Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-1988 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting-cancelled/no quorum•4 • LA PORTE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS • MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 10, 1988 Members Present: Deborah Bernay, Jack Humphrey, Jody Seeger, Gladys Roth, James Farson Members Absent: I~one City Staff Present: Jce] 1 Albrecht, Director of Community Developments Mina Dye, Secretary Others Present: Harry flan I~~agner, President of Aii Foly Drum; J. L. Thompson, Architect, for Ali Poly Drum; Joe I'S.ng, Owner• of J. King, Inc. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack I~umphrey at at 7:06 P.M. `" • 1. CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 8, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING There was a rc:ct~.on by Deborah Bernay and a second by James Parson to approve the rninutes as read. The vote was unanS.rr;cus and t}~ie motion carried. 2. CONSIDER APPEAL TO THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S DECISION REGARDING REPLACEMENT OF A DESTROYED Pi01i-CONFORMING USE (APPEAL X88-002). REQUESTED BY MRS. DELIA~CLAUS FOR 808 SOUTH 2ND STREET. A. Staff informed the 5oar•ci that I~~rs. Glaus r.~as not F,resent.. Staff properly notified }per of t}ie meeti.n~,. B. I~?rs. Claus Sias not present tior anyone in her behalf. C. There was a r;~ction by Deborah Fernay and a second by James Farson tc: den~~ t}ie request dc: to the fact that t};e app].icar,t was not present. The vote was unaniu~ovs. 3. CONSIDER .SPECIAL EXCEPTIONv I;EQL'EST X88-011 FOR AN EXCEPTION TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 7-600, TABLE B OF ORDINANCE X1501. REQUESTED BY ALL PLY DRUM SERVICE ~ SUPPLY COMPANY, 1$13 WEST PIAIN, BY MR. H. C. VAN WAGNER. A. Staff ' s r•epor•t. ~,-as given . Sta ff f s r~econ~r••~,endaS: ~ on to the ® Foard is to grant this Special Excet~tion Ivo. 88-011. 1~. }iarr•y lTan 4ta~;ner•, Fresiden*.. c,f All Poly Drur, was. s.c•:or•n ir, by Ghairr~ar, Jack. Ht;mp}irey. All Foly Druni i. :; r•ec;taesting t},e r`- ® • • Minutes 11/10/S8 Page 2 Sl:~ecial Exception to allow therr~ to put in a water treating facility by treating the crater, taking ar~y c`c,l~~'i•c"~~,~;liet'~t;~ rL:t of it and reuse t}'fe water agai.r~. TI?is will eiin;inate us from dumping water into tl:e City's sewer system. C. There was a niotion by Gladys Roth and a secot?d by Debora}' Bernay to grant this Special Exception. The vote was unanimous. 4. CONSIDER SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST #88-012 FOR AN EXCEPTION TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 7-600, TABLE B OF ORDINANCE #1501. REQUEST FOR J. KING, INC., 1440 SENS ROAD, BY MR. JOE KING. A. Staff's report was given recon;rr:er.ding the BUaI••ci to deny this Specia]. Exception because it does not meet the prerequisite requirements (side yard setbacks) necessary for granting a special exception. • E,. Joe King, Owner of J. King, Inc. was sworn in by Chairman Jack Hurnphrey. This Special Exception wiJ.l allow him to set two (2) office trailers which will enhance the present facilities as well as giving llim more office space. C. There was a rncti.on by Gladys Roth and a second by Deborah Bernay to grant this Special Exception Recuest ;r88-012. The vote was unanimous. 5. ADJOURN There r;as a motion by Jody Seeger and a second by Deborah Bernay to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 7:43 P.M. ~.pectfully submi i, ina Dye, Secretary Minutes approved on _ day of _.._______.._____.____..__ , 1988. Jac)c rurnpl?rey, Chairman • ,~ r~ L SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST #SE89-001 • ® CITY OF LA PORTS r ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST ----------- ------------------------ ---------Application No.. ~ - GL~~ OFFICE USE ONLY: e~ei 50.00 Date Receive d: ~^/-/ Receipt No.: U(r-y yoCn NOTE: This ----------- Fee is Non-Refundable Regardless of the Boar ------------------------------ -- ----------- d's ---- Decision. ----------- Applicant. ~, ,~ ~ .i7a ~.N ~ ~', ,~.- (~ tdame I lV ~ ~ J ~ t~} ~i,C1 ~y°~~ P H : ~~~ Ci- ~ ~ ~ y Address I am th e owner of the herein de scribed property. I have authorized to act on my behalf in this matter. Owner: ldame PH: Address (~ Site Plan Minor Development Site Plan ( ) Major DevelopmeSite Plan ( ) General Plan I am reouesting a Special Exception Zoning Ordinance No. 1501. I am.re~q property located at L_n ~ '`~ ~ 5 C Address _ _ of the City pecial Exception for Legal Description A Site Plan of the property is attached. Also, I have listed the information requested below on the following pages of this form. a) All facts concerning the matter that has led up to this request. b) The type of relief I am seeking (setbacks, lot coverage, etc.). c) The grounds upon which I am making this request. * If applicant is NOT the owner, he must provide Authorization to act on the Owner's behalf. Date App 'can s Signature ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY Site Plan and Authorization (if applicable) attached? Yes ( ) No ( ) to Sect. _, esting this Date transmitted to the Board of Adjustments: n U Meeting Date: Applicant Notified of Date: Board's Decision: Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Notice of Board Decision mailed to Applicant/Owner: _ ® i • PAGE 2 A Special Exception is a deviation from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Before they grant a special exception, The Board of Adjustments must determine that the exception is not contrary to the best public interest and will not adversely affect the value or use of adjoining property. Special exceptions may be granted for the following items only: (1) The reconstruction of or addition to a building occupied by a non-conforming use. Additions cannot extend past the lot occupied by the original structure or use. The reconstruction or use cannot prevent the property from returning to a conforming use. (2) Deviation of yard requirements under the following cir- cumstances: • (a) Exceptions to front yard requirements if front yard setbacks are not met on abutting pieces of property. (b) Exception to rear yard setbacks if any four (4~) lots within a block do not meet setback requirements. (c) Exceptions to yard requirements on corner lots. (d) Exceptions to front yard requirements if existing front yard setbacks on a block are not uniform. (3) Waiving or reduction of off street parking and loading requirements if the Board feels they are unnecessary for~the proposed use of a building or piece of property. • Please remembe•r.~~it is the Applicant's responsiblity to prove that a Special Exception will meet the above conditions. If there is not adequate room on the remainder of this form to list all pertinent information, please feel free to attach an additional letter or any information and exhibits you feel the Board should consider. FACTS RELEVANT TO THIS MATTER: We are a Factory Mutual Approved Service Or anization. We have been operating for a few years. We provide Ci~y of LaPorte and whole community with_a_valuable service. We bring business to La Porte area, plus more tax dollars. r~~ oca Po ice and Fire Departments maintain their safety equipment. Area in question...has been commercial since d~ 1.Plan to beautifythe area and-modif operations. Business is growing~to the size that we will have to expandy, lay off some employees or move to a new location. Building is 42 feet•from street (San Jacinto Street). ® • • PAGE 3 TYPE OF RELIEF BEING SOUGHT: Granting a special exception, to that we ma; h,_Lild additional Space, so we may continue to sP,zr~?V~r.~}.Clue that ma~.reTuire our service. • THE GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST: Groda Enterprises is already an established business and the _~esent space is no longer large enough for the business to continue to grow at the pace we are now going. ~ We are legal to operate on Grandfather and Pre-existing Business Clause. Groda is a ~'acto_ ry_Mutual Service Organization, has been since 1985. We are Member of,.La Porte Chamber of Commerce. We sponsor Baseball Teams and various school and church organization fund-raisers. In askin for this re uest, we feel we will be contributing to the growth of this fine city, of La Porte. CED/T-'87 • ' ~ SITE PLAN SUBMT_TTrL FORM c r~Ir]oR ) (FIVE (5) COPIES OF THE SITE PLAN ARE IdECESSARY) .. ( 1) JOB ADDRESS: 1009 SAN JACINTO ~• ( 2) DEVELOPt~EN]T NdA1~1E: GRODA ENTERPRISE INC. ( 3) USE OF BUILDIldG: OFFICE & SHOP Describe: 2 STORY ADDITION: 1 FLOOR SHOP; 2 FLOOR OFFICE ( ~4) CLASS OF WORK: IJEW X ADDITION] • ( 5) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1009 SAN JACINTO, LOTS 4 & 5., BLOCK 305 ( b) OWIrER'S NAME: GARY A. GRODA PH: 470-8348 ( 7) REPRESENTATIVE OR OTWELL CONTRACTOR: COIdSTRUCTIOIy CO. PH. 713-591-0891 13515 ANN LOUISE, HOUSTON, TX. 77086 SUBMITTAL ~~ 88-160 •~ RECEIPT i~ • FEE COLLECTED ~ ' CASHIER .. ~ DATE SUBMITTED: X15.00 FOR 1ST 5 ACRES ~ 5.OO ~FOR EACH ADDITIONAL ACRE CITY OF LA FORTE PHONE (7'1.3) 471-5020 • P.O. BOX 1115 • LA FORTE, TEXAS 77571 Cash ..•_--.- _. ~ Check ` r ~~~ ` ~ ~~.. RECEIPT C,!:,4^y;;~ DATE !,i`J•~ j'/;-~/ ,~M•oriey0rder ~ 1 -" Cashier Check RECEIVED FROM 1 ~~ ~•~••~'~%L '" j' ;_,- PAYMENT FOR •. j?-':::~._..~_;~ V'~,.,'~+.,1;: ~, 1% AMOUNTS ! ~~~ ) ~~ DESCRIPTION -~ [. ~i - - 'r ~+ i ~ ~ f •. ~~ ~ ~ 7 t~>~ 1~~; CASHIER • ® • • GRODA ENTERPRISES, INC. • • Request: Special Exception Request ~dSE89-001 Requested for: 1009 San Jacinto Legal Description: Lots 4 & 5; Blk 305;~La Porte Tract (see Exhibit A) Zoning: R-3, High Density Residential (see Exhibit B) Annlicant: Groda Enterprises, Inc., Gary Groda, Owner Background: The applicant is requesting this special exception to allow the expansion of an existing commercial building located in a R-3 Zone. Ownership of buildings and property in this location is somewhat complex. Mr. Groda owns lots 4 & 5 of this block ano" the building located on it. This building is joined by means of a covered breezetaay to the building on the adjoining property. Both the Zoning Ordinance and building code consider these joined structures to be a single building. Although, Groda Enterprises occupies and utilize s• both portions of the joined building, due to the fact that Mr. Groda only owns lots 4 & 5, only these lots may be considered in this request. In addition to the 40 ft. X 40 ft. building located on these lots, there is, .also a 12 ft. X 8 ft. portable storage building. I~Ir. Groda is proposing a 40 ft. X 40 ft., 2 story addition to be located on the front side of the existing primary structure (See Exhibit A). At the time of the existing building's construction, Zoning Ordinance 4780 was in~..effect. This property was, at that time, zoned for Commercial use and the existing building met all zoning requirements. The building and use of the property (Groda Enterprises has occupied this building since March 1984) were rendered non-conforming with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance ~~1501 (January 26, 1987). As it .is occupied by a non-conforming use, Mr. Groda's building may only be enlarged if a Special Exception is granted by the board. It is for this reason, Mr. Groda has requested a Special Exception under the provisions of Section 11-605.2a. ® • Special Exception Request 8g-001, Page 2 • Section 4-200 states: "The general public, the Planning Commission and the Board are directed to take note that non-conformities in the use and development of land and buildings are to be avoided, or eliminated where now existing, wherever and whenever possible, er.cept when necessary to preserve property rights, specific structures, lots, or uses established prior to tt~e date these regulations became effective as to the property in question, and when necessary to promote the general welfare and to protect the character of surrounding property." As noted earlier, both the existing building and its use (sales and service of fire protection equipment) 'are non-conforming. The building is non-conforming due to failure to meet R-3 setback requirements. Section 4-201 states: "...no non-conforming structure shall be enlarged or extended unless the enlargement or extension can be, and is, made in • compliance with all of the provisions herein established for structures in the district in which the non-conforming structure is located." Section 11-605.2 states: "[to grant a special exception,] the Board [must find] that such special exception will not adversely affect the value and use of adjacent or neighboring property or be contrary to the best public interest." Section 11-60~ 2a continues: "[A special exception to] enlarge or extend a building occupied by a non-conforming use on the lot of record [may be granted] provided that ~the...enlargement does not prevent the return of the property to a conforming use." Y1hen considering a special exception request, the Board must use these ordinance sections as their guide. Ana~sis: • The two (2) lots which make up this tract are comprised of 6250 sq. ft. There is presently 1696 sq. ft. of structure on the property. This constitutes a lot coverage of 27~. The proposed addition would increase lot coverage to approximately 53~• Special Exeption Request 89-001, Page 3 r~ L • The small size of this tract limits the conforming uses to which it could be placed. The only use which this property lends itself to is a single family dwelling. A lot coverage of 53~ exceeds the maximum allowable single family lot coverage by 13ro. Additionally, the type of structures existing and proposed are expressly designed for commercial activities and~are not readily adaptable to residential use. Construction of this addition would therefore make an eventual return of this property to a conforming use much more difficult. Another important issue to be considered is parking. Under current ordinance requirements, the present building requires nine (9) parking spaces. The proposed addition would require an additional ten (10) spaces for a total of nineteen (1g) spaces. The front setback area 1 the addition is built cannot accommodate more than si . (6) parking spac~s_;--i_f ia;r~ n-ut in accordance with ordina ce equir"- ents. Parking for this facility would therefore be very inadequate and as a result, the degree of non-conformity at this location would be greatly 7 increased. Finally, the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the best • interest of the neighborhood must be considered. While the best public interest must be determined by the Board, based on testimony of the applicant and surrounding property owners, staff can speak to Comprehensive plan issues. A review of land use and zoning maps indicate the clear intent to promote residential redevelopment of this area. (see Exhibits B & C). Approval of this request would be clearly contrary to the plan's intent. Conclusion• Construction of this building addition cannot be accomplished in a manner cahich will comply with R-3 zoning requirements. It would make .a return t~o a conforming proper°ty use much more difficult. Inadequate parking would increase the degree of non-conformity on the property. The request is clearly contrary to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: Deny special exception request SE89-001. C] • ;S- • • e _~ ' 1 ~ 1 Y.. :~ '~ b YI'I9I•C ~' ~• ~ N 27• IS' W •A.00• ~- • ~ Olealel,v ur,re uJe ••••"''r _. a _ _- p99-It9T{ IIEry of 61900 toJG 'L• Ah br1wJJ OJ G6A4 G1•ND ~ .. .. rr IJ'NC4JL@ R8T8 MAp (R W) lbiWJJIN -MI[.1. U9. 46yA0~ 9010 D ~, I M+P rsnsov : nbr. 11 n9y . -.1 tUlh 17 To :Qaf1P( 0147 TJ6 atY cP U![RD , TBiYS IlA•s 4PhWty 'i'ce J~w,l( rar, •.rte s•.41 s..lv varau~G+f of C. -'t -~~~ - - - ~ IJ 1JJY•[yM:/8 WITL7 1116 uwa of TIG a•Yn~ oP tiTJ! WV , i1:G Oen W ~+1(py of THE Lll'( of U, !s¢iG . :A.[~ a.•( s.11TJSee vl¢e~tam,IJ.nelo Lo++M.G~J.vBOr SAN JACINTO. AVENUE , i, IcA~,J 4 ov:9~) , AJI Dy+yYSC9rGEp VJp&Q t1+e LAwl~i 9c rlr rycs~ of :p•rA7 t9 PoAaClla T1.ifc PvuFt••naoJ 7F •s.~oJOl,-IV ~,Jv ao9t~•( secs.( MAT TJE erPJa e,iB PaJ 1•r tt+.+a a.JO c.eea~at ; wv nvlr fu./A~elsraJlri, PYCAnls/i, MJIwPh, WGIt pJlYJ1V'~ftJ hlD LGihAL. f!V UY .. / ~ L~14 ~~ ~n~u{ ~s4ewJ eJ TuE Pu~T• (yi' w,or rvyf 1 ,~ i)[ r• `'"••~~~•'`-' LDTS 4 € 5 BLOCK 305 .d:.... Ytwlri sta. WCn.IL 5J1ere(o90 ~b.a~T7A uwiiu:ii+'•• ~ MAP OF LA PORTE '~••••:ral •••:'~~~• IVAI. 60, Pq, 113. M.C. D.R.1 lac S gyp. JOHNSON HUNTER SURVEY A - 3S LL,dC sF D¢vcuPU[.+f : 6Y+mrr EJY61ip'1[1~s LA PORTE ,HARRIS CD., TE1lA5 T{s>a 1F V6J[vpN[rTf : Le.4~lr-su4t~ L P.:.szn: w+aor r..~rearv+,ey EXHIBIT A tv11.a~~•, : 9.11 19.r[ ,IAx.9,19ea H. CARLOS SMITH '-i0~ ZO..t.O: R- r7 ~ o+,.+ - pr ~ [xax[1n9 •xo susr[rons, lxe. ,o. +o. !b 4~9Fi1i : 191b ~~ JtiL•Sf9 '~ ~ PO 8011 529 s2) N N1[Y N6 2275 -[9 - cwmno 1 le PORIf, IER[5 + s+saT I 77572 - 0529 oa 1 - 9rselaw a,r+f uJr .... • •- Iv Awt•( ... • _ ~- ••betalil~~•. ~ ~ S 27•IS'E -Ij 70.00' ' ~ tci I Tsi L Y •• • ). . Ml(.~*. '~ • .+ g ~{irfiJV u .L1, eutwwt+ a ~s [ J ~ ~ , J ;~ ry(,h ~ ~I '~ 3 a" •• I.e ~ [: ? _. o ~~ ~ 1 F r,cun rr ru g • n ~ _ 1'Ro z a 19J0 - Sfoa`! 1rteT~L FslzN,. ~ \ -_ .... I,s1y[r( .. °~ LGTS 1 - 3 LOT 4 LOT S ~~ •• L:TS 6 -9 IIV.) i bA /ie,lOErh W ) r+f L Ir•aaw 3 ... ~ 1W1MUJxa„J9YrrJ,7'l • n%- wn. aN.e•st[e, uBmrlb • w _ 5 r J ) I m -.- - - P~r•T aF 6K:/t 0..•1C77:tith . u _- _. _.. --_ _ - ... .t: _.. .~-. .__ • - '~ ~ ' ` • , ~ • _ ~' ' i~'• y .@ Y ..~ ~ ~ 1 • fd`K R,-~, ~' '~ s ~ ~ ® 4 ;, K \`; 1 C !T. w z • Y. i. ~ n ~ 0 ~ sT. ~ u~ ~R H16H 8CFIOOI. u aaai Ipl_1 C ~ 1150 sc ~ t,~~, Ts ~+: :~ sr 0 R-2 0~ ~_ LA PORTS ~ ~" HIaH SCMOOI ~' ~ GC ~. Y. K C~ l~ 1126 1125 1124 1123 112 1121 o x _. ~ ~ iFJt1' IISS .1156 1157 Ilse IIS9 1160 4430 1431 ALK DR. '/ uTTLE R '~ OIAR BAYOU PARK ~ ` 4 ~~ ~~ ~~ 1193 1192 1191 ~_~~ 1212 _~ ~_ ~ - 1227 ~ ~Y ~ MUHICIPAt. 6Olf R69 1269 1437 ~ ~~ .. 6 ~-~ ". lpUT11 A ST. 1219 CDi[Y000 125. ~~ 1261 v~ o" -, ~T ~--R-I R-2 EXHI~i'i' B • ~ • ~''~''~ '' '. 0 .. , . 0. • .'> ,~ • i: - _ ~ ~ ~ << ... • ~ M `P ~ • • ~f. 'fit ~ '~,s ~ ` • pO • • • • O • • f ~ ` . • • • • • O • • • • • • O ` 1 • • ~ ,• ~? • • ` ~ • • • • • • ~ GA p - ~ • • • ~ s . • ~ ~ • • • • • • ~ ~ . e g • • ~.' . • • • - • • • _. _ • • c r. • • _ • ' ~ • • • ~• ~ A t . ' .~ ~' ~ ' • • R. HIGH ; ' . !. ' T T ~ • ~i • • LB .~t~~, .' • ~ /s1 ~J ~h. • ' • • • © • .' ~~ %, ~'[• • o • • • s • • • • • • •y LA FORTE . ~' "• • • ~ • • • H 18 H SCHOOL • • • • iTT • • • • t • p o IA1.L • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • ~,• ~~ R • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • ~ • • • • • ! ~ y •, :::::~' I ... . ... .. ..... ....: .... :::: ... .f : ' 4 ::: ~^' . .. ~ . ~ '~ r_v urnE i3nY0U PARK ':.. : .. .:::... ...... ...:::' /,. .. .::.. ' 3 ~ ~ ] LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES ,,, . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ MID TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES ;~ _•_• _• COMAIIERCIAL USES ~xH~B~ C • Appeal of F~forcing Officer's Decision -- AP #89-001 • ® CITY OF LA FORTE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPEAL OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S DECISION REC.EI.VED F E B 0 2 1989 CODE ENFORCEMENT. Application Alo.: ~~/ OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant: ~ll~~l ~ ~///~~~ Address I am the owner of the herein described property. I have authorized to act on my behalf in this matter. Owner: Name PH: Address • I am appealing the decision regarding or the interpertation of Sect. of the City Zoning Ordinance No. 1501. I am making this appeal in regards to the property located _L ~ a t ~D ~ S6 G~7 ,/~fffi~S~f-S C D 7~ /~o • ~ ~v2 'T" ~D d /c .~ ~~r.eet_A~dress ~, Legal Description -- (/f Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site Plan ( ) Major Development Site Plan ( ) General Plan A Site Plan of the property is attached. Also, I have listed the information .requested below on the following pages of this form. a) All facts concerning the matter that has led up to this request. b) The type of relief I am seeking (setbacks, lot coverage, etc.). c) The grounds upon which I am making this request. * If applicant is NOT the owner, he must provide Authorization to act on the Owner's behalf. ~ / 4~ ~ ~ ~ e~ Date Applicant's Signature ----------------------------------------------------------------=------ OFFICE USE ONLY Site Plan and Authorization (if applicable) attached? Yes ( ) No ( ) Date transmitted•to the Board of Adjustments: Fleeting Date: Applicant ;notified of Date: Board's•Decision: Approved ( ) Denied ( ) • Notice of Board'Decision mailed to Applicant/Owner: ® • • PAGE 2 If there is not adeo,uate room on the remainder of this form to list all pertinent information, please feel free to attach an additional letter or any information and exhibits you feel the Board should consider. FACTS RELEVAN.T,~TO THIS BATTER ~-r~/ "~~ ~y'~9~~/f-~ eves f- ~li!/~~e. ~~ /1/O~ /~. /r~', ., • /~/~7~ ~.~ "' ~U S7~ 4/u ~ 5"fYee~S ! by ,~~/~`~ , T~er~ ~s~~ ~ / - ~1 A _// ~~ w / /7 rev f _ L /_ G ~/ lJ 1.~ S // TYPE OF RELIEF BEING SOUGHT: v u~~ 1~ L/'k~ 7b IC~acu c~/~e~~ his ~1~~~~,,~'~~ ~,~c~r~ ~~•~ i~~~•~%~ ~~~~~~ GROUNDS FOR°THE REQUEST: n i n n ~ ~~ ~/~ s~ 6~,~~~5 z~i,s ,~~~ / ~~ ~L~~ ~ ;~. ~ ~ hog ~~~ ~f ~~ ~/~y v~,~i~~~~' G%T~ D~s~zo/J~y~ ~~ ~o7L~~~yy s~~,~~k ® • • FIST OF ADDRESSES h~fi0 H.A~T CJjRPORTS IIv THE C'IT~ O. LA PC~TE 506 S. Kansas 602 S. Kansas 611 S. Kanc~,~ 623 S. Kansas 805 S. Kansas 817 S. Kansas 821 S. Kansas' 514 S. Iowa 517 S: Iowa 522 S. Iowa 606 S. Virginia X13 S. Utah 615 S. Idaho 618 S. Idaho 619 S. Idaho 431 S. 7th St. 632 S. 2nd St. 710 S. 2nd St. 811 S. 2nd St. 810 S. 2nd St. 910 S. 2nd St. ® ® • RECEI.YED RIJILDING PERMIT NOV 16 1988 ~ Jurisdiction of l DE ENFORCEMENT y. pplicant to complete numbered spaces on toe ADOR Ess 7d / s• ~ ~.vs~ s LEGAL LOT NO. ~ ~~ ~~D/ ~~ BLK ~ /~ TRACT ~ (^3[C ATTACNCD 3NEET) 2DWNER/_ ~ • • .~ 'v~~~IV !D/ D~/ is/ 1 S 2!J 7/ I / ~~/ D CONTRACTOR 3 MAIL ADDRESS PNONC REGISTRATION NO. ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE REGISTRATION NO. 4 ENGINEER '. ... MAIL ADDRESS PNONC REGISTRATION NO. 5 L CNOER MAIL ADORLSS BRANCH 6 USE OF BUILDING ~ 8 Class of work: O NEW lJ ADDITION ~ ALTERATION G REPAIR ^ MOVE ~ REMOVE 9 Describe work: ~'<~~~ ~d X `~' L~J~~~T.- ~N ~ ~~ ~/ /'-~T 'rlv~~il/ ~/~ C 5 yp fi w-.). e~ D O r~ N O 10 Valuation of work: S ~J/C~eR~ O~ TT C/ PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Type of Occupancy Const. Group Division Size of Bldg. No. of Max. (Total) Sq. Ft. Stories Occ. Loatl Fire Use Fire Sprinklers APPLICATION ACCEPTED eT PLANS CHECKED av. APPROVED FOR ISSUaNCE ev Zone Zone Required ryes ^No NO. Ot Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered NOT 1 C E Special Approvals Required Received Not Required SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- zoNING ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CON- HEALTH DEPT. STRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN s FIRE DEPT. MONTHS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS AT ANY TIME AFTER SOIL REPORT WORK IS COMMENCED. ~ OTHER (Speclry) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ~I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AU TN ORI2ED AGENT (DATE) SIGNATURE OF NCR IF OWNER BU IL DE RI IDATEI WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT PLAN CHECK VALIDATION •cK. M.o. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH A•1 5 CUSTOMER COPY ~• SAIESCHECK NUMBER SEi~RS, ~~rR~OEBUCKvr~-ND O. ff TYPE C)F IAlcT61 ~ ennN DIV..' D/AT/E7 tf t STORE ADDI;FSS ~~//-~ ~ITY ST 7E LP CODE STORE PHONE OMER'S NAME r• HOME PHONE OFFICE PHONE ADDRESS / CITY STATE LP CODE _ INSTALLATION ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT CITY STATE ZIP CODE a,asnreKwn t~ crtEC7C REQUIRED AGTIVIiIES AND SPEC]FY ON PROPOSAL ^ PREPARATION ^ PLUMBING ^ SHEET METAL ^WflLL-FLOOR-CEILINGS ^ CLEAN UP ^NON-INSTALLED ^ CARPENTRY ^ ELECTRICAL ^ CONCRETE ^ DECORATING ^ CUSTOMER AGREES ^ SPECIFICATIONS: Sears offers to furnish and arrange for the delivery and installation of: ~. _ .- I • :.. ~ ;~ {_ -~ •t ~~ 1 ~~ ~1 I . _. i. t , -- - - - - - '"+I ,G~ i I ..~- I ~~~ c~~ r k, ) t r I f IN57ALLATION ESTIMATED I understand that this is only an estimated date and I will be TO BEGIN WEEK OF contacted prior to this dote to schedule the actual installation date. (CASH PRICE) ~, j Customer can bu (pA~) y For information regarding <j~o at this price until: your installation call: ] SC ^ SC/MCP ~C ^ SUBMITTED BY , ~ ~/ !J ~ ~ C S (SALESPER N) APPROVED BY (MGR.) (ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS OF THIS PROPOSAL ARE STATED ON REVERSE SIDE.) •'••. (Customer's Signature) (Spouse's Signature) (Dote) If sale is made in location other than Sears premises, YOU, THE BUYER, MAY CANCEL THIS TRANSACTION AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO MIDNIGHT OF THE THIRD BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DATE OF THE TRANSACTION. SEE THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF CANCELLATION FORM FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS RIGHT. isbla-010 Rey. 1/87 (See Bul. 0.187 Rey. Port 1 Supp. tll) CUSTOMER RECEIPT PATIO COVERS & CARPORTS • • a. <.~ - LL-800 MODELS INCLUDE: ,. 1. ROLL FORMED PAN STYLE s°V-PAN ROOF LL-500 OR LL-800 2. "LE" EXTRUDED .072 ALUMINUM SECTIONS 3. "LG" EXTRUDED .072 ALUMINUM SECTIONS 4. 3" X 3" EXTRUDED ALUMINUM POST/ FLUTED DESIGN TRIM: 2" SNAP IN TRIM AVAILABLE IN FOLLOWING COLORS WHITE BROWN BEIGE GOLD WOODGRAIN WHEN ORDERING SPECIFY: A PAN COLOR: WHITE /IVORY LL-500 ,. B. BRONZE OR WHITE FRAME C. BRONZE OR WHITE POST 12" FLAT PAN HOUSTON DALLAS SAN ANTONIO AUTHORIZED DEALER: • Request: AP 89-001 L J Type of Request: Appeal of the Enforcing Officer's decision to deny a building permit based on non-compliance with Section 5-700, Table B (front yard setback.~•) of Ordinance 1501. Requested For: 701 South Kansas Leal Description: Lts 1, 2 & 20 ft. of It 3; blk 263; La Porte Tract (see~Exhibit A) Owner: Billy B. Lamar Zoning: R-1, Low Density Residential Back>?round & Analysis: On 1\rovember 16, 1988, P1r. Billy Lamar made'- application for a building per•r;iit for construction • of an eighteen foot by eighteen foot (18' ~ 18") carport to be attached to the front of his house located at 701 South ::ansas Street. P. review of the permit application indicated that as proposed, the carport could not be built. A1r. Lamar was informed of this. N?r. Lamar subsequently requested an appeal of this decision. On January 3,. 1989 t1r. L.arnar's permit application. was forr„ally denied in order for the appea? process to be initiated. This permi'c was c~Fnied based on the proposed car•ports's failure to meet the setback requirements c~ SF~:i.~c~r! 5-700, Table B of City Zoning Ordinance 1501 (see Exhibit B). This table specifies a front yard setback of twenty-five (25) feet for single family homes located in residential zoning districts. The garage of hir. Larrar's hone .~.s setback exactly twenty-five (25) feet from tY;e front property line. There is no area forward of this line which may be occupied by a roofed structure. Exhib:~t G indicates the location of the twenty-five (25) foot front setback line on this property. It also indicates the location of A•ir. Lamar's propo:~ec; carport. The entire carport, if ® constructed, would clearly encroach into the required setback area and be in violation of the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Q? 89-G01 Cont'd CJ • Conclusion: Denial of this permit was proper under the r~ec;u~r~er;,Er,t~ of City Zoning Oi°dinance 4x1501. Recommendation: Deny this appeal to the enforcement Officer's decision. • _:- .~ ' RFVICM'O BT LAri DCPA>'NC-:7 _ . ... ~ _ _ ..... - . i._. .. ..~:.. .i ..... .... RI.~L 4'7A'i 1!!VC6TM.[NTS .. ~ .. 1 • i ' ... . Ci LI( PO/2T~ ._-- .i :: _, i`~ .,-~ ._....L._v% i,~n (':T.~i O~'y L ^.__/`~l72'../~ ~... ~. Texas accord in' ._ l!~.cr~ ' _,;'1:'. :~>.,.•~-ri,. :r. V:+'u:.-, 60 ~~• --.--_r, >, ;~ ~ - ~- . ~ 1 ~ ~ , } i i ~ - p ~ 1 . 1 ~ ,, L ~ 0 1 • ~ : ~" ~ ' .~ 1 1 . t I ~ 1 :: ~ I ~; i . ~ '~ ~ „ ~ . i ' ~ ~ ~ ,I' js ':'r; f::s. r~; ~/s r 22.07 ~ ;~ ` 1 z., ~ iS ~;. 1.S I 20.5 ~ ~_ 1 a ~ I '~ ~' .'Coi7CiCf ~. ~ '~ t~ 1 ' RECEIVED ~~ 1 ` -. ''': • ' rr ~ '~ ` - • ate' .,so :tip ., ~ ~ -- FEB U 2 1989 ! '~ i z~.3 ,.... I ~: _ : .: ~:I ~o' j~ ~,=~.~ CODE ENFORCEMENT ~ c .1= I k SOv~h /~a.nsws . .- -29- USES (SIC CODE ~~) ~ ZONES R-1 R-2 R-3 MH Tool Houses, Sheds, Storag e Building (Non-Commercial Associated with Residence) A A A A Boarding or Renting of Roo ms (1 person max.) A A A A Off-Street Loading~(Refer ~to Sect. 10-700) * * A Off-Street Parking (Refer to Sect. 10=600) A A A A Petroleum Pipelines (Restr icted to existing pipeline corridors) P P ~ P P Residential Density Bonus, as provided in Sect. 5-800 G C C C C Secondary Dwelling Units C P P -700 Table B - Residentia l 2,3,4 5,6,10 7* 8~ Min. Min. Min. Max. Min. Min. Max. Lot Uses Lot Lot Yard Height Site Devel. Coverage/ Area/D.U. Width Setbacks Area/ Open Sp./ Min. Land- S.F. L.F. L.F. Unit Unit scaping F.R.S. S.F. S.F. Req. 9 Single 9100 Family 6000 50 25-15-5 35 Ft. 4.8 -- 40~/N/A Detached DU/A Single Family 43560 Large 43560 100 25-15-5 45 Ft. 1.0 -- 30~/N/A Lot DU/A ' Single Family 7300 Special 4500 40 20-10-0 35 Ft. 6.0 Footnote 60~/N/A L•ot, 0 DU/A ~~ 1 ~ ~~ Lot Line ~xH~tsi~' ~ - - t ~. ~- - . -•• '•- . -'- -'--•.---• ptYl[''t;[D BT LAK' DC~A~MiKT _~ . i:. .. _.. __...... _. •... ! .......,... 3'..... i:i. RLII [+'TA~L 1!:VCLTY.[MTD .. . .. . 1 .:?: .a. cf l.t Pool ~-~ --- _i:: _. ;:: ::~. ,..:i._:.,: `... i::;~ CT ; of ~ ;•--r•~~-::~~__.----_..-- Texas accorc in . _ l'i!.C ~ ~'1 ~'. : ~:,.•~-;i• :r. '•1:~'.u:,- G o - _ _ 'r. .. //2 •~_ ..it,'. L ~f:J ;:...,., .::s o: __ f ~.o ,iris '. C~ cif%TY ---•.~. : ~.:~=•. ! i ~ ; .... ... i i... 1 t..• ; i... !! ~ rr • •: .T ~ - -- { \ i i t . I _ • ! t • E~ J . ,; ~° . • 1 ~ ~ , ~ . i . ' ::.~ .. ~, ,_ ; ; ~, ~ . i , I, ~~~ ~i ~ ` ~ LJ• - -~ ,mi 4~ l .. ,, . ., : , ~~ . ~. ~` ' i `, ~ ~ ~ i G t ' ` ~! t 1S. 9 s...v _~ ~ ?1 ~ \; ~ ~J ~~ 1'y ~ t;~ . u" _ RECEIVED ~' ~ ~ FEB 0 2 1989 CODE ENFORCEMENT ~~' ./l.J i'1~ w ~. ;. .. •~, .; 1 i ' ' • . •` ;;, .~; ~~ 1 1 2O.i ~~ l~ i t 1 9 ~ t i i. ~:s 1 i -- .. i 1 ~ .. -. ~ •i .~ . ~ ~ . i ~; • ,t , :;r~^ i ~ \ i~j ~ F:r::s 't i-1- ~ ,~~L--1 ~T ~ J`• 1 1 ~ \ is ;;::. ~ ~~ -., O°~'•:lf.,•.~%9?~/L'~.f ~;.' l ILS 20.5' ~ 9 ` ~~SY.% ' ~ •Igtx IB' ~rj ~f. r/-dn ~ ~ i • Sctba,ck !,i-t ~' P,•oPos~~ c~.l.nol.t EXHtBf1i C South /Cap=ar e ~ • Appeal of Enforcing Officer's Decision __ AP #39-002 • U ' . ' ® CITY OF LA PORTS ~ RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FEB 2~ 1989 APPEAL OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S DECISION • -------------------------- CODE ENFORCEMEN_T_ ------------------------------ Application No.: ~-~~ OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: ~•.~-3 -br1T ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant: Name ~ J~7 _~ J3.tlt1 Lllnnr-l h- (?~•~". ~ /7.x Address PH . c / G~J I am the owner of the herein described property. I have authorized to act on my behalf in this matter. Owner: Name Address PH: I am appealing the decision regarding or the interpertation of Sect. of the City Zoning Ordinance No. 1501. I am making this ~ peal i egards to the property to ated . a t ~1~-?~, b'ryt: ~~ 1 c ~~ 7 ,° Lo7s S, 9° ~ A Po~Z-~ Street Address Legal Description ~- • (/~ Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site Plan ( ) Major Development Site Plan ( ) General Plan A Site Plan of the property is attached. Also, I have listed the information requested below on the following pages of this form. a) All facts concerning the matter that has led up to this request. b) The type of relief I am seeking (setbacks, lot coverage, etc.). c) The grounds upon which I am making this request. * If applicant is NOT the owner, he must provide Aut orization to act on the Owner's behalf. Date Applican`t's Signature 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY Site Plan and Authorization (if applicable) attached? Yes ( ) No ( ) Date transmitted to the Board of Adjustments: ~~eeting Date: Applicant ;notified of Date: Board's Decision: Approved ( ) Denied ( ) • Notice of Board Decision mailed to Applicant/Owner: ` j • PAGE 2 If there is not adequate room on the remainder of this form to list all pertinent information, please feel free to attach an additional letter or any information and exhibits you feel the Board should consider. • TYPE OF RELIEF BEING SOUGHT: • • Request: AP89-002 Type of Request: Appeal to the Enforcing Officer's decision to deny a building permit for an addition to an existing commercial building. Permit was denied for failure to comply with the requirements of Ordinance ;1501, Section 6-500, Table B. Requested For: Garza's Tire & Mechanic Shop 318 North 8th St., La Porte, Texas Legal Description: Blk 77, Lots 8 & 9; La Porte Tract (See Exhibit A) Owner: t;oe Garza Zoning: General Commercial (G.C.) Background: On February 16, 1989, Mr. Noe Garza submitted a certified_ site plan (C.S.P.) for review. C.S.P. review and approval is the required first step for obtaining a building permit for • commercial construction. On February 21, 1989, this site plan was reviewed and disapproved (See Exhibit B). Disapproval was primarily based on t}ie pr•or~osed addition's failure to comply with City Zoning and Fire Code requirements. On February 22, 1989, in order to initiate the appeal process, Mr. Garza submitted a building permit application which was denied by the Code Enforcement staff (See Exhibit C). Specific areas cf non-compliance with zoning requirements were as follows. 1. Addition would cause maximum allowable G.C. lot coverage of 40~ to be" exceeded by 900 square feet or approximately 10~ (Section 6-500, Table B; See Exhibit D) 2. Addition would encroach f9.fteen (15) feet into the required ttaenty (20)~ feet rear set-back area (Section 6-500, Table B). 3. There is not adequate room on the property to deveicp required parking. As an existing building, the present parking is a given. However, additional parking would be required for any building addition. To comply with current ordinance requirements .all parking spaces and maneuvering room must be contained on premise. .4 A total of ten (10) parking spaces (8 for the existing • building and 2 for the proposed addition) would be required. Parking for this establishment is limited to a 34.4 ft. X 50 ft. area located in front of the building. Using any parking arrangement currently allowed by ordinance (See Exhibit E), no more than four parking spaces could be developed on this property. As noted earlier, in addition to these zoning problems, the site plan review noted the problem of inadequate fire protection. The City's Fire Code requires a fire hydrant to be located within three hundred (300) feet of the furthest point of a building. This distance is measured along the lines the fire department would have to follow when laying down a hose during a fire. An additional fire hydrant would be necessary in order to provide required fire protection to a building addition in this location. Conclusion: Under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 11-604.3, the Board, in order to grant an appeal must find the following conditions to be met. A. That there is a reasonable difference of interpretation as to the specific intent of the zoning regulations or • zoning map, provided the interruption of the enforcement officer is a reasonable presumption and the zoning ordinance is unreasonable. B. That the resulting interpretation will not grant a special privilege to one property inconsistent with other properties or uses similarly situated. C. The decision of the Board must be in the best interest of the community and consistent with the spirit and interest of the City's zoning laws and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of La Porte. Regarding this appeal, the provisions of Section 6-500 are very clear. There has been no evidence presented to indicate a misinterpretation on staff's part as required by paragraph a. Secondly, granting this appeal would show special privilege to this property. The special privilege would result in the reduction of setback, lot coverage, and parking requirements entailed in an approval of this request. This would be contrary to the requirements of paragraph b. While it determine the • this appeal, "consistent w ordinance and is the Board's charge, under paragraph c, to "best interest of the community" when ruling on staff feels granting this request would not be ith the spirit and interest of the City's zoning the Comprehensive Plan." Recommendation: Deny this appeal to the Enforcing Officer's decision. • • • b '~ ~ I I w ~ :1J7Ap~~' N :.. •:• :• D: ~ w i r) ~Xd> U,11: ~ 1~ ~I' - ~ EAST - 125.00' N ~ ' I a ~ ~ I I ~ ~N . i3 I I ~ o -'-!• d--I-- '. ~ ,. ~_~_ 3 ~ III I _ I o p 1` Z N ; ~ ~ fI I LOT B nl ~>•Iy ~ tal: t\ :V ~ v^ -; a :~ v . ~L- ~ nAE i AL fsi(.075 :J• •' LOT 9 ~_. % ~~ • /. I ` I II ~- ; WEST '. - 125.00' / .~ I+~ I .s • • 5 ~>. ua~ ~' IAVt=tu.A ~''GPiJ4v-(7 312 '.~• ~1L~ `~• -S . ~fi ...,i:;.:, ADAMS (~~ B17) STREET ''• ~k ii~(nrA.Jt 2rvo' ~dn.l of yul. lurz. EoT °~ 1'rnporty 1 [c:; in Fl.,nd 7..roa• "C" ns .:h.,a:n n•, Fvtae Fl;+od Incur:mcu Rata; :•1::p (FII(:•+.) fonnunit+• 1'ancl `Eo. 583487 0010 D Nnp R(•visa•d: auv. 1. 1983 Thic 1s to rcrtiiy that the City ui 1.:: Pnrtc. Tv7tas bas appnrvcd this cita• plan and dcvrl.q,n,•ut .,i ___ in r~ginrm.,m•v with [ha !.a:•c of the State .~i 'fo±:•tti and the .+rdlnnaros ni tha• City .,( La r„rte. • I, Rrcin :\. Ul:.,n, n:r. ra•Listert•d urdrr thr I::vx ui tht• State uC 'rcxn5 u, prartir,• the pr:,fc~ni.:n .•1 ::urva•a•inl; :aid Catchy rvr[iia that thv abnvo city pl.u+ i. trua• and rc,r n•rt; and that all hv.:ring::, dict.utr r:;. ::agl ec, ru r:•a• r;:diuca•s and rantral.rogla~ ar.• n••rurntolr ch..•.•n .,n [Iw plat. .`~.~g OF•T~?. TIiS.1S R~CC1STIiR1:D I'CIi1.IC SI:RPl41'(.7R :<0. S3Y•:%• :n: .. ':~ KEVIN A: •OISGH • l.OiS 3 :nui 9. h1.UCF: i 7 :'ar u:~ 1.:\ rokTr. .IUIi::SU:: I!t:::'fl:i: SL'N.t'I:1'. \-'15 1:1 i'Ok'1'1:, iI,1RRIS (:ll"::'I'1', l'I:\..S il 3 _s ~ ~'I ,; .•~ I 'a ~~ >~I ~, _, a -"i• ~.s ~- I N •~ I a S ,. ~' ~~~ ~ t~ :<.\)II: t)1' 171:Fi:i.tli'}iF:::T: l::\R%:\'S TiRi. ;.:7r:CIiA::iC 5330P T'il'I:~t)I' D!:1'i:l.Dr:•:I:::T: l:D::CRI:I'!: SL:~:I (Il:.{I:ItS: GCS IiRiliD1:S IU15 $. ?%:7 51'. Iil' 1 I.:)I:RS LO::I:D: GIiC1:R:11. CO`1)11ikC Int. JUB .\llDRI•:SS: l18 ::. 8711 S'I'i(lil:l' EXHI~~T A RECEIVED FEB 16 ~ggg CODE ENFORCEMENT. DATE '~~~~• '"• 1')77e H. CARLOS SMITH ~ SCALE 1"=zo' ORAwN }~=\~~ ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS, INC. ' ~ •~ . • °' P.O. BOX 529 423 N. Mv1Y. 146 ~ JOe NO. '-783-89 CHECKED - LA PORTE. TEX4$ 7 7 572 - 0529 SHEET OF ; I r. . r... ;~ ,; ~. ~~-~~~`~~~~~ ~~~'+~~ CITY OF LA ~t.;Xr~:~~. ~:~~: c,rr~. ,-Y fi ~~{~i,~~~A _+.~,,.::~-ter PMOwE X713) 471.5020 • P. O. Box 1115 .. ~9~ i i13'ar1%': r :~:y~ ~ ~~ ~~ ;"art ~7~i y'~ ~' ltec PORTE • LA PORT E. TEXAS 77571 .` FILE COPY February 21, 1989 Garza's Tire & Mechanic Shop 318 N. 8th Street ' La Porte, Tx 77571 RE: Building Addition - 318 ~N. 8th Street CLP Project No. 89-8205 Dear Mr. Garza, In accordance with the City of La Porte Development Ordinance and other pertinent codes and ordinances the site plan review committee • has reviewed the above referenced project on February 21, 1989. The project was disapproved at this time because of the following reasons: 1) No fire protection within three hundred feet (300') of the building addition. Any questions can be directed to Mr. Paul Hickenbottom the City's fire marshal. 2)~ Zoning Ordinance No. 1501 regulates the following items. __~ A) Maximum lot coverage in a General Commercial (G.C.) zone is forty percent (40~) or 2500 square feet on the two lots in question. The addition would exceed this restriction. B) For G.C, zoned property adjoining residential zoned property, the minimum rear building setback is twenty feet (20'). C) Additional parking would be required if an addition is built. D) For G.C. zoned property, a landscaping requirement of six percent (6%) w~oul'd apply if are addition is built. 3) ~ The site plan ref'lects~three (3) lines leaving the power pole and crossing the intended building location. Houston Lighting and Power may wish to address this if the addition is built. 4) If the addition is built, signature blocks for the•Approving Authority Certificate would need to be shown on the approved site plan. Once the above items are satisfied, a new site plan must be filed for Department approval. If you feel the disapproval was unjust, enclosed is 'an application for appeal of the Enforcement Officer's • Decision. This completed application and a denied building permit would enable staff to schedule this Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting. No applic•a~tion fee is necessary. EXHIBIT B a ~I Garza's Tire/Nfech. Shop Con't..... Page 2 • ~~ If you have any questions or if we may be of assistan:ce:,_ please feel free to contact my staff at (713) ~~471-5020. Respectfully, ~~~J Ervin J. r' it Chief Bui ing i icial EJG/dsw Enclosure xc: B. Sterling P. Hickenbottom C. Herrod B. Fitzsimmons H. Carlos Smith - P. 0. Box 529 - La Porte, Tx 77572-0529 • ~XHIBE~° ~ • .~ ~ ~ • BUILDING r, ~ERIVIIT Jurisdiction of ~ a ~ pplicani io complete numbered spaces only. _ boa ADDR ESS l S 111, $ sir . ~~ ~~f~- ..._ .._..-- ..._. -. _. -- -... _ ._•__.__. ....-. __. .--.- -, LEGAL DESCR. LOT NO. aLR TRACT ,,: i1,,-~~%G }'Si' ~SC[ATTACNCD SMECT) I ~ i OWN(a~ , MAIL ADDRCaa ~ 1'S~ ~ ^-' .r~1: ~r1 //~J~ 21P E I / ^/ ./v•- / / rt~NON _.- __._ I __-.,_ - ~'_ _ 1 CONTRACTOR MAII ADDRC35 ~ -- PNONC REGISTRATION NO. s ~ T~ ~ ... ----,--- - - --• AR CNI TCCT OR OESI6N [R ~-'-• MAIL ADDR [53 PHONE REGISTRATION NO. ~ • 4 ~ ~ I EN 6IN EER MAIL AooR ESS ~-_--• -"-" PNON[ •'~ -~-' REGISTRATION NO. I i r I LENOCR MAIL ADDRESS ~ aRANCN .... _. ._ 6 .. • . i • a!. I ~ 1 . ... .. -_....-._....-__ .-. .-_-- ._._ ._. ._ __..-.-_ .. -..-_._-~-_.-...~..~.___-__~.__.-__-__ USL Of aY1LDIN6 ~ , • + I .. •:.. . • 'I li Class of work: : D NEW ^ ADDITION ^ ALTERATION D REPAI R ^ MOVE D REMOVE j • ' ; 9 Describe work: " G 70 Valuation of work: $ "'• ~• • - '• ~' ~ •• ' ~ ' ' PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE ' ' SPECIAL CONDI IONS: '• Type or • • Occupancy - .- .1 Const. Group ~ Division ' ' - ~ `- - -'- ~ ~~` ~ Size o1 Bldg. - No. of Max. - i:.• • • ' ~ ,.... ~ - ~ (Total) Sq. Ft. ~ Stories Occ. Load rq:y;': '~ •' Fire -- Use Fire Sprinklers , ,~~; APPLICATION ACCE PTEO BY. PLANS CtIE CKED eY: APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE eY. ZOne ZOrle ~ Required ^Yes 'M DNO ?" ~ ~ : : ` • No of OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: . 1..5 . ~, . • - '• - - ' ' •• . Dwelling Untts Covered . ti, •.~ R Uncovered .' .r'•1`' ~d' ..~::. - • ~'~ ' ' '}'~ ~ • N O T I C E ~ -:~: - , ~ Special Approvals Required Received Not Required ,:- SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- zoNING - '• ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ~ ' ` ~ THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CON- • HEALTH DEPT. ~'" • STRUCTION AUTHORIZED• IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN s FIRE DEPT. - • MONTHS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR SOIL REPORT .ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. OTHER (Speclry) - ' 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO l>IVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS Off' ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. SIONATYRC Of CON TRAC TON O A TNORI2ED AGCNT IOATEI 51 NAT R O OWNER Ir OWNER eU ILD IOATCI WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT ••_ PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH EXHIBIT Ci` A•1 0 -41- . Section 6 - 500 Table B - Commercial (2,6) (1,3,4,6) Adj. to Min. Min. Res. Land- Max. Yard Min. Yard scaping ~ Lot Setbacks Setback Max. Uses Reo. 5 ~•-~ Cov. .F. R. S. F. R. S. Hei hg t R-3 Uses Density Intensity Regulations _ Specified (Permitted) 6~ in Table B, Residential, Sect. 5-700 CR Comm. Recreation _ Dist.; all permitted or conditional NC Neighborhood Comm.; all per- 6~ 50~ 20-10-0 20-10-10 45 Ft. miffed or condi- -- tional GC General Comm.; . all permitted or 6$ 40% 20-10-0 20-20-10 45 Ft. conditional Outside sales ~ N/A N/A 5-5-5 Same as Prin- N/A or services ciple Use ' ~ See Outside storage N/A N/A 20-10-5 Same as Prin- Sect. ciple Use 6-600B Freestanding On Premise See Section 10-1000 Signs Freestanding On Pr emise See Section 10-1000 Signs located in Controlled Access Highway Corridors 6 - 501 Footnote- 1 . A minimum~.lan . ~ be required adjacent to a ings, parking areas,.loadir ~ ~ tainers will not be allowe to be land- scaped with t anting plan required to t E~CH~gt~ ~ .g officer. r' i ~_ -77- 9D' 29= G5 ~1 c~~ . ~p ]' - ` ~ ~~ o: ~ , ~~ ~ '8. h ~ , 5 7 ¢5 _j' ~c - N ~s_ ti ~ h, N ~_ M v ~. ¢ FIGURE 1~~-1 ~xH[BCi' ~