Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting <br />• Minutes of 3-21-91 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Mr. Lewis stated there is also another group of issues which will be raised during <br />the course of this review. These issues are neither minor nor trivial but, rather will <br />affect the City's Comprehensive Plan and therefore the course of La Porte's future <br />development. Included in these issues is a requested amendment to current Business <br />Industrial regulations and consideration of possible adverse impact of the Zoning <br />Ordinance on the Old Main Street commercial district. During consideration of <br />these latter issues, the Commission should use as its guide, the Comprehensive Plan <br />of the City of La Porte. Impact on the plan should be carefully considered in <br />making any decision or recommendation regarding the Zoning Ordinance. <br />Since not all current members were sitting on the Commission during the initial <br />development of the Plan, Mr. Armstrong gave a brief history and overview of the <br />plan. Mr. Armstrong stated that the Comprehensive Plan is one that keeps pace <br />with the City of La Porte, and serves as a guide to the development of the City. <br />It is the Commission's charge, in its role as Planning Commission, to maintain the <br />integrity and viability of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Armstrong suggested that <br />the Commissioners review the Comprehensive Plan and become familiar with it, as <br />this would aid them in the review of the Zoning Ordinance. <br />At this time Mr. Lewis began the review: <br />• I. SECTION 6-400, TABLE B; RESIDENTIAL: <br />Add the wording in Footnote #3 - "located in a rear yard". It would now read "The <br />minimum setback adjacent to any utility easement located in a rear ,yard, shill be <br />three feet (3'). <br />The Commission had no problems with this wording change. <br />II. SECTION 6-400. TABLE A. COMMERCIAL: <br />The creation of a new listing: Dog Grooming Without Overnight Boarding - <br />permitted in a GC zone. <br />The second table listing requiring consideration is SIC #473. This listing is currently <br />permitted within GC •zone. <br />Several questions were raised on these items and further discussion/research is <br />needed. The Commission directed staff to research the issue further and present the <br />information at a future meeting. <br />• <br />