My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-2004-1501-BBBB scup 04-013
LaPorte
>
Legislative records
>
GR1000-05 Ordinances - GR1000-05 Ordinances & Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2004
>
O-2004-1501-BBBB scup 04-013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:12 PM
Creation date
10/30/2006 1:26:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
10/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Preserve at Taylor Bayou <br />September 16, 2004 <br />Page 3 of7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The sampling was 11 hours (0700-1800 hours) on January 22, 2004, <br />and accounts for McCabe Road from the East and West, and <br />Northbound SH 146 mainlane. This sample is relatively light since it <br />appears to have been conducted only once. Most surveys take multiple <br />days (at least two). <br /> <br />The study mentions the future TxDOT Highway 146 improvements, <br />but concludes no impact on the study or development. The study gives <br />a cursory mention of other developments but generalizes a 5% annual <br />growth and takes that factor into the estimates for the survey. That <br />rate is average for the HGAC region although local estimates can be <br />much higher. The growth, according to the study, will not have a <br />significant impact on the development or the traffic flow in relation to <br />level-of-service ratings because of the limited access between McCabe <br />Road and SH 146 now and in the future. <br /> <br />With Level-Of-Service (LOS) A being the best, LOS D being <br />acceptable and LOS F being severely congested service, the study cites <br />that the development, given the parameters stated above, will rate no <br />worse than LOS B and concludes no adverse impact for this <br />development. <br /> <br />. Topography - This area is relatively flat and stable and should not be an <br />obstacle to this type of development. The site for this development does, <br />however, split Flood Zone X to the west and a Flood Zone to the East. <br /> <br />. Density - Staff utilized the Land Use Plan as a guide with the designated <br />land use as Low Density Residential. In previous conversations, the <br />applicant stated that due to changes in legislation, he received <br />notification from the Army Corps of Engineers that more acreage of this <br />project could be developed, Applying a development ratio of 4.8 units <br />per acre (Section 106-333), Mr. Burchfield and Mr. Dutko feel the <br />property could yield approximately 616 single-family units. This <br />information has not been verified. <br /> <br />The applicant feels strongly about the Preserve portion of the <br />development, therefore, this current plan designates only 28,43 acres to <br />be developed as a 180-unit multi-family residential development and a <br />ISO-unit townhome development. Applying a density allowed by <br />ordinance of 14 and 10 units per acre (respectively), this yields 12,86 <br />acres for apartments and 15 acres for townhome units. Using the strict <br />guidelines of Chapter 106, tllere is sufficient acreage to support tile <br />General Plan. Tile townllome portion of tile Plan, 1I0wever, would be <br />designed witll a configuration of no more t/,an tllree attac/led dwelling <br />units constructed in a series or group of attaclled units wit/I property <br />lines separating sucll units. Any other design will classify the <br />townhome portion as a multi-family residential development and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.