Laserfiche WebLink
® • <br />Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting <br />• Minutes of 3-21-91 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />III. SECTION 10-200.5 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: <br />The requested clarification to Large Lot Residential accessory building requirements <br />deals with building size. Currently reads up to 2,000 square feet and must be located <br />at least 30' from property line... Requested change would read Accessory buildings <br />with a floor area in excess of one thousand 1000 s uare feed must be located at <br />30' feet...... <br />The Commission after discussion had no problem with this change. <br />IV. SECTION 10-304.2: SWIMMING POOLS. SPAS AND HOT TUBS: <br />The City has adopted a more recent edition of the swimming pool code, as this <br />adopted code will likely be updated again within the next twelve months, staff would <br />suggest deleting any specific ordinance reference and rather, adopt the following <br />language -underlined change: <br />Fenc :Swimming pools, spas and hot tubs shall be enclosed within a fence at least <br />four feet (4') in height. Fences shall comply with all requirements of the currently <br />• adopted edition of the Standard Swimming Pool Code published bx the Southern <br />Building Code Congress International. <br />The Commission after discussion had no problem with thie change. <br />V. SECTION 10-500 GENERAL FENCING AND LANDSCAPING <br />REQUIREMENTS: <br />Section 10-507.2 prohibits fencing "within the front yazd setback of any industrial <br />establishment." Staff has had several requests from commercial establishments <br />wishing to fence the entire perimeter of their properties. The requests have <br />primarily come from contractors wishing to fence their yards for security purposes. <br />Should the present industrial fencing restrictions be extended to commercial <br />properties as well? <br />Wording to clarify the intent follows....within the required landscape portion of any <br />yard or the front yazd setback of any commercial or industrial establishment. <br />The Commission after discussion had no problem with the wording clarification. <br />n <br />U <br />