Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report DecembeM, 2003 <br />Variance Request #V03-004 <br />Requested by: ' James W. Liles, Sr., Property Owner <br />Requested for: Enlargement of a Residential Garage That Would Occupy More Than 25 Percent of the <br />Rear Yard <br />Location: 402 South 5P Street <br />(Block 7; Lots 31,32 & N. 8' of Lot 30; La Porte) <br />Zo_ _ nine: Low Density Residential (R 1) <br />Background: The applicant is requesting additional storage area by enlarging his existing garage. The <br />property. is an existing residential home site located in the old part of town: (See Exhibit <br />A). When reviewing his request, Staff noted two zoning regulations that were applicable <br />and need to be addressed. <br />The property in question is 58' X 125' in size and as shown -on the January 2003 survey a <br />home and garage currently exist on the property. (See Exhibit B) Since the property is a <br />corner lot, the first issue deals with pre-existing, nonconforming structures. The survey <br />identifies that both the home and garage are located five-foot (5) off the public right-of- <br />way in lieu of the required ten -foot (10') side yard setback As a result, both structures <br />are considered pre-existing, nonconforming structures. <br />Although. both structures are pre-existing, nonconforming, based. on the applicant's <br />proposal, only the garage structure is being addressed. Zoning Section 106-262(g) states <br />"an enlargement to a structure can occur if the Board determines that such enlargement <br />will not result in an increase in the degree of nonconformity with the regulations and <br />development standards of the district in which it is located". (See Exhibit Q. <br />The applicant's proposes to add a 6' X 17' storage addition to the southwest corner of the <br />detached garage. As proposed, the addition would be located 4.9' off the rear property <br />line (minimum setback is 3') and 12' off the West C Street right-of-way (minimum <br />setback is 10'). Staff recognizes that the enlargement of the structure would result in a <br />decrease in the degree of nonconformity.. Therefore, this issue does not appear to present <br />a stumbling block in the development. <br />The second and more critical issue addresses lot coverage. Zoning Section 106-741(eXl) <br />states "no accessory building or carport, garage for single-family dwellings shall occupy <br />more than 25 percent of a rear yard nor exceed 1,000 square feet of floor area". (See <br />Exhibit. D). Based on the location of the existing home, the rear yard is 37' X 58' or <br />2,146 square feet in size. Utilizing 25% factor, the maximum size garage allowed would <br />be 536.5 square feet of floor area. The applicant's proposal results in 602 square feet of <br />garage floor area or an overage of 65.5 square feet. This means the garage would occupy <br />approximately 28% of the rear yard in lieu of the maximum 25%. <br />