Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-25-1989 Public Hearing and Regular Meeting• MINUTES • ® LA PORTE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MINUTES OF MAY 25, 1989 Members Present: Deborah Bernay, Jack Parson, Gladys Roth, Jody Seeger Members Absent: Jack Humphrey City Staff Present: Joel Albrecht, Director of Community Development; 0+hers Present: Peter John, R. L. Guiilet 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Lice Chairman Deborah Eernay at 7:11 P.J°i. 2. CONSIDER APPROYII•:G MINUTES OF ~FlAY 25, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING & REGULAR MEETING A motion was made by Gladys Roth, seconded by Jody Seeger to approve the minutes as read. The vote was unanimous and the motion carried. 3. CONSIDER SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST ~SE89-002 t~;r. Albrecht presented staff's report. The iccation of the property for review is located at 217 1/2 Garfield; Ptorth 1/2 of lots 1~;-16; Elock 5; Sylvan Beach Addition. The Zoning :Ordinance requires a t~ti=enty-five (25) foot front y2rd setback. He1•rever, Section 11.6O5.2.b.1 allo~F=s "ar.y exception from the front yard requirements where the actual front yard setbacl; cf any abutti;~g lot does not meet the front yard requirer~ent." Peter and Jan John are requesting a t~•rer.ty (20) foot front yard setback. The house next door to the Johr.'s property has a front setback of seventeen (17) feet, sir. (6) inches. The proposed new home can't be setback to the t.=est dt:e to existing service lines and to the back there is an existing slab and drive. According to Section 11.605 the applicant r;;ust meet two specific requirements. The first being specific requirements which apply tc the applicant and the second being the valve of adjacent property will not be adversely affected or contrary to public interest. Air. Albrecht pointed out that the first reo,uirer~lent i.s satisfied given the front setback of the house located next door. The MIIvLTES, ~iAY 25, 189 • PAGE 2 second being satisfied due to P•~r. Johns consistant contact with neighboring property et~rners. Staff recommends a favorable decision by the board. lair. Peter John presented sworn testimony. Mr. John stated that he ' purchased this property approximately five (5) ,years ago. In con~•idering placement of his home it would be too expensive to tear out the existing slsb and replace the existing service lines. These problems are what led to tl:e decision of a twenty (20) foot setbac-k. Mr.~~John also stated that during the entire planning process of placement and construction of his home he has remained in contact with his neighbors. N,r. Oriel Guillet cf 215 Garfield, neighboring property owner, presented sworn testimony. Pir. Guillet asked the Board if a storm came through and caused considerable damage to his home if he taould be reouired to ask for a special exception. 1~',r. Albrecht advised the Board that during Huricane Alicia the La Porte City Council ruled the property o~aners on t:he bay would be allowed to replace damaged property if the damage was 50~ or more. Mr. Albrecht stated that the Council may not rule the same again but that there would be consideration for property owners. A1r. Guillet stated that he would only hope for the same consideration under sucYi circumstances. After no further discussion, Glade-s Roth made a motion to grant Special Exception ~~85-C02 as presented and revietaed. Jack Parson seconded the motion. The motion carried with a unanimous vote. 4. ADJOURN The r;eetirg t•:as adjourned by Vice Chairman Deborah Bernay at 7:35 P.l~i. P.espectfully submitted, A+artha under:., 5ecr•etary I~:inutes approved on __ U day of June, 1989• Deborah Bernay Bice Ch2irmar, ® • APPEAL #89-003 • e • ® CITY OF LA PORTE ~ RECEIVED ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPEAL OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S DECISION JUId 05 198g CdDE ENFORCEMEd~__ ---------------------------------------------Pp-------------- ----- ~ A lication No ~~1- DU ~ OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: ------------------------------////------------------ - --- Applicant: /,~~i~~.,~~, /~f~i%2~c~ Name ` Address 7 75G~ ' I am the owner of the herein described property. I have authorized to act on my behalf in this matter. Name ~ c~f~`/~75 Address 7~S5q I am ap Baling the decision regarding or the interpertation of Sect. - 7oG of the City Zoning Ordinance No. 1501. I am making this appeal in regards to the property located at Street Address Le al Descripthon !' n~ ~ S/~C ~ %~ ® ~~~'rC~ (~ Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site Plan ( ) Major Development Site Plan (~~ General Plan A Site Plan of the property is attached. Also, I have listed the information requested below on the following pages of this form. a) All facts concerning the matter that has led up to this request. b) The type of relief I am seeking (setbacks, lot coverage, etc.). c) The grounds upon which I am making this request. ~ If applicant is NOT the owner, he must provide Authorization to act on the Owner's behalf. // i~ ~Dat Applicant's Signature ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE USE ONLY I ,~ Site Plan and Authorization (if applicable) attached? Yes (/) No ( ) Date transmitted to the Board of Adjustments: ~ /~7 ~~ ~/ ~ - P4eeting Date: 7/` 1 ~!-!~ Applicant ;dotified of Date: sn~~' ~ Board's Decision:- .~ Approved ( ) Denied ( ) ® Notice of Board Decision mailed to Applicant/Owner: • 1 ' • • PAGE 2 If there is not adequate room on the remainder of this form to list all pertinent information, please feel free to attach an •additional letter or any information and exhibits you feel the Board should consider. FACTS RELEVANT TO THIS ~•fATTER: -zon~in-6 02nrrv~e~vc~ ~ So~9-~',~~z,.~ f3c~/~~,~iv~ GoD~ ,~,~:--..v~ ~ /t g-~~ c,~Y'rD ~~~ .: ~~ S ~.s ~~ /i.~ ,~ c vim-, ~,,a..y ivw ~~G.. -- ro i T /r•ti~ ~-2E,~ 9-~~, oi° i 6 ~9 ~ . DG~.~..L s s vt3rh X9-9-~'~ -~ . .S~YOcu ~ ~i17/z A 6~~ 3'- ~/~ ~C> ryi ~'l~ Go.t-~-,~ c ~~~ -~ ,i ^5/L /f E Z. C G~9~ ' 3r/~'1" s S.a /r~ ~.L.~ /3/~ . c~~~vS i i.~,~i° ~.~ ~ D !z ~/d c-~i'-i~i ~ ~iP-/~ o E v TYPE OF RELIEF BEING SOUGHT: /~L L ~~GcJ ~ c~~ti rz' ~ 9'/~~ ~ /~i~ l ~ ~ .~ G~AC~ ~i 9-!T' ,~~r" I . s9-/: L ~" /~Gll% /,pL-/~i-/ ~'l;l/~ /..~~i,9•rtc%9i~i' C~'~R.d6/~'_ !!/f~1- s//i.r~~.~" 9-e R /z ~a 2 I/~f! /2/J ~/I~-/b - GROUNDS FOR THE REQtJ~EST CED/1-'87 ® • ® APPEAL TO THE ENFORCING OFFICER'S DECISION Appeal ~A89-00~ Requested for: 1023 Hackberry (See Exhibit A) Legal Description: Blk 10; Lot 4; Shady River, Sect III Requested Bv: .. ~~Wil~liam Herrick, Owner Background• On may 25, 1989, the City of La Porte rejected a building permit application from Mr. William Herrick (See Exhibits B & C). The permit, for construction of a new single family home, was rejected for failure to meet the rear setback requirements of the zoning ordinance. Section 5-700, Table B of the ordinance requires rear yard setback of fifteen (15) feet. As originally proposed, a two car garage was to be attached to the house by means of a covered patio/breezeway (See Exhibit D). There is a five (5) foot utility easement located at the rear of this property. The garage was to abutt this utility easement. Mr. Herrick believes the City is misinterpreting the zoning ordinance by considering the garage and patio to be part of the primary structure and therefore subject to the fifteen (15) foot rear setback requirement. He contends that the garage/patio should be considered as a detached accessory structure. Detached accessory structures only reouire a rear setback of three (3) feet and may be located immediately adjacent to utility easements. Mr. Herrick also contends that under the guidelines of the Standard Building Code, the .garage/patio should be considered as detached. Analysis• In answering Mr. Herrick's points of contention, the Standard Building Code will be considered first. Mr. Herrick is apparently referring to Section 412.4 of the code. This section which deals with private 'garages, specifies requirements for fire wall separation between attached garages and the remaining portions of a building. This section does not seek to distinguish between attached and.; detached garages and is in any case irrelevant as this appeal is to interpretation of zoning requirements and. not to Building Code ® provisions. r: Appeal A89-003 Page 2 i In considering interpretation of the zoning ordinance, it is useful to begin with the ordinance's definition of "accessory structure." This definition reads: A detached, subordinate structure, the use of which is clearly incidental. and related to that of the principal structure or use of the land, and is located in the same lots as ~that~of the principal structure or use. As the term detached is not defined by the zoning ordinance, Section 3-100 directs that it and other undefined terms be construed in accordance with "their customary usage and meaning." Within this context, the Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines detached as "standing by itself: SEPARATE, UNCONNECTED." The portion of Exhibit D highlighted in blue indicates the breezeway/patio of the Herrick's proposed house. As it is clear from this exhibit that the breezeway/patio roof is attached to the main portion of the .house', it can in no way be considered as detached if the "customary usage and meaning" of the word is used. • Conclusion• The Enforcing Officer was correct in determining the garage/patio to be attached and subject to primary structure setback reouirements. C n !t M !` !r ~ Z t 1 • a~~ X13 w' • ••i ••..~~•~~•;r. .. ~~ ,~,• ~i`ti = ~ti a 1~; ',~~Za =t>i•! ~ ~~ . .~ G r • ~ ;.~ ~ • ti • ; ~3! ! ~ - ~ / - ~ ` `Iii t .r• ~n~`+` •~ ~~ ~ ~ / ~/ i• ~ ~ ~!._ - •~ I t "'•• 4 ~t1~' ~ A .s .~ • i. n - ~ ar • • O ' . ~ ~ • ~ _ • _ I ~~ ~ o ~ j~. ~ ~.,rr:~ rii•• ~'~•ea,. -- •--~ ~ ~`_ ~~'- --mss -~ . • . \ + In `C1\`~~ '~ / It ~ ~ 'a G ~ ~ • ~ I er'r' I v ' .~ • • \ r ~ • • ~ 't '' ~. • ~ I m i1LVE^ I ~ • • ' \ ~ ' t'' ,'~ i ~ ~ I I 1 ~ •, r I ••t S / I i~ • • D n ~ ' ~ •^ .. • ~~~. ,''f .~,~. 0 7', :. M'C~ODLANO COURT 1 I iI ~. aQ ~ ( ~ ~ OOi !I ~.. ~ .. 1 % 1 ... v / ~ i• ~ ! I 1 1I ~. '•. t A e ~c a ~ -- _ 1 ~_ •. ~ x ~ ~ • i ~~ A • ti a _ _ ~ i f '~~ i i x~~ \ •• 1 i ®I ~ w ~ ~ ~ / y t I t• ~ ~ 1 ~ IY ~- ~ j A.: , RECEIVED BIJILDING/~PERMIT MAY 251989 ; O Jurisdiction of_ ~.GZ /-O~~e- rnn` ~Og~~M~ D Applicant to complete numbered spaces on/y. Y cos woDR css // // /~ ~ 7~ C/~ bl?,rr /~ VPa'J ~/C' ~CLf ~'rc % - Gaffe -,So c LOT NO SLR TRAL7 .. .. ILGAL 1 D[aCR. ~ (00[[ ATTALN[D aN[[TI 0T4N[R z Ii ~// ~ MAIL ADOR[ef "' IIP NONE ~ebs~v • S~~G -/ ~ ~ 9 ~ 6~/ 5/~3 ~/d t l~ •~ ~ a r~- i• i ~ On rtQ ~ri~ er e~ .: CONTRACTOR 3 //ll MAIL ADDR[Sf "" t 2 - PNONC / e ~ •REGISTRATIONNO. ~ di-YI U0~7i7 Gt I,A r / S~ . o wltcNlTCLT OR OCSIGNLR a MAIL ADDRESS ~ 7a G . iPi~-ey PNDNC ~ 30 3 573- 3 REGISTRATION NO. . [NGIN[LR - - MAIL AoDRCSS - PNDNL REGISTRATION NO. 5 -- LLNO[R -- ~ ~ MAIL ADDRCSS - •' - DRANCM " s ~~s f Ci~ ~l ~ ~ ~'>`o. ~//o( ,~i„~t dS ~ err ~'+~2 vsL or evILDINa .. ._.. .. 7 ,Sid /e ~u~ // rPLI~" c e. 8 Class of work: ~ NEW ^ ADDITION ^ ALTERATION G REPAIR D MOVE ~ REMOVE 9 Describe work: ~~ ~ J ~•~• 10 Valuation of work• S 8O D ~ ' ~ QO' PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Type o1 Occupancy C /,H'I.. f L• P-c.1 d Y r ~ 6 Const. Group Division d G G~ ~ { t L /1/ G ~ ~~ Si2e 01 Bldg. NO. 01 Max. / ~eM r~/ /~~ .C, (Total) Sq. Ft. Stories Occ. Losd 5'/ ~e Z Fire Use ~ Fire SDrinklers APPl1~AT NACCE PIED BV WEANS CwE KF APPq E FO ISS IANCE ~ Zone Zone ~ Required ~Ves ^NO ' ;~` _~."~ !• ' '• _ NO. O1 Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered NOTICE ' •• Special Approvals Required Received Not Required SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- zorvlNG ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CON• HEALTH DEPT. STRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN s - FIRE DEPT. MONTHS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR THS AT ANY TIME AFTER FO PER M SOIL REPORT R A ABANDONED IOD OF 6 ON WORK IS COMMENCED. ., OTHER (Spec)+y) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APP E TRUE AN RRECT T . LICATION AND KNOW THE SAME O B D CO ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS P ITH WHETHER SPECIFIED T P ' Y E OF Y. ORK WILL BE COM LIED W HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PR I ATE OR CANCEL THE T T T HORI O V ESUME TO GIVE AU Y OL PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTR R THE RF RMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION T . ION O UC E O ~ ~ A 31 r CON TR AC TO R AU NORI2 LD AL[N7 ~ IDAT I WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN THIS SPACE) THIS IS YOUR PERMIT PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH EXHIBIT' .~ A•1 • May 26, 1989 F••iOnE ~71:~ 171.5020 William ~ Donna Herrick X23 Elder Glen Webster, TX 77598 .A PO~'C. TE7. a,c 7 7~7 i RE: Building Fermit Appl. for Blk 10; Lot ~; Shady River, Sec. III Dear N,r. ~ Mrs. Herrick, I regret that the City of La Porte has had to disapprove your building permit application for a new home to be located in the Shady River Subdivision. This disapproval was based on failure to comply with the rear setback requirements specified by Sect. 5-700, Table B of City Zoning Ordinance 1501. This section specifies a rear setback of fifteen (15) feet for principal structures used as single family homes. All portions of a structure which are under a single roof are considered to be part of the same structure. Since the garage pictured on the submitted site plan is attached to the house by means of a breezeway, the garage is considered to be part of the principal structure and therefore subject to rear setback requirements. I am returning to you, the building permit application, one set of plans including survey end site plan, and a copy of Sect. 5-700, Table B. 3'he other set of plans which were submitted are being retained for the City~s records. Respectfully, ~`~ Ervin J. if i ' • Chief B i ' • g fi icial • City of La Porte EJG/mjs FORTE ~XHIB11' C • • • • RECE11/~0 Ste, ~ J~ . tt ~4 ~~t .,~ ~t 1 - • • ~' ~ ~~ r, . No Ov6 ~ • 1'^'r ~ o~ ~ 133.42' .. ~ . -~n u,~ ~ _.. 3~ N • ~ 4 '^ \ 9? 'yam, \~ ~ O ~ \ . O , In 3•R~aF ANC. ~ N O O~ ~ OR.ive - ~ _ •\ p" ~+a'a " 3o~-D 23- y '. ~~ • WALL - •~', ~~' /?~ .t ~ -- ~ ' cou c. ~ ' WAtK \~ \, ~ _ .... 1 • .. j-{•AG1~8E'R~'Y .AVENUE ~~O • Q \~~ ~r/ ~ .~! f~IY / ~' DoT ~ BLOCK. ICS - .- Lh ~nRTG, TEX.~.S•_ DLO T PL A 1.1 5G, I"=CIO'-O" (LGSIpEI.ICE ~~ IL.XH~B~ D ~ MR.. ~ Mi=6, p,;ILL }I~R2-CK I~~ ......_......... ---.........,:'~~^..'I ,~laADAi1NS I^MS-~-3246-16 ~ .:r ..~ w~wn~~A1C