Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Zoning Board of Adjustment <br />December 4, 2003 <br />#V 03-004 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Analysis: Section 106-192(b)(1), in the Code of Ordinances, defines a variance as a deviation from <br />the literal provisions of the chapter which is granted by the Board when strict conformity <br />to the chapter would cause an unnecessary hardship because of the circumstances <br />unique to the property on which the variance is granted. <br />Except as otherwise prohibited, the board is empowered to authorize a variance from a <br />requirement when the board finds that all of the following conditions have been met. <br />❖ That the granting of the variance will not be contrary to the best public interest. <br />❖ That literal enforcement of the chapter will result in unnecessary hardship because of <br />exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topography or other extraordinary or <br />exceptional physical situation unique to the speck piece- of property in question. <br />"Unnecessary hardship" shall mean physical hardship relating to the property itself <br />as distinguished from a hardship relating to convenience, financial considerations or <br />caprice, and the hardship must not result from the applicant or property owner's own <br />actions; and <br />❖ That by granting the variance, the spirit of the chapter will be observed. <br />The Board is charged with determining if the applicant's variance request to Section 106- <br />741(e)(1) is reasonable and whether all of the above conditions were met. <br />To determine if granting the applicant's request would be contrary to the general public, <br />Staff considered the fact that the home and garage are both pre-existing, nonconforming <br />structures. Whether the Board does or does not grant the applicant's request will not <br />eliminate the nonconformities that exist on the developed site. <br />When looking at the next test, Staff determined that granting the variance would still <br />observe the spirit of the law. If one considers the spirit of the law is to ensure uniformity <br />and property maintenance throughout the City, Staffs. notes there are already some <br />property irregularity at this site. Therefore, it does not appear that the applicant's request <br />will create a negative impact to the property or the surrounding area. <br />The final test is the most difficult and involves unnecessary hardship. Staff does not find <br />the applicant's request meets the physical hardship test, as there is nothing unique about <br />his property.. <br />