Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br />Meeting of 9/29/94 <br />SCU94-001 <br />Page 6~of 9 <br />fenced and no new structures can be built within this area. <br />Right-of--way: The use of public rights-of--way must also be <br />considered. The 12th Street and "J" Street rights-of--way run <br />through this property. Portions, but not all of these rights-of- <br />way have been closed. As part of the Southern Pacific General <br />Plan review process, the City had agreed in principle, to close, <br />abandon, and deed to Southern Pacific, certain portions of the <br />remaining rights-of--way that cross this property, provided that, <br />in return, Southern Pacific deeded to the City, property needed <br />to facilitate F-101 and other street and drainage improvement <br />projects. As of this date, however, the streets have not yet been <br />closed and the City has not given consent for the rights-of--way <br />~to be fenced or leased. Additionally, it should be noted that it <br />is the responsibility of Southern Pacific, the actual property <br />owner, to petition City Council regarding this issue. <br />. Until such time that this issue is resolved, dedicated rights-of- <br />• way that extend into this tract must remain open and <br />unobstructed. Further, in staff's opinion, any request by <br />Southern Pacific should be in the form of a detailed plan that <br />will preserve the City's control of these rights-of--way. <br />Highway 146 Widening: Another right-of--way issue is the <br />widening of Highway 146. The highway is to be widened <br />slightly in the vicinity of the "L" Street right-of--way. 'T'his will <br />be done in conjunction with the final construction phases of the <br />Fred Hartman Bridge approach/Hwys. 146-225 interchange. <br />The State Highway Department has provided right-of--way <br />acquisition plans to the City. Fencing along the Highway 146 <br />face of the property should follow the lines established on the <br />right-of--way map. This will prevent the Highway Department <br />and the City of La Porte from having to pay to remove and <br />relocate fencing. Under State guidelines, 10% of this cost <br />would be borne by the City. It will also lessen the possibility of <br />accidental livestock release during road construction. <br />Livestock Concentrations: The next issue to consider is <br />livestock concentration. As noted earlier, both staff and the <br />applicant agree that because of the condition of this property, <br />it will not support a two animal per acre concentration. Based <br />on the applicant's testimony regarding the condition of this <br />