Laserfiche WebLink
3. Concerning information about the Farrington Extension, He stated, "we need to talk <br />about the facts and not somebody elses idea of the facts". <br />WE HAVE SPENT 2 '/z YEARS GATHERING, STUDYING, AND PRESENTING <br />THE FACTS TO COUNCIL AND TO THE CITIZENS, AND TO SUM THE FACTS <br />UP: <br />Fact 1. The Farrington extension would violate the principles, intent, and specific safety <br />areas of the FAA design standards. <br />Fact 2. The Farrington extension would violate well known and accepted engineering <br />guidelines and principles for neighborhoods. <br />Fact 3. We have proven the Farrington extension is an unacceptable safety hazard to the <br />citizens in our neighborhoods... and there is a White Cross on P street that stands in <br />testimony to that. <br />Fact 4. During our gathering, studying, and presenting the facts we proved that the people <br />wanting this extension did not gather the facts and did not do their homework. <br />We are requesting Council to respect the Vote of the Steering Committee on this issue <br />and VOTE TO REMOVE ALL 3 PHASES OF THE FARRINGTON EXTENSION <br />FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. <br />We are also requesting Council to properly classify the Lomax streets as residential as <br />they are defined to be. <br />Thank you for your consideration, Bill Scott <br />