My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
12-05-1983 Public Hearing La Porte City Council'
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1983
>
12-05-1983 Public Hearing La Porte City Council'
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:57 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:38:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/5/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y.. ... ~-~..~-w<,~-: <br />Minutes, Public wring, La Porte City Coun~ <br />December 5, 1983, Page 4 <br />3. Till very recently the residents in our district have <br />been told that there was no chance for annexation until 1985. <br />We were told that the Justice Department would not approve <br />any such annexation because it would dilute the Black vote. <br />What happened to change this? <br />City Attorney Askins: Those representations were not made by <br />this City Council, so I don't believe we could speak on them. <br />I don't know what was told to you out there. I will say I'm <br />quite familiar with the voting rights act, I've already drafted <br />the preliminary draft of the application on this annexation. It <br />could have been some confusion on the 1985 date, because I did a <br />memo- of .this City Council more than a year. ago urging that any <br />major annexations be completed this year because during calendar <br />'84 a redistricting committee would have to work on a redistricting <br />which is required under our charter on the publication of every <br />federal census, which is every 10 years and then halfway in <br />between, which would be 5 years, which would be 1985. And to have <br />that. done in time for 1985 elections and approved by the Justice <br />Department, as Mrs. Westergren has pointed out, you pretty well <br />have to do and complete in 1984 and get it approved. Certainly <br />there will be from the preliminary statistics I have seen, there <br />will be a somewhat of a dilution of the black vote in the. City <br />at large as a result of this annexation because there is not a <br />very great minority population there. Now under the charter of <br />the City of La Porte, there is a provision that annexation be- <br />tween redistrictings the annexed areas shall become a-part of the <br />• district to which it's contiguous. .That means that this annexa- <br />tion, if completed by Council, will be a part of Council district <br />number two,. which is what we call the west Fairmont district. <br />Councilman Longley is the elected representative from that district <br />and will remain a part of district two till the redistricting <br />in -1985. At that time the entire City will have to be redistricted <br />to a population tolerance between district of no more than plus <br />or minus five percent, and that's the outer limit; they like <br />for it to be less than that. The City of La Porte has a burden <br />of proof, as any City does when each annexation we have to file <br />with the Justice Department, and that's already in draft form, <br />to be submitted to them the day after the annexation is completed <br />for their approval under the Voting Rights Act. The Justice <br />Department will study that brief, maps that are submitted with <br />it, statistics, demographics that are submitted with it. They <br />will contact key minority leaders in this community to get their <br />comments, and they have 60 days to study it and they can ask for <br />a 30 day extension to give their approval. If the Justice <br />Department would feel that the annexation would have a negative <br />effect on minority voting rights, they can disapprove it. In <br />the states that are under the. Voting Rights Act, which Texas and <br />most of the other southern states are, the Justice Department <br />requires this clearance--what's called pre-clearance. And we <br />are hopeful this can be accomplished before the April election, <br />and we believe that it can.. On your voting question, if this <br />• annexation is completed in 1983, the residents of the annexed areas <br />will be eligible to be candidates immediately for City office and <br />be eligible to vote in the City election in April. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.