My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1984-03-14 Workshop Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1984
>
1984-03-14 Workshop Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:06:59 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:39:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/14/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />were excavated and reconnected to the liner. Many of these service connections <br />had slipped because they were installed with homemade saddles. Two sections <br />of sagged, bare polyethylene pipe were replaced. These were at apparent <br />old entry pit locations. All excavation had to be performed by hand labor <br />because of the wet soil conditions of the congested work areas. <br />After completion of repairs to the sections described above, all repair <br />locations were water tamped to speed consolidation of the backfill, fences <br />damaged by construction were repairetii or replaced, construction damaged areas <br />were sodded, and a general area clean-up was performed. <br />Difficulties Encountered During Construction <br />Which Affected The Cost of the Project <br />1. Rain delays and associated wet ground condition. <br />2. Congested narrow ROW. <br />3. Items 1 and 2 above necessitated the use of hand labor. <br />4. Charging problems associated with the Farrington Main and subdivision <br />lift station. <br />5. Almost every service connection had slipped into the sewer line and <br />required repair. <br />6. Dips in sewer line caught the television camera. <br />Special Considerations <br />1. Manhole No. 4 will always have approximately 6 inches of standing water <br />because of a bow in the sewer that exists downstream. The condition <br />was improved by point repairs which removed part of the bowed section. <br />2. Manholes No. 5 and No. 6 will always have standing water because the <br />flowlines of the outlet sewers of both manholes were originally <br />constructed several inches higher than the inlets. <br />Normal periodic maintenance will resolve the nuisance caused by these <br />two items. <br />Conclusion <br />Basically the project has been very successful. Minimum resident <br />complaints have been received about construction damage. Many residents <br />have volunteered their opinion of being satisfied by the results. The <br />contractor was responsive to the residents' requests and was considerate <br />in his approach to minimize damage during construction. <br />-2- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.