My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2007-06-25 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting (2)
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
City Council
>
2000's
>
2007
>
2007-06-25 Regular Meeting and Workshop Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2016 12:07:22 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 2:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
City Council
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
6/25/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Meeting and Workshop Meeting - June Z5, ZUU7 <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Christina Delgadillo - Ms. Delgadillo informed Council that Mr. Flanagan would be <br />addressing Council. Mr. Flanagan addressed City Council about the leased property from <br />the City of La Porte with Flanagan Shipping. Mr. Flanagan wanted Council to know <br />renewing lease is critical to their business. He informed Council he had contacted the City <br />but has not heard anything back from the City to date. They want to work out renewing <br />lease with City and wants Council to know they have been responding and working with the <br />City. <br /> <br />9. Close Regular Meeting at 6: 18 and Open Workshop at 6:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Item C was taken out of order. <br /> <br />C. Interim City Manager John Joerns updated council's request for information on <br />GASB45 and HB2365. <br /> <br />Interim Finance Director Michael Dolby informed Council during the pre-budget retreat <br />they were given a pre presentation ofGASB45 and its implications for the City of La <br />Porte. He reminded Council the City has been directed by GASB to do an actuarial <br />study for benefits provided for health care cost. We do not have to fund the study but <br />the standard requires that the City perform the study and make certain disclosures on <br />external audit report. A disclosure is a liability if the City does not fund the annually <br />required amount by the actuary. This approach will insure us receiving a qualified <br />opinion on the audited financial statements. The state of Texas has passed legislation in <br />changes to local code to allow cities to follow a statutory modified accrual basis which <br />will lead to an audited opinion that is not based on generally accepted accounting <br />principles and it will be regularatory opinion and not GAP. Therefore staff is requesting <br />that we do the study for $8,000.00 to see exactly how much is required for us to fund <br />then come back to you to and try to come up with ways to mitigate that liability and <br />reduce it down. The various things that we told you about during the pre-budget retreat. <br />We can change from defined benefits to the defined contributions. We can move people <br />in and out of the plans so we can adjust it so as to lower our liability. We provided you <br />with a pamphlet and I hope you have had the chance to look it over. It has some very <br />good information in it, and should have answered some of your questions about what the <br />accounting rules are and where they are on that. This evening Mr. Tom Peterson from <br />the Audit Firm of Null Larson is present and can answer any auditing questions you <br />have. Also, I called Mr. Ryan O'Hara our Financial Advisor and asked him about the <br />question you had in regards to how the rating agencies would handle a City that did not <br />follow GASB45 and he has not been able to get any answers yet. As soon as he gets <br />those he will come back and give us a presentation. Again, the liability itself is there its <br />not going to go away so, we have to at least look at it and address it and come up with a <br />plan to try to reduce it because we are definitely funding health care for retirees. It is <br />upon us to report it as a liability. We have to do that. Whether we do the study or not. If <br />we don't do anything at all the liability is still going to be there because it is implied in <br />here. <br /> <br />Mayor: What the State's doing were they not going to footnote the liability? <br /> <br />Michael: I think that the literature that we read indicated that they are not going to do <br />anything with it but in the future it also says that if they decide to go with it and provide <br />the benefits for the employees then they themselves as state is saying they got to come <br />back and do the exact same thing were talking about. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.