HomeMy WebLinkAboutGHOST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVALS PROJECT
Final
February 2014
Release Determination Report
City of La Porte
“Ghost” Underground Storage Tank Removals
120 South 2nd Street
La Porte, Harris County, Texas
Effective Environmental
Purchase Order Number: 99575
Tetra Tech Project No. 112C06196
Prepared for:
Effective Environmental
Prepared by:
6545s3
RELEASE DETERMINATION REPORT FORM
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 1 of 8
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
PETROLEUM STORAGE TANK PROGRAM
RELEASE DETERMINATION REPORT FORM
FORM INSTRUCTIONS: Use this form to report 1) the results from the investigation of a suspected or confirmed release, or 2) to report the
results of the permanent removal from service of a UST, or 3) the results of the routine removal of an AST from service, and/or 4) any routine
environmental site assessment (ESA) at PST sites where a ‘no further action’ letter from TCEQ is desired (routine AST removals and routine
ESAs are not specifically regulated by TCEQ). Refer to Investigating and Reporting Releases from Petroleum Storage Tanks (RG-411) for
more information. Note, the initial report of a suspected or confirmed release must be made within 24 hours of discovery using the form, PST
Program Incident Report (IR) form (TCEQ-20097). Submit completed forms to PST-RPR, TCEQ, MC 137, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas
78711-3087. DO NOT MODIFY THIS FORM IN ANY WAY. Complete all applicable blanks. Incomplete forms, including forms
missing relevant attachments, will be returned without review.
RDR FORM CHECKLIST
PLEASE NOTE: The following documents are required to be attached to this form upon submittal. Complete the checklist
and attach each listed document to the back of the form, or provide a written statement explaining why a particular item on
the checklist is not applicable/not available:
Copy of original Construction Notification form filed with the TCEQ regional office for the field construction activity.
Scaled site diagram(s) showing location & layout of tank system(s) including pipe chases, dispensers, and any remote fill ports; all
sampling points, North arrow, scale, nearest intersection of main roads. Previously removed tank systems should also be indicated.
Written description of tank removal activities, including removal of substances from tanks, tank cleaning/purging/inerting
activities, and tank condition (corrosion holes, tears, rust, etc.). Include description of piping and dispenser equipment condition.
Written description of site sampling activities, including sample equipment used, decontamination procedures, sample collection
and handling methods, sampling locations and summary of overall sampling rationale.
Copies of signed laboratory reports, complete chain-of-custody and laboratory check-in sheet documentation including sample
receipt temperature, sample preservation methods, date and time of sample collection, laboratory QA/QC etc.
Waste disposal, treatment, recycling or reuse documentation, including waste manifests signed and dated by all relevant parties.
Manifests should have all required signatures and dates, and show waste type, quantities and units.
Photographs (originals or high resolution color copies) of the site showing all parts of tank system (tanks, dispensers, piping, etc.),
all excavated areas including excavation bottoms, stockpiles, etc.
Tank destruction documentation (no. of tanks, size(s), former contents, tank composition [e.g., steel, fiberglass, etc.]) including
date of disposal and facility name, address and contact information.
Copy of amended UST or AST Registration and Self-Certification form (TCEQ-00724 or TCEQ-00659, respectively)as applicable.
Originals should be sent to the PST Registration Team (MC-138), TCEQ, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087.
Boring logs and well completion diagrams/well reports, as applicable. Logs should include field screening.
RCAS/CAPM and/or LOSS signatures are required on page 7 of this form.
A statement certifying that at the time the data in this report were generated, the laboratory was NELAC-accredited through the
Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for the environmental matrices, analytical methods, and parameters analyze or cite the
exception allowed under 30 Texas Administrative Code §25.6.
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 2 of 8
SUMMARY
Based on the information obtained during this release determination and by comparing the nondetected results and the detected results
to the method quantitation limits (MQLs) and the PST Program action levels, check all that apply:
No detected or nondetected results for a contaminant exceeded the respective MQL or background.
The detected or nondetected results for one or more contaminants exceeded the respective MQLs/background, but did not exceed
the PST Program action levels.
The detected or nondetected results for one or more contaminant exceeded the PST Program action levels.
Tank pit water was present. If present, was water sampled? Yes No
A groundwater sample representative of the first water-bearing zone was collected and analyzed (i.e., monitoring well installed).
A representative groundwater sample was collected and analyzed and one or more contaminants exceeded action levels.
This site is a new LPST site.
This site is an existing LPST case, there is no new release, and this Release Determination Report is being submitted as the tank
removal-from-service documentation. (NOTE: This site is a former LPST site).
The laboratory was NELAC-accredited through the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for the data in this report at the time
the data were generated. If not, then cite the applicable 30 TAC §25.6 rule exception(s) that apply to the data.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Is the responsible party financially able to complete the next appropriate step? YES or NO If no, and an LPST number is
assigned to this case, you may contact the PST-RPR Section at 512/239-2200 to request information on the State-Lead option. Pursuit
of this option requires submittal of detailed financial information including recent tax returns and other IRS documentation. Please
note that pursuit of this option is only possible once an LPST number has been assigned.
Answer the following question for all LPST cases subject to 30 TAC 334. Is this case eligible for reimbursement of necessary
corrective actions? YES or NO If not, appropriate corrective action in accordance with applicable rules and guidance may
continue without specific direction or approval from the PST-RPR Section, however, coordination with PST-RPR is recommended. If
the site is eligible for reimbursement, all corrective action activities, with the exception of initial NAPL recovery and emergency
abatement activities must be preapproved prior to initiation.
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 3 of 8
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Pre-existing LPST ID No.? NO or YES (LPST no[s].) TCEQ Region:12-Houston
Facility ID No.: Unknown Required unless one of the following applies:
Check here if tank registration is not required for this site (per 30 TAC §334.7), and check one of the following as applicable:
The tank(s) are partially excluded or exempted from jurisdiction under 30 TAC Chapter 334. Specify type or usage of
tank(s):
The tank(s) were permanently removed from the ground before May 8, 1986 (provide date of removal );
The tank(s) remained in the ground but were emptied, cleaned, and filled with inert substance before January 1, 1974
(provide date of activities: );
The tank(s) were out of operation, their existence was unknown (i.e., “ghost tank”), and they were permanently removed
from service within 60 days of their discovery (provide date of discovery: 11/12/2013 and describe method of
discovery: Grading area for new parking lot and hit USTs with soil mixer. )
Tank Owner: City of La Porte
Tank Owner Mailing Address: 604 W. Fairmont Parkway
Tank Owner City: La Porte State: TX Zip:77571
Tank Owner Contact Person: Reagan McPhail Phone: 281/470-5065 Fax no.:281/470-5005
Tank Operator (if different from tank owner): N/A
Tank Operator Mailing Address: N/A
Tank Operator City: N/A State: N/A Zip: N/A
Tank Operator Contact Person: N/A Phone: N/A Fax no.: N/A
Land Owner (if different from tank owner and operator): N/A
Land Owner Mailing Address: N/A
Land Owner City: N/A State: N/A Zip: N/A
Land Owner Contact Person: N/A Phone: N/A Fax no.: N/A
If site is a pre-existing LPST site with no new release or is a new LPST site, which of these parties will oversee the corrective
actions at this site? Tank Owner Tank Operator Land Owner Other (not the contractor or consultant):
Name: N/A
Address: N/A
City: N/A State: N/A Zip: N/A Contact person: N/A
Phone: N/A Fax: N/A
Please note that no matter which party conducts corrective action, the tank owner and the tank operator are jointly responsible for the
necessary corrective actions.
Facility Name: City of La Porte “Ghost Tanks”
Facility Physical Address: 120 South 2nd Street
Facility City: La Porte County: Harris County Code (see p. 8): 101
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 4 of 8
A. GENERAL INFORMATION (continued)
Indicate ALL tanks currently and formerly located at this site (attach pages as necessary):
Type (UST/AST) Product Type Size (approx. gal)
Current:
Date Removed from Service
Former: UST # 1 Unknown 1,000 11/15/2013
UST # 2 Unknown 1,000 11/15/2013
B. SUSPECTED RELEASE INFORMATION
Complete only this section and sections E through G as appropriate when a release is suspected to have occurred and it
was documented that a release had not occurred.
Date suspected release discovered: 11/20/2013 Reason release suspected: Soil Sample Analytical Data
Date suspected release reported to TCEQ: N/A Reported to:N/A
Possible source(s) of release: (check all that apply) Tanks: USTs ASTs Piping Overfills/spills Unknown
Other:
Type of substance(s) suspected released (check all that apply): Gasoline Diesel Used Oil Aviation Gasoline
Jet Fuel (type: ) Alcohol-blended fuel (Type and percentage of alcohol: )
Other: (be specific) N/A
Were UST/AST system tank and/or line tightness tests performed? YES or NO If yes, attach test data and results.
Did the tests indicate that all tanks and piping were tight? YES or NO If No, specify the portion of the tank system(s) that
were found not to be tight: N/A
Were any repairs conducted on the tank system(s)? YES or NO If yes, describe type(s) and location of repairs:
Were tightness tests performed after repairs were conducted? YES or NO If yes, attach test data and results.
Did the tests indicate that the repaired items were tight? YES or NO If No, specify the portion of the tank system(s) that were
found not to be tight: N/A
Were any soil confirmation samples collected? YES or NO If yes, were all potential source areas investigated?
YES or NO If samples were collected, attach descriptions of sample locations, collection methods, and laboratory results.
Were any groundwater confirmation samples collected? YES or NO If yes, were all potential source areas investigated?
YES or NO If samples were collected, attach descriptions of sample locations, collection methods, aquifer name, and
laboratory results. (Groundwater sampling is not required at this point unless there is reason to suspect impact.)
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 5 of 8
C. CONFIRMED RELEASE INFORMATION
Complete this section only if a release was confirmed; i.e., contaminant levels exceeded MQLs
Date release confirmed: 11/20/2013 Date release reported to TCEQ: N/A
Reported to:
Is this the first release from a UST or AST discovered at this site? YES or NO
Are there any other contamination or potential impacts to human health from any source other than the tank systems at this site?
YES or NO If yes, indicate type and location of contamination:
Reported to TCEQ by: N/A Representing: N/A
Method of release discovery:
Samples collected during tank removal-from-service activities Impact to utility line
Samples collected during other tank system construction activities Impact to surface water
Samples collected during release determination investigation Impact to water well
Other:
Method of release confirmation: (check all that apply)
Soil samples Groundwater samples Surface water samples Documentation of presence of NAPL
Source(s) of release (check all that apply): USTs ASTs Piping Dispenser Submersible Turbine Pump Area
Overfills/spills Unknown Other:
Substance(s) released (check all that apply): Gasoline Diesel Used Oil Aviation Gasoline
Alcohol-blended fuel (Type and percentage of alcohol:N/A )
Jet Fuel (type: N/A ) Other: (be specific)
Amount of product released: Unknown Chemical Abstract Service registry #: N/A (for hazardous substances)
Were any soil samples collected? YES or NO (check one) If yes, attach descriptions of sample locations, collection methods
and laboratory results.
Type of native soil: (check one) Clay or silt Sand, gravel or rock
Were any groundwater confirmation samples collected? YES or NO (check one) If yes, attach descriptions of sample
locations, collection methods, aquifer name, and laboratory results.
Known Impact(s): (check all that apply) Soil GW Surface Water Subsurface Utilities - type:
Buildings Water wells Other sensitive receptors: .
Was the land owner (if different from the tank owner) notified of the contamination? YES or NO (check one) If Yes, attach
copy of the letter which provided the notification. If No, documentation that notification was provided must be submitted within 30
days from the date the impact is discovered. N/A
Possibly Threatened: (check all that apply) GW Surface Water Subsurface Utilities - type:N/A
Buildings Water wells Other sensitive receptors:None
Was NAPL detected (greater than 0.01 feet)? YES or NO (check one) If yes, describe how and where it was detected, the
thickness detected, and the recovery actions taken: N/A
TCEQ-00621 (revised 08/28/2009) - previous versions obsolete Page 6 of 8
D. ABATEMENT MEASURES
Were abatement measures initiated to stop the release or to recover the released substance? YES or NO (check one) If yes,
describe the abatement and/or recovery measures taken and the dates and duration of the activities: Impacted soil was
excavated and disposed of on December 4, 2013.
Were UST/AST system tank and/or line tightness tests performed? YES or ■ NO (check one) If yes, attach test results.
Did the tests indicate that all tanks and piping were tight? YES or NO If No, specify the portion(s) of the tank system(s) that
were found not to be tight: N/A
Were any repairs conducted on the tank system(s)? YES or ■ NO (check one) If yes, describe type(s) and location of repairs:
N/A
Were tightness tests performed after repairs were conducted? YES or NO (check one) If yes, attach test results.
Did the tests indicate that the repaired items were tight? YES or NO If No, specify the portion of the tank system(s) that
were found not to be tight: N/A
E. FIRE/TCEQ/OTHER OFFICIALS NOTIFIED
Were any other officials notified? YES NO (check one) If Yes, indicate:
Name Representing Phone number Date(s) Notified
Monnie Deunger TCEQ-Austin 512-239-2154 11/13/2013
PST/UST Officer TCEQ-Region 12 713-767-3500 11/13/2013
V. Schoppatt La Porte Fire Marshal 281-867-4603 11/14/2013
Were any directives issued by the fire or other officials? YES or NO If Yes, describe directives and actions taken in response
to the directive: Fire Marshall requested to inspect tanks prior to removal from tankhold.
F. WASTE DISPOSITION
Indicate the status of all wastes and other materials generated:
Type of waste (soil, water, product) Quantity and Units Method and location of disposal or treatment
Wash Water/Residual Product 4,400 Gallons Recycle – Effective Environmental’s Recycling Facility,
Pasadena, Texas
Sludge (Tank Contents) 30 Cubic Yards Recycle – HPP Materials, Baytown, Texas
Impacted Soil 100 Cubic Yards Recycle – HPP Materials, Baytown, Texas
Steel Tanks 2 X 1,000 Gallon Recycle – Texas Port Recycling, Houston, Texas
TC
E
Q
-
0
0
6
2
1
(
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
0
8
/
2
8
/
2
0
0
9
)
-
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
s
o
b
s
o
l
e
t
e
Pa
g
e
8
o
f
8
CO
U
N
T
Y
C
O
D
E
L
I
S
T
1
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
3
8
C
h
i
l
d
r
e
s
s
7
5
F
a
y
e
t
t
e
1
1
2
H
o
p
k
i
n
s
1
4
9
L
i
v
e
O
a
k
1
8
6
P
e
c
o
s
2
2
3
T
e
r
r
y
2
A
n
d
r
e
w
s
3
9
C
l
a
y
7
6
F
i
s
h
e
r
1
1
3
H
o
u
s
t
o
n
1
5
0
L
a
m
b
1
8
7
P
o
l
k
2
2
4
T
h
r
o
c
k
m
o
r
t
o
n
3
A
n
g
e
l
i
n
a
4
0
C
o
c
h
r
a
n
7
7
F
l
o
y
d
1
1
4
H
o
w
a
r
d
1
5
1
L
o
v
i
n
g
1
8
8
P
o
t
t
e
r
2
2
5
T
i
t
u
s
4
A
r
a
n
s
a
s
4
1
C
o
k
e
7
8
F
o
a
r
d
1
1
5
H
u
d
s
p
e
t
h
1
5
2
L
u
b
b
o
c
k
1
8
9
P
r
e
s
i
d
i
o
2
2
6
T
o
m
G
r
e
e
n
5
A
r
c
h
e
r
4
2
C
o
l
e
m
a
n
7
9
F
o
r
t
B
e
n
d
1
1
6
H
u
n
t
1
5
3
L
y
n
n
1
9
0
R
a
i
n
s
2
2
7
T
r
a
v
i
s
6
A
r
m
s
t
r
o
n
g
4
3
C
o
l
l
i
n
8
0
F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n
1
1
7
H
u
t
c
h
i
n
s
o
n
1
5
4
M
c
C
u
l
l
o
c
h
1
9
1
R
a
n
d
a
l
l
2
2
8
T
r
i
n
i
t
y
7
A
t
a
s
c
o
s
a
4
4
C
o
l
l
i
n
g
s
w
o
r
t
h
8
1
F
r
e
e
s
t
o
n
e
1
1
8
I
r
i
o
n
1
5
5
M
c
L
e
n
n
a
n
1
9
2
R
e
a
g
a
n
2
2
9
T
y
l
e
r
8
A
u
s
t
i
n
4
5
C
o
l
o
r
a
d
o
8
2
F
r
i
o
1
1
9
J
a
c
k
1
5
6
M
c
M
u
l
l
e
n
1
9
3
R
e
a
l
2
3
0
U
p
s
h
u
r
9
B
a
i
l
e
y
4
6
C
o
m
a
l
8
3
G
a
i
n
e
s
1
2
0
J
a
c
k
s
o
n
1
5
7
M
a
d
i
s
o
n
1
9
4
R
e
d
R
i
v
e
r
2
3
1
U
p
t
o
n
10
B
a
n
d
e
r
a
4
7
C
o
m
a
n
c
h
e
8
4
G
a
l
v
e
s
t
o
n
1
2
1
J
a
s
p
e
r
1
5
8
M
a
r
i
o
n
1
9
5
R
e
e
v
e
s
2
3
2
U
v
a
l
d
e
11
B
a
s
t
r
o
p
4
8
C
o
n
c
h
o
8
5
G
a
r
z
a
1
2
2
J
e
f
f
D
a
v
i
s
1
5
9
M
a
r
t
i
n
1
9
6
R
e
f
u
g
i
o
2
3
3
V
a
l
V
e
r
d
e
12
B
a
y
l
o
r
4
9
C
o
o
k
e
8
6
G
i
l
l
e
s
p
i
e
1
2
3
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
1
6
0
M
a
s
o
n
1
9
7
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
2
3
4
V
a
n
Z
a
n
d
t
13
B
e
e
5
0
C
o
r
y
e
l
l
8
7
G
l
a
s
s
c
o
c
k
1
2
4
J
i
m
H
o
g
g
1
6
1
M
a
t
a
g
o
r
d
a
1
9
8
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
o
n
2
3
5
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
14
B
e
l
l
5
1
C
o
t
t
l
e
8
8
G
o
l
i
a
d
1
2
5
J
i
m
W
e
l
l
s
1
6
2
M
a
v
e
r
i
c
k
1
9
9
R
o
c
k
w
e
l
l
2
3
6
W
a
l
k
e
r
15
B
e
x
a
r
5
2
C
r
a
n
e
8
9
G
o
n
z
a
l
e
s
1
2
6
J
o
h
n
s
o
n
1
6
3
M
e
d
i
n
a
2
0
0
R
u
n
n
e
l
s
2
3
7
W
a
l
l
e
r
16
B
l
a
n
c
o
5
3
C
r
o
c
k
e
t
t
9
0
G
r
a
y
1
2
7
J
o
n
e
s
1
6
4
M
e
n
a
r
d
2
0
1
R
u
s
k
2
3
8
W
a
r
d
17
B
o
r
d
e
n
5
4
C
r
o
s
b
y
9
1
G
r
a
y
s
o
n
1
2
8
K
a
r
n
e
s
1
6
5
M
i
d
l
a
n
d
2
0
2
S
a
b
i
n
e
2
3
9
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
18
B
o
s
q
u
e
5
5
C
u
l
b
e
r
s
o
n
9
2
G
r
e
g
g
1
2
9
K
a
u
f
m
a
n
1
6
6
M
i
l
a
n
2
0
3
S
a
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
i
n
e
2
4
0
W
e
b
b
19
B
o
w
i
e
5
6
D
a
l
l
a
m
9
3
G
r
i
m
e
s
1
3
0
K
e
n
d
a
l
l
1
6
7
M
i
l
l
s
2
0
4
S
a
n
J
a
c
i
n
t
o
2
4
1
W
h
a
r
t
o
n
20
B
r
a
z
o
r
i
a
5
7
D
a
l
l
a
s
9
4
G
u
a
d
a
l
u
p
e
1
3
1
K
e
n
e
d
y
1
6
8
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
2
0
5
S
a
n
P
a
t
r
i
c
i
o
2
4
2
W
h
e
e
l
e
r
21
B
r
a
z
o
s
5
8
D
a
w
s
o
n
9
5
H
a
l
e
1
3
2
K
e
n
t
1
6
9
M
o
n
t
a
g
u
e
2
0
6
S
a
n
S
a
b
a
2
4
3
W
i
c
h
i
t
a
22
B
r
e
w
s
t
e
r
5
9
D
e
a
f
S
m
i
t
h
9
6
H
a
l
l
1
3
3
K
e
r
r
1
7
0
M
o
n
t
g
o
m
e
r
y
2
0
7
S
c
h
l
e
i
c
h
e
r
2
4
4
W
i
l
b
a
r
g
e
r
23
B
r
i
s
c
o
e
6
0
D
e
l
t
a
9
7
H
a
m
i
l
t
o
n
1
3
4
K
i
m
b
l
e
1
7
1
M
o
o
r
e
2
0
8
S
c
u
r
r
y
2
4
5
W
i
l
l
a
c
y
24
B
r
o
o
k
s
6
1
D
e
n
t
o
n
9
8
H
a
n
s
f
o
r
d
1
3
5
K
i
n
g
1
7
2
M
o
r
r
i
s
2
0
9
S
h
a
c
k
e
l
f
o
r
d
2
4
6
W
i
l
l
i
a
m
s
o
n
25
B
r
o
w
n
6
2
D
e
W
i
t
t
9
9
H
a
r
d
e
m
a
n
1
3
6
K
i
n
n
e
y
1
7
3
M
o
t
l
e
y
2
1
0
S
h
e
l
b
y
2
4
7
W
i
l
s
o
n
26
B
u
r
l
e
s
o
n
6
3
D
i
c
k
e
n
s
1
0
0
H
a
r
d
i
n
1
3
7
K
l
e
b
e
r
g
1
7
4
N
a
c
o
g
d
o
c
h
e
s
2
1
1
S
h
e
r
m
a
n
2
4
8
W
i
n
k
l
e
r
27
B
u
r
n
e
t
6
4
D
i
m
m
i
t
1
0
1
H
a
r
r
i
s
1
3
8
K
n
o
x
1
7
5
N
a
v
a
r
r
o
2
1
2
S
m
i
t
h
2
4
9
W
i
s
e
28
C
a
l
d
w
e
l
l
6
5
D
o
n
l
e
y
1
0
2
H
a
r
r
i
s
o
n
1
3
9
L
a
m
a
r
1
7
6
N
e
w
t
o
n
2
1
3
S
o
m
e
r
v
i
l
l
e
2
5
0
W
o
o
d
29
C
a
l
h
o
u
n
6
6
D
u
v
a
l
1
0
3
H
a
r
t
l
e
y
1
4
0
L
a
m
b
1
7
7
N
o
l
a
n
2
1
4
S
t
a
r
r
2
5
1
Y
o
a
k
u
m
30
C
a
l
l
a
h
a
n
6
7
E
a
s
t
l
a
n
d
1
0
4
Ha
s
k
e
l
l
1
4
1
L
a
m
p
a
s
a
s
1
7
8
N
u
ec
e
s
2
1
5
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
s
2
5
2
Y
o
u
n
g
31
C
a
m
e
r
o
n
6
8
E
c
t
o
r
1
0
5
H
a
y
s
1
4
2
L
a
S
a
l
l
e
1
7
9
O
c
h
i
l
t
r
e
e
2
1
6
S
t
e
r
l
i
n
g
2
5
3
Z
a
p
a
t
a
32
C
a
m
p
6
9
E
d
w
a
r
d
s
1
0
6
H
e
m
p
h
i
l
l
1
4
3
L
a
v
a
c
a
1
8
0
O
l
d
h
a
m
2
1
7
S
t
o
n
e
w
a
l
l
2
5
4
Z
a
v
a
l
a
33
C
a
r
s
o
n
7
0
E
l
l
i
s
1
0
7
H
e
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
1
4
4
L
e
e
1
8
1
O
r
a
n
g
e
2
1
8
S
u
t
t
o
n
34
C
a
s
s
7
1
E
l
P
a
s
o
1
0
8
H
i
d
a
l
g
o
1
4
5
L
e
o
n
1
8
2
P
a
l
o
P
i
n
t
o
2
1
9
S
w
i
s
h
e
r
35
C
a
s
t
r
o
7
2
E
r
a
t
h
1
0
9
H
i
l
l
1
4
6
L
i
b
e
r
t
y
1
8
3
P
a
n
o
l
a
2
2
0
T
a
r
r
a
n
t
36
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
7
3
F
a
l
l
s
1
1
0
H
o
c
k
l
e
y
1
4
7
L
i
m
e
s
t
o
n
e
1
8
4
P
a
r
k
e
r
2
2
1
T
a
y
l
o
r
37
C
h
e
r
o
k
e
e
7
4
F
a
n
n
i
n
1
1
1
H
o
o
d
1
4
8
L
i
p
s
c
o
m
b
1
8
5
P
a
r
m
e
r
2
2
2
T
e
r
r
e
l
l
6545s3
CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM
6545s3
SITE DIAGRAMS
Scale In Feet
Source: Bing Maps - 2011Path:S:\EMI
Shared\Projects
Directory\Intercompany\112C06196
-
La
Porte\Figure1LaPorte.mxd
0 25 5012.5
South
2nd
Street
SITE MANAGER: J. BLANKEN
CHECKED BY: B. REED
DRAWN BY: T. FEGTER
DATE: 12-20-13
DWG NO.:
SCALE: AS NOTED
PROJ. NO.: 112C06196
N
CITY OF LA PORTE
"GHOST" UNDERGROUND
STORAGE TANK REMOVALS
120 SOUTH SECOND STREET
LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
West A Street
Tank Hold
South
3rd
Street
CHECKED BY: B. REED
DRAWN BY: T. FEGTER
DATE: 12-20-13
DWG. NO.:PROJ. NO.: 112C06196
SCALE: AS NOTED
SITE MANAGER: J. BLANKEN
N
Scale in Feet
120
CITY OF LA PORTE
"GHOST" UNDERGROUND
STORAGE TANK REMOVALS
120 SOUTH SECOND STREET
LA PORTE, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
63
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2
EXCAVATION
SAMPLE LOCATION
S-1T2-N
BUILDING
WEST A STREET
S:\EMIShared\Projects
Directory\Intercompany\112C06196-La
Porte\Figure
2
LaPorte.dwg
FORMER BUILDING
STOCKPILES
TANK
1
TANK
2
T2-S
T1-N
T1-S
NOTE: SAMPLE "TANK" WAS COLLECTED FROM COMPOSITE SLUDGE MATERIAL FOUND IN USTs
T2-S2
6545s3
WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF TANK REMOVAL
AND SITE SAMPLING ACTIVITIES
6545s1
WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF REMOVAL ACTIVITIES
The City of La Porte contracted Effective Environmental (E2) to remove a ghost petroleum
underground storage tank (UST) system discovered during the construction of a new parking lot
at 120 S. 2nd Street, La Porte, Harris County, Texas (Figure 1). Two 1,000-gallon steel USTs
were removed and disposed of during the removal activities. As part of the UST removal
activities, the USTs were uncovered, purged of residual product, and washed with soap and
water. The fluids generated during the removal of the UST system were recovered by an Action
Resources vacuum truck for off-site disposal at E2’s used oil recycling facility in Pasadena,
Texas. Following the fluids removal and the triple washings, each UST was tested for
flammable vapors using a Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) meter. At the time of removal, the
USTs contained a LEL of zero percent.
Immediately upon removal from the tankhold, each UST was loaded onto a trailer and
transported directly the Texas Port Recycling facility in Houston, Texas for destruction. The
excavated soil (~50 cubic yards) was stockpiled on plastic sheeting on site during the removal
activities. The USTs were inspected and were noted to be in poor condition with noted cracks,
holes, and rust. Following sampling (see below), the excavations were backfilled with clean
imported fill by the City of La Porte.
During removal activities the field personnel noted the USTs contain a significant amount of
residual sludge. This sludge was solidified using fly ash, sampled, and placed into roll-off boxes
pending analytical results. Additionally the soil removed during the UST removal activities was
stockpiled on plastic, sampled, and covered on site, pending analytical results.
WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF SITE SAMPLING ACTIVITIES
Following removal of the UST systems, samples were collected in accordance with the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQs) guidance document RG-411. No tankhold
water was present, or sampled during the removal activities. The tanks were not longer than 20
feet; therefore, two tank bottom confirmation samples were collected beneath each tank
following their removals. No piping was attached to the UST; therefore, no piping samples were
collected. See Figure 2 for sample location details.
The soil samples were collected from approximately one foot depth into native soil. The tank
bottom confirmation sample was collected from a total depth of approximately 6 feet below
grade. Additionally, one composite soil samples were collected from the excavated stock pile
from at least one foot depth in the soil pile, at an approximate frequency of one sample per 50
cubic yards.
During collection, the soil samples were immediately placed in a new, clean laboratory-supplied
container and placed on ice for preservation. The samples were labeled to indicate the sample
ID, collection date, time, site location, and analyses to be performed. New disposable nitrile
gloves were donned and replaced between all sample collections.
6545s1
The soil samples retained for laboratory analyses were submitted to ALS Laboratories
(a NELAC-accredited laboratory) under strict chain-of-custody documentation and analyzed
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) per Solid Waste (SW)-846 Method 8260C, and total
petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by TCEQ Method 1005. The samples with the highest detections
of TPH above the C-12 range, per source area, were additionally analyzed for polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by method 8270. Additionally, the samples collected from the
tank sludge and the excavation materials were analyzed for total metals per method 6020/7471A
for waste characterization purposes.
Analytical results indicated an exceedance of benzene in the tank bottom confirmation sample
“T1-S”. The remaining analytical results did not contain detections of VOCs exceeding their
respective TCEQ Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Program or Texas Risk Reduction Program
(TRRP) action levels for the tank bottom confirmation sample. Analytical results for the sludge
(sample ID “Tank”) found within the USTs, and the excavated soil (sample ID “S-1”) also
reported elevated concentrations of benzene; however, these materials were containerized and
have been properly disposed of. Sludge sample “Tank” additionally reported an elevated
concentration of lead. The soil samples designated for PAH analyses; reported no exceedances
of their respective TCEQ PST Program action levels.
On November 19, 2013, E2 returned to the site for the removal the impacted soil located at
sample location “T1-S”. The area of “T1-S” was over excavated three additional feet to a total
depth of nine feet below ground surface and resampled (sample ID “T1-S2”) for VOCs and TPH
analysis. The over excavated material was added to the stockpiled soil, and covered, pending
analytical results. Analytical results indicated no additional detections of VOCs or TPH in
sample “T1-S2”. On December 4, 2013, a total of 100 cubic yards impacted soil was removed
from the site and disposed of at HPP’s facility in Baytown, Texas. Additionally, on
December 5, 2013, 30 cubic yards of solidified sludge was disposed of at HPP’s Baytown, Texas
facility.
This site is in the process of being developed into a new paved parking area for the City of
La Porte’s new fire station. Given the future use of this site will be a parking lot and the
remediation activities already complete, no further action is recommended and the site should be
granted closure.
6545s3
ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY TABLE AND
LABORATORY REPORT
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA
City of La Porte
"Ghost" Underground Storage Tank Removals
120 South 2nd Street
La Porte, Harris County, Texas
(mg/kg)
Depth (feet):
Sample Date:
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzene0.120.00072U 6.4 0.00075U0.00074U0.0088 0.245.9
Toluene39.10.0010J330.00087U0.00087U0.0026J8.228
Ethylbenzene36.80.0011U120.0011U0.0011U0.0317.215
Total Xylenes117.00.0031U480.0032U0.0032U0.0203655
Acetone42.7*0.0710.057U0.0057U0.130.0270.060U0.062
Cyclohexane5882*0.00980.510.0015U0.0015U0.0110.046J0.020
Isopropylbenzene347*0.0012U0.200.0012U0.0012U0.00740.200.26
Methylcyclohexane15553*0.03100.250.0019U0.0019U0.0110.055J0.26
Oxygenates
MTBE2.560.0023U0.023U0.0024U0.0024U0.0023U0.025U0.025U
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH (C6-C12)NA12U11012U16J14J3701600
TPH (C12-C28)NA60J7612U23031013005800
TPH (C28-C35)NA12U12U12U12U12U26U130U
TPH (C6-C35) Total NA 60J18612U24632416707400
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Acenaphthene34.10.00098U
Acenaphthylene54.70.00086U
Anthracene2.040.0015U
Benzo(a)anthracene0.8770.0011U
Benzo(a) pyrene0.08770.00073U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene0.8770.00086U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene0.8240.00086U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene1.350.00086U
Chrysene1.240.00073U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene0.08770.0012U
Dibenzofuran48.80.0012U
Fluoranthene25.50.00098U
Fluorene30.20.020
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene0.8770.0011U
Naphthalene99.70.00098U
Phenanthrene28.20.0089
Pyrene10.30.00073U
Antimony1**0.186U0.242U
Arsenic5.9**1.873.26
Barium443*128352
Beryllium1.5**0.9591.34
Cadmium1.5*0.0466U0.106J
Chromium (Total)30**11.222.7
Lead15**12.1 20.9
Mercury0.04**0.005060.00105J
Nickel157*7.6110.6
Selenium2.3*0.9091.14
Silver0.47*0.0745U0.0966U
Vanadium50**1825.5
Zinc2360*20.6157
Notes:
Bold values exceed their respective Action Levels
U - Nondetect at sample detection limit.
J - Value reported was above the sample detection limit but below the the method quantitation limit.
* - Indicates Texas Risk Reduction Program Class 1 protective concentration limit for the soil to groundwater ingestion pathway
** - Texas Specific Background Concentration
Only BTEX and detected VOCs are included on this table.
Blank cells were not analyzed.
MTBE - Methyl tert-butyl ether.
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram.
Inorganics (Metals)
ANALYTE
PST Program
Action Levels-
Surface Soil
(0-15 ft)T1-NT1-ST1-S2
Sample Identification
T2-ST2-NS-1Tank
(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
NANA
(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
6.06.09.06.06.0
11/15/1311/15/1311/15/1311/15/1311/21/1311/15/1311/15/13
6545s5 1 of 1
20-Nov-2013
Effective Environmental Inc.
Bruce MacDonald
Dear Bruce,
Re:City of LaPorte UST Work Order:1311812
Fax:(713) 672-6101Tel:(713) 672-6100
9950 Chemical Road
Pasadena, TX 77507
ALS Environmental received 8 samples on 15-Nov-2013 04:22 PM for the analyses presented in the
following report.
Project Manager
Kristin M Brown
Electronically approved by: Dayna.Fisher
Certificate No: TX: T104704231-13-12
The analytical data provided relates directly to the samples received by ALS Environmental and for only
the analyses requested. Results are expressed as "as received" unless otherwise noted.
QC sample results for this data met EPA or laboratory specifications except as noted in the Case
Narrative or as noted with qualifiers in the QC batch information. Should this laboratory report need to be
reproduced, it should be reproduced in full unless written approval has been obtained by ALS
Environmental. Samples will be disposed in 30 days unless storage arrangements are made.
The total number of pages in this report is 54.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887
ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page 1 of 54
20-Nov-13Date:ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
This data package consists of all or some of the following as applicable:
This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data:
R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;
R2 Sample identification cross-reference;
R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes:
a) Items consistent with NELAC Chapter 5,
b) dilution factors,
c) preparation methods,
d) cleanup methods, and
e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs).
R4 Surrogate recovery data including:
a) Calculated recovery (%R), and
b) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.
R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;
R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:
a) LCS spiking amounts,
b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and
c)The laboratory’s LCS QC limits.
R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:
a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,
b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,
c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,
d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and
e) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits.
R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision:
a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,
b) the calculated RPD, and
c) the laboratory’s QC limits for analytical duplicates.
R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) and detectability check sample results for each
analyte for each method and matrix.
R10 Other problems or anomalies.
The Exception Report for each “No” or “Not Reviewed (NR)” item in Laboratory Review
Checklist and for each analyte, matrix, and method for which the laboratory does not hold
NELAC accreditation under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Page 2 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This laboratory is NELAC
accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for all the methods, analytes and matrices reported in
this data package except as noted in the Exception Reports. The data have been reviewed and are technically
compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached exception
reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed by the
laboratory have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information affecting
the quality of the data has been knowingly withheld.
Check, if applicable: [NA] This laboratory meets an exception under 30 TAC §25.6 and was last inspected by [ ]
TCEQ or [ ] ______________ on (enter date of last inspection). Any findings affecting the data in this laboratory
data package are noted in the Exception Reports herein. The official signing the cover page of the report in which
these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release
statement is true.
Kristin M Brown
Kristin M Brown
Project Manager
Page 3 of 54
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/20/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 1311812
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown
Prep Batch Number(s): 74744, 74754, 74759, R157303,
R157325, R157388
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
R1 OI Chain-of-custody (C-O-C)
Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability
upon receipt? X
Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? X
R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification
Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? X
Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? X
R3 OI Test reports
Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? X
Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by
calibration standards? X
Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were sample detection limits reported for all analytes not detected? X
Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X
Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? X
Were bulk soils/solids samples for volatile analysis extracted with methanol per
SW-846 Method 5035? X
If required for the project, TICs reported? X
R4 O Surrogate recovery data
Were surrogates added prior to extraction? X
Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC
limits? X 1
R5 OI Test reports/summary forms for blank samples
Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? X
Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including
preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? X
Were blank concentrations < MQL? X
R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS):
Were all COCs included in the LCS? X
Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and
cleanup steps? X
Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X
Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X
Does the detectability data document the laboratory’s capability to detect the
COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SDLs? X
Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? X
R7 OI Matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) data
Were the project/method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? X
Were MS/MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X 2
Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? X 3
R8 OI Analytical duplicate data
Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? X
Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? X
R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs):
Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? X
Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration
standard? X
Are unadjusted MQLs and DCSs included in the laboratory data package? X
R10 OI Other problems/anomalies
Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and
ER? X 4
Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X
Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SDL and minimize
the matrix interference affects on the sample results? X
Is the laboratory NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Program for
the analytes, matrices and methods associated with this laboratory data package? X 5
Page 4 of 54
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/20/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 1311812
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74744, 74754, 74759, R157303, R157325,
R157388
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
S1 OI Initial calibration (ICAL)
Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC
limits? X
Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X
Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? X
Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to
calculate the curve? X
Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? X
Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source
standard? X
S2 OI
Initial and continuing calibration verification (ICCV and CCV) and
continuing calibration blank (CCB)
Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? X
Were percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? X
Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X
Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL? X 6
S3 O Mass spectral tuning:
Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? X
Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC limits? X
S4 O Internal standards (IS):
Were IS area counts and retention times within the method-required QC limits? X
S5 OI
Raw data (NELAC section 1 appendix A glossary, and section 5.12 or ISO/IEC
17025 section
Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an
analyst? X
Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X
S6 O Dual column confirmation
Did dual column confirmation results meet the method-required QC? X
S7 O Tentatively identified compounds (TICs):
If TICs were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate
checks? X
S8 I Interference Check Sample (ICS) results:
Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? X
S9 I Serial dilutions, post digestion spikes, and method of standard additions
Were percent differences, recoveries, and the linearity within the QC limits
specified in the method? X
S10 OI Method detection limit (MDL) studies
Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? X
Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs? X
S11 OI Proficiency test reports:
Was the laboratory's performance acceptable on the applicable proficiency tests or
evaluation studies? X
S12 OI Standards documentation
Are all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other
appropriate sources? X
S13 OI Compound/analyte identification procedures
Are the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? X
S14 OI Demonstration of analyst competency (DOC)
Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? X
Is documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? X
S15 OI
Verification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or
ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5)
Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated,
where applicable? X
S16 OI Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):
Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); NA = Not Applicable; NR = Not Reviewed; R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 5 of 54
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/20/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 1311812
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown
Prep Batch Number(s): 74744, 74754, 74759, R157303,
R157325, R157388
ER#5 Description
1
Texas TPH Method TX1005 surrogate recovery, 2-Fluorobiphenyl, was above the control limits for Samples "S-1"and "Tank". Results
confirmed as sample matrix interference by original run.
2
Batch 74744, Total Metals by Method SW6020, Sample 1311609-01 MS and MSD were performed on an unrelated sample
Batch R157325, Volatile Organis Method SW8260, Sample “T2-S”: MS/MSD recoveries were above the control limits for Acetone due to
possible matrix interference. The associated LCS recoveries and MS/MSD RPD were within the control limits.
3
Batch 74759, Texas TPH Method TX1005, Sample "T1-N" : MSD RPD was outside the control limits for nC6 to nC12.
4
Client cancelled metals analysis for Samples T1-N, T1-S, T2-S, T2-N by phone 11/18/13.
Client changed VOC list to TCL4.3 instead of BTEX/MTBE as stated on the chain of custody 11/18/13.
5
With the exception of cyclohexane, ALS is NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Program for the analytes, matrices and methods
associated with this laboratory data package. Because TCEQ does not offer accreditation for this compound, the results are flagged with n.
6
Method 6020A requires the CCB to contain target analytes less than the established lower limit of quantitation (PQL). At ALS-Houston,
CCBs for Method 6020A are evaluated to ½ PQL for all metals except for Al, Bi, B, C, Li, Mg, K, Na, Sr, Sn, Zn and Zr. The exceptions
are evaluated to the less than the PQL per Method 6020A.
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be
retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period.
O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable);
NA = Not Applicable;
NR = Not Reviewed;
R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 6 of 54
Date: 20-Nov-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812 Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold
1311812-01T1-N Soil 11/15/2013 14:15 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-02T1-S Soil 11/15/2013 14:18 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-03T2-S Soil 11/15/2013 14:20 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-04T2-N Soil 11/15/2013 14:22 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-05S-1 Soil 11/15/2013 14:45 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-06Tank Soil 11/15/2013 14:50 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-07Trip Blank 111213-35 Water 11/15/2013 11/15/2013 16:22
1311812-08Trip Blank 11121336 Water 11/15/2013 11/15/2013 16:22
SS Page 1 of 1
Page 7 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-N
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:15 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-01
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 11/19/2013 03:5259mg/Kg-dry1U12
>nC12 to nC28 J11/19/2013 03:5259mg/Kg-dry 16012
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 03:5259mg/Kg-dry1U12
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon J11/19/2013 03:5259mg/Kg-dry 160.0 12
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/19/2013 03:5270-130%REC 1129
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 03:5270-130%REC 1119
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0024
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0018
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00084
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00096
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00072
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00084
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0026
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Acetone 11/18/2013 13:100.024mg/Kg-dry 10.071 0.0055
Benzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00072
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00072
Bromoform 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00084
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0014
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Chloroform 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0018
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
Cyclohexane n11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry 10.0098 0.0014
AR Page 1 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 8 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-N
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:15 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-01
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0017
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 13:100.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0023
Methylcyclohexane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry 10.031 0.0018
o-Xylene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Styrene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00072
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Toluene J11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry 10.0010 0.00084
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00060
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 13:100.0060mg/Kg-dry1U0.00096
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 13:100.0024mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 13:100.018mg/Kg-dry1U0.0031
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 13:1070-128%REC 190.7
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:1073-126%REC 197.3
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 13:1071-128%REC 196.7
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 13:1073-127%REC 198.3
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%116.6 0.010
AR Page 2 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 9 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-S
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:18 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-02
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 11/19/2013 05:2962mg/Kg-dry 111012
>nC12 to nC28 11/19/2013 05:2962mg/Kg-dry 17612
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 05:2962mg/Kg-dry1U12
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/19/2013 05:2962mg/Kg-dry 118612
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/19/2013 05:2970-130%REC 1127
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 05:2970-130%REC 1117
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.016
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.025
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.019
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.016
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0086
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0099
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0074
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0086
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.027
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Acetone 11/18/2013 11:370.25mg/Kg-dry10U0.057
Benzene 11/18/2013 13:360.62mg/Kg-dry 1006.4 0.074
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0074
Bromoform 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0086
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.015
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Chloroform 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.022
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.019
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
Cyclohexane n11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry 100.51 0.015
AR Page 3 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 10 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-S
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:18 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-02
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.022
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.12mg/Kg-dry10U0.017
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 13:360.62mg/Kg-dry 100120.11
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry 100.20 0.012
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 13:361.2mg/Kg-dry 100340.21
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.023
Methylcyclohexane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry 100.25 0.019
o-Xylene 11/18/2013 13:360.62mg/Kg-dry 100120.12
Styrene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0074
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Toluene 11/18/2013 15:266.2mg/Kg-dry 1000330.86
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0062
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 11:370.062mg/Kg-dry10U0.0099
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 11:370.025mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 13:361.9mg/Kg-dry 100480.32
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 11:3770-128%REC 1094.4
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 13:3670-128%REC 10081.7
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 15:2670-128%REC 100079.8
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 11:3773-126%REC 10103
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 13:3673-126%REC 10091.0
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 15:2673-126%REC 100085.7
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 11:3771-128%REC 1097.0
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 13:3671-128%REC 10085.5
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 15:2671-128%REC 100087.9
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 11:3773-127%REC 1097.5
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 13:3673-127%REC 10095.4
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 15:2673-127%REC 100096.7
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%119.0 0.010
AR Page 4 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 11 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T2-S
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:20 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-03
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 J11/19/2013 06:0162mg/Kg-dry 11612
>nC12 to nC28 11/19/2013 06:0162mg/Kg-dry 123012
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 06:0162mg/Kg-dry1U12
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/19/2013 06:0162mg/Kg-dry 124612
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/19/2013 06:0170-130%REC 1128
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 06:0170-130%REC 1114
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0025
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00099
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0027
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Acetone 11/18/2013 09:400.025mg/Kg-dry 10.13 0.0057
Benzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
Bromoform 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Chloroform 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Cyclohexanen11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
AR Page 5 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 12 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T2-S
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:20 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-03
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0017
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 09:400.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0024
Methylcyclohexane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
o-Xylene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Styrene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Toluene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 09:400.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00099
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 09:400.0025mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 09:400.019mg/Kg-dry1U0.0032
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 09:4070-128%REC 195.7
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 09:4073-126%REC 1103
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 09:4071-128%REC 197.1
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 09:4073-127%REC 199.2
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%119.3 0.010
AR Page 6 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 13 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T2-N
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:22 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-04
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 J11/19/2013 06:3361mg/Kg-dry 11412
>nC12 to nC28 11/19/2013 06:3361mg/Kg-dry 131012
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 06:3361mg/Kg-dry1U12
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/19/2013 06:3361mg/Kg-dry 132412
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/19/2013 06:3370-130%REC 1130
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 06:3370-130%REC 1124
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0025
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0018
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00098
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0027
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Acetone 11/18/2013 10:040.025mg/Kg-dry 10.027 0.0057
Benzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.0088 0.00074
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
Bromoform 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Chloroform 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0018
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
Cyclohexane n11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.011 0.0015
AR Page 7 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 14 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T2-N
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:22 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-04
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0017
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.031 0.0011
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.0074 0.0012
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 10:040.012mg/Kg-dry 10.018 0.0021
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0023
Methylcyclohexane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.011 0.0018
o-Xylene J11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.0017 0.0012
Styrene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00074
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Toluene J11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry 10.0026 0.00086
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00061
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:040.0061mg/Kg-dry1U0.00098
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 10:040.0025mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 10:040.018mg/Kg-dry 10.020 0.0032
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 10:0470-128%REC 197.3
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:0473-126%REC 1105
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:0471-128%REC 197.7
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 10:0473-127%REC 198.2
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%118.6 0.010
AR Page 8 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 15 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:S-1
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:45 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-05
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 11/19/2013 10:29130mg/Kg-dry 237026
>nC12 to nC28 11/19/2013 10:29130mg/Kg-dry 21,300 26
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 10:29130mg/Kg-dry2U26
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/19/2013 10:29130mg/Kg-dry 21,670 26
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl S 11/19/2013 10:2970-130%REC 2183
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 10:2970-130%REC 2113
MERCURY - SW7471B SW7471A Analyst:OFOPrep: SW7471A / 11/19/13Method:
Mercury 11/19/2013 15:350.00442mg/Kg-dry 10.00506 0.00063
METALS SW6020 Analyst:ALRPrep: SW3050A / 11/18/13Method:
Antimony 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry1U0.186
Arsenic 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 11.87 0.0931
Barium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 11280.0745
Beryllium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 10.959 0.0466
Cadmium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry1U0.0466
Chromium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 111.2 0.0838
Lead 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 112.1 0.0466
Nickel 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 17.61 0.0838
Selenium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 10.909 0.168
Silver 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry1U0.0745
Vanadium 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 118.0 0.214
Zinc 11/19/2013 15:220.466mg/Kg-dry 120.6 0.233
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.022
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.017
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.026
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.017
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0091
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.010
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0078
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0091
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.029
AR Page 9 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 16 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:S-1
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:45 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-05
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.022
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Acetone 11/18/2013 12:000.26mg/Kg-dry10U0.060
Benzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry 100.24 0.0078
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0078
Bromoform 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0091
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.016
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Chloroform 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.023
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
Cyclohexane Jn11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry 100.046 0.016
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.023
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.018
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 14:310.65mg/Kg-dry 1007.2 0.12
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry 100.20 0.013
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 14:311.3mg/Kg-dry 100240.22
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.025
Methylcyclohexane J11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry 100.055 0.020
o-Xylene 11/18/2013 14:310.65mg/Kg-dry 1009.5 0.13
Styrene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0078
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Toluene 11/18/2013 14:310.65mg/Kg-dry 1008.2 0.091
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.0065
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 12:000.065mg/Kg-dry10U0.010
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 12:000.026mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 14:312.0mg/Kg-dry 100360.34
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 12:0070-128%REC 1091.3
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 14:3170-128%REC 10085.8
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 12:0073-126%REC 10101
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 14:3173-126%REC 10090.2
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 12:0071-128%REC 1093.1
AR Page 10 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 17 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:S-1
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:45 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-05
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 14:3171-128%REC 10086.0
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 12:0073-127%REC 1099.6
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 14:3173-127%REC 10093.1
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%123.1 0.010
AR Page 11 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 18 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:Tank
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:50 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-06
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/18/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 11/19/2013 10:29670mg/Kg-dry 101,600 130
>nC12 to nC28 11/19/2013 10:29670mg/Kg-dry 105,800 130
>nC28 to nC35 11/19/2013 10:29670mg/Kg-dry10U130
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/19/2013 10:29670mg/Kg-dry 107,400 130
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl S 11/19/2013 10:2970-130%REC 10232
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/19/2013 10:2970-130%REC 10114
MERCURY - SW7471B SW7471A Analyst:OFOPrep: SW7471A / 11/19/13Method:
Mercury J11/19/2013 15:370.00477mg/Kg-dry 10.00105 0.00067
METALS SW6020 Analyst:ALRPrep: SW3050A / 11/18/13Method:
Antimony 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry1U0.242
Arsenic 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 13.26 0.121
Barium 11/19/2013 15:416.04mg/Kg-dry 103520.966
Beryllium 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 11.34 0.0604
Cadmium J11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 10.106 0.0604
Chromium 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 122.7 0.109
Lead 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 120.9 0.0604
Nickel 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 110.6 0.109
Selenium 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 11.14 0.217
Silver 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry1U0.0966
Vanadium 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 125.5 0.278
Zinc 11/19/2013 15:270.604mg/Kg-dry 11570.302
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:WLRMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.023
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.017
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.027
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.017
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0094
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0080
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0094
2-Butanone 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.029
AR Page 12 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 19 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:Tank
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:50 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-06
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
2-Hexanone 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.023
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Acetone 11/18/2013 10:500.27mg/Kg-dry10U0.062
Benzene 11/18/2013 14:040.67mg/Kg-dry 1005.9 0.080
Bromodichloromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0080
Bromoform 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0094
Bromomethane 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Carbon disulfide 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
Carbon tetrachloride 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.016
Chlorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
Chloroethane 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Chloroform 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.024
Chloromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.020
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
Cyclohexane n11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry 100.20 0.016
Dibromochloromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.024
Dichloromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.13mg/Kg-dry10U0.019
Ethylbenzene 11/18/2013 14:040.67mg/Kg-dry 100150.12
Isopropylbenzene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry 100.26 0.013
m,p-Xylene 11/18/2013 14:041.3mg/Kg-dry 100400.23
Methyl acetate 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.025
Methylcyclohexane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry 100.26 0.020
o-Xylene 11/18/2013 14:040.67mg/Kg-dry 100130.13
Styrene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0080
Tetrachloroethene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Toluene 11/18/2013 14:040.67mg/Kg-dry 100280.094
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.012
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.0067
Trichloroethene 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.021
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:500.067mg/Kg-dry10U0.011
Vinyl chloride 11/18/2013 10:500.027mg/Kg-dry10U0.013
Xylenes, Total 11/18/2013 14:042.0mg/Kg-dry 100550.35
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 10:5070-128%REC 1084.7
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/18/2013 14:0470-128%REC 10088.5
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 10:5073-126%REC 10102
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/18/2013 14:0473-126%REC 10096.6
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 10:5071-128%REC 1091.4
AR Page 13 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 20 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:Tank
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:50 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:1311812-06
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
SDL
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/18/2013 14:0471-128%REC 10089.2
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 10:5073-127%REC 1098.4
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/18/2013 14:0473-127%REC 10095.9
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%125.3 0.010
AR Page 14 of 14
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 21 of 54
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
C
l
i
e
n
t
S
a
m
p
l
e
I
D
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
Ma
t
r
i
x
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
D
a
t
e
DATES REPORT20-Nov-13
Wo
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
:
13
1
1
8
1
2
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
n
c
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
a
P
o
r
t
e
U
S
T
AL
S
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Pr
e
p
D
a
t
e
TC
L
P
D
a
t
e
74
7
4
4
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Me
t
a
l
s
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
C
S
-
1
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
2
2
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
0
0
A
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
C
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
2
7
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
0
0
A
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
4
1
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
0
0
A
M
74
7
5
4
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Me
r
c
u
r
y
-
S
W
7
4
7
1
B
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
C
S
-
1
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
3
5
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
4
8
A
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
C
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
3
7
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
4
8
A
M
74
7
5
9
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Te
x
a
s
T
P
H
-
T
X
1
0
0
5
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
1
B
T
1
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
5
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
5
2
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
2
B
T
1
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
8
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
5
:
2
9
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
3
B
T
2
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
6
:
0
1
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
4
B
T
2
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
2
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
0
6
:
3
3
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
B
S
-
1
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
2
9
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
B
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
9
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
2
9
A
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
R1
5
7
3
0
3
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
TC
L
V
o
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
-
S
W
8
2
6
0
C
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
2
A
T
1
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
8
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
1
:
3
6
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
3
:
2
6
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
A
S
-
1
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
2
:
3
1
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
A
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
2
:
0
4
P
M
1Page:
Pa
g
e
22
of
54
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
C
l
i
e
n
t
S
a
m
p
l
e
I
D
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
Ma
t
r
i
x
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
D
a
t
e
DATES REPORT20-Nov-13
Wo
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
:
13
1
1
8
1
2
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
n
c
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
a
P
o
r
t
e
U
S
T
AL
S
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Pr
e
p
D
a
t
e
TC
L
P
D
a
t
e
R1
5
7
3
2
5
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
TC
L
V
o
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
-
S
W
8
2
6
0
C
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
1
A
T
1
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
5
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
1
:
1
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
2
A
T
1
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
8
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
3
7
A
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
3
A
T
2
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
0
9
:
4
0
A
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
4
A
T
2
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
2
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
0
4
A
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
A
S
-
1
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
A
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
0
:
5
0
A
M
R1
5
7
3
8
8
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Mo
i
s
t
u
r
e
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
1
C
T
1
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
5
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
2
C
T
1
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
1
8
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
3
C
T
2
-
S
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
4
C
T
2
-
N
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
2
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
5
C
S
-
1
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
4
5
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
13
1
1
8
1
2
-
0
6
C
T
a
n
k
11
/
15
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
5
0
:
0
0
P
M
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
2Page:
Pa
g
e
23
of
54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:Moisture
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:MOIST_SW3550
Test Number:SW3550
Units:wt%Matrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:Balance1
DCS
Spike
Percent MoistureA MOIST 0.0100.01000
Page 1 of 8
Page 24 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:Texas TPH - TX1005
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:TX1005_S_REV3
Test Number:TX1005
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:FID-12
DCS
Spike
>nC12 to nC28A TPHDRO 50102522
>nC28 to nC35A 10W40MOTO
ROIL
50102522
nC6 to nC12A TPHGRO 50102522
Total Petroleum HydrocarbonM TPH 50105044
Surr: 2-FluorobiphenylS 321-60-8 0000
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzeneS 98-08-8 0000
Page 2 of 8
Page 25 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:Texas TPH - TX1005
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:TX1005_S_REV3
Test Number:TX1005
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:FID-13
DCS
Spike
>nC12 to nC28A TPHDRO 50102523
>nC28 to nC35A 10W40MOTO
ROIL
50102523
nC6 to nC12A TPHGRO 50102525
Total Petroleum HydrocarbonM TPH 50105047
Surr: 2-FluorobiphenylS 321-60-8 0000
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzeneS 98-08-8 0000
Page 3 of 8
Page 26 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:Mercury - SW7471B
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:HG_S_LOW
Test Number:SW7471A
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:HG02
DCS
Spike
MercuryA 7439-97-6 0.00330.000470.0017 0.00093
Page 4 of 8
Page 27 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:Metals
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:ICP_S_Low
Test Number:SW6020
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:ICP7500
DCS
Spike
AntimonyA 7440-36-0 0.5000.2000.250 0.261
ArsenicA 7440-38-2 0.5000.1000.250 0.299
BariumA 7440-39-3 0.5000.08000.250 0.286
BerylliumA 7440-41-7 0.5000.05000.100 0.0758
CadmiumA 7440-43-9 0.5000.05000.100 0.0727
ChromiumA 7440-47-3 0.5000.09000.250 0.286
LeadA 7439-92-1 0.5000.05000.250 0.250
NickelA 7440-02-0 0.5000.09000.250 0.273
SeleniumA 7782-49-2 0.5000.1800.250 0.326
SilverA 7440-22-4 0.5000.08000.250 0.239
VanadiumA 7440-62-2 0.5000.2300.250 0.295
ZincA 7440-66-6 0.5000.2500.250 0.329
Page 5 of 8
Page 28 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:TCL Volatiles - SW8260C
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:8260_TCL4.3_S
Test Number:SW8260
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:VOA3
DCS
Spike
BenzeneA 71-43-2 0.00500.000600.0012 0.0010
EthylbenzeneA 100-41-4 0.00500.000900.0012 0.00094
m,p-XyleneA 179601-23-1 0.0100.00170.0025 0.0023
o-XyleneA 95-47-6 0.00500.00100.0012 0.0010
TolueneA 108-88-3 0.00500.000700.0012 0.0011
Xylenes, TotalM 1330-20-7 0.0150.00260.0038 0.0033
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4S 17060-07-0 0000
Surr: 4-BromofluorobenzeneS 460-00-4 0000
Surr: DibromofluoromethaneS 1868-53-7 0000
Surr: Toluene-d8S 2037-26-5 0000
Page 6 of 8
Page 29 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
Test Name:TCL Volatiles - SW8260C
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:8260_TCL4.3_S
Test Number:SW8260
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:1311812
DCS
InstrumentID:VOA5
DCS
Spike
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneA 71-55-6 0.00500.00170.0025 0.0020
1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneA 79-34-5 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0019
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethaneA 76-13-1 0.00500.00130.0025 0.0019
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneA 79-00-5 0.00500.00200.0025 0.0019
1,1-DichloroethaneA 75-34-3 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0021
1,1-DichloroetheneA 75-35-4 0.00500.00150.0025 0.0022
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneA 120-82-1 0.00500.000900.0025 0.0019
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropaneA 96-12-8 0.00500.00130.0025 0.0021
1,2-DibromoethaneA 106-93-4 0.00500.000700.0025 0.0020
1,2-DichlorobenzeneA 95-50-1 0.00500.000800.0025 0.0019
1,2-DichloroethaneA 107-06-2 0.00500.000600.0025 0.0021
1,2-DichloropropaneA 78-87-5 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0022
1,3-DichlorobenzeneA 541-73-1 0.00500.000900.0025 0.0019
1,4-DichlorobenzeneA 106-46-7 0.00500.000700.0025 0.0019
2-ButanoneA 78-93-3 0.0100.00220.0050 0.0051
2-HexanoneA 591-78-6 0.0100.00170.0050 0.0047
4-Methyl-2-pentanoneA 108-10-1 0.0100.00100.0050 0.0041
AcetoneA 67-64-1 0.0200.00460.0050 0.0020
BenzeneA 71-43-2 0.00500.000600.0025 0.0020
BromodichloromethaneA 75-27-4 0.00500.000600.0025 0.0019
BromoformA 75-25-2 0.00500.000700.0025 0.0024
BromomethaneA 74-83-9 0.0100.00100.0025 0.0022
Carbon disulfideA 75-15-0 0.0100.00160.0050 0.0036
Carbon tetrachlorideA 56-23-5 0.00500.00120.0025 0.0018
ChlorobenzeneA 108-90-7 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0021
ChloroethaneA 75-00-3 0.0100.00100.0025 0.0022
ChloroformA 67-66-3 0.00500.00180.0025 0.0020
ChloromethaneA 74-87-3 0.0100.000900.0025 0.0022
cis-1,2-DichloroetheneA 156-59-2 0.00500.00150.0025 0.0022
cis-1,3-DichloropropeneA 10061-01-5 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0019
CyclohexaneA 110-82-7 0.00500.00120.0025 0.0019
DibromochloromethaneA 124-48-1 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0018
Page 7 of 8
Page 30 of 54
ALS Environmental Date:20-Nov-13
DichlorodifluoromethaneA 75-71-8 0.00500.00180.0025 0.0022
DichloromethaneA 75-09-2 0.0100.00140.0025 0.0015
EthylbenzeneA 100-41-4 0.00500.000900.0025 0.0020
IsopropylbenzeneA 98-82-8 0.00500.00100.0025 0.0018
m,p-XyleneA 179601-23-1 0.0100.00170.0050 0.0038
Methyl acetateA 79-20-9 0.00500.00100.0025 0.0023
Methyl tert-butyl etherA 1634-04-4 0.00500.00190.0025 0.0020
MethylcyclohexaneA 108-87-2 0.00500.00150.0025 0.0017
o-XyleneA 95-47-6 0.00500.00100.0025 0.0019
StyreneA 100-42-5 0.00500.000600.0025 0.0017
TetrachloroetheneA 127-18-4 0.00500.00100.0025 0.0022
TolueneA 108-88-3 0.00500.000700.0025 0.0019
trans-1,2-DichloroetheneA 156-60-5 0.00500.000900.0025 0.0020
trans-1,3-DichloropropeneA 10061-02-6 0.00500.000500.0025 0.0019
TrichloroetheneA 79-01-6 0.00500.00160.0025 0.0021
TrichlorofluoromethaneA 75-69-4 0.00500.000800.0025 0.0018
Vinyl chlorideA 75-01-4 0.00200.00100.0012 0.0010
Xylenes, TotalM 1330-20-7 0.0150.00260.0075 0.0057
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4S 17060-07-0 0000
Surr: 4-BromofluorobenzeneS 460-00-4 0000
Surr: DibromofluoromethaneS 1868-53-7 0000
Surr: Toluene-d8S 2037-26-5 0000
Page 8 of 8
Page 31 of 54
Date: 20-Nov-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74759 Instrument ID FID-12 Method:TX1005
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:36 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440405
MBLK
Run ID:FID-12_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FBLKS1-131118-74759
nC6 to nC12 U 2550
>nC12 to nC28 U 2550
>nC28 to nC35 U 2550
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon U 5050
0025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 113 70-13028.15 00
0025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 111 70-13027.64 00
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 01:09 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440406
LCS
Run ID:FID-12_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FLCSS1-131118-74759
0250nC6 to nC12 111 75-125276.8 2550
0250>nC12 to nC28 89.5 75-125223.6 2550
0025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl124 70-1303100
0025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene101 70-13025.34 00
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 01:41 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440407
LCSD
Run ID:FID-12_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FLCSDS1-131118-74759
276.80250nC6 to nC12 110 75-125 201.06273.9 2550
223.60250>nC12 to nC28 89.1 75-125 200.396222.8 2550
31025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl120 70-130 203.4429.95 00
25.34025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene99.9 70-130 201.4824.97 00
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:24 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T1-N SeqNo:3440409
MS
Run ID:FID-12_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311812-01BMS
4.418248.8nC6 to nC12 88.9 75-125225.5 2550
49.64248.8>nC12 to nC28 97 75-125290.9 2550
0024.88 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 122 70-13030.34 00
0024.88 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 96 70-13023.88 00
QC Page: 1 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 32 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74759 Instrument ID FID-12 Method:TX1005
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:57 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T1-N SeqNo:3440410
MSD
Run ID:FID-12_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311812-01BMSD
225.54.418248.3nC6 to nC12 114 75-125 2024.5 R288.4 2550
290.949.64248.3>nC12 to nC28 102 75-125 203.92302.5 2550
30.34024.83 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl128 70-130 204.7231.81 00
23.88024.83 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 111 70-130 2014.127.51 00
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-01B1311812-02B1311812-03B
1311812-04B1311812-05B1311812-06B
QC Page: 2 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 33 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74744 Instrument ID ICP7500 Method:SW6020
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 07:48 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440462
MBLK
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:MBLKS1-111813-74744
Arsenic U 0.250.500
Barium U 0.250.500
Cadmium U 0.10.500
Chromium U 0.250.500
Lead U 0.250.500
Nickel U 0.250.500
Selenium U 0.250.500
Silver U 0.250.500
Vanadium U 0.250.500
Zinc U 0.250.500
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:52 PM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440704
MBLK
Run ID:ICP7500_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:MBLKS1-111813-74744
Antimony U 0.250.500
Beryllium U 0.10.500
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 07:53 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440463
LCS
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:MLCSS1-111813-74744
010Arsenic 98.2 80-1209.822 0.250.500
010Barium 102 80-12010.21 0.250.500
010Cadmium 95 80-1209.505 0.10.500
010Chromium 101 80-12010.06 0.250.500
010Lead 95.7 80-1209.573 0.250.500
010Nickel 101 80-12010.06 0.250.500
010Selenium 99.6 80-1209.964 0.250.500
010Silver 102 80-12010.22 0.250.500
010Vanadium 102 80-12010.17 0.250.500
010Zinc 100 80-12010.05 0.250.500
QC Page: 3 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 34 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74744 Instrument ID ICP7500 Method:SW6020
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:57 PM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440705
LCS
Run ID:ICP7500_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:MLCSS1-111813-74744
010Antimony 96.9 80-1209.688 0.250.500
010Beryllium 92.4 80-1209.242 0.10.500
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 08:12 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440467
MS
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CMS
49.318.339Barium 156 75-125 SO62.31 0.250.417
0.059088.339Cadmium 87.1 75-1257.326 0.10.417
4.0378.339Lead 89.2 75-12511.47 0.250.417
0.0003098.339Silver 89.4 75-1257.452 0.250.417
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:13 PM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440852
MS
Run ID:ICPMS05_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CMS
0.10768.339Antimony 44.6 75-125 S3.827 0.250.417
1.9248.339Arsenic 88.2 75-1259.283 0.250.417
0.40258.339Beryllium 83.1 75-1257.336 0.10.417
7.0348.339Chromium 87.7 75-12514.35 0.250.417
6.4238.339Nickel 93.2 75-12514.19 0.250.417
0.36738.339Selenium 83.5 75-1257.329 0.250.417
11.778.339Vanadium 88.1 75-12519.12 0.250.417
13.638.339Zinc 90.4 75-12521.16 0.250.417
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 08:17 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440468
MSD
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CMSD
62.3149.317.601Barium 155 75-125 251.91 SO61.13 0.250.380
7.3260.059087.601Cadmium 88.2 75-125 258.046.76 0.10.380
11.474.0377.601Lead 91.8 75-125 254.0911.01 0.250.380
7.4520.0003097.601Silver 90.3 75-125 258.176.867 0.250.380
QC Page: 4 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 35 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74744 Instrument ID ICP7500 Method:SW6020
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:16 PM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440854
MSD
Run ID:ICPMS05_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CMSD
3.8270.10767.601Antimony 41.7 75-125 2515.5 S3.278 0.250.380
9.2831.9247.601Arsenic 90.3 75-125 255.528.785 0.250.380
7.3360.40257.601Beryllium 86.4 75-125 255.146.969 0.10.380
14.357.0347.601Chromium 94.3 75-125 250.99914.2 0.250.380
14.196.4237.601Nickel 95.8 75-125 253.4913.71 0.250.380
7.3290.36737.601Selenium 83.9 75-125 258.296.746 0.250.380
19.1211.777.601Vanadium 92.8 75-125 251.5618.82 0.250.380
21.1613.637.601Zinc 93 75-125 252.2320.7 0.250.380
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 08:03 AM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440465
DUP
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CDUP
49.31Barium 250.97448.83 0.250.402
0.05908Cadmium 250 J0.06178 0.10.402
4.037Lead 251.873.962 0.250.402
0.000309Silver 250U0.250.402
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:11 PM
Prep Date:11/18/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440851
DUP
Run ID:ICPMS05_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CDUP
0.1076Antimony 250U0.250.402
1.924Arsenic 250.8581.941 0.250.402
0.4025Beryllium 250 J0.3959 0.10.402
7.034Chromium 250.7696.98 0.250.402
6.423Nickel 251.726.313 0.250.402
0.3673Selenium 250 J0.3911 0.250.402
11.77Vanadium 252.4811.48 0.250.402
13.63Zinc 252.9513.23 0.250.402
QC Page: 5 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 36 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74744 Instrument ID ICP7500 Method:SW6020
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 08:22 AM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440469
PDS
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CBS
49.318.001Barium 111 75-125 O58.23 0.250.400
0.059088.001Cadmium 97.4 75-1257.856 0.10.400
4.0378.001Lead 98.1 75-12511.89 0.250.400
0.0003098.001Silver 102 75-1258.177 0.250.400
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:18 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440857
PDS
Run ID:ICPMS05_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311609-01CBS
0.10768.001Antimony 106 75-1258.626 0.250.400
1.9248.001Arsenic 101 75-12510.02 0.250.400
0.40258.001Beryllium 94.1 75-1257.931 0.10.400
7.0348.001Chromium 95.5 75-12514.68 0.250.400
6.4238.001Nickel 96.5 75-12514.14 0.250.400
0.36738.001Selenium 101 75-1258.453 0.250.400
11.778.001Vanadium 94.4 75-12519.32 0.250.400
13.638.001Zinc 84.3 75-12520.37 0.250.400
Qual
%D Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 08:07 AM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult%REC%D
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440466
SD
Run ID:ICP7500_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:5
Sample ID:1311609-01C DIL SX
49.31Barium 100.1349.25 0.252.00
0.05908Cadmium 100U0.12.00
4.037Lead 101.984.117 0.252.00
0.000309Silver 100U0.252.00
QC Page: 6 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 37 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74744 Instrument ID ICP7500 Method:SW6020
Qual
%D
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 04:20 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %D
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440860
SD
Run ID:ICPMS05_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:5
Sample ID:1311609-01C DIL SX
0.1076Antimony 100U0.252.00
1.924Arsenic 1002.104 0.252.00
0.4025Beryllium 100 J0.7 0.12.00
7.034Chromium 102.747.226 0.252.00
6.423Nickel 106.036.81 0.252.00
0.3673Selenium 100U0.252.00
11.77Vanadium 100.72711.85 0.252.00
13.63Zinc 103.0314.04 0.252.00
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-05C1311812-06C
QC Page: 7 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 38 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74754 Instrument ID HG02 Method:SW7471A
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:40 PM
Prep Date:11/19/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3441085
MBLK
Run ID:HG02_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:GBLKS1-111913-74754
Mercury U 1.663.32
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:42 PM
Prep Date:11/19/2013
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3441086
LCS
Run ID:HG02_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:GLCSS1-111913-74754
0333.3Mercury 94.2 85-1153141.663.32
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:48 PM
Prep Date:11/19/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3441089
MS
Run ID:HG02_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311693-01CMS
-1.648342.2Mercury 96.9 85-115329.9 1.663.41
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:50 PM
Prep Date:11/19/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3441090
MSD
Run ID:HG02_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311693-01CMSD
329.9-1.648341.5Mercury 92.1 85-115 205.33312.8 1.663.41
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/19/2013 02:46 PM
Prep Date:11/19/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3441088
DUP
Run ID:HG02_131119A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311693-01CDUP
-1.648Mercury 200U1.663.42
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-05C1311812-06C
QC Page: 8 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 39 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157303 Instrument ID VOA3 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 09:27 AM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438084
MBLK
Run ID:VOA3_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:50
Sample ID:VBLKM1-111813-R157303
Benzene U 1.2250
Ethylbenzene U 1.2250
m,p-Xylene U 2.5500
o-Xylene U 1.2250
Toluene U 1.2250
Xylenes, Total U 3.8500
002500 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d487.8 70-128219500
002500 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 85.3 73-126213300
002500 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 95 71-128237500
002500 Surr: Toluene-d8 95.7 73-127239300
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 08:05 AM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/L
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438083
LCS
Run ID:VOA3_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:VLCSW1-111813-R157303
050Benzene 111 73-12155.72 05.0
050Ethylbenzene 111 80-12055.62 05.0
0100m,p-Xylene 112 78-121112.2 010
050o-Xylene 111 80-12055.64 05.0
050Toluene 106 80-12053.2 05.0
0150Xylenes, Total 112 80-120167.9 015
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d484.2 70-12542.1 05.0
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene88.6 72-12544.3 05.0
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 90.8 71-12545.38 05.0
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 94.4 75-12547.22 05.0
QC Page: 9 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 40 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157303 Instrument ID VOA3 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:12 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438770
MS
Run ID:VOA3_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:100
Sample ID:1311627-02AMS
05000Benzene 92.6 79-12046281.2500
05000Ethylbenzene 102 80-12250791.2500
010000m,p-Xylene 109 79-122108702.51,000
05000o-Xylene 97.2 80-12348591.2500
05000Toluene 89.8 79-12044901.2500
015000Xylenes, Total 105 80-120157203.81,000
005000 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d481.6 70-128407900
005000 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 87.4 73-126436900
005000 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 89 71-128445200
005000 Surr: Toluene-d8 94.2 73-127471100
Qual
RPD Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:40 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438771
MSD
Run ID:VOA3_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:100
Sample ID:1311627-02AMSD
462805000Benzene104 79-120 301252171.2500
507905000Ethylbenzene107 80-122 305.2553531.2500
10870010000m,p-Xylene 112 79-122 303.22112202.51,000
485905000o-Xylene 107 80-123 309.4853421.2500
449005000Toluene100 79-120 3010.850001.2500
15720015000Xylenes, Total 110 79-123 305.2165603.81,000
407905000 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d481 70-128 300.693405100
436905000 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene90.2 73-126 303.2451000
445205000 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 90.8 71-128 301.91453800
471105000 Surr: Toluene-d8 93 73-127 301.32465000
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-02A1311812-05A1311812-06A
QC Page: 10 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 41 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 09:17 AM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438572
MBLK
Run ID:VOA5_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:VBLKS1-111813-R157325
1,1,1-Trichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1-Dichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dibromoethane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichloropropane U 2.55.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
2-Butanone U 510
2-Hexanone U 510
4-Methyl-2-pentanone U 510
Acetone U 520
Benzene U 2.55.0
Bromodichloromethane U 2.55.0
Bromoform U 2.55.0
Bromomethane U 2.510
Carbon disulfide U 510
Carbon tetrachloride U 2.55.0
Chlorobenzene U 2.55.0
Chloroethane U 2.510
Chloroform U 2.55.0
Chloromethane U 2.510
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene U 2.55.0
Cyclohexane U 2.55.0
Dibromochloromethane U 2.55.0
Dichlorodifluoromethane U 2.55.0
Dichloromethane U 2.510
Ethylbenzene U 2.55.0
Isopropylbenzene U 2.55.0
m,p-Xylene U 510
Methyl acetate U 2.55.0
QC Page: 11 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 42 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Methyl tert-butyl ether U 2.55.0
Methylcyclohexane U 2.55.0
o-Xylene U 2.55.0
Styrene U 2.55.0
Tetrachloroethene U 2.55.0
Toluene U 2.55.0
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene U 2.55.0
Trichloroethene U 2.55.0
Trichlorofluoromethane U 2.55.0
Vinyl chloride U 1.22.0
Xylenes, Total U 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.7 70-12847.85 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 73-12649.02 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane99.6 71-12849.81 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 98.6 73-12749.32 00
QC Page: 12 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 43 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 08:31 AM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3438571
LCS
Run ID:VOA5_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:VLCSS1-111813-R157325
0501,1,1-Trichloroethane 105 79-12452.37 2.55.0
0501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane94.2 75-12347.08 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 105 79-12552.29 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichloroethane 92.9 79-12046.43 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethane 103 75-12451.53 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethene 106 80-12253.22 2.55.0
0501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 98 74-12848.98 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane94.4 66-12947.22 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromoethane 95.9 70-12047.94 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichlorobenzene 96.2 75-12048.08 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloroethane 96.8 73-12148.42 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloropropane 95.2 76-12047.62 2.55.0
0501,3-Dichlorobenzene 96.7 70-12548.37 2.55.0
0501,4-Dichlorobenzene 96.9 77-12048.47 2.55.0
01002-Butanone 93.2 65-13093.22 510
01002-Hexanone 96.6 65-13396.57 510
01004-Methyl-2-pentanone 93.2 69-13093.18 510
0100Acetone 97 53-14297.04 520
050Benzene 99.7 79-12049.84 2.55.0
050Bromodichloromethane 98.8 79-12149.4 2.55.0
050Bromoform 92.7 74-12246.33 2.55.0
050Bromomethane 101 68-13150.7 2.510
0100Carbon disulfide 110 80-124109.9 510
050Carbon tetrachloride 102 74-12651.2 2.55.0
050Chlorobenzene 99.1 79-12049.57 2.55.0
050Chloroethane 105 76-12652.74 2.510
050Chloroform 103 78-12051.35 2.55.0
050Chloromethane 105 69-12952.37 2.510
050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 103 80-12051.48 2.55.0
050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 98.9 77-12349.45 2.55.0
050Cyclohexane 106 74-12652.78 2.55.0
050Dibromochloromethane97.2 78-12248.62 2.55.0
050Dichlorodifluoromethane97.4 57-14048.68 2.55.0
050Dichloromethane 94.2 62-13047.11 2.510
050Ethylbenzene 99.1 80-12249.57 2.55.0
050Isopropylbenzene 101 72-12750.66 2.55.0
0100m,p-Xylene 101 79-122101.1 510
050Methyl acetate 85.4 69-12342.69 2.55.0
QC Page: 13 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 44 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
050Methyl tert-butyl ether 98.7 76-12149.37 2.55.0
050Methylcyclohexane 103 77-12651.69 2.55.0
050o-Xylene 98.1 80-12349.04 2.55.0
050Styrene 99.6 78-12449.8 2.55.0
050Tetrachloroethene 83.1 73-12941.57 2.55.0
050Toluene 100 79-12050.13 2.55.0
050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 106 79-12252.79 2.55.0
050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene98.2 77-12049.11 2.55.0
050Trichloroethene 97.2 80-12148.59 2.55.0
050Trichlorofluoromethane 109 75-12654.64 2.55.0
050Vinyl chloride 107 76-12653.66 1.22.0
0150Xylenes, Total 100 80-120150.1 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98.7 70-12849.34 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 73-12650.03 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane101 71-12850.61 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 99.2 73-12749.58 00
QC Page: 14 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 45 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:23 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T2-S SeqNo:3438589
MS
Run ID:VOA5_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311812-03AMS
0501,1,1-Trichloroethane 95.9 79-12447.97 2.55.0
0501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane84.3 75-12342.17 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 95.5 79-12547.76 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichloroethane 85.7 79-12042.86 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethane 95.2 75-12447.62 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethene 98 80-12248.98 2.55.0
0501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 78.5 74-12839.24 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane71.6 66-12935.78 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromoethane 86.4 70-12043.18 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichlorobenzene 80.6 75-12040.32 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloroethane 85.6 73-12142.82 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloropropane 88.8 76-12044.39 2.55.0
0501,3-Dichlorobenzene 81.9 70-12540.95 2.55.0
0501,4-Dichlorobenzene 80.9 77-12040.47 2.55.0
01002-Butanone 101 65-130101.1 510
01002-Hexanone 82.8 65-13382.8 510
01004-Methyl-2-pentanone 90.1 69-13090.07 510
102.9100Acetone 374 53-142 SE477.3 520
050Benzene 92.8 79-12046.4 2.55.0
050Bromodichloromethane 87.1 79-12143.53 2.55.0
050Bromoform 80.5 74-12240.26 2.55.0
050Bromomethane 96.9 68-13148.43 2.510
0100Carbon disulfide 95.1 80-12495.13 510
050Carbon tetrachloride 92.4 74-12646.19 2.55.0
050Chlorobenzene 87.8 79-12043.91 2.55.0
050Chloroethane 94.7 76-12647.36 2.510
050Chloroform 93.6 78-12046.8 2.55.0
050Chloromethane 92.8 69-12946.38 2.510
050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 90.7 80-12045.34 2.55.0
050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 88.3 77-12344.16 2.55.0
050Cyclohexane 97.4 74-12648.72 2.55.0
050Dibromochloromethane83.3 78-12241.63 2.55.0
050Dichlorodifluoromethane 90 57-140452.55.0
050Dichloromethane 83.5 62-13041.75 2.510
050Ethylbenzene 90.5 80-12245.25 2.55.0
050Isopropylbenzene 90.7 72-12745.33 2.55.0
0100m,p-Xylene 90.8 79-12290.81 510
050Methyl acetate 86 69-12343.02 2.55.0
QC Page: 15 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 46 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
0.933750Methyl tert-butyl ether 89.9 76-12145.88 2.55.0
050Methylcyclohexane 100 77-12650.13 2.55.0
0.588350o-Xylene 89 80-12345.11 2.55.0
050Styrene 87.5 78-12443.77 2.55.0
050Tetrachloroethene 115 73-12957.66 2.55.0
050Toluene 92.2 79-12046.08 2.55.0
050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 93.3 79-12246.64 2.55.0
050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene86.3 77-12043.13 2.55.0
050Trichloroethene 102 80-12150.92 2.55.0
050Trichlorofluoromethane 97.4 75-12648.69 2.55.0
050Vinyl chloride 101 76-12650.59 1.22.0
0150Xylenes, Total 90.6 80-120135.9 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.9 70-12847.96 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 73-12650.52 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane97.9 71-12848.96 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 98 73-12748.99 00
QC Page: 16 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 47 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:47 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T2-S SeqNo:3438590
MSD
Run ID:VOA5_131118A
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311812-03AMSD
47.970501,1,1-Trichloroethane 101 79-124 305.3150.59 2.55.0
42.170501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane80.7 75-123 304.4740.33 2.55.0
47.760501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 103 79-125 307.7151.59 2.55.0
42.860501,1,2-Trichloroethane 90.5 79-120 305.3945.23 2.55.0
47.620501,1-Dichloroethane 99.6 75-124 304.4549.79 2.55.0
48.980501,1-Dichloroethene 103 80-122 305.251.59 2.55.0
39.240501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 90.4 74-128 3014.145.21 2.55.0
35.780501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane82.5 66-129 3014.341.27 2.55.0
43.180501,2-Dibromoethane 89 70-120 303.0144.5 2.55.0
40.320501,2-Dichlorobenzene 86.7 75-120 307.343.37 2.55.0
42.820501,2-Dichloroethane 96 73-121 3011.447.98 2.55.0
44.390501,2-Dichloropropane 94.3 76-120 305.9947.13 2.55.0
40.950501,3-Dichlorobenzene 89 70-125 308.2844.49 2.55.0
40.470501,4-Dichlorobenzene 89.1 77-120 309.6444.57 2.55.0
101.101002-Butanone 99.5 65-130 301.699.48 510
82.801002-Hexanone 86.2 65-133 304.0486.21 510
90.0701004-Methyl-2-pentanone 93.8 69-130 304.193.84 510
477.3102.9100Acetone 425 53-142 3010SE527.7 520
46.4050Benzene99.7 79-120 307.1949.86 2.55.0
43.53050Bromodichloromethane95.9 79-121 309.6547.94 2.55.0
40.26050Bromoform84.1 74-122 304.3142.04 2.55.0
48.43050Bromomethane97.5 68-131 300.70748.77 2.510
95.130100Carbon disulfide 102 80-124 306.53101.5 510
46.19050Carbon tetrachloride 101 74-126 309.2550.67 2.55.0
43.91050Chlorobenzene92.6 79-120 305.2746.28 2.55.0
47.36050Chloroethane103 76-126 307.9651.28 2.510
46.8050Chloroform100 78-120 306.7750.09 2.55.0
46.38050Chloromethane103 69-129 3010.251.38 2.510
45.34050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 97.3 80-120 307.0148.63 2.55.0
44.16050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 95.2 77-123 307.5347.61 2.55.0
48.72050Cyclohexane107 74-126 309.0653.34 2.55.0
41.63050Dibromochloromethane91 78-122 308.8645.48 2.55.0
45050Dichlorodifluoromethane95.3 57-140 305.7147.65 2.55.0
41.75050Dichloromethane90.3 62-130 307.8745.17 2.510
45.25050Ethylbenzene96.4 80-122 306.2948.18 2.55.0
45.33050Isopropylbenzene98.3 72-127 308.0749.14 2.55.0
90.810100m,p-Xylene 96.6 79-122 306.1596.57 510
43.02050Methyl acetate 79.5 69-123 307.9239.74 2.55.0
QC Page: 17 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 48 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157325 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
45.880.933750Methyl tert-butyl ether 97.2 76-121 307.6249.52 2.55.0
50.13050Methylcyclohexane113 77-126 3011.756.38 2.55.0
45.110.588350o-Xylene 93.3 80-123 304.6447.25 2.55.0
43.77050Styrene93.7 78-124 306.7946.84 2.55.0
57.66050Tetrachloroethene126 73-129 309.0463.12 2.55.0
46.08050Toluene96.3 79-120 304.4548.17 2.55.0
46.64050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 101 79-122 307.650.32 2.55.0
43.13050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene91.8 77-120 306.2745.92 2.55.0
50.92050Trichloroethene114 80-121 3011.457.09 2.55.0
48.69050Trichlorofluoromethane103 75-126 305.5251.45 2.55.0
50.59050Vinyl chloride 105 76-126 303.2852.27 1.22.0
135.90150Xylenes, Total 95.9 79-123 305.65143.8 7.510
47.96050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94.6 70-128 301.3847.3 00
50.52050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 111 73-126 309.8355.75 00
48.96050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane98.3 71-128 300.37449.14 00
48.99050 Surr: Toluene-d8 95.3 73-127 302.7747.65 00
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-01A1311812-02A1311812-03A
1311812-04A1311812-05A1311812-06A
QC Page: 18 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 49 of 54
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:1311812
QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157388 Instrument ID Balance1 Method:SW3550(Dissolve)
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:30 PM
Prep Date:
Analyte Result %REC %RPD
Units:wt%
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440133
DUP
Run ID:BALANCE1_131118D
SPK Val
SPK Ref Value RPD Ref ValueControl Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311819-01ADUP
17.75Percent Moisture 200.74517.62 00.0100
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:1311812-01C1311812-02C1311812-03C
1311812-04C1311812-05C1311812-06C
QC Page: 19 of 19
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 50 of 54
ALS Environmental Date: 20-Nov-13
QUALIFIERS,
ACRONYMS, UNITSProject:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
WorkOrder:1311812
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Milligrams per Kilogram - Dry weight correctedmg/Kg-dry
wt%
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*
Not accrediteda
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitB
Value above quantitation rangeE
Analyzed outside of Holding TimeH
Analyte detected below quantitation limitJ
Manually integrated, see raw data for justificationM
Not offered for accreditationn
Not Detected at the Reporting LimitND
Sample amount is > 4 times amount spikedO
Dual Column results percent difference > 40%P
RPD above laboratory control limitR
Spike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsS
Analyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
Page 51 of 54
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name:EFFECTIVE ENV-HOU
Work Order: 1311812
Date/Time Received:15-Nov-13 16:22
Received by:JBA
Checklist completed by
eSignature Date
Reviewed by:
DateeSignature
Matrices:soil/water
Carrier name:Client
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present?Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle?Yes No
Sample containers intact?Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?Yes No
All samples received within holding time?Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance?Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s):3.7 C/3.7 C u/c
Login Notes:Trip Blanks logged in w/out test codes
IR 1
Cooler(s)/Kit(s):3967
15-Nov-13 16-Nov-13 Johnnie B. Allen Kristin M Brown
pH adjusted?Yes No N/A
pH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:11/15/13 18:20
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted:Date Contacted:Person Contacted:
Contacted By:Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 1
Page 52 of 54
Page 53 of 54
Page 54 of 54
19-Dec-2013
Effective Environmental Inc.
Bruce MacDonald
Dear Bruce,
Re:City of LaPorte UST Work Order:13111010
Fax:(713) 672-6101Tel:(713) 672-6100
9950 Chemical Road
Pasadena, TX 77507
ALS Environmental received 1 sample on 15-Nov-2013 04:22 PM for the analyses presented in the
following report.
Project Manager
Kristin M Brown
Electronically approved by: Kristin M Brown
Certificate No: TX: T104704231-13-12
This is a REVISED REPORT. Please see the Case Narrative for discussion concerning this revision.
The total number of pages in this revised report is 20.
Regards,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887
ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page 1 of 20
19-Dec-13Date:ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
This data package consists of all or some of the following as applicable:
This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data:
R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;
R2 Sample identification cross-reference;
R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes:
a) Items consistent with NELAC Chapter 5,
b) dilution factors,
c) preparation methods,
d) cleanup methods, and
e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs).
R4 Surrogate recovery data including:
a) Calculated recovery (%R), and
b) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.
R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;
R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:
a) LCS spiking amounts,
b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and
c)The laboratory’s LCS QC limits.
R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:
a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,
b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,
c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,
d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and
e) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits.
R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision:
a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,
b) the calculated RPD, and
c) the laboratory’s QC limits for analytical duplicates.
R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) and detectability check sample results for each
analyte for each method and matrix.
R10 Other problems or anomalies.
The Exception Report for each “No” or “Not Reviewed (NR)” item in Laboratory Review
Checklist and for each analyte, matrix, and method for which the laboratory does not hold
NELAC accreditation under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Page 2 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This laboratory is NELAC
accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for all the methods, analytes and matrices reported in
this data package except as noted in the Exception Reports. The data have been reviewed and are technically
compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached
exception reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed
by the laboratory have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information
affecting the quality of the data has been knowingly withheld.
Check, if applicable: [NA] This laboratory meets an exception under 30 TAC §25.6 and was last inspected by [ ]
TCEQ or [ ] ______________ on (enter date of last inspection). Any findings affecting the data in this laboratory
data package are noted in the Exception Reports herein. The official signing the cover page of the report in which
these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release
statement is true.
Kristin M Brown
Kristin M Brown
Project Manager
Page 3 of 20
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/22/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111010
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74843, R157388
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
R1 OI Chain-of-custody (C-O-C)
Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability
upon receipt? X
Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? X
R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification
Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? X
Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? X
R3 OI Test reports
Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? X
Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by
calibration standards? X
Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were sample detection limits reported for all analytes not detected? X
Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X
Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? X
Were bulk soils/solids samples for volatile analysis extracted with methanol per
SW-846 Method 5035? X
If required for the project, TICs reported? X
R4 O Surrogate recovery data
Were surrogates added prior to extraction? X
Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC
limits? X
R5 OI Test reports/summary forms for blank samples
Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? X
Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including
preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? X
Were blank concentrations < MQL? X
R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS):
Were all COCs included in the LCS? X
Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and
cleanup steps? X
Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X
Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X
Does the detectability data document the laboratory’s capability to detect the
COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SDLs? X
Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? X
R7 OI Matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) data
Were the project/method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? X
Were MS/MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X
Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? X
R8 OI Analytical duplicate data
Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? X
Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? X
R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs):
Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? X
Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration
standard? X
Are unadjusted MQLs and DCSs included in the laboratory data package? X
R10 OI Other problems/anomalies
Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and
ER? X
Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X
Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SDL and minimize
the matrix interference affects on the sample results? X
Is the laboratory NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Program for
the analytes, matrices and methods associated with this laboratory data package? X
Page 4 of 20
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/22/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111010
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74843, R157388
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
S1 OI Initial calibration (ICAL)
Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC
limits? X
Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X
Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? X
Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to
calculate the curve? X
Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? X
Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source
standard? X
S2 OI
Initial and continuing calibration verification (ICCV and CCV) and
continuing calibration blank (CCB)
Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? X
Were percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? X
Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X
Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL? X
S3 O Mass spectral tuning:
Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? X
Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC limits? X
S4 O Internal standards (IS):
Were IS area counts and retention times within the method-required QC limits? X
S5 OI
Raw data (NELAC section 1 appendix A glossary, and section 5.12 or ISO/IEC
17025 section
Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an
analyst? X
Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X
S6 O Dual column confirmation
Did dual column confirmation results meet the method-required QC? X
S7 O Tentatively identified compounds (TICs):
If TICs were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate
checks? X
S8 I Interference Check Sample (ICS) results:
Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? X
S9 I Serial dilutions, post digestion spikes, and method of standard additions
Were percent differences, recoveries, and the linearity within the QC limits
specified in the method? X
S10 OI Method detection limit (MDL) studies
Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? X
Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs? X
S11 OI Proficiency test reports:
Was the laboratory's performance acceptable on the applicable proficiency tests or
evaluation studies? X
S12 OI Standards documentation
Are all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other
appropriate sources? X
S13 OI Compound/analyte identification procedures
Are the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? X
S14 OI Demonstration of analyst competency (DOC)
Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? X
Is documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? X
S15 OI
Verification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or
ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5)
Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated,
where applicable? X
S16 OI Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):
Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be
retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period.
O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable);
NA = Not Applicable;
NR = Not Reviewed;
R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 5 of 20
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/22/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111010
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74843, R157388
ER#5 Description
No Exceptions.
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be
retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period.
O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable);
NA = Not Applicable;
NR = Not Reviewed;
R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 6 of 20
Date: 19-Dec-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 Case Narrative
Report was revised 12/19/13 to report Dibenzofuran at the request of the client.
CN Page 1 of 1
Page 7 of 20
Date: 19-Dec-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold
13111010-01T2-N 1311812-04Soil 11/15/2013 14:22 11/15/2013 16:22
SS Page 1 of 1
Page 8 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T2-N
Collection Date:11/15/2013 02:22 PM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:13111010-01
ALS Environmental Date:19-Dec-13
SDL
LOW-LEVEL SEMIVOLATILES SW8270 Analyst:LGPrep: SW3541 / 11/21/13Method:
Acenaphthene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00098
Acenaphthylene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
Anthracene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
Benz(a)anthracene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
Benzo(a)pyrene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00073
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00086
Chrysene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00073
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Dibenzofuran 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Fluoranthene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00098
Fluorene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry 10.020 0.0016
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
Naphthalene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00098
Phenanthrene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry 10.0089 0.00086
Pyrene 11/21/2013 18:450.0081mg/Kg-dry1U0.00073
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/21/2013 18:4543-125%REC 163.2
Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14 11/21/2013 18:4532-125%REC 180.3
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 11/21/2013 18:4537-125%REC 159.0
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/18/2013 12:300.0100wt%118.6 0.010
AR Page 1 of 1
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 9 of 20
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
C
l
i
e
n
t
S
a
m
p
l
e
I
D
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
Ma
t
r
i
x
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
D
a
t
e
DATES REPORT19-Dec-13
Wo
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
:
13
1
1
1
0
1
0
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
n
c
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
a
P
o
r
t
e
U
S
T
AL
S
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Pr
e
p
D
a
t
e
TC
L
P
D
a
t
e
74
8
4
3
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Lo
w
-
L
e
v
e
l
S
e
m
i
v
o
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
13
1
1
1
0
1
0
-
0
1
A
T2
-
N
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
2
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
3
0
6
:
4
5
P
M
11
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
3
0
7
:
3
0
A
M
R1
5
7
3
8
8
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Mo
i
s
t
u
r
e
13
1
1
1
0
1
0
-
0
1
A
T2
-
N
11
/
1
5
/
2
0
1
3
2
:
2
2
:
0
0
P
M
So
i
l
11
/
1
8
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
3
0
P
M
2Page:
Pa
g
e
10
of
20
ALS Environmental Date:19-Dec-13
Test Name:Moisture
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:MOIST_SW3550
Test Number:SW3550
Units:wt%Matrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:13111010
DCS
InstrumentID:Balance1
DCS
Spike
Percent MoistureA MOIST 0.0100.01000
Page 1 of 2
Page 11 of 20
ALS Environmental Date:19-Dec-13
Test Name:Low-Level Semivolatiles
Analyte MDL
Unadjusted
MQL
Test Code:8270_LOW_S
Test Number:SW8270
Units:µg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:13111010
DCS
InstrumentID:SV-4
DCS
Spike
AcenaphtheneA 83-32-9 6.60.803.3 2.9
AcenaphthyleneA 208-96-8 6.60.703.3 2.8
AnthraceneA 120-12-7 6.61.23.3 2.9
Benz(a)anthraceneA 56-55-3 6.60.903.3 2.6
Benzo(a)pyreneA 50-32-8 6.60.603.3 2.8
Benzo(b)fluorantheneA 205-99-2 6.60.703.3 2.2
Benzo(g,h,i)peryleneA 191-24-2 6.60.703.3 3.5
Benzo(k)fluorantheneA 207-08-9 6.60.703.3 3.6
ChryseneA 218-01-9 6.60.603.3 3.5
Dibenz(a,h)anthraceneA 53-70-3 6.61.03.3 2.7
DibenzofuranA 132-64-9 6.61.03.3 3.2
FluorantheneA 206-44-0 6.60.803.3 2.9
FluoreneA 86-73-7 6.61.33.3 3.1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneA 193-39-5 6.60.903.3 2.3
NaphthaleneA 91-20-3 6.60.803.3 3.2
PhenanthreneA 85-01-8 6.60.703.3 3.2
PyreneA 129-00-0 6.60.603.3 3.0
Surr: 2-FluorobiphenylS 321-60-8 6.6000
Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14S 1718-51-0 6.6000
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5S 4165-60-0 6.6000
Page 2 of 2
Page 12 of 20
Date: 19-Dec-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74843 Instrument ID SV-4 Method:SW8270
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/21/2013 03:41 PM
Prep Date:11/21/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3444680
MBLK
Run ID:SV-4_131121A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:SBLKS11-131121-74843
Acenaphthene U 3.36.6
Acenaphthylene U 3.36.6
Anthracene U 3.36.6
Benz(a)anthracene U 3.36.6
Benzo(a)pyrene U 3.36.6
Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 3.36.6
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 3.36.6
Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 3.36.6
Chrysene U 3.36.6
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 3.36.6
Dibenzofuran U 3.36.6
Fluoranthene U 3.36.6
Fluorene U 3.36.6
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 3.36.6
Naphthalene U 3.36.6
Phenanthrene U 3.36.6
Pyrene U 3.36.6
00166.7 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 77.9 43-125129.9 06.6
00166.7 Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14 83.3 32-125138.9 06.6
00166.7 Surr: Nitrobenzene-d572.7 37-125121.2 06.6
QC Page: 1 of 7
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 13 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74843 Instrument ID SV-4 Method:SW8270
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/21/2013 04:02 PM
Prep Date:11/21/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3444681
LCS
Run ID:SV-4_131121A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:SLCSS1-131121-74843
0166.7Acenaphthene 71.8 50-120119.6 3.36.6
0166.7Acenaphthylene 75.3 50-120125.5 3.36.6
0166.7Anthracene 78.1 50-123130.1 3.36.6
0166.7Benz(a)anthracene 85.5 50-131142.5 3.36.6
0166.7Benzo(a)pyrene 78.7 50-130131.2 3.36.6
0166.7Benzo(b)fluoranthene 85.5 50-137142.5 3.36.6
0166.7Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 74.4 50-1301243.36.6
0166.7Benzo(k)fluoranthene 80.4 50-1431343.36.6
0166.7Chrysene 82.8 50-1301383.36.6
0166.7Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 78.9 50-130131.5 3.36.6
0166.7Dibenzofuran 78 50-125130.1 3.36.6
0166.7Fluoranthene 79.9 50-131133.2 3.36.6
0166.7Fluorene 74.1 50-125123.6 3.36.6
0166.7Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 79.7 45-139132.8 3.36.6
0166.7Naphthalene 77.3 50-125128.9 3.36.6
0166.7Phenanthrene 77.6 50-125129.4 3.36.6
0166.7Pyrene 84.2 45-130140.3 3.36.6
00166.7 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 78 43-12513006.6
00166.7 Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14 81.3 32-125135.4 06.6
00166.7 Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 72.2 37-125120.3 06.6
QC Page: 2 of 7
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 14 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74843 Instrument ID SV-4 Method:SW8270
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/21/2013 07:06 PM
Prep Date:11/21/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T2-N SeqNo:3444685
MS
Run ID:SV-4_131121A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:13111010-01AMS
0166.3Acenaphthene 68.6 50-1201143.36.6
0166.3Acenaphthylene 75.1 50-120124.9 3.36.6
0166.3Anthracene 81.1 50-123134.9 3.36.6
0166.3Benz(a)anthracene 82.1 50-131136.5 3.36.6
0166.3Benzo(a)pyrene 77.5 50-130128.8 3.36.6
0166.3Benzo(b)fluoranthene 82.8 50-137137.7 3.36.6
0166.3Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 80.4 50-130133.7 3.36.6
0166.3Benzo(k)fluoranthene 73.7 50-143122.6 3.36.6
0166.3Chrysene 80.9 50-130134.5 3.36.6
0166.3Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 85.9 50-130142.9 3.36.6
0166.3Dibenzofuran 80.9 50-125134.5 3.36.6
0166.3Fluoranthene 82.7 50-131137.6 3.36.6
16.48166.3Fluorene 76.8 50-125144.2 3.36.6
0166.3Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 82.1 45-139136.5 3.36.6
0166.3Naphthalene 65.7 50-125109.2 3.36.6
7.243166.3Phenanthrene 75 50-125131.9 3.36.6
0166.3Pyrene 81.7 45-130135.8 3.36.6
00166.3 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl70.5 43-125117.3 06.6
00166.3 Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14 82.3 32-125136.9 06.6
00166.3 Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 59.7 37-12599.34 06.6
QC Page: 3 of 7
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 15 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74843 Instrument ID SV-4 Method:SW8270
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/21/2013 07:26 PM
Prep Date:11/21/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:T2-N SeqNo:3444686
MSD
Run ID:SV-4_131121A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:13111010-01AMSD
1140166.1Acenaphthene 60.1 50-120 3013.299.88 3.36.6
124.90166.1Acenaphthylene 67.5 50-120 3010.8112.1 3.36.6
134.90166.1Anthracene 82.1 50-123 301.08136.3 3.36.6
136.50166.1Benz(a)anthracene 87.7 50-131 306.51145.7 3.36.6
128.80166.1Benzo(a)pyrene 87.2 50-130 3011.7144.9 3.36.6
137.70166.1Benzo(b)fluoranthene 89 50-137 307.05147.8 3.36.6
133.70166.1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 84.7 50-130 305.15140.7 3.36.6
122.60166.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene 91.1 50-143 3021151.3 3.36.6
134.50166.1Chrysene 90 50-130 3010.6149.5 3.36.6
142.90166.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 89.8 50-130 304.28149.1 3.36.6
134.50166.1Dibenzofuran 74 50-125 309.01122.9 3.36.6
137.60166.1Fluoranthene 82.7 50-131 300.171137.3 3.36.6
144.216.48166.1Fluorene 67.3 50-125 3011.7128.3 3.36.6
136.50166.1Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 88 45-139 306.79146.1 3.36.6
109.20166.1Naphthalene 66.6 50-125 301.34110.6 3.36.6
131.97.243166.1Phenanthrene 77.6 50-125 303.21136.2 3.36.6
135.80166.1Pyrene 84.5 45-130 303.27140.3 3.36.6
117.30166.1 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 65.9 43-125 306.89109.5 06.6
136.90166.1 Surr: 4-Terphenyl-d14 89.7 32-125 308.4414906.6
99.340166.1 Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5 63 37-125 305.13104.6 06.6
QC Page: 5 of 7
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 16 of 20
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111010 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157388 Instrument ID Balance1 Method:SW3550(Dissolve)
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/18/2013 12:30 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:wt%
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3440133
DUP
Run ID:BALANCE1_131118D
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311819-01ADUP
17.75Percent Moisture 200.74517.62 00.0100
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:13111010-
01A
QC Page: 7 of 7
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 17 of 20
ALS Environmental Date: 19-Dec-13
QUALIFIERS,
ACRONYMS, UNITSProject:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
WorkOrder:13111010
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Micrograms per Kilogram - Dry weight correctedµg/Kg-dry
wt%
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*
Not accrediteda
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitB
Value above quantitation rangeE
Analyzed outside of Holding TimeH
Analyte detected below quantitation limitJ
Manually integrated, see raw data for justificationM
Not offered for accreditationn
Not Detected at the Reporting LimitND
Sample amount is > 4 times amount spikedO
Dual Column results percent difference > 40%P
RPD above laboratory control limitR
Spike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsS
Analyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
Page 18 of 20
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name:EEFFECTIVE ENV-HOU
Work Order: 11311812
Date/Time Received:115-Nov-13 16:22
Received by:JJBA
Checklist completed by
eSignature Date
Reviewed by:
DateeSignature
Matrices:soil/water
Carrier name:Client
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present?Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle?Yes No
Sample containers intact?Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?Yes No
All samples received within holding time?Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance?Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s):3.7 C/3.7 C u/c
Login Notes:Trip Blanks logged in w/out test codes
IR 1
Cooler(s)/Kit(s):3967
15-Nov-13 16-Nov-13 Johnnie B. Allen Kristin M Brown
pH adjusted?Yes No N/A
pH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:11/15/13 18:20
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted:Date Contacted:Person Contacted:
Contacted By:Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 1
Page 18 of 19Page 19 of 20
Page 20 of 20
27-Nov-2013
Effective Environmental Inc.
Bruce MacDonald
Dear Bruce,
Re:City of LaPorte UST Work Order:13111115
Fax:(713) 672-6101Tel:(713) 672-6100
9950 Chemical Road
Pasadena, TX 77507
ALS Environmental received 1 sample on 22-Nov-2013 09:00 AM for the analyses presented in the
following report.
Project Manager
Kristin M Brown
Electronically approved by: Kristin M Brown
Certificate No: TX: T104704231-13-12
This is a REVISED REPORT. Please see the Case Narrative for discussion concerning this revision.
The total number of pages in this revised report is 29.
Regards,
ADDRESS 10450 Stancliff Rd, Suite 210 Houston, Texas 77099-4338 | PHONE (281) 530-5656 | FAX (281) 530-5887
ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page 1 of 29
Date: 27-Nov-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 Work Order Sample Summary
Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold
13111115-01T1-S2 Soil 11/21/2013 11:45 11/22/2013 09:00
SS Page 1 of 1
Page 2 of 29
27-Nov-13Date:ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
This data package consists of all or some of the following as applicable:
This signature page, the laboratory review checklist, and the following reportable data:
R1 Field chain-of-custody documentation;
R2 Sample identification cross-reference;
R3 Test reports (analytical data sheets) for each environmental sample that includes:
a) Items consistent with NELAC Chapter 5,
b) dilution factors,
c) preparation methods,
d) cleanup methods, and
e) if required for the project, tentatively identified compounds (TICs).
R4 Surrogate recovery data including:
a) Calculated recovery (%R), and
b) The laboratory’s surrogate QC limits.
R5 Test reports/summary forms for blank samples;
R6 Test reports/summary forms for laboratory control samples (LCSs) including:
a) LCS spiking amounts,
b) Calculated %R for each analyte, and
c)The laboratory’s LCS QC limits.
R7 Test reports for project matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSDs) including:
a) Samples associated with the MS/MSD clearly identified,
b) MS/MSD spiking amounts,
c) Concentration of each MS/MSD analyte measured in the parent and spiked samples,
d) Calculated %Rs and relative percent differences (RPDs), and
e) The laboratory’s MS/MSD QC limits.
R8 Laboratory analytical duplicate (if applicable) recovery and precision:
a) the amount of analyte measured in the duplicate,
b) the calculated RPD, and
c) the laboratory’s QC limits for analytical duplicates.
R9 List of method quantitation limits (MQLs) and detectability check sample results for
each analyte for each method and matrix.
R10 Other problems or anomalies.
The Exception Report for each “No” or “Not Reviewed (NR)” item in Laboratory Review
Checklist and for each analyte, matrix, and method for which the laboratory does not hold
NELAC accreditation under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Page 3 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115
TRRP Laboratory Data
Package Cover Page
Release Statement: I am responsible for the release of this laboratory data package. This laboratory is NELAC
accredited under the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program for all the methods, analytes and matrices reported
in this data package except as noted in the Exception Reports. The data have been reviewed and are technically
compliant with the requirements of the methods used, except where noted by the laboratory in the attached
exception reports. By my signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all problems/anomalies, observed
by the laboratory have been identified by the laboratory in the Laboratory Review Checklist, and no information
affecting the quality of the data has been knowingly withheld.
Check, if applicable: [NA] This laboratory meets an exception under 30 TAC §25.6 and was last inspected by [ ]
TCEQ or [ ] ______________ on (enter date of last inspection). Any findings affecting the data in this laboratory
data package are noted in the Exception Reports herein. The official signing the cover page of the report in which
these data are used is responsible for releasing this data package and is by signature affirming the above release
statement is true.
Kristin M Brown
Kristin M Brown
Project Manager
Page 4 of 29
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/26/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111115
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74909, R157709, R157752
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
R1 OI Chain-of-custody (C-O-C)
Did samples meet the laboratory’s standard conditions of sample acceptability
upon receipt? X
Were all departures from standard conditions described in an exception report? X
R2 OI Sample and quality control (QC) identification
Are all field sample ID numbers cross-referenced to the laboratory ID numbers? X
Are all laboratory ID numbers cross-referenced to the corresponding QC data? X
R3 OI Test reports
Were all samples prepared and analyzed within holding times? X
Other than those results < MQL, were all other raw values bracketed by
calibration standards? X
Were calculations checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were all analyte identifications checked by a peer or supervisor? X
Were sample detection limits reported for all analytes not detected? X
Were all results for soil and sediment samples reported on a dry weight basis? X
Were % moisture (or solids) reported for all soil and sediment samples? X
Were bulk soils/solids samples for volatile analysis extracted with methanol per
SW-846 Method 5035? X
If required for the project, TICs reported? X
R4 O Surrogate recovery data
Were surrogates added prior to extraction? X
Were surrogate percent recoveries in all samples within the laboratory QC
limits? X
R5 OI Test reports/summary forms for blank samples
Were appropriate type(s) of blanks analyzed? X
Were blanks analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process, including
preparation and, if applicable, cleanup procedures? X
Were blank concentrations < MQL? X
R6 OI Laboratory control samples (LCS):
Were all COCs included in the LCS? X
Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure, including prep and
cleanup steps? X
Were LCSs analyzed at the required frequency? X
Were LCS (and LCSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X
Does the detectability data document the laboratory’s capability to detect the
COCs at the MDL used to calculate the SDLs? X
Was the LCSD RPD within QC limits? X
R7 OI Matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) data
Were the project/method specified analytes included in the MS and MSD? X
Were MS/MSD analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were MS (and MSD, if applicable) %Rs within the laboratory QC limits? X 1
Were MS/MSD RPDs within laboratory QC limits? X
R8 OI Analytical duplicate data
Were appropriate analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? X
Were analytical duplicates analyzed at the appropriate frequency? X
Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC limits? X
R9 OI Method quantitation limits (MQLs):
Are the MQLs for each method analyte included in the laboratory data package? X
Do the MQLs correspond to the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration
standard? X
Are unadjusted MQLs and DCSs included in the laboratory data package? X
R10 OI Other problems/anomalies
Are all known problems/anomalies/special conditions noted in this LRC and
ER? X 3
Were all necessary corrective actions performed for the reported data? X
Was applicable and available technology used to lower the SDL and minimize
the matrix interference affects on the sample results? X
Is the laboratory NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Program for
the analytes, matrices and methods associated with this laboratory data package? X 2
Page 5 of 29
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/26/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111115
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74909, R157709, R157752
#1 A2 Description Yes No NA3 NR4 ER#5
S1 OI Initial calibration (ICAL)
Were response factors and/or relative response factors for each analyte within QC
limits? X
Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? X
Was the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? X
Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to
calculate the curve? X
Are ICAL data available for all instruments used? X
Has the initial calibration curve been verified using an appropriate second source
standard? X
S2 OI
Initial and continuing calibration verification (ICCV and CCV) and
continuing calibration blank (CCB)
Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? X
Were percent differences for each analyte within the method-required QC limits? X
Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte? X
Was the absolute value of the analyte concentration in the inorganic CCB < MDL? X
S3 O Mass spectral tuning:
Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? X
Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC limits? X
S4 O Internal standards (IS):
Were IS area counts and retention times within the method-required QC limits? X
S5 OI
Raw data (NELAC section 1 appendix A glossary, and section 5.12 or ISO/IEC
17025 section
Were the raw data (for example, chromatograms, spectral data) reviewed by an
analyst? X
Were data associated with manual integrations flagged on the raw data? X
S6 O Dual column confirmation
Did dual column confirmation results meet the method-required QC? X
S7 O Tentatively identified compounds (TICs):
If TICs were requested, were the mass spectra and TIC data subject to appropriate
checks? X
S8 I Interference Check Sample (ICS) results:
Were percent recoveries within method QC limits? X
S9 I Serial dilutions, post digestion spikes, and method of standard additions
Were percent differences, recoveries, and the linearity within the QC limits
specified in the method? X
S10 OI Method detection limit (MDL) studies
Was a MDL study performed for each reported analyte? X
Is the MDL either adjusted or supported by the analysis of DCSs? X
S11 OI Proficiency test reports:
Was the laboratory's performance acceptable on the applicable proficiency tests or
evaluation studies? X
S12 OI Standards documentation
Are all standards used in the analyses NIST-traceable or obtained from other
appropriate sources? X
S13 OI Compound/analyte identification procedures
Are the procedures for compound/analyte identification documented? X
S14 OI Demonstration of analyst competency (DOC)
Was DOC conducted consistent with NELAC Chapter 5C or ISO/IEC 4? X
Is documentation of the analyst’s competency up-to-date and on file? X
S15 OI
Verification/validation documentation for methods (NELAC Chap 5 or
ISO/IEC 17025 Section 5)
Are all the methods used to generate the data documented, verified, and validated,
where applicable? X
S16 OI Laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs):
Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? X
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be
retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period.
O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable);
NA = Not Applicable;
NR = Not Reviewed;
R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 6 of 29
Laboratory Review Checklist: Reportable Data
Laboratory Name: ALS Laboratory Group LRC Date: 11/26/2013
Project Name: City of LaPorte UST Laboratory Job Number: 13111115
Reviewer Name: Kristin Brown Prep Batch Number(s): 74909, R157709, R157752
ER#5 Description
1
Batch 74909, Texas TPH by Method TX1005, Sample 13111018-01 MS and MSD were performed on an unrelated sample.
2
With the exception of cyclohexane, ALS is NELAC-accredited under the Texas Laboratory Program for the analytes, matrices and methods
associated with this laboratory data package. Because TCEQ does not offer accreditation for this compound, the results are flagged with n.
3
Report was revised 11/27/13 to change the sample name at the request of the client.
Items identified by the letter “R” must be included in the laboratory data package submitted in the TRRP-required report(s). Items identified by the letter “S” should be
retained and made available upon request for the appropriate retention period. O = Organic Analyses; I = Inorganic Analyses (and general chemistry, when applicable); NA = Not Applicable; NR = Not Reviewed; R# = Exception Report identification number (an Exception Report should be completed for an item if “NR” or “No” is checked).
Page 7 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-S2
Collection Date:11/21/2013 11:45 AM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:13111115-01
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
SDL
TEXAS TPH - TX1005 TX1005 Analyst:RPMPrep: TX1005PR / 11/22/13Method:
nC6 to nC12 11/22/2013 19:5162mg/Kg-dry1U12
>nC12 to nC28 11/22/2013 19:5162mg/Kg-dry1U12
>nC28 to nC35 11/22/2013 19:5162mg/Kg-dry1U12
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon 11/22/2013 19:5162mg/Kg-dry1U12
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11/22/2013 19:5170-130%REC 194.4
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 11/22/2013 19:5170-130%REC 198.4
TCL VOLATILES - SW8260C SW8260 Analyst:KKPMethod:
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0025
1,1-Dichloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,1-Dichloroethene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0016
1,2-Dibromoethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0010
1,2-Dichloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00075
1,2-Dichloropropane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
2-Butanone 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0027
2-Hexanone 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Acetone 11/22/2013 12:020.025mg/Kg-dry1U0.0057
Benzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00075
Bromodichloromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00075
Bromoform 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
Bromomethane 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Carbon disulfide 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Carbon tetrachloride 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
Chlorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Chloroethane 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Chloroform 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Chloromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Cyclohexanen11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0015
AR Page 1 of 2
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 8 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Sample ID:T1-S2
Collection Date:11/21/2013 11:45 AM Matrix:SOIL
Analyses ResultQual Units Date Analyzed
MQL
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115
Dilution
Factor
Lab ID:13111115-01
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
SDL
Dibromochloromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Dichlorodifluoromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0022
Dichloromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0017
Ethylbenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
Isopropylbenzene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
m,p-Xylene 11/22/2013 12:020.012mg/Kg-dry1U0.0021
Methyl acetate 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Methyl tert-butyl ether 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0024
Methylcyclohexane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0019
o-Xylene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Styrene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00075
Tetrachloroethene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Toluene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00087
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0011
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.00062
Trichloroethene 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0020
Trichlorofluoromethane 11/22/2013 12:020.0062mg/Kg-dry1U0.0010
Vinyl chloride 11/22/2013 12:020.0025mg/Kg-dry1U0.0012
Xylenes, Total 11/22/2013 12:020.019mg/Kg-dry1U0.0032
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11/22/2013 12:0270-128%REC 194.1
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 11/22/2013 12:0273-126%REC 198.4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 11/22/2013 12:0271-128%REC 1100
Surr: Toluene-d8 11/22/2013 12:0273-127%REC 195.0
MOISTURE SW3550 Analyst:KAHMethod:
Percent Moisture 11/25/2013 14:300.0100wt%119.6 0.010
AR Page 2 of 2
Note:See Qualifiers Page for a list of qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 9 of 29
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
C
l
i
e
n
t
S
a
m
p
l
e
I
D
Co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
Ma
t
r
i
x
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
D
a
t
e
DATES REPORT27-Nov-13
Wo
r
k
O
r
d
e
r
:
13
1
1
1
1
1
5
Cl
i
e
n
t
:
Ef
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
n
c
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Ci
t
y
o
f
L
a
P
o
r
t
e
U
S
T
AL
S
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Pr
e
p
D
a
t
e
TC
L
P
D
a
t
e
74
9
0
9
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Te
x
a
s
T
P
H
-
T
X
1
0
0
5
13
1
1
1
1
1
5
-
0
1
B
T
1
-
S
2
11
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
4
5
:
0
0
A
M
So
i
l
11
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
3
0
7
:
5
1
P
M
11
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
0
0
A
M
R1
5
7
7
0
9
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
TC
L
V
o
l
a
t
i
l
e
s
-
S
W
8
2
6
0
C
13
1
1
1
1
1
5
-
0
1
A
T1
-
S
2
11
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
4
5
:
0
0
A
M
So
i
l
11
/
2
2
/
2
0
1
3
1
2
:
0
2
P
M
R1
5
7
7
5
2
Ba
t
c
h
I
D
Te
s
t
N
a
m
e
:
Mo
i
s
t
u
r
e
13
1
1
1
1
1
5
-
0
1
B
T
1
-
S
2
11
/
2
1
/
2
0
1
3
1
1
:
4
5
:
0
0
A
M
So
i
l
11
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
3
0
2
:
3
0
P
M
1Page:
Pa
g
e
10
of
29
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
Test Name:Moisture
AnalyteMDL Unadjusted MQL
Test Code:MOIST_SW3550
Test Number:SW3550
Units:wt%Matrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:13111115
DCS
InstrumentID:Balance1
Percent MoistureA MOIST 0.01000.010
Page 1 of 4
Page 11 of 29
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
Test Name:Texas TPH - TX1005
AnalyteMDL Unadjusted MQL
Test Code:TX1005_S_REV3
Test Number:TX1005
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:13111115
DCS
InstrumentID:FID-13
>nC12 to nC28A TPHDRO 502310
>nC28 to nC35A 10W40MOTO 502310
nC6 to nC12A TPHGRO 502510
Total Petroleum HydrocarbonM TPH 504710
Surr: 2-FluorobiphenylS 321-60-8 000
Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzeneS 98-08-8 000
Page 2 of 4
Page 12 of 29
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
Test Name:TCL Volatiles - SW8260C
AnalyteMDL Unadjusted MQL
Test Code:8260_TCL4.3_S
Test Number:SW8260
Units:mg/KgMatrix:Solid
Type
METHOD DETECTION /
REPORTING LIMITS
CAS
WorkOrder:13111115
DCS
InstrumentID:VOA5
1,1,1-TrichloroethaneA 71-55-6 0.00500.0020 0.0017
1,1,2,2-TetrachloroethaneA 79-34-5 0.00500.0019 0.00050
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethaneA 76-13-1 0.00500.0019 0.0013
1,1,2-TrichloroethaneA 79-00-5 0.00500.0019 0.0020
1,1-DichloroethaneA 75-34-3 0.00500.0021 0.00050
1,1-DichloroetheneA 75-35-4 0.00500.0022 0.0015
1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneA 120-82-1 0.00500.0019 0.00090
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropaneA 96-12-8 0.00500.0021 0.0013
1,2-DibromoethaneA 106-93-4 0.00500.0020 0.00070
1,2-DichlorobenzeneA 95-50-1 0.00500.0019 0.00080
1,2-DichloroethaneA 107-06-2 0.00500.0021 0.00060
1,2-DichloropropaneA 78-87-5 0.00500.0022 0.00050
1,3-DichlorobenzeneA 541-73-1 0.00500.0019 0.00090
1,4-DichlorobenzeneA 106-46-7 0.00500.0019 0.00070
2-ButanoneA 78-93-3 0.0100.0051 0.0022
2-HexanoneA 591-78-6 0.0100.0047 0.0017
4-Methyl-2-pentanoneA 108-10-1 0.0100.0041 0.0010
AcetoneA 67-64-1 0.0200.0020 0.0046
BenzeneA 71-43-2 0.00500.0020 0.00060
BromodichloromethaneA 75-27-4 0.00500.0019 0.00060
BromoformA 75-25-2 0.00500.0024 0.00070
BromomethaneA 74-83-9 0.0100.0022 0.0010
Carbon disulfideA 75-15-0 0.0100.0036 0.0016
Carbon tetrachlorideA 56-23-5 0.00500.0018 0.0012
ChlorobenzeneA 108-90-7 0.00500.0021 0.00050
ChloroethaneA 75-00-3 0.0100.0022 0.0010
ChloroformA 67-66-3 0.00500.0020 0.0018
ChloromethaneA 74-87-3 0.0100.0022 0.00090
cis-1,2-DichloroetheneA 156-59-2 0.00500.0022 0.0015
cis-1,3-DichloropropeneA 10061-01-5 0.00500.0019 0.00050
CyclohexaneA 110-82-7 0.00500.0019 0.0012
DibromochloromethaneA 124-48-1 0.00500.0018 0.00050
DichlorodifluoromethaneA 75-71-8 0.00500.0022 0.0018
Page 3 of 4
Page 13 of 29
ALS Environmental Date:27-Nov-13
DichloromethaneA 75-09-2 0.0100.0015 0.0014
EthylbenzeneA 100-41-4 0.00500.0020 0.00090
IsopropylbenzeneA 98-82-8 0.00500.0018 0.0010
m,p-XyleneA 179601-23-1 0.0100.0038 0.0017
Methyl acetateA 79-20-9 0.00500.0023 0.0010
Methyl tert-butyl etherA 1634-04-4 0.00500.0020 0.0019
MethylcyclohexaneA 108-87-2 0.00500.0017 0.0015
o-XyleneA 95-47-6 0.00500.0019 0.0010
StyreneA 100-42-5 0.00500.0017 0.00060
TetrachloroetheneA 127-18-4 0.00500.0022 0.0010
TolueneA 108-88-3 0.00500.0019 0.00070
trans-1,2-DichloroetheneA 156-60-5 0.00500.0020 0.00090
trans-1,3-DichloropropeneA 10061-02-6 0.00500.0019 0.00050
TrichloroetheneA 79-01-6 0.00500.0021 0.0016
TrichlorofluoromethaneA 75-69-4 0.00500.0018 0.00080
Vinyl chlorideA 75-01-4 0.00200.0010 0.0010
Xylenes, TotalM 1330-20-7 0.0150.0057 0.0026
Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4S 17060-07-0 000
Surr: 4-BromofluorobenzeneS 460-00-4 000
Surr: DibromofluoromethaneS 1868-53-7 000
Surr: Toluene-d8S 2037-26-5 000
Page 4 of 4
Page 14 of 29
Date: 27-Nov-13ALS Environmental
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74909 Instrument ID FID-12 Method:TX1005
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 09:58 PM
Prep Date:11/22/2013
AnalyteResult%REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3449878
MBLK
Run ID:FID-12_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FBLKS1-131122-74909
nC6 to nC12 U 2550
>nC12 to nC28 U 2550
>nC28 to nC35 U 2550
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon U 5050
0025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 120 70-13030.05 00
0025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 118 70-13029.48 00
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 10:29 PM
Prep Date:11/22/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3449879
LCS
Run ID:FID-12_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FLCSS1-131122-74909
0250nC6 to nC12 98.9 75-125247.2 2550
0250>nC12 to nC28 86.6 75-125216.4 2550
0025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 121 70-13030.14 00
0025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 116 70-13029.09 00
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 11:01 PM
Prep Date:11/22/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3449880
LCSD
Run ID:FID-12_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:FLCSDS1-131122-74909
247.20250nC6 to nC12 97.4 75-125 201.47243.6 2550
216.40250>nC12 to nC28 85.1 75-125 201.69212.8 2550
30.14025 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 118 70-130 202.0429.53 00
29.09025 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 114 70-130 202.3128.42 00
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/23/2013 12:03 A
Prep Date:11/22/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3449883
MS
Run ID:FID-12_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:13111018-01BMS
0248.3nC6 to nC12 95.5 75-125237.2 2550
71.33248.3>nC12 to nC28 193 75-125 S549.8 2550
0024.83 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 130 70-13032.2 00
0024.83 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene 113 70-13028.08 00
QC Page: 1 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 15 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:74909 Instrument ID FID-12 Method:TX1005
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/23/2013 12:34 A
Prep Date:11/22/2013
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:mg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3449884
MSD
Run ID:FID-12_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:13111018-01BMSD
237.20247.8nC6 to nC12 94.4 75-125 201.43233.8 2550
549.871.33247.8>nC12 to nC28 184 75-125 204.06 S5282550
32.2024.78 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 127 70-130 202.2131.49 00
28.08024.78 Surr: Trifluoromethyl benzene111 70-130 201.6627.62 00
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:13111115-
01B
QC Page: 2 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 16 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 11:39 A
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3447660
MBLK
Run ID:VOA5_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:VBLKS1-112213-R157709
1,1,1-Trichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane U 2.55.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1-Dichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,1-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dibromoethane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichloroethane U 2.55.0
1,2-Dichloropropane U 2.55.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene U 2.55.0
2-Butanone U 510
2-Hexanone U 510
4-Methyl-2-pentanone U 510
Acetone U 520
Benzene U 2.55.0
Bromodichloromethane U 2.55.0
Bromoform U 2.55.0
Bromomethane U 2.510
Carbon disulfide U 510
Carbon tetrachloride U 2.55.0
Chlorobenzene U 2.55.0
Chloroethane U 2.510
Chloroform U 2.55.0
Chloromethane U 2.510
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene U 2.55.0
Cyclohexane U 2.55.0
Dibromochloromethane U 2.55.0
Dichlorodifluoromethane U 2.55.0
Dichloromethane U 2.510
Ethylbenzene U 2.55.0
Isopropylbenzene U 2.55.0
m,p-Xylene U 510
Methyl acetate U 2.55.0
QC Page: 3 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 17 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Methyl tert-butyl ether U 2.55.0
Methylcyclohexane U 2.55.0
o-Xylene U 2.55.0
Styrene U 2.55.0
Tetrachloroethene U 2.55.0
Toluene U 2.55.0
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene U 2.55.0
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene U 2.55.0
Trichloroethene U 2.55.0
Trichlorofluoromethane U 2.55.0
Vinyl chloride U 1.22.0
Xylenes, Total U 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92.8 70-12846.4 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene97.8 73-12648.91 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 99.2 71-12849.58 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 96.4 73-12748.21 00
QC Page: 4 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 18 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 10:52 A
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3447659
LCS
Run ID:VOA5_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:VLCSS1-112213-R157709
0501,1,1-Trichloroethane 112 79-12455.86 2.55.0
0501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 95.1 75-12347.54 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 114 79-12557.15 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichloroethane 95.9 79-12047.97 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethane 110 75-12455.15 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethene 115 80-12257.49 2.55.0
0501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 100 74-12850.03 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 95.7 66-12947.84 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromoethane 98.6 70-12049.31 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichlorobenzene 97.6 75-12048.78 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloroethane 102 73-12150.95 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloropropane 105 76-12052.59 2.55.0
0501,3-Dichlorobenzene 99.8 70-12549.89 2.55.0
0501,4-Dichlorobenzene 99.1 77-12049.57 2.55.0
01002-Butanone 96 65-13096.01 510
01002-Hexanone 91.4 65-13391.43 510
01004-Methyl-2-pentanone 94.8 69-13094.84 510
0100Acetone 87.3 53-14287.26 520
050Benzene 111 79-12055.32 2.55.0
050Bromodichloromethane 110 79-12154.76 2.55.0
050Bromoform 98.4 74-12249.21 2.55.0
050Bromomethane 104 68-13152.11 2.510
0100Carbon disulfide 116 80-124116.3 510
050Carbon tetrachloride 112 74-12656.19 2.55.0
050Chlorobenzene 103 79-12051.26 2.55.0
050Chloroethane 108 76-12654.06 2.510
050Chloroform 109 78-12054.67 2.55.0
050Chloromethane 98.9 69-12949.43 2.510
050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 108 80-12054.14 2.55.0
050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene108 77-12353.78 2.55.0
050Cyclohexane 113 74-12656.44 2.55.0
050Dibromochloromethane 103 78-12251.42 2.55.0
050Dichlorodifluoromethane 81 57-14040.48 2.55.0
050Dichloromethane 97.6 62-13048.81 2.510
050Ethylbenzene 104 80-12251.78 2.55.0
050Isopropylbenzene 105 72-12752.29 2.55.0
0100m,p-Xylene 104 79-122104.4 510
050Methyl acetate 87 69-12343.49 2.55.0
QC Page: 5 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 19 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
050Methyl tert-butyl ether 107 76-12153.36 2.55.0
050Methylcyclohexane 114 77-12656.93 2.55.0
050o-Xylene 103 80-12351.55 2.55.0
050Styrene 103 78-12451.36 2.55.0
050Tetrachloroethene 97.4 73-12948.7 2.55.0
050Toluene 103 79-12051.41 2.55.0
050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 115 79-12257.56 2.55.0
050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene107 77-12053.41 2.55.0
050Trichloroethene 111 80-12155.49 2.55.0
050Trichlorofluoromethane 112 75-12655.77 2.55.0
050Vinyl chloride 108 76-12654.03 1.22.0
0150Xylenes, Total 104 80-120155.9 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94.9 70-12847.47 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene101 73-12650.65 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 103 71-12851.55 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 93.6 73-12746.81 00
QC Page: 6 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 20 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 12:25 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3447662
MS
Run ID:VOA5_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311957-01AMS
0501,1,1-Trichloroethane 115 79-12457.53 2.55.0
0501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 99.8 75-12349.91 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 113 79-12556.44 2.55.0
0501,1,2-Trichloroethane 101 79-12050.42 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethane 113 75-12456.75 2.55.0
0501,1-Dichloroethene 115 80-12257.6 2.55.0
0501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 99.8 74-12849.88 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 91.4 66-12945.69 2.55.0
0501,2-Dibromoethane 106 70-12053.05 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichlorobenzene 101 75-12050.55 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloroethane 110 73-12155.24 2.55.0
0501,2-Dichloropropane 109 76-12054.6 2.55.0
0501,3-Dichlorobenzene 102 70-12551.03 2.55.0
0501,4-Dichlorobenzene 102 77-12050.82 2.55.0
01002-Butanone 101 65-130101.3 510
01002-Hexanone 98.5 65-13398.49 510
01004-Methyl-2-pentanone 95.9 69-13095.92 510
0100Acetone 93.9 53-14293.87 520
050Benzene 111 79-12055.44 2.55.0
050Bromodichloromethane 113 79-12156.47 2.55.0
050Bromoform 101 74-12250.63 2.55.0
050Bromomethane 103 68-13151.69 2.510
0100Carbon disulfide 117 80-124117.2 510
050Carbon tetrachloride 109 74-12654.6 2.55.0
050Chlorobenzene 107 79-12053.45 2.55.0
050Chloroethane 110 76-126552.510
050Chloroform 118 78-12058.85 2.55.0
050Chloromethane 101 69-12950.34 2.510
050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 116 80-12058.06 2.55.0
050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene110 77-12354.93 2.55.0
050Cyclohexane 112 74-126562.55.0
050Dibromochloromethane 108 78-12253.8 2.55.0
050Dichlorodifluoromethane 80.3 57-14040.13 2.55.0
050Dichloromethane 104 62-13051.8 2.510
050Ethylbenzene 104 80-12252.19 2.55.0
050Isopropylbenzene 106 72-12753.09 2.55.0
0100m,p-Xylene 106 79-122105.9 510
050Methyl acetate 91.8 69-12345.9 2.55.0
QC Page: 7 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 21 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
050Methyl tert-butyl ether 113 76-12156.56 2.55.0
050Methylcyclohexane 111 77-12655.61 2.55.0
050o-Xylene 105 80-12352.67 2.55.0
050Styrene 107 78-12453.56 2.55.0
050Tetrachloroethene 111 73-12955.68 2.55.0
050Toluene 106 79-12052.93 2.55.0
050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 118 79-12258.86 2.55.0
050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene107 77-12053.65 2.55.0
050Trichloroethene 113 80-12156.55 2.55.0
050Trichlorofluoromethane 111 75-12655.34 2.55.0
050Vinyl chloride 109 76-12654.74 1.22.0
0150Xylenes, Total 106 80-120158.6 7.510
0050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97.2 70-12848.6 00
0050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene99.8 73-12649.89 00
0050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 102 71-12850.98 00
0050 Surr: Toluene-d8 94.9 73-12747.46 00
QC Page: 8 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 22 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/22/2013 12:48 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:µg/Kg
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3447663
MSD
Run ID:VOA5_131122A
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:1311957-01AMSD
57.530501,1,1-Trichloroethane 112 79-124 302.2656.24 2.55.0
49.910501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 93.4 75-123 306.5946.72 2.55.0
56.440501,1,2-Trichlor-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 113 79-125 300.2756.29 2.55.0
50.420501,1,2-Trichloroethane 95.5 79-120 305.447.77 2.55.0
56.750501,1-Dichloroethane 110 75-124 303.3854.86 2.55.0
57.60501,1-Dichloroethene 115 80-122 300.15857.51 2.55.0
49.880501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 96.1 74-128 303.748.07 2.55.0
45.690501,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 90.1 66-129 301.3745.07 2.55.0
53.050501,2-Dibromoethane 99.5 70-120 306.3649.77 2.55.0
50.550501,2-Dichlorobenzene 95.3 75-120 305.9647.63 2.55.0
55.240501,2-Dichloroethane 104 73-121 305.7652.14 2.55.0
54.60501,2-Dichloropropane 104 76-120 304.7452.07 2.55.0
51.030501,3-Dichlorobenzene 96.1 70-125 305.9648.07 2.55.0
50.820501,4-Dichlorobenzene 96.9 77-120 304.8248.43 2.55.0
101.301002-Butanone 91.7 65-130 309.9691.73 510
98.4901002-Hexanone 92.4 65-133 306.3592.43 510
95.9201004-Methyl-2-pentanone 96.1 69-130 300.1696.07 510
93.870100Acetone91.6 53-142 302.4791.58 520
55.44050Benzene110 79-120 301.2354.77 2.55.0
56.47050Bromodichloromethane108 79-121 304.7253.86 2.55.0
50.63050Bromoform98 74-122 303.348.99 2.55.0
51.69050Bromomethane103 68-131 300.2851.54 2.510
117.20100Carbon disulfide 116 80-124 300.983116510
54.6050Carbon tetrachloride 112 74-126 302.54562.55.0
53.45050Chlorobenzene101 79-120 305.2450.73 2.55.0
55050Chloroethane107 76-126 302.7153.53 2.510
58.85050Chloroform110 78-120 306.6955.04 2.55.0
50.34050Chloromethane100 69-129 300.61450.03 2.510
58.06050cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 113 80-120 303.0556.32 2.55.0
54.93050cis-1,3-Dichloropropene108 77-123 301.8853.9 2.55.0
56050Cyclohexane112 74-126 300.048956.03 2.55.0
53.8050Dibromochloromethane103 78-122 304.6251.37 2.55.0
40.13050Dichlorodifluoromethane79 57-140 301.5839.5 2.55.0
51.8050Dichloromethane98.9 62-130 304.6249.46 2.510
52.19050Ethylbenzene102 80-122 302.5250.89 2.55.0
53.09050Isopropylbenzene103 72-127 303.3451.35 2.55.0
105.90100m,p-Xylene 103 79-122 302.6103.2 510
45.9050Methyl acetate 97.5 69-123 306.0748.77 2.55.0
QC Page: 9 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 23 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157709 Instrument ID VOA5 Method:SW8260
56.56050Methyl tert-butyl ether 107 76-121 305.5953.49 2.55.0
55.61050Methylcyclohexane111 77-126 300.090955.56 2.55.0
52.67050o-Xylene 101 80-123 304.150.55 2.55.0
53.56050Styrene101 78-124 305.6350.62 2.55.0
55.68050Tetrachloroethene92.4 73-129 3018.646.21 2.55.0
52.93050Toluene102 79-120 303.9350.89 2.55.0
58.86050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 114 79-122 303.6556.75 2.55.0
53.65050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene106 77-120 300.95653.14 2.55.0
56.55050Trichloroethene109 80-121 303.6554.53 2.55.0
55.34050Trichlorofluoromethane111 75-126 300.013455.33 2.55.0
54.74050Vinyl chloride 108 76-126 301.753.82 1.22.0
158.60150Xylenes, Total 102 79-123 303.1153.7 7.510
48.6050 Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.3 70-128 301.9647.66 00
49.89050 Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene102 73-126 302.0350.91 00
50.98050 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 102 71-128 300.45451.21 00
47.46050 Surr: Toluene-d8 93.8 73-127 301.1446.92 00
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:13111115-
01A
QC Page: 10 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 24 of 29
Project:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
Work Order:13111115 QC BATCH REPORT
Batch ID:R157752 Instrument ID Balance1 Method:SW3550(Dissolve)
Qual
RPD
Limit
Analysis Date:11/25/2013 02:30 PM
Prep Date:
AnalyteResult %REC%RPD
Units:wt%
MQL
Client ID:SeqNo:3448982
DUP
Run ID:BALANCE1_131125C
SPK Val
SPK Ref
Value
RPD Ref
Value
Control
Limit
DF:1
Sample ID:13111034-29ADUP
18.92Percent Moisture 202.2819.35 00.0100
The following samples were analyzed in this batch:13111115-
01B
QC Page: 11 of 11
Note: See Qualifiers Page for a list of Qualifiers and their explanation.
Page 25 of 29
ALS Environmental Date: 27-Nov-13
QUALIFIERS,
ACRONYMS, UNITSProject:City of LaPorte UST
Client:Effective Environmental Inc.
WorkOrder:13111115
Units Reported Description
Qualifier Description
Acronym Description
Milligrams per Kilogram - Dry weight correctedmg/Kg-dry
wt%
Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*
Not accrediteda
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitB
Value above quantitation rangeE
Analyzed outside of Holding TimeH
Analyte detected below quantitation limitJ
Manually integrated, see raw data for justificationM
Not offered for accreditationn
Not Detected at the Reporting LimitND
Sample amount is > 4 times amount spikedO
Dual Column results percent difference > 40%P
RPD above laboratory control limitR
Spike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsS
Analyzed but not detected above the MDLU
Detectability Check StudyDCS
Method DuplicateDUP
Laboratory Control SampleLCS
Laboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSD
Method BlankMBLK
Method Detection LimitMDL
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Matrix SpikeMS
Matrix Spike DuplicateMSD
Post Digestion SpikePDS
Practical Quantitation LimitPQL
Serial DilutionSD
Sample Detection LimitSDL
Texas Risk Reduction ProgramTRRP
QF Page 1 of 1
Page 26 of 29
ALS Environmental
Sample Receipt Checklist
Client Name:EFFECTIVE ENV-HOU
Work Order: 13111115
Date/Time Received:22-Nov-13 09:00
Received by:PS
Checklist completed by
eSignature Date
Reviewed by:
DateeSignature
Matrices:Soil
Carrier name:ALS.HS
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?Yes No Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?Yes No Not Present
Chain of custody present?Yes No
Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received?Yes No
Chain of custody agrees with sample labels?Yes No
Samples in proper container/bottle?Yes No
Sample containers intact?Yes No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test?Yes No
All samples received within holding time?Yes No
Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance?Yes No
Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?
Water - pH acceptable upon receipt?Yes No N/A
Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s):5.1c/5.1c C/U
Login Notes:
IR1
Cooler(s)/Kit(s):5507
22-Nov-13 22-Nov-13 Paresh M. Giga Kristin M Brown
pH adjusted?Yes No N/A
pH adjusted by:
Date/Time sample(s) sent to storage:11/22/13 10:17
CorrectiveAction:
Comments:
Client Contacted:Date Contacted:Person Contacted:
Contacted By:Regarding:
SRC Page 1 of 1
Page 27 of 29
Page 28 of 29
Page 29 of 29
6545s3
WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION
6545s3
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
1 of 3
6545s4
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
City of La Porte
“Ghost” Underground Storage Tank Removals
120 South 2nd Street
La Porte, Harris County, Texas
PHOTO 1
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
Southeast
TAKEN BY:
Adam Cortez (E2)
DESCRIPTION:
View of UST area
prior to removal
activities.
PHOTO 2
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
NA
TAKEN BY:
Adam Cortez (E2)
DESCRIPTION:
Excavating first
UST.
2 of 3
6545s4
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
City of La Porte
“Ghost” Underground Storage Tank Removals
120 South 2nd Street
La Porte,Harris County,Texas
PHOTO 3
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
NA
TAKEN BY:
Adam Cortez (E2)
DESCRIPTION:
Removing UST
from excavation.
PHOTO 4
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
North
TAKEN BY:
Tetra Tech
DESCRIPTION:
USTs removed
from excavation.
3 of 3
6545s4
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
City of La Porte
“Ghost” Underground Storage Tank Removals
120 South 2nd Street
La Porte, Harris County, Texas
PHOTO 5
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
North
TAKEN BY:
Tetra Tech
DESCRIPTION:
Excavation
following UST
removals.
PHOTO 6
DATE:
11/15/2013
DIRECTION:
South
TAKEN BY:
Tetra Tech
DESCRIPTION:
Stockpiled soil in
roll-off.
6545s3
TANK DESTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION
December 5, 2013
Jeffrey J. Blanken, P.G. Tetra Tech
2901 Wilcrest, Suite 405 Houston, Texas 77042
832.251.6046
Jeff.Blanken@tetratech.com
RE: CERTIFICATION OF DESTRUCTION TWO (2) 1,000 GALLON STEELFROM 120 SOUTH 2nd STREET
LA PORTE, TEXAS
I, Adam Cortez certify that on or about November 15th, 2013, Two (2) 1,000 gallons USTs
were properly rendered non-usable and destroyed for scrap recycling. The tanks
were taken to Texas Port Recycling in Houston, Texas.
Prior to delivery of the USTs to the recycler, they were inspected and confirmed to be free of
any signs of product or vapors, by Adam Cortez of Effective Environmental, Inc.
Adam Cortez
________________________________
Adam Cortez
Effective Environmental, Inc.
9950 Chemical Road www.Eff-Env.com 2515 S. Beltline Road
Pasadena, Texas 77507 Mesquite, Texas 75181
281.842.0800 972.329.1200 281.474.2580 Facsimile 972.329.1206 Facsimile
6545s3
STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
6545s2
STATEMENT OF LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
At the time the data in this report were generated, the laboratory (ALS Laboratories) was
NELAC-accredited (T104704231-13-12) through the Texas Laboratory Accreditation Program
for the environmental matrices, analytical methods, and parameters analyzed.