Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preserve at Taylor Bayou <br />March 19, 2009 <br />Page 4 of5 <br /> <br />Conclusion! <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Nature Presenre -The applicant is working towards the dedication of <br />(approx. 76-78 acres) nature preserve to the City. While the issues are <br />being worked towards resolution, several questions remain. While the <br />City maintains an interest, a concept of dedicating "Nature Preserve" <br />to the City of La Porte must be considered in light of the City's Parks <br />Master Plan 2002. The concept needs to be presented in more detail, <br />including the layout, clearing of tallow trees and other brush, trail <br />materials used, other structures being built (e.g. decks, benches etc., if <br />any), estimated yearly maintenance costs and possible control of hours <br />of operation to see if the acquisition is in line with the City's projected <br />budget. The City would also require a detailed, formal dedication <br />instrument including all Army Corps mandates to review before <br />considering fInal acceptance of the concept. <br /> <br />Based on the above analysis, staff believes that the current submittal <br />requires further refInement and coordination in the areas of overall site <br />planning, utilities and Preserve dedication. Staff will continue to work <br />with the developer to address issues with this development. We solicit <br />the Commission's input while considering the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Lot numbers 22 and 23 are missing in block 1, phase II, as total lots <br />equal 26 not 28. <br />2. Front building line/setback shall be 25' not 10' as shown on the plan. <br />3. Note #2 shows that patio homes do not meet the minimum lot area of <br />4,500 sq. ft. In addition, it does not meet the minimum yard setbacks of <br />front 20'and min. lot width of 40'. <br />4. Issues of 20' wide alleys, circulation/maneuvering, maintenance, and <br />franchise utility easements. Staff suggests redesign Sections II & IV to <br />meet the minimum standards as per Code of Ordinances. <br />5. Provide public access to Nature Preserve via phase II, block 1. <br />6. An overall density of the multi-family (Section V- apartments) has <br />exceeded 14 dwelling units/acre allowed by the ordinance. General <br />Plan shows 9 buildings with 180 units & 1 clubhouse on 9.074 acres, <br />which equals 20 dwelling units per acre. <br />7. Delete "lift station" shown on the plan as 40'x50' easement/area is for <br />existing SBC facility. <br />8. Explain note #4 (flex buildings) shown on the general plan. Indicate <br />use of northern half of Section 1. <br />9. Verify use of Section VI (commercial tract), Phases, Section III and <br />Section VII is inconsistent. <br />10. Build minimum 10 parking spaces for the Nature Preserve. <br />11. Section VIII (Nature Preserve) acreage ranges from 76 to 78. The <br />current General Plan shows 74.793 acres. Section VII should be a part <br />of Nature Preserve or labellandscapelbuffer to be maintained by the <br />developer. <br />