My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1999-05-24 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
1990's
>
1999
>
1999-05-24 Regular Meeting and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:12 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:55:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
5/24/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />would like to re-configure his and Jim Clifton's apartment project to put a high density <br />residential project (35 + acres) surrounded by woods and dedicate the remaining 70 acres to <br />the City as a park or preserve. We are trying to confirm this wetlands issue with his <br />consultants. The effect of this 70 acre wetlands designation is the loss of projected R-I <br />development in the TIRZ. This area along McCabe Road could be added. It does have <br />some development obstacles mostly sewer capacity and drainage issues. The sewer <br />capacity would be helped by sewer improvements made to support the WeemslDutko/Cook <br />tract. The approximate acreage is 25.4 acres and the zoning is PUD with an underlying <br />land use ofR-l. Recall that R-I developments by themselves are not as attractive as <br />commercial/industrial developments. They have a greater impact on services such as <br />Police, Fire, Solid Waste, etc. However, this area could be considered as replacement of <br />some of the acreage possibly lost to Wetlands. This issue could be considered later on as an <br />amendment. We did, however, want to inform you of Mr. Dutko's conversation. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition (extending area 6 east to So. Broadway) <br /> <br />7. This is Forest View Mobile Home Park and was not originally considered because of the <br />high concentration of residents which could influence the type ofTIRZ (residential vs. <br />commercial). Just visual inspection of the size of the TIRZ as proposed indicates that the <br />area is less than 10%. However, there is probably no strong argument to include this area. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />8. There is approximately 8.3 acres of vacant land that is adjacent to and wraps around the car <br />wash at Broadway and McCabe. This area has access to utilities, its one development <br />obstacle may be adequate drainage. As in area #4, TXI may not have considered this area <br />because they were not pursuing land purchase and did not receive different direction from <br />the City. The present zoning is R-3. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />9. These two street rights-of-way, Park and Bayshore, previously connected to the north line <br />of Little Cedar Bayou Park which has since been removed. I recall the intent was to have <br />options for an improved pedestrian and vehicular route from the proposed hotel site to Little <br />Cedar Bayou Park, the fitness center and eventually the golf course. This linkage was a <br />recommendation in the Bayfront Master Plan. If Council wishes, we will look to re- <br />establish that link by guessing on an appropriate route. This too is also something that <br />could be considered later as an amendment. <br />City Council: Recommends No Changes At This Time <br /> <br />10. We recommend Council consider adding these locations as utility routes to the existing <br />trunk mains in the K Street right-of-way. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />II. Blocks 1114 and 1118 have some title problems. In short, it appears that early developers <br />issued titles based on one plat or layout and another plat with a slightly different layout was <br />filed for record. The end result is owners with titles that do not match the recorded plat and <br />the possibility of more than one deed issued for the same piece of ground. The TIRZ <br />revenues could be used to secure the property, clean up the title and market the property. <br />City Council: Recommends Addition <br /> <br />Areas Added by the City Council: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.