Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EVALUATION FORM FOR QUALIFICATION STATEMENTS <br />CITY-WIDE DRAINAGE STUDY <br /> <br />Ratings are on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the highest. <br /> <br />FIRM <br /> <br /> <br />CRITERIA <br /> <br />RATING <br /> <br />PERCENT <br />WEIGHTING <br />FACTOR <br /> <br />REVISED <br />RATING <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RELEVANT CONSULTANT <br />EXPERIENCE the Firm's <br />experience with master drainage <br />plans, watershed studies, drainage <br />design and the experience of the <br />proposed team members with these <br />lans studies and desi ns. <br />UNDERSTANDING OF THE <br />PROPOSED SCOPE - the Firm's <br />understanding of the issues facing <br />the city in regard to drainage <br />management, and innovative <br />a roach to solvin these issues. <br />PROJECT APPROACH - specific <br />project approach (work <br />plan/schedule), quality assurance <br />processes and procedures and <br />technical su ort ca abilities. <br />CURRENT CAPABILITIES - the <br />Firm's capacity to respond (current <br />workload and availability) and the <br />specific services provided by team <br />members regularly officing in facilities <br />located within the greater Houston- <br />Galveston area with the ability to <br />quickly respond to issues arising <br />durin the stud . <br />QUALITY AND RESPONSIVENESS <br />OF THE SUBMITTAL - the Firm's <br />responsiveness to the proposed <br />scope of work, timeline and <br />evaluation criteria. <br /> <br />TOTAL POINTS <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL COMMENTS <br /> <br />