Laserfiche WebLink
i,~~. <br />,~ .ti <br />• <br />August 29, 1985 <br />Hon. Andrew Wilson, Chairman <br />La Porte Planning and Zoning Commission <br />City Hall <br />La Porte* Texas <br />Dear Andy: <br />I will surely appreciate it if you will have page one of the <br />Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission of August 15, 1985 <br />corrected to include my name as one of the seven speakers that <br />evening. I did sign up and speak. <br />Correction is also in order, I believe, on pageeight, line.twenty- <br />seven. I did not indicate I did not with to speak to the Comm- <br />ission. I said I wished to speak in my proper order of signing <br />up rather than as requested to speak by IV'ir..Smith. <br />I will also appreciate it very much if ,you will have included <br />in the Minutes the objections I stated to R-3: <br />1. It allows large apart;:~ent complexes in areas with <br />• single family homes. At present the two types of <br />residential are geographically separated in La <br />Porte for the most part. <br />2. The list of permitted uses and the density in the <br />"~ proposed R-3 sounds like it would be a shabby, un- <br />happy place to live, perhaps a slum. <br />3, Group Care Facilities (defined Sec.. 3 100, Vo1.2, <br />Page 12, Comp. Flan) can or may be (among other in- <br />appropriate things for a residential neighborhood) <br />half-way houses for drug addicts. This in a family <br />neighborhood with permitted homes, schools, parks, <br />playgrounds and, presumably, children. <br />4. If an R-1 or R-2 is rezoned to R-3, or has an R-3 <br />implanted within ifs area, it will reduce greatly <br />the quality of liv ~~g for the people in the adjacent <br />homes remaining R l,~as well as in the newly created <br />R-3. (Shovrn Vol. 1, Lx::ibit 2, Comprehensive Flan) <br />I am-sorry I was not able to make myself clear. I did not mean <br />anybody would be likely to start an R-3 from scratch. I meant <br />to ~~oint out it was such a bad combination it would be bad to <br />put one in an existing R-1 or R-2 district. I hope there v:ill~ <br />never be any R-3, as proposed, in La Forte at all. <br />• <br />