Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />' .., • • <br />to successfully complete the project is questionable due to the <br />• low amount of his bid and his apparent lack of cleaning and <br />television inspection experie--ce. If the contract is awarded to <br />another bidder, the low bidder will likely protest. The other <br />two bids are undesirable since they are considerably higher than <br />the Engineer's estimate. Regardless of who is to be awarded <br />the contract, delays appear inevitable, and rebidding could be <br />accomplished in less time than resolving any protest. <br />7. Mr. Dippel's opinion, based on available information, is to reject <br />all bids because that would be in the best interest of the City of <br />La Porte. This will be recommended to the La Porte City Council <br />at the meeting to be held on May 16, 1984. <br />• <br />• <br /> <br />-2- <br />~`3 <br />