Laserfiche WebLink
0 • <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes of June 19, 1997 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />2. Utility easements shall be 16 feet in lieu of the 10 feet shown. <br />3. By extension, water and sewer shall be provided to the subdivision. <br />Proposed sewer line is not shown. Proposed water is shown, however, it <br />should be located within the right-of-way and not a separate 10 foot <br />easement within the recorded building line. <br />The motion was seconded by Sandie Staniszewski. All were in favor and the motion <br />Passed - <br />IX. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE PRELR YU NARY PLAT FOR SPENCER <br />LANDING SUBDIVISION, SECTION I. <br />W. Rankin presented staffs report. He noted that the Commission granted <br />conditional approval of the Preliminary Plat on May 1,1997. Staff reviewed the <br />amended Preliminary Plat and found it complies with most requirements of the <br />Development Ordinance. Staffs recommendation to the Commission was to <br />approve the plat with conditions. Chairman Waters asked Mr. Dill if he felt there <br />would be a problem meeting the conditions that staff is recommending. Mr. Dill <br />responded there would not be a problem. <br />A motion was made by Eugene Edmonds to approve the amended Preliminary Plat <br />of Spencer Ianding Subdivision, Section I, with the following conditions: <br />1. The current plat shows a temporary 50' access easement with a paved <br />turnaround less than the required 50' radius. Correct the plat to reflect a <br />full 100' diameter (50' radius) asphalt or paved turnaround.. <br />2. The sidewalk requirement shall be stated on the plat. <br />3. Reference to covenants shall be placed on the plat. <br />4. The plat shall reflect the detention area being privately owned and <br />maintained by the Homeowner's Association. <br />The motion was seconded by Jim Zoller. All were in favor and the motion passed. <br />X. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR SPENCER <br />LANDING SUBDIVISION, SECTION I. <br />Mr. Rankin presented staff's report. Mr. Rankin noted that staff reviewed the Final <br />Plat and found it met applicable criteria, however, there were some items that were <br />on the Preliminary Plat that were not on the Final Plat and vice versa. Staff red lined <br />a document which incorporated elements of both the Preliminary and Final Plat, <br />