My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
04-28-16 04-28-16 Regular Called Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Agenda packets 2010 to current
>
Planning/Inspections
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2016
>
04-28-16 04-28-16 Regular Called Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2016 4:09:30 PM
Creation date
3/7/2025 1:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
La Porte TX
Document Type
Agenda PACKETS
Date
4/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mainhouserequiresafivefootsetbackfromthenewpropertyline,whichisthereasonfor <br />theneedofafrontagevariance.Mr.Enseystatedthatthelocationoftheexistinghouseon <br />thesouthernportionofthelotforcesthecreationofasmallerlot,whichtriggersthelot <br />coveragevariance. <br />Mr.Enseyconfirmedthatallrequirementsforpublichearingnotificationhavebeenmet. <br />NoticesofthepublichearingweremailedtoallpropertyownerslocatedwithinЋЉЉofthe <br />subjectsite.Threepropertyownersweredirectlynotifiedofthepublichearingviamail. <br />b.ApplicantPresentation <br />ChairmanRothermelsworeintheapplicant,KathleenLemon.Ms.Lemonsaidthatthe <br />setbackvariancewasinordertomatchtheƓĻźŭŷĬƚƩƭhousesandvisuallylookmore <br />aestheticallyappearingonthestreet.Theapplicantalsonotedthattheywereonlythelot <br />coveragemaximumpercentagebecauseofthefactthatthehousewillhaveoverhangsand <br />decksandthereisgreenspaceintheformofasewereasementadjacenttoherproperty. <br />c.PublicComments <br />Therewerenopubliccomments. <br />d.QuestionandAnswer <br />NettieWarrenaskediftheroofoverhangsdoinfactcountaspartofthelotcoverage <br />percentageandMr.Enseyconfirmedthattheydid. <br />Motion byCharlesSchoppetoapprovethefollowingvariances:1)Aproposedlotfrontageof <br />ЍАcontrarytotheprovisionsofSection106333thatrequiresa50footfrontage;2)the <br />northernlotwilltotal4,700squarefeetinareacontrarytotheprovisionsofSection106333 <br />thatrequiresaminimum6,000squarefootlotforsinglefamilydevelopment;3)afrontsetback <br />of15feetfromthefrontpropertylinecontrarytoSection106333thatrequiresaminimum <br />setbackofЋЎfromthefrontpropertyline;4)alotcoverageof44.2%fortheproposednew <br />houseonthenorthernlotcontrarytotheprovisionsofSection106333thatallowsamaximum <br />lotcoverageof40%. <br />Second byNettieWarren.MotionCarried. <br />Ayes:RodRothermel,T.J.Walker,NettieWarren,andCharlesSchoppe <br />Nays:None <br />AssistantCityAttorneyClarkAskinsreadfromSection106196oftheCodeofOrdinances: <br />AppealsfromtheBoardofAdjustment. <br />5.AdministrativeReports <br />CityPlannerthankedtheBoardformakingtimeforthespecialcalledmeetingandnotedthere <br />werecurrentlynoagendaitemsforthenextmeeting. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.