ju+-~~~ h~~J'~~.~~ ~ ~ ~t>/f~~ ril. t.d vJ~ ;.;f vJ~~..~ jJ ~,_~;t;fY+~ F~~ --ry ~ )nA- j.Jd, ~ Co9-<~J ~ a- ~J) of tdll9 ~ ~,~t~W.uJ-~r/...-; ~~ 6:- ~JJ 6f ;dUs-/ u/~ M txV#' ~ ;dd ~ .,J~>'- J ~ v.-f;ek ~ ~Ji ;f;;i\A~ '1Y't<f ~ ~. .. / / (j) Jw~l~ w~~~~ ~ cd- -mcf ~_. :J4 w~ 1hJ2. ~'1 ~ wovJJ- d- ~ IJ.o~ a-vS) WQ ~ w.vJ. ~ W~ ~ W(L ~ ~ ~J&12 ~ ~~ U-~(----- --- --- ..~ ~ ~ 7'-V .~ A ~ w~.d.z ~~~~f .__ __ __ .. . _. .~~ tOci'a . $~~ --- ---..- ----- - /?J~4- 7 q .-3 Cf 55_ __ fs. P~-~_~..~ rft:i~ ---U&J..Go- ~ d .,de _u_____ 0_ .._.__..___ ____...._..___ ..___.._.____,_.____. _..,___.._ _.._... CITY OF LA PORTE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: P & Z Board of Adjustments DATE: 6/20/86 FROM: David A. Paulissen, Zoning Administrator/Building Official SUBJECT: Mrs. Imogen B. Mac Neil's Request for Variance to Section 13-201(13) of City Zoning Ordinance #780 Bayshore Block; Lots 7,8; Bayshore Park This property comprises the Seabreeze Sailing Center and the residence and property located to the north side of the sailing center. The fenced pasture in question is located adjacent to the Bayshore Street right-of-way. Section 13-201 regulates allowable uses of residentially zoned property. Article 13 reads as follows: (Allowable uses are) "Farms, truck gardens, orchards, and nurseries for the growing of plants, shrubs, and trees provided no retail or wholesale business sales office is maintained on the premises and provided further that no poultry or livestock other than other household pets shall be housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property lines." Although the sailing center is a commercial use, the property it occupies has never been commercially zoned. It is a legal pre-existing non conforming use. As such it may be continued indefinitely (subject to the restrictions of Section 11-105 of Ord. #780). However, property uses not related to the sailing center are subject to residential restrictions. This property is large enough to house an animal over 100 feet from any property line and as such there is no hardship, as defined by State Law, involved. Staff recommends against granting a variance in this matter. MSL/dsw xc: John Armstrong, City Attorney ,.,. ..' :;:, Board of Adjustment c/o City Secretary P.O. Box 1115 La Porte, Texas 77571 Application for variance to zoning ordinance regarding section 12-201 article 13. In answer to Mr. Paulissen's interpretation of ordance I respectfully summit the following; I own lots seven and eight of Bayshore Block Bayshore Park subdivision. This was established as co~~ercial property before zoning went into effect. Enclosed you will find a drawing of our fenced pasture area (which I recently replaced and repaired) and an-:. existing horse stall (built with city permit in 1959). I kept one or two hors~ in this area daily from 1959 through 1970. After ~ 'S' one horse in the stall off and on during summers, on weekends, and holidays. In 1985 my daughter and I were both widowed. We have determined that the easiest way for us to exist is to live together. Since my grand children aged four and seven, have a pony, we need to use the horse stall. It would be a severe hardship on us not to be allowed to use this existing stable. All neighbor's houses are located well over 100 feet away frOM the area so that the pony will not be near anyone's home. We own the two lots directly across the street. We have made every effort to make the area attractive and invisible frOM the road by replacing old fence with a wood privacy fence. Sincerely, Imogen B. Mac Neil June 8, 1986 .,'11;.'" . ' y-.'._..... \.. ~ov...",.c:- c-\ _....---~ " ,1:'; '" ~ ":~ ~,' :,~' ~~~~.~ , I' .' '. " .,u----~~..-- _~.e."c."'. .... ... ~ ? o '- \)-7 \ \ A .:::J. d o ; ~ } x~ ~ e; \p . \0 'IJ . ~ Q.. ( r-..' v' - i .L ~ I \00 .-'-~'" ..-......,...,----- .fe,:(\ c.e \ ' J3 f-.'-':> y.., .:::tI e.....):)~' v e,....- ~ <t '>- " ~ '> .:: Q... . "i"\e.e- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i rv\ \ \ \ \ 3 ~----- v :, \ "> \ - :i\ '- \\ 8 I ~ ~ \ " " ~ \\ \ t " o o ~ " V '1. ~()os i\(o( ~ Co-r ~_r_--' ?~tA..V . .,''- -,,~,~,~-"-~-~- CITY OF LA PORTE INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: P & Z Board of Adjustments DATE: 6/20/86 FROM: David A. Paulissen, Zoning Administrator/Building Official SUBJECT: Jerry Shults' Requested Variance to Sect. 11-105 of City Zoning Ord. #780 3300 Blk. of Bayer Street Blk. 5; Lots 73,74; Spencer Highway Estates This piece of property is located in the Spenwick area. There are presently four (4) mobile homes located on these lots. None of the four (4) homes are in habitable condition and none have been occupied since late 1983 or early 1984. Mr. Shults has stated his intentions are to repair the mobile homes presently located on this site and use them for rental property. He has also requested a variance to Section 11-105 of Ord. #780. This section deals with the discontinuance of non-conforming uses. It reads as follows: "If a nonconforming use of any structure or premises is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, the use of the same shall thereafter conform to the requirements of the district in which it is located. The Board of Adjustments shall have the power to grant an extension not to exceed six (6) calendar months when warranted by, evidence presented." This request is presumably so Mr. Shults can operate this property as a mobile home park. This would allow him to replace the existing homes on this site with different ones. As to Mr. Shults' stated request to repair the existing homes, there is no Ordinance conflict and he is free to proceed with repairs subject only to normal building permit requirements. In regards to his variance request, both the twelve (12) month period of discontinuance and the six (6) month extension period have expired. For this reason Staff feels NO variance should be granted in this matter. Mr. Shults is however, free to request a formal re-zoning of this property to "Industrial" which, if granted, would allow him to apply for a special use permit for a mobile home park. MSL/dsw xc: John Armstrong, City Attorney \, April 29, 1986 ,. To the honorable council of the Ci ty of La Por t e, Texas. Please' allow me, Jerry Shults to preface this correspondence by statin~; that I in no manner intend to disrupt any on going business, CalJSe any ill feelings or produce extra work for any council melllbers who might be involved. Very simply stated, this is lilY attempt to create a positive and profitable situation for all illvolvcd partj.t~:;. The situation I refer to is the lots 73 and 74 in block five (5), of Spencer Highway Estates, Harris County, Texas, plat recorded .. in Volume 38, at Page 57, of the Map Records of Harris County, Texas. La Porte water .records reveal that last service to the above property was in approximately Jan 1, 198~ 27 months ago. City ordinance 780 deals with the subject matter of restoration of properties and buildings which have been vacant for a specific period of time, 12 months I beli~ve is the limit. The property In mention has been vacant for 27 months, a difference of only 15 months. The issue I beg to plea ~ith the council is this 15 months. The property is now in possession of Galena Park State Bank. Bank personnel have never even seen the property. It is also common knowledge that the bank has encountered unanticipated complications in selling the property. The complication arise specifically from City Ordinance 780, which I [eel is basically well written and a beneficial ordinance which is interided for the . betterment of the City of La Porte. However, it is my belief tlwt in this particular instance that a 15 month extension to the ordinance 780 would be in the best interest of the City of La Purtl'. . This is a rare case when all parties can benefit, all parties being La Porte, the Bank, and myself, with just a little extra effort, and without this concerted effort the situation will remain status quo. The status quo option will leave the property unimproved, unmowed and generally uncared for, an eyesore and a possible hazard for surrounding residence. Status quo will also leave the bank with real estate that cannot be sold simply because without the restora- tion of the existing homes, the property itself is not worth what is owed on it. The banks policy on ORE is to put no capitol into improvements of the property. It is quite concievable that the property could remain, in the identical condition, or worse, for years, possibly until real estate prices rise considerably,beyond even ,the most optimistic predictions of 3 to 5 years. In addition, wi thout inhabi tants, the Ci ty of La Porte will lose revenues from water usage as well as taxes due to land improvements. It is my belief, and commitment to City of La Porte, that the houses can and will be completely restored and liveable at a rate of one house per seven week period. A total span of only 28 weeks is necessary to totally restore the property and homes. It is my intention to paint, patch, mow and completely restore the property and homes to a like new condition. Adequate financing is available to complete the entire project in 28 weeks or less. A letter of commitment can be provided as proof if necessary. I will be more than willing to work closely with each department of inspection and will meet or exceed all city codes and standards expected of me. Without restoration the property is of no value to me, so my motivation for completion is obvious. In conclusion to council please let me state again that I mean no harm and hope to cause no inconvenience to anyone. I do feel, however, that my plea and offer is a "no lose" proposition for the City of La Porte for the state and condition of the property can only be improved upon. I do wish that my willingness to please . the inspectors, the City and the residences of Bayer street will be considered when making your decision. Basically, I am asking council only for a chance. SderelY ( tt Jerr:1hQ~~ , . April 30, 1986 I, Jerry Shults, formaly request a hearing before the La Porte Zoning Board of Adjustments. Sincerely, Jerry Shults