My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-1987-1501
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
Ordinances - GR1000-05
>
1980's
>
1987
>
O-1987-1501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:38:44 PM
Creation date
7/24/2006 11:05:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
1/26/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Minutes of Planning and Zoning Commission <br />August 29, 1985 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />single family special lot. <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson entertained a motion to adoDt staff <br />recommendation as result of public inDut for Section 5-404 (2) <br />(a) (2), 5-404 (2) (a) (5), Section 5-501, Section '5-600. <br />Motion made by Mr. Blackwell, Seconded by Mrs. Graves, Motion <br />carried with no ODDosition. <br /> <br />A ten minute recess was called here by Chairman Wilson and <br />meeting convened at 8:30 p.m. <br /> <br />14) Section 5-700, Table B (Residential): <br /> <br />Staff felt that a 45 ft. height for a single family <br />neighborhood is an extremely high structure~ Staff felt this <br />to be a bit excessive. Chief Building Official David Paulissen <br />explained why staff felt it best to leave 35 ft. as an <br />appropriate height in a single family residential. <br /> <br />Mr. Boyle asked what the procedure was to change the height in <br />an R-1 zone. <br /> <br />David Paulissen told him the appeal procedure in the ordinance <br />is how that would have to be done. <br /> <br />If they had to go higher than the 35 feet, they would have to <br />give reason before the Board of Adjustment. <br /> <br />Chairman Wilson asked if there was a concensus or any objection <br />to adopting recommendation that would leave the height <br />restriction at 35 feet for a single-family detached and include <br />45 feet for duplexes, townhouses, quadraplexes and multi-family <br />dwelling units accord~ng to citizen comments. There were no <br />objections, so the commission moved to the second portion of' <br />Section 5-100. <br /> <br />The next citizen comment on Table B relates to density for <br />single family detached dwelling units. Chief Building Official <br />David Paulissen explained that density figures are measured in <br />units per acre. Staff did not see any problem with changing <br />the density from 4.5 to 4.8 because it is still within the <br />respective districts as set forth in the land use plan, and a <br />change to the suggested figures should not impact the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.