Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-31-1991 Public Hearing and Special Meeting• • • M I N tJ T E S • • • Members Present: Members Absent• LA PORTE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JANUARY 31, 1991 City Staff Present: Others Present• Deborah Bernay, Jody Seeger, Willie Walker, Charles Christensen, Steve Hines All Present Joel H. Albrecht, Director of Community Development and John Armstrong, Assistant City Attorney John Andre representing Blue Flash, Tim DeWalt and Cameron Earl Shanks 1) - - .' CALL TO ORDER ' ~~- ~ The meeting was called to order by Chairman Deborah Bernay at 7:01 P.M. • 2) - APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 13, 1990, MEETING - =~ Motion was made for the minutes to be approved and was - ~. ~ -~, adopted unanimously. 3)~~~ - CONSIDER APPEAL TO THE ENFORCING OFFICER'S DECISION - ~ `.,~~~~.~~. _ - ~A91-001. APPLICANT. IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A - - '..ZONING PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A TANK TRUCK : ~~ _ CLEANING FACILITY IN A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE. PROPOSED - - 'FACILITY TO BE LOCATED AT 1802 SOUTH "M" STREET. - ~uJoel Albrecht presented the staff's report. He stated Blue Flash Express, Inc. is proposing to develop a truck washing and maintenance facility to be located at -~ 1802 South "M" Street which is located in a Light --~ Industrial Zone. It will consist of the cleaning of the interior of tank trucks. Since the adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 1501-L, tank truck cleaning has been designated as a Heavy Industrial Use. This Ordinance was adopted by City Council on September 29, 1990, and went into effect on October 8, 1990. Blue Flash Express, Inc. is appealing the denial of ~. ~ this permit based on the contention that the planning and design work undertaken prior to September 29, 1990, • established property use. • • Board of Adjustment January 31, 1991, Meeting Page 2 of 5 Dr. Bernay swore in Mr. John Andre who is representing Blue Flash Express, Inc. Mr. Andre told the Board he purchased the property for a tank wash operation. At the time of purchase, its use was allowed within light industrial zoning and changed after purchase through City Council adoption of revisions to the Zoning Ordinance. He further stated that the company would be cleaning only the trucks carrying medical and food • grade materials. No hazardous materials would be involved. Cleaning of the tanks would consist of a high pressure hose using cold water which then flows into a holding tank at which time it is recycled for •~;. future use. If any plastic residue is left, it too is - - recycled and sold to individual companies. Blue Flash . -~ ~~ Express, Inc. now has thirty five (35) employees with _--" •• expected growth to fifty (50) by the end of the year. 4) . • ~ ~' •=... ~~. CALL FOR VOTE TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE ENFORCING • - . , - =-.,OFFICER'S DECISION #A91-001. - j Motion was made by Steve Hines to approve the request -•,_by•Blue Flash Express, Inc., with the stipulation of • _~~~.~,~=-.~_`=~-:materials being used be non-hazardous. The motion was ~• •• • ~~•'.•'seconded by Jody Seeger. The vote was 5 ayes and 0 - :~F ~~ ~ ;'y - ~ -nays . ~`•=.:_ 5) •>-.~,`~ ~ :' . -:-.. CONSIDER APPEAL TO THE ENFORCING OFFICER' S DECISION "._ #A91-002. APPLICANT IS APPEALING THE .DENIAL OF A • `- ~:~:BUILDING PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,120 SQUARE _ ;, . r `}`rv-"_'~,` FOOT ACCESSORY BUILDING WHICH WOULD NOT MEET THE 30 •~ ~ -~~~ =-~-~-AFOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION ~'F-•= ~_ ~_- 10-300.5. PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ' AT 11618 • : '~ - NORTH "L" STREET. • :~~' ~ .. • • • • Board of Adjustment January 31, 1991, Meeting Page 3 of 5 Joel Albrecht presented the staff's report. On January 8, 1991, Mr. Tim DeWalt applied for a building permit for the purpose of constructing a 1,120 square foot accessory building to be located at his home which is located at 11618 North "L" Street. This permit was denied for failure to comply with the setback provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 10-200.5. The • appeal has been requested under the provision of Zoning Ordinance Section 11-604. The first paragraph of Section 10-200.5 limits the size of accessory buildings for single family dwellings. This section states accessory structures are not to exceed one thousand . (1,000) square feet of floor area. The second -,~, .paragraph of the section makes an exception to this size limit. The exception applies to large lot _ residential homesites of an acre or more in size, -allows accessory buildings of up to 2,000 square feet. • .: = It also requires that larger accessory buildings be set back at least thirty (30) feet from property lines and thirty (30) feet behind the rear line of the primary • ~structuze. Mr. DeWalt states that the placement of the •~ - ~ -~=proposed building is intended to maintain clearance. ~_' ... ;•'from a waterline and a pipeline corridor that crosses __ ~ ~+~.=,~ ~ his property. He is basing his appeal on his -.~:r:: ~-; .:: contention that the thirty ( 30 ) foot accessory setback "' =~:~~`,~. ~~`~''~L'requirement is unreasonable. _ ~ Dr. Bernay swore in Mr. Tim DeWalt. He stated he _~ ,':, - ~-~ .wished to build a 27' x 11" x40' storage building ~ on •• ~: ~~ ~~his property and to stay off the pipe line right-of- .: _•way and existing water lines and to seek relief from . _ ~~the thirty (30) foot set back. 6) -~. - CALL FOR VOTE TO APPROVE OR DENY THE ENFORCING OFFICER'S DECISION #A91-002. Motion was made by Charles Christensen to deny the appeal. The motion was seconded by Jody Seeger. The vote was 5 ayes and 0 nays. 7) CONSIDER SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST #SE91-001. APPLICANT IS SEEKING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH AND DETACHED GARAGE THAT WILL • NOT MEET ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SETBACKS IN SIDEYARDS WHICH ARE ADJACENT TO STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY. PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO BE LOCATED AT 302 SOUTH 3RD STREET. • • Board of Adjustment January 31, 1991 Meeting Page 4 of 5 Joel Albrecht presented the staff's report. He stated that at the time Mr. Shanks purchased his home located at 202 South 3rd Street, the home had been vacant for a number of years and was in a dilapidated condition. At that time there was a detached garage in the rear yard and a side porch located on the north side of the house. According to Mr. Shanks, the garage was set back five feet from the north property line. This " property line abuts the West "A" Street right-of-way. In order to complete foundation repairs to his house, he was forced to remove the side porch and at that time the dilapidated garage was demolished. While both the "~- ~ new garage and new porch would be larger than the originals, both would maintain the original setbacks. ."~ •- "-" Section 11-605.2.b.3 allows the Board of Adjustment to _ '-::~, consider "yard exception(s) on corner lots." This is - the exception requested. It is eligible to be ~.- - considered for the requested relief. • ~ Dr. Bernay swore in Mr. Shanks. He told the Board he _ wished to replace the garage that had been demolished _ _ _ because of its poor condition and also replace the - y;. ~ : ~:."~,~:` ': "porch that had to be removed in order to make repairs _ • - - -..- ' , to. the foundation of the house. Mr. Shanks did state" -: -, J "that while he will be replacing both structures and _ `~"~ `-`~xJ - - T ~ y~ that they will be larger than before, the original `~~~:~ - ~ `~ ~" "setbacks would be the same 8)_:~.. ;- CALL FOR VOTE TO APPROVE OR DENY SPECIAL EXCEPTION .~.= ~''`'` . REQUEST #SE91-001. - ~ _' • ^~}-~ Motion was made by Charles Christensen to approve the ". _~ '_:~~`'~,°~.' Special Exception Request #SE91-002. The motion was ". .~-_ _.-' seconded by Steve Hines. An amended motion was made by ~_~``- ~- Charles Christensen with the stipulation of no overhang " to exceed over the property line. The motion was seconded by Steve Hines. The vote was 5 Ayes and 0 Nays. • ' • • Board of Adjustment January 31, 1991 Meeting Page 5 of 5 • 9) BEFORE ADJOURNING THE MEETING, MR. ALBRECHT ADDRESSED THE BOARD STATING HE HAD RECEIVED A REQUES~° FROM A CITIZEN OF LA PORTE REQUESTING IN WRITING, THE RULES AND PROCEDURES OF HOW THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT IS CONDUCTED. HE REQUESTS THIS INFORMATION TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE NEXT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEET%NG. 10) • _' ADJOURNMENT There being no fugther business, the meeting was '__~ adjourned at 8:16 P.M. _ . : K4 _ _ :Bespectfully submitted, Cheryl .Stout, Secretary .•Code Enforcement --,.Minutes= approved on the - _ ti '~ _ - -. ... :,~.. ~. - - ~~i-. - ~i may,. j5~~; •-' •+. ~ ~ .... ;` _ ':-fe~F'Deborah Bernay, Chairman ~ ~• `~Board~~ of Adjustment 01-31-91 :iOji.t'r "i. _ -. f• c~ 4 ir.. ~_ `, day•of ' _ -.t ... - - ~l., .. • _ _ e ~ ~ ... ~.k • i ~ ~3 . ~ ~~ ~~ l~ ~ ® ~ ~~ .~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~~ ~ Q~ ~~ ~~ . ~~ 8-~i ~. 3PE~IAL EXCEPTrC7N~"'REQUEST ~~~ SL~'91.-002 CITY OF LA PORTE • 1 ZONING AOARD OF ADJUSTr1ENT SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST -•----- ---------- APPlicati.on No.:f~`1/__ 6~ USE ONLY: Fee_ ~~ NlA Date Received: ~~1. OFFICE _._._ __-• -- -~-•~ f ~r• ec"~' ._.__._._._._. Receipt No.. ~~_ ~~ NOTE: This Fee is Non-Refundable. Regardless of the Board's Decis on. --------------------------------------------- A p p l i c a n t. City of La Porte -•-.--r-.--.-•----_-- _-.. 604 W. Fairmonta~arkWay P H: 471-5020 _ ~_____~.___-._--~-• Address I am the owner of the herein described property. I have authorized w,i~_T,-~oyu~~~`___._•_J_____,_, to act on my behalf in this matter. Owner: ~i#~ts~f._I.~_.Pox~ _______._._____----•._._- . • Name ---•-•-_~Q4. V~T.~. Fai mm~~3r]SSerc3X._----~-~-~-•-•-•-•------• P H : x.71 _5.020 Address I am requesting a Special Exception to Sect. ~7oo;R/1~ of the City Zoning Ordinance No. 1501. I am requesting this Special Exception for property located at 1322 S. B~?.y____ - •• Address Legal Description Lots 6 thru_28 . Block 1158 _ __ •__--..._-_._._-__ --• • (x)~Site Plan ( ) Minor Development Site Plan .- ( ) Major Development Site Plan ( ) General Plan A'Site Plan of the property is attached. Also, I have listed the:.. information requested below on the following pages of this form.•`. ~~a) All facts concerning the matter that has led up to this request. ~.~:~b)`. The type of relief I am seeking (setbacks, .lot coverage, etc.). " ~' c) ~ The grounds upon which I am making this request. - . ~ If applicant is NOT the owner, he Ln{~.~t provide Authorization to act on the Owner's behalf. ~ ~- .~:. _3/21/91 ~ ~ ~ -=- - Date ~ Applicant's Signature ------------------------------------------ OFFICE USE ONLY Site Plan and Authorization (if applicable) attached? Yes (V) No ( ) Date transmitted to the Board of Adjustments: __-___- - Meeting Date: ~ ~ 3.9.1 _ ~ ApPlicant Notified of Date: _. y~~__._.__.__ Board's Decision: Approved ( ) Denied ( ) Notice of Board Decision mailed to Applicant/Owner: _._-_.___.__-_._- • PAGE 2 A Special Exception is a deviation from the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Before they grant a special exception, The Board of Adjustments must determine that the exception is not contrary to the best public interest and will not adversely affect the value or use of adjoining property. Special exceptions may be-granted for the following items only: (1~) The reconstruction of .or addition to a building occupied by a non-conforming use. Additions cannot extend past the lot occupied by the original structure or use. The reconstruction or use cannot prevent the property from returning to a conforming use. . (2) Deviation of yard requirements under the following cir- cumstances: . • ., ~ (a) . ~.: ' (b) Exceptions to front yard requirements if front yard setbacks are not met on abutting pieces of property. Exception to rear yard setbacks if any four (4) lots .within a block do not meet setback requirements. Exceptions to yard requirements on corner. lots. ~•. (d) Exceptions to front yard requirements if existing . ~ ~ ~. .. front yard setbacks on .a block are not uniform. . . -' .(3).:Waiving or reduction of off street parking and loading :~~~~~;~=~~; ~'. ~~_: requirements if the Board feels they are unnecessary y V ~ ~ i '.s:~{::_ ~~, ~ for the proposed use. of a building or piece of property. ~. ~ ~ ~-' Please remember ~ it is the Applicant's responsiblity to prove ' ttiat_a Special Exception will meet the above conditions. ' ..•.~~If theme is not adequate room on the remainder of this form to list.all pertinent information, please feel free to attach an additional letter .or any information and exhibits .you feel the Board should consider. FACTS RELEVANT TO THIS MATTER: F~cistinq building to be modified and ~xi~~fs~ ~x~nvir~ fnr_ a..Senior_ ~; +; ~An and Wellness Facility. • - , •. PAGE 3 i TYPE OF RELIEF BEING SOUGHT: Building setback reguir~rnnt on the South T~t:~ts~ G~ e- .__.___.__ _ See attached report. -___ -----•- --•------ .-- THE• GROUNDS FOR THE REQUEST: ~ . ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' . _'~:{~ See attached report: ~. -------------------- '~~ .. - .. ._ ._ .. ... ,a-, _. CED/1-'87 • • Requested for: Legal Description: Requested By: Zoning: Requested Relief: CJ SPECIAL EXCEPTION REpUEST SE91-002 1322 South Broadway (See Exhibit A) Lts 6-28; Blk 1158; Town of La Porte City of La Porte, owner General Commercial Special exception .to: A.- The setback requirements of Zoning . Ordinance 1501, Section 5-700, Table B as provided for by the provisions of Section i1-605.1.b.1; specifically, a reduction of setback adjacent to the undeveloped First Street right-of-way to one (1) foot. B. The parking requirements of Zoning Ordinance 1501, Section 10-609, as provided for by Section 11-605.2.c; specifically a reduction in the number of on-site parking spaces. ~~~.Backaround and Analysis: ~~9~G~~a~ ` ~~ The City of Ga Porte has acquired th old La Porte Bowling -~.~ Alley (located at 1322 South Broadway) nd is preparing to renovate the structure for use as the City's Wellness Center." :When completed, the facilities housed in this building will ''include the' administrative offices for the City's Parks and .Recreation department, the Senior Citizen's Center and what will • 'in effect function as a municipal health club (See Exhibi~)~,~~,~ •~ :the facilities included in the building are a basketball court and lap pool which will be housed in an •approximately 13,140 square foot building addition. ~, the'addition will have a setback of approximately one foot from the adjacent First Street right-of-way. (See Exhibit A). ~~ the alley in block 1158 n closed' the lots within • this block are deemed to be through lots. Section 3-100 of the . Zoning Ordinance defines through lots as follows: "A 'through lot' is a building lot, not a corner lot, both the front and rear lot lines of which adjoin street lines. On a 'through lot' both street lines shall be deemed front lot lines." Under the terms of this-definition, both the First Street and Broadway faces of the City's property are subiect to front setback requirements. ' ~ • • Page 2 of 6 Section 5-700, Table B residential establishes setback requirements for ~ Recreational Buildings. As setbacks are, in this instance established by use instead of by zone, these setbacks are applicable even though this particular facility is located on property zoned for General Commercial use. The front setback established for this type of building is thirty feet. The first exception being requested by the City is to this setback requirement. •The second exception being requested by the City, is to the' parking requirements. Under the provisions of Section 10-609, a total of 113 on-site parking spaces are required for this facility See Exhibit C). The City is requesting a reduction to 90 spaces. - Section 11-605.2 both defines special exception and sets criteria for approval of a request. This section states: The term "special exception" shall mean a deviation from the requirements of the Zoning . Ordinance, specifically enumerated herein, which shall be granted only in the following instances, and then only when the Board finds that such special exception will not • adversely affect the value and use of adjacent or neighboring property or be contrary to the best public interest. Section 11-605.2.b.1 allows a special exception to front setback requirements in the following circumstances: Any exception from the front yard • requirements where the actual front yard setback of any abutting lot does not meet the front yard ~~ requirement. .~-~ M~~p ~ The existing building which occupies Lts 8-13 and 20-25, has a setback adjacent to First Street of approximately 17 feet. This is 13 feet less than the required 30 feet. Additionally, there is~ a--vita which projects from the rear of the building. Agh this 12 ft. x 27 ft. section of the building is schedule for demolition it currently extends to within 4 ft. of the Fi st Street proper line. The building addition to be constr ted on the abuttin lots (14-19) is therefore eligible to • be con idered for the reque ted special exception. ® • • Page 3 o f 6 Section 11-605.2.C allows the following Special Exception to on-site parking requirements: To waive or reduce off-street parking and loading requirements when the Board finds the same are unnecessary for the proposed use of the building or structure for which the special exception .request applies. ~~a,oraL~,•~t~N &sd, the7.Wellness Center will be a multi-use facility. The•Cfty feels that since the different uses taking place within the building will have different "peak activity" hours, the reduced number of spaces being requested will provide adequate parking. Additionally, approximately 30$ of the senior citizens who make use of the Senior Center do not drive and rather make use of City provided bus service. This should further reduce parking demand. The proposed 90 space parking lot will provide an efficient traffic circulation pattern on the site. The extra "elbow" room created by deleting 23 spaces will allow for a more comfortable • degree of maneuvering room for drivers. This will result in a safer parking lot. rl,~ ~ ~~,~ ~~N,g~ ~b~~ . ~' "~ ' Since the eligibility for the requested exception has been established, the next issue to be considered is possible impact on the use of neighboring property. As noted, the First Street .right-of-way abuts the "face" of the tract for which a special '`exception has been requested. At present this portion of First "= Street is undeveloped except for a small section of unpaved base • material that has been used for access to the rear of the • existing building. Although there are presently no plans for ~,~~4~developing this poztion of First Street, the proposed addition ~~ would not preclude future street impr vement. The setback ,1 exception, if granted, should not impac surrounding property. (l As all parking for the5llWellness Center will be contained on- V site, there should be no impact as a re ult of a reduction of parking spaces either. The final issue to be considered in is whethez or not granting this request w~ best public interest." While the Boa; determination regarding the best public several factors which indicate that t facility will be compatible with and a b ; community. Among these are the followin • egards to this request uld be "contrary to the d must make the final interest," there are he development of this nefit to the surrounding • • Page 4 of 6 From the City's Comprehensive Plan, Volume i (Section 1.5): - The need to provide adequate recreational space and facilities in any community is generally a public priority...The Open Space and Pedestrian System component of the Master Plan is dedicated to defining...necessary open space facilities and support systems... • Major components of the Open Space and Pedestrian systems are - a pedestrian circulation system that will facilitate easy and safe access to neighborhood and community parks and link La Porte's recreational system with the ;•~ region-wide system. • ~ - the necessary number of recreational and sport facilities compatible with local recreational interest -V fn order to: . ~ ~ encourage local attendance. ,. ~~ - maximize access and service. minimize delays and inconvenience. • feet) of the 20,000-square-foot facility is proposed in •• •the 5-year capital improvement program. This facility will house the social programs that the City sponsors both currently and in the future. The proposed development of this facility results from two ~•concurrent situations: •~ ~ ~~[Comprehensive Plan) Exhibit 13 depicts the Open Space ~.~ ~ ~~and Pedestrian System Plan (See Exhibit D). ' ~. •~. Also.''proposed by the Comprehensive Plan is a "Social -Services 'Center". The Center is discussed in Volume I of the ~' Comprehensive Plan (Section 1.6): ~~ ~ = Social Services Center - The first phase (12,000 square • ® • C: Page 5 of 6 An important portion of the space utilized by the social programs sponsored by the City is located in the Police Department facilities, approximately 6,000 square feet of space. There is an existing need to expand these facilities but there is no available space. The Police Department intends in the short term to expand its facilities by either building new facilities or expanding into the space occupied by public agencies and programs (approximately 12,000 square feet). • LJ After discussions with the City staff and the Comprehensive~Plan Steering Committee it was considered _ more appropriate to allow the Police Department to expand within its existing facility and develop the Social Services Center. The Wellness Facility will house the City's '~"Senior Citizen Center." This is one of the social service facilities. currently located in the Police Administration building. Relocating the Senior Center to the Wellness Center wily: facilitate the needed Police Department expansion. Additionally, the relocation of the Parks and Recreation Office to the .Wellness Center will help alleviate a similar crowding problem~at the Public Works Service Center. These moves will act .to satisfy stated goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Development of the recreation facilities, (swimming pool, weight rooms, etc.) also satisfies a specific Comprehensive Plan goal, namely the construction of a "4,000 square foot gym with support pavilion" to be developed in conjunction with the Little Cedar Bayou Park. Exhibit D, indicates the relatively close proximity of the Wellness Facility site to Little Cedar Bayou Park and more specifically, to the established pedestrian trail that links the Park and Galveston Bay. The proposed facility will fit in well with Little Cedar Bayou Park, The Bay Forest Golf Course and pedestrian trails that are located in what is becoming the "recreational center" of La Porte. Finally, by adaptive reuse and expansion of an existing facility, the above listed goals are being accomplished in an efficient and economically prudent manner. • • Page 6 of 6 Conclusion: The Wellness Center meets ordinance prerequisites and is therefore eligible for the requested Special Exception. Granting the requested Special Exception should have no adverse impact on neighboring property. By satisfying goals of the Comprehensive Plan, development of this facility should serve the public interest. • Finally, should any party wish to appeal the Zoning Board of Adjustment's decision regarding this matter, Section 11-610 states: • .. ~ ;;~ , Any person or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Adjustment, or any taxpayer, or any officer, department, board, or bureau of the Cfty of La Porte may present to a court of record a petition for a writ of certiorari, as provided by Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated, Local Government Code, Section 211.011, duly verified, setting forth that such decision is illegal, in whole or in part, specifying the grounds of the illegality. Such petition shall be presented to the court within ten (10)~days after the filing of the decision in the office of the Board of Adjustment. 1 ~\ ~~, ~~ ' ~ • • • - - .. << ! - - ~i K =i ,~ r .. _ ~.r ~~ c~ orrer _~ \e ~ ~~ ~ _____________.: I c I i v\ ~ .~• ~ ~ ~, - ~ /-! i ~ ~~ ' C~ S s~ i i ~ ~ i 1 ~ r ~~~ ~~~;J exHisrr A • • • .._.~;. .. _ (';`- frry Z' .' ~ ' ~U' Z Z. goy, °~o VO. fi .~ ,r j -r- _ ~ ... i •-' . ,~ ~..~ F ~• • , ~ 7. - ~ ;' _.. ~ . ~ ~ !~ ~- .~~. _ ~. ~.. ~. A F~ ~ '~ ~ ~ 1 1 ` ~V 1 R~:l~ IlRl~i~°~RRl ~I~a~ R~ ~~6l~0E~ ~ ~E1 ~ ~11RliitR~ liR~~t~R~~ I { i l i?i::::i::i:i •:,++:=~i:9di3i2:i: is :::::iiaii::i:i:idi:iii c~ 6 ', r R J ~. .~ ;. ~ ~ ~ .R l ~ ~~ C~ ~ ~~ o uJ R 7 I ~ 4 ~ ~ S '~~ __ ~ ri- ~ P ~-- 1~. v ~ R . -• N .--~r. ~p ['.~ ~.I~~ a ': ~ I:.i s O r~ o ~ L. r~ ~ ~ o r.~ ~ ~ 9 ~~ ~ ~ R °~ ~ 9 ~ ... -..: 1•.: it ~, tip=, ~.. . s _ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ - ©cHiBt~ B -'ti r J''~ • • ~r~ MELLNESS CENTER PARKING FEBRUARY 28, 1991 (including surrounding room)* TOTAL REC. AREA: 19,329 square feet Total Building Square Feet: 35,185 square feet ~~ ~ ~ Parks & Recreation Adm: 2,356 square feet ~`~ '' S. ~. Center: 19,800 square feet S~rimming Pool: ~ 3,700 square feet AREA USE PARKING ~ CALCULATION METHOD Rec.. Area ~ ~ '61 spaces' 1/200 sq. ft. after 2,000 sq. ft. deduct-• . Office Area - ~ ~ 8 spaces 1//300 sq. ft. ~- ~~ Senior Citizen Center ~~44 spaces ~ 3/100~q. ft. . !- ~~~- Base Parking 10 spaces TOTAL : ~ ~1• ~ 123 spaces Less 8$ deduct for:. ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ ' landscape • islands ~ . ~ • _ "~ 113 spaces •*SWIMMING POOL NOT. FACTORED INTO PARKING CALCULATIONS. ~~~.9~c . ~ ..;~ • DCHIBIT C ~.... ,.~ :.~:G~ v I I~ I. _ wwcra an OPEN SPACE AND PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM PLAN .i .......~~.;e I •/ I ~ ~ i ~ ~'s' i ~ .._ I 1 E } ~ ! l: ~ERNON G. HE ~, f ~- ~ ,` 'fir .\ ~---___ ~ _ ~~•:` } ±' ,~ ILA .~ . .~~ •~._ ~~ 1 i ~ `~ • 1 •`• `~ ` ~~ `~~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ' T u , ', 1 ~ ~~~ ~ :~ `,~ '`, ., '. a.paouns cus ~°. ~', ~ _ -1 .., a + .- ~+ '?,'w'c",c~':?K2N'si NEIGHBORHOOD PARK COMMUNITY PARK REGIONAL PARK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~• TRAIL8 ' 1111111111111111 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYB PEDESTRIAN O TYPE l O TYPE 2 O TYPE 7 VE NRY & PLAN ASSOCIATES F~CHIB~T D EXHIBIT 0 1600 7000 13 NORTH SCALE IN FEET ~ • ® B O A R D C~ F A L7 J U S T M E N T D E G E M B E R Z 3, Z 9 9 O i 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTB2ENTS MEMBERS ~• POSITION 1: Dr. Deborah Bernay Home: 471-7707 10453 Rustic Gate Work: 471-6546 La Porte, Tx 77571 .POSITION 2:. ~ Steve Hines Home: .476-5078 3102 Ashton Work: 923-2161 La .Porte, Tx 77571 POSITION..3; Jody Seeger Home: 470-2802 10916 Idlewood La Porte, Tx 77571 .POSITION 4: Willie Walker Home: 471-1365 327 North 6th Work: La Porte, Tx 77571 •~''•• • ~~, POSITION 5: Charles Christensen Home: 471-0460 320 South 7th Work: La Porte., Tx 77571 ~-QL~ y~c.~vcc~,~ U I ~~ .. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~~ r ~,c •