Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Building Codes Ad Hoc Commit <br />Minutes of December 17,2003 <br /> <br />Page 2 Of 4 <br /> <br />5. CONTINUE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDER ACTION ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF <br />CONSTRUCTION CODES (C3, ICC OR A COMBINATION OF THE CODES). <br /> <br />No discussion occurred on this item. <br /> <br />6. CONTINUE DISCUSSION AND CONSIDER ACTION ON THE RECOMMENDATION ON <br />THE CODES OF APPEAL BOARD AUTHORITY, ORGANIZATION, MAKE-UP AND <br />PROCESS/PROCEDURES. <br /> <br />Discussion began with Carlos Smith suggesting a non-partial public board of not less than three nor <br />more than five members. This board would have authority to appoint subcommittees that would be <br />utilized when needed. Members shared opinions for and against this proposal. Chairman Clausen <br />suggested reviewing "Option C" that was distributed at a prior meeting. <br /> <br />Bill White excused himself at 7:40 P. M. and left the room. He was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />Tom Campbell made a motion that "Option D" be developed for Mr. Smith's proposal of a non- <br />partial public board, It can be one of the various options considered by this committee in their <br />selection of a recommended Appeal Board, Carlos Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chairman Clausen reminded members that a consensus on the codes and the appeal board is needed <br />before a "recommendation" presentation can be made to City Council. <br /> <br />As discussed at the previous meeting, Chairman Clausen suggested the structure of the Board be as <br />follows: <br /> <br />.:. I Citizen <br />.:. 1 Master Plumber <br />.:. 1 Master Electrician <br />.:. 1 Master HV AC technician <br />.:. 1 Engineer <br />.:. 1 Architect <br />.:. 1 General Contractor <br />.:. Building Official (ex-officio) <br /> <br />Other requirements of the board were discussed, Nick Finan advised the members he had researched <br />the matter and found no ordinance that requires a board member be a resident of La Porte. Although, <br />typically it is "understood" that this would be the first requirement, the committee could submit <br />something different for approval by Council. <br /> <br />Carlos Smith made a motion that each member ofthe Board be a resident of the City of La Porte <br />unless it is not possible to find a qualified candidate that is willing to serve. In such case, the City <br />should then consider a person that has a business located within the city and performs work within the <br />city. If still no person is found, the City should look for a candidate that either has a business located <br />within the city or performs work within the city. Second by Tom Campbell. Motion passed, <br />