My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
O-2006-2781-C Passed - original 2004
LaPorte
>
.Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2006
>
O-2006-2781-C Passed - original 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 3:39:18 PM
Creation date
2/22/2008 12:16:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislative Records
Legislative Type
Ordinance
Date
10/9/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Retiree <br />(Over/Under 65) Calculation <br /> <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Retiree Cost Exhibit V <br /> <br />To further refine plan contributions by capturing active versus retiree healthcare costs, <br />Humana was asked to retrospectively abstract plan participants into three classifications <br />(actives, retirees over 65 and retirees under 65). This report was made available last <br />week and includes retrospective capture of claims by these three groups. What we have <br />learned is as follows for the experience period 3/2005 to 312006. <br /> <br /> Units Members Claims $ Cost PMPM <br />Active 326 849 $2,414,610 $237.00 <br />Retiree Under 65 30 62 $286,709 $385.36 <br />Retiree over 65 18 33 $ 79,004 $199.50 <br /> 374 944 $2,780,323 $245.43 <br /> <br />*Keep in mind that the membership has increased during the year. Actual cost PMPM as <br />shown here reflects the entire year. (Members include employees and individual <br />dependents; these are actual persons in the plan). <br /> <br />This exercise leads to a discussion of how retiree versus active rates should be calculated. <br />In the past, the claims experience for the entire group was the basis for calculation. With <br />one years data now captured, it is feasible to set separate rates for each category. <br /> <br />We can project rates based on the cost PMPM using a simple multiple or load factor. The <br />more difficult task is to project what the effect of that type of premium change would <br />have on participation. With the advent of GASB-45 it is reasonable to assume that the <br />actuarial study will focus on the actual health cost of the retiree population and how that <br />cost is projected on a downstream (future) basis. (GASB-45 actuarial services proposal <br />will be provided to Cynthia in the first week of April). <br /> <br />If we are to review the above PMPM cost and project premiums for retirees in an exact <br />multiple of active cost the factors would be: <br /> <br />Active = X <br />Retiree under 65 = X + 63% <br />Retiree over 65 = X - 16% <br /> <br />Since the City can utilize actual retiree cost as a basis for calculating retiree rates, it is <br />therefore reasonable to propose the following illustrations (Exhibit 5). A fixed expense <br />load for administration and stop loss of $30.72 will be added to each rate. Exhibit 6 is the <br />retiree claims and participation data from Humana. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />tHRH <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />hilb rogal &. hobbs" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.