My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
07-12-2001 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
LaPorte
>
City Secretary
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Adjustment
>
2000's
>
2001
>
07-12-2001 Regular Meeing and Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2022 3:09:36 PM
Creation date
3/21/2025 3:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Meetings
Meeting Body
Zoning Board of Adjustments
Meeting Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />01/24/02 - #A 01-00.2 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />"No sign'nor part of any sign may have lights which flash, move or. rotate in - <br />such a manner as to be confused with traffic signals or emergency vehicle <br />signals, or in a manner that confuses, misleads. or distracts traffic <br />motorists. Beacons may not be placed on any signor be made apart of any <br />sign. Additionally, no sign that resembles an official tall c control sign, <br />signal or device or that bears the words. stop, go slowly, caution, danger, <br />detour, or other wording for traffic control signs or devices may be used <br />within the city. " A copy of the city regulation follows this report and is <br />identified as "Exhibit C". <br />The sign plans submitted along with the permit application did not clearly <br />indicate the use of flashing .or moving lights; therefore, the. subsequent <br />issuance of both permits does not authorize the use of lights that conflict <br />with city regulations <br />Staff has discussed the regulation and the need for compliance with the. <br />applicant; however, Mr. Ybarra has chosen to make use of the appeal <br />avenue. His application to Appeal of the Building Official's Decision <br />#A01-002 follows, this report. The applicant is requesting he be allowed <br />to continue the use of moving lights on both signs. <br />Analysis: In describing the action of appeal, the Code of Ordinances states: In <br />exercising the powers set forth in Section 106-88, the Board of Adjustment <br />may, in conformity with the provisions of this chapter, reverse or affirm, <br />wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or <br />determination as ought to be made; and to that end shall have all the powers <br />of the enforcement officer from whom the appeal is taken. The Board must <br />find the following in order to grant an appeal. <br />a) That there is a reasonable difference of interpretation as to the specific <br />intent of the zoning regulations or zoning map, provided the <br />interpretation of the enforcement off cer 'is a reasonable presumption <br />and the zoning ordinance is unreasonable. <br />Current regulations , are written in a clear manner that. allows the <br />enforcement officer to understand the intent of City Council as it relates <br />to signs and sign lights. This regulation has been in effect for some time <br />and the regulation has not -been proven to be "unreasonable". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.