My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1991-10-28 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1991
>
1991-10-28 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:02 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
10/28/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' t 1., ~ '/ <br />euoaer®ore~ Certainly, Spindler/Cummins i~ entitled to~repre~en~ <br />tation on the Board and should move to do so at an early date.. <br />The MUD is still a viable ®ntity an8~as point®d up above, can <br />perform all of the functions it could have performed prior to the <br />annexation. <br />The City of LaPorte~Zoning Ordinance automatically <br />,~.-; . <br />classifies all annexed property R1, meaning single family residences <br />~-"~ only upon such property's annexation to the City. However,~the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission met on Monday, January 14, and ~' <br />approved a recommendation to the City Commission-that the property <br />be zoned industrial. An industrial zoning classification under the ' <br />' LaPorte Zoning Ordinance would enable S/C to develop the property, ' <br />'~ in any manner it saw fit since that classification is all inclusive ' <br />' of all other classifications. However, Mrs. Kline, the..County Clerk,.. • <br />cautioned me that the City Commission has on occasion rejected the <br />,A ~ ~ .. <br />g g y :. ,:. <br />~~~"~ recommendation of the Plannin and Zonin Commission, ;: The Cit <br />Commission will act on the Planning and Zoning Commissions recom- <br />i .: -- <br />~~ mendation on February 4, 1974. ~ ~ ~~ <br />w ~ ... <br />. I have talked with Mr. Hugh Landrum of. Biggs & Landrum, <br />;~• appraisers, who do the appraisal work~for the.City of LaPorte and <br />;, <br />'' the LaPorte School District concerning what his appraisal of• the..... .' <br />' ' ~ ~. <br />• ~~ S/C tract might be. He estimated that his appraisal'. would bean; <br />the neighborhood of $6,000 an~acre or~les$~which would-mean a . <br />tax to S/C of approximately $13,000. 'He.'is'presently working on the` ' <br />appraisal and will submit it~to the City~•Commission~at,.a later date. ' <br />Our firm is currently working on two other minor problems ~ ~~ <br />involving the subject property: a vacangy'in'two surveys of the ~ ; <br />property and an undefined pipeline easement. ~ It;~~'s anticipated..:that <br />•' ~ .both problems will be worked out to'S%C's'satisfaction <br />Our firm has examined the abandonment instruments~~on'file <br />and find that in our opinion all of the streets formerly plattea on <br />the subject property have been abandoned.~~~.: ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.