My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1999-05-24 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1999
>
1999-05-24 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:12 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:55:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/24/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />There are several TIRZ boundary issues or questions that City Council reviewed at the May 17th <br />Workshop. The TIRZ boundary that we began with (Exhibit "A" to Ordinance #2316) was essentially <br />the map under consideration last December minus the lower end of Little Cedar Bayou Park.. The <br />numbers on the attached exhibit labeled "Draft: For Discussion Only" correlate to the following points. <br /> <br />1. Councilman Gay at the March 1 Sth Council meeting mentioned the addition of San Jacinto <br />and West Main from Broadway to SH 146 to provide opportunity for future improvements <br />anticipated in our Comprehensive Plan and Bayfront Master Plan. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />2. LPISD in our discussions has asked consideration for the TIRZ to be used as a funding <br />vehicle for a new elementary school campus. The property owned by LPISD is a 13.8 acre <br />tract at the southwest comer of Avenue D and Sens Road. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />3. Since TIRZs must be contiguous West Main Street, Fairmont Parkway, proposed Bay Area <br />Boulevard, and Sens Road are shown here as connectors to the LPISD property. While two <br />routes are not required staff felt these provided reasonable options. As far as future eligible <br />projects, both routes could be used for: <br /> <br />. Roadway improvements <br />. Intersection improvements <br />. Signalization <br />. Landscaping <br /> <br />The Bay Area Boulevard route is also the proposed location for major water and sewer <br />lines. Of course. as with any other area shown projects mayor may not be approved by <br />Council and integrated in the final plan. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />4. There is quite a bit of open space in this area that could develop and therefore contribute to <br />the "tax increment". I believe TXI was not interested in this area because it involves <br />multiple owners of smaller tracts and to my knowledge they were not pursing contracts for <br />purchase in this area. If Council is interested, this area could be added and the existing <br />businesses could be excepted (Blue Flash, Boncosky Trucking Terminal, etc.). <br /> <br />. Some but not all utilities are available to this area. <br />. Drainage will be a concern for development in this area. <br />. The zoning is G. C. and L.I. <br />. The approximate size is 2S acres. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition (excepting existing businesses) <br /> <br />S. SH 146 right-of-way: Council may want to add this just to make the inclusion of SH 146 <br />uniform. <br />City Council: Recommends Deletion <br />6. The area just west of this tract is the Dutko-Cook property. Recently, Ed Dutko told me <br />that he is losing 70 acres (of his remaining 90 acres) to wetlands. He has stated that he <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.