My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1982-01-06 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/6/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• Minutes, Regular Meeting, La Porte City Council <br />January 6,.1982, Page 5 <br />Angel: I am Bill Angel. I am fifty percent of this corpora- <br />tion. This sewer situation is bad, and to me it's a disgrace. <br />You say the restrooms at the Gulf station are closed. They <br />may be closed, but stand over there for about an hour some <br />evening and see where the people are using the restroom. They <br />are going to go somewhere. Just walk behind the building. It <br />is a shame. The Gulf people want to tie into the sewer; they <br />already have an on-premises license. Those people are going <br />to relieve themselves. somewhere, and they do because T have <br />stood out there and seen it. It is going to go on if we are <br />there or not, and I think we can help the situation. I think <br />what is going on now is much worse than our proposed solution <br />to the problem. When the City offers the service, we beg to <br />hook up, and so does the Gulf station. There is raw sewage <br />draining out on the open ground right now over there. A fence <br />is a minor cost; it is definitely feasible. <br />Skelton: I have a question for Mr. Paulissen. What is the <br />present requirement for the approval of septic tanks? Can you <br />enlighten me on this? <br />• Paulissen: First, if a residence or business establishment is <br />within 200 feet of a sewer line, they are required to tie in <br />to that sewer line. To my knowledge,. as long as I have been <br />here this City has never had a moratorium on building permits <br />where sewer was not available. There are certain requirements <br />in the building code that must be met for a septic tank system. <br />Mr. Reeder, of Reeder Plumbing., is the plumber on the Tooney's <br />job, and has been quite concerned about the sewage problem. <br />He has consulted an engineer and has come up with a workable <br />solution. Neither Mr. Reeder nor the engineer will guarantee <br />the system because the ground in this area. is gumbo, as Mr. Gay <br />said, and the percolation tests come back pretty close to zero. <br />Skelton: Yes, this is why I wanted to find out if we take into <br />consideration the number of people that will use restroom <br />facilities when we issue permits, especially when they have <br />septic tanks, is this true? <br />Paulissen: Yes, sir. <br />Skelton: My second question is for Mr. Joerns. Do you have an <br />idea of the cost of runming the sewer line from across Fair- <br />mont Parkway to this site? <br />Joerns: It will be sizable. Fairmont Parkway probably approaches <br />200 feet; maybe not quite. They have measured it to be 180 feet <br />• from the manhole to property corner. The major cost of extension <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.