Laserfiche WebLink
Special Conditional Use PermolkCU04-010 <br />Planning and Zoning Commission <br />July 15, 2004 <br />is <br />Location of Proposed Change <br />2619 Underwood Road <br />Legal Description of Proposed Zoning <br />Lot 10 Block 2 W. J. Payne Subdivision <br />Applicant <br />Lloyd & Linda Duncan <br />Present Zoning <br />General Commercial G <br />Acreage <br />4.00 acres <br />Surrounding Zoning. <br />North General Commercial (GC) <br />East Low -Density. Residential (R 1) <br />South General Commercial ' (GC).. . <br />West Underwood Road <br />Land Use <br />Commercial <br />Activity Proposed <br />Mini -Storage SCUP <br />Summary: . <br />• The applicant is requesting a Special: Conditional. Use Permit (SCUP) for developing a mini- <br />storage/warehousing at this location. <br />• Earlier, SCU#04-004 was recommended for denial on the April 15, 2004, meeting and subsequently <br />denied by Council. <br />• Applicant changed plans for presentation before Council and was instructed to resubmit revised plans <br />to P&Z. <br />• P&Z conducted a Public Hearing and heard ' the issue on. June 15, 2004; action was tabled pending <br />receipt of plans.. <br />• The mini-storage/warehousing is classified as a conditional use in GC zone: <br />• The subject property is in the vicinity of major commercial developments (e.g. shopping center and. <br />restaurants). This application is not in withcurrent and projected commercial/retail uses. <br />• The area is earmarked for commercial uses in the Land Use Plan.. <br />• . The overall impact on public services: should be minimal: <br />.4� Streetstroads should have adequate capacity to handle' the traffic generated by this. proposed <br />development. <br />• Difficulties presented by a pipeline easement and inability to place anything over or on it other than a . <br />driveway together with the easement's effect upon remaining tracts, pose challenges to ordinary retail = <br />development.. . <br />Recommendation: <br />Due to the nature of the narrowness and depth of the tract, and the parameters of the pipeline easement, <br />one viewpoint is that, in this case, the applicant's land use is appropriate. <br />Another view is that while the use may be appropriate, the land could serve better use and benefit to the.'. <br />City .as commercial/mtail in line with current development' in. the area. A PUD may allow flexibility to <br />deal with the unique nature of the pipeline crossing. <br />As seen in the attachments, the applicant attempted to incorporate previous guidance. If approved, the <br />following conditions, as a minimum, should be in place: <br />• SCUPW04-010 is specifically limited to the mini-storage/warehouse as defined in SIC #4225. <br />• Development abutting "R P district shall be screened and landscaped in compliance withrequired <br />screening and landscaping provisions per Section 106-444(a) of the Ordinance; plus the additional <br />requirements listed. <br />• Provide at least -20' wide planting strip .of heavy landscaping abutting residential development in the <br />rear. All landscaping and screening shall be maintained by .the owner/developer. Current trees <br />adjacenfto the residential development are.to be maintained. <br />:('n 1 <br />