My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2001-01-22 Regular Meeting
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2001
>
2001-01-22 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 8:03:28 AM
Creation date
3/21/2025 1:58:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
1/22/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notes for Bill Scott's 1-22-01 Council Presentation. <br />The stack of documents and tapes I just handed Mrs. Gillett are the presentations of the <br />facts "Common Sense Government " has gathered over the last 2 '/2 years that prove the <br />Farrington extension violates the principles, intent, and specific safety areas of the FAA <br />Airport Design Standards. The audio tape is pertinent parts of conversations with <br />TXDOT's Jim Curl who states they don't want new roads in an RPZ ,and Washington <br />FAA's George Leggerata who states the FAA wants the City to make every effort to <br />acquire ALL of the RPZ land with the FAA grant and who states the City is hanging way <br />out on liability if they don't use the recommendations, which are less than the required <br />standards. <br />We have given these items to a Houston Chronicle Investigative Reporter who <br />approached us about doing articles on our situation and we would like this information <br />put in the public record for future use. Her series of articles should start appearing in a <br />couple of weeks. <br />The FAA/ Txdot tape is part of a package we're preparing to send to the FAA Head <br />office and the Inspector General asking for an investigation into the Design Standards <br />violations, if necessary. We've found two more violations of the contract and the <br />Assurances Document regarding requirements to meet the Design Standards. <br />In the Sept. 28, 1998 Council meeting a Councilman publicly accused us of spreading <br />misinformation. We have conclusive and profound evidence that his statements on that <br />subject were incorrect and we'll be providing that evidence to Council at a later date. <br />However; 3 of the councilman's statements were very true and very important. <br />1. About our concerns on the Farrington extension he stated," I don't even have a <br />problem with them not wanting that if that's what the people ultimately decide they don't <br />want". A 570+ signature petition against the Extension and NO petitions for it. When <br />citizens attended the Sylvan Beach Public Forum, there were 20+ written comments <br />against the extension and NO comments for it. In all of the public meetings on this <br />extension in the past 2 '/2 years dozens of citizens who aren't comfortable with public <br />speaking; got up and spoke against the Farrington Extension and only one got up and <br />spoke for it; and he owns the Mr. Mercury Convenience Store at Spencer and Farrington <br />that would benefit from a large increase in traffic. THE PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED, MR. <br />COUNCILMAN, AND THEY HAVE DECIDED THEY DO NOT WANT THE <br />FARRINGTON EXTENSION. AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOU STICKING <br />BY YOUR STATEMENT AND VOTING TO REMOVE THE FARRINGTON <br />EXTENSION FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. <br />2. Referring to the Farrington extension, He Said, " not wanting it is good enough". <br />WELL; WE DO NOT WANT IT, SO THAT SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH FOR <br />YOU TO VOTE TO REMOVE IT FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.