Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes, Public ~aring, La Porte City Coun~ <br />December 5, 1983, Page 5 <br />4. Why aren't the people of our districts being given fair <br />• notice of these hearings, and why are both hearings scheduled <br />the same night? I polled a few of the residents around my house <br />and none of those who signed this sheet which I have here, <br />subscribe to the Bayshore Sun. This again would be directed <br />primarily to our utility district. <br />Mayor Cline: I can't answer your question as to why the people <br />out there were not made aware of it any more so than the people <br />in La Porte.. We of course complied with the requirements in <br />publishing the notice. It's possible that your board out there <br />should have made an effort to notify all the people. I can't <br />answer that; maybe your board members can. <br />City Attorney Askins: The provisions of law say that a notice <br />should be published once in a newspaper having general circulation <br />in the City and in the area to be annexed. The official designated <br />newspaper of the City of La Porte is the Bayshore Sun,. and that is <br />where our legal notices. are published. I would say, from feed- <br />back which the City in various departments have had, that there <br />seems to be a pretty good awareness in the two districts of the <br />pendency of the annexation, other .than the formal, bareboned <br />legal notice, the Bayshore Sun and the Baytown Sun, particularly <br />. have carried a lot of front page articles, backgrounding this and <br />news stories on the hearings and the deliberations of Council. <br />I would regret if there's anybody who feels like they did not <br />• have sufficient notice, but we have published the notices that <br />the law requires. <br />Mayor Cline: Mr. Trahan, I daresay there's very few people in the <br />City of La Porte-that are aware of the public hearings being held, <br />and a lot of them probably do take the local paper, which is our <br />official papers, as Mr. Askins pointed out. But they might read <br />about it, but not retain it. <br />Councilperson Longley: Were these people unhappy about the <br />annexation? <br />Trahan: No, I don't think that many .people are unhappy about it; <br />quite a few of the residents would have preferred to be annexed <br />by Pasadena, and over the years we've been led to believe it <br />was possible. Another thing, a few people fear some of the <br />services will be, when we're first annexed, will possibly be <br />reduced. Several of the residents feel why, after so many years, <br />are we now being annexed. I understand.(?) had a lot to do with <br />it. <br />Councilperson Longley: I can assure you that you're certainly <br />coming into the best city. <br />Mr. Trahan: There's some concern about the fire service. At <br />present, Deer Park responds and some .people fear that possibly <br />• once we switch to La Porte we may not get as quick a response <br />out of La Porte as we did out of Deer Park. <br />