Laserfiche WebLink
klotz*associates <br /> Date: August 30, 2010 <br /> Re- analysis of Drainage Impacts to 8106 -02 -00 and B106 -00 -00 <br /> Drainage Improvements for Fairmont Park East <br /> City of La Porte, Texas <br /> Key Map 579C; Pct 2 <br /> HCFCD Project No. 2005922, Unit B106 -02 -00 <br /> Klotz Associates Project No. 0127.012.001 <br /> Background and Purpose <br /> Fairmont Park East (FPE), which includes approximately 110 acres of land, is bordered on its <br /> south side by stream B106-02-00 and on its west side by a pipeline right-of-way and Old <br /> Hickory Drive (see Exhibit 1). B106 -02 -00 empties into Big Island Slough (B106- 00 -00) at a <br /> point approximately 3,500 feet downstream of Fleetwood Drive, the outfall point for runoff from <br /> the FPE development. <br /> Under pre - project conditions, runoff from the development empties into B106-02-00 through a <br /> single outfall pipe. Under post - project conditions, an enlarged outfall pipe and a swale will be <br /> added, thereby increasing flows into the stream. The outfall location will be the same between <br /> pre - and post- project conditions. The differences between the outfall hydrographs between pre- <br /> and post - project conditions were described in our December 2009 report. <br /> The purpose of the analysis described below was to determine the impact of the proposed <br /> drainage improvements on flows within streams B 106 -02 -00 and B106- 00 -00. This analysis <br /> replaces the draft results that were presented during an August 10, 2010 meeting at HCFCD. <br /> Analysis <br /> The HEC -HMS hydrologic model from TSARP was used for the analysis. TSARP subbasin <br /> B106C was divided into seven (7) subareas with FPE being one of the subareas. For subareas C1 <br /> thru C6, unit hydrograph parameters TC and R were calculated and input into HEC -HMS to <br /> compute runoff hydrographs. For the FPE subarea, hydrographs were taken from the XP- <br /> SWMM models described in our December 2009 report. For consistency with the hydrographs <br /> from XP -SWMM, and unlike TSARP procedures, storm peak centers in HEC -HMS were set at <br /> 50% compared to the typical 67% used in TSARP procedures. Exhibit 2 shows the resulting <br /> HEC -HMS schematic. This same schematic applies to both pre- and post - project conditions and <br /> both the 10% (10 year) and 1% (100 year) storm events. <br />