My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1987-12-07 Workshop Meeting and Called Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1980's
>
1987
>
1987-12-07 Workshop Meeting and Called Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:00 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:42:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
12/7/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ANIMAL CONTROL REPORT <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />Mr. Chris Criner, Sales Representatiye for System LD. of Texas <br />Inc., explained that the system had been in the development stages <br />for the past six years, and had not been publicly available in <br />Texas until this year. Other states currently using this system <br />are California and Minnesota. The system had not experienced any <br />problems. The users of System I.D. also reported no problems with <br />the system, and highly recommended the purchase of the dev ice. <br />The only concern reported by the users was that not many persons <br />knew about the system. Additionally, the users stated that until <br />recently, horses and cattle \-lere the primary animals implanted <br />with the microchip. <br /> <br />For further information, Attachment V provides the cost and <br />explains the procedure of the microchip I.D. system. <br /> <br />"One-Time" Registration Fee <br /> <br />As reflected in the registration survey, a majority of the cities <br />did provide an incentive fee for neutered or spayed animals. <br />However, the surveyed cities reported that due to the high cost of <br />neutering and spaying an animal, registration fees were not often <br />waived. Additionally, the surveyed cities agreed that the <br />neutering or spaying of animals helped to control the animal <br />population, thereby, reducing the number of unwanted and destroyed <br />animals annually. <br /> <br />Close review of the registration process, indicated that the City <br />has registered 254 dogs year-to-date, and on the average, the <br />Revenue Collection Clerk spends approximately 15 to 20 minutes per <br />registration. Presently, the Revenue Collection Clerk is paid an <br />average of $7.50 an hour, which indicates that about $2.48 (33%) <br />of this position's hourly pay may go towards animal registration <br />fees. Therefore, if the City were to adopt a "one-time" <br />registration fee for spayed or neutered animals, the City's <br />financial impact would be minimal, unless of course, all <br />registered animals were neutered or spayed. However, this extreme <br />example would have a positive effect in controlling the animal <br />population. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.