Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Regular Meeting 10/23/74 - Continued 3 <br />4. REZONING 8.9957 ACRES - ABSTRACT 5 - E. BRINSON <br />SURVEY - CONTINUED - Mayor Thomas asked if there was <br />anyone present desiring to speak in opposition to-the <br />rezoning. There being none, asked if there was anyone <br />desiring to speak in favor of the rezoning. <br />Mr. Walter Roberson, Chairman of the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission was recognized and stated that <br />this property was located north of the drainage canal <br />and on the south side of the highway. One-half of <br />the property is zoned commercial and the other one-half <br />is zoned residential. Future plans are to zone the <br />property from the drainage canal north, to commercial. <br />There being no one else desiring to speak, the hearing <br />was declared closed. <br />5. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION - <br />REZONING THE WEST 1/2 OF BLOCK 1135, BLOCK 1136, BLOCK <br />1137, EAST 1 2 OF BLOCK 1138, EAST 1/2 OF BLOCK 1143, <br />BLOCK 1144, BLOCK 1145, BLOCK 1171, BLOCK 1172, BLOCK <br />i 1173, EAST 1/2 OF BLOCK 1174, EAST 1/2 OF BLOCK 1179, <br />BLOCK 1180, BLOCK 1181, AND WEST 1 2 OF BLOCK 1182, <br />TOWN OF LA PORTE - FROM RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL WITH <br />SPECIAL USE PERMITS FOR LIGHT INDUSTRY - <br />Mayor Thomas called the Joint Public Hearing with the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission to order to consider <br />the rezoning of the above described properties from <br />Residential to Commercial with Special Use Permits for <br />Light Industry. <br />It was ascertained that notices to all property owners <br />and all property owners within 200 feet of the property <br />under consideration for rezoning were mailed on <br />October 2, 1974, and that a public notice of this hearing <br />was published in the official newspaper of the City on <br />October 3, 1974. <br />Mayor Thomas asked if there was anyone desiring to speak <br />in favor of the rezoning? Mr. Walter Roberson was <br />recognized and stated this property was part of the <br />property south of Fairmont Parkway that was to have been <br />re-classified and was inadvertently left out of the legal <br />notice. Therefore, an additional hearing was required. <br />• <br />