My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2017-11-13 Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council Minutes
LaPorte
>
City Meetings
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2010's
>
2017
>
2017-11-13 Regular Meeting of the La Porte City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2017 1:25:33 PM
Creation date
12/12/2017 1:25:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/11/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Engelken made a motion to approve Consent Agenda Items pursuant to staff <br /> recommendations. Councilmember Jay Martin seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED <br /> UNANIMOUSLY 9/0 on Items 6 (a)-(g) and (i)-(I). <br /> Regarding Consent Agenda Item 6(h), Councilmember Earp abstained from voting on this item. <br /> MOTION PASSED 8/0/1. <br /> Ayes: Mayor Rigby, Councilmembers Leonard, Engelken, Ojeda, <br /> Zemanek, Kaminski, J. Martin, and K. Martin <br /> Nays: None <br /> Abstention: Councilmember Earp <br /> 7. AUTHORIZATIONS <br /> (a) Consider approval or other action authorizing the Planning Department to issue permits for <br /> use of temporary FEMA trailers with restrictions for City of La Porte residents affected by <br /> Hurricane Harvey — R. Mancilla <br /> Planning and Development Director Richard Mancilla presented a summary. <br /> Councilmember Leonard made a motion to authorize the Planning Department to issue permits, <br /> with some restrictions, for use of temporary FEMA trailers for City of La Porte residents affected by <br /> Hurricane Harvey. Councilmember Zemanek seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED <br /> UNANIMOUSLY 9/0. <br /> (b) Consider approval or other action regarding an Ordinance to repeal Ordinance 2017-3682, <br /> which provided for the condemnation of a dangerous/substandard commercial building <br /> located at 621 W. Main St. — Mayor Rigby <br /> Mayor Rigby presented the item for discussion and possible action. <br /> After lengthy discussion between councilmembers, the owner, the city manager, the engineer, and <br /> the assistant city attorney, Councilmember Earp stated he would be willing to propose granting up <br /> to 30 days to get a City permit and get building materials ordered. He stated that from the time they <br /> order the building, it will take four— five months to build it. From permitting to erecting the building, <br /> it would take five months on a fast track. Mayor asked, so, five months from tomorrow? <br /> Councilmember Earp said they've got 30 days to get a permit and get a building ordered. The <br /> owner said, "We can do that." A total of roughly six months — permit to finish — would give a <br /> completion date of June 1, 2018. <br /> Councilmember Earp stated he would be in favor of granting until June 1 to have the project <br /> completed, but the owner must have a permit issued within 30 days from tomorrow. If a permit has <br /> not been issued within 30 days from tomorrow, then the building remains on the dangerous building <br /> list for demolition. Councilmembers Zemanek and Leonard agreed. <br /> Assistant City Attorney Clark Askins offered that an amendment could be made in the last section <br /> of the repeal ordinance currently being considered by Council to provide for a 28-day delayed <br /> effective date instead of becoming effective immediately. <br /> As Mr. Askins understands, he stated a motion could be made to pass tonight's ordinance, which <br /> would have the effect of repealing the condemnation ordinance (0-2017-3682) passed <br /> September 25, 2017, but with an amendment to add a 28-day delayed effective date. What council <br /> would be looking for in that 28-day period is proof the owner has been issued the necessary <br /> permit(s). If that doesn't happen, if the owner does not meet that condition, the repeal ordinance <br /> would not go into effect; and the demolition ordinance (Ordinance 2017-3682) would stand. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> November 13, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.